On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 22:51:20 -0000, Muggles wrote:

On 2/29/2016 2:45 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 01:10:48 -0000, Muggles wrote:

On 2/8/2016 6:46 PM, Uncle Monster wrote:
On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 12:24:17 PM UTC-6, Muggles wrote:
On 2/8/2016 12:01 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
On 2/8/2016 12:38 PM, Muggles wrote:


Intelligence is only a matter of environment, in addition to,
there are
different kinds of intelligence.

Please explain a bit more. Tell us how genetics is not involved.


**Medical Definition of intelligence. 1a: the ability to learn or
understand or to deal with new or trying situationsb: the ability to
apply knowledge to manipulate one's environment or to think abstractly
as measured by objective criteria (as tests) 2: mental acuteness.**

For example, in Jim's world of one, in that environment, Jim has
adapted
his skill set to his world and environment. How he did that could be a
result of any number of variables: choices, reasoning skills, natural
talents(genetics), maturity, opportunities, etc.

If in Jim's environment he has all the skills he needs to thrive and
prosper, then he's considered to be "intelligent".

OTOH, if Joe, who is from an entirely different world of one and
different environment has a different skill set adapted to his needs to
function and thrive, in his world he could/would also be considered
"intelligent".

If we/they try to compare their skill sets, since they come from
different worlds of one and different environments each could/may judge
the other as not being "intelligent" because the others skill set
doesn't measure up to their own.

Our environment is what determines how intelligence is judged. Without
the context of environment there would be no means in order to judge
intelligence.

Genetics is only one variable out of many that can influence
intelligence. There are also "types of intelligence".

*Gardner chose eight abilities that he held to meet these criteria:
musical-rhythmic, visual-spatial, verbal-linguistic,
logical-mathematical, bodily-kinesthetic, interpersonal, intrapersonal,
and naturalistic. He later suggested that existential and moral
intelligence may also be worthy of
inclusion.(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory...ntelligences)*




One of my favorite movies is,"Idiocracy". Perhaps because I see it
all around me. ^_^

[8~{} Uncle Genius Monster


So, what's your sign .. er, I mean, what's your IQ?

Mine is 135.


OK, thanks for the info. Do you remember which IQ test you took?

Quite a few, similar result +/- 3.

--
Why is a person who plays the piano called a pianist but a person who drives a racing car not called a racist?

On 3/1/2016 11:42 AM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 22:51:20 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 2/29/2016 2:45 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 01:10:48 -0000, Muggles wrote:

On 2/8/2016 6:46 PM, Uncle Monster wrote:
On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 12:24:17 PM UTC-6, Muggles wrote:
On 2/8/2016 12:01 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
On 2/8/2016 12:38 PM, Muggles wrote:


Intelligence is only a matter of environment, in addition to,
there are
different kinds of intelligence.

Please explain a bit more. Tell us how genetics is not involved.


**Medical Definition of intelligence. 1a: the ability to learn or
understand or to deal with new or trying situationsb: the ability to
apply knowledge to manipulate one's environment or to think
abstractly
as measured by objective criteria (as tests) 2: mental acuteness.**

For example, in Jim's world of one, in that environment, Jim has
adapted
his skill set to his world and environment. How he did that could
be a
result of any number of variables: choices, reasoning skills, natural
talents(genetics), maturity, opportunities, etc.

If in Jim's environment he has all the skills he needs to thrive and
prosper, then he's considered to be "intelligent".

OTOH, if Joe, who is from an entirely different world of one and
different environment has a different skill set adapted to his
needs to
function and thrive, in his world he could/would also be considered
"intelligent".

If we/they try to compare their skill sets, since they come from
different worlds of one and different environments each could/may
judge
the other as not being "intelligent" because the others skill set
doesn't measure up to their own.

Our environment is what determines how intelligence is judged.
Without
the context of environment there would be no means in order to judge
intelligence.

Genetics is only one variable out of many that can influence
intelligence. There are also "types of intelligence".

*Gardner chose eight abilities that he held to meet these criteria:
musical-rhythmic, visual-spatial, verbal-linguistic,
logical-mathematical, bodily-kinesthetic, interpersonal,
intrapersonal,
and naturalistic. He later suggested that existential and moral
intelligence may also be worthy of
inclusion.(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory...ntelligences)*





One of my favorite movies is,"Idiocracy". Perhaps because I see it
all around me. ^_^

[8~{} Uncle Genius Monster


So, what's your sign .. er, I mean, what's your IQ?

Mine is 135.


OK, thanks for the info. Do you remember which IQ test you took?

Quite a few, similar result +/- 3.


I took an online test and had a good result, but there's really no way
to compare results unless we took the same test. I was just curious.

--
Maggie

On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 18:34:45 -0000, Muggles wrote:

On 3/1/2016 11:42 AM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 22:51:20 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 2/29/2016 2:45 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 01:10:48 -0000, Muggles wrote:

On 2/8/2016 6:46 PM, Uncle Monster wrote:
On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 12:24:17 PM UTC-6, Muggles wrote:
On 2/8/2016 12:01 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
On 2/8/2016 12:38 PM, Muggles wrote:


Intelligence is only a matter of environment, in addition to,
there are
different kinds of intelligence.

Please explain a bit more. Tell us how genetics is not involved.


**Medical Definition of intelligence. 1a: the ability to learn or
understand or to deal with new or trying situationsb: the ability to
apply knowledge to manipulate one's environment or to think
abstractly
as measured by objective criteria (as tests) 2: mental acuteness.**

For example, in Jim's world of one, in that environment, Jim has
adapted
his skill set to his world and environment. How he did that could
be a
result of any number of variables: choices, reasoning skills, natural
talents(genetics), maturity, opportunities, etc.

If in Jim's environment he has all the skills he needs to thrive and
prosper, then he's considered to be "intelligent".

OTOH, if Joe, who is from an entirely different world of one and
different environment has a different skill set adapted to his
needs to
function and thrive, in his world he could/would also be considered
"intelligent".

If we/they try to compare their skill sets, since they come from
different worlds of one and different environments each could/may
judge
the other as not being "intelligent" because the others skill set
doesn't measure up to their own.

Our environment is what determines how intelligence is judged.
Without
the context of environment there would be no means in order to judge
intelligence.

Genetics is only one variable out of many that can influence
intelligence. There are also "types of intelligence".

*Gardner chose eight abilities that he held to meet these criteria:
musical-rhythmic, visual-spatial, verbal-linguistic,
logical-mathematical, bodily-kinesthetic, interpersonal,
intrapersonal,
and naturalistic. He later suggested that existential and moral
intelligence may also be worthy of
inclusion.(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory...ntelligences)*





One of my favorite movies is,"Idiocracy". Perhaps because I see it
all around me. ^_^

[8~{} Uncle Genius Monster


So, what's your sign .. er, I mean, what's your IQ?

Mine is 135.


OK, thanks for the info. Do you remember which IQ test you took?

Quite a few, similar result +/- 3.


I took an online test and had a good result, but there's really no way
to compare results unless we took the same test. I was just curious.

Pick a test and we'll both do it. Difficult to find a free one though, a lot let you do it then won't tell you the result without you paying.

--
Interesting fact number 184:
In ancient China, people committed suicide by eating a pound of salt.

On 3/1/2016 12:38 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 18:34:45 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 11:42 AM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 22:51:20 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 2/29/2016 2:45 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 01:10:48 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 2/8/2016 6:46 PM, Uncle Monster wrote:
On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 12:24:17 PM UTC-6, Muggles wrote:
On 2/8/2016 12:01 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
On 2/8/2016 12:38 PM, Muggles wrote:


Intelligence is only a matter of environment, in addition to,
there are
different kinds of intelligence.

Please explain a bit more. Tell us how genetics is not involved.


**Medical Definition of intelligence. 1a: the ability to learn or
understand or to deal with new or trying situationsb: the
ability to
apply knowledge to manipulate one's environment or to think
abstractly
as measured by objective criteria (as tests) 2: mental acuteness.**

For example, in Jim's world of one, in that environment, Jim has
adapted
his skill set to his world and environment. How he did that could
be a
result of any number of variables: choices, reasoning skills,
natural
talents(genetics), maturity, opportunities, etc.

If in Jim's environment he has all the skills he needs to thrive
and
prosper, then he's considered to be "intelligent".

OTOH, if Joe, who is from an entirely different world of one and
different environment has a different skill set adapted to his
needs to
function and thrive, in his world he could/would also be considered
"intelligent".

If we/they try to compare their skill sets, since they come from
different worlds of one and different environments each could/may
judge
the other as not being "intelligent" because the others skill set
doesn't measure up to their own.

Our environment is what determines how intelligence is judged.
Without
the context of environment there would be no means in order to
judge
intelligence.

Genetics is only one variable out of many that can influence
intelligence. There are also "types of intelligence".

*Gardner chose eight abilities that he held to meet these criteria:
musical-rhythmic, visual-spatial, verbal-linguistic,
logical-mathematical, bodily-kinesthetic, interpersonal,
intrapersonal,
and naturalistic. He later suggested that existential and moral
intelligence may also be worthy of
inclusion.(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory...ntelligences)*






One of my favorite movies is,"Idiocracy". Perhaps because I see it
all around me. ^_^

[8~{} Uncle Genius Monster


So, what's your sign .. er, I mean, what's your IQ?

Mine is 135.


OK, thanks for the info. Do you remember which IQ test you took?

Quite a few, similar result +/- 3.


I took an online test and had a good result, but there's really no way
to compare results unless we took the same test. I was just curious.

Pick a test and we'll both do it. Difficult to find a free one though,
a lot let you do it then won't tell you the result without you paying.


hmmm first one on the google list is this:
http://www.free-iqtest.net/

Try that one.

--
Maggie

On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 19:07:40 -0000, Muggles wrote:

On 3/1/2016 12:38 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 18:34:45 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 11:42 AM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 22:51:20 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 2/29/2016 2:45 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 01:10:48 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 2/8/2016 6:46 PM, Uncle Monster wrote:
On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 12:24:17 PM UTC-6, Muggles wrote:
On 2/8/2016 12:01 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
On 2/8/2016 12:38 PM, Muggles wrote:


Intelligence is only a matter of environment, in addition to,
there are
different kinds of intelligence.

Please explain a bit more. Tell us how genetics is not involved.


**Medical Definition of intelligence. 1a: the ability to learn or
understand or to deal with new or trying situationsb: the
ability to
apply knowledge to manipulate one's environment or to think
abstractly
as measured by objective criteria (as tests) 2: mental acuteness.**

For example, in Jim's world of one, in that environment, Jim has
adapted
his skill set to his world and environment. How he did that could
be a
result of any number of variables: choices, reasoning skills,
natural
talents(genetics), maturity, opportunities, etc.

If in Jim's environment he has all the skills he needs to thrive
and
prosper, then he's considered to be "intelligent".

OTOH, if Joe, who is from an entirely different world of one and
different environment has a different skill set adapted to his
needs to
function and thrive, in his world he could/would also be considered
"intelligent".

If we/they try to compare their skill sets, since they come from
different worlds of one and different environments each could/may
judge
the other as not being "intelligent" because the others skill set
doesn't measure up to their own.

Our environment is what determines how intelligence is judged.
Without
the context of environment there would be no means in order to
judge
intelligence.

Genetics is only one variable out of many that can influence
intelligence. There are also "types of intelligence".

*Gardner chose eight abilities that he held to meet these criteria:
musical-rhythmic, visual-spatial, verbal-linguistic,
logical-mathematical, bodily-kinesthetic, interpersonal,
intrapersonal,
and naturalistic. He later suggested that existential and moral
intelligence may also be worthy of
inclusion.(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory...ntelligences)*






One of my favorite movies is,"Idiocracy". Perhaps because I see it
all around me. ^_^

[8~{} Uncle Genius Monster


So, what's your sign .. er, I mean, what's your IQ?

Mine is 135.


OK, thanks for the info. Do you remember which IQ test you took?

Quite a few, similar result +/- 3.


I took an online test and had a good result, but there's really no way
to compare results unless we took the same test. I was just curious.

Pick a test and we'll both do it. Difficult to find a free one though,
a lot let you do it then won't tell you the result without you paying.


hmmm first one on the google list is this:
http://www.free-iqtest.net/

Try that one.

142 - https://www.dropbox.com/s/id74yz76rhdv223/iq.jpg?dl=0

--
The Official MBA Handbook on business cards: Avoid overly pretentious job titles such as "Lord of the Realm, Defender of the Faith, Emperor of India" or "Director of Corporate Planning."

On 3/1/2016 1:42 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 19:07:40 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 12:38 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 18:34:45 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 11:42 AM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 22:51:20 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 2/29/2016 2:45 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 01:10:48 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 2/8/2016 6:46 PM, Uncle Monster wrote:
On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 12:24:17 PM UTC-6, Muggles wrote:
On 2/8/2016 12:01 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
On 2/8/2016 12:38 PM, Muggles wrote:


Intelligence is only a matter of environment, in addition to,
there are
different kinds of intelligence.

Please explain a bit more. Tell us how genetics is not
involved.


**Medical Definition of intelligence. 1a: the ability to learn or
understand or to deal with new or trying situationsb: the
ability to
apply knowledge to manipulate one's environment or to think
abstractly
as measured by objective criteria (as tests) 2: mental
acuteness.**

For example, in Jim's world of one, in that environment, Jim has
adapted
his skill set to his world and environment. How he did that
could
be a
result of any number of variables: choices, reasoning skills,
natural
talents(genetics), maturity, opportunities, etc.

If in Jim's environment he has all the skills he needs to thrive
and
prosper, then he's considered to be "intelligent".

OTOH, if Joe, who is from an entirely different world of one and
different environment has a different skill set adapted to his
needs to
function and thrive, in his world he could/would also be
considered
"intelligent".

If we/they try to compare their skill sets, since they come from
different worlds of one and different environments each could/may
judge
the other as not being "intelligent" because the others skill set
doesn't measure up to their own.

Our environment is what determines how intelligence is judged.
Without
the context of environment there would be no means in order to
judge
intelligence.

Genetics is only one variable out of many that can influence
intelligence. There are also "types of intelligence".

*Gardner chose eight abilities that he held to meet these
criteria:
musical-rhythmic, visual-spatial, verbal-linguistic,
logical-mathematical, bodily-kinesthetic, interpersonal,
intrapersonal,
and naturalistic. He later suggested that existential and moral
intelligence may also be worthy of
inclusion.(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory...ntelligences)*







One of my favorite movies is,"Idiocracy". Perhaps because I see it
all around me. ^_^

[8~{} Uncle Genius Monster


So, what's your sign .. er, I mean, what's your IQ?

Mine is 135.


OK, thanks for the info. Do you remember which IQ test you took?

Quite a few, similar result +/- 3.


I took an online test and had a good result, but there's really no way
to compare results unless we took the same test. I was just curious.

Pick a test and we'll both do it. Difficult to find a free one though,
a lot let you do it then won't tell you the result without you paying.


hmmm first one on the google list is this:
http://www.free-iqtest.net/

Try that one.

142 - https://www.dropbox.com/s/id74yz76rhdv223/iq.jpg?dl=0


I didn't take a screenshot, but the result was 141.

--
Maggie

On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 19:50:17 -0000, Muggles wrote:

On 3/1/2016 1:42 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 19:07:40 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 12:38 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 18:34:45 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 11:42 AM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 22:51:20 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 2/29/2016 2:45 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 01:10:48 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 2/8/2016 6:46 PM, Uncle Monster wrote:
On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 12:24:17 PM UTC-6, Muggles wrote:
On 2/8/2016 12:01 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
On 2/8/2016 12:38 PM, Muggles wrote:


Intelligence is only a matter of environment, in addition to,
there are
different kinds of intelligence.

Please explain a bit more. Tell us how genetics is not
involved.


**Medical Definition of intelligence. 1a: the ability to learn or
understand or to deal with new or trying situationsb: the
ability to
apply knowledge to manipulate one's environment or to think
abstractly
as measured by objective criteria (as tests) 2: mental
acuteness.**

For example, in Jim's world of one, in that environment, Jim has
adapted
his skill set to his world and environment. How he did that
could
be a
result of any number of variables: choices, reasoning skills,
natural
talents(genetics), maturity, opportunities, etc.

If in Jim's environment he has all the skills he needs to thrive
and
prosper, then he's considered to be "intelligent".

OTOH, if Joe, who is from an entirely different world of one and
different environment has a different skill set adapted to his
needs to
function and thrive, in his world he could/would also be
considered
"intelligent".

If we/they try to compare their skill sets, since they come from
different worlds of one and different environments each could/may
judge
the other as not being "intelligent" because the others skill set
doesn't measure up to their own.

Our environment is what determines how intelligence is judged.
Without
the context of environment there would be no means in order to
judge
intelligence.

Genetics is only one variable out of many that can influence
intelligence. There are also "types of intelligence".

*Gardner chose eight abilities that he held to meet these
criteria:
musical-rhythmic, visual-spatial, verbal-linguistic,
logical-mathematical, bodily-kinesthetic, interpersonal,
intrapersonal,
and naturalistic. He later suggested that existential and moral
intelligence may also be worthy of
inclusion.(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory...ntelligences)*







One of my favorite movies is,"Idiocracy". Perhaps because I see it
all around me. ^_^

[8~{} Uncle Genius Monster


So, what's your sign .. er, I mean, what's your IQ?

Mine is 135.


OK, thanks for the info. Do you remember which IQ test you took?

Quite a few, similar result +/- 3.


I took an online test and had a good result, but there's really no way
to compare results unless we took the same test. I was just curious.

Pick a test and we'll both do it. Difficult to find a free one though,
a lot let you do it then won't tell you the result without you paying.


hmmm first one on the google list is this:
http://www.free-iqtest.net/

Try that one.

142 - https://www.dropbox.com/s/id74yz76rhdv223/iq.jpg?dl=0

I didn't take a screenshot, but the result was 141.

That makes us both very clever indeed. The average is meant to be 100.
I couldn't get the number series ones, but I got everything else.

--
I got invited to a Muslim party the other night.
It was the fastest game of pass the parcel I've even seen!

On 3/1/2016 2:59 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 19:50:17 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 1:42 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 19:07:40 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 12:38 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 18:34:45 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 11:42 AM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 22:51:20 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 2/29/2016 2:45 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 01:10:48 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 2/8/2016 6:46 PM, Uncle Monster wrote:
On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 12:24:17 PM UTC-6, Muggles wrote:
On 2/8/2016 12:01 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
On 2/8/2016 12:38 PM, Muggles wrote:


Intelligence is only a matter of environment, in addition to,
there are
different kinds of intelligence.

Please explain a bit more. Tell us how genetics is not
involved.


**Medical Definition of intelligence. 1a: the ability to
learn or
understand or to deal with new or trying situationsb: the
ability to
apply knowledge to manipulate one's environment or to think
abstractly
as measured by objective criteria (as tests) 2: mental
acuteness.**

For example, in Jim's world of one, in that environment, Jim
has
adapted
his skill set to his world and environment. How he did that
could
be a
result of any number of variables: choices, reasoning skills,
natural
talents(genetics), maturity, opportunities, etc.

If in Jim's environment he has all the skills he needs to
thrive
and
prosper, then he's considered to be "intelligent".

OTOH, if Joe, who is from an entirely different world of one
and
different environment has a different skill set adapted to his
needs to
function and thrive, in his world he could/would also be
considered
"intelligent".

If we/they try to compare their skill sets, since they come
from
different worlds of one and different environments each
could/may
judge
the other as not being "intelligent" because the others
skill set
doesn't measure up to their own.

Our environment is what determines how intelligence is judged.
Without
the context of environment there would be no means in order to
judge
intelligence.

Genetics is only one variable out of many that can influence
intelligence. There are also "types of intelligence".

*Gardner chose eight abilities that he held to meet these
criteria:
musical-rhythmic, visual-spatial, verbal-linguistic,
logical-mathematical, bodily-kinesthetic, interpersonal,
intrapersonal,
and naturalistic. He later suggested that existential and moral
intelligence may also be worthy of
inclusion.(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory...ntelligences)*








One of my favorite movies is,"Idiocracy". Perhaps because I
see it
all around me. ^_^

[8~{} Uncle Genius Monster


So, what's your sign .. er, I mean, what's your IQ?

Mine is 135.


OK, thanks for the info. Do you remember which IQ test you took?

Quite a few, similar result +/- 3.


I took an online test and had a good result, but there's really no
way
to compare results unless we took the same test. I was just curious.

Pick a test and we'll both do it. Difficult to find a free one
though,
a lot let you do it then won't tell you the result without you paying.


hmmm first one on the google list is this:
http://www.free-iqtest.net/

Try that one.

142 - https://www.dropbox.com/s/id74yz76rhdv223/iq.jpg?dl=0

I didn't take a screenshot, but the result was 141.

That makes us both very clever indeed. The average is meant to be 100.
I couldn't get the number series ones, but I got everything else.


The number series questions were easiest for me.

There are scores of different tests to take and they'd all show
different results. This one was just a short 20 question test. I took
another one that was 43 questions, but got tired because many of the
questions were repetitive.

--
Maggie

On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 23:15:28 -0000, Muggles wrote:

On 3/1/2016 2:59 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 19:50:17 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 1:42 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 19:07:40 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 12:38 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 18:34:45 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 11:42 AM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 22:51:20 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 2/29/2016 2:45 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 01:10:48 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 2/8/2016 6:46 PM, Uncle Monster wrote:
On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 12:24:17 PM UTC-6, Muggles wrote:
On 2/8/2016 12:01 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
On 2/8/2016 12:38 PM, Muggles wrote:


Intelligence is only a matter of environment, in addition to,
there are
different kinds of intelligence.

Please explain a bit more. Tell us how genetics is not
involved.


**Medical Definition of intelligence. 1a: the ability to
learn or
understand or to deal with new or trying situationsb: the
ability to
apply knowledge to manipulate one's environment or to think
abstractly
as measured by objective criteria (as tests) 2: mental
acuteness.**

For example, in Jim's world of one, in that environment, Jim
has
adapted
his skill set to his world and environment. How he did that
could
be a
result of any number of variables: choices, reasoning skills,
natural
talents(genetics), maturity, opportunities, etc.

If in Jim's environment he has all the skills he needs to
thrive
and
prosper, then he's considered to be "intelligent".

OTOH, if Joe, who is from an entirely different world of one
and
different environment has a different skill set adapted to his
needs to
function and thrive, in his world he could/would also be
considered
"intelligent".

If we/they try to compare their skill sets, since they come
from
different worlds of one and different environments each
could/may
judge
the other as not being "intelligent" because the others
skill set
doesn't measure up to their own.

Our environment is what determines how intelligence is judged.
Without
the context of environment there would be no means in order to
judge
intelligence.

Genetics is only one variable out of many that can influence
intelligence. There are also "types of intelligence".

*Gardner chose eight abilities that he held to meet these
criteria:
musical-rhythmic, visual-spatial, verbal-linguistic,
logical-mathematical, bodily-kinesthetic, interpersonal,
intrapersonal,
and naturalistic. He later suggested that existential and moral
intelligence may also be worthy of
inclusion.(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory...ntelligences)*








One of my favorite movies is,"Idiocracy". Perhaps because I
see it
all around me. ^_^

[8~{} Uncle Genius Monster


So, what's your sign .. er, I mean, what's your IQ?

Mine is 135.


OK, thanks for the info. Do you remember which IQ test you took?

Quite a few, similar result +/- 3.


I took an online test and had a good result, but there's really no
way
to compare results unless we took the same test. I was just curious.

Pick a test and we'll both do it. Difficult to find a free one
though,
a lot let you do it then won't tell you the result without you paying.


hmmm first one on the google list is this:
http://www.free-iqtest.net/

Try that one.

142 - https://www.dropbox.com/s/id74yz76rhdv223/iq.jpg?dl=0

I didn't take a screenshot, but the result was 141.

That makes us both very clever indeed. The average is meant to be 100.
I couldn't get the number series ones, but I got everything else.


The number series questions were easiest for me.

There are scores of different tests to take and they'd all show
different results. This one was just a short 20 question test. I took
another one that was 43 questions, but got tired because many of the
questions were repetitive.

What were the series about? I should have looked at the answers at the end. I could see no match in the numbers apart from the easy one that was just adding the previous two numbers together.

--
A girl phoned me the other day and said, "Come on over, there's nobody home."
I went over. Nobody was home.

On 3/1/2016 5:20 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 23:15:28 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 2:59 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 19:50:17 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 1:42 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 19:07:40 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 12:38 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 18:34:45 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 11:42 AM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 22:51:20 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 2/29/2016 2:45 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 01:10:48 -0000, Muggles

wrote:

On 2/8/2016 6:46 PM, Uncle Monster wrote:
On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 12:24:17 PM UTC-6, Muggles
wrote:
On 2/8/2016 12:01 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
On 2/8/2016 12:38 PM, Muggles wrote:


Intelligence is only a matter of environment, in
addition to,
there are
different kinds of intelligence.

Please explain a bit more. Tell us how genetics is not
involved.


**Medical Definition of intelligence. 1a: the ability to
learn or
understand or to deal with new or trying situationsb: the
ability to
apply knowledge to manipulate one's environment or to think
abstractly
as measured by objective criteria (as tests) 2: mental
acuteness.**

For example, in Jim's world of one, in that environment, Jim
has
adapted
his skill set to his world and environment. How he did that
could
be a
result of any number of variables: choices, reasoning skills,
natural
talents(genetics), maturity, opportunities, etc.

If in Jim's environment he has all the skills he needs to
thrive
and
prosper, then he's considered to be "intelligent".

OTOH, if Joe, who is from an entirely different world of one
and
different environment has a different skill set adapted to
his
needs to
function and thrive, in his world he could/would also be
considered
"intelligent".

If we/they try to compare their skill sets, since they come
from
different worlds of one and different environments each
could/may
judge
the other as not being "intelligent" because the others
skill set
doesn't measure up to their own.

Our environment is what determines how intelligence is
judged.
Without
the context of environment there would be no means in
order to
judge
intelligence.

Genetics is only one variable out of many that can influence
intelligence. There are also "types of intelligence".

*Gardner chose eight abilities that he held to meet these
criteria:
musical-rhythmic, visual-spatial, verbal-linguistic,
logical-mathematical, bodily-kinesthetic, interpersonal,
intrapersonal,
and naturalistic. He later suggested that existential and
moral
intelligence may also be worthy of
inclusion.(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory...ntelligences)*









One of my favorite movies is,"Idiocracy". Perhaps because I
see it
all around me. ^_^

[8~{} Uncle Genius Monster


So, what's your sign .. er, I mean, what's your IQ?

Mine is 135.


OK, thanks for the info. Do you remember which IQ test you took?

Quite a few, similar result +/- 3.


I took an online test and had a good result, but there's really no
way
to compare results unless we took the same test. I was just
curious.

Pick a test and we'll both do it. Difficult to find a free one
though,
a lot let you do it then won't tell you the result without you
paying.


hmmm first one on the google list is this:
http://www.free-iqtest.net/

Try that one.

142 - https://www.dropbox.com/s/id74yz76rhdv223/iq.jpg?dl=0

I didn't take a screenshot, but the result was 141.

That makes us both very clever indeed. The average is meant to be 100.
I couldn't get the number series ones, but I got everything else.


The number series questions were easiest for me.

There are scores of different tests to take and they'd all show
different results. This one was just a short 20 question test. I took
another one that was 43 questions, but got tired because many of the
questions were repetitive.

What were the series about? I should have looked at the answers at the
end. I could see no match in the numbers apart from the easy one that
was just adding the previous two numbers together.


mmmmm I don't remember all of them, but they all had a pattern to them.
One question was like "Jim likes X number but doesn't like Y number,
with several examples". The pattern was all the numbers Jim liked were
Squared, or you could take the square root of the number and get a whole
number vs. a decimal. That one was kind of cool.

--
Maggie

On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 23:32:31 -0000, Muggles wrote:

On 3/1/2016 5:20 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 23:15:28 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 2:59 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 19:50:17 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 1:42 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 19:07:40 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 12:38 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 18:34:45 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 11:42 AM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 22:51:20 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 2/29/2016 2:45 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 01:10:48 -0000, Muggles

wrote:

On 2/8/2016 6:46 PM, Uncle Monster wrote:
On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 12:24:17 PM UTC-6, Muggles
wrote:
On 2/8/2016 12:01 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
On 2/8/2016 12:38 PM, Muggles wrote:


Intelligence is only a matter of environment, in
addition to,
there are
different kinds of intelligence.

Please explain a bit more. Tell us how genetics is not
involved.


**Medical Definition of intelligence. 1a: the ability to
learn or
understand or to deal with new or trying situationsb: the
ability to
apply knowledge to manipulate one's environment or to think
abstractly
as measured by objective criteria (as tests) 2: mental
acuteness.**

For example, in Jim's world of one, in that environment, Jim
has
adapted
his skill set to his world and environment. How he did that
could
be a
result of any number of variables: choices, reasoning skills,
natural
talents(genetics), maturity, opportunities, etc.

If in Jim's environment he has all the skills he needs to
thrive
and
prosper, then he's considered to be "intelligent".

OTOH, if Joe, who is from an entirely different world of one
and
different environment has a different skill set adapted to
his
needs to
function and thrive, in his world he could/would also be
considered
"intelligent".

If we/they try to compare their skill sets, since they come
from
different worlds of one and different environments each
could/may
judge
the other as not being "intelligent" because the others
skill set
doesn't measure up to their own.

Our environment is what determines how intelligence is
judged.
Without
the context of environment there would be no means in
order to
judge
intelligence.

Genetics is only one variable out of many that can influence
intelligence. There are also "types of intelligence".

*Gardner chose eight abilities that he held to meet these
criteria:
musical-rhythmic, visual-spatial, verbal-linguistic,
logical-mathematical, bodily-kinesthetic, interpersonal,
intrapersonal,
and naturalistic. He later suggested that existential and
moral
intelligence may also be worthy of
inclusion.(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory...ntelligences)*









One of my favorite movies is,"Idiocracy". Perhaps because I
see it
all around me. ^_^

[8~{} Uncle Genius Monster


So, what's your sign .. er, I mean, what's your IQ?

Mine is 135.


OK, thanks for the info. Do you remember which IQ test you took?

Quite a few, similar result +/- 3.


I took an online test and had a good result, but there's really no
way
to compare results unless we took the same test. I was just
curious.

Pick a test and we'll both do it. Difficult to find a free one
though,
a lot let you do it then won't tell you the result without you
paying.


hmmm first one on the google list is this:
http://www.free-iqtest.net/

Try that one.

142 - https://www.dropbox.com/s/id74yz76rhdv223/iq.jpg?dl=0

I didn't take a screenshot, but the result was 141.

That makes us both very clever indeed. The average is meant to be 100.
I couldn't get the number series ones, but I got everything else.


The number series questions were easiest for me.

There are scores of different tests to take and they'd all show
different results. This one was just a short 20 question test. I took
another one that was 43 questions, but got tired because many of the
questions were repetitive.

What were the series about? I should have looked at the answers at the
end. I could see no match in the numbers apart from the easy one that
was just adding the previous two numbers together.


mmmmm I don't remember all of them, but they all had a pattern to them.
One question was like "Jim likes X number but doesn't like Y number,
with several examples". The pattern was all the numbers Jim liked were
Squared, or you could take the square root of the number and get a whole
number vs. a decimal. That one was kind of cool.

That one was easy. The ones I didn't understand were the 1-2-7-19-25-173 - which number doesn't fit in the series ones.

--
I'm not so think as you drunk I am...

On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 23:32:31 -0000, Muggles wrote:

On 3/1/2016 5:20 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 23:15:28 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 2:59 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 19:50:17 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 1:42 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 19:07:40 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 12:38 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 18:34:45 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 11:42 AM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 22:51:20 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 2/29/2016 2:45 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 01:10:48 -0000, Muggles

wrote:

On 2/8/2016 6:46 PM, Uncle Monster wrote:
On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 12:24:17 PM UTC-6, Muggles
wrote:
On 2/8/2016 12:01 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
On 2/8/2016 12:38 PM, Muggles wrote:


Intelligence is only a matter of environment, in
addition to,
there are
different kinds of intelligence.

Please explain a bit more. Tell us how genetics is not
involved.


**Medical Definition of intelligence. 1a: the ability to
learn or
understand or to deal with new or trying situationsb: the
ability to
apply knowledge to manipulate one's environment or to think
abstractly
as measured by objective criteria (as tests) 2: mental
acuteness.**

For example, in Jim's world of one, in that environment, Jim
has
adapted
his skill set to his world and environment. How he did that
could
be a
result of any number of variables: choices, reasoning skills,
natural
talents(genetics), maturity, opportunities, etc.

If in Jim's environment he has all the skills he needs to
thrive
and
prosper, then he's considered to be "intelligent".

OTOH, if Joe, who is from an entirely different world of one
and
different environment has a different skill set adapted to
his
needs to
function and thrive, in his world he could/would also be
considered
"intelligent".

If we/they try to compare their skill sets, since they come
from
different worlds of one and different environments each
could/may
judge
the other as not being "intelligent" because the others
skill set
doesn't measure up to their own.

Our environment is what determines how intelligence is
judged.
Without
the context of environment there would be no means in
order to
judge
intelligence.

Genetics is only one variable out of many that can influence
intelligence. There are also "types of intelligence".

*Gardner chose eight abilities that he held to meet these
criteria:
musical-rhythmic, visual-spatial, verbal-linguistic,
logical-mathematical, bodily-kinesthetic, interpersonal,
intrapersonal,
and naturalistic. He later suggested that existential and
moral
intelligence may also be worthy of
inclusion.(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory...ntelligences)*









One of my favorite movies is,"Idiocracy". Perhaps because I
see it
all around me. ^_^

[8~{} Uncle Genius Monster


So, what's your sign .. er, I mean, what's your IQ?

Mine is 135.


OK, thanks for the info. Do you remember which IQ test you took?

Quite a few, similar result +/- 3.


I took an online test and had a good result, but there's really no
way
to compare results unless we took the same test. I was just
curious.

Pick a test and we'll both do it. Difficult to find a free one
though,
a lot let you do it then won't tell you the result without you
paying.


hmmm first one on the google list is this:
http://www.free-iqtest.net/

Try that one.

142 - https://www.dropbox.com/s/id74yz76rhdv223/iq.jpg?dl=0

I didn't take a screenshot, but the result was 141.

That makes us both very clever indeed. The average is meant to be 100.
I couldn't get the number series ones, but I got everything else.


The number series questions were easiest for me.

There are scores of different tests to take and they'd all show
different results. This one was just a short 20 question test. I took
another one that was 43 questions, but got tired because many of the
questions were repetitive.

What were the series about? I should have looked at the answers at the
end. I could see no match in the numbers apart from the easy one that
was just adding the previous two numbers together.


mmmmm I don't remember all of them, but they all had a pattern to them.
One question was like "Jim likes X number but doesn't like Y number,
with several examples". The pattern was all the numbers Jim liked were
Squared, or you could take the square root of the number and get a whole
number vs. a decimal. That one was kind of cool.

That one was easy. The ones I didn't understand were the 1-2-7-19-25-173 - which number doesn't fit in the series ones.

--
I'm not so think as you drunk I am...

On 3/1/2016 5:34 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 23:32:31 -0000, Muggles

The number series questions were easiest for me.

There are scores of different tests to take and they'd all show
different results. This one was just a short 20 question test. I took
another one that was 43 questions, but got tired because many of the
questions were repetitive.

What were the series about? I should have looked at the answers at the
end. I could see no match in the numbers apart from the easy one that
was just adding the previous two numbers together.


mmmmm I don't remember all of them, but they all had a pattern to them.
One question was like "Jim likes X number but doesn't like Y number,
with several examples". The pattern was all the numbers Jim liked were
Squared, or you could take the square root of the number and get a whole
number vs. a decimal. That one was kind of cool.

That one was easy. The ones I didn't understand were the
1-2-7-19-25-173 - which number doesn't fit in the series ones.


Those were grouped patterns. Like, the first 4 digits had a grouped
pattern, and then next 4 digits had a different grouped pattern to them.
--
Maggie

On Wed, 02 Mar 2016 00:06:57 -0000, Muggles wrote:

On 3/1/2016 5:34 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 23:32:31 -0000, Muggles

The number series questions were easiest for me.

There are scores of different tests to take and they'd all show
different results. This one was just a short 20 question test. I took
another one that was 43 questions, but got tired because many of the
questions were repetitive.

What were the series about? I should have looked at the answers at the
end. I could see no match in the numbers apart from the easy one that
was just adding the previous two numbers together.


mmmmm I don't remember all of them, but they all had a pattern to them.
One question was like "Jim likes X number but doesn't like Y number,
with several examples". The pattern was all the numbers Jim liked were
Squared, or you could take the square root of the number and get a whole
number vs. a decimal. That one was kind of cool.

That one was easy. The ones I didn't understand were the
1-2-7-19-25-173 - which number doesn't fit in the series ones.


Those were grouped patterns. Like, the first 4 digits had a grouped
pattern, and then next 4 digits had a different grouped pattern to them.

Ah, I never looked beyond three - like 2 3 6, 2x3=6

This is why I suck at chess.

--
What's the German word for Vaseline?
Vienerslide.

On 3/1/2016 6:09 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Wed, 02 Mar 2016 00:06:57 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 5:34 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 23:32:31 -0000, Muggles

The number series questions were easiest for me.

There are scores of different tests to take and they'd all show
different results. This one was just a short 20 question test. I
took
another one that was 43 questions, but got tired because many of the
questions were repetitive.

What were the series about? I should have looked at the answers at
the
end. I could see no match in the numbers apart from the easy one that
was just adding the previous two numbers together.


mmmmm I don't remember all of them, but they all had a pattern to
them.
One question was like "Jim likes X number but doesn't like Y number,
with several examples". The pattern was all the numbers Jim liked were
Squared, or you could take the square root of the number and get a
whole
number vs. a decimal. That one was kind of cool.

That one was easy. The ones I didn't understand were the
1-2-7-19-25-173 - which number doesn't fit in the series ones.

Those were grouped patterns. Like, the first 4 digits had a grouped
pattern, and then next 4 digits had a different grouped pattern to them.

Ah, I never looked beyond three - like 2 3 6, 2x3=6

This is why I suck at chess.

I'm still learning chess, but mostly study the moves of the games when I
play different people. Sometimes, I win, sometimes, not. I'm starting
to recognize moves 3 or 4 ahead, now. I play it on my smartphone, too.


--
Maggie

On 3/1/2016 2:50 PM, Muggles wrote:
On 3/1/2016 1:42 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 19:07:40 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 12:38 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 18:34:45 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 11:42 AM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 22:51:20 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 2/29/2016 2:45 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 01:10:48 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 2/8/2016 6:46 PM, Uncle Monster wrote:
On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 12:24:17 PM UTC-6, Muggles wrote:
On 2/8/2016 12:01 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
On 2/8/2016 12:38 PM, Muggles wrote:


Intelligence is only a matter of environment, in addition to,
there are
different kinds of intelligence.


[christmas presents]

On 3/1/2016 6:32 PM, Muggles wrote:
On 3/1/2016 5:20 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 23:15:28 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 2:59 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 19:50:17 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 1:42 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 19:07:40 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 12:38 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 18:34:45 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 11:42 AM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 22:51:20 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 2/29/2016 2:45 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 01:10:48 -0000, Muggles

wrote:

On 2/8/2016 6:46 PM, Uncle Monster wrote:
On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 12:24:17 PM UTC-6, Muggles
wrote:
On 2/8/2016 12:01 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
On 2/8/2016 12:38 PM, Muggles wrote:


Intelligence is only a matter of environment, in
addition to,
there are
different kinds of intelligence.

Please explain a bit more. Tell us how genetics is not
involved.

This is the 4th Christmas tree I've deleted, in a row.
Might be time to filter you off my computer. What do
you think?

On 3/1/2016 9:39 PM, Stormin Mormon wrote:
On 3/1/2016 2:50 PM, Muggles wrote:

different kinds of intelligence.



[christmas presents]



Where?

--
Maggie

On 3/1/2016 9:41 PM, Stormin Mormon wrote:
On 3/1/2016 6:32 PM, Muggles wrote:
On 3/1/2016 5:20 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 23:15:28 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 2:59 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 19:50:17 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 1:42 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 19:07:40 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 12:38 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 18:34:45 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 11:42 AM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 22:51:20 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 2/29/2016 2:45 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 01:10:48 -0000, Muggles

wrote:

On 2/8/2016 6:46 PM, Uncle Monster wrote:
On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 12:24:17 PM UTC-6, Muggles
wrote:
On 2/8/2016 12:01 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
On 2/8/2016 12:38 PM, Muggles wrote:


Intelligence is only a matter of environment, in
addition to,
there are
different kinds of intelligence.

Please explain a bit more. Tell us how genetics is not
involved.


This is the 4th Christmas tree I've deleted, in a row.
Might be time to filter you off my computer. What do
you think?


ummm I kind of think it's silly.

I don't understand why this bugs you so much? Long quoted text
trails/tails happen with just about everyone. I trim some, and I forget
to trim, some. If I open a post that's longer than what I want to read,
I just skip that post.

--
Maggie

On 02/03/2016 03:59, Muggles wrote:
On 3/1/2016 9:41 PM, Stormin Mormon wrote:
On 3/1/2016 6:32 PM, Muggles wrote:
On 3/1/2016 5:20 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 23:15:28 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 2:59 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 19:50:17 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 1:42 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 19:07:40 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 12:38 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 18:34:45 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 11:42 AM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 22:51:20 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 2/29/2016 2:45 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 01:10:48 -0000, Muggles

wrote:

On 2/8/2016 6:46 PM, Uncle Monster wrote:
On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 12:24:17 PM UTC-6, Muggles
wrote:
On 2/8/2016 12:01 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
On 2/8/2016 12:38 PM, Muggles wrote:


Intelligence is only a matter of environment, in
addition to,
there are
different kinds of intelligence.

Please explain a bit more. Tell us how genetics is not
involved.


This is the 4th Christmas tree I've deleted, in a row.
Might be time to filter you off my computer. What do
you think?


ummm I kind of think it's silly.

I don't understand why this bugs you so much? Long quoted text
trails/tails happen with just about everyone. I trim some, and I forget
to trim, some. If I open a post that's longer than what I want to read,
I just skip that post.

Yup, it's not rocket surgery.

--
Bod

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Tuesday, March 1, 2016 at 9:41:47 PM UTC-6, Stormin Mormon wrote:
On 3/1/2016 6:32 PM, Muggles wrote:
On 3/1/2016 5:20 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 23:15:28 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 2:59 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 19:50:17 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 1:42 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 19:07:40 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 12:38 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 18:34:45 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 11:42 AM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 22:51:20 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 2/29/2016 2:45 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 01:10:48 -0000, Muggles

wrote:

On 2/8/2016 6:46 PM, Uncle Monster wrote:
On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 12:24:17 PM UTC-6, Muggles
wrote:
On 2/8/2016 12:01 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
On 2/8/2016 12:38 PM, Muggles wrote:


Intelligence is only a matter of environment, in
addition to,
there are
different kinds of intelligence.

Please explain a bit more. Tell us how genetics is not
involved.

This is the 4th Christmas tree I've deleted, in a row.
Might be time to filter you off my computer. What do
you think?

Me too! Me too! I wanna be filtered! ^_^

[8~{} Uncle Christmas Monster

On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 2:56:26 AM UTC-6, Bod wrote:
On 02/03/2016 03:59, Muggles wrote:
On 3/1/2016 9:41 PM, Stormin Mormon wrote:
On 3/1/2016 6:32 PM, Muggles wrote:
On 3/1/2016 5:20 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 23:15:28 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 2:59 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 19:50:17 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 1:42 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 19:07:40 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 12:38 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 18:34:45 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 11:42 AM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 22:51:20 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 2/29/2016 2:45 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 01:10:48 -0000, Muggles

wrote:

On 2/8/2016 6:46 PM, Uncle Monster wrote:
On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 12:24:17 PM UTC-6, Muggles
wrote:
On 2/8/2016 12:01 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
On 2/8/2016 12:38 PM, Muggles wrote:


Intelligence is only a matter of environment, in
addition to,
there are
different kinds of intelligence.

Please explain a bit more. Tell us how genetics is not
involved.

This is the 4th Christmas tree I've deleted, in a row.
Might be time to filter you off my computer. What do
you think?

ummm I kind of think it's silly.

I don't understand why this bugs you so much? Long quoted text
trails/tails happen with just about everyone. I trim some, and I forget
to trim, some. If I open a post that's longer than what I want to read,
I just skip that post.

Yup, it's not rocket surgery.
--
Bod
---

My mouse has a scroll wheel on it that works great for reading a long post. It only take a few seconds to get from the top to the bottom. o_O

[8~{} Uncle Scroll Monster

On Wed, 02 Mar 2016 03:39:57 -0000, Stormin Mormon wrote:

On 3/1/2016 2:50 PM, Muggles wrote:
On 3/1/2016 1:42 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 19:07:40 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 12:38 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 18:34:45 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 11:42 AM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 22:51:20 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 2/29/2016 2:45 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 01:10:48 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 2/8/2016 6:46 PM, Uncle Monster wrote:
On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 12:24:17 PM UTC-6, Muggles wrote:
On 2/8/2016 12:01 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
On 2/8/2016 12:38 PM, Muggles wrote:


Intelligence is only a matter of environment, in addition to,
there are
different kinds of intelligence.


[christmas presents]

[what?]

--
The only substitute for good manners is fast reflexes.

On Wed, 02 Mar 2016 03:55:17 -0000, Muggles wrote:

On 3/1/2016 9:39 PM, Stormin Mormon wrote:
On 3/1/2016 2:50 PM, Muggles wrote:

different kinds of intelligence.



[christmas presents]



Where?

He's lost it. He is religious after all.

--
The only substitute for good manners is fast reflexes.

On Wed, 02 Mar 2016 03:41:56 -0000, Stormin Mormon wrote:

On 3/1/2016 6:32 PM, Muggles wrote:
On 3/1/2016 5:20 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 23:15:28 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 2:59 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 19:50:17 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 1:42 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 19:07:40 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 12:38 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 18:34:45 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 3/1/2016 11:42 AM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 22:51:20 -0000, Muggles
wrote:

On 2/29/2016 2:45 PM, Mr Macaw wrote:
On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 01:10:48 -0000, Muggles

wrote:

On 2/8/2016 6:46 PM, Uncle Monster wrote:
On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 12:24:17 PM UTC-6, Muggles
wrote:
On 2/8/2016 12:01 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
On 2/8/2016 12:38 PM, Muggles wrote:


Intelligence is only a matter of environment, in
addition to,
there are
different kinds of intelligence.

Please explain a bit more. Tell us how genetics is not
involved.

This is the 4th Christmas tree I've deleted, in a row.
Might be time to filter you off my computer. What do
you think?

I think you should boil your religion filled head in sesame seed oil, then get a ****ing life.

--
In the UK, 90% of things are prohibited. The other 10% are compulsory.