Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Something I remember reading a few years ago, probably during the 2016
election campaign. If migrants and border-crossers are forced to enter the US through regular transportation corridors and check-points, the added inspection required to find these people will horribly gum up the flow of manufactured goods and hit all sorts of JIT trucking operations. Hence they want migrants to continue to cross outside the regular corridors. Now whether or not the democrats are being leaned on / pressured or influenced more by manufacturerers and trucking companies to NOT build the wall, for that reason, I don't know, but the Dem's don't talk about that angle. They are consumed, as we know, by the social-justice angle of interfering with what they think is the universal human right of migration. One thing the dem's did say is that the quantity of drugs flowing into the US can only come from vehicular transport (ie not individual migrants) - that is probably true. In which case the solution that trump should propose is a vastly increased commercial inspection program at the US - Mexico border. Where the number of inspection lanes and staffing are increased to find the drugs (and the stow-away migrants) without impacting legit transport. Trump should propse this: a) build the wall b) inspect every vehicle for migrants (which will increase because of A) c) because of (b) you will increase facility inspection capability d) you will intercept more drugs because of (b) and solve that problem also That's what the US needs at the border. But sadly, it also facilitates something that SHOULDN'T HAVE HAPPENED IN THE FIRST PLACE - which is the US/Canada/Mexico NAFTA/NAFTA-2. Mexico has shown that it does not deserve the right to free commerce and access to US/Canada. It does not protect its border with the US and it does not deserve to siphon manufacturing jobs from US/Canada. NAFTA is what gave the US it's drug problem. Because NAFTA allowed US manufacturing to become dependent on an open border with Mexico by relocating facilities there. Once that was done, goods must flow. Nothing must get in the way of goods. Car parts, etc. Border security and inspection must not be allowed to interfere. US politicians must comply with the dictates of US companies and their lobbyists and their campaign contributions. |
#2
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/9/2019 5:05 PM, Home Guy wrote:
Something I remember reading a few years ago, probably during the 2016 election campaign. If migrants and border-crossers are forced to enter the US through regular transportation corridors and check-points, the added inspection required to find these people will horribly gum up the flow of manufactured goods and hit all sorts of JIT trucking operations. Hence they want migrants to continue to cross outside the regular corridors. Now whether or not the democrats are being leaned on / pressured or influenced more by manufacturerers and trucking companies to NOT build the wall, for that reason, I don't know, but the Dem's don't talk about that angle.Â* They are consumed, as we know, by the social-justice angle of interfering with what they think is the universal human right of migration. One thing the dem's did say is that the quantity of drugs flowing into the US can only come from vehicular transport (ie not individual migrants) - that is probably true.Â* In which case the solution that trump should propose is a vastly increased commercial inspection program at the US - Mexico border.Â* Where the number of inspection lanes and staffing are increased to find the drugs (and the stow-away migrants) without impacting legit transport. Trump should propse this: a) build the wall b) inspect every vehicle for migrants (which will increase because of A) c) because of (b) you will increase facility inspection capability d) you will intercept more drugs because of (b) and solve that problem Â*Â* also That's what the US needs at the border. But sadly, it also facilitates something that SHOULDN'T HAVE HAPPENED IN THE FIRST PLACE - which is the US/Canada/Mexico NAFTA/NAFTA-2. Mexico has shown that it does not deserve the right to free commerce and access to US/Canada.Â* It does not protect its border with the US and it does not deserve to siphon manufacturing jobs from US/Canada. NAFTA is what gave the US it's drug problem.Â* Because NAFTA allowed US manufacturing to become dependent on an open border with Mexico by relocating facilities there.Â* Once that was done, goods must flow. Nothing must get in the way of goods.Â* Car parts, etc.Â* Border security and inspection must not be allowed to interfere.Â* US politicians must comply with the dictates of US companies and their lobbyists and their campaign contributions. If trump and his Republican cohorts want to end illegal immigration, all they have to do is start enforcing the laws against HIRING undocumented immigrants. When employers start getting long prison sentences, the problem will be over. Instead, they choose to whip up hysteria about a nonexistant attack of women, fathers, and children looking for a safe life. No wall is needed. |
#3
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
While unnecessarily full-quoting my previoud post, Bob F wrote:
If trump and his Republican cohorts want to end illegal immigration, all they have to do is start enforcing the laws against HIRING undocumented immigrants. When employers start getting long prison sentences, the problem will be over. Why did you full-quote my entire post without responding to anything I said? And no, trump can't enforce stuff like blocking hiring illegal aliens when your stupid-ass states are beoming "sanctuary states" and enacting their own laws making it illegal for employers to inform ICE of said people or even inquiring about the legal status of prospective employees. Instead, they choose to whip up hysteria about a nonexistant attack of women, fathers, and children looking for a safe life. The flow of millions of third-world hispanics into your country is turing the USA into a ****-hole. Sorry but it's true. I don't know why you don't see that. No wall is needed. Not if you are intent on transforming your country into a third-world ****-hole. I guess you don't mind that. |
#4
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob F" wrote in message ... On 1/9/2019 5:05 PM, Home Guy wrote: Something I remember reading a few years ago, probably during the 2016 election campaign. If migrants and border-crossers are forced to enter the US through regular transportation corridors and check-points, the added inspection required to find these people will horribly gum up the flow of manufactured goods and hit all sorts of JIT trucking operations. Hence they want migrants to continue to cross outside the regular corridors. Now whether or not the democrats are being leaned on / pressured or influenced more by manufacturerers and trucking companies to NOT build the wall, for that reason, I don't know, but the Dem's don't talk about that angle. They are consumed, as we know, by the social-justice angle of interfering with what they think is the universal human right of migration. One thing the dem's did say is that the quantity of drugs flowing into the US can only come from vehicular transport (ie not individual migrants) - that is probably true. In which case the solution that trump should propose is a vastly increased commercial inspection program at the US - Mexico border. Where the number of inspection lanes and staffing are increased to find the drugs (and the stow-away migrants) without impacting legit transport. Trump should propse this: a) build the wall b) inspect every vehicle for migrants (which will increase because of A) c) because of (b) you will increase facility inspection capability d) you will intercept more drugs because of (b) and solve that problem also That's what the US needs at the border. But sadly, it also facilitates something that SHOULDN'T HAVE HAPPENED IN THE FIRST PLACE - which is the US/Canada/Mexico NAFTA/NAFTA-2. Mexico has shown that it does not deserve the right to free commerce and access to US/Canada. It does not protect its border with the US and it does not deserve to siphon manufacturing jobs from US/Canada. NAFTA is what gave the US it's drug problem. Because NAFTA allowed US manufacturing to become dependent on an open border with Mexico by relocating facilities there. Once that was done, goods must flow. Nothing must get in the way of goods. Car parts, etc. Border security and inspection must not be allowed to interfere. US politicians must comply with the dictates of US companies and their lobbyists and their campaign contributions. If trump and his Republican cohorts want to end illegal immigration, all they have to do is start enforcing the laws against HIRING undocumented immigrants. Easier said than done, particularly with employers who will go broke if they can't any native to work for them for whatever reason. When employers start getting long prison sentences, Thats not going to happen. the problem will be over. Not when they go bust without that labor. Some will still risk it with an illegal. Instead, they choose to whip up hysteria about a nonexistant attack of women, fathers, and children looking for a safe life. Hardly non existent given that there are 11M of them in the country. No wall is needed. Your approach would cost more than the double fence. |
#5
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, January 9, 2019 at 8:03:07 PM UTC-5, Home Guy wrote:
Something I remember reading a few years ago, probably during the 2016 election campaign. If migrants and border-crossers are forced to enter the US through regular transportation corridors and check-points, the added inspection required to find these people will horribly gum up the flow of manufactured goods and hit all sorts of JIT trucking operations. No logical reason that would happen. The 2,000 a day that are crossing illegally, for the most part, won't present themselves at a point-of-entry, because they know they won't be allowed in. Hence they want migrants to continue to cross outside the regular corridors. Now whether or not the democrats are being leaned on / pressured or influenced more by manufacturerers and trucking companies to NOT build the wall, for that reason, I don't know, but the Dem's don't talk about that angle. They are consumed, as we know, by the social-justice angle of interfering with what they think is the universal human right of migration. One thing the dem's did say is that the quantity of drugs flowing into the US can only come from vehicular transport (ie not individual migrants) - that is probably true. In which case the solution that trump should propose is a vastly increased commercial inspection program at the US - Mexico border. Where the number of inspection lanes and staffing are increased to find the drugs (and the stow-away migrants) without impacting legit transport. Trump should propse this: a) build the wall b) inspect every vehicle for migrants (which will increase because of A) c) because of (b) you will increase facility inspection capability d) you will intercept more drugs because of (b) and solve that problem also That's what the US needs at the border. I agree, something along those lines is very reasonable. Trump would do all of the above and more. It's the Democrats that want open borders and refuse to do anything. They've gone so extreme whacko, that according to their leaders, a wall is now "immoral". But sadly, it also facilitates something that SHOULDN'T HAVE HAPPENED IN THE FIRST PLACE - which is the US/Canada/Mexico NAFTA/NAFTA-2. Mexico has shown that it does not deserve the right to free commerce and access to US/Canada. It does not protect its border with the US It's not Mexico's job to secure their border and keep people in. But I would agree that they certainly could have stopped that caravan from entering their southern border, could have stopped them, detained them, deported them as they openly traveled across Mexico. and it does not deserve to siphon manufacturing jobs from US/Canada. NAFTA is what gave the US it's drug problem. Pure nonsense. We have had a big drug problem for 50 years. And today a lot of that problem is with abuse of prescription drugs. To try to tie the drug problem to illegal aliens and immigration makes little sense. Because NAFTA allowed US manufacturing to become dependent on an open border with Mexico by relocating facilities there. It doesn't depend on an open border, the trade is through legal entry points where inspections take place. Once that was done, goods must flow. Nothing must get in the way of goods. Car parts, etc. Border security and inspection must not be allowed to interfere. US politicians must comply with the dictates of US companies and their lobbyists and their campaign contributions. Sounds like you think countries should just cut themselves off completely from the rest of the world. That's what you'd have to do, because drugs don't only flow here from Mexico via the southern border. They also arrive via boat, airplane, human couriers, even subs. If you somehow magically sealed the MExican border, cut off trade, the drugs would still mostly get here via other means. |
#6
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, January 9, 2019 at 10:07:01 PM UTC-5, Home Guy wrote:
While unnecessarily full-quoting my previoud post, Bob F wrote: If trump and his Republican cohorts want to end illegal immigration, all they have to do is start enforcing the laws against HIRING undocumented immigrants. When employers start getting long prison sentences, the problem will be over. Why did you full-quote my entire post without responding to anything I said? It's what libs do. They can't compete in the arena of ideas, they have to fall back on the party talking points. |
#7
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 09 Jan 2019 22:09:11 -0500, Home Guy wrote:
While unnecessarily full-quoting my previoud post, Bob F wrote: If trump and his Republican cohorts want to end illegal immigration, all they have to do is start enforcing the laws against HIRING undocumented immigrants. When employers start getting long prison sentences, the problem will be over. Why did you full-quote my entire post without responding to anything I said? And no, trump can't enforce stuff like blocking hiring illegal aliens when your stupid-ass states are beoming "sanctuary states" and enacting their own laws making it illegal for employers to inform ICE of said people or even inquiring about the legal status of prospective employees. Instead, they choose to whip up hysteria about a nonexistant attack of women, fathers, and children looking for a safe life. The flow of millions of third-world hispanics into your country is turing the USA into a ****-hole. Sorry but it's true. I don't know why you don't see that. No wall is needed. Not if you are intent on transforming your country into a third-world ****-hole. I guess you don't mind that. Too late. |
#8
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/10/2019 11:53 AM, Clare Snyder wrote:
On Wed, 09 Jan 2019 22:09:11 -0500, Home Guy wrote: While unnecessarily full-quoting my previoud post, Bob F wrote: If trump and his Republican cohorts want to end illegal immigration, all they have to do is start enforcing the laws against HIRING undocumented immigrants. When employers start getting long prison sentences, the problem will be over. Why did you full-quote my entire post without responding to anything I said? And no, trump can't enforce stuff like blocking hiring illegal aliens when your stupid-ass states are beoming "sanctuary states" and enacting their own laws making it illegal for employers to inform ICE of said people or even inquiring about the legal status of prospective employees. Instead, they choose to whip up hysteria about a nonexistant attack of women, fathers, and children looking for a safe life. The flow of millions of third-world hispanics into your country is turing the USA into a ****-hole. Sorry but it's true. I don't know why you don't see that. No wall is needed. Not if you are intent on transforming your country into a third-world ****-hole. I guess you don't mind that. Too late. Yah, we need to build a north wall to keep our socialist frenchtard neighbors out too.Â* ;-) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Someone accused me of being a member of a "CULT"! Because i like little nakkid boys.... | Home Repair | |||
Someone accused me of being a member of a "CULT"! Because i like little nakkid boys.... | Home Repair | |||
Arrow Trucking Shuts Doors | Metalworking | |||
Handel och Konstruktiv Försäljning - Trade, Trucking, and Transportation Corporation | Home Ownership |