Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Gasoline transport truck wrecks, burns under bridge...melts iron beams. Now why can't...?
On Sat, 3 Nov 2007 16:27:45 -0700, "Richard W."
wrote: "GatherNoMoss" wrote in message oups.com... ......Why couldn't a large jet passenger plane, full of fuel, that crashes into the World Trade Center building not have enough heat energy to soften it metal structure enough to cause it's collapse ? I ask the 9/11 conspiracy theorists this question....those who think it impossible that it could happen. My understanding is that is what happened. The use of asbestos to wrap the beams wasn't done on the twin towers. Due to the health risks. If it had more people could have gotten out and possibly the buildings might still be standing. This was talked about on the news, but not very much. Richard W. And what engineering school did you graduate from that taught you to wrap steel beams in asbestus? Bruce-in-Bangkok (Note:displayed e-mail address is a spam trap) |
#2
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Gasoline transport truck wrecks, burns under bridge...melts iron beams. Now why can't...?
Bruce in Bangkok wrote:
And what engineering school did you graduate from that taught you to wrap steel beams in asbestus? As I remember it was used to protect them from the heat of fire. http://www.mssm.edu/cpm/pdf/asbestos-faq.pdf Only part of the beam structurs were protected due to changing regulations on use. Sorta like the insulating foam problem on the shuttle, something that worked fine good wasn't PC anymore. Wes |
#3
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Gasoline transport truck wrecks, burns under bridge...melts iron beams. Now why can't...?
On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 15:34:45 -0500, Wes wrote:
Bruce in Bangkok wrote: And what engineering school did you graduate from that taught you to wrap steel beams in asbestus? As I remember it was used to protect them from the heat of fire. http://www.mssm.edu/cpm/pdf/asbestos-faq.pdf Only part of the beam structurs were protected due to changing regulations on use. Sorta like the insulating foam problem on the shuttle, something that worked fine good wasn't PC anymore. Wes Sprayed-fire resistant materials (SFRMs) were used to protect some structural steel elements in the towers, including all floor trusses and beams.[60] Gypsum wallboard in combination with SFRMs, or in some cases gypsum wallboard alone, was used to protect core columns.[60] Vermiculite plaster was used on the interior-side and SFRMs on the other three sides of the perimeter columns for fire protection.[60] The 1968 New York City building codes were more lenient in some aspects of fire protection, such as allowing three exit stairwells in the World Trade Center towers, instead of six as required under older building codes.[61] My point was that asbestus wasn't used.. like lead based paint it is now pretty much forbidden. Bruce-in-Bangkok (Note:displayed e-mail address is a spam trap) |
#4
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Gasoline transport truck wrecks, burns under bridge...melts iron beams. Now why can't...?
On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 15:34:45 -0500, Wes wrote:
Bruce in Bangkok wrote: And what engineering school did you graduate from that taught you to wrap steel beams in asbestus? As I remember it was used to protect them from the heat of fire. http://www.mssm.edu/cpm/pdf/asbestos-faq.pdf Only part of the beam structurs were protected due to changing regulations on use. Sorta like the insulating foam problem on the shuttle, something that worked fine good wasn't PC anymore. Wes There was a move from asbestos to gypsum plaster or mineral fibre cement slurry, sprayed on. It works well and doesn't give you cancer. None of them work well when you knock them with a jet airliner at speed. IIRC some of the WTC was asbestos, some was plaster/ mineral fibre. Geoff |
#5
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
Gasoline transport truck wrecks, burns under bridge...melts iron beams. Now why can't...?
"Bruce in Bangkok" wrote in message ... On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 15:34:45 -0500, Wes wrote: Bruce in Bangkok wrote: And what engineering school did you graduate from that taught you to wrap steel beams in asbestus? As I remember it was used to protect them from the heat of fire. http://www.mssm.edu/cpm/pdf/asbestos-faq.pdf Only part of the beam structurs were protected due to changing regulations on use. Sorta like the insulating foam problem on the shuttle, something that worked fine good wasn't PC anymore. Wes Sprayed-fire resistant materials (SFRMs) were used to protect some structural steel elements in the towers, including all floor trusses and beams.[60] Gypsum wallboard in combination with SFRMs, or in some cases gypsum wallboard alone, was used to protect core columns.[60] Vermiculite plaster was used on the interior-side and SFRMs on the other three sides of the perimeter columns for fire protection.[60] The 1968 New York City building codes were more lenient in some aspects of fire protection, such as allowing three exit stairwells in the World Trade Center towers, instead of six as required under older building codes.[61] My point was that asbestus wasn't used.. like lead based paint it is now pretty much forbidden. That was my point, they didn't use the stuff. According to the news the older buildings did use it. All I did was quote what the news guy said. Plonk Richard W. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|