Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Weight of a Bridgeport w/9"x32" Table?
Hi Guys,
Would anyone know the approximate weight of a Bridgeport J-Head with a 9x32" table? Thanks. Joe... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
JB wrote:
Hi Guys, Would anyone know the approximate weight of a Bridgeport J-Head with a 9x32" table? Thanks. Joe... I think it is about 1500 Lbs. I have one. Mine added 100 Lbs when I upgraded to a J head. Jon |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"JB" wrote in message ... Hi Guys, Would anyone know the approximate weight of a Bridgeport J-Head with a 9x32" table? Thanks. Joe... 2200 pounds |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
The offical Bridgeport weight for a 1J 9x48 is #2101
I can tell ya that 42" table weighs all of the 300+ pounds they say it does... so figure you are maybe #75 lighter... Dave "JB" wrote in message ... Hi Guys, Would anyone know the approximate weight of a Bridgeport J-Head with a 9x32" table? Thanks. Joe... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
JB wrote:
Hi Guys, Would anyone know the approximate weight of a Bridgeport J-Head with a 9x32" table? Does this have a dovetail ram or the older round ram? Does it have the 12" Y travel, or the ~9" travel of the old, smaller knee? The 9 x 32" sounds like the old, pre 1950's round ram, short knee machine. That's why I was throwing out about 1500 Lbs. It seems each update of the machine added significant weight. Certainly the bigger knee added a lot of weight. Jon |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Jon,
It has a dovetail ram. It originally had an M Head which has been replaced with a J Head. Thanks for the help. Joe... "Jon Elson" wrote in message ervers.com... JB wrote: Hi Guys, Would anyone know the approximate weight of a Bridgeport J-Head with a 9x32" table? Does this have a dovetail ram or the older round ram? Does it have the 12" Y travel, or the ~9" travel of the old, smaller knee? The 9 x 32" sounds like the old, pre 1950's round ram, short knee machine. That's why I was throwing out about 1500 Lbs. It seems each update of the machine added significant weight. Certainly the bigger knee added a lot of weight. Jon |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
ATP* writes:
2200 pounds No way. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Richard J Kinch" wrote in message .. . ATP* writes: 2200 pounds No way. That's out of one of the Bridgeport manuals. I can't weigh mine to verify it. Obviously the size of the table, head, power feed, etc. will make a difference. Hence approximate. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
ATP* writes:
2200 pounds No way. That's out of one of the Bridgeport manuals. What manual? There are claims on Web pages that seem to be highly overstated. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Richard J Kinch" wrote in message . .. ATP* writes: 2200 pounds No way. That's out of one of the Bridgeport manuals. What manual? There are claims on Web pages that seem to be highly overstated. It's hard to tell what original manual it came from, it's a copywrite expired type reprint. I believe the weight was meant to be for the vari-speed head, assembled gross weight. I have seen higher numbers on the web, which were probably shipping weights. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Impressions/Review of Craftsman Professional Table Saw | Woodworking | |||
Design of Regular Decagon Table | Woodworking | |||
Router Table Top Questions | Woodworking | |||
table saw aux table question | Woodworking | |||
Building an extension table. | Woodworking |