Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Lardy ******* - Huge
Huge wrote: The Medway Handyman wrote: If you mean Body Mass Index its a totally discredited system. Do you really want to be killfiled? Why? Because I have an opinion thats different to yours? No, because you're an idiot. Do some research. Hint: One of us has a degree in biochemistry. Further hint: It isn't you. BMI dates from the early 1800's and takes no account of proportions of fat, muscle, bone, cartilage, water weight etc. In other words it doesn't work for individuals. If you're sufficiently dumb that you fail to take things like that into account when discussing BMI, then more fool you. For the general population BMI is perfectly reasonable measure. It certainly isn't "totally discredited". OK smartass, since you are the font of all knowledge, enlighten me. I am 1.87m tall and weigh 107 kg. Now what does that tell you, with your alleged degree in biochemistry about me? I assume that you don't have a credible answer? So much for your alleged degree. -- Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk 01634 717930 07850 597257 |
#2
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Lardy ******* - Huge
The Medway Handyman wrote:
Huge wrote: The Medway Handyman wrote: If you mean Body Mass Index its a totally discredited system. Do you really want to be killfiled? Why? Because I have an opinion thats different to yours? No, because you're an idiot. Do some research. Hint: One of us has a degree in biochemistry. Further hint: It isn't you. BMI dates from the early 1800's and takes no account of proportions of fat, muscle, bone, cartilage, water weight etc. In other words it doesn't work for individuals. If you're sufficiently dumb that you fail to take things like that into account when discussing BMI, then more fool you. For the general population BMI is perfectly reasonable measure. It certainly isn't "totally discredited". OK smartass, since you are the font of all knowledge, enlighten me. I am 1.87m tall and weigh 107 kg. Now what does that tell you, with your alleged degree in biochemistry about me? I assume that you don't have a credible answer? So much for your alleged degree. It tell me hes a self absorbed egotists. I don't know what weight I am at all. |
#3
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Lardy ******* - Huge
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:23:52 GMT, The Medway Handyman wrote:
Huge wrote: The Medway Handyman wrote: If you mean Body Mass Index its a totally discredited system. Do you really want to be killfiled? Why? Because I have an opinion thats different to yours? No, because you're an idiot. Do some research. Hint: One of us has a degree in biochemistry. Further hint: It isn't you. BMI dates from the early 1800's and takes no account of proportions of fat, muscle, bone, cartilage, water weight etc. In other words it doesn't work for individuals. If you're sufficiently dumb that you fail to take things like that into account when discussing BMI, then more fool you. For the general population BMI is perfectly reasonable measure. It certainly isn't "totally discredited". OK smartass, since you are the font of all knowledge, enlighten me. I am 1.87m tall and weigh 107 kg. Now what does that tell you, with your alleged degree in biochemistry about me? I assume that you don't have a credible answer? So much for your alleged degree. I suspect there's some poor attributing and snipping to get to this point, BICBW. -- the dot wanderer at tesco dot net |
#4
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Lardy ******* - Huge
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:44:13 +0000, Huge wrote:
On 2008-03-13, The Natural Philosopher wrote: The Medway Handyman wrote: Huge wrote: The Medway Handyman wrote: If you mean Body Mass Index its a totally discredited system. Do you really want to be killfiled? Why? Because I have an opinion thats different to yours? No, because you're an idiot. Do some research. Hint: One of us has a degree in biochemistry. Further hint: It isn't you. BMI dates from the early 1800's and takes no account of proportions of fat, muscle, bone, cartilage, water weight etc. In other words it doesn't work for individuals. If you're sufficiently dumb that you fail to take things like that into account when discussing BMI, then more fool you. For the general population BMI is perfectly reasonable measure. It certainly isn't "totally discredited". OK smartass, since you are the font of all knowledge, enlighten me. I am 1.87m tall and weigh 107 kg. Now what does that tell you, with your alleged degree in biochemistry about me? I assume that you don't have a credible answer? So much for your alleged degree. I have killfiled you. The very fact that you ask the question demonstrates that you do not understand. Your posturing on this and other matters tells me that you're an obese smoker with high cholesterol and a penchant for swimming in Egypt. ================================== It suggests that he's an obese smoker with high cholesterol and a penchant for swimming in Egypt who's quite satisfied with his lot and doesn't want nanny.????? telling him how to change it. Cic. -- =================================== Using Ubuntu Linux Windows shown the door =================================== |
#5
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Lardy ******* - Huge
Huge wrote:
On 2008-03-13, The Natural Philosopher wrote: The Medway Handyman wrote: Huge wrote: The Medway Handyman wrote: If you mean Body Mass Index its a totally discredited system. Do you really want to be killfiled? Why? Because I have an opinion thats different to yours? No, because you're an idiot. Do some research. Hint: One of us has a degree in biochemistry. Further hint: It isn't you. BMI dates from the early 1800's and takes no account of proportions of fat, muscle, bone, cartilage, water weight etc. In other words it doesn't work for individuals. If you're sufficiently dumb that you fail to take things like that into account when discussing BMI, then more fool you. For the general population BMI is perfectly reasonable measure. It certainly isn't "totally discredited". OK smartass, since you are the font of all knowledge, enlighten me. I am 1.87m tall and weigh 107 kg. Now what does that tell you, with your alleged degree in biochemistry about me? I assume that you don't have a credible answer? So much for your alleged degree. I have killfiled you. The very fact that you ask the question demonstrates that you do not understand. Your posturing on this and other matters tells me that you're an obese smoker with high cholesterol and a penchant for swimming in Egypt. "swimming in Egypt" WTF does that mean? Anyone else know? Shame you won't read this cos I have a confession to make. I lied. I'm not 1.87m tall and I don't weigh 107kg. That would be Arnold Schwarzenegger in 1975 when he won the Mr Olympia title for the 5th time. The fat *******. Still, with a BMI of 30.5 he must be obese, Huge said so and he has a degree in biochemistry. -- Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk 01634 717930 07850 597257 |
#6
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Lardy ******* - Huge
"The Medway Handyman" wrote in message
m... Shame you won't read this cos I have a confession to make. I lied. I'm not 1.87m tall and I don't weigh 107kg. That would be Arnold Schwarzenegger in 1975 when he won the Mr Olympia title for the 5th time. The fat *******. Still, with a BMI of 30.5 he must be obese, Huge said so and he has a degree in biochemistry. Which bit of "For the general population" don't you understand? Or are you claiming he's entirely normal - which whould make him a somewhat surprising winner of a bodybuilding contest, since such a competition by its very nature is designed to find extraordinary people. Or have you just got a problem with people knowing more about a subject than you? |
#7
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Lardy ******* - Huge
The Medway Handyman wrote:
"swimming in Egypt" WTF does that mean? Anyone else know? In denial. -- Selah |
#8
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Lardy ******* - Huge
The Medway Handyman wrote:
Huge wrote: The Medway Handyman wrote: If you mean Body Mass Index its a totally discredited system. Do you really want to be killfiled? Why? Because I have an opinion thats different to yours? No, because you're an idiot. For God's Sake, Won't Somebody Think Of The Tools....... ? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Finally got that squirrel bastard! | Home Repair | |||
dirty bastard | Home Repair | |||
Cheap bastard | UK diy | |||
information on files (bastard, cross-cut, singel-cut, etc.) | Woodworking | |||
HUGE sprinking can | Metalworking |