On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 4:55:17 PM UTC-4, Ed Huntress wrote:


Three and a half years into The One's administration, and the jobs picture
is no better than the day he took office.


There are 1.5 million more unemployed than in January, 2009.


And there are 8,245,105 more people in the US.

Why don't you look at the number EMPLOYED?:

Ja sure there are more people employed, but the economy is not growing at a rate as high as the rate of new people entering the work force. If we keep at this rate the number of unemployed will keep rising.

Here's private nonfarm employment:

http://tinyurl.com/d2zts5f

Here's total government employment:

http://tinyurl.com/c5a3f5s

Whoop! You mean, private employment has gone up -- as has total
employment -- while government employment has gone down??? What's a
Republican to do??

Easy vote for someone besides the incumbent.

Dan


--
Ed Huntress

wrote in message ...
On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 4:55:17 PM UTC-4, Ed Huntress wrote:


Three and a half years into The One's administration, and the jobs picture
is no better than the day he took office.


There are 1.5 million more unemployed than in January, 2009.


And there are 8,245,105 more people in the US.

Why don't you look at the number EMPLOYED?:

Ja sure there are more people employed, but the economy is not growing at a rate as high as the rate of new people entering the work force. If we keep at this rate the number of unemployed will keep rising.

Here's private nonfarm employment:

http://tinyurl.com/d2zts5f

Here's total government employment:

http://tinyurl.com/c5a3f5s

Whoop! You mean, private employment has gone up -- as has total
employment -- while government employment has gone down??? What's a
Republican to do??

Easy vote for someone besides the incumbent.

Dan


That won't change the fact that total employment has indeed gone up.

On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 14:49:32 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote:

On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 4:55:17 PM UTC-4, Ed Huntress wrote:


Three and a half years into The One's administration, and the jobs picture
is no better than the day he took office.


There are 1.5 million more unemployed than in January, 2009.


And there are 8,245,105 more people in the US.

Why don't you look at the number EMPLOYED?:

Ja sure there are more people employed, but the economy is not growing at a rate as high as the rate of new people entering the work force.

The percentage of the total US population -- including cildren,
seniors, and everyone else -- that is employed is 43%. The percentage
of private-sector jobs added, as a percentage of the population
increase from Jan. 2009 is...43%.

So, it's not a good situation, but the implication of the earlier
post, and your statement here, are incorrect.That is, if we don't keep
cutting government jobs. But it looks like that well is about dried
up.

If we keep at this rate the number of unemployed will keep rising.

Of course. And that would hold true if the unemployment rate was 1%.


Here's private nonfarm employment:

http://tinyurl.com/d2zts5f

Here's total government employment:

http://tinyurl.com/c5a3f5s

Whoop! You mean, private employment has gone up -- as has total
employment -- while government employment has gone down??? What's a
Republican to do??

Easy vote for someone besides the incumbent.

For those who can't do arithmetic, yes.

--
Ed Huntress


Dan


--
Ed Huntress

On 6/19/2012 3:31 PM, PrecisionmachinisT wrote:

wrote in message ...
On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 4:55:17 PM UTC-4, Ed Huntress wrote:


Three and a half years into The One's administration, and the jobs picture
is no better than the day he took office.


There are 1.5 million more unemployed than in January, 2009.


And there are 8,245,105 more people in the US.

Why don't you look at the number EMPLOYED?:

Ja sure there are more people employed, but the economy is not growing at a rate as high as the rate of new people entering the work force. If we keep at this rate the number of unemployed will keep rising.

Here's private nonfarm employment:

http://tinyurl.com/d2zts5f

Here's total government employment:

http://tinyurl.com/c5a3f5s

Whoop! You mean, private employment has gone up -- as has total
employment -- while government employment has gone down??? What's a
Republican to do??

Easy vote for someone besides the incumbent.

Dan


That won't change the fact that total employment has indeed gone up.

Total employment in January 2009 was 142,187,000. In May 2012 it was
142,287,000. In between, it fell to under 140,000,000 in July 2009 and
remained under that level until September 2011. Meanwhile, the labor
force participation rate has fallen steadily since January 2009, from
65.7% to the current level of 63.8%

On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 6:31:02 PM UTC-4, PrecisionmachinisT wrote:



That won't change the fact that total employment has indeed gone up.

That is true, but not very relevant since the total work force has gone up more.

Dan

wrote in message
...
On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 6:31:02 PM UTC-4, PrecisionmachinisT wrote:



That won't change the fact that total employment has indeed gone up.

That is true, but not very relevant since the total work force has gone up
more.


The wholesale cutback of government workers has been working quite well for
us then I can assume...

On 6/19/2012 8:31 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
On 6/19/2012 3:31 PM, PrecisionmachinisT wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 4:55:17 PM UTC-4, Ed Huntress wrote:


Three and a half years into The One's administration, and the jobs
picture
is no better than the day he took office.


There are 1.5 million more unemployed than in January, 2009.


And there are 8,245,105 more people in the US.

Why don't you look at the number EMPLOYED?:

Ja sure there are more people employed, but the economy is not
growing at a rate as high as the rate of new people entering the work
force. If we keep at this rate the number of unemployed will keep
rising.

Here's private nonfarm employment:

http://tinyurl.com/d2zts5f

Here's total government employment:

http://tinyurl.com/c5a3f5s

Whoop! You mean, private employment has gone up -- as has total
employment -- while government employment has gone down??? What's a
Republican to do??

Easy vote for someone besides the incumbent.

Dan


That won't change the fact that total employment has indeed gone up.

Total employment in January 2009 was 142,187,000. In May 2012 it was
142,287,000. In between, it fell to under 140,000,000 in July 2009 and
remained under that level until September 2011. Meanwhile, the labor
force participation rate has fallen steadily since January 2009, from
65.7% to the current level of 63.8%

That ****-face hasn't a clue, he's a troll...just ignore him and he's
eventually go away to troll some other NG.