We'll have answers soon...

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...-cover-up.aspx

On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 7:02:34 AM UTC-4, Larry wrote:
We'll have answers soon...

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...-cover-up.aspx

Ah, another link to an article on the self-serving website of the notorious
quack Joseph Mercola. If only he had any credentials at all in epidemiology
or virology. Or any credentials at all. Sure, he's a D.O. Just like 150,000 or
so other osteopaths in the U.S.

Cindy Hamilton

On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 7:41:57 AM UTC-4, wrote:
On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 7:02:34 AM UTC-4, Larry wrote:
We'll have answers soon...

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...-cover-up.aspx
Ah, another link to an article on the self-serving website of the notorious
quack Joseph Mercola. If only he had any credentials at all in epidemiology
or virology. Or any credentials at all. Sure, he's a D.O. Just like 150,000 or
so other osteopaths in the U.S.

Cindy Hamilton

I was going to say maybe someone should investigate Mercola, but then I figured why
give this more attention.

On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 04:33:00 -0700 (PDT), trader_4
wrote:

On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 7:41:57 AM UTC-4, wrote:
On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 7:02:34 AM UTC-4, Larry wrote:
We'll have answers soon...

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...-cover-up.aspx
Ah, another link to an article on the self-serving website of the notorious
quack Joseph Mercola. If only he had any credentials at all in epidemiology
or virology. Or any credentials at all. Sure, he's a D.O. Just like 150,000 or
so other osteopaths in the U.S.

Cindy Hamilton

I was going to say maybe someone should investigate Mercola, but then I figured why
give this more attention.

Maybe if there is any value to this whole mess, it should make us
pause before we believe everything a doctor says just because he has
been to medical school. There are lots of quacks and posers out there.
Just like bad plumbers and bad car mechanics, there are plenty of bad
doctors and plenty of conflicting opinions.
Most suspect are those flogging a book or trying to advance a
political agenda.

On 4/28/2021 10:50 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 04:33:00 -0700 (PDT), trader_4
wrote:

On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 7:41:57 AM UTC-4, wrote:
On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 7:02:34 AM UTC-4, Larry wrote:
We'll have answers soon...

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...-cover-up.aspx
Ah, another link to an article on the self-serving website of the notorious
quack Joseph Mercola. If only he had any credentials at all in epidemiology
or virology. Or any credentials at all. Sure, he's a D.O. Just like 150,000 or
so other osteopaths in the U.S.

Cindy Hamilton

I was going to say maybe someone should investigate Mercola, but then I figured why
give this more attention.

Maybe if there is any value to this whole mess, it should make us
pause before we believe everything a doctor says just because he has
been to medical school. There are lots of quacks and posers out there.
Just like bad plumbers and bad car mechanics, there are plenty of bad
doctors and plenty of conflicting opinions.
Most suspect are those flogging a book or trying to advance a
political agenda.



Mercola, see:

https://cspinet.org/news/fda-and-ftc...ovid-19-health

Not surprisingly, last year, when almost the entire Federal executive
and legislative branches of government were under the control of he who
shall not be named and his "party", the inquiry went nowhere.

wrote in message
...
On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 04:33:00 -0700 (PDT), trader_4
wrote:

On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 7:41:57 AM UTC-4,
wrote:
On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 7:02:34 AM UTC-4, Larry wrote:
We'll have answers soon...

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...-cover-up.aspx
Ah, another link to an article on the self-serving website of the
notorious
quack Joseph Mercola. If only he had any credentials at all in
epidemiology
or virology. Or any credentials at all. Sure, he's a D.O. Just like
150,000 or
so other osteopaths in the U.S.

Cindy Hamilton

I was going to say maybe someone should investigate Mercola, but then I
figured why
give this more attention.

Maybe if there is any value to this whole mess, it should make us
pause before we believe everything a doctor says just because he has
been to medical school. There are lots of quacks and posers out there.
Just like bad plumbers and bad car mechanics, there are plenty of bad
doctors and plenty of conflicting opinions.

Most suspect are those flogging a book or trying to advance a
political agenda.

Then there are fools like you who cant even manage to get the basics like
masks right.

On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 03:46:15 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:


Then there are fools like you who cant even manage to get the basics like
masks right.

And then there are fools like you who are so miserable they get up every
night between 1 and 4 am in Australia just so they have SOMEONE to talk to!
Right, you miserable forsaken sociopathic swine from Oz?

--
Richard addressing senile Rodent Speed:
"**** you're thick/pathetic excuse for a troll."
MID:

On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 10:50:41 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 04:33:00 -0700 (PDT), trader_4
wrote:

On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 7:41:57 AM UTC-4, wrote:
On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 7:02:34 AM UTC-4, Larry wrote:
We'll have answers soon...

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...-cover-up.aspx
Ah, another link to an article on the self-serving website of the notorious
quack Joseph Mercola. If only he had any credentials at all in epidemiology
or virology. Or any credentials at all. Sure, he's a D.O. Just like 150,000 or
so other osteopaths in the U.S.

Cindy Hamilton

I was going to say maybe someone should investigate Mercola, but then I figured why
give this more attention.

Maybe if there is any value to this whole mess, it should make us
pause before we believe everything a doctor says just because he has
been to medical school. There are lots of quacks and posers out there.

Most of us knew that already, since it's basic common sense. It's
interesting that the quacks were generally trotted out by the far right as
part of the Trump circus.

Moral for the Trump supporters: a doctor is not a doctor is not a doctor.
Not all doctors know the same things. Scott Atlas may be an idiot, but he
wasn't the only one.

Just like bad plumbers and bad car mechanics, there are plenty of bad
doctors and plenty of conflicting opinions.
Most suspect are those flogging a book or trying to advance a
political agenda.

Most suspect are those who are eager to speak outside of their area of
expertise, especially when they so clearly contradict actual experts.
It's easy to identify and ignore the quacks, but you have to want to.

On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 00:10:07 -0500, Jim Joyce posted for all of us to digest...

Moral for the Trump supporters: a doctor is not a doctor is not a doctor.


Like Dr. Biden ?

--
Tekkie

On Wednesday, April 28, 2021 at 10:51:05 AM UTC-4, wrote:
On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 04:33:00 -0700 (PDT), trader_4
wrote:

On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 7:41:57 AM UTC-4, wrote:
On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 7:02:34 AM UTC-4, Larry wrote:
We'll have answers soon...

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...-cover-up.aspx
Ah, another link to an article on the self-serving website of the notorious
quack Joseph Mercola. If only he had any credentials at all in epidemiology
or virology. Or any credentials at all. Sure, he's a D.O. Just like 150,000 or
so other osteopaths in the U.S.

Cindy Hamilton

I was going to say maybe someone should investigate Mercola, but then I figured why
give this more attention.
Maybe if there is any value to this whole mess, it should make us
pause before we believe everything a doctor says just because he has
been to medical school. There are lots of quacks and posers out there.
Just like bad plumbers and bad car mechanics, there are plenty of bad
doctors and plenty of conflicting opinions.
Most suspect are those flogging a book or trying to advance a
political agenda.

Funny we didn't see you saying that when Trump had a loon radiologist formulating
Covid policy.

On Sat, 1 May 2021 07:21:10 -0700 (PDT), trader_4
wrote:

On Wednesday, April 28, 2021 at 10:51:05 AM UTC-4, wrote:
On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 04:33:00 -0700 (PDT), trader_4
wrote:

On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 7:41:57 AM UTC-4, wrote:
On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 7:02:34 AM UTC-4, Larry wrote:
We'll have answers soon...

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...-cover-up.aspx
Ah, another link to an article on the self-serving website of the notorious
quack Joseph Mercola. If only he had any credentials at all in epidemiology
or virology. Or any credentials at all. Sure, he's a D.O. Just like 150,000 or
so other osteopaths in the U.S.

Cindy Hamilton

I was going to say maybe someone should investigate Mercola, but then I figured why
give this more attention.
Maybe if there is any value to this whole mess, it should make us
pause before we believe everything a doctor says just because he has
been to medical school. There are lots of quacks and posers out there.
Just like bad plumbers and bad car mechanics, there are plenty of bad
doctors and plenty of conflicting opinions.
Most suspect are those flogging a book or trying to advance a
political agenda.

Funny we didn't see you saying that when Trump had a loon radiologist formulating
Covid policy.

You didn't see me saying anything at all about it except the
government message is a garbled bunch of guesses. I certainly never
believed much of what they said and if you waited a week the story
changed.

On 4/27/2021 7:02 AM, Larry wrote:

We'll have answers soon...

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...-cover-up.aspx


Looks like he is selling books, not truth. Can't read the article
unless I give an email address so he can send me junk.

On 4/27/2021 4:02 AM, Larry wrote:

We'll have answers soon...

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...-cover-up.aspx



"FDA cites Mercola for alleged COVID-19 treatment claims"

https://cspinet.org/sites/default/fi..._7-20-2020.pdf

On 4/27/21 11:30 PM, Bob F wrote:
On 4/27/2021 4:02 AM, Larry wrote:

We'll have answers soon...

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...-cover-up.aspx


"FDA cites Mercola for alleged COVID-19 treatment claims"

https://cspinet.org/sites/default/fi..._7-20-2020.pdf


I trust the FDA about as much as I trust CNN/ABC/*NBC/CBS etc.

On 4/28/2021 7:19 AM, Larry wrote:
On 4/27/21 11:30 PM, Bob F wrote:
On 4/27/2021 4:02 AM, Larry wrote:

We'll have answers soon...

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...-cover-up.aspx



"FDA cites Mercola for alleged COVID-19 treatment claims"

https://cspinet.org/sites/default/fi..._7-20-2020.pdf


I trust the FDA about as much as I trust CNN/ABC/*NBC/CBS etc.

Do you trust Fox? NY Post? They had to retract the lies they told
about Kamala's book.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...la-harris-book

On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 08:47:50 -0400, Ed Pawlowski wrote:

On 4/28/2021 7:19 AM, Larry wrote:
On 4/27/21 11:30 PM, Bob F wrote:
On 4/27/2021 4:02 AM, Larry wrote:

We'll have answers soon...

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...-cover-up.aspx



"FDA cites Mercola for alleged COVID-19 treatment claims"

https://cspinet.org/sites/default/fi..._7-20-2020.pdf


I trust the FDA about as much as I trust CNN/ABC/*NBC/CBS etc.

Do you trust Fox? NY Post? They had to retract the lies they told
about Kamala's book.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...la-harris-book

Fox also retracted their lies about Biden taking away red meat. That's the
good news. The bad news is that some of the other right wings 'news'
outlets just let their lies stand, without retraction.

On 4/28/2021 4:19 AM, Larry wrote:
On 4/27/21 11:30 PM, Bob F wrote:
On 4/27/2021 4:02 AM, Larry wrote:

We'll have answers soon...

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...-cover-up.aspx



"FDA cites Mercola for alleged COVID-19 treatment claims"

https://cspinet.org/sites/default/fi..._7-20-2020.pdf


I trust the FDA about as much as I trust CNN/ABC/*NBC/CBS etc.

Yes, you are THAT STUPID!

On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 07:02:24 -0400, Larry wrote:


We'll have answers soon...

big_pharma_dick_sucking_worthless_piece_of_sht_a rticle_snipped

And here they a

https://eand.co/the-real-reason-the-...d-90307523f50c

Complete with references, they are less radical than the
actual article(anyone with an IQ over 100 please read the references.
Less fortunate souls can shout "Trump Won!")
So when P2 and P3 hits the US, and Pfizer charges US$100 for
the booster, maybe US$200 the year after, you know why.
And who was responsible for the genocide.
[]'s

--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012

On 5/2/21 2:25 PM, Shadow wrote:
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 07:02:24 -0400, Larry wrote:


We'll have answers soon...

big_pharma_dick_sucking_worthless_piece_of_sht_ar ticle_snipped



https://www.americasfrontlinedoctors...r-gene-therapy

By referring to COVID-19 vaccines as "vaccines" rather than gene therapies, the U.S. government is violating its 15 U.S. Code Section 41,
which regulates deceptive practices in medical claims

The mRNA injections are gene therapies that do not fulfill a single criteria or definition of a vaccine

COVID-19 "vaccines" do not impart immunity or inhibit transmissibility of the disease. They only are designed to lessen your infection
symptoms if or when you get infected. As such, these products do not meet the legal or medical definition of a vaccine

Since a vast majority of people who test positive for SARS-CoV-2 have no symptoms at all, they've not even been able to establish a causal
link between the virus and the clinical disease

By calling this experimental gene therapy technology a "vaccine," they are circumventing liability for damages that would otherwise apply.

On Sun, 2 May 2021 16:29:24 -0400, Larry wrote:

On 5/2/21 2:25 PM, Shadow wrote:
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 07:02:24 -0400, Larry wrote:


We'll have answers soon...

big_pharma_dick_sucking_worthless_piece_of_sht_ar ticle_snipped



https://www.americasfrontlinedoctors...r-gene-therapy

By referring to COVID-19 vaccines as "vaccines" rather than gene therapies, the U.S. government is violating its 15 U.S. Code Section 41,
which regulates deceptive practices in medical claims

The mRNA injections are gene therapies that do not fulfill a single criteria or definition of a vaccine

COVID-19 "vaccines" do not impart immunity or inhibit transmissibility of the disease. They only are designed to lessen your infection
symptoms if or when you get infected. As such, these products do not meet the legal or medical definition of a vaccine

Since a vast majority of people who test positive for SARS-CoV-2 have no symptoms at all, they've not even been able to establish a causal
link between the virus and the clinical disease

By calling this experimental gene therapy technology a "vaccine," they are circumventing liability for damages that would otherwise apply.
Bull****

On Sun, 02 May 2021 20:37:15 -0400, Clare Snyder
wrote:

On Sun, 2 May 2021 16:29:24 -0400, Larry wrote:

On 5/2/21 2:25 PM, Shadow wrote:
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 07:02:24 -0400, Larry wrote:


We'll have answers soon...

big_pharma_dick_sucking_worthless_piece_of_sht_ar ticle_snipped



https://www.americasfrontlinedoctors...r-gene-therapy

By referring to COVID-19 vaccines as "vaccines" rather than gene therapies, the U.S. government is violating its 15 U.S. Code Section 41,
which regulates deceptive practices in medical claims

The mRNA injections are gene therapies that do not fulfill a single criteria or definition of a vaccine

COVID-19 "vaccines" do not impart immunity or inhibit transmissibility of the disease. They only are designed to lessen your infection
symptoms if or when you get infected. As such, these products do not meet the legal or medical definition of a vaccine

Since a vast majority of people who test positive for SARS-CoV-2 have no symptoms at all, they've not even been able to establish a causal
link between the virus and the clinical disease

By calling this experimental gene therapy technology a "vaccine," they are circumventing liability for damages that would otherwise apply.
Bull****

Obviously, which is why he deleted the contents of my original
post.
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012

On Sun, 2 May 2021 16:29:24 -0400, Larry wrote:

On 5/2/21 2:25 PM, Shadow wrote:
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 07:02:24 -0400, Larry wrote:


We'll have answers soon...

big_pharma_dick_sucking_worthless_piece_of_sht_ar ticle_snipped

https://eand.co/the-real-reason-the-...d-90307523f50c

slight snip of garbage

By calling this experimental gene therapy technology a "vaccine,"
they are circumventing liability for damages that would otherwise....

..... fail to recognize that "TRUMP WON!!!"

Free speech is supposed to be a GOOD thing

I'm relieved you didn't read the references in the article I
posted(and re-instated above). You wouldn't have understood them.
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012

On 5/2/2021 1:29 PM, Larry wrote:
On 5/2/21 2:25 PM, Shadow wrote:
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 07:02:24 -0400, Larry wrote:


We'll have answers soon...

big_pharma_dick_sucking_worthless_piece_of_sht_ar ticle_snipped



https://www.americasfrontlinedoctors...r-gene-therapy


Â*Â* By referring to COVID-19 vaccines as "vaccines" rather than gene
therapies, the U.S. government is violating its 15 U.S. Code Section 41,
which regulates deceptive practices in medical claims

Â*Â* The mRNA injections are gene therapies that do not fulfill a single
criteria or definition of a vaccine

Â*Â* COVID-19 "vaccines" do not impart immunity or inhibit
transmissibility of the disease. They only are designed to lessen your
infection symptoms if or when you get infected. As such, these products
do not meet the legal or medical definition of a vaccine

Â*Â* Since a vast majority of people who test positive for SARS-CoV-2
have no symptoms at all, they've not even been able to establish a
causal link between the virus and the clinical disease

Â*Â* By calling this experimental gene therapy technology a "vaccine,"
they are circumventing liability for damages that would otherwise apply.

You are full of **** up to your ears.