Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
catnic style lintel - point loads
Catnic style lintel opening size 1500mm. You cannot have point loads
on them, but I will effectively have a single celcon block (440 wide), then an engineering brick padstone, then the load (end of a purlin), so would this spread the load enough? Else I could put a concrete lintel instead of the eng brick to spread the load a bit more, say over 2 blocks. Of course this is thermal bridging so a balance must be struck ! Cheers, Simon. |
#2
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
catnic style lintel - point loads
On 29 June, 16:32, sm_jamieson wrote:
Catnic style lintel opening size 1500mm. You cannot have point loads on them, but I will effectively have a single celcon block (440 wide), then an engineering brick padstone, then the load (end of a purlin), so would this spread the load enough? Else I could put a concrete lintel instead of the eng brick to spread the load a bit more, say over 2 blocks. Of course this is thermal bridging so a balance must be struck ! Cheers, Simon. Well, for future ref, the catnic brochure says: Do not apply point loads without prior consultation. Where the loading or a substantial part of it is applied as concentrated loads, each concentrated load must be supported over a length of lintel of not less than 200mm. In such cases, the total loading must not produce bending moments or shear forces greater than those produced by the uniformly distributed loads specified in the relevant data tables. So I would imagine a purlin over a whole 440mm block is generally OK. Simon. |
#3
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
catnic style lintel - point loads
Simon wrote:
On 29 June, 16:32, sm_jamieson wrote: Catnic style lintel opening size 1500mm. You cannot have point loads on them, but I will effectively have a single celcon block (440 wide), then an engineering brick padstone, then the load (end of a purlin), so would this spread the load enough? Else I could put a concrete lintel instead of the eng brick to spread the load a bit more, say over 2 blocks. Of course this is thermal bridging so a balance must be struck ! Cheers, Simon. Well, for future ref, the catnic brochure says: Do not apply point loads without prior consultation. Where the loading or a substantial part of it is applied as concentrated loads, each concentrated load must be supported over a length of lintel of not less than 200mm. In such cases, the total loading must not produce bending moments or shear forces greater than those produced by the uniformly distributed loads specified in the relevant data tables. So I would imagine a purlin over a whole 440mm block is generally OK. Simon. Yes, except that aircrete blocks could crush under the load, better to use a pre-stressed concrete padstone -- Phil L RSRL Tipster Of The Year 2008 |
#4
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
catnic style lintel - point loads
On 30 June, 17:54, "Phil L" wrote:
Simon wrote: On 29 June, 16:32, sm_jamieson wrote: Catnic style lintel opening size 1500mm. You cannot have point loads on them, but I will effectively have a single celcon block (440 wide), then an engineering brick padstone, then the load (end of a purlin), so would this spread the load enough? Else I could put a concrete lintel instead of the eng brick to spread the load a bit more, say over 2 blocks. Of course this is thermal bridging so a balance must be struck ! Cheers, Simon. Well, for future ref, the catnic brochure says: Do not apply point loads without prior consultation. Where the loading or a substantial part of it is applied as concentrated loads, each concentrated load must be supported over a length of lintel of not less than 200mm. In such cases, the total loading must not produce bending moments or shear forces greater than those produced by the uniformly distributed loads specified in the relevant data tables. So I would imagine a purlin over a whole 440mm block is generally OK. Simon. Yes, except that aircrete blocks could crush under the load, better to use a pre-stressed concrete padstone Do you mean a padstone between the aircrete block and the purlin, or a whole concrete block instead of the aircrete. I don't think the BCO would like losing a whole aircrete block for insulation reasons. I believe a common padstone in this situation is simply an engineering brick, which is what I mentioned earlier. I've no objection to putting in a prestressed concrete lintel over the whole opening if it was required, but I suspect this would be over-engineering ! Certainly aircrete is used for loadbearing purposes, and I've at least seen floor joist hangers directly on aircrete. Cheers, Simon. |
#5
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
catnic style lintel - point loads
Simon wrote:
On 30 June, 17:54, "Phil L" wrote: Simon wrote: On 29 June, 16:32, sm_jamieson wrote: Catnic style lintel opening size 1500mm. You cannot have point loads on them, but I will effectively have a single celcon block (440 wide), then an engineering brick padstone, then the load (end of a purlin), so would this spread the load enough? Else I could put a concrete lintel instead of the eng brick to spread the load a bit more, say over 2 blocks. Of course this is thermal bridging so a balance must be struck ! Cheers, Simon. Well, for future ref, the catnic brochure says: Do not apply point loads without prior consultation. Where the loading or a substantial part of it is applied as concentrated loads, each concentrated load must be supported over a length of lintel of not less than 200mm. In such cases, the total loading must not produce bending moments or shear forces greater than those produced by the uniformly distributed loads specified in the relevant data tables. So I would imagine a purlin over a whole 440mm block is generally OK. Simon. Yes, except that aircrete blocks could crush under the load, better to use a pre-stressed concrete padstone Do you mean a padstone between the aircrete block and the purlin, or a whole concrete block instead of the aircrete. I don't think the BCO would like losing a whole aircrete block for insulation reasons. A pre-stresed lintel is 75H X 100W by whatever length you want to make it - it's not going to make one iota of difference WRT insulation. I believe a common padstone in this situation is simply an engineering brick, which is what I mentioned earlier. a brick is only 200mm long. I've no objection to putting in a prestressed concrete lintel over the whole opening if it was required, but I suspect this would be over-engineering ! PS lintels come in many lengths, I was thinking say about 5 - 600mm, then it covers more than one aircrete block in length. Certainly aircrete is used for loadbearing purposes, and I've at least seen floor joist hangers directly on aircrete. Floor joists are many and each one takes a small amount of weight, a *single* purlin takes the weight of all the joists, which are holding up the battens and tiles and everything else. -- Phil L RSRL Tipster Of The Year 2008 |
#6
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
catnic style lintel - point loads
On 30 June, 21:23, "Phil L" wrote:
Simon wrote: On 30 June, 17:54, "Phil L" wrote: Simon wrote: On 29 June, 16:32, sm_jamieson wrote: Catnic style lintel opening size 1500mm. You cannot have point loads on them, but I will effectively have a single celcon block (440 wide), then an engineering brick padstone, then the load (end of a purlin), so would this spread the load enough? Else I could put a concrete lintel instead of the eng brick to spread the load a bit more, say over 2 blocks. Of course this is thermal bridging so a balance must be struck ! Cheers, Simon. Well, for future ref, the catnic brochure says: Do not apply point loads without prior consultation. Where the loading or a substantial part of it is applied as concentrated loads, each concentrated load must be supported over a length of lintel of not less than 200mm. In such cases, the total loading must not produce bending moments or shear forces greater than those produced by the uniformly distributed loads specified in the relevant data tables. So I would imagine a purlin over a whole 440mm block is generally OK. Simon. Yes, except that aircrete blocks could crush under the load, better to use a pre-stressed concrete padstone Do you mean a padstone between the aircrete block and the purlin, or a whole concrete block instead of the aircrete. I don't think the BCO would like losing a whole aircrete block for insulation reasons. A pre-stresed lintel is 75H X 100W by whatever length you want to make it - it's not going to make one iota of difference WRT insulation. I believe a common padstone in this situation is simply an engineering brick, which is what I mentioned earlier. a brick is only 200mm long. I've no objection to putting in a prestressed concrete lintel over the whole opening if it was required, but I suspect this would be over-engineering ! PS lintels come in many lengths, I was thinking say about 5 - 600mm, then it covers more than one aircrete block in length. Certainly aircrete is used for loadbearing purposes, and I've at least seen floor joist hangers directly on aircrete. Floor joists are many and each one takes a small amount of weight, a *single* purlin takes the weight of all the joists, which are holding up the battens and tiles and everything else. -- Thanks, I understand what you're saying now. Sounds like a good idea. Simon. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
brad point vs twist point | Woodworking | |||
Turned Piece The End Point OR A Step To The End Point? | Woodturning | |||
VCR JVC HR-A33U loads non-existent tape and re-loads existent | Electronics Repair | |||
Catnic Lintel, is this the right one? | UK diy |