wrote:
On Sep 10, 5:28 am, "John R. Carroll"


No, it's what I'm telling you now.
Were there ever a pig it's bush's economic policies. Those policies
lead the Bush administration to firmly embrace socialisn over the
last weekend - they nationalized the home mortgage industry without
as much as a peep from all of you American "Patriots".

Before you blame everything on Bush, you might check Barney Franks
involvement.

Why?
Henry Paulsen works directly for George W. Bush, not Barney Franks.
Paulsen, not Franks, decided what the mechanics would be and that this
action was what was required.
This is a little like giving Bush an authorization to use force as a tool
and then having the stupid ******* use as a justification to act like a
retard.



--

John R. Carroll
www.machiningsolution.com

The issue is a pretty good integrity test for this group right
here. There are a few who don't seem to have much of it.

Speaking of integrity, why don't you cite an example where
conservatives en-masse condemned a Democrat with a pregnant
teenage daughter? the very fact that you and I cannot think of
one is telling, because you know good and well it must be
happening every week or so. It's a non-issue, unless there are no
other issues. Your pontifications are bloated with
generalities and opinions, and very scant on facts. I'll bet you
have a mirror in front of your monitor so you can admire your
sage visage as you type. There is plenty of hypocrisy to go
around, and you certainly
have your share.

Chuckle...and Teddy Kennedy, who killed his pregnant girlfriend, by
drowning her in a car...is still a revered Democrat Icon

Gunner



What do you expect? You can put lipstick on a pig, but if you do,
the Democrats will run it for president.

"Don't try and be clever Beaver. They'll already be laughing at you
as it 's." - Wally Cleaver


Is that what they told you every day, when you were little?

No, it's what I'm telling you now.
Were there ever a pig it's bush's economic policies. Those policies lead
the
Bush administration to firmly embrace socialisn over the last weekend -
they
nationalized the home mortgage industry without as much as a peep from all
of you American "Patriots".
McCain fully endorses the administrations policies and you can put all of
the lipstick on that pig or McCain/Palin you like.
Both are ****ed up.

http://biz.yahoo.com/cnbc/080908/26603489.html
US Is "More Communist than China": Jim Rogers
Monday September 8, 1:36 pm ET

The nationalization of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shows that the U.S.
is "more communist than China right now" but its brand of socialism is
meant only for the rich, investor Jim Rogers, CEO of Rogers Holdings,
told CNBC Europe on Monday.

"America is more communist than China is right now. You can see that
this is welfare of the rich, it is socialism for the rich... it's just
bailing out financial institutions," Rogers said.


--

John R. Carroll
www.machiningsolution.com

So why are you telling that to a clown? He can't think or communicate like a
human so all he can do is honk his horn and make farting sounds. It's like
that commercial where the baby is buying stock and hires a clown with his
financial gains. The baby says, I underestimated the creepiness factor of
hiring a clown. That is what you're doing with Terrell. He's too creepy to
deal with. I think you must have just forgotten. Don't waste time with a
clown like him. I know I won't.

Hawke

I missed the Staff meeting, but the Memos showed that Gunner
wrote on Tue, 09 Sep 2008 23:15:48
-0700 in rec.crafts.metalworking :
On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 17:15:31 -0500, RB wrote:


The issue is a pretty good integrity test for this group right here. There
are a few who don't seem to have much of it.

Speaking of integrity, why don't you cite an example where conservatives
en-masse condemned a Democrat with a pregnant teenage daughter? the
very fact that you and I cannot think of one is telling, because you
know good and well it must be happening every week or so. It's a
non-issue, unless there are no other issues.
Your pontifications are bloated with generalities and opinions, and
very scant on facts. I'll bet you have a mirror in front of your monitor
so you can admire your sage visage as you type.
There is plenty of hypocrisy to go around, and you certainly have
your share.


Chuckle...and Teddy Kennedy, who killed his pregnant girlfriend, by
drowning her in a car...is still a revered Democrat Icon

The fascinating element is contemplating the conniption fits which
the left would be throwing, had it come out that MCCain had not chosen
Palin "because she had a special needs child, and a pregnant unwed
daughter."

The fireworks would have been glorious.

pyotr
--
pyotr filipivich
"I had just been through hell and must have looked like death warmed
over walking into the saloon, because when I asked the bartender
whether they served zombies he said, ‘Sure, what'll you have?'"
from I Hear America Swinging by Peter DeVries

The issue is a pretty good integrity test for this group right here.
There
are a few who don't seem to have much of it.

Speaking of integrity, why don't you cite an example where conservatives
en-masse condemned a Democrat with a pregnant teenage daughter? the
very fact that you and I cannot think of one is telling, because you
know good and well it must be happening every week or so. It's a
non-issue, unless there are no other issues.
Your pontifications are bloated with generalities and opinions, and
very scant on facts. I'll bet you have a mirror in front of your monitor
so you can admire your sage visage as you type.
There is plenty of hypocrisy to go around, and you certainly have
your share.


Chuckle...and Teddy Kennedy, who killed his pregnant girlfriend, by
drowning her in a car...is still a revered Democrat Icon

The fascinating element is contemplating the conniption fits which
the left would be throwing, had it come out that MCCain had not chosen
Palin "because she had a special needs child, and a pregnant unwed
daughter."

The fireworks would have been glorious.

pyotr


I can't speak for the left and I know you sure as Hell can't. But I can say
If you told me a woman had a family to raise with five children in it and
the youngest one has Down's Syndrome, she had to be one hard working woman.
If you then threw in the fact that she was 44 years old AND had a pregnant
17 year old daughter I would think that woman won't get a moment's rest.
That is one heavy load for one person to bear. So if a woman in that
situation said that she had to turn down any other obligations because she
couldn't do her job as a mother and then have to take on even more
responsibilities I would think she was pretty wise. But Palin has shown me
two things; one is that she knew she was pregnant with a defective fetus and
went ahead and had the baby anyway, she also had to know that getting
pregnant at 43 was taking a big chance and what happened was not a surprise.
She also made the decision to have a huge responsibility for that family and
then go on and take on a full time political job too. Both of those
decisions look like stupid ones to me. When someone makes big choices like
she did it shows me her decision making ability, and it's not very good. Had
she decided that just raising that big family was plenty for her to handle
at this time I would have thought she had good sense. Now I don't

Hawke

Hawke wrote:

The issue is a pretty good integrity test for this group right here.
There
are a few who don't seem to have much of it.

Speaking of integrity, why don't you cite an example where conservatives
en-masse condemned a Democrat with a pregnant teenage daughter? the
very fact that you and I cannot think of one is telling, because you
know good and well it must be happening every week or so. It's a
non-issue, unless there are no other issues.
Your pontifications are bloated with generalities and opinions, and
very scant on facts. I'll bet you have a mirror in front of your monitor
so you can admire your sage visage as you type.
There is plenty of hypocrisy to go around, and you certainly have
your share.


Chuckle...and Teddy Kennedy, who killed his pregnant girlfriend, by
drowning her in a car...is still a revered Democrat Icon

The fascinating element is contemplating the conniption fits which
the left would be throwing, had it come out that MCCain had not chosen
Palin "because she had a special needs child, and a pregnant unwed
daughter."

The fireworks would have been glorious.

pyotr

I can't speak for the left and I know you sure as Hell can't. But I can say
If you told me a woman had a family to raise with five children in it and
the youngest one has Down's Syndrome, she had to be one hard working woman.
If you then threw in the fact that she was 44 years old AND had a pregnant
17 year old daughter I would think that woman won't get a moment's rest.
That is one heavy load for one person to bear. So if a woman in that
situation said that she had to turn down any other obligations because she
couldn't do her job as a mother and then have to take on even more
responsibilities I would think she was pretty wise. But Palin has shown me
two things; one is that she knew she was pregnant with a defective fetus and
went ahead and had the baby anyway, she also had to know that getting
pregnant at 43 was taking a big chance and what happened was not a surprise.
She also made the decision to have a huge responsibility for that family and
then go on and take on a full time political job too. Both of those
decisions look like stupid ones to me. When someone makes big choices like
she did it shows me her decision making ability, and it's not very good. Had
she decided that just raising that big family was plenty for her to handle
at this time I would have thought she had good sense. Now I don't

Hawke


In other words, Sarah Palin is able to handle things that would kill
you, and you are jealous of her.


--
You can put lipstick on a pig, but it will still be a Democrat.

"Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message
m...

Hawke wrote:

The issue is a pretty good integrity test for this group right
here.
There
are a few who don't seem to have much of it.

Speaking of integrity, why don't you cite an example where
conservatives
en-masse condemned a Democrat with a pregnant teenage daughter? the
very fact that you and I cannot think of one is telling, because you
know good and well it must be happening every week or so. It's a
non-issue, unless there are no other issues.
Your pontifications are bloated with generalities and opinions,
and
very scant on facts. I'll bet you have a mirror in front of your
monitor
so you can admire your sage visage as you type.
There is plenty of hypocrisy to go around, and you certainly
have
your share.


Chuckle...and Teddy Kennedy, who killed his pregnant girlfriend, by
drowning her in a car...is still a revered Democrat Icon

The fascinating element is contemplating the conniption fits which
the left would be throwing, had it come out that MCCain had not chosen
Palin "because she had a special needs child, and a pregnant unwed
daughter."

The fireworks would have been glorious.

pyotr

I can't speak for the left and I know you sure as Hell can't. But I can
say
If you told me a woman had a family to raise with five children in it
and
the youngest one has Down's Syndrome, she had to be one hard working
woman.
If you then threw in the fact that she was 44 years old AND had a
pregnant
17 year old daughter I would think that woman won't get a moment's rest.
That is one heavy load for one person to bear. So if a woman in that
situation said that she had to turn down any other obligations because
she
couldn't do her job as a mother and then have to take on even more
responsibilities I would think she was pretty wise. But Palin has shown
me
two things; one is that she knew she was pregnant with a defective fetus
and
went ahead and had the baby anyway, she also had to know that getting
pregnant at 43 was taking a big chance and what happened was not a
surprise.
She also made the decision to have a huge responsibility for that family
and
then go on and take on a full time political job too. Both of those
decisions look like stupid ones to me. When someone makes big choices
like
she did it shows me her decision making ability, and it's not very good.
Had
she decided that just raising that big family was plenty for her to
handle
at this time I would have thought she had good sense. Now I don't

Hawke


In other words, Sarah Palin is able to handle things that would kill
you, and you are jealous of her.


Trying to do more things at one time than you can handle competently is a
common mistake. As all of us know, except you, when you try to do two things
at the same time you do neither of them very well. Palin wants to do two
full time jobs at the same time. By definition she won't do either one of
them as well as she could if she just did one or the other. In your case
it's like walking and chewing gum at the same time. You do neither of them
well.

Hawke