UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 548
Default Pushwire cable joiners for permanent installations

Anyone know what the official position on pushwire cable joiners for
permanent installations is?

I'm thinking, for example of a loft light, where you might take a
permanent feed L,N,PE into a surface-mount switch plate and then on to a
batten holder or fluorescent. The switch plate has terminals for the
live, the backbox has a terminal for the PE and you've got to connect
the neutrals together somehow.

Options a

1. Choc block - OK with/without insulation tape?

2. Wire nut - Deprecated in UK for years?

3. Crimp Splice - OK?

4. Crimp version of screwnut - OK?

5. Pushwire connector - ?

See for pics:- http://i42.tinypic.com/dyrqtl.jpg


Cheers,
DaveyOz
  #2   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,360
Default Pushwire cable joiners for permanent installations

On 12/05/10 16:45, Dave Osborne wrote:
Anyone know what the official position on pushwire cable joiners for
permanent installations is?

I'm thinking, for example of a loft light, where you might take a
permanent feed L,N,PE into a surface-mount switch plate and then on to a
batten holder or fluorescent. The switch plate has terminals for the
live, the backbox has a terminal for the PE and you've got to connect
the neutrals together somehow.

Options a


As the joint is enclosed and accessible:

1. Choc block - OK with/without insulation tape?


Yes, without tape.

2. Wire nut - Deprecated in UK for years?


Yuk - I wouldn't.

3. Crimp Splice - OK?


Perfect - can't be bettered for this job (use proper ratchet crimpers
though)

4. Crimp version of screwnut - OK?


Not seen those - probably as it's crimped.

5. Pushwire connector - ?


Is it rated for solid core, mains voltage and the current? If so, yes.

Cheers

Tim

--
Tim Watts

Hung parliament? Rather have a hanged parliament.
  #3   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 548
Default Pushwire cable joiners for permanent installations

Owain wrote:
On 12 May, 16:45, Dave Osborne wrote:
I'm thinking, for example of a loft light, where you might take a
permanent feed L,N,PE into a surface-mount switch plate and then on to a
batten holder or fluorescent. The switch plate has terminals for the
live, the backbox has a terminal for the PE and you've got to connect
the neutrals together somehow.
Options a


6. Don't cut the neutral

Owain


:-)
  #4   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,683
Default Pushwire cable joiners for permanent installations

Wago Lever, one better than the pushin type and based on their long
proven DIN rail version. They come in 2-way 3-way & 5-way, available
on Ebay UK for one (bizarrely no-one does a mixed pack).

They handle flex from very small right up to 4mm, 7-strand (6491X) to
2.5mm, and solid to 2.5mm. Rating is 20A, although UL listing is for
32A, I've used them on heavy loads without issue.
  #5   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 548
Default Pushwire cable joiners for permanent installations

js.b1 wrote:
Wago Lever, one better than the pushin type and based on their long
proven DIN rail version. They come in 2-way 3-way & 5-way, available
on Ebay UK for one (bizarrely no-one does a mixed pack).

They handle flex from very small right up to 4mm, 7-strand (6491X) to
2.5mm, and solid to 2.5mm. Rating is 20A, although UL listing is for
32A, I've used them on heavy loads without issue.


I spotted Wago ones in the new CPC catalogue.

see: http://cpc.farnell.com/jsp/level5/mo...cpc/406617.xml

Are these the ones you are alluding to?

The Wago ones above are ASTA certificated - at 0.75mm2 to 2.5mm2 solid/
1.5mm2-2.5mm2 stranded to 400V/24A. I am assuming that is
"400V-nominal-rms" and is good for 3-phase 400V supplies (which have a
peak phase-phase voltage up to about 622V of course), but this is not
clear from the Wago website.

The team *does* seem to agree that these are acceptable for BS7671
installations, but any idea what/where the "official rubber stamp" for
this product is?

Is there an IET recommendation, or a British Standard?
Who, for that matter, decided wire nuts were not acceptable? They used
to be commonplace in the UK.

Cheers


  #6   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,285
Default Pushwire cable joiners for permanent installations

Owain wrote:

6. Don't cut the neutral


7. Double-pole switch.

With this way of wiring lights seemingly becoming more common it might
only be a matter of time before the manufacturers bring out switches
with a pair of linked neutral terminals built in. This could be applied
to 1-way, 2-way and intermediate switches.

--
Andy
  #7   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,447
Default Pushwire cable joiners for permanent installations

On May 12, 4:56*pm, Dave Osborne wrote:
js.b1 wrote:
Wago Lever, one better than the pushin type and based on their long
proven DIN rail version. They come in 2-way 3-way & 5-way, available
on Ebay UK for one (bizarrely no-one does a mixed pack).


They handle flex from very small right up to 4mm, 7-strand (6491X) to
2.5mm, and solid to 2.5mm. Rating is 20A, although UL listing is for
32A, I've used them on heavy loads without issue.


I spotted Wago ones in the new CPC catalogue.

see:http://cpc.farnell.com/jsp/level5/mo...cpc/406617.xml

Are these the ones you are alluding to?

The Wago ones above are ASTA certificated - at 0.75mm2 to 2.5mm2 solid/
1.5mm2-2.5mm2 stranded to 400V/24A. I am assuming that is
"400V-nominal-rms" and is good for 3-phase 400V supplies (which have a
peak phase-phase voltage up to about 622V of course), but this is not
clear from the Wago website.

The team *does* seem to agree that these are acceptable for BS7671
installations, but any idea what/where the "official rubber stamp" for
this product is?

Is there an IET recommendation, or a British Standard?
Who, for that matter, decided wire nuts were not acceptable? They used
to be commonplace in the UK.

Cheers


The UK aversion to 'wire nuts' is Interesting.
I first encountered them here in Canada some 54 years ago and they are
almost universally and commonly used in domestic and other wiring. As
a rough estimate there are likely a couple of hundred in this house
which we built 40 years ago and can't think of a single problem due to
a wire nut.
In fact the only electrical replacements have been a couple of circuit
breakers, several duplex outlets (in particular two on the basement
work bench that of course got a lot of use plugging/unplugging tools
which were replaced last year because one was cracked and the other
slightly chipped. Maybe a couple of single pole light switches (I
swear the interior of several we used were identical to the then in
use UK variety) and rated for maximum 15 amps 120 volts RMS. Which of
course a lighting circuit rarely if ever is. Three line voltage
electric baseboard heating thermostats (one changed for decorative
reasons) the rest are going strong after the 40 years. Not a single
electric baseboard heater has failed, although the overheat switch on
one of them did go open for some strange reason and it was a year or
two before noticed that one of the two baseboards in that room not
heating!
Typical wiring back then, as in this house is/was 14AWG for 115/120
volt lighting with 15 amp breakers and 12AWG 115/120 volt wiring for
the various duplex outlets. Electric heating wiring is 12AWG 230 volt
again with 20 amp breakers. So the method is to use a larger number of
radial circuits. Ring mains not used anywhere AFIK.
Larger appliances such as an electric cooking stove, tumble clothes
dryer, etc. are wired with heavier gauge wire, usually with heavy plug/
sockets each from a dedicated circuit breaker. The hot water
'tank' (cylinder is wired 10AWG rated for 30 amps at 230 volts
although each of the two 3000 watt elements are wired 'flip flop'
first heating to top of the tank then flipping over to heat the
bottom. However the 10AWG and 30 amp breaker allows both top and
bottom to be paralleled for faster recovery; occasionally convenient
when one has five extra visitors staying and needing showers, extra
dish washing etc. All wiring is copper.
We have for convenience provided some 230 volt duplex outlets at work
benches to cater for some 230 volt tools, including a 1953, 230 volt
Wolf drill, the bench saw and some 230 volt cordless battery chargers.
Also a dedicated 230 volt single 30 amp welder socket in the garage.
We even have a British style switched 230 volt, plus ground, 13 amp
outlet. Probably illegal here! To occasionally plug in anything that
comes by with that type of plug. The single pole switch only switches
off 'one side' of our 230 volt; but the whole thing is beyond a two
pole fused switch above the work bench that kills everything in the
workshop except ceiling lighting every time we leave.
With all this wiring and as mentioned wire nuts are used extensively
and despite the higher amperage necessitated by the half-voltage (a
typical 115 volt toaster can draw 8 to 11 amps) have had no problems
whatever with them.
Using wire nuts where stranded wire is being joined to solid (ceiling
light fixture) may take a little more care, to avoid cutting stands of
wire; but seems infinitely more preferable to those little tiny screws
in chocolate blocks?

For the record:
Solid Cu.cond. ....sq.mm. Rating.Amps.
14AWG 2.08 15
12AWG 3.31 20
10AWG 5.26 30

But probably what one is used to and both the 2 Wire, 230 volt, Live +
neutral and earth and the 3 wire 230/115 live - neutral - live with
ground as used in North America both seem very sensible systems.
  #8   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,175
Default Pushwire cable joiners for permanent installations

In article ,
Dave Osborne writes:
js.b1 wrote:
Wago Lever, one better than the pushin type and based on their long
proven DIN rail version. They come in 2-way 3-way & 5-way, available
on Ebay UK for one (bizarrely no-one does a mixed pack).

They handle flex from very small right up to 4mm, 7-strand (6491X) to
2.5mm, and solid to 2.5mm. Rating is 20A, although UL listing is for
32A, I've used them on heavy loads without issue.


I spotted Wago ones in the new CPC catalogue.

see: http://cpc.farnell.com/jsp/level5/mo...cpc/406617.xml

Are these the ones you are alluding to?

The Wago ones above are ASTA certificated - at 0.75mm2 to 2.5mm2 solid/
1.5mm2-2.5mm2 stranded to 400V/24A. I am assuming that is
"400V-nominal-rms" and is good for 3-phase 400V supplies (which have a
peak phase-phase voltage up to about 622V of course), but this is not
clear from the Wago website.

The team *does* seem to agree that these are acceptable for BS7671
installations, but any idea what/where the "official rubber stamp" for
this product is?

Is there an IET recommendation, or a British Standard?


IET formus do not agree they meet BS7671 for inaccessible
connections, contrary to what the manufacturer claims.

Who, for that matter, decided wire nuts were not acceptable? They used
to be commonplace in the UK.


They were never commonplace for mains wiring. They were used
for things like doorbells, speaker, and aerial cables, so
they were around.

The UK predecessor to the choc block looked exactly like a
wirenut, and I think that's where this confusion arises.
I have many old wiring books with pictures of junction boxes
wired up with these, but even back as far as 1930's, they
all have a grub screw in the side to properly clamp the
conductors - they aren't wirenuts.

They became illegal in the 1970's when all wiring accessories
needed to be covered by an appropriate BS, and they weren't.
However, they weren't in use at that point at all, and never
had been seriously. That's not to say you won't find them -
I found one in a kitchen professionally rewired in 1972, and
presumably botched by someone after that date who found one
in the bottom of their bits tin when moving a socket, and
thought "oh I'll use that".

--
Andrew Gabriel
[email address is not usable -- followup in the newsgroup]
  #9   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,730
Default Pushwire cable joiners for permanent installations

On 13 May, 08:10, (Andrew Gabriel) wrote:
In article ,
* * * * Dave Osborne writes:



js.b1 wrote:
Wago Lever, one better than the pushin type and based on their long
proven DIN rail version. They come in 2-way 3-way & 5-way, available
on Ebay UK for one (bizarrely no-one does a mixed pack).


They handle flex from very small right up to 4mm, 7-strand (6491X) to
2.5mm, and solid to 2.5mm. Rating is 20A, although UL listing is for
32A, I've used them on heavy loads without issue.


I spotted Wago ones in the new CPC catalogue.


see:http://cpc.farnell.com/jsp/level5/mo...cpc/406617.xml


Are these the ones you are alluding to?


The Wago ones above are ASTA certificated - at 0.75mm2 to 2.5mm2 solid/
1.5mm2-2.5mm2 stranded to 400V/24A. I am assuming that is
"400V-nominal-rms" and is good for 3-phase 400V supplies (which have a
peak phase-phase voltage up to about 622V of course), but this is not
clear from the Wago website.


The team *does* seem to agree that these are acceptable for BS7671
installations, but any idea what/where the "official rubber stamp" for
this product is?


Is there an IET recommendation, or a British Standard?


IET formus do not agree they meet BS7671 for inaccessible
connections, contrary to what the manufacturer claims.

Who, for that matter, decided wire nuts were not acceptable? They used
to be commonplace in the UK.


They were never commonplace for mains wiring. They were used
for things like doorbells, speaker, and aerial cables, so
they were around.

The UK predecessor to the choc block looked exactly like a
wirenut, and I think that's where this confusion arises.
I have many old wiring books with pictures of junction boxes
wired up with these, but even back as far as 1930's, they
all have a grub screw in the side to properly clamp the
conductors - they aren't wirenuts.

They became illegal in the 1970's when all wiring accessories
needed to be covered by an appropriate BS, and they weren't.
However, they weren't in use at that point at all, and never
had been seriously. That's not to say you won't find them -
I found one in a kitchen professionally rewired in 1972, and
presumably botched by someone after that date who found one
in the bottom of their bits tin when moving a socket, and
thought "oh I'll use that".

--
Andrew Gabriel
[email address is not usable -- followup in the newsgroup]


Andrew - I reckon you're just not old enough !! Ceramic wire nuts -
and I didn't recognise that as the correct term for them, we just
called them screw connectors, were still being used extensively when I
started doing wiring in the 50's and 60's.

Rob
  #10   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,565
Default Pushwire cable joiners for permanent installations

On May 13, 8:10*am, (Andrew Gabriel)
wrote:
In article ,
* * * * Dave Osborne writes:



js.b1 wrote:
Wago Lever, one better than the pushin type and based on their long
proven DIN rail version. They come in 2-way 3-way & 5-way, available
on Ebay UK for one (bizarrely no-one does a mixed pack).


They handle flex from very small right up to 4mm, 7-strand (6491X) to
2.5mm, and solid to 2.5mm. Rating is 20A, although UL listing is for
32A, I've used them on heavy loads without issue.


I spotted Wago ones in the new CPC catalogue.


see:http://cpc.farnell.com/jsp/level5/mo...cpc/406617.xml


Are these the ones you are alluding to?


The Wago ones above are ASTA certificated - at 0.75mm2 to 2.5mm2 solid/
1.5mm2-2.5mm2 stranded to 400V/24A. I am assuming that is
"400V-nominal-rms" and is good for 3-phase 400V supplies (which have a
peak phase-phase voltage up to about 622V of course), but this is not
clear from the Wago website.


The team *does* seem to agree that these are acceptable for BS7671
installations, but any idea what/where the "official rubber stamp" for
this product is?


Is there an IET recommendation, or a British Standard?


IET formus do not agree they meet BS7671 for inaccessible
connections, contrary to what the manufacturer claims.

Who, for that matter, decided wire nuts were not acceptable? They used
to be commonplace in the UK.


They were never commonplace for mains wiring. They were used
for things like doorbells, speaker, and aerial cables, so
they were around.

The UK predecessor to the choc block looked exactly like a
wirenut, and I think that's where this confusion arises.
I have many old wiring books with pictures of junction boxes
wired up with these, but even back as far as 1930's, they
all have a grub screw in the side to properly clamp the
conductors - they aren't wirenuts.

They became illegal in the 1970's when all wiring accessories
needed to be covered by an appropriate BS, and they weren't.
However, they weren't in use at that point at all, and never
had been seriously. That's not to say you won't find them -
I found one in a kitchen professionally rewired in 1972, and
presumably botched by someone after that date who found one
in the bottom of their bits tin when moving a socket, and
thought "oh I'll use that".



Looks like a minor wiki article to me... mind if you or I copy it into
one?


NT


  #11   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,683
Default Pushwire cable joiners for permanent installations

On May 13, 8:10*am, (Andrew Gabriel)
wrote:
IET formus do not agree they meet BS7671 for inaccessible
connections, contrary to what the manufacturer claims.


I agree, not suitable for inaccessible.

Re current draw from Wago technical...

EU rating is 32A...
- UK 32A Ring permitted with 2.5mm solid
- UK 32A Radial not permitted with 4.0mm 7-strand (6242 or 6491X)

Wago will accept 4.0mm Fine-Stranded (Flex) which is technically
permitted for a 32A radial if a) all terminals are suitable for flex
or b) suitably prepared (bootlace ferrules). Most older DNO chaps
would have a fit, but BS7671 17th does permit it - however since 4.0mm
flex is much more expensive than Flat-Twin-&-Earth it is of academic
value only.

US (UL) rating is 20A...
- US 20A due to wire size limits, 2.5mm limit on solid & 7-strand
- "they have only been tested & certified for 4.0mm Fine".


"Wirenuts" were common in the North even into the 1950s probably by
"old sparks", less so in the South. I think they relied on 2 factors -
cables of that era were a) tinned & b) multi-strand.
a) Tinning excludes corrosion when strands are twisted inside a wire-
nut so achieving a gas tight joint. Canadian wire I believe has tinned
conductors, UK circa 1950s PVC Flat Twin & Earth (FTE) had bare single
copper conductors, UK circa 1950s PVC Flat Twin (no earth) retained
tinned multi-strand conductors.
b) Multi-strand conductor must be essential for wire-nut twisting
action without conductor breakage. Again UK after circa 1950s moved to
solid conductor for 1.0 1.5 2.5mm sizes which would be more likely to
fracture in a wirenut.

Another issue with wirenuts is one of direct contact with the wirenut
terminal, they were commonly used outside of an enclosure which to the
unwary crawling around a dark loft could be an unpleasant surprise. UK
lighting circa 1950s used 3-strand tinned which is mechanically pretty
weak and of remarkably small cross section - it does not take much to
fracture the conductors which could result in overheating.
  #12   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 548
Default Pushwire cable joiners for permanent installations

js.b1 wrote:
On May 13, 8:10 am, (Andrew Gabriel)
wrote:
IET formus do not agree they meet BS7671 for inaccessible
connections, contrary to what the manufacturer claims.


I agree, not suitable for inaccessible.

Re current draw from Wago technical...

EU rating is 32A...
- UK 32A Ring permitted with 2.5mm solid
- UK 32A Radial not permitted with 4.0mm 7-strand (6242 or 6491X)


OK, we need to be clear on which series we are talking about.

The 273 series is rated at 18A, 24A or 32A @ 400V

The 2273 series is rated at 24A @ 450V

The 773 series is rated at (24A or 41A @ 400V) or

(24A or 42A @ 550V)

I'm still not clear whether the "400V" rating is good for UK 3-phase,
which could be as high as 440V rms. I am sure it would be ok in
practice, but why doesn't the manufacturer say so?

http://www.wago.com/cps/rde/xchg/wag...eng-index.html

click: online catalogue | Contents | Ternminal Blocks and Connectors |
installation connectors | push-wire connectors for junction boxes


Finally, what is the argument for "not suitable for inaccessible"?



Cheers,
DaveyOz
  #13   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,683
Default Pushwire cable joiners for permanent installations

Oops.
My comments are re Wago 222 Series - orange lever type.
Strip wire 10mm bare end, lift lever up, insert wire, close lever.
This link might work or it might not -
http://www.wago.com/cps/rde/xchg/SID...l/sgp-2631.htm

Wiring Regs require connections to remain accessible unless crimped,
soldered etc. Push-in type do not give me confidence, Lever involves a
hand operation, neither are a crimp in terms of "cold weld" although
Lever goes a lot closer to it.
  #14   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,447
Default Pushwire cable joiners for permanent installations

On May 13, 1:53*pm, wrote:
On 13 May, *
* * *"js.b1" wrote:



"Wirenuts" were common in the North even into the 1950s probably by
"old sparks", less so in the South. I think they relied on 2 factors -
cables of that era were a) tinned & b) multi-strand.
a) Tinning excludes corrosion when strands are twisted inside a wire-
nut so achieving a gas tight joint. Canadian wire I believe has tinned
conductors, UK circa 1950s PVC Flat Twin & Earth (FTE) had bare single
copper conductors, UK circa 1950s PVC Flat Twin (no earth) retained tinned
multi-strand conductors. b) Multi-strand conductor must be essential for
wire-nut twisting action without conductor breakage. Again UK after circa
1950s moved to solid conductor for 1.0 1.5 2.5mm sizes which would be more
likely to fracture in a wirenut.


Most instances of wirenuts in my experiance have been on lead sheathed 1/044
twin. Tinned single strand. mainly dating from the 30s.

50s (TRS) and 60s (PVC) cables were mainly 3/029 twin (tinned 3 strand). but
some was still 1/044 IME. I've never seen wirenuts used on larger cables.

It's difficult using them on a mix of 3/029 and 1/044. *

--
* B Thumbs
* Change lycos to yahoo to reply


Hey; I had forgotten the 'wire nut' style with a grub screw!
Although have used the odd one. Very useful.
Have seen then with both slotted and hexagon (and I think) square
Robertson headed grub screws. All made of brass.
One use for those grub screw type has been to fix broken spots in
coiled resistance wire heater coils. A temporary repair but which in
some cases have lasted an incredible length of time. We fixed one of
the heating coils of my neighbours clothes dryer some five years ago
because 'it was not getting as hot as usual and was taking longer to
dry the clothes'!
They still seem to be using that dryer! When using them that way on
hard resistance wire hand cranked the brass 'set/grub' screw as tight
as possible without stripping it. Seems to work!
  #15   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,092
Default Pushwire cable joiners for permanent installations

We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
drugs began to take hold. I remember Owain
saying something like:

On 13 May, 11:03, robgraham wrote:
Andrew - I reckon you're just not old enough !! *Ceramic wire nuts -
and I didn't recognise that as the correct term for them, we just
called them screw connectors, were still being used extensively when I
started doing wiring in the 50's and 60's.


Scruits, IIRC. Very common with lead-sheathed cable installs. I have a
bagful retrieved from an old installation, jealously guarded. And I
remember a textbook describing them as being useful, and IIR *that* C
it would have been Modern Wiring Practice by Steward & Stubbs in c.
1985.


I recall coming across many of these things in the 60s and 70s, fitted
in houses as extensions/repairs to mains wiring (probably by house
owners). I don't recall any sparks using them, but it was possible some
did.


  #16   Report Post  
Posted to uk.d-i-y
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,175
Default Pushwire cable joiners for permanent installations

In article ,
NT writes:

Who, for that matter, decided wire nuts were not acceptable? They used
to be commonplace in the UK.


They were never commonplace for mains wiring. They were used
for things like doorbells, speaker, and aerial cables, so
they were around.

The UK predecessor to the choc block looked exactly like a
wirenut, and I think that's where this confusion arises.
I have many old wiring books with pictures of junction boxes
wired up with these, but even back as far as 1930's, they
all have a grub screw in the side to properly clamp the
conductors - they aren't wirenuts.

They became illegal in the 1970's when all wiring accessories
needed to be covered by an appropriate BS, and they weren't.


Just to add - as with many things which went illegal when this
happened, probably no one decided to make them illegal, but
the manufacturer would have had to generate a BS to keep them
legal, and didn't do so.

However, they weren't in use at that point at all, and never
had been seriously. That's not to say you won't find them -
I found one in a kitchen professionally rewired in 1972, and
presumably botched by someone after that date who found one
in the bottom of their bits tin when moving a socket, and
thought "oh I'll use that".

Looks like a minor wiki article to me... mind if you or I copy it into
one?


Fine by me.
It seems like they may have been more common up north though.

--
Andrew Gabriel
[email address is not usable -- followup in the newsgroup]
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Review biscuit joiners [email protected] Home Repair 8 January 28th 09 02:30 AM
Name of Joiners used with MDF [email protected] Woodworking 7 November 13th 07 07:50 AM
Q? Fein plate joiners Sweet Sawdust Woodworking 3 July 2nd 05 06:14 AM
BISQUIT JOINERS??? res0orrw Woodworking 15 June 16th 05 08:58 PM
biscuit joiners habbi Woodworking 10 May 6th 05 08:13 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 DIYbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about DIY & home improvement"