Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wire nuts
Hi
I often see on American programs like this old house, wiring connections using 'wire nuts' ( the twist on type not crimp, which I've seen used in appliances like vacuum cleaner's) they seem useful and easy to use but have not seen them here are they legal in this country? If so, why do we prefere terminal blocks? Gordon |
#2
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wire nuts
I often see on American programs like this old house, wiring
connections using 'wire nuts' ( the twist on type not crimp, which I've seen used in appliances like vacuum cleaner's) they seem useful and easy to use but have not seen them here are they legal in this country? If so, why do we prefere terminal blocks? They are banned for the disgraceful fire causing murderous tat they are. They are one of the main reasons that the US has many times the likelihood of electrical fires and deaths. Strangely, the other main reason is the dangerously low voltage used in the states. Higher voltage leads to better fire safety (electrical fires kill many every year). You would think it would, however, lead to better shock safety. However, it doesn't, as the lower voltage leads to lower quality hardware and a poor attitude on the part of users, who think of the voltage as safe. Christian. |
#3
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wire nuts
On 21 Apr 2006 05:54:41 -0700 someone who may be "gordonpuk"
wrote this:- I often see on American programs like this old house, wiring connections using 'wire nuts' ( the twist on type not crimp, which I've seen used in appliances like vacuum cleaner's) they seem useful and easy to use but have not seen them here are they legal in this country? Not any more, thank goodness. You may encounter them in conduit wiring done up to the 1960s. Best removed if encountered. -- David Hansen, Edinburgh I will *always* explain revoked encryption keys, unless RIP prevents me http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2000/00023--e.htm#54 |
#4
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wire nuts
gordonpuk wrote:
Hi I often see on American programs like this old house, wiring connections using 'wire nuts' ( the twist on type not crimp, which I've seen used in appliances like vacuum cleaner's) they seem useful and easy to use but have not seen them here are they legal in this country? If so, why do we prefere terminal blocks? Gordon Wire and nuts are 2 things that should never go together |
#5
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wire nuts
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:04:16 +0100, "Christian McArdle"
wrote: I often see on American programs like this old house, wiring connections using 'wire nuts' ( the twist on type not crimp, which I've seen used in appliances like vacuum cleaner's) they seem useful and easy to use but have not seen them here are they legal in this country? If so, why do we prefere terminal blocks? They are banned for the disgraceful fire causing murderous tat they are. They are one of the main reasons that the US has many times the likelihood of electrical fires and deaths. Strangely, the other main reason is the dangerously low voltage used in the states. Higher voltage leads to better fire safety (electrical fires kill many every year). You would think it would, however, lead to better shock safety. However, it doesn't, as the lower voltage leads to lower quality hardware and a poor attitude on the part of users, who think of the voltage as safe. Christian. What is it, in your opinion, about wire nuts that 'causes' a fire? I have lived in North America for many years, used wire nuts extensively and have never seen a problem. Of course, if improperly used or incorrectly installed problems may result but that is not exclusive to wire nuts. The popular way here to join wires seems to be to twist wires together and slap a turn or two of insulation tape round the result. Hardly an improvement on wire nuts! |
#6
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wire nuts
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006 07:19:20 +0100, Edward W. Thompson
wrote: What is it, in your opinion, about wire nuts that 'causes' a fire? I have lived in North America for many years, used wire nuts extensively and have never seen a problem. The problem is that the joining faces of the two wires are not in tight contact and light corrosion increases the joint resistance which causes slight heating. This in turn loosens the joint more as it expands and contracts as power is applied and removed which in turn worsens the corrosion and increases the resistance until such time as the joint overheats sufficiently to fail or cause a fire. Aluminium cable is particularly good at failing in this way. Of course, if improperly used or incorrectly installed problems may result but that is not exclusive to wire nuts. The popular way here to join wires seems to be to twist wires together and slap a turn or two of insulation tape round the result. Hardly an improvement on wire nuts! Not much perhaps - but it is an improvement as the tape excludes moisture far better than a wire nut does. -- Peter Parry. http://www.wpp.ltd.uk/ |
#7
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wire nuts
In article ,
Edward W. Thompson wrote: What is it, in your opinion, about wire nuts that 'causes' a fire? I have lived in North America for many years, used wire nuts extensively and have never seen a problem. Of course, if improperly used or incorrectly installed problems may result but that is not exclusive to wire nuts. The popular way here to join wires seems to be to twist wires together and slap a turn or two of insulation tape round the result. Hardly an improvement on wire nuts! If you think that's the popular way, change your friends. -- *How many roads must a man travel down before he admits he is lost? Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#8
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wire nuts
Does that include DIY nuts ??
Wire and nuts are 2 things that should never go together |
#9
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wire nuts
In article ,
Edward W. Thompson writes: What is it, in your opinion, about wire nuts that 'causes' a fire? I There's no way to know you have a good connection. With a screw terminal, you usually give a good tug on the wire afterwards. Occasionally it comes out because you didn't get it under the screw, but that's an easy check. If you give a good tug on a wirenut, you risk damaging the connection, even if it had been OK. They rely on the copper binding to itself when twisted, and completely hide the creation of the joint and the end result from view. They don't come close to the quality of connection from a compressive screw or crimp connection, which is what the rest of the world moved to over 50 years ago. I've watched electricians (who have to quite regularly replace burned out crappy US sockets in computer rooms) redoing the wirenuts, and one of the wires quite often pops out when putting the socket back into the box. Doubtless there are also many occasions where a badly made joint doesn't completely fall apart before the face plate is on the box. have lived in North America for many years, used wire nuts extensively and have never seen a problem. Of course, if improperly used or incorrectly installed problems may result but that is not exclusive to wire nuts. Other techniques are rather harder to get wrong in the first place, and much easier to instantly tell you got it wrong. The popular way here to join wires seems to be to twist wires together and slap a turn or two of insulation tape round the result. Hardly an improvement on wire nuts! Well, that's certainly not popular here, but it probably is an improvement in some respects as you can at least see the connection before you tape it up. A wirenut is a bit like doing the same thing with a blindfold on, and only taking the blindfold off after you taped up. ;-) -- Andrew Gabriel |
#10
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wire nuts
Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article , Edward W. Thompson wrote: What is it, in your opinion, about wire nuts that 'causes' a fire? I have lived in North America for many years, used wire nuts extensively and have never seen a problem. Of course, if improperly used or incorrectly installed problems may result but that is not exclusive to wire nuts. The popular way here to join wires seems to be to twist wires together and slap a turn or two of insulation tape round the result. Hardly an improvement on wire nuts! If you think that's the popular way, change your friends. Wire nuts are the spawn of the devil, *especially* in power installations. Tim |
#11
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wire nuts
FWIW they used to be called 'Screwits' or 'Midgets' and the larger ones
were called 'Normals'...that was interesting wasn't it? You can still buy a plastic version today made by Wieland [I think]. Any road-up, on the subject of terminal or 'choc bloc' does anybody know where it says that you can actually use the stuff? AFAIR 99% of the blocks have polyethylene insulation which has a lower melting point than the pvc cable and thus compromises the joint [or so the NICEIC bloke used to say] and the only acceptable types were porcelain and brass ones for use in churches [still in the Wiring of Curches guide] and ones made of Nylon 66 or the high temp versions. But as usual I stand to be corrected , as happens most of the time!! -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
#12
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wire nuts
In article ilgate.org,
"Grumpy owd man" writes: FWIW they used to be called 'Screwits' or 'Midgets' and the larger ones were called 'Normals'...that was interesting wasn't it? 'Screwits' was a trade name. "Dogs ********" was another name, given the way a pair of them would dangle below a knot in the two cables they joined. I don't think they still have any generally accepted name now in the UK, given how long ago they vanished from the scene. "Wire nuts" is an American name which would not be generally recognised in the UK. -- Andrew Gabriel |
#13
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wire nuts
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006 07:19:20 +0100, Edward W. Thompson
wrote: What is it, in your opinion, about wire nuts that 'causes' a fire? They have two faults. They're not gas-tight, and they're mechanically too strong a bond, relative to their contact force. Gas-tightness is the ability to resist corrosion developing over time. There's a moderate force applied over a small area, so that the pressure is high. This keeps the joint sealed and moisture out. It's why IDC connections have replaced screw connections in telephony (low power, noise sensitive). The mechanical problem isn't a problem itself, but it leads to a situation where you can make an electrically poor connection and not realise, because a mechanical tug test seems OK. I have lived in North America for many years, used wire nuts extensively and have never seen a problem. Then take a look at the US domestic fire statistics. These things are evil! |
#14
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wire nuts
In article ,
Andrew Gabriel wrote: "Wire nuts" is an American name which would not be generally recognised in the UK. That, to me, is a nut with holes drilled through it so it may be wired to stop it turning. Bit like a split pin system. -- *If vegetable oil comes from vegetables, where does baby oil come from? * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#15
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wire nuts
David Hansen wrote:
On 21 Apr 2006 05:54:41 -0700 someone who may be "gordonpuk" wrote this:- I often see on American programs like this old house, wiring connections using 'wire nuts' ( the twist on type not crimp, which I've seen used in appliances like vacuum cleaner's) they seem useful and easy to use but have not seen them here are they legal in this country? Not any more, thank goodness. You may encounter them in conduit wiring done up to the 1960s. Best removed if encountered. I found some in my parent's loft (wired when the house was built in 1966). I replaced immediately with a 30A circular junction box. -- Mark Please replace invalid and invalid with gmx and net to reply. |
#16
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wire nuts
The message
from "Dave Plowman (News)" contains these words: The popular way here to join wires seems to be to twist wires together and slap a turn or two of insulation tape round the result. Hardly an improvement on wire nuts! If you think that's the popular way, change your friends. Why? They get along like a house on fire. -- Skipweasel Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain. |
#17
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wire nuts
"Edward W. Thompson" wrote in message ... On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:04:16 +0100, "Christian McArdle" wrote: I often see on American programs like this old house, wiring connections using 'wire nuts' ( the twist on type not crimp, which I've seen used in appliances like vacuum cleaner's) they seem useful and easy to use but have not seen them here are they legal in this country? If so, why do we prefere terminal blocks? They are banned for the disgraceful fire causing murderous tat they are. They are one of the main reasons that the US has many times the likelihood of electrical fires and deaths. Strangely, the other main reason is the dangerously low voltage used in the states. Higher voltage leads to better fire safety (electrical fires kill many every year). You would think it would, however, lead to better shock safety. However, it doesn't, as the lower voltage leads to lower quality hardware and a poor attitude on the part of users, who think of the voltage as safe. Christian. What is it, in your opinion, about wire nuts that 'causes' a fire? I have lived in North America for many years, used wire nuts extensively and have never seen a problem. Of course, if improperly used or incorrectly installed problems may result but that is not exclusive to wire nuts. The popular way here to join wires seems to be to twist wires together and slap a turn or two of insulation tape round the result. Hardly an improvement on wire nuts! Amongst which part of the UK population is "The popular way here to join wires seems to be to twist wires together and slap a turn or two of insulation tape round the result"? -- Brian |
#18
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wire nuts
In article ,
Brian Sharrock wrote: Amongst which part of the UK population is "The popular way here to join wires seems to be to twist wires together and slap a turn or two of insulation tape round the result"? Bodgers. The only time this is satisfactory is with low voltage single core signal wiring like telephone cable. -- *INDECISION is the key to FLEXIBILITY * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#19
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wire nuts
In message , "Dave Plowman (News)"
writes In article , Edward W. Thompson wrote: What is it, in your opinion, about wire nuts that 'causes' a fire? I have lived in North America for many years, used wire nuts extensively and have never seen a problem. Of course, if improperly used or incorrectly installed problems may result but that is not exclusive to wire nuts. The popular way here to join wires seems to be to twist wires together and slap a turn or two of insulation tape round the result. Hardly an improvement on wire nuts! If you think that's the popular way, change your friends. Darwin will be along presently to resolve the problem ... -- geoff |
#20
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wire nuts
Andrew Gabriel wrote:
'Screwits' was a trade name. And/or "scruits" (ISTR). -- Andy |
#21
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wire nuts
In article ,
Andy Wade writes: Andrew Gabriel wrote: 'Screwits' was a trade name. And/or "scruits" (ISTR). Yes, you and Owain are correct. -- Andrew Gabriel |
#22
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wire nuts
On 21 Apr 2006 05:54:41 -0700,it is alleged that "gordonpuk"
spake thusly in uk.d-i-y: Hi I often see on American programs like this old house, wiring connections using 'wire nuts' ( the twist on type not crimp, which I've seen used in appliances like vacuum cleaner's) they seem useful and easy to use but have not seen them here are they legal in this country? If so, why do we prefere terminal blocks? Gordon Both are fine if used correctly. (IMO) To those stating wirenuts are illegal... cite please? [not trolling, genuinely interested why/when/how they were banned] -- "The most overlooked advantage of owning a computer is that if they foul up there's no law against whacking them around a bit." - Eric Porterfield. |
#23
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wire nuts
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 22:28:39 GMT, Chip
wrote: On 21 Apr 2006 05:54:41 -0700,it is alleged that "gordonpuk" spake thusly in uk.d-i-y: Hi I often see on American programs like this old house, wiring connections using 'wire nuts' ( the twist on type not crimp, which I've seen used in appliances like vacuum cleaner's) they seem useful and easy to use but have not seen them here are they legal in this country? If so, why do we prefere terminal blocks? Gordon Both are fine if used correctly. (IMO) To those stating wirenuts are illegal... cite please? [not trolling, genuinely interested why/when/how they were banned] I agree with you wire nuts are fine provided they are correctly installed. There are two types the twist on and the type that are a drilled brass boss with pinch screw with an external 'plastic cover' that screws over. The wire nut terminations should be housed in a steel 'junction' box. The crimp on type of connector is not a wire nut and is used for circuits such as telephone systems as they are here. The critical comment by respondent that wire nuts are not 'airtight' I find puzzling. Of course they are not and neither are any normal electrical connections made by other means. Why people consider wire nuts dangerous and cause fires I can't guess other than speculate they have no experience of using wire nuts. The suggestion by one respondent of using wire nuts on high power circuits gives an indication of lack of understanding of their use. Most North American homes are wood framed and hence any electrical fault that is not contained in a suitable enclosure, is likely to cause a fire whereas in a brick built construction if would be a minor consequence. |
#24
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wire nuts
The message
from Edward W. Thompson contains these words: The critical comment by respondent that wire nuts are not 'airtight' I find puzzling. Of course they are not and neither are any normal electrical connections made by other means. I suspect the important bit is that the pressure at the points of contact isn't high enough to preclude air getting in between the conductors which is a well known and serious problem. The conductor gets warm and oxidises nicely, leading to a higher impedance and so on. A proper high pressure gas tight connection forces the conductors together hard enough so that they're deformed and no air can get between the mating faces. This stops the problem at source. From the few wirenuts that I've met they couldn't possible achieve the sort of clamping pressure that a screw terminal in a junction box could and as a result lack the reliability. -- Skipweasel Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain. |
#25
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Wire nuts
Edward W. Thompson wrote:
I agree with you wire nuts are fine provided they are correctly installed. There are two types the twist on and the type that are a drilled brass boss with pinch screw with an external 'plastic cover' that screws over. Its the traditional screwless twist connects that are the problem. The wire nut terminations should be housed in a steel 'junction' box. according to who, and why? Theyre routinely not here. The critical comment by respondent that wire nuts are not 'airtight' I find puzzling. Of course they are not and neither are any normal electrical connections made by other means. a gastight connection is the basic requirement for any safe durable electrical connection. If not gastight, the touching surfaces oxidise and connection R goes up, producing heat, sometimes way too much heat. Wire nuts can not reliably achieve this, our chocolate blocks can. Why people consider wire nuts dangerous and cause fires I can't guess Most North American homes are wood framed and hence any electrical fault that is not contained in a suitable enclosure, is likely to cause a fire yes whereas in a brick built construction if would be a minor consequence. not at all. NT |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Old wire thicker than new wire? | Home Repair | |||
changing from 1.5V battery to 9V battery | Electronics | |||
Does coating stranded copper wire with solder cause any issues or break any codes? | Home Repair | |||
Three way switches with 12/2 wire? | Home Repair | |||
Bond all grounds together? | Home Repair |