On 2/5/2021 3:32 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
On 2/5/2021 1:38 PM, Muggles wrote:
On 2/5/2021 12:10 PM, Heywood wrote:

This is just one company
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-54873105

Their vaccine has been tested on 43,500 people in six countries and
no safety concerns have been raised.


Thats 43K+ guinea pigs.


True, but it proved they work with minimal side effects. What else do
you want them to do?


Not use the general public as guinea pigs would be great.

--
Maggie

On 2/5/2021 3:53 PM, Rod Speed wrote:


"Muggles" wrote in message
...
On 2/4/2021 6:37 PM, Rod Speed wrote:


"Muggles" wrote in message
...
On 2/4/2021 12:20 PM, Bod wrote:
On 04/02/2021 17:58, Muggles wrote:
On 2/3/2021 11:23 AM, Retirednoguilt wrote:

Recent epidemiologic data shows that the group most responsible
for spread of the infection is the 20-49 year old cohort.* They
probably feel that they are much less likely to experience
serious or fatal outcomes than those older (true), but fail to
appreciate that they are the group most likely to give a serious
or fatal case to their older friends, co-workers, and relatives.


There's no way to stop or prevent anyone from catching a virus.


Quite frankly, Muggles, you say ridiculous things.


Who have you prevented from catching a virus?


My kids, because they were vaccinated, stupid.


How do you know the vaccine has no side effects that will endanger them?


Because billions have been vaccinated and there have been no side
effects that have endangered anyone with the vaccinations they got.


How long did it take the medical establishment to realize that some
medications actually caused harm? Side effects don't always kill people
up front.

--
Maggie

On 2/5/2021 4:24 PM, Muggles wrote:
On 2/5/2021 3:53 PM, Rod Speed wrote:


"Muggles" wrote in message
...
On 2/4/2021 6:37 PM, Rod Speed wrote:


"Muggles" wrote in message
...
On 2/4/2021 12:20 PM, Bod wrote:
On 04/02/2021 17:58, Muggles wrote:
On 2/3/2021 11:23 AM, Retirednoguilt wrote:

Recent epidemiologic data shows that the group most responsible
for spread of the infection is the 20-49 year old cohort.* They
probably feel that they are much less likely to experience
serious or fatal outcomes than those older (true), but fail to
appreciate that they are the group most likely to give a serious
or fatal case to their older friends, co-workers, and relatives.


There's no way to stop or prevent anyone from catching a virus.


Quite frankly, Muggles, you say ridiculous things.


Who have you prevented from catching a virus?


My kids, because they were vaccinated, stupid.


How do you know the vaccine has no side effects that will endanger them?


Because billions have been vaccinated and there have been no side
effects that have endangered anyone with the vaccinations they got.


How long did it take the medical establishment to realize that some
medications actually caused harm?* Side effects don't always kill people
up front.


Vaccinations save WAY more problems than they cause. They same millions
of deaths and serious illnesses, and save enormous hospital costs also.

In alt.home.repair, on Fri, 5 Feb 2021 16:32:19 -0500, Ed Pawlowski
wrote:

On 2/5/2021 1:38 PM, Muggles wrote:
On 2/5/2021 12:10 PM, Heywood wrote:
On 2/5/2021 12:39 PM, Muggles wrote:
On 2/4/2021 6:38 PM, Rod Speed wrote:


"Muggles" wrote in message
...
On 2/4/2021 12:34 PM, Rod Speed wrote:


"Muggles" wrote in message
...
On 2/3/2021 11:23 AM, Retirednoguilt wrote:

Recent epidemiologic data shows that the group most responsible
for spread of the infection is the 20-49 year old cohort.* They
probably feel that they are much less likely to experience
serious or fatal outcomes than those older (true), but fail to
appreciate that they are the group most likely to give a serious
or fatal case to their older friends, co-workers, and relatives.

There's no way to stop or prevent anyone from catching a virus.

Must be why we didn’t stamp out smallpox, polio and
drastically controlled influenza, measles, mumps etc etc etc.

So, provide the evidence that one person prevented another person
from catching a virus?


All those parents who had enough of a clue to vaccinate
their kids so they didn’t get smallpox, polio, influenza,
measles, mumps etc etc etc.



Those vaccines were TESTED and thoroughly vetted, which includes
learning the major side effects, too.

Try again.** These vaccines have NOT been thoroughly tested.


I'd think 43,000 people is a pretty good test.* Its not like they got
a free pass after 10 people.

If it's a 'pretty good test' to give an unvetted vaccine with unknown
side effects to the general population, then why aren't other vaccines
produced with testing done on the general population?


This is just one company
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-54873105

Their vaccine has been tested on 43,500 people in six countries and no
safety concerns have been raised.

Thats 43K+ guinea pigs.


True, but it proved they work with minimal side effects. What else do
you want them to do?

I thought she was waiting until it was tested before she used it.

Now she's insulting those who do.

BTW, though there was some modest risk to being a phase 3 trial, they
were all vaccinated before anybody else. That's the payoff if you're
not in the control group.

And in this case, wasnt' the contol all of the rest of society? Or did
I miss something?

On 2/5/2021 5:05 PM, micky wrote:
In alt.home.repair, on Fri, 5 Feb 2021 16:32:19 -0500, Ed Pawlowski
wrote:

On 2/5/2021 1:38 PM, Muggles wrote:
On 2/5/2021 12:10 PM, Heywood wrote:
On 2/5/2021 12:39 PM, Muggles wrote:
On 2/4/2021 6:38 PM, Rod Speed wrote:


"Muggles" wrote in message
...
On 2/4/2021 12:34 PM, Rod Speed wrote:


"Muggles" wrote in message
...
On 2/3/2021 11:23 AM, Retirednoguilt wrote:

Recent epidemiologic data shows that the group most responsible
for spread of the infection is the 20-49 year old cohort.Â* They
probably feel that they are much less likely to experience
serious or fatal outcomes than those older (true), but fail to
appreciate that they are the group most likely to give a serious
or fatal case to their older friends, co-workers, and relatives.

There's no way to stop or prevent anyone from catching a virus.

Must be why we didnt stamp out smallpox, polio and
drastically controlled influenza, measles, mumps etc etc etc.

So, provide the evidence that one person prevented another person
from catching a virus?


All those parents who had enough of a clue to vaccinate
their kids so they didnt get smallpox, polio, influenza,
measles, mumps etc etc etc.



Those vaccines were TESTED and thoroughly vetted, which includes
learning the major side effects, too.

Try again.Â*Â* These vaccines have NOT been thoroughly tested.


I'd think 43,000 people is a pretty good test.Â* Its not like they got
a free pass after 10 people.

If it's a 'pretty good test' to give an unvetted vaccine with unknown
side effects to the general population, then why aren't other vaccines
produced with testing done on the general population?


This is just one company
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-54873105

Their vaccine has been tested on 43,500 people in six countries and no
safety concerns have been raised.

Thats 43K+ guinea pigs.


True, but it proved they work with minimal side effects. What else do
you want them to do?

I thought she was waiting until it was tested before she used it.

Now she's insulting those who do.

BTW, though there was some modest risk to being a phase 3 trial, they
were all vaccinated before anybody else. That's the payoff if you're
not in the control group.

J & J had problem with some of the people in their trials dropping out
to get the first vaccines that were approved. I guess thay didn't want
to take the risk of being a control.


And in this case, wasnt' the contol all of the rest of society? Or did
I miss something?


No. the controls have to be processed the same as the test subjects, and
not know which they were.

On 2/5/2021 7:05 PM, micky wrote:
In alt.home.repair, on Fri, 5 Feb 2021 16:32:19 -0500, Ed Pawlowski
wrote:

On 2/5/2021 1:38 PM, Muggles wrote:
On 2/5/2021 12:10 PM, Heywood wrote:
On 2/5/2021 12:39 PM, Muggles wrote:
On 2/4/2021 6:38 PM, Rod Speed wrote:


"Muggles" wrote in message
...
On 2/4/2021 12:34 PM, Rod Speed wrote:


"Muggles" wrote in message
...
On 2/3/2021 11:23 AM, Retirednoguilt wrote:

Recent epidemiologic data shows that the group most responsible
for spread of the infection is the 20-49 year old cohort.Â* They
probably feel that they are much less likely to experience
serious or fatal outcomes than those older (true), but fail to
appreciate that they are the group most likely to give a serious
or fatal case to their older friends, co-workers, and relatives.

There's no way to stop or prevent anyone from catching a virus.

Must be why we didnt stamp out smallpox, polio and
drastically controlled influenza, measles, mumps etc etc etc.

So, provide the evidence that one person prevented another person
from catching a virus?


All those parents who had enough of a clue to vaccinate
their kids so they didnt get smallpox, polio, influenza,
measles, mumps etc etc etc.



Those vaccines were TESTED and thoroughly vetted, which includes
learning the major side effects, too.

Try again.Â*Â* These vaccines have NOT been thoroughly tested.


I'd think 43,000 people is a pretty good test.Â* Its not like they got
a free pass after 10 people.

If it's a 'pretty good test' to give an unvetted vaccine with unknown
side effects to the general population, then why aren't other vaccines
produced with testing done on the general population?


This is just one company
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-54873105

Their vaccine has been tested on 43,500 people in six countries and no
safety concerns have been raised.

Thats 43K+ guinea pigs.


True, but it proved they work with minimal side effects. What else do
you want them to do?


I thought she was waiting until it was tested before she used it.

Now she's insulting those who do.

Why do you (or anyone else) care what I say about anything? It seems I
live in your heads rent free.


--
Maggie

On 02/05/2021 11:10 AM, Heywood wrote:
On 2/5/2021 12:39 PM, Muggles wrote:
On 2/4/2021 6:38 PM, Rod Speed wrote:


"Muggles" wrote in message
...
On 2/4/2021 12:34 PM, Rod Speed wrote:


"Muggles" wrote in message
...
On 2/3/2021 11:23 AM, Retirednoguilt wrote:

Recent epidemiologic data shows that the group most responsible
for spread of the infection is the 20-49 year old cohort. They
probably feel that they are much less likely to experience
serious or fatal outcomes than those older (true), but fail to
appreciate that they are the group most likely to give a serious
or fatal case to their older friends, co-workers, and relatives.

There's no way to stop or prevent anyone from catching a virus.

Must be why we didn’t stamp out smallpox, polio and
drastically controlled influenza, measles, mumps etc etc etc.

So, provide the evidence that one person prevented another person
from catching a virus?


All those parents who had enough of a clue to vaccinate
their kids so they didn’t get smallpox, polio, influenza,
measles, mumps etc etc etc.



Those vaccines were TESTED and thoroughly vetted, which includes
learning the major side effects, too.

Try again. These vaccines have NOT been thoroughly tested.

I'd think 43,000 people is a pretty good test. Its not like they got a
free pass after 10 people.

https://www.history.com/news/swine-f...tion-year-1976

45 million people were vaccinated before the government decided the
risks outweighed the benefits and pulled the plug. My ex had a mild case
of Guillain-Barré. I don't think she's planning on jumping into this one
feet first although she is a high risk.

On 2/5/2021 7:22 PM, Muggles wrote:
On 2/5/2021 3:32 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
On 2/5/2021 1:38 PM, Muggles wrote:
On 2/5/2021 12:10 PM, Heywood wrote:

This is just one company
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-54873105

Their vaccine has been tested on 43,500 people in six countries and
no safety concerns have been raised.


Thats 43K+ guinea pigs.


True, but it proved they work with minimal side effects. What else do
you want them to do?


Not use the general public as guinea pigs would be great.


They were volunteers for the testing, same as is done for all vaccines
and drugs. What would you have used that would be as accurate?

"Muggles" wrote in message ...
On 2/5/2021 12:45 PM, Bod wrote:
On 05/02/2021 18:40, Muggles wrote:
On 2/5/2021 12:40 PM, Bod wrote:

Their vaccine has been tested on 43,500 people in six countries and
no safety concerns have been raised.

Thats 43K+ guinea pigs.

Correct "and NO safety concerns have been raised"

HAHAHA! Thousands of people have safety concerns!


There's no reasoning with you.

You think reasoning means I suddenly agree with you.

Nope, that no evidence gets thru your thick skull.

You are so stupid that you cant even work out that
what is seen with a single individual proves nothing
about how effective a specific treatment is when lots
of people who were as sick as he was recover just as
quickly from this virus as he did without that treatment.

Silly man.

Stupid arsehole cow.

"Muggles" wrote in message ...
On 2/5/2021 3:32 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
On 2/5/2021 1:38 PM, Muggles wrote:
On 2/5/2021 12:10 PM, Heywood wrote:

This is just one company
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-54873105

Their vaccine has been tested on 43,500 people in six countries and no
safety concerns have been raised.


Thats 43K+ guinea pigs.


True, but it proved they work with minimal side effects. What else do you
want them to do?

Not use the general public as guinea pigs

They didn’t, those 43K+ guinea pigs were all VOLUNTEERS.

would be great.

"Muggles" wrote in message ...
On 2/5/2021 3:53 PM, Rod Speed wrote:


"Muggles" wrote in message
...
On 2/4/2021 6:37 PM, Rod Speed wrote:


"Muggles" wrote in message
...
On 2/4/2021 12:20 PM, Bod wrote:
On 04/02/2021 17:58, Muggles wrote:
On 2/3/2021 11:23 AM, Retirednoguilt wrote:

Recent epidemiologic data shows that the group most responsible for
spread of the infection is the 20-49 year old cohort. They
probably feel that they are much less likely to experience serious
or fatal outcomes than those older (true), but fail to appreciate
that they are the group most likely to give a serious or fatal case
to their older friends, co-workers, and relatives.


There's no way to stop or prevent anyone from catching a virus.


Quite frankly, Muggles, you say ridiculous things.


Who have you prevented from catching a virus?


My kids, because they were vaccinated, stupid.


How do you know the vaccine has no side effects that will endanger them?


Because billions have been vaccinated and there have been no side
effects that have endangered anyone with the vaccinations they got.

How long did it take the medical establishment to realize that some
medications actually caused harm?

We arent discussing medications, we are discussing VACCINATIONS.

Side effects don't always kill people up front.

In fact there are far fewer non fatal important
side effects with vaccinations than there are if
you catch the disease, ****wit.

"micky" wrote in message
...
In alt.home.repair, on Fri, 5 Feb 2021 16:32:19 -0500, Ed Pawlowski
wrote:

On 2/5/2021 1:38 PM, Muggles wrote:
On 2/5/2021 12:10 PM, Heywood wrote:
On 2/5/2021 12:39 PM, Muggles wrote:
On 2/4/2021 6:38 PM, Rod Speed wrote:


"Muggles" wrote in message
...
On 2/4/2021 12:34 PM, Rod Speed wrote:


"Muggles" wrote in message
...
On 2/3/2021 11:23 AM, Retirednoguilt wrote:

Recent epidemiologic data shows that the group most responsible
for spread of the infection is the 20-49 year old cohort. They
probably feel that they are much less likely to experience
serious or fatal outcomes than those older (true), but fail to
appreciate that they are the group most likely to give a serious
or fatal case to their older friends, co-workers, and relatives.

There's no way to stop or prevent anyone from catching a virus.

Must be why we didn't stamp out smallpox, polio and
drastically controlled influenza, measles, mumps etc etc etc.

So, provide the evidence that one person prevented another person
from catching a virus?


All those parents who had enough of a clue to vaccinate
their kids so they didn't get smallpox, polio, influenza,
measles, mumps etc etc etc.



Those vaccines were TESTED and thoroughly vetted, which includes
learning the major side effects, too.

Try again. These vaccines have NOT been thoroughly tested.


I'd think 43,000 people is a pretty good test. Its not like they got
a free pass after 10 people.

If it's a 'pretty good test' to give an unvetted vaccine with unknown
side effects to the general population, then why aren't other vaccines
produced with testing done on the general population?


This is just one company
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-54873105

Their vaccine has been tested on 43,500 people in six countries and no
safety concerns have been raised.

Thats 43K+ guinea pigs.


True, but it proved they work with minimal side effects. What else do
you want them to do?

I thought she was waiting until it was tested before she used it.

Now she's insulting those who do.

BTW, though there was some modest risk to being a phase 3 trial, they
were all vaccinated before anybody else. That's the payoff if you're
not in the control group.

And in this case, wasnt' the contol all of the rest of society?

Nope because the control group is matched to the
group that gets the vaccine with the group they are
in randomly selected.

Or did I miss something?

Yep.

"Muggles" wrote in message ...
On 2/5/2021 7:05 PM, micky wrote:
In alt.home.repair, on Fri, 5 Feb 2021 16:32:19 -0500, Ed Pawlowski
wrote:

On 2/5/2021 1:38 PM, Muggles wrote:
On 2/5/2021 12:10 PM, Heywood wrote:
On 2/5/2021 12:39 PM, Muggles wrote:
On 2/4/2021 6:38 PM, Rod Speed wrote:


"Muggles" wrote in message
...
On 2/4/2021 12:34 PM, Rod Speed wrote:


"Muggles" wrote in message
...
On 2/3/2021 11:23 AM, Retirednoguilt wrote:

Recent epidemiologic data shows that the group most responsible
for spread of the infection is the 20-49 year old cohort. They
probably feel that they are much less likely to experience
serious or fatal outcomes than those older (true), but fail to
appreciate that they are the group most likely to give a serious
or fatal case to their older friends, co-workers, and relatives.

There's no way to stop or prevent anyone from catching a virus.

Must be why we didnt stamp out smallpox, polio and
drastically controlled influenza, measles, mumps etc etc etc.

So, provide the evidence that one person prevented another person
from catching a virus?


All those parents who had enough of a clue to vaccinate
their kids so they didnt get smallpox, polio, influenza,
measles, mumps etc etc etc.



Those vaccines were TESTED and thoroughly vetted, which includes
learning the major side effects, too.

Try again. These vaccines have NOT been thoroughly tested.


I'd think 43,000 people is a pretty good test. Its not like they got
a free pass after 10 people.

If it's a 'pretty good test' to give an unvetted vaccine with unknown
side effects to the general population, then why aren't other vaccines
produced with testing done on the general population?


This is just one company
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-54873105

Their vaccine has been tested on 43,500 people in six countries and no
safety concerns have been raised.

Thats 43K+ guinea pigs.


True, but it proved they work with minimal side effects. What else do
you want them to do?


I thought she was waiting until it was tested before she used it.

Now she's insulting those who do.

Why do you (or anyone else) care what I say about anything?

Because some who are not well informed
may believe the **** you spew.

It seems I live in your heads rent free.

The you need new seems machinery, BAD.

On 2/5/2021 5:45 PM, Muggles wrote:
On 2/5/2021 7:05 PM, micky wrote:
In alt.home.repair, on Fri, 5 Feb 2021 16:32:19 -0500, Ed Pawlowski
wrote:

On 2/5/2021 1:38 PM, Muggles wrote:
On 2/5/2021 12:10 PM, Heywood wrote:
On 2/5/2021 12:39 PM, Muggles wrote:
On 2/4/2021 6:38 PM, Rod Speed wrote:


"Muggles" wrote in message
...
On 2/4/2021 12:34 PM, Rod Speed wrote:


"Muggles" wrote in message
...
On 2/3/2021 11:23 AM, Retirednoguilt wrote:

Recent epidemiologic data shows that the group most responsible
for spread of the infection is the 20-49 year old cohort.Â* They
probably feel that they are much less likely to experience
serious or fatal outcomes than those older (true), but fail to
appreciate that they are the group most likely to give a serious
or fatal case to their older friends, co-workers, and relatives.

There's no way to stop or prevent anyone from catching a virus.

Must be why we didnt stamp out smallpox, polio and
drastically controlled influenza, measles, mumps etc etc etc.

So, provide the evidence that one person prevented another person
from catching a virus?


All those parents who had enough of a clue to vaccinate
their kids so they didnt get smallpox, polio, influenza,
measles, mumps etc etc etc.



Those vaccines were TESTED and thoroughly vetted, which includes
learning the major side effects, too.

Try again.Â*Â* These vaccines have NOT been thoroughly tested.


I'd think 43,000 people is a pretty good test.Â* Its not like they got
a free pass after 10 people.

If it's a 'pretty good test' to give an unvetted vaccine with unknown
side effects to the general population, then why aren't other vaccines
produced with testing done on the general population?


This is just one company
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-54873105

Their vaccine has been tested on 43,500 people in six countries and no
safety concerns have been raised.

Thats 43K+ guinea pigs.


True, but it proved they work with minimal side effects. What else do
you want them to do?


I thought she was waiting until it was tested before she used it.

Now she's insulting those who do.

Why do you (or anyone else) care what I say about anything?Â* It seems I
live in your heads rent free.



We only care about refuting your idiotic lies.

In alt.home.repair, on Fri, 5 Feb 2021 19:45:25 -0600, Muggles
wrote:

On 2/5/2021 7:05 PM, micky wrote:
In alt.home.repair, on Fri, 5 Feb 2021 16:32:19 -0500, Ed Pawlowski
wrote:

On 2/5/2021 1:38 PM, Muggles wrote:
On 2/5/2021 12:10 PM, Heywood wrote:
On 2/5/2021 12:39 PM, Muggles wrote:
On 2/4/2021 6:38 PM, Rod Speed wrote:


"Muggles" wrote in message
...
On 2/4/2021 12:34 PM, Rod Speed wrote:


"Muggles" wrote in message
...
On 2/3/2021 11:23 AM, Retirednoguilt wrote:

Recent epidemiologic data shows that the group most responsible
for spread of the infection is the 20-49 year old cohort.* They
probably feel that they are much less likely to experience
serious or fatal outcomes than those older (true), but fail to
appreciate that they are the group most likely to give a serious
or fatal case to their older friends, co-workers, and relatives.

There's no way to stop or prevent anyone from catching a virus.

Must be why we didn’t stamp out smallpox, polio and
drastically controlled influenza, measles, mumps etc etc etc.

So, provide the evidence that one person prevented another person
from catching a virus?


All those parents who had enough of a clue to vaccinate
their kids so they didn’t get smallpox, polio, influenza,
measles, mumps etc etc etc.



Those vaccines were TESTED and thoroughly vetted, which includes
learning the major side effects, too.

Try again.** These vaccines have NOT been thoroughly tested.


I'd think 43,000 people is a pretty good test.* Its not like they got
a free pass after 10 people.

If it's a 'pretty good test' to give an unvetted vaccine with unknown
side effects to the general population, then why aren't other vaccines
produced with testing done on the general population?


This is just one company
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-54873105

Their vaccine has been tested on 43,500 people in six countries and no
safety concerns have been raised.

Thats 43K+ guinea pigs.


True, but it proved they work with minimal side effects. What else do
you want them to do?


I thought she was waiting until it was tested before she used it.

Now she's insulting those who do.

Why do you (or anyone else) care what I say about anything? It seems I
live in your heads rent free.

I'm a student of various things including abnormal psychology.

Like I wonder how much of trump is lying and how much is insanity, I
wonder about you how much is trolling and how much you really believe
the stupid things you say.

micky wrote
Muggles wrote
On 2/5/2021 7:05 PM, micky wrote:
In alt.home.repair, on Fri, 5 Feb 2021 16:32:19 -0500, Ed Pawlowski
wrote:

On 2/5/2021 1:38 PM, Muggles wrote:
On 2/5/2021 12:10 PM, Heywood wrote:
On 2/5/2021 12:39 PM, Muggles wrote:
On 2/4/2021 6:38 PM, Rod Speed wrote:


"Muggles" wrote in message
...
On 2/4/2021 12:34 PM, Rod Speed wrote:


"Muggles" wrote in message
...
On 2/3/2021 11:23 AM, Retirednoguilt wrote:

Recent epidemiologic data shows that the group most responsible
for spread of the infection is the 20-49 year old cohort. They
probably feel that they are much less likely to experience
serious or fatal outcomes than those older (true), but fail to
appreciate that they are the group most likely to give a
serious
or fatal case to their older friends, co-workers, and
relatives.

There's no way to stop or prevent anyone from catching a virus.

Must be why we didn't stamp out smallpox, polio and
drastically controlled influenza, measles, mumps etc etc etc.

So, provide the evidence that one person prevented another person
from catching a virus?


All those parents who had enough of a clue to vaccinate
their kids so they didn't get smallpox, polio, influenza,
measles, mumps etc etc etc.



Those vaccines were TESTED and thoroughly vetted, which includes
learning the major side effects, too.

Try again. These vaccines have NOT been thoroughly tested.


I'd think 43,000 people is a pretty good test. Its not like they got
a free pass after 10 people.

If it's a 'pretty good test' to give an unvetted vaccine with unknown
side effects to the general population, then why aren't other vaccines
produced with testing done on the general population?


This is just one company
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-54873105

Their vaccine has been tested on 43,500 people in six countries and
no
safety concerns have been raised.

Thats 43K+ guinea pigs.


True, but it proved they work with minimal side effects. What else do
you want them to do?


I thought she was waiting until it was tested before she used it.

Now she's insulting those who do.

Why do you (or anyone else) care what I say about anything? It seems I
live in your heads rent free.

I'm a student of various things including abnormal psychology.

Like I wonder how much of trump is lying and how much is insanity,

Hard to believe its insanity given how
effective he was at getting to be prez.

And with his admission that he knew that the virus
was a real problem and just lied about that to reduce
the risk to his second term given that the states had
all of the power with lockdowns etc.

I wonder about you how much is trolling and how
much you really believe the stupid things you say.

It appears to all be terminal stupidity to me.

On Sat, 6 Feb 2021 14:26:47 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:


We arent discussing medications, we are discussing VACCINATIONS.

I'm discussing your abnormal trolling, you abnormal trolling senile PEST!

--
Website (from 2007) dedicated to the 86-year-old trolling senile
cretin from Oz:
https://www.pcreview.co.uk/threads/r...d-faq.2973853/

On Sat, 6 Feb 2021 14:37:41 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

FLUSH the trolling senile asshole's latest troll**** unread

--
Sqwertz to Rodent Speed:
"This is just a hunch, but I'm betting you're kinda an argumentative
asshole.
MID:

On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 19:26:01 -0700, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again:


45 million people were vaccinated before the government decided the
risks outweighed the benefits and pulled the plug. My ex had a mild case
of Guillain-Barré. I don't think she's planning on jumping into this one
feet first although she is a high risk.

WTF is wrong with you? You are a worse gossip that any woman I knew,
lowbrowwoman. LOL