Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
OT - 1st time in 175 years - Scientific American endorses JoeBiden
On 9/16/2020 2:04 PM, Bob F wrote:
On 9/16/2020 11:00 AM, Frank wrote: On 9/16/2020 1:31 PM, Bob F wrote: On 9/16/2020 6:51 AM, Ralph Mowery wrote: In article , "frank says... Interesting in that a lot of these old organizations tend to develop a liberal bent.* I've seen it with the American Chemical Society which I belong to and the American Bar Association.* It is almost like an affliction of old age.* Like Biden's senility. It is interisting as how or why some of the older people and orginizations are hating Trump and have many of the younger ones going to the left side also.* Seems that more and more effort is put into hating Trump than getting on with the program of helping the American people. It is interesting that organizations involved in science and fact based issues are not able to swallow the right wing anti science anti reality anti health trump administration's idiotic lying. And you righties here just cannot understand why. Maybe but it did not penetrate your pea brain but I am a scientist. A problem I have seen with many other scientists is they did not survive the indoctrination of their long exposure to liberal academia. Most that entered the real world became aware of what the real world is about, i.e. me. Those that continued in academia usually did not and that includes those that went into large research organizations that are basically a continuation of academia. I find myself guilty responding to you as I know you cannot cure stupidity, Well, you have proven that you cannot for yourself. If you accept trump's never ending lies, you are just another victim of his "herd mentality" solution. .....and there it is....the typical low Democrap IQ response. Frank hit the nail directly. |
#42
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
OT - 1st time in 175 years - Scientific American endorses Joe Biden
Ed Pawlowski writes:
On 9/16/2020 11:06 PM, Bob F wrote: On 9/16/2020 7:53 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote: On 9/16/2020 9:07 PM, Dan Espen wrote: Ed Pawlowski writes: On 9/16/2020 5:30 PM, Ralph Mowery wrote: In article , says... Ed, I read this and I wondered if you actually understood what you were saying.* You started out okay, realizing you are not a scientist. But then you seemed to just dismiss anything a scientist might tell you and instead you assert that you should just use your common sense. I don't know about the scientists, but with Al Gore pushing the gloabal warming and then living in a house big enough for several families it seems to me like a snake oil salesman.* When all the ones preaching global warming start riding aoround in the very small cars and living in homes with around 3 bedrooms like many are, then I will believe them. I understand the hypocrisy but it does not make it any less true.* It is not easy to convince the masses when you fly in on your private jet to tell them to conserve. Geez, the guy is rich.* Shouldn't he be able to travel in comfort? https://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/dail...150208852.html ** For transportation, Gore admits to sometimes chartering a private ** jet but he doesnt own one, claims to be a regular" on Southwest ** Airlines (LUV) and flew to NY last week on American Airlines to ** promote The Climate Reality Projects 24-hour webcast, The Cost of ** Carbon. "Every once in a while I charter but I use public transit and ** commercial airlines, he says. Sure, be comfortable but don't tell me I'm ruining the earth using the same carbon he is using in excess. Is that really what Gore was saying? Been so long since I've listened to the hypocritical windbag I don't recall his exact words. The gist of his shtick was you should use less energy in spite of the fact I use lots of it. But he doesn't use lots of it. Since 2009, his house is solar and geothermal. And as pointed out, he flies mostly commercial like the rest of us. |
#43
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
OT - 1st time in 175 years - Scientific American endorses Joe Biden
Ed Pawlowski writes:
On 9/16/2020 5:58 PM, Dan Espen wrote: Ralph Mowery writes: In article , says... Ed, I read this and I wondered if you actually understood what you were saying. You started out okay, realizing you are not a scientist. But then you seemed to just dismiss anything a scientist might tell you and instead you assert that you should just use your common sense. I don't know about the scientists, but with Al Gore pushing the gloabal warming and then living in a house big enough for several families it seems to me like a snake oil salesman. When all the ones preaching global warming start riding aoround in the very small cars and living in homes with around 3 bedrooms like many are, then I will believe them. Last I heard, Al Gore was not against getting rich and living in a big house. I don't know what the point of this "but he lives in a big house" argument is and I doubt you do either. Just because he's rich doesn't mean he can't care about our future. Sure, do as I say, not as I do. He could try to set a good example. Compare him to Warren Buffet still in the same modest house because he does not need more. https://www.protectingtaxpayers.org/...u-s-household/ Try a better source. https://www.factcheck.org/2009/06/al-gores-mansion/ He is not the guy that should be telling me to drive a smaller car or turn off the AC If you actually paid attention to the facts rather than some political moron at a right-wing site, you'd not make a fool of yourself in public. |
#44
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
OT - 1st time in 175 years - Scientific American endorses JoeBiden
On 9/17/2020 7:12 AM, Hawk wrote:
On 9/16/2020 2:04 PM, Bob F wrote: On 9/16/2020 11:00 AM, Frank wrote: On 9/16/2020 1:31 PM, Bob F wrote: On 9/16/2020 6:51 AM, Ralph Mowery wrote: In article , "frank says... Interesting in that a lot of these old organizations tend to develop a liberal bent.* I've seen it with the American Chemical Society which I belong to and the American Bar Association.* It is almost like an affliction of old age.* Like Biden's senility. It is interisting as how or why some of the older people and orginizations are hating Trump and have many of the younger ones going to the left side also.* Seems that more and more effort is put into hating Trump than getting on with the program of helping the American people. It is interesting that organizations involved in science and fact based issues are not able to swallow the right wing anti science anti reality anti health trump administration's idiotic lying. And you righties here just cannot understand why. Maybe but it did not penetrate your pea brain but I am a scientist. A problem I have seen with many other scientists is they did not survive the indoctrination of their long exposure to liberal academia. Most that entered the real world became aware of what the real world is about, i.e. me. Those that continued in academia usually did not and that includes those that went into large research organizations that are basically a continuation of academia. I find myself guilty responding to you as I know you cannot cure stupidity, Well, you have proven that you cannot for yourself. If you accept trump's never ending lies, you are just another victim of his "herd mentality" solution. ....and there it is....the typical low Democrap IQ response. Frank hit the nail directly. LOL! Pitiful. |
#45
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
OT - 1st time in 175 years - Scientific American endorses JoeBiden
On 9/17/2020 7:10 AM, Hawk wrote:
On 9/16/2020 9:51 AM, Ralph Mowery wrote: In article , "frank says... Interesting in that a lot of these old organizations tend to develop a liberal bent.* I've seen it with the American Chemical Society which I belong to and the American Bar Association.* It is almost like an affliction of old age.* Like Biden's senility. It is interisting as how or why some of the older people and orginizations are hating Trump and have many of the younger ones going to the left side also.* Seems that more and more effort is put into hating Trump than getting on with the program of helping the American people. Welcome to the Democrat's agenda. Low IQ Bob knows how it works. Keep proving how wrong you are. |
#47
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
OT - 1st time in 175 years - Scientific American endorses JoeBiden
On 9/17/2020 12:24 PM, Bob F wrote:
On 9/17/2020 7:12 AM, Hawk wrote: On 9/16/2020 2:04 PM, Bob F wrote: On 9/16/2020 11:00 AM, Frank wrote: On 9/16/2020 1:31 PM, Bob F wrote: On 9/16/2020 6:51 AM, Ralph Mowery wrote: In article , "frank says... Interesting in that a lot of these old organizations tend to develop a liberal bent.* I've seen it with the American Chemical Society which I belong to and the American Bar Association.* It is almost like an affliction of old age.* Like Biden's senility. It is interisting as how or why some of the older people and orginizations are hating Trump and have many of the younger ones going to the left side also.* Seems that more and more effort is put into hating Trump than getting on with the program of helping the American people. It is interesting that organizations involved in science and fact based issues are not able to swallow the right wing anti science anti reality anti health trump administration's idiotic lying. And you righties here just cannot understand why. Maybe but it did not penetrate your pea brain but I am a scientist. A problem I have seen with many other scientists is they did not survive the indoctrination of their long exposure to liberal academia. Most that entered the real world became aware of what the real world is about, i.e. me. Those that continued in academia usually did not and that includes those that went into large research organizations that are basically a continuation of academia. I find myself guilty responding to you as I know you cannot cure stupidity, Well, you have proven that you cannot for yourself. If you accept trump's never ending lies, you are just another victim of his "herd mentality" solution. ....and there it is....the typical low Democrap IQ response. Frank hit the nail directly. LOL! Pitiful. Yes you are. Thanks for confirming it. |
#48
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
OT - 1st time in 175 years - Scientific American endorses JoeBiden
On 9/17/2020 12:26 PM, Bob F wrote:
On 9/17/2020 7:10 AM, Hawk wrote: On 9/16/2020 9:51 AM, Ralph Mowery wrote: In article , "frank says... Interesting in that a lot of these old organizations tend to develop a liberal bent.* I've seen it with the American Chemical Society which I belong to and the American Bar Association.* It is almost like an affliction of old age.* Like Biden's senility. It is interisting as how or why some of the older people and orginizations are hating Trump and have many of the younger ones going to the left side also.* Seems that more and more effort is put into hating Trump than getting on with the program of helping the American people. Welcome to the Democrat's agenda. Low IQ Bob knows how it works. Keep proving how wrong you are. Maybe one day you'll be able to retort with some facts. Naw, who are we kidding, you aren't smart enough to do so. LMFAO! |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
R.V. Jones on scientific intelligence and on the building of scientific instruments | Metalworking | |||
JOE THE PLUMBER? Try "Joe the Fraud" -- Or "Joe the Tax-Dodger" --Or "Joe the Republican Plant" | Home Repair |