Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Metalworking (rec.crafts.metalworking) Discuss various aspects of working with metal, such as machining, welding, metal joining, screwing, casting, hardening/tempering, blacksmithing/forging, spinning and hammer work, sheet metal work. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
seneca falls star lathe update, redrive
FINALLY got the redrive "done". i felt quite proud of it (though it
took an embarrassingly long time to do). still have to do the electrical wiring to the motor (drum switch, 220 volt, etc.) "fired it up" today. thank GOD it worked ok first time! my crazy project. there's no way this lathe could be worth the time, energy, money i've put into it so far. still haven't cut anything with it yet. thanks to those who've offered advice/assistance. b.w. www.frontiernet.net/~wwixon/redrive1.jpg 59kb www.frontiernet.net/~wwixon/redrive2.jpg 45kb www.frontiernet.net/~wwixon/redrive3.jpg 54kb www.frontiernet.net/~wwixon/redrive4.jpg 613kb www.frontiernet.net/~wwixon/redrive5.jpg 130kb www.frontiernet.net/~wwixon/redrive6.jpg 130kb www.frontiernet.net/~wwixon/redrive7.jpg 611kb |
#2
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
seneca falls star lathe update, redrive
Extremely cool!
Congrats on nice work! Especially the part about it working first time! "William Wixon" wrote in message ... FINALLY got the redrive "done". i felt quite proud of it (though it took an embarrassingly long time to do). still have to do the electrical wiring to the motor (drum switch, 220 volt, etc.) "fired it up" today. thank GOD it worked ok first time! snip |
#3
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
seneca falls star lathe update, redrive
According to William Wixon :
FINALLY got the redrive "done". i felt quite proud of it (though it took an embarrassingly long time to do). still have to do the electrical wiring to the motor (drum switch, 220 volt, etc.) "fired it up" today. thank GOD it worked ok first time! my crazy project. there's no way this lathe could be worth the time, energy, money i've put into it so far. still haven't cut anything with it yet. thanks to those who've offered advice/assistance. b.w. www.frontiernet.net/~wwixon/redrive1.jpg 59kb [ ... ] www.frontiernet.net/~wwixon/redrive7.jpg 611kb Those look nice. Are you now tempted to refinish the rest of the machine? Did you build the entire motor support, or is this just a refurbishment of the original motor and layshaft supports? I see that the last shot was taken at 1/18th of a second, which explains why the spokes of the large pulley are not visible. And I also see that you used a Fuji FinePix1300 to take the shots. And -- the last shot was taken at 2006:04:10 16:24:05 according to the camera's clock. Enjoy, DoN. -- Email: | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564 (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero --- |
#4
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
seneca falls star lathe update, redrive
In article , William Wixon says...
my crazy project. there's no way this lathe could be worth the time, energy, money i've put into it so far. still haven't cut anything with it yet. Watch out. This lathe has NO lockout to prevent you from engaging the half nuts and the longitudinal feed at the same time. If you do this you *will* blow something up in the leadscrew drivetrain. I may have mentioned this to you at some time in the past, it's my standard "Star" lathe caveat. Jim -- ================================================== please reply to: JRR(zero) at pkmfgvm4 (dot) vnet (dot) ibm (dot) com ================================================== |
#5
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
seneca falls star lathe update, redrive
You did spend some time on that, you even put down white sheets for the
pics. I need you here for a few weeks to take of some projects. careful with your fingers on that one, don't let a cat in the room while running. "William Wixon" wrote in message ... FINALLY got the redrive "done". i felt quite proud of it (though it took an embarrassingly long time to do). still have to do the electrical wiring to the motor (drum switch, 220 volt, etc.) "fired it up" today. thank GOD it worked ok first time! my crazy project. there's no way this lathe could be worth the time, energy, money i've put into it so far. still haven't cut anything with it yet. thanks to those who've offered advice/assistance. b.w. www.frontiernet.net/~wwixon/redrive1.jpg 59kb www.frontiernet.net/~wwixon/redrive2.jpg 45kb www.frontiernet.net/~wwixon/redrive3.jpg 54kb www.frontiernet.net/~wwixon/redrive4.jpg 613kb www.frontiernet.net/~wwixon/redrive5.jpg 130kb www.frontiernet.net/~wwixon/redrive6.jpg 130kb www.frontiernet.net/~wwixon/redrive7.jpg 611kb |
#6
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
seneca falls star lathe update, redrive
thanks for your replies, replies to everyone below...
"Adam Smith" wrote in message ... Extremely cool! Congrats on nice work! Especially the part about it working first time! thanks very much Adam. (whew! i was fishing for a compliment! was afraid with the crabby old machinists here on this list not only would i not get a compliment i might get a kick in the ass.) "DoN. Nichols" wrote in message ... Those look nice. Are you now tempted to refinish the rest of the machine? Did you build the entire motor support, or is this just a refurbishment of the original motor and layshaft supports? I see that the last shot was taken at 1/18th of a second, which explains why the spokes of the large pulley are not visible. And I also see that you used a Fuji FinePix1300 to take the shots. And -- the last shot was taken at 2006:04:10 16:24:05 according to the camera's clock. Enjoy, DoN. hi don, i like the rustic look of the rest of the machine, don't wanna disturb the patina. :-) heck yeah i built the entire thang from scratch. whew! that was a workout. (thought you and others would remember the way the "ugly" (my words) original was.) here's the pic of the original... waddaya call it...? "motor and layshaft supports"? http://www.frontiernet.net/~wwixon/lathe6a.jpg (all i intend to re-use is the step pulley and the barrel switch) (and some of the steel bar stock) that's pretty amazing you were able to glean all that info from my pics. i didn't know that information was encoded in them. how'd you do that!? jeez, i almost felt violated. funny you know the make and model of my camera, if someone were to ask me i'd have to tell them i don't know/can't remember! here's a picture that i thought was funny. is this one 1/18 of a second also? (it's turning/running) (used the flash) (it even stopped the pulley on the motor!) http://www.frontiernet.net/~wwixon/redrive8.jpg thanks for the compliment. "jim rozen" wrote in message ... Watch out. This lathe has NO lockout to prevent you from engaging the half nuts and the longitudinal feed at the same time. If you do this you *will* blow something up in the leadscrew drivetrain. I may have mentioned this to you at some time in the past, it's my standard "Star" lathe caveat. Jim yeah Jim, thanks, i remember you said that. sorry i didn't send you a thank you directly, i went to try to find your address in the replies i got to my original post and got distracted and forgot. thanks for making the pics of your star lathe available to me. now the only thing is for me to figure out what a half nut and a longitudinal feed is. :-) i'm kidding, i do believe i know what the half nut is by taking apart the saddle and i assume the longitudinal feed is what makes the tool holder move toward and away from the operator... but i am still completely unsure how to activate them and am afraid to blow it up. today i was figuring i'm going to need to get a copy of that south bend "how to operate a lathe" book. hope that'll tell me. usually i fiddle around with a thing to figure out how to use it but in this case it seems i can actually cause real damage by fiddling around with it to figure out how it works and so am afraid to do so. somehow the controls on the saddle do not make sense. it seems as if if i move a lever or turn a knob it causes the other knobs/handles to do something else and if i switch them around they do something completely different, not getting repeatable results. oh, and one more thing, the handle that slides/moves the saddle along the ways, it's very stiff and tight, not at ALL smooth. i'm assuming i'm going to have to take it apart and put in some shims somewhere, haven't gotten to that yet. thanks again for the important tip! (the gears inside the saddle have already been chipped/"exploded" but there's enough teeth left on each one that it can operate ok.) (i was hoping you'd get a kick out of how i routed the vee belt) ----- Original Message ----- From: "wayne mak" Newsgroups: rec.crafts.metalworking Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 9:53 PM Subject: seneca falls star lathe update, redrive You did spend some time on that, you even put down white sheets for the pics. I need you here for a few weeks to take of some projects. careful with your fingers on that one, don't let a cat in the room while running. chuckle i remember you're not all that far from me here. yeah, really, careful w/ fingers. when i saw the old catalogs of the old seneca falls lathes some of them have (cast iron) covers over some of the gears and i was like "what pussies! i don't need no steenkin' covers" but when it was running i was like "jeez, this fukin' thing is a finger muncher monster!" i keep having the compulsion to wipe away the oil that's spitting out of it and have to keep telling myself to promise myself to never get my hands near the gears/pulleys while it's running. (the spitting oil was an unanticipated characteristic, i figure being born and raised entirely in the last half of the 20th century and having known only "permanently sealed bearings" i had no idea of the characteristics of a "total loss" machinery oil system. :-) (about the cats) |
#7
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
seneca falls star lathe update, redrive
According to William Wixon :
thanks for your replies, replies to everyone below... "DoN. Nichols" wrote in message ... Those look nice. Are you now tempted to refinish the rest of the machine? Did you build the entire motor support, or is this just a refurbishment of the original motor and layshaft supports? [ ... ] hi don, i like the rustic look of the rest of the machine, don't wanna disturb the patina. :-) heck yeah i built the entire thang from scratch. whew! that was a workout. (thought you and others would remember the way the "ugly" (my words) original was.) I sort of remember it -- but not the details. here's the pic of the original... waddaya call it...? "motor and layshaft supports"? http://www.frontiernet.net/~wwixon/lathe6a.jpg (all i intend to re-use is the step pulley and the barrel switch) (and some of the steel bar stock) O.K. that's pretty amazing you were able to glean all that info from my pics. i didn't know that information was encoded in them. how'd you do that!? There are a bunch of programs which do varying degrees of recovering the "exif" information from image files. The program which I currently use is a perl program called "exiftool". jeez, i almost felt violated. funny you know the make and model of my camera, if someone were to ask me i'd have to tell them i don't know/can't remember! There are something like sixty lines of information which your camera puts into the file, including the maker and model name. However -- if you have run the photo through some program which modifies the image, the new file will not have that information encoded in it -- unless you jump through hoops to preserve it. I thought to run the image through exiftool to see what camera took the shots, since: 1) The image name was a typical camera image name, so there was a chance that it was the raw image from the camera. 2) The size was large enough so the odds were also that it was the unmodified image from the camera. If you want to keep from making this information available to the world, load into a program and re-save it to a new filename -- even if you don't do anything to the image, and that will strip off the exif info. My Nikon D70 (A SLR which uses the lenses from the old film cameras) even encodes in there the orientation of the camera (normal, tilted 90 degrees to the left, tilted 90 degrees to the right, or (possibly) inverted. This is so programs which are displaying the images can automatically rotate them to the proper position on your screen. And one of the things that the D70 will do is to encode a short text string in there. I use it for an attempt at a copyright claim in the images. here's a picture that i thought was funny. is this one 1/18 of a second also? I can't tell on this one. You used some program to perhaps crop the image, and all that exif tool says about it is the following: ================================================== ==================== ExifTool Version Number : 5.05 File Name : redrive8.jpg File Size : 49KB File Type : JPEG Image Width : 433 Image Height : 639 Image Size : 433x639 ================================================== ==================== (it's turning/running) (used the flash) (it even stopped the pulley on the motor!) Flash, combined with slow shutter speeds can give a nice effect. There are modes on the Nikon to select to do this on purpose. http://www.frontiernet.net/~wwixon/redrive8.jpg thanks for the compliment. You're welcome. It was a nice job. I wish that I could weld and make things that look like that. "jim rozen" wrote in message ... Watch out. This lathe has NO lockout to prevent you from engaging the half nuts and the longitudinal feed at the same time. If you do this you *will* blow something up in the leadscrew drivetrain. [ ... ] yeah Jim, thanks, i remember you said that. sorry i didn't send you a thank you directly, i went to try to find your address in the replies i got to my original post and got distracted and forgot. thanks for making the pics of your star lathe available to me. now the only thing is for me to figure out what a half nut and a longitudinal feed is. :-) i'm kidding, i do believe i know what the half nut is by taking apart the saddle and i assume the longitudinal feed is what makes the tool holder move toward and away from the operator... Actually -- no. The longitudinal feed is in the same direction that the half-nuts move the carriage -- but much slower, giving finer feed (and a nicer finish), and reducing wear on the leadscrew to save it purely for threading. What you have described is called the cross-feed, which is usually present on a lathe which also has the longitudinal feed. Typically, there is a lever or clutch which will engage either, and select either. I've seen lathes with two clutch levers, one for longitudinal and one for cross feed, allowing them both to be engaged at the same time, to cut a nice 60 degree taper. My Clausing has no clutch, just gears, and the lever slides in a z-shaped slot, so to the right and up is longitudinal feed, and to the left and down is cross-feed. But this machine *does* have an interlock so you can't engage the half nuts when either fine feed is in use, and you can't engage either fine feed when the half-nuts are in use, thus avoiding the calamity which Jim described. but i am still completely unsure how to activate them and am afraid to blow it up. Half nuts are typically engaged by moving a lever to the right side of the apron to a down position, at which point the carriage will move fairly fast (depending on the threading gearing). I would have to look at the photos of the apron of your lathe to see what controls you have which engage longitudinal and cross feeds. Sometimes, there is a star wheel which allows you to gradually engage the clutch, and allows it to slip if necessary. Identify the half-nut lever and the handwheel which moves the carriage. Everything else is most likely longitudinal and cross feed. And as long as you don't have the half-nuts engaged, you can play with the others with no problems (as long as you stop them before the carriage reaches the chuck or the tailstock. :-) today i was figuring i'm going to need to get a copy of that south bend "how to operate a lathe" book. hope that'll tell me. It will tell you how South Bend lathes do this. They are somewhat different from my Clausing, and yet again different from a Sheldon ... usually i fiddle around with a thing to figure out how to use it but in this case it seems i can actually cause real damage by fiddling around with it to figure out how it works and so am afraid to do so. somehow the controls on the saddle do not make sense. it seems as if if i move a lever or turn a knob it causes the other knobs/handles to do something else and if i switch them around they do something completely different, not getting repeatable results. Interesting. Disengage the feed to the leadscrew (the reversing lever on the headstock should have a neutral position), and then you can play with the controls without damaging anything -- but also without it doing anything useful. oh, and one more thing, the handle that slides/moves the saddle along the ways, it's very stiff and tight, not at ALL smooth. The handwheel? This may imply that you have a longitudinal feed lever engaged with the clutch set to allow you to override it by enough hand force. i'm assuming i'm going to have to take it apart and put in some shims somewhere, haven't gotten to that yet. thanks again for the important tip! (the gears inside the saddle have already been chipped/"exploded" but there's enough teeth left on each one that it can operate ok.) Are you sure? This may be why you are having strange behavior. Good Luck, DoN. -- Email: | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564 (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero --- |
#8
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
seneca falls star lathe update, redrive
hey don,
thanks for your detailed response. my responses/further questions below... took a photo of the "saddle"/"carriage" and uploaded it... http://www.frontiernet.net/~wwixon/handles.jpg "DoN. Nichols" wrote in message ... -snip- You're welcome. It was a nice job. I wish that I could weld and make things that look like that. thanks again :-) -snip- Actually -- no. The longitudinal feed is in the same direction that the half-nuts move the carriage -- but much slower, giving finer feed (and a nicer finish), and reducing wear on the leadscrew to save it purely for threading. wow, i REALLY don't understand that. i've used a lathe before but just don't konw what the parts are called. the lathe i used (and this lathe) i can move the tool holder/"saddle" side to side along teh ways with the handle "1" (rapidly and imprecicely) or move the tool holder/"saddle" slowly (but precicely) with teh long screw under the ways (assuming that's called the lead screw). are you saying the handle that moves teh saddle rapidly but imprecicely is called the longitudinal feed? when the half nuts are engaged (they're engaged onto the lead screw) it moves the carriage slowly. i don't get what you're saying at all. What you have described is called the cross-feed, which is usually present on a lathe which also has the longitudinal feed. thanks. "cross feed" Typically, there is a lever or clutch which will engage either, and select either. I've seen lathes with two clutch levers, one for i think maybe knob "2" is a clutch. longitudinal and one for cross feed, allowing them both to be engaged at the same time, to cut a nice 60 degree taper. My Clausing has no clutch, just gears, and the lever slides in a z-shaped slot, so to the right and up is longitudinal feed, and to the left and down is cross-feed. But this machine *does* have an interlock so you can't engage the half nuts when either fine feed is in use, and you can't engage either fine feed when the half-nuts are in use, thus avoiding the calamity which Jim described. Half nuts are typically engaged by moving a lever to the right side of the apron to a down position, at which point the carriage will move fairly fast (depending on the threading gearing). there is a replacement part made of aluminum "4" that engages the half nut (or what appears to me to be a nut sliced in half, so i figure that must be a half nut) (this replacement part, i was impressed by whoever made it, seemed like a somewhat complicated piece of mill work.) i'm a little worried though, seems to me that it weighs enough/is loose enough that it can flop down and engage itself. i'm trying to figure out a way to hook up a spring or bungee or something to prevent it from flopping down and engaging the half nut "without my permission". I would have to look at the photos of the apron of your lathe to see what controls you have which engage longitudinal and cross feeds. thanks for helping me with this! (!!!) (like i said before, i usually just fiddle around with a thing to figure it out on my own, i enjoy doing it that way, but in this case there seems to be the possibility that i can cause real irreparible (no replacement parts available) damage if i **** something up here.) Sometimes, there is a star wheel which allows you to gradually engage the clutch, and allows it to slip if necessary. could the star wheel be "2"? Identify the half-nut lever and the handwheel which moves the i got the half nut lever and the carriage hand wheel... and have been fiddling with them, but am afraid to advance any furhter. (and as i mentioned, the carraige hand wheel is VERY stiff, jerky, rough.) carriage. Everything else is most likely longitudinal and cross feed. And as long as you don't have the half-nuts engaged, you can play with the others with no problems (as long as you stop them before the carriage reaches the chuck or the tailstock. :-) last night i tried engaging the lead screw and moving the carriage left to right under power, which was fun. moved surprisingly slowly. then i changed the direction of the leadscrew (with teh handle on the headstock) and it seemed like the motion was rough, maybe as if something was being FORCED, didn't like that and so stopped doing it. seemed as if the gears in the headstock, when they were configured to move the opposite way, didn't like it at all. It will tell you how South Bend lathes do this. They are somewhat different from my Clausing, and yet again different from a Sheldon ... thanks. Interesting. Disengage the feed to the leadscrew (the reversing lever on the headstock should have a neutral position), and then you can i've had the lever in the neutral position, afraid to engage the lead screw drive. play with the controls without damaging anything -- but also without it doing anything useful. chuckle (i went to art school, this project has been for me at least partially a creative expression/outlet, hope though this lathe won't end up being entirely a kinetic sculpture.) The handwheel? This may imply that you have a longitudinal feed i wouldn't have thought it would be called a handwheel. what in the heck is it called now, the word excapes me now, not a lever, not a knob, "handle", what's it called? do they refer to this thing as a handwheel even though there's no "wheel" component to it? "crank"? lever engaged with the clutch set to allow you to override it by enough oh! is the longitudinal feel lever the thing on the headstock that makes the lead screw rotate?! hand force. Are you sure? This may be why you are having strange behavior. it seemed as if there were enough of a tooth remaining on each of the broken teeth to uninterruptedly engage the mating gear. Good Luck, DoN. in my photo... http://www.frontiernet.net/~wwixon/handles.jpg "1" moves the carriage from left to right/right to left. (is very stiff and jerky. i think the pinion gear might need to be shimmed or something, i think maybe it's too tightly crammed up into the "rack" gear under the bed/ways. is that what they're called, "rack and pinion"?) "2" seems to be a clutch that makes "6" turn but i think it also makes "1" turn too, not sure what "2" does. screw it in, tightens up and engages something inside, turn it the opposite way and loosens, disengages whatever it was it engaged. "3" flops up and down from position "a." to position "b.", tighten the knob to make it stay at either position. (i'm very confused as to what this handle does.) "4" engages/disengages the, i assume, "half nut". "5" what do you guys call that one? transverse feed? "6" moves the tool holder toward or away from the operator. this handle will rotate under power of the lathe. whew! thanks. b.w. |
#9
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking
|
|||
|
|||
seneca falls star lathe update, redrive
According to William Wixon :
hey don, thanks for your detailed response. my responses/further questions below... took a photo of the "saddle"/"carriage" and uploaded it... http://www.frontiernet.net/~wwixon/handles.jpg O.K. This will help greatly. (Though I must admit that I missed the mention of the image the first time through and I was quite puzzled at the references to numbers until I got to the bottom and the image URL was mentioned again. "DoN. Nichols" wrote in message ... [ ... ] Actually -- no. The longitudinal feed is in the same direction that the half-nuts move the carriage -- but much slower, giving finer feed (and a nicer finish), and reducing wear on the leadscrew to save it purely for threading. wow, i REALLY don't understand that. i've used a lathe before but just don't konw what the parts are called. the lathe i used (and this lathe) i can move the tool holder/"saddle" side to side along teh ways with the handle "1" (rapidly and imprecicely) This is what I was calling the "handwheel". It normally is a steel or cast iron wheel with a polished rim and a crank handle sticking out at one point only. The wheel is easier to use for fine control, and the crank for coarse control. or move the tool holder/"saddle" slowly (but precicely) with teh long screw under the ways (assuming that's called the lead screw). That is the leadscrew (or at least the main "threading" leadscrew). There are two others within the range of what you have photographed -- one which achieves the "cross feed", and is turned by the crank you have labeled "6". The other moves the "compound" (the section which can be set at different angles), and that one is turned by the crank which you label "5". The crank on that one frequently has two crank handles, allowing you to achieve fine motion by the thumb on one and the index finger on the other. are you saying the handle that moves teh saddle rapidly but imprecicely is called the longitudinal feed? No -- it moves the carriage in the longitudinal direction. The leadscrew and half nuts moves the carriage much more rapidly and precisely in the same direction -- and should be used only for threading -- assuming that you have a true longitudinal feed in your apron. I am using the term "longitudinal feed" as a term for a capability, not a control. More on this a bit later. (If I don't forget. :-) when the half nuts are engaged (they're engaged onto the lead screw) it moves the carriage slowly. i don't get what you're saying at all. It moves the carriage fairly rapidly -- depending on how fast the leadscrew is rotating. This is changed by the gears between the spindle and the leadscrew (and by a quick-change gearbox in a lathe with is recent enough). What you have described is called the cross-feed, which is usually present on a lathe which also has the longitudinal feed. thanks. "cross feed" Crank "6" is the cross-feed crank. However (as you have discovered) it can be driven by gearing in the apron, and this is typically quite slow, and we can call that "power cross feed" to avoid confusion with the function of the crank itself. Typically, there is a lever or clutch which will engage either, and select either. I've seen lathes with two clutch levers, one for i think maybe knob "2" is a clutch. It looks right to be a clutch. [ ... ] Half nuts are typically engaged by moving a lever to the right side of the apron to a down position, at which point the carriage will move fairly fast (depending on the threading gearing). there is a replacement part made of aluminum "4" that engages the half nut (or what appears to me to be a nut sliced in half, so i figure that must be a half nut) It is. I suspect that this once had a longer name, such as "half nut coupling" or something similar, and it got shortened by use habits. (this replacement part, i was impressed by whoever made it, seemed like a somewhat complicated piece of mill work.) i'm a little worried though, seems to me that it weighs enough/is loose enough that it can flop down and engage itself. i'm trying to figure out a way to hook up a spring or bungee or something to prevent it from flopping down and engaging the half nut "without my permission". Hmm ... there *should* be a notch in a part of it inside the apron into which a spring-loaded ball or something similar is pressed to keep the half-nuts from engaging volutarily. You will probably need to take the apron apart -- and possibly put up more photos for us to analyze -- to figure this out. [ ... ] Sometimes, there is a star wheel which allows you to gradually engage the clutch, and allows it to slip if necessary. could the star wheel be "2"? Yes. Not a star in this case -- though the South Bend manual will probably show one. Identify the half-nut lever and the handwheel which moves the i got the half nut lever and the carriage hand wheel... and have been fiddling with them, but am afraid to advance any furhter. (and as i mentioned, the carraige hand wheel is VERY stiff, jerky, rough.) I *think* that you are being fought by the "longitudinal power feed". Your part "3" looks like a selector to choose between (power) cross feed and (power) longitudinal feed. You say that it flops around as well? I would expect detents in it to avoid accidentally engaging the half-nuts and the longitudinal feed at the same time -- just from vibration of the lathe as it cuts. And I would expect it to have a center position in which it does not engage either the power cross feed or the power longitudinal feed. When the power longitudinal feed is enaged (and the leadscrew is turning) it should turn the handwheel "1" to move the carriage slowly along the bed. This may be engaged, and may be what you are fighting. carriage. Everything else is most likely longitudinal and cross feed. And as long as you don't have the half-nuts engaged, you can play with the others with no problems (as long as you stop them before the carriage reaches the chuck or the tailstock. :-) last night i tried engaging the lead screw and moving the carriage left to right under power, which was fun. moved surprisingly slowly. then i changed the direction of the leadscrew (with teh handle on the headstock) and it seemed like the motion was rough, maybe as if something was being FORCED, didn't like that and so stopped doing it. seemed as if the gears in the headstock, when they were configured to move the opposite way, didn't like it at all. Hmm ... a problem in the tumbler gears (which are what do the reversing). It looks as though those are hidden under a plate to which your other threading gears mount, based on the photo with the flash stopping the spokes of the big pulley. You'll need to pull that apart and see what is happening in there. The typical design is that when the reversing lever is in the forward position, a single gear picks up the rotation of the spindle. When it is in the reverse position, a second gear is moved between the first and the spindle gear, effecting the reverse motion. It *may* be that this gear is stripped, or that things simply need better lubrication. Or -- it might be that something in the apron and carriage are fighting motion in the reverse direction. And -- it might be that your cross/longitudinal selector "3" is bouncing out of mesh. For smooth power feed motion you need: 1) the half nuts disengaged (tie that lever up to be safe, until you can install a detent of some sort. 2) The cross/longitudinal selector "3" in position and prevented from accidentally disengaging. (You mentioned a nut to lock it?). 3) The clutch screwed in to pick off motion from the leadscrew (it probably has a long keyway cut through the threads the whole length -- this rotates a worm gear in the apron, and the clutch couples this rotation to whichever power feed you have selected by "3". For *threading*, you need: 1) The cross/longitudinal selector "3" locked into a neutral position. 2) The clutch "2" disengaged, so it is not rotating anything inside the apron. 3) The half nuts selector lever pushed down to engage the half nuts during a threading pass, and lifted up to disengage it. It *should* stay in *whichever* position you put it in. In particular, you don't want it to drop back into engaged position when you are cranking the cross feed out to prepare for another pass. If this does not stay, you have serious problems, and this should be fixed in some way. It will tell you how South Bend lathes do this. They are somewhat different from my Clausing, and yet again different from a Sheldon ... thanks. But -- it will at least tell you what kind of behavior to expect. Interesting. Disengage the feed to the leadscrew (the reversing lever on the headstock should have a neutral position), and then you can i've had the lever in the neutral position, afraid to engage the lead screw drive. play with the controls without damaging anything -- but also without it doing anything useful. chuckle (i went to art school, this project has been for me at least partially a creative expression/outlet, hope though this lathe won't end up being entirely a kinetic sculpture.) :-) The handwheel? This may imply that you have a longitudinal feed i wouldn't have thought it would be called a handwheel. what in the heck is it called now, the word excapes me now, not a lever, not a knob, "handle", what's it called? do they refer to this thing as a handwheel even though there's no "wheel" component to it? "crank"? It is where the handwheel *should* be in a later machine, and serves the function of a handwheel. It is just too early a machine to have an actual wheel. :-) Your South Bend manual will show you real handwheels. :-) lever engaged with the clutch set to allow you to override it by enough oh! is the longitudinal feel lever the thing on the headstock that makes the lead screw rotate?! No -- that is the reverse tumbler lever. There is no longitudinal feed *lever*. The longitudinal feed function is selected by a combination of the selector "3" and the clutch "4". You really need to talk to the other person on here who has a Star, and ask him just how those are expected to behave on your machine. If I were there, I would be experimenting and finding out what it is doing, what it *should* be doing and is not, and how to make it do what it should do. hand force. Are you sure? This may be why you are having strange behavior. it seemed as if there were enough of a tooth remaining on each of the broken teeth to uninterruptedly engage the mating gear. You mean that the teeth were not broken all the way across? It is possible to build up where broken teeth were with screws and brazing compound, and then to file them into the shape of gear teeth again -- with very careful work and test fitting against a mating gear. Good Luck, DoN. in my photo... http://www.frontiernet.net/~wwixon/handles.jpg "1" moves the carriage from left to right/right to left. (is very stiff and jerky. i think the pinion gear might need to be shimmed or something, i think maybe it's too tightly crammed up into the "rack" gear under the bed/ways. is that what they're called, "rack and pinion"?) The rack gear, with a worn carriage on a worn bed which are re-scraped to a good fit will wind up with the pinion too *low* and at that time a shim mounted between the rack gear and the lathe bed is used to move it down far enough to engage. This kind of work also probably requires moving the leadscrew down a little to keep it lined up with the half nuts and the worm gear in the apron. My first thought is that you are fighting the longitudinal feed function (selected by "3"). Can you lock that lever in an in-between position, where it engages neither the longitudinal feed nor the cross-feed? (This is where we need someone who knows how *your* lathe is supposed to behave. "2" seems to be a clutch that makes "6" turn but i think it also makes "1" turn too, It should, depending on the position of "3". not sure what "2" does. screw it in, tightens up and engages something inside, turn it the opposite way and loosens, disengages whatever it was it engaged. "2" is the clutch. All the way out (loosened) should make it fairly easy to crank the carriage from end to end -- unless you have a lock clamp engaged on the carriage. "3" flops up and down from position "a." to position "b.", tighten the knob to make it stay at either position. (i'm very confused as to what this handle does.) The "knob" is under the lever in 3? In any case, this *should* -- at least on a normal lathe -- select the power feed (through the clutch "2") to go to the cross-feed (crank "6"), or to the handwheel (crank "1"). And it *should* have a middle position where it will drive neither of those -- even with the clutch engaged. Can the knob under lever "3" be set just stiff enough so you can move the lever "3" from cross-feed to longitudinal-feed positions, or leave it in the middle and drive nothing? "4" engages/disengages the, i assume, "half nut". It is in the right place to do so, so that is pretty likely. The problem here is your missing detent, so it can drop into engaged position without your agreement. Later lathes have an interlock which keeps you from engaging both the half nuts and the longitudinal feed at the same time. According to Jim, his does not have that. I keep wondering whether it was simply a part which wore out or got left out when the apron was apart some time.. "5" what do you guys call that one? transverse feed? The "compound" crank. "6" moves the tool holder toward or away from the operator. this handle will rotate under power of the lathe. The "crossfeed" crank. I wish that I were in a position to take a look at this in person. There is an awful lot which would be quicker with my hands on the machine to check out what is happening -- especially since it is a m machine which I have never handled -- working or not. Good Luck DoN. -- Email: | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564 (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero --- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Star lathe motor mounting | Metalworking | |||
Funny lathe mach'g update... | Metalworking | |||
Update on plum bowl, was "too big for lathe?" (0/1) | Woodturning | |||
Update: lathe chuck info | Woodturning | |||
I'm done turning for a while | Woodturning |