Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Woodturning (rec.crafts.woodturning) To discuss tools, techniques, styles, materials, shows and competitions, education and educational materials related to woodturning. All skill levels are welcome, from art turners to production turners, beginners to masters. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.crafts.woodturning
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Being a Krenovian ( James Krenov being a prominent furniture maker who
espouses Do a few things, but do them exceptionaly well - keep it simple / less is more - and It's The Wood Stupid ), I tended towards turnings that were as close to the natural wood as possible - little if anything between you the viewer / holder and the wood. And all the surfaces should be as smooth as possible and, preferably, sensuous. The finished piece should be Off The Lathe - completely done on the lathe - in one, maybe two set ups - but all on a single axis. Then things changed. It started with Barbara Dill's article in the Fall 07 American Woodturner magazine on multi-axis turning. Single axis symetry started to feel a little constraining. Then I watched Cindy Drozda do a beautiful, elegant little three sided lidded box. Both kept it Off The Lathe - pure wood - but . . . a crack was opening in my Purist Approach. I've just gone through 105 hi res photos of a demonstration Neil and Liz Scobie did for our woodturning club, after going through hundreds of photos from demonstrations by Binh Pho, Bonnie Klein and Malcom Tibbet (there are advantages to volunteering to be a club webmaster). My Purist Approach - pure wood, pure symetry - has, as a result, been shaken further. A turning may be only an intermediate step towards the ultimate end point. By piercing and carving and texturing and painting/ staining / burning(pyrography) / charring / sand blasting/ patina-ing - new dimensions of interest / expression may be added - for better OR worse. The option of "enhancing" can be a double edged sword - most enahancements are irreversible. And somewhere on that path the piece may cease to be a turning. Worse yet, THE BUZZ may be lost. I really really like turning - the immediacy of results - in an hour or so it's done. Good, bad or in between - in an hour or so I've made a piece. A chunk of wood, two or three tools - and maybe some sandpaper - and an hour or so - start to finish - almost instant gratification, or disappointment. All decisions are made On The Fly - little if any Should I Do This OR Should I Do That - it just happens. No Post Lathe stuff to do. It comes off the lathe and it's done. The various Post Lathe processes all take more tools, more materials - and a lot more time. Do I really need to learn yet more techniques, more materials/mediums? There's already so much to learn with pure single axis turning. Why head down another yet another path when I haven't really explored the immediate vicinity of where I am now? So I asked those of you who have ventured Over The Next HIll - is there still THE BUZZ? Are there Zen Moments - Out There? charlie b |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What's the point? | Home Repair | |||
What's the point? | Home Repair | |||
What's the point? | Home Repair | |||
so he has a point | Metalworking |