Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
Posted here as recommended in another news group: Could you please share with us/me (personal replies are welcome to , if you feel that the group will not benefit), your experience in buying and using front-load (as opposed to top-load with an agitator)? Any comment is appreciated: 1. What make/s & model/s considered? 2. Where bought? 3. What machine was chosen? Make, model 4. User experience? 5. Need for care plan? (the extended warranty) 6. Any other tidbit/s, rebate/s, etc 7. Did the energy consumption agree with the label? 8. Typical got-ya in operating the washer (I'm familiar with the sock-in-the-rubber-seal) 9. If you currently own one, and had some service/reliability issue/s, please elaborate My plan is to make the purchase within the next week or so, in order to take advantage of the provincial PST rebate (OK, I just disclosed that I'm located in Ontario ![]() I've tried to use Consumers reports (last they reported was August 2003), but found it to be very generic, not very informative, and no description of how testing was done (what was the base line). I'm responding because I have a front loader but I have never given buying a washer the thought that you do so I don't think I'll be a great deal of help. :-) I have a GE and bought it because I wanted a washer that was in stockand I could take it with me. My previous washer was a GE that lasted 18 years of heavy use without needing any repairs. I needed a washer that had the controls on the front so I could run a countertop across the top of the washer and dryer. Bought it at a local NJ appliance store which won't help you. Did not get any extended warranty. Have had it probably five or six years now. No problems with it. Never had a sock or anything else in the rubber seal. Very happy with it and would buy another one any time. The only thing to be sure of is that the washer has to be absolutely level. As long as it's level, it works great. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "ns" wrote in message news:86q5c.231120$Hy3.105588@edtnps89... Hello all, Posted here as recommended in another news group: Could you please share with us/me (personal replies are welcome to , if you feel that the group will not benefit), your experience in buying and using front-load (as opposed to top-load with an agitator)? Any comment is appreciated: 1. What make/s & model/s considered? Neptune 2. Where bought? Lowes 3. What machine was chosen? Make, model 4. User experience? absolutely great 5. Need for care plan? (the extended warranty) I did not buy one 6. Any other tidbit/s, rebate/s, etc File the new mover paper work on the net and they will give you 10% off. 7. Did the energy consumption agree with the label? So far yes, 8. Typical got-ya in operating the washer (I'm familiar with the sock-in-the-rubber-seal) Uses 1/2 the water and 1/2 the soap 9. If you currently own one, and had some service/reliability issue/s, please elaborate No problems yet. My plan is to make the purchase within the next week or so, in order to take advantage of the provincial PST rebate (OK, I just disclosed that I'm located in Ontario ![]() I've tried to use Consumers reports (last they reported was August 2003), but found it to be very generic, not very informative, and no description of how testing was done (what was the base line). Thanks in advance to all who reply. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Visit www.google.com and search this newsgroup. You can find plenty of
comments on front loaders. Use the GROUP page. I owned a Neptune for 6 years and gave it to my parents and bought a Kenmore (Whirlpool HE3T) because it is slightly bigger. Both are excellent machines. The Kenmore door is designed poorly and sometimes can lead to clothes being trapped between the seal and door during fast spin and ruin your shirt. It has happened to me and others though it is rare. Some people complain early Neptunes were unreliable but mine was fine. My first Kenmore had so many defects Sears picked it up and gave me a new one which is fine. Either is an excellent washer. For me the biggest advantage is no transmission to break and large capacity. I would probably buy from Sears or their equivalent in your part of the world. Any problem and they take it back. Here they also match prices. I would not buy a Sears extended warranty. Too expensive. I had none for the Maytag but in year 5 Maytag offered me a 3 year one for $330 and I took it. Thought that something was bound to break between year 5 thru 8 though so far nothing has. "ns" wrote in message news:86q5c.231120$Hy3.105588@edtnps89... Hello all, Posted here as recommended in another news group: Could you please share with us/me (personal replies are welcome to , if you feel that the group will not benefit), your experience in buying and using front-load (as opposed to top-load with an agitator)? Any comment is appreciated: 1. What make/s & model/s considered? 2. Where bought? 3. What machine was chosen? Make, model 4. User experience? 5. Need for care plan? (the extended warranty) 6. Any other tidbit/s, rebate/s, etc 7. Did the energy consumption agree with the label? 8. Typical got-ya in operating the washer (I'm familiar with the sock-in-the-rubber-seal) 9. If you currently own one, and had some service/reliability issue/s, please elaborate My plan is to make the purchase within the next week or so, in order to take advantage of the provincial PST rebate (OK, I just disclosed that I'm located in Ontario ![]() I've tried to use Consumers reports (last they reported was August 2003), but found it to be very generic, not very informative, and no description of how testing was done (what was the base line). Thanks in advance to all who reply. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I haven't had any luck with my Neptune, which is just about 2 years old and
has broken twice. The first time, the circuit board needed replacing. It was free, but the labor wasn't! The second time he wasn't able to diagnose the problem. I believe I still paid for that visit. It also doesn't clean clothes nearly as well. I've tried several types of detergents with similar results. The only way to get them really clean and clean smelling is to run the extended cycle, thus negating any water savings. Which, being a "greenie", is why I bought it. Had I the money to do it again, I'd buy one of the new Whirlpools with the new type agitation. "ns" wrote in message news:86q5c.231120$Hy3.105588@edtnps89... Hello all, Posted here as recommended in another news group: Could you please share with us/me (personal replies are welcome to , if you feel that the group will not benefit), your experience in buying and using front-load (as opposed to top-load with an agitator)? Any comment is appreciated: 1. What make/s & model/s considered? 2. Where bought? 3. What machine was chosen? Make, model 4. User experience? 5. Need for care plan? (the extended warranty) 6. Any other tidbit/s, rebate/s, etc 7. Did the energy consumption agree with the label? 8. Typical got-ya in operating the washer (I'm familiar with the sock-in-the-rubber-seal) 9. If you currently own one, and had some service/reliability issue/s, please elaborate My plan is to make the purchase within the next week or so, in order to take advantage of the provincial PST rebate (OK, I just disclosed that I'm located in Ontario ![]() I've tried to use Consumers reports (last they reported was August 2003), but found it to be very generic, not very informative, and no description of how testing was done (what was the base line). Thanks in advance to all who reply. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
ns wrote:
Hello all, Posted here as recommended in another news group: Could you please share with us/me (personal replies are welcome to , if you feel that the group will not benefit), your experience in buying and using front-load (as opposed to top-load with an agitator)? Any comment is appreciated: 1. What make/s & model/s considered? 2. Where bought? 3. What machine was chosen? Make, model 4. User experience? 5. Need for care plan? (the extended warranty) 6. Any other tidbit/s, rebate/s, etc 7. Did the energy consumption agree with the label? 8. Typical got-ya in operating the washer (I'm familiar with the sock-in-the-rubber-seal) 9. If you currently own one, and had some service/reliability issue/s, please elaborate My plan is to make the purchase within the next week or so, in order to take advantage of the provincial PST rebate (OK, I just disclosed that I'm located in Ontario ![]() I've tried to use Consumers reports (last they reported was August 2003), but found it to be very generic, not very informative, and no description of how testing was done (what was the base line). Thanks in advance to all who reply. I have a Frigidaire (a.k.a Electrolux, Gibson, White, etc.) front-loader and have had no problems with it. I got the one a mechanical timer switch mounted on the back console, and electronic water temperature sensors that control the mixing valve. The only thing I don't like is the small door with the rubber seal that's always in the way. And the door opens on the wrong side for my set-up. These are minor nuisances though, not really problems. If the door were reversable, the small port-hole with the rubber seal would be less bothersome. I paid $650 for it a couple of years ago at Best Buy or Sears (I don't remember which) and I got a $100 rebate from the power company. I use regular detergent at 1/2 the recommended rate for most loads, and for really filthy stuff I use either H.E. liquid detergent or a Purex tablet. Best regards, Bob |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just bought the Bosch Axxis washer and dryer set. I chose it over the
Maytag and GE models because I’m so impressed with European engineering. I chose the Bosch over the Asco brand because in my research I asked the part guy which parts are more frequently ordered. He said by far Asco brand. The clincher for me was when my friend who owns the Asco set just had a $400 pump replaced under warranty and he only had it 14 months. Here’s what I like most about the European brands v. American Brands. The extra hot water settings the Europeans use by heating the already hot water to 180 -210+ degrees makes for really bright whites. Add water softener to the detergent and you’ll get brighter whites than bleach could ever do. I love the stackable or not stackable feature. I’m currently using mine stacked with a handy roll out tray between them that I love. The dryer is amazing. I can’t believe how fast clothes dry. Do lots of research, do unconventional research. I’m a big fan of extended Warranties. Plus consider that the Europeans have been designing front loading machines for much longer than Maytag or GE. Undoubtedly they are designing superior products when it comes efficiency. There comes a time in the affairs of man when he must take the bull by the tail and face the situation. -- WCF http://www.utahhousevalues.com |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 22:28:20 GMT, "ns" wrote:
Hello all, Posted here as recommended in another news group: Could you please share with us/me (personal replies are welcome to , if you feel that the group will not benefit), your experience in buying and using front-load (as opposed to top-load with an agitator)? Here's what i learned from my initial research and the last two years of owning. Sears Kenmore front loader, about $1000, dial controls on front, Waterloo Ontario. Don't get sucked in by features. - Most people won't ever use 75% of the different 'types' of wash cycle. So paying more for a machine that has 4 more types isn't usually worth it. - Remember that the 'minimum water used per load' would only happen if you were to try to wash a single shirt for example. But how often does one do that? My machine didn't have the best 'minimum water' usage but had a better average and maximum water usage than some competing models of the same size. Since i always do full loads, that was the more efficient model for me. - Electric controls are much more likely to break down than dial controls. And if the do break down, they are much more expensive to replace. If you plan on putting your dryer on the left hand side of you washer, then getting one where the door can be fastened to swing open either way might be handy. I know some models do. Mine doesn't but i have my dryer on the right. Otherwise i agree with everyone else. They're wonderful. They're more efficient energy and water wise. They wash better. They spin clothes dryer so that the dryer has less work to do. They're quieter. Kevin |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Both Maytag and Kenmore (Whirlpool) have models with water heaters though I
don't know the exact temperature they get to. "Darrell" wrote in message ... I just bought the Bosch Axxis washer and dryer set. I chose it over the Maytag and GE models because I'm so impressed with European engineering. I chose the Bosch over the Asco brand because in my research I asked the part guy which parts are more frequently ordered. He said by far Asco brand. The clincher for me was when my friend who owns the Asco set just had a $400 pump replaced under warranty and he only had it 14 months. Here's what I like most about the European brands v. American Brands. The extra hot water settings the Europeans use by heating the already hot water to 180 -210+ degrees makes for really bright whites. Add water softener to the detergent and you'll get brighter whites than bleach could ever do. I love the stackable or not stackable feature. I'm currently using mine stacked with a handy roll out tray between them that I love. The dryer is amazing. I can't believe how fast clothes dry. Do lots of research, do unconventional research. I'm a big fan of extended Warranties. Plus consider that the Europeans have been designing front loading machines for much longer than Maytag or GE. Undoubtedly they are designing superior products when it comes efficiency. There comes a time in the affairs of man when he must take the bull by the tail and face the situation. -- WCF http://www.utahhousevalues.com |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Are you using HE detergent? All front loaders require it. According to CR,
all of the front loaders wash well with it. What was the second break down? "Betsy" -0 wrote in message ... I haven't had any luck with my Neptune, which is just about 2 years old and has broken twice. The first time, the circuit board needed replacing. It was free, but the labor wasn't! The second time he wasn't able to diagnose the problem. I believe I still paid for that visit. It also doesn't clean clothes nearly as well. I've tried several types of detergents with similar results. The only way to get them really clean and clean smelling is to run the extended cycle, thus negating any water savings. Which, being a "greenie", is why I bought it. Had I the money to do it again, I'd buy one of the new Whirlpools with the new type agitation. "ns" wrote in message news:86q5c.231120$Hy3.105588@edtnps89... Hello all, Posted here as recommended in another news group: Could you please share with us/me (personal replies are welcome to , if you feel that the group will not benefit), your experience in buying and using front-load (as opposed to top-load with an agitator)? Any comment is appreciated: 1. What make/s & model/s considered? 2. Where bought? 3. What machine was chosen? Make, model 4. User experience? 5. Need for care plan? (the extended warranty) 6. Any other tidbit/s, rebate/s, etc 7. Did the energy consumption agree with the label? 8. Typical got-ya in operating the washer (I'm familiar with the sock-in-the-rubber-seal) 9. If you currently own one, and had some service/reliability issue/s, please elaborate My plan is to make the purchase within the next week or so, in order to take advantage of the provincial PST rebate (OK, I just disclosed that I'm located in Ontario ![]() I've tried to use Consumers reports (last they reported was August 2003), but found it to be very generic, not very informative, and no description of how testing was done (what was the base line). Thanks in advance to all who reply. |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, I've always used HE detergents.
The second breakdown (which is evidently still broken) is that it will not spin unless at the last spin cycle. It dumps the water, starts to spin, but cuts off. "Art" wrote in message nk.net... Are you using HE detergent? All front loaders require it. According to CR, all of the front loaders wash well with it. What was the second break down? "Betsy" -0 wrote in message ... I haven't had any luck with my Neptune, which is just about 2 years old and has broken twice. The first time, the circuit board needed replacing. It was free, but the labor wasn't! The second time he wasn't able to diagnose the problem. I believe I still paid for that visit. It also doesn't clean clothes nearly as well. I've tried several types of detergents with similar results. The only way to get them really clean and clean smelling is to run the extended cycle, thus negating any water savings. Which, being a "greenie", is why I bought it. Had I the money to do it again, I'd buy one of the new Whirlpools with the new type agitation. "ns" wrote in message news:86q5c.231120$Hy3.105588@edtnps89... Hello all, Posted here as recommended in another news group: Could you please share with us/me (personal replies are welcome to , if you feel that the group will not benefit), your experience in buying and using front-load (as opposed to top-load with an agitator)? Any comment is appreciated: 1. What make/s & model/s considered? 2. Where bought? 3. What machine was chosen? Make, model 4. User experience? 5. Need for care plan? (the extended warranty) 6. Any other tidbit/s, rebate/s, etc 7. Did the energy consumption agree with the label? 8. Typical got-ya in operating the washer (I'm familiar with the sock-in-the-rubber-seal) 9. If you currently own one, and had some service/reliability issue/s, please elaborate My plan is to make the purchase within the next week or so, in order to take advantage of the provincial PST rebate (OK, I just disclosed that I'm located in Ontario ![]() I've tried to use Consumers reports (last they reported was August 2003), but found it to be very generic, not very informative, and no description of how testing was done (what was the base line). Thanks in advance to all who reply. |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The circuit board may have changed the wash cycles if you had an older
model. They changed the cycle to improve washing. Did it happen right after the board was changed? Also how old is your model. If it is one of the early model it qualifies for a bunch of free fixes. Call the 800 number on the machine and ask Maytag if your machine is supposed to get the mildew fix. It includes a new board, inner door, seal with drain and some other stuff for free. "Betsy" -0 wrote in message ... Yes, I've always used HE detergents. The second breakdown (which is evidently still broken) is that it will not spin unless at the last spin cycle. It dumps the water, starts to spin, but cuts off. "Art" wrote in message nk.net... Are you using HE detergent? All front loaders require it. According to CR, all of the front loaders wash well with it. What was the second break down? "Betsy" -0 wrote in message ... I haven't had any luck with my Neptune, which is just about 2 years old and has broken twice. The first time, the circuit board needed replacing. It was free, but the labor wasn't! The second time he wasn't able to diagnose the problem. I believe I still paid for that visit. It also doesn't clean clothes nearly as well. I've tried several types of detergents with similar results. The only way to get them really clean and clean smelling is to run the extended cycle, thus negating any water savings. Which, being a "greenie", is why I bought it. Had I the money to do it again, I'd buy one of the new Whirlpools with the new type agitation. "ns" wrote in message news:86q5c.231120$Hy3.105588@edtnps89... Hello all, Posted here as recommended in another news group: Could you please share with us/me (personal replies are welcome to , if you feel that the group will not benefit), your experience in buying and using front-load (as opposed to top-load with an agitator)? Any comment is appreciated: 1. What make/s & model/s considered? 2. Where bought? 3. What machine was chosen? Make, model 4. User experience? 5. Need for care plan? (the extended warranty) 6. Any other tidbit/s, rebate/s, etc 7. Did the energy consumption agree with the label? 8. Typical got-ya in operating the washer (I'm familiar with the sock-in-the-rubber-seal) 9. If you currently own one, and had some service/reliability issue/s, please elaborate My plan is to make the purchase within the next week or so, in order to take advantage of the provincial PST rebate (OK, I just disclosed that I'm located in Ontario ![]() I've tried to use Consumers reports (last they reported was August 2003), but found it to be very generic, not very informative, and no description of how testing was done (what was the base line). Thanks in advance to all who reply. |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
One more thing about the Kenmore Whirlpool HE series front loaders. You
need a strong floor. It vibrates a lot more than the Maytag. "ns" wrote in message news:86q5c.231120$Hy3.105588@edtnps89... Hello all, Posted here as recommended in another news group: Could you please share with us/me (personal replies are welcome to , if you feel that the group will not benefit), your experience in buying and using front-load (as opposed to top-load with an agitator)? Any comment is appreciated: 1. What make/s & model/s considered? 2. Where bought? 3. What machine was chosen? Make, model 4. User experience? 5. Need for care plan? (the extended warranty) 6. Any other tidbit/s, rebate/s, etc 7. Did the energy consumption agree with the label? 8. Typical got-ya in operating the washer (I'm familiar with the sock-in-the-rubber-seal) 9. If you currently own one, and had some service/reliability issue/s, please elaborate My plan is to make the purchase within the next week or so, in order to take advantage of the provincial PST rebate (OK, I just disclosed that I'm located in Ontario ![]() I've tried to use Consumers reports (last they reported was August 2003), but found it to be very generic, not very informative, and no description of how testing was done (what was the base line). Thanks in advance to all who reply. |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've had one for two years and love it. It saves me a lot of money on
detergent as it requires very little. Pat |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Note that the HE detergents are more expensive per bottle.
"Patscga" wrote in message ... I've had one for two years and love it. It saves me a lot of money on detergent as it requires very little. Pat |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"ns" wrote in message news:86q5c.231120$Hy3.105588@edtnps89...
Hello all, Posted here as recommended in another news group: Could you please share with us/me (personal replies are welcome to , if you feel that the group will not benefit), your experience in buying and using front-load (as opposed to top-load with an agitator)? Any comment is appreciated: 1. What make/s & model/s considered? 2. Where bought? 3. What machine was chosen? Make, model 4. User experience? 5. Need for care plan? (the extended warranty) 6. Any other tidbit/s, rebate/s, etc 7. Did the energy consumption agree with the label? 8. Typical got-ya in operating the washer (I'm familiar with the sock-in-the-rubber-seal) 9. If you currently own one, and had some service/reliability issue/s, please elaborate My plan is to make the purchase within the next week or so, in order to take advantage of the provincial PST rebate (OK, I just disclosed that I'm located in Ontario ![]() I've tried to use Consumers reports (last they reported was August 2003), but found it to be very generic, not very informative, and no description of how testing was done (what was the base line). Thanks in advance to all who reply. A plug for Miele front load washers. Daughter has used Miele washer and dryer for two years. She says it is great. TB |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: Comments about front-load washing machines
From: "ns" Date: 15/03/04 22:28 GMT Standard Time Message-id: I live in England and have a Front loading washing machine. I have never seen a top loading washing machine apart from on a US website, I dont think that it is possible to buy a top loader in England so I cant really compare Front Loaders and Top Loaders however from what I have heard of US Top Loaders it would seem that they are highly inefficient compared with UK Front Loaders. US Top loaders seem to have some sort of clutch/gearbox arrangement which can go wrong. UK Front Loaders dont have them. US Top Loaders require an agitator which a Front Loader does not need as the clothes are lifted out of the water by the rotation of the drum until they fall back in the water, obviously with less water to heat there is less energy consumption. UK washers fill with only the amount of water required for the load which again saves energy and detergent. I dont know why anyone would make a Top Loader as they seem inefficient to me. My washing machine is a Candy Sprint 1000 and cost me £200, so far it has worked fine and I have never heard of socks getting stuck in the door seal on any Front Loading washing machine. My energy consumption is slightly lower than on the label. I did not buy an extended warranty as my credit card company automaticaly gives me a 2 year warranty on new appliances for free. The only makes I considered were the cheapest with a Grade A energy Efficiency and Wash rating, the Candy was £50 off at the time I bought it. John. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Building Shelves, Load rating for wood 2X4(?) | Metalworking | |||
WHirlpool/Kenmore front load washer | Home Repair | |||
Maytag or Whirlpool front load washers | Home Repair |