Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 53
Default Circuit box upgrade question(s)

I am having my electrician buddy help me replace an old circuit box in a
fairly old house. Much of the wiring is old and cloth covered from the
40's. What happens if one of the wires we are replacing breaks or is too
short to reach the breakers in the new panel? Do those broken wires have to
be spliced with wire nuts to a new piece of wire and then the splice section
mounted in a new junction box outside of the new panel? That could get ugly
very quickly but my limited knowledge of the NEC says splices have to be
with approved connectors and inside junction boxes.

Will he have the tools to determine if any of the wiring in the house has
decayed enough to present a fire hazard? Do you measure the resistance of
the wire from the panel to the eventual load? I know that one very long run
to the kitchen reads 105 volts with the microwave on when the voltage at the
breaker serving that run is at 119 volts. This is a run that has been used,
apparently, for years with a 20A breaker even though the wire apparently is
only 14 gauge. We will be correcting that by wiring it to a 15A breaker

Also, he talked about "balancing the load" within the panel. Why is that
important?

This may sound like a stupid question but why are the breakers staggered? I
thought the A hot coming in on the left fed all the breakers on the left and
the B hot of the right fed all the breakers on the right. Apparently not.
Why?

Any other pointers on panel upgrades or sites where I could learn more about
the process? I've been watching a bunch of so-so YouTube videos, but they
don't seem to answer the questions I have.

I've already gone through the panel and marked down which wires go where by
shutting each breaker off in turn and making note of what outlets and lights
were no longer powered. My buddy said that's often the worst part of a
panel replacement. I assume the wires have to be properly labeled as they
come off the old panel and get attached to the new one. Would a Brother
label printer do the job? Would it pay to get the kind of labeling tape
that's actually heat shrink tubing? Would it be code-worthy to label each
wire like that permanently?

Some of the cloth covered original wiring looks awfully frayed. I am
guessing that it's not code to sleeve them with plastic shrink tubing but I
suspect the real fix is to replace the wire which would about quintuple the
price of this job.

Would this be a good time to check the house's grounding system? How do you
measure the quality of the house's ground?

I'm assuming that he's going to know all of this stuff, but I'd like to be
as well-informed as I can about what problems we might be facing since I
will be assisting (mostly holding the flashlight or heading out to Home
Depot if we don't have everything we need).

I was also wondering if it would be prudent to place an externally mounted
shutoff for the whole house between the meter and the box? As it stands now
any work on the panel involves disconnecting the smart meter and a shut-off
would eliminate that step.

Thanks in advance for any advice . . .

TKS


  #2   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 901
Default Circuit box upgrade question(s)

On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 04:31:33 -0500, "Texas Kingsnake"
wrote:

I am having my electrician buddy help me replace an old circuit box in a
fairly old house. Much of the wiring is old and cloth covered from the
40's. What happens if one of the wires we are replacing breaks or is too
short to reach the breakers in the new panel? Do those broken wires have to
be spliced with wire nuts to a new piece of wire and then the splice section
mounted in a new junction box outside of the new panel? That could get ugly
very quickly but my limited knowledge of the NEC says splices have to be
with approved connectors and inside junction boxes.


You just apply the wirenuts inside the breaker box. That box is a
(junction box) as far as the code. Of course try to get the wires to
breakers that are possible to do without splicing if possible.

Unless this has changed in recent years, you CAN put heat shrink over
old wires, as long as they are not bare from insulation breakdown.
That old cloth covered wire was pretty durable, except if it was exposed
to heat, like in boxes above enclosed light bulbs. Then it got real dry
and often broke off the wire. Modern LED and CF bulbs would not be such
a heat problem, but the old filament bulbs were tough on those wires.

A lot of old tube type electronics also used that cloth wire, and some
had very high voltages.


  #3   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,279
Default Circuit box upgrade question(s)

On Friday, February 5, 2016 at 4:47:12 AM UTC-5, Texas Kingsnake wrote:
I am having my electrician buddy help me replace an old circuit box in a
fairly old house. Much of the wiring is old and cloth covered from the
40's. What happens if one of the wires we are replacing breaks or is too
short to reach the breakers in the new panel? Do those broken wires have to
be spliced with wire nuts to a new piece of wire and then the splice section
mounted in a new junction box outside of the new panel? That could get ugly
very quickly but my limited knowledge of the NEC says splices have to be
with approved connectors and inside junction boxes.


You can do the splice within the new panel.



Will he have the tools to determine if any of the wiring in the house has
decayed enough to present a fire hazard?


Unlikely, IDK that such a tool commonly exists or is used.



Do you measure the resistance of
the wire from the panel to the eventual load?


You could, but don't know anyone that does that, nor is it very probative.
If you have a loose/poor connection which it would show, you'd likely
have seen symptoms, eg dim lights, flickering, etc. And resistance isn't
going to show frayed wiring about to short, etc.


I know that one very long run
to the kitchen reads 105 volts with the microwave on when the voltage at the
breaker serving that run is at 119 volts. This is a run that has been used,
apparently, for years with a 20A breaker even though the wire apparently is
only 14 gauge. We will be correcting that by wiring it to a 15A breaker


That is more than is desireable, which would be under 5%. Since that run
has a large load and is suspect, I'd run a new 20A circuit.


Also, he talked about "balancing the load" within the panel. Why is that
important?


You want to try to distribute the 120V circuits so that about half
the total load is on one hot leg, half on the other. That keeps the
load on the neutral down. It's always going to be unbalanced to some
extent, you just don't want to put all the loads, or all the large
loads, on one leg.




This may sound like a stupid question but why are the breakers staggered? I
thought the A hot coming in on the left fed all the breakers on the left and
the B hot of the right fed all the breakers on the right. Apparently not.
Why?


So that you can put in a 240V breaker, which needs to connect to both hots.



Any other pointers on panel upgrades or sites where I could learn more about
the process? I've been watching a bunch of so-so YouTube videos, but they
don't seem to answer the questions I have.

I've already gone through the panel and marked down which wires go where by
shutting each breaker off in turn and making note of what outlets and lights
were no longer powered. My buddy said that's often the worst part of a
panel replacement. I assume the wires have to be properly labeled as they
come off the old panel and get attached to the new one. Would a Brother
label printer do the job? Would it pay to get the kind of labeling tape
that's actually heat shrink tubing? Would it be code-worthy to label each
wire like that permanently?


I wouldn't waste my time. Some temporary tape, then labeling the new
breakers once the panel is in works for me.



Some of the cloth covered original wiring looks awfully frayed. I am
guessing that it's not code to sleeve them with plastic shrink tubing but I
suspect the real fix is to replace the wire which would about quintuple the
price of this job.


Can't say how bad it is, but if it's fraying and in bad shape, I would
do the re-wire because of the risk. If you don't then I'd put in
AFCI for all the breakers that are on the old, suspect run.




Would this be a good time to check the house's grounding system?


Yes.

How do you
measure the quality of the house's ground?


IDK, good question. In most cases, I think they just go with what
works. For example, if you have a metal cold water line going to
a well or city water, that works for me. Current code requires an
additional electrode, typically a ground rod.




I'm assuming that he's going to know all of this stuff, but I'd like to be
as well-informed as I can about what problems we might be facing since I
will be assisting (mostly holding the flashlight or heading out to Home
Depot if we don't have everything we need).

I was also wondering if it would be prudent to place an externally mounted
shutoff for the whole house between the meter and the box? As it stands now
any work on the panel involves disconnecting the smart meter and a shut-off
would eliminate that step.


Work is done all the time inside the panel, replacing a breaker for example,
without pulling the meter. You just shut off the main breaker, which leaves
everything after it off. You just have to stay away from where the feed
comes in at the top. There are new panels available that have that top
section under a separate cover, eliminating even that small risk.


Thanks in advance for any advice . . .

TKS


Is the existing feed adequate? How many amps? Any new loads, eg AC,
in your future? Now is the time to make sure you have enough capacity.
  #4   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 53
Default Circuit box upgrade question(s)

"trader_4" wrote in message
...
On Friday, February 5, 2016 at 4:47:12 AM UTC-5, Texas Kingsnake wrote:
I am having my electrician buddy help me replace an old circuit box in a
fairly old house. Much of the wiring is old and cloth covered from the
40's. What happens if one of the wires we are replacing breaks or is

too
short to reach the breakers in the new panel? Do those broken wires

have to
be spliced with wire nuts to a new piece of wire and then the splice

section
mounted in a new junction box outside of the new panel? That could get

ugly
very quickly but my limited knowledge of the NEC says splices have to be
with approved connectors and inside junction boxes.


You can do the splice within the new panel.

That helps. This old panel's neutral wires are very, very short and I
suspect it's going to be a bit problem depending on where the neutral bus is
located in the new panel. He's bought that so all I can do is keep my
fingers x'ed.


Will he have the tools to determine if any of the wiring in the house

has
decayed enough to present a fire hazard?


Unlikely, IDK that such a tool commonly exists or is used.

He was talking about having some sort of expensive analyzer tool that can
reveal a number of defects in the wiring - what they were he didn't say but
I am looking forward to working with him this weekend if only to pick his
brain. All the YouTube videos have been helpful. I had no idea that the
ground and neutral busses are aluminum and the wires entering them need to
be slathered up with Noalox. The new panels I see in the videos differ a
lot from what I have. One guy says to meet inspection requirement all wires
going into buss bars have to go through completely so that you can see a
little bit of the wire protruding through the other side of the bar.

Do you measure the resistance of
the wire from the panel to the eventual load?


You could, but don't know anyone that does that, nor is it very probative.
If you have a loose/poor connection which it would show, you'd likely
have seen symptoms, eg dim lights, flickering, etc. And resistance isn't
going to show frayed wiring about to short, etc.

That makes sense. Thanks. I am worried about the old wiring though and
pulling new wire would be an enormous amount of work. As far as I can see,
the fraying is only bad where the sheathing has been stripped back. White
wires are now rather brownish-yellow.


I know that one very long run
to the kitchen reads 105 volts with the microwave on when the voltage at

the
breaker serving that run is at 119 volts. This is a run that has been

used,
apparently, for years with a 20A breaker even though the wire apparently

is
only 14 gauge. We will be correcting that by wiring it to a 15A breaker


That is more than is desireable, which would be under 5%. Since that run
has a large load and is suspect, I'd run a new 20A circuit.

BIG frown I am beginning to suspect that's going to be what happens but
right now we've run over budget with AFCI breakers going to the bedrooms and
the possibility of having to install a new ground. I've added 15% to cover
unexpected contingencies, but that was a rather low but hopeful estimate.


Also, he talked about "balancing the load" within the panel. Why is

that
important?


You want to try to distribute the 120V circuits so that about half
the total load is on one hot leg, half on the other. That keeps the
load on the neutral down. It's always going to be unbalanced to some
extent, you just don't want to put all the loads, or all the large
loads, on one leg.


I have to confess, although I've read a lot and watched a number of videos,
I'm still not very "up" on - not even sure what to call it - multiphase
circuits. As in why doesn't the neutral from the pole have to be larger
than either hot feed because it carries the return curent from both hots?
Not necessary that I do understand since I am just a helper, but it would be
nice to know.

This may sound like a stupid question but why are the breakers

staggered? I
thought the A hot coming in on the left fed all the breakers on the left

and
the B hot of the right fed all the breakers on the right. Apparently

not.
Why?


So that you can put in a 240V breaker, which needs to connect to both

hots.


Is that why the 240 breakers appear to be double-size - they're contacting
two different places on the internal power buss?

Any other pointers on panel upgrades or sites where I could learn more

about
the process? I've been watching a bunch of so-so YouTube videos, but

they
don't seem to answer the questions I have.

I've already gone through the panel and marked down which wires go where

by
shutting each breaker off in turn and making note of what outlets and

lights
were no longer powered. My buddy said that's often the worst part of a
panel replacement. I assume the wires have to be properly labeled as

they
come off the old panel and get attached to the new one. Would a Brother
label printer do the job? Would it pay to get the kind of labeling tape
that's actually heat shrink tubing? Would it be code-worthy to label

each
wire like that permanently?


I wouldn't waste my time. Some temporary tape, then labeling the new
breakers once the panel is in works for me.


Sounds reasonable. I want it to be neat but I realize that just a temporary
label is all that's needed to land the wire in the right place in the new
panel.



Some of the cloth covered original wiring looks awfully frayed. I am
guessing that it's not code to sleeve them with plastic shrink tubing

but I
suspect the real fix is to replace the wire which would about quintuple

the
price of this job.


Can't say how bad it is, but if it's fraying and in bad shape, I would
do the re-wire because of the risk. If you don't then I'd put in
AFCI for all the breakers that are on the old, suspect run.


I did spec 4 AFCI's but for the bedrooms and that wire's ironically in the
best of shape. I would have done the whole panel with AFCI's until my buddy
told me what that would cost. Didn't seem worth it but I'll discuss it
again. If it's that much of a safety advantage it might be worth it. I
might want to try to find out how many arc fault fires there are in the US
each year to gage the odds.




Would this be a good time to check the house's grounding system?


Yes.

How do you
measure the quality of the house's ground?


IDK, good question. In most cases, I think they just go with what
works. For example, if you have a metal cold water line going to
a well or city water, that works for me. Current code requires an
additional electrode, typically a ground rod.


I've read about grounds called Ufers (one site claims that a direct
lightning hit can destroy your foundation - I am assuming that's a Ufer
ground built into a new home's foundation. It sounds like I would bury a
Ufer close to the building. Still researching that.




I'm assuming that he's going to know all of this stuff, but I'd like to

be
as well-informed as I can about what problems we might be facing since I
will be assisting (mostly holding the flashlight or heading out to Home
Depot if we don't have everything we need).

I was also wondering if it would be prudent to place an externally

mounted
shutoff for the whole house between the meter and the box? As it stands

now
any work on the panel involves disconnecting the smart meter and a

shut-off
would eliminate that step.


Work is done all the time inside the panel, replacing a breaker for

example,
without pulling the meter. You just shut off the main breaker, which

leaves
everything after it off. You just have to stay away from where the feed
comes in at the top. There are new panels available that have that top
section under a separate cover, eliminating even that small risk.


Ironically the replacement is because the 100A breaker in the old panel was
heat damaged. If you recall, the hot on one side had lost its Noalox and
began arcing and the heat (measured at over 200F) damaged the breaker. My
electrician buddy pulled the feed wire, cleaned it (no apparent heat
discoloration), gooped it up with Noalox and then tightened it back down
when the set screw stripped.


Thanks in advance for any advice . . .

TKS


Is the existing feed adequate? How many amps? Any new loads, eg AC,
in your future? Now is the time to make sure you have enough capacity.


I've been measuring the loads with a clamp meter. Maximum load hovers at 50
to 60 amps. I assume that 200A service (what he says I have) is good enough
for that kind of load. That was with everything I could think of turned on
and two space heaters running at 15A each.

Thanks for all your help. Are you an electrician? You sound like one!
This sort of feedback will allow me ask smarter questions of my electrician
buddy.

TKS


  #5   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 53
Default Circuit box upgrade question(s)

wrote in message
...
On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 04:31:33 -0500, "Texas Kingsnake"
wrote:

I am having my electrician buddy help me replace an old circuit box in a
fairly old house. Much of the wiring is old and cloth covered from the
40's. What happens if one of the wires we are replacing breaks or is too
short to reach the breakers in the new panel? Do those broken wires have

to
be spliced with wire nuts to a new piece of wire and then the splice

section
mounted in a new junction box outside of the new panel? That could get

ugly
very quickly but my limited knowledge of the NEC says splices have to be
with approved connectors and inside junction boxes.


You just apply the wirenuts inside the breaker box. That box is a
(junction box) as far as the code. Of course try to get the wires to
breakers that are possible to do without splicing if possible.

That's up to Lady Luck at the moement. It may mean rearranging the wires
from the current scheme.

Unless this has changed in recent years, you CAN put heat shrink over
old wires, as long as they are not bare from insulation breakdown.
That old cloth covered wire was pretty durable, except if it was exposed
to heat, like in boxes above enclosed light bulbs. Then it got real dry
and often broke off the wire. Modern LED and CF bulbs would not be such
a heat problem, but the old filament bulbs were tough on those wires.

A lot of old tube type electronics also used that cloth wire, and some
had very high voltages.

The problem, other than age, was that these cloth covered wires entered the
box directly above the 100A breaker that was generating a lot of heat for
who knows how long because of the bad connection. The feed into the 100A
breaker starting sparking - it turns out that the set screw on hot feed from
meter stripped - right now my electrician friend's got it patched with a
tapered piece of stranded 10 gage wire shoved into the hole to eliminate any
air gaps. That's held for quite a while but it is now time to "do it
right!" I guess we won't know how bad the wires really are until we
disconnect them all.

Thanks for you help, Paint.

TKS




  #6   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,228
Default Circuit box upgrade question(s)


"Texas Kingsnake" wrote in message
...

I have to confess, although I've read a lot and watched a number of
videos,
I'm still not very "up" on - not even sure what to call it - multiphase
circuits. As in why doesn't the neutral from the pole have to be larger
than either hot feed because it carries the return curent from both hots?
Not necessary that I do understand since I am just a helper, but it would
be
nice to know.


The normal home in the US if fed with a 240 volt transformer with a center
tap.
If using only 240 volt devices such as a water heater the center tap
(neutral) is not hooked up. When using the 120 volt devices you hook one
wire to one of the hot wires and one to the neutral. If you have 2 lamps
that each has a 100 watt lamp in them and they are on the same side of the
transformer then the neutral has to carry the full current. If you hook them
to eahc side of the transformer and they are execatlly equal (which will not
hapen in real life,but will be close) then no current will flow in the
neutral wire and you could actually do away with it. If you have a 100 watt
bulb on one side and a 60 watt bulb on the other side,then there is an
unballance and this curent will flow in the neutral. It would be the equal
of having just one 40 watt bulb hooked up.

That is why you try to ballance the load. Maybe put the refrigerator on one
side and the room with the TV on the other side. Also put say the kitchen
lights on one side and the living room lights on the other side. Those are
usually the two most often used lights that may be on at the same time.


  #7   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,279
Default Circuit box upgrade question(s)

On Friday, February 5, 2016 at 9:25:40 AM UTC-5, Texas Kingsnake wrote:


I have to confess, although I've read a lot and watched a number of videos,
I'm still not very "up" on - not even sure what to call it - multiphase
circuits. As in why doesn't the neutral from the pole have to be larger
than either hot feed because it carries the return curent from both hots?
Not necessary that I do understand since I am just a helper, but it would be
nice to know.


The neutral doesn't carry all the current. It only carries the unbalanced
portion. If you have 30A flowing on one hot, 20A on the other, the
service neutral has 10A. If instead both legs have 20A, then the current
in the neutral is zero.

Draw a simple circuit with two 120V batteries in series that drive
two 3 ohm resistors in series. Connect the midpoint of the batteries with
the midpoint of the resistors. That's essentially what you have with
a balanced load. 20A is flowing, but nothing in the wire between
the midpoint of the batteries and the midpoint of the resistors. Now
change the resistors so one is 4 ohms, the other 2 ohms. Now the load
is unbalanced and you have current flowing in the midpoint (neutral)
connection.








This may sound like a stupid question but why are the breakers

staggered? I
thought the A hot coming in on the left fed all the breakers on the left

and
the B hot of the right fed all the breakers on the right. Apparently

not.
Why?


So that you can put in a 240V breaker, which needs to connect to both

hots.


Is that why the 240 breakers appear to be double-size - they're contacting
two different places on the internal power buss?


Bingo.


AFCI for all the breakers that are on the old, suspect run.

I did spec 4 AFCI's but for the bedrooms and that wire's ironically in the
best of shape. I would have done the whole panel with AFCI's until my buddy
told me what that would cost. Didn't seem worth it but I'll discuss it
again. If it's that much of a safety advantage it might be worth it. I
might want to try to find out how many arc fault fires there are in the US
each year to gage the odds.


I don't know what current code is on AFCI requirements, but AFAIK,
it's beyond just bedrooms now. I think most living areas require it,
but Gfre here can give you the correct answer. Anyplace with old,
suspect wiring, I'd put them on all the circuits that have that old
wiring.






Would this be a good time to check the house's grounding system?


Yes.

How do you
measure the quality of the house's ground?


IDK, good question. In most cases, I think they just go with what
works. For example, if you have a metal cold water line going to
a well or city water, that works for me. Current code requires an
additional electrode, typically a ground rod.


I've read about grounds called Ufers (one site claims that a direct
lightning hit can destroy your foundation - I am assuming that's a Ufer
ground built into a new home's foundation. It sounds like I would bury a
Ufer close to the building. Still researching that.


I ufer is a concrete encased electrode that uses the cement pour of
the building during new construction. You need a simple ground rod.





Ironically the replacement is because the 100A breaker in the old panel was
heat damaged. If you recall, the hot on one side had lost its Noalox and
began arcing and the heat (measured at over 200F) damaged the breaker. My
electrician buddy pulled the feed wire, cleaned it (no apparent heat
discoloration), gooped it up with Noalox and then tightened it back down
when the set screw stripped.


Thanks in advance for any advice . . .

TKS


Is the existing feed adequate? How many amps? Any new loads, eg AC,
in your future? Now is the time to make sure you have enough capacity.


I've been measuring the loads with a clamp meter. Maximum load hovers at 50
to 60 amps. I assume that 200A service (what he says I have) is good enough
for that kind of load. That was with everything I could think of turned on
and two space heaters running at 15A each.


So, new panel is 200A then?



Thanks for all your help. Are you an electrician? You sound like one!
This sort of feedback will allow me ask smarter questions of my electrician
buddy.

TKS


I'm an electrical engineer.
  #8   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 14,141
Default Circuit box upgrade question(s)

On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 05:26:07 -0600, wrote:

You just apply the wirenuts inside the breaker box. That box is a
(junction box) as far as the code.


That is not exactly true.
From the code...
"312.8 Enclosures for Switches or Overcurrent Devices.
Enclosures for switches or overcurrent devices shall not be used as
junction boxes,"

It goes on to say
"conductors, splices, and taps shall not fill the wiring space at any
cross section to more than 75 percent of the cross-sectional area of
that space."

That can start a fist fight at an inspector meeting about exactly how
much excess space is available in a given panel. You will also hear
the argument that a splice does not count at all in "wire fill".

Home inspectors are known to flag a single wire nut in a panelboard
enclosure but most of them are ignorant of the actual code.

If this is being inspected, ask your AHJ what their opinion is about
it. Neatness really counts here. If it looks OK, I am willing to let
it go.

Most panels have several places where you can add grounding buses so
that can help with the ground wires and even the neutrals if this is
the service disconnect enclosure but be sure to loop a #4 wire between
all of them if you are using them for the neutral since you can't use
the screws into the can for neutral current. (250.6)
Again I would verify that with the AHJ.

It is OK to depend on the mounting screws if you are just connecting
ground wires.

Another option is to use one of these mounted near the top of the
panel for your splices.
http://www.mcmelectronics.com/product/27-5986
  #9   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 901
Default Circuit box upgrade question(s)

On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 10:47:35 -0500, wrote:


Another option is to use one of these mounted near the top of the
panel for your splices.
http://www.mcmelectronics.com/product/27-5986

I used to use things similar to that in the old electronics chassis.
Some appliances use similar things...

I'm not sure that would be code approved in the US for inside a breaker
panel ??????

  #10   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,879
Default Circuit box upgrade question(s)

On 2/5/2016 2:31 AM, Texas Kingsnake wrote:
I am having my electrician buddy help me replace an old circuit box in a
fairly old house. Much of the wiring is old and cloth covered from the
40's.


Knob and tube?

What happens if one of the wires we are replacing breaks or is too
short to reach the breakers in the new panel?


This is what makes electrical work "interesting"! (not)

Do your homework and try to reshuffle the placement of the breakers
so you can attach each branch circuit to *a* breaker -- even if it
is not in the same physical position as previously.
Lots of attention to detail can also be a win when selecting a new
panel -- to minimize the distance the wires "need" to travel to
reach their corresponding breakers (don't forget about the neutral
connections, as well!)

Do those broken wires have to
be spliced with wire nuts to a new piece of wire and then the splice section
mounted in a new junction box outside of the new panel? That could get ugly
very quickly but my limited knowledge of the NEC says splices have to be
with approved connectors and inside junction boxes.


Have you considered using one or more subpanels as a "cheat"?

Will he have the tools to determine if any of the wiring in the house has
decayed enough to present a fire hazard? Do you measure the resistance of
the wire from the panel to the eventual load?


The "wire" (i.e., "conductor") won't degrade/decay (when copper "rusts",
it forms a greenish oxide layer) but, rather, the insulation may be
a problem -- especially where it may have experienced mechanical wear
(like in the panel and terminal Jboxes -- lots of flexing as it is
connected/reconnected)

I know that one very long run
to the kitchen reads 105 volts with the microwave on when the voltage at the
breaker serving that run is at 119 volts. This is a run that has been used,
apparently, for years with a 20A breaker even though the wire apparently is
only 14 gauge. We will be correcting that by wiring it to a 15A breaker


frown Sure to get flagged by an inspection. For "efficiency", you
typically only want a 3-5% voltage drop under load. Wire is "sized" so
the heat generated in the conductor is safe for the insulation chosen
(the wire won't melt but the insulation will degrade).

SERIOUSLY consider running two new 20A countertop feeds into the kitchen.
Most of a home's AC is consumed in the kitchen. You'd also like to avail
yourself of GFCI and AFCI protections.

[I think we have 5 or 6 circuits feeding our kitchen, not counting the
oven/refrigerator/lighting]

And, chances are, you have all "two wire" circuits -- no earth/safety ground
available at your loads.

Also, he talked about "balancing the load" within the panel. Why is that
important?


The AC line feeding your residence is really two 120V lines wired one "atop"
the other. Sort of like putting two 120V batteries in series:

120V 120V
+XXXXXX- +XXXXXX-

A N B

The "neutral" wire is connected to the middle -- at 0V. So, you can think
of one "leg" as being +120V (i.e., at 'A') the other as being -120V (at 'B').

But, as this is AC and not DC, the 'A' point is really continuously varying
("alternating" as in "alternating current") between +120V and -120V while, at
the same time, the 'B' point is alternating between -120V and +120V!

[there's a bit of a lie, here, but not one that is material to the discussion]

For a 120V appliance, it "sees" the 'A' (or 'B'!) leg alternating between
+120 and -120 with the other wire connected to neutral (0V). Thus, 120V AC!
The load current flows "from" the 'A' (or 'B') to the load, through the
load and then returns on the neutral. (all of the electricity flowing OUT
the A -- or B -- ends up coming *back* on the neutral. A "closed loop")

For a 220V (240) appliance, it sees one leg alternating between +120 and -120
while the other leg is alternating between -120 and +120. So, there's
240V AC *across* the device -- and the neutral wire is not involved!

Because A and B are "opposites" (A is positive while B is negative and A is
negative while B is positive), the "neutral current" from an appliance fed
from the 'A' leg is "opposite" what the neutral current from an appliance
fed from the 'B' leg; one is "going" while the other is "coming".

As you bring the loads on the 'A' and 'B' legs into balance, the neutral
current from that 'A' loads cancels out the neutral current from the 'B'
loads thereby reducing the current flowing in *THE* neutral (from the
power company).

If you consider the "two batteries in series" example, above, you can
see that the electric utility would prefer that you "load" each battery
similarly; why include the second battery if folks are just going to
put EVERYTHING on the first??

[The batteries are really transformers -- technically, a *single* transformer
with a "tap" in the center. If you're only using one half of the transformer,
then all of the heat is generated in that "winding" while the other is just
taking up space, so to speak]

This may sound like a stupid question but why are the breakers staggered? I
thought the A hot coming in on the left fed all the breakers on the left and
the B hot of the right fed all the breakers on the right. Apparently not.
Why?


When you remove the panel (or, when it has had all of the breakers
removed), the reason will be obvious. : It's just easier to make it
that way!

Any other pointers on panel upgrades or sites where I could learn more about
the process? I've been watching a bunch of so-so YouTube videos, but they
don't seem to answer the questions I have.

I've already gone through the panel and marked down which wires go where by
shutting each breaker off in turn and making note of what outlets and lights
were no longer powered. My buddy said that's often the worst part of a
panel replacement.


Methinks he exaggerates! : It's just tedious, not really "bad".
I prepared a scale floorplan of this house and adorned it with notations
of each Jbox, circuit number, etc. just so I could KNOW where everything
went. I.e., which breaker controls power to the smoke detectors??

When you are done, be sure to walk through the house and verify you have
identified the breaker for EVERY outlet/switch -- to make sure you haven't
missed something (which you might want to *change* in the process!)

I.e., did you remember the outlet behind the refrigerator? For the garbage
disposal? Garage door opener? Front porch light? Dishwasher? etc.

I assume the wires have to be properly labeled as they
come off the old panel and get attached to the new one.


Yes. Otherwise, you will have the panel disconnected (no power in your house!)
while you run around trying to figure out what each wire does. Easier to
do this BEFORE you turn off the power (and inconvenience the occupant)

Would a Brother label printer do the job?


Pro'ly. You might find it difficult to get the label tape to stick to the
(cloth/asphalt) wires. As such, you might want to use a "flag" sort of
attachment (wrap label around wire and adhere it to *itself*).

Note that you probably want the power off on the panel if you're going
to be messing around with individual conductors. It only takes an
ohnosecond to cook yourself!

Would it pay to get the kind of labeling tape
that's actually heat shrink tubing?


No. That would require you to disconnect each wire before labeling.
I.e., you'd only be doing that when you'd shut off power to the panel
(and then you're back to the "inconvenience" issue, above).

Would it be code-worthy to label each
wire like that permanently?


No. Labels can be flammable.

Some of the cloth covered original wiring looks awfully frayed. I am
guessing that it's not code to sleeve them with plastic shrink tubing but I
suspect the real fix is to replace the wire which would about quintuple the
price of this job.


Presumably, you have a basement and/or attic? I'd probably leave most of
the living area outlet and lighting circuits "as is". But, would seriously
consider redoing the kitchen/meal prep circuits. More capacity is usually
a good investment. Even if you don't upgrade the service, you might
find it convenient to be able to run an electric skillet AND the microwave
at the same time (by moving them to different circuits). Or, not having
to worry about tripping the breaker for the refrigerator (food spoilage)
because some other appliance happened to be on at the same time, etc.

You will probably also discover that your existing wiring is not up
to code (kitchens, bathrooms, garages and basements see lots of code
revisions -- 70 years is a LONG TIME in code terms!). Recall that
the code is there for YOUR safety, not just as an excuse to "make work"
for electricians!

Here, I've considered running a new branch circuit into the bedrooms
as I use one for my office (and have LOTS of electronic equipment in
there; so much that I am cautious about what I turn on at any given time!)

Would this be a good time to check the house's grounding system? How do you
measure the quality of the house's ground?


Always a good idea as this is what keeps you safe. Of course, if everything
is 2-wire, you're already bucking a headwind.

I'm assuming that he's going to know all of this stuff, but I'd like to be
as well-informed as I can about what problems we might be facing since I
will be assisting (mostly holding the flashlight or heading out to Home
Depot if we don't have everything we need).

I was also wondering if it would be prudent to place an externally mounted
shutoff for the whole house between the meter and the box? As it stands now
any work on the panel involves disconnecting the smart meter and a shut-off
would eliminate that step.


Dubious value. Unless you want to anticipate a whole-house genset in the
future!

Have fun. *Plan* on things going wrong/taking longer than expected/etc.

[You might also want to carefully investigate the panel chosen -- particularly
wrt the breakers! Will you be able to purchase replacements in the future
when these "new ones" fail? Or, will you be scouring the used building
supplies/surplus shops hoping to stumble across one that fits YOUR panel
20 years hence?]


  #11   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,538
Default Circuit box upgrade question(s)

On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 14:15:30 -0700, Don Y
wrote:

On 2/5/2016 2:31 AM, Texas Kingsnake wrote:
I am having my electrician buddy help me replace an old circuit box in a
fairly old house. Much of the wiring is old and cloth covered from the
40's.


Knob and tube?

What happens if one of the wires we are replacing breaks or is too
short to reach the breakers in the new panel?


This is what makes electrical work "interesting"! (not)

Do your homework and try to reshuffle the placement of the breakers
so you can attach each branch circuit to *a* breaker -- even if it
is not in the same physical position as previously.
Lots of attention to detail can also be a win when selecting a new
panel -- to minimize the distance the wires "need" to travel to
reach their corresponding breakers (don't forget about the neutral
connections, as well!)

A lot easier here in Canada where inspectors don't look ascanse at
panels mounted "sideways" I was able to replace my old Consolidated?
fuse panel with a new Square D QO panel without having to pull a
single staple or move a single wire - and had wire to spare by simply
laying the QO panel on it's side with the main to the left.

The electrician was a bit of a ditz and used the top neutral buss for
circuits that were on the bottom breakers - which made foe some fun
when I went to install an arc fault breaker in the bottom side of the
panel because "sparky" had cut the neutral to make it a neat fit to
the top buss. I called the inspector and he said no problem using a
Marrette 65 to tag a length of #12 or #14 copper to the aluminum
neutral to extend it to the bottom of the panel, so that's what I did.

Coulda skinned "sparky" for telling me I didn't need to upgrade to
GFIs and AFCIs with the panel upgrade when I was doing it for
"insurance inspection requirements" - and I asked him NUMEROUS times,
just to be sure.

So I had to upgrade it all after he was done when the inspector said
it was needed - meaning I needed to pull another permit and get
another inspection.
Thankfully the inspector was very understanding and he got me a "no
charge permit and inspection"
Do those broken wires have to
be spliced with wire nuts to a new piece of wire and then the splice section
mounted in a new junction box outside of the new panel? That could get ugly
very quickly but my limited knowledge of the NEC says splices have to be
with approved connectors and inside junction boxes.


Have you considered using one or more subpanels as a "cheat"?

Will he have the tools to determine if any of the wiring in the house has
decayed enough to present a fire hazard? Do you measure the resistance of
the wire from the panel to the eventual load?


The "wire" (i.e., "conductor") won't degrade/decay (when copper "rusts",
it forms a greenish oxide layer) but, rather, the insulation may be
a problem -- especially where it may have experienced mechanical wear
(like in the panel and terminal Jboxes -- lots of flexing as it is
connected/reconnected)

I know that one very long run
to the kitchen reads 105 volts with the microwave on when the voltage at the
breaker serving that run is at 119 volts. This is a run that has been used,
apparently, for years with a 20A breaker even though the wire apparently is
only 14 gauge. We will be correcting that by wiring it to a 15A breaker


frown Sure to get flagged by an inspection. For "efficiency", you
typically only want a 3-5% voltage drop under load. Wire is "sized" so
the heat generated in the conductor is safe for the insulation chosen
(the wire won't melt but the insulation will degrade).

SERIOUSLY consider running two new 20A countertop feeds into the kitchen.
Most of a home's AC is consumed in the kitchen. You'd also like to avail
yourself of GFCI and AFCI protections.

[I think we have 5 or 6 circuits feeding our kitchen, not counting the
oven/refrigerator/lighting]

And, chances are, you have all "two wire" circuits -- no earth/safety ground
available at your loads.

Also, he talked about "balancing the load" within the panel. Why is that
important?


The AC line feeding your residence is really two 120V lines wired one "atop"
the other. Sort of like putting two 120V batteries in series:

120V 120V
+XXXXXX- +XXXXXX-

A N B

The "neutral" wire is connected to the middle -- at 0V. So, you can think
of one "leg" as being +120V (i.e., at 'A') the other as being -120V (at 'B').

But, as this is AC and not DC, the 'A' point is really continuously varying
("alternating" as in "alternating current") between +120V and -120V while, at
the same time, the 'B' point is alternating between -120V and +120V!

[there's a bit of a lie, here, but not one that is material to the discussion]

For a 120V appliance, it "sees" the 'A' (or 'B'!) leg alternating between
+120 and -120 with the other wire connected to neutral (0V). Thus, 120V AC!
The load current flows "from" the 'A' (or 'B') to the load, through the
load and then returns on the neutral. (all of the electricity flowing OUT
the A -- or B -- ends up coming *back* on the neutral. A "closed loop")

For a 220V (240) appliance, it sees one leg alternating between +120 and -120
while the other leg is alternating between -120 and +120. So, there's
240V AC *across* the device -- and the neutral wire is not involved!

Because A and B are "opposites" (A is positive while B is negative and A is
negative while B is positive), the "neutral current" from an appliance fed
from the 'A' leg is "opposite" what the neutral current from an appliance
fed from the 'B' leg; one is "going" while the other is "coming".

As you bring the loads on the 'A' and 'B' legs into balance, the neutral
current from that 'A' loads cancels out the neutral current from the 'B'
loads thereby reducing the current flowing in *THE* neutral (from the
power company).

If you consider the "two batteries in series" example, above, you can
see that the electric utility would prefer that you "load" each battery
similarly; why include the second battery if folks are just going to
put EVERYTHING on the first??

[The batteries are really transformers -- technically, a *single* transformer
with a "tap" in the center. If you're only using one half of the transformer,
then all of the heat is generated in that "winding" while the other is just
taking up space, so to speak]

This may sound like a stupid question but why are the breakers staggered? I
thought the A hot coming in on the left fed all the breakers on the left and
the B hot of the right fed all the breakers on the right. Apparently not.
Why?


When you remove the panel (or, when it has had all of the breakers
removed), the reason will be obvious. : It's just easier to make it
that way!

Any other pointers on panel upgrades or sites where I could learn more about
the process? I've been watching a bunch of so-so YouTube videos, but they
don't seem to answer the questions I have.

I've already gone through the panel and marked down which wires go where by
shutting each breaker off in turn and making note of what outlets and lights
were no longer powered. My buddy said that's often the worst part of a
panel replacement.


Methinks he exaggerates! : It's just tedious, not really "bad".
I prepared a scale floorplan of this house and adorned it with notations
of each Jbox, circuit number, etc. just so I could KNOW where everything
went. I.e., which breaker controls power to the smoke detectors??

When you are done, be sure to walk through the house and verify you have
identified the breaker for EVERY outlet/switch -- to make sure you haven't
missed something (which you might want to *change* in the process!)

I.e., did you remember the outlet behind the refrigerator? For the garbage
disposal? Garage door opener? Front porch light? Dishwasher? etc.

I assume the wires have to be properly labeled as they
come off the old panel and get attached to the new one.


Yes. Otherwise, you will have the panel disconnected (no power in your house!)
while you run around trying to figure out what each wire does. Easier to
do this BEFORE you turn off the power (and inconvenience the occupant)

Would a Brother label printer do the job?


Pro'ly. You might find it difficult to get the label tape to stick to the
(cloth/asphalt) wires. As such, you might want to use a "flag" sort of
attachment (wrap label around wire and adhere it to *itself*).

Note that you probably want the power off on the panel if you're going
to be messing around with individual conductors. It only takes an
ohnosecond to cook yourself!

Would it pay to get the kind of labeling tape
that's actually heat shrink tubing?


No. That would require you to disconnect each wire before labeling.
I.e., you'd only be doing that when you'd shut off power to the panel
(and then you're back to the "inconvenience" issue, above).

Would it be code-worthy to label each
wire like that permanently?


No. Labels can be flammable.

Some of the cloth covered original wiring looks awfully frayed. I am
guessing that it's not code to sleeve them with plastic shrink tubing but I
suspect the real fix is to replace the wire which would about quintuple the
price of this job.


Presumably, you have a basement and/or attic? I'd probably leave most of
the living area outlet and lighting circuits "as is". But, would seriously
consider redoing the kitchen/meal prep circuits. More capacity is usually
a good investment. Even if you don't upgrade the service, you might
find it convenient to be able to run an electric skillet AND the microwave
at the same time (by moving them to different circuits). Or, not having
to worry about tripping the breaker for the refrigerator (food spoilage)
because some other appliance happened to be on at the same time, etc.

You will probably also discover that your existing wiring is not up
to code (kitchens, bathrooms, garages and basements see lots of code
revisions -- 70 years is a LONG TIME in code terms!). Recall that
the code is there for YOUR safety, not just as an excuse to "make work"
for electricians!

Here, I've considered running a new branch circuit into the bedrooms
as I use one for my office (and have LOTS of electronic equipment in
there; so much that I am cautious about what I turn on at any given time!)

Would this be a good time to check the house's grounding system? How do you
measure the quality of the house's ground?


Always a good idea as this is what keeps you safe. Of course, if everything
is 2-wire, you're already bucking a headwind.

I'm assuming that he's going to know all of this stuff, but I'd like to be
as well-informed as I can about what problems we might be facing since I
will be assisting (mostly holding the flashlight or heading out to Home
Depot if we don't have everything we need).

I was also wondering if it would be prudent to place an externally mounted
shutoff for the whole house between the meter and the box? As it stands now
any work on the panel involves disconnecting the smart meter and a shut-off
would eliminate that step.


Dubious value. Unless you want to anticipate a whole-house genset in the
future!

Have fun. *Plan* on things going wrong/taking longer than expected/etc.

[You might also want to carefully investigate the panel chosen -- particularly
wrt the breakers! Will you be able to purchase replacements in the future
when these "new ones" fail? Or, will you be scouring the used building
supplies/surplus shops hoping to stumble across one that fits YOUR panel
20 years hence?]


  #12   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,879
Default Circuit box upgrade question(s)

On 2/5/2016 2:39 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 14:15:30 -0700, Don Y


Do your homework and try to reshuffle the placement of the breakers
so you can attach each branch circuit to *a* breaker -- even if it
is not in the same physical position as previously.
Lots of attention to detail can also be a win when selecting a new
panel -- to minimize the distance the wires "need" to travel to
reach their corresponding breakers (don't forget about the neutral
connections, as well!)


A lot easier here in Canada where inspectors don't look ascanse at
panels mounted "sideways" I was able to replace my old Consolidated?
fuse panel with a new Square D QO panel without having to pull a
single staple or move a single wire - and had wire to spare by simply
laying the QO panel on it's side with the main to the left.

The electrician was a bit of a ditz and used the top neutral buss for
circuits that were on the bottom breakers - which made foe some fun
when I went to install an arc fault breaker in the bottom side of the
panel because "sparky" had cut the neutral to make it a neat fit to
the top buss. I called the inspector and he said no problem using a
Marrette 65 to tag a length of #12 or #14 copper to the aluminum
neutral to extend it to the bottom of the panel, so that's what I did.


Neighbor ran a new service a few years back (challenging as our utilities
are below grade -- had to retrench to the local tap, have the trench
inspected, etc.). He spent several days carefully mapping out the
NEW locations of each breaker in the replacement panel to ensure every
wire would "meet up with" an "appropriate" breaker in the new panel.
And, was *still* sweating bricks when the time came to disconnect the
old service and install the new!

[house is made of concrete block, no basement, no attic -- so what you
see is ALL you're gonna get!]

Coulda skinned "sparky" for telling me I didn't need to upgrade to
GFIs and AFCIs with the panel upgrade when I was doing it for
"insurance inspection requirements" - and I asked him NUMEROUS times,
just to be sure.


I long ago learned that asking THE SAME PERSON multiple times is
useless. Have to find another set of ears and hope they *agree*.
And, if/when they don't, you can at least confront the first set
with this "other opinion".

So I had to upgrade it all after he was done when the inspector said
it was needed - meaning I needed to pull another permit and get
another inspection.
Thankfully the inspector was very understanding and he got me a "no
charge permit and inspection"


In my neighbor's case, he was a cop so "professional courtesy" on
the part of the inspector. Lots of "visits" but I doubt he was
billed for more than one (to be "on the record").

[It pays to "know someone" :]

OTOH, didn't help him much when he snagged the gas main with his
back hoe while digging the trench! Gas company didn't care *what*
his day job entailed: "We got a problem, here, son..."
  #13   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,538
Default Circuit box upgrade question(s)

On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 14:52:18 -0700, Don Y
wrote:

On 2/5/2016 2:39 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 14:15:30 -0700, Don Y


Do your homework and try to reshuffle the placement of the breakers
so you can attach each branch circuit to *a* breaker -- even if it
is not in the same physical position as previously.
Lots of attention to detail can also be a win when selecting a new
panel -- to minimize the distance the wires "need" to travel to
reach their corresponding breakers (don't forget about the neutral
connections, as well!)


A lot easier here in Canada where inspectors don't look ascanse at
panels mounted "sideways" I was able to replace my old Consolidated?
fuse panel with a new Square D QO panel without having to pull a
single staple or move a single wire - and had wire to spare by simply
laying the QO panel on it's side with the main to the left.

The electrician was a bit of a ditz and used the top neutral buss for
circuits that were on the bottom breakers - which made foe some fun
when I went to install an arc fault breaker in the bottom side of the
panel because "sparky" had cut the neutral to make it a neat fit to
the top buss. I called the inspector and he said no problem using a
Marrette 65 to tag a length of #12 or #14 copper to the aluminum
neutral to extend it to the bottom of the panel, so that's what I did.


Neighbor ran a new service a few years back (challenging as our utilities
are below grade -- had to retrench to the local tap, have the trench
inspected, etc.). He spent several days carefully mapping out the
NEW locations of each breaker in the replacement panel to ensure every
wire would "meet up with" an "appropriate" breaker in the new panel.
And, was *still* sweating bricks when the time came to disconnect the
old service and install the new!

[house is made of concrete block, no basement, no attic -- so what you
see is ALL you're gonna get!]

Coulda skinned "sparky" for telling me I didn't need to upgrade to
GFIs and AFCIs with the panel upgrade when I was doing it for
"insurance inspection requirements" - and I asked him NUMEROUS times,
just to be sure.


I long ago learned that asking THE SAME PERSON multiple times is
useless. Have to find another set of ears and hope they *agree*.
And, if/when they don't, you can at least confront the first set
with this "other opinion".

So I had to upgrade it all after he was done when the inspector said
it was needed - meaning I needed to pull another permit and get
another inspection.
Thankfully the inspector was very understanding and he got me a "no
charge permit and inspection"


In my neighbor's case, he was a cop so "professional courtesy" on
the part of the inspector. Lots of "visits" but I doubt he was
billed for more than one (to be "on the record").

[It pays to "know someone" :]

OTOH, didn't help him much when he snagged the gas main with his
back hoe while digging the trench! Gas company didn't care *what*
his day job entailed: "We got a problem, here, son..."

That's why I've only got 125 amp service - I wasn't willing to do or
pay for the trenching required to go to 200.

The fact my Dad was an electrician and I knew how to do what needed to
be done helped in my case. When the inspector did the initial
insurance inspection he said other than needing the GFI protection
installed it was one of the cleanest inspections he'd ever had. -
which really helped.
He wasn't the same inspector who did the service inspection, but it
was the guy who did the service inspection that did the inspection on
my GFI installations. I took pictures of what I did and how - when he
came in I showed him the pictures and told him what I did, how and why
- and he took off one plate to take a look - and that was it.
  #14   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,879
Default Circuit box upgrade question(s)

On 2/5/2016 3:45 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 14:52:18 -0700, Don Y
wrote:

On 2/5/2016 2:39 PM,
wrote:
On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 14:15:30 -0700, Don Y


Do your homework and try to reshuffle the placement of the breakers
so you can attach each branch circuit to *a* breaker -- even if it
is not in the same physical position as previously.
Lots of attention to detail can also be a win when selecting a new
panel -- to minimize the distance the wires "need" to travel to
reach their corresponding breakers (don't forget about the neutral
connections, as well!)

A lot easier here in Canada where inspectors don't look ascanse at
panels mounted "sideways" I was able to replace my old Consolidated?
fuse panel with a new Square D QO panel without having to pull a
single staple or move a single wire - and had wire to spare by simply
laying the QO panel on it's side with the main to the left.

The electrician was a bit of a ditz and used the top neutral buss for
circuits that were on the bottom breakers - which made foe some fun
when I went to install an arc fault breaker in the bottom side of the
panel because "sparky" had cut the neutral to make it a neat fit to
the top buss. I called the inspector and he said no problem using a
Marrette 65 to tag a length of #12 or #14 copper to the aluminum
neutral to extend it to the bottom of the panel, so that's what I did.


Neighbor ran a new service a few years back (challenging as our utilities
are below grade -- had to retrench to the local tap, have the trench
inspected, etc.). He spent several days carefully mapping out the
NEW locations of each breaker in the replacement panel to ensure every
wire would "meet up with" an "appropriate" breaker in the new panel.
And, was *still* sweating bricks when the time came to disconnect the
old service and install the new!

[house is made of concrete block, no basement, no attic -- so what you
see is ALL you're gonna get!]

Coulda skinned "sparky" for telling me I didn't need to upgrade to
GFIs and AFCIs with the panel upgrade when I was doing it for
"insurance inspection requirements" - and I asked him NUMEROUS times,
just to be sure.


I long ago learned that asking THE SAME PERSON multiple times is
useless. Have to find another set of ears and hope they *agree*.
And, if/when they don't, you can at least confront the first set
with this "other opinion".

So I had to upgrade it all after he was done when the inspector said
it was needed - meaning I needed to pull another permit and get
another inspection.
Thankfully the inspector was very understanding and he got me a "no
charge permit and inspection"


In my neighbor's case, he was a cop so "professional courtesy" on
the part of the inspector. Lots of "visits" but I doubt he was
billed for more than one (to be "on the record").

[It pays to "know someone" :]

OTOH, didn't help him much when he snagged the gas main with his
back hoe while digging the trench! Gas company didn't care *what*
his day job entailed: "We got a problem, here, son..."

That's why I've only got 125 amp service - I wasn't willing to do or
pay for the trenching required to go to 200.


I looked into it when the neighbor did his. Then, thought carefully
about what are *actual* loads were and how we were managing them
and decided that consuming *more* energy wasn't the solution!

ACbrrr is our biggest load. New windows help a bit. Replacing
the unit periodically also gives us some efficiency gains.

(Electric) oven only sees use when baking. And, I tend to do that late
at night (lifestyle issues) which tends to be when cooling load is
lighter, anyways!

Beyond that, my "technology" is the only large, static load. And, I can
easily drop that by an order of magnitude every few years. So, end up
with more but consuming *less*.

Much less risk than taking on a major rewiring job!

The fact my Dad was an electrician and I knew how to do what needed to
be done helped in my case. When the inspector did the initial
insurance inspection he said other than needing the GFI protection
installed it was one of the cleanest inspections he'd ever had. -
which really helped.
He wasn't the same inspector who did the service inspection, but it
was the guy who did the service inspection that did the inspection on
my GFI installations. I took pictures of what I did and how - when he
came in I showed him the pictures and told him what I did, how and why
- and he took off one plate to take a look - and that was it.


  #15   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 14,141
Default Circuit box upgrade question(s)

On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 14:05:45 -0600, wrote:

On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 10:47:35 -0500,
wrote:


Another option is to use one of these mounted near the top of the
panel for your splices.
http://www.mcmelectronics.com/product/27-5986

I used to use things similar to that in the old electronics chassis.
Some appliances use similar things...

I'm not sure that would be code approved in the US for inside a breaker
panel ??????


It is a U/L listed splicing device and an elegant way to deal with a
dozen splices.


  #16   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 14,141
Default Circuit box upgrade question(s)


On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 14:15:30 -0700, Don Y
wrote:

I know that one very long run
to the kitchen reads 105 volts with the microwave on when the voltage at the
breaker serving that run is at 119 volts. This is a run that has been used,
apparently, for years with a 20A breaker even though the wire apparently is
only 14 gauge. We will be correcting that by wiring it to a 15A breaker


frown Sure to get flagged by an inspection. For "efficiency", you
typically only want a 3-5% voltage drop under load. Wire is "sized" so
the heat generated in the conductor is safe for the insulation chosen
(the wire won't melt but the insulation will degrade).


Maybe in a state that has amended an energy code into the NEC but that
3%/5% is just an informational note, not enforceable code.
  #18   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 14,141
Default Circuit box upgrade question(s)

On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 17:15:38 -0700, Don Y
wrote:

ACbrrr is our biggest load.


It is amusing that heat is our biggest load here. A 3 ton AC will end
up with 15kw of toaster wire heat, that might only be on 1 or 2 days a
year. I don't think mine has been on once in 3 years but it is still
in the load calc.
  #20   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,538
Default Circuit box upgrade question(s)

On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 19:36:32 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 14:05:45 -0600,
wrote:

On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 10:47:35 -0500,
wrote:


Another option is to use one of these mounted near the top of the
panel for your splices.
http://www.mcmelectronics.com/product/27-5986

I used to use things similar to that in the old electronics chassis.
Some appliances use similar things...

I'm not sure that would be code approved in the US for inside a breaker
panel ??????


It is a U/L listed splicing device and an elegant way to deal with a
dozen splices.

Listed barrier strips do work pretty well.


  #21   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 901
Default Circuit box upgrade question(s)

On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 09:19:01 -0500, "Texas Kingsnake"
wrote:

That makes sense. Thanks. I am worried about the old wiring though and
pulling new wire would be an enormous amount of work. As far as I can see,
the fraying is only bad where the sheathing has been stripped back. White
wires are now rather brownish-yellow.


You can buy white (and lots of other colors) electrical tape. It wont
hurt to put white tape on the neutrals. When I was working as an
electrician, I did that regularly on those old cloth wires. Besides
providing the color, it adds a little insulation to keep the cloth
intact. If you have any red wires in the panel, put red tape on them
too.


  #22   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,644
Default Circuit box upgrade question(s)

On Friday, February 5, 2016 at 4:47:12 AM UTC-5, Texas Kingsnake wrote:
I am having my electrician buddy help me replace an old circuit box in a
fairly old house. Much of the wiring is old and cloth covered from the
40's. What happens if one of the wires we are replacing breaks or is too
short to reach the breakers in the new panel? Do those broken wires have to
be spliced with wire nuts to a new piece of wire and then the splice section
mounted in a new junction box outside of the new panel? That could get ugly
very quickly but my limited knowledge of the NEC says splices have to be
with approved connectors and inside junction boxes.

Will he have the tools to determine if any of the wiring in the house has
decayed enough to present a fire hazard? Do you measure the resistance of
the wire from the panel to the eventual load? I know that one very long run
to the kitchen reads 105 volts with the microwave on when the voltage at the
breaker serving that run is at 119 volts. This is a run that has been used,
apparently, for years with a 20A breaker even though the wire apparently is
only 14 gauge. We will be correcting that by wiring it to a 15A breaker

Also, he talked about "balancing the load" within the panel. Why is that
important?

This may sound like a stupid question but why are the breakers staggered? I
thought the A hot coming in on the left fed all the breakers on the left and
the B hot of the right fed all the breakers on the right. Apparently not.
Why?

Any other pointers on panel upgrades or sites where I could learn more about
the process? I've been watching a bunch of so-so YouTube videos, but they
don't seem to answer the questions I have.

I've already gone through the panel and marked down which wires go where by
shutting each breaker off in turn and making note of what outlets and lights
were no longer powered. My buddy said that's often the worst part of a
panel replacement. I assume the wires have to be properly labeled as they
come off the old panel and get attached to the new one. Would a Brother
label printer do the job? Would it pay to get the kind of labeling tape
that's actually heat shrink tubing? Would it be code-worthy to label each
wire like that permanently?

Some of the cloth covered original wiring looks awfully frayed. I am
guessing that it's not code to sleeve them with plastic shrink tubing but I
suspect the real fix is to replace the wire which would about quintuple the
price of this job.

Would this be a good time to check the house's grounding system? How do you
measure the quality of the house's ground?

I'm assuming that he's going to know all of this stuff, but I'd like to be
as well-informed as I can about what problems we might be facing since I
will be assisting (mostly holding the flashlight or heading out to Home
Depot if we don't have everything we need).

I was also wondering if it would be prudent to place an externally mounted
shutoff for the whole house between the meter and the box? As it stands now
any work on the panel involves disconnecting the smart meter and a shut-off
would eliminate that step.

Thanks in advance for any advice . . .

TKS


you will have to upgrade the main entrance cable, meter can etc, to a heavier cable upgrading from 100 amps to 200 amps.

your project probably requires a permit. with 2 20 amps circuits to the kitchen, removal of all knob and tube wiring. its the kind most frequently covered by cloth.

basically you will need to upgrade to all current rules for a brand new home
  #23   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,644
Default Circuit box upgrade question(s)

On Friday, February 5, 2016 at 4:47:12 AM UTC-5, Texas Kingsnake wrote:
I am having my electrician buddy help me replace an old circuit box in a
fairly old house. Much of the wiring is old and cloth covered from the
40's. What happens if one of the wires we are replacing breaks or is too
short to reach the breakers in the new panel? Do those broken wires have to
be spliced with wire nuts to a new piece of wire and then the splice section
mounted in a new junction box outside of the new panel? That could get ugly
very quickly but my limited knowledge of the NEC says splices have to be
with approved connectors and inside junction boxes.

Will he have the tools to determine if any of the wiring in the house has
decayed enough to present a fire hazard? Do you measure the resistance of
the wire from the panel to the eventual load? I know that one very long run
to the kitchen reads 105 volts with the microwave on when the voltage at the
breaker serving that run is at 119 volts. This is a run that has been used,
apparently, for years with a 20A breaker even though the wire apparently is
only 14 gauge. We will be correcting that by wiring it to a 15A breaker

Also, he talked about "balancing the load" within the panel. Why is that
important?

This may sound like a stupid question but why are the breakers staggered? I
thought the A hot coming in on the left fed all the breakers on the left and
the B hot of the right fed all the breakers on the right. Apparently not.
Why?

Any other pointers on panel upgrades or sites where I could learn more about
the process? I've been watching a bunch of so-so YouTube videos, but they
don't seem to answer the questions I have.

I've already gone through the panel and marked down which wires go where by
shutting each breaker off in turn and making note of what outlets and lights
were no longer powered. My buddy said that's often the worst part of a
panel replacement. I assume the wires have to be properly labeled as they
come off the old panel and get attached to the new one. Would a Brother
label printer do the job? Would it pay to get the kind of labeling tape
that's actually heat shrink tubing? Would it be code-worthy to label each
wire like that permanently?

Some of the cloth covered original wiring looks awfully frayed. I am
guessing that it's not code to sleeve them with plastic shrink tubing but I
suspect the real fix is to replace the wire which would about quintuple the
price of this job.

Would this be a good time to check the house's grounding system? How do you
measure the quality of the house's ground?

I'm assuming that he's going to know all of this stuff, but I'd like to be
as well-informed as I can about what problems we might be facing since I
will be assisting (mostly holding the flashlight or heading out to Home
Depot if we don't have everything we need).

I was also wondering if it would be prudent to place an externally mounted
shutoff for the whole house between the meter and the box? As it stands now
any work on the panel involves disconnecting the smart meter and a shut-off
would eliminate that step.

Thanks in advance for any advice . . .

TKS


what the OP is using power wise can be meaningless.

at home sales time the buyers inspector will flag stuff, like no outlet for future garage door opener

the buyer can ding you sales price, and that costs you money
  #24   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,279
Default Circuit box upgrade question(s)

On Saturday, February 6, 2016 at 8:33:52 AM UTC-5, bob haller wrote:
On Friday, February 5, 2016 at 4:47:12 AM UTC-5, Texas Kingsnake wrote:
I am having my electrician buddy help me replace an old circuit box in a
fairly old house. Much of the wiring is old and cloth covered from the
40's. What happens if one of the wires we are replacing breaks or is too
short to reach the breakers in the new panel? Do those broken wires have to
be spliced with wire nuts to a new piece of wire and then the splice section
mounted in a new junction box outside of the new panel? That could get ugly
very quickly but my limited knowledge of the NEC says splices have to be
with approved connectors and inside junction boxes.

Will he have the tools to determine if any of the wiring in the house has
decayed enough to present a fire hazard? Do you measure the resistance of
the wire from the panel to the eventual load? I know that one very long run
to the kitchen reads 105 volts with the microwave on when the voltage at the
breaker serving that run is at 119 volts. This is a run that has been used,
apparently, for years with a 20A breaker even though the wire apparently is
only 14 gauge. We will be correcting that by wiring it to a 15A breaker

Also, he talked about "balancing the load" within the panel. Why is that
important?

This may sound like a stupid question but why are the breakers staggered? I
thought the A hot coming in on the left fed all the breakers on the left and
the B hot of the right fed all the breakers on the right. Apparently not.
Why?

Any other pointers on panel upgrades or sites where I could learn more about
the process? I've been watching a bunch of so-so YouTube videos, but they
don't seem to answer the questions I have.

I've already gone through the panel and marked down which wires go where by
shutting each breaker off in turn and making note of what outlets and lights
were no longer powered. My buddy said that's often the worst part of a
panel replacement. I assume the wires have to be properly labeled as they
come off the old panel and get attached to the new one. Would a Brother
label printer do the job? Would it pay to get the kind of labeling tape
that's actually heat shrink tubing? Would it be code-worthy to label each
wire like that permanently?

Some of the cloth covered original wiring looks awfully frayed. I am
guessing that it's not code to sleeve them with plastic shrink tubing but I
suspect the real fix is to replace the wire which would about quintuple the
price of this job.

Would this be a good time to check the house's grounding system? How do you
measure the quality of the house's ground?

I'm assuming that he's going to know all of this stuff, but I'd like to be
as well-informed as I can about what problems we might be facing since I
will be assisting (mostly holding the flashlight or heading out to Home
Depot if we don't have everything we need).

I was also wondering if it would be prudent to place an externally mounted
shutoff for the whole house between the meter and the box? As it stands now
any work on the panel involves disconnecting the smart meter and a shut-off
would eliminate that step.

Thanks in advance for any advice . . .

TKS


what the OP is using power wise can be meaningless.

at home sales time the buyers inspector will flag stuff, like no outlet for future garage door opener

the buyer can ding you sales price, and that costs you money


And changing a bunch of things like that which don't have to be changed, on the
theory that a future home inspector of unknown competence, will bitch about
it, doesn't cost money?

  #27   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,980
Default Circuit box upgrade question(s)

On 02/06/2016 09:54 AM, wrote:

[snip]

We'll be turning the AC on in another 6 weeks.


My wife had the AC on a few days ago


I remember I had my AC on for Christmas.

--
Mark Lloyd
http://notstupid.us/

"I wake up every morning and I wish I were dead, and so does Jim."
[Tammy Fae Bakker]
  #28   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 14,141
Default Circuit box upgrade question(s)

On Sat, 06 Feb 2016 09:12:27 -0700, Don Y
wrote:

On 2/6/2016 8:54 AM, wrote:


We'll be turning the AC on in another 6 weeks.


My wife had the AC on a few days ago


17 degrees a few nights ago. 80 tomorrow.


If it ever got much below 32 here I would move. 40 is unusual
  #32   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,526
Default Circuit box upgrade question(s)

On Friday, February 5, 2016 at 9:03:30 PM UTC-5, wrote:
On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 19:36:32 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 14:05:45 -0600,
wrote:

On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 10:47:35 -0500,
wrote:


Another option is to use one of these mounted near the top of the
panel for your splices.
http://www.mcmelectronics.com/product/27-5986

I used to use things similar to that in the old electronics chassis.
Some appliances use similar things...

I'm not sure that would be code approved in the US for inside a breaker
panel ??????


It is a U/L listed splicing device and an elegant way to deal with a
dozen splices.

Listed barrier strips do work pretty well.


I like them but never knew the US name for them. We always called it a chocolate block.
  #33   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,538
Default Circuit box upgrade question(s)

On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 16:34:39 -0500, Tekkie® wrote:

posted for all of us...



On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 09:19:01 -0500, "Texas Kingsnake"
wrote:

That makes sense. Thanks. I am worried about the old wiring though and
pulling new wire would be an enormous amount of work. As far as I can see,
the fraying is only bad where the sheathing has been stripped back. White
wires are now rather brownish-yellow.


You can buy white (and lots of other colors) electrical tape. It wont
hurt to put white tape on the neutrals. When I was working as an
electrician, I did that regularly on those old cloth wires. Besides
providing the color, it adds a little insulation to keep the cloth
intact. If you have any red wires in the panel, put red tape on them
too.


Does anyone believe this guy was an electrician?

Perhaps not a terribly GOOD one?
  #35   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 14,845
Default Circuit box upgrade question(s)

On Friday, February 5, 2016 at 5:45:51 PM UTC-5, wrote:

....a lot snipped...

The fact my Dad was an electrician and I knew how to do what needed to
be done helped in my case. When the inspector did the initial
insurance inspection he said other than needing the GFI protection
installed it was one of the cleanest inspections he'd ever had. -
which really helped.
He wasn't the same inspector who did the service inspection, but it
was the guy who did the service inspection that did the inspection on
my GFI installations. I took pictures of what I did and how - when he
came in I showed him the pictures and told him what I did, how and why
- and he took off one plate to take a look - and that was it.


Reminds me of when I built my deck. I had to dig about dozen post holes
4' deep to meet the frost line code. For safety sake, I covered each hole
with a scrap of wood as I went along.

It was raining the day the inspector came over. He slid one piece of
wood off with his foot and asked me "How deep is that hole?"

"At least 4 feet." I said.

He looked around the yard and said "And I'll bet there's a four foot hole
under every piece of wood, right?"

"Yep"

"You're good to go. Have a nice day."


  #36   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,644
Default Circuit box upgrade question(s)

On Saturday, February 6, 2016 at 9:24:14 AM UTC-5, trader_4 wrote:
On Saturday, February 6, 2016 at 8:33:52 AM UTC-5, bob haller wrote:
On Friday, February 5, 2016 at 4:47:12 AM UTC-5, Texas Kingsnake wrote:
I am having my electrician buddy help me replace an old circuit box in a
fairly old house. Much of the wiring is old and cloth covered from the
40's. What happens if one of the wires we are replacing breaks or is too
short to reach the breakers in the new panel? Do those broken wires have to
be spliced with wire nuts to a new piece of wire and then the splice section
mounted in a new junction box outside of the new panel? That could get ugly
very quickly but my limited knowledge of the NEC says splices have to be
with approved connectors and inside junction boxes.

Will he have the tools to determine if any of the wiring in the house has
decayed enough to present a fire hazard? Do you measure the resistance of
the wire from the panel to the eventual load? I know that one very long run
to the kitchen reads 105 volts with the microwave on when the voltage at the
breaker serving that run is at 119 volts. This is a run that has been used,
apparently, for years with a 20A breaker even though the wire apparently is
only 14 gauge. We will be correcting that by wiring it to a 15A breaker

Also, he talked about "balancing the load" within the panel. Why is that
important?

This may sound like a stupid question but why are the breakers staggered? I
thought the A hot coming in on the left fed all the breakers on the left and
the B hot of the right fed all the breakers on the right. Apparently not.
Why?

Any other pointers on panel upgrades or sites where I could learn more about
the process? I've been watching a bunch of so-so YouTube videos, but they
don't seem to answer the questions I have.

I've already gone through the panel and marked down which wires go where by
shutting each breaker off in turn and making note of what outlets and lights
were no longer powered. My buddy said that's often the worst part of a
panel replacement. I assume the wires have to be properly labeled as they
come off the old panel and get attached to the new one. Would a Brother
label printer do the job? Would it pay to get the kind of labeling tape
that's actually heat shrink tubing? Would it be code-worthy to label each
wire like that permanently?

Some of the cloth covered original wiring looks awfully frayed. I am
guessing that it's not code to sleeve them with plastic shrink tubing but I
suspect the real fix is to replace the wire which would about quintuple the
price of this job.

Would this be a good time to check the house's grounding system? How do you
measure the quality of the house's ground?

I'm assuming that he's going to know all of this stuff, but I'd like to be
as well-informed as I can about what problems we might be facing since I
will be assisting (mostly holding the flashlight or heading out to Home
Depot if we don't have everything we need).

I was also wondering if it would be prudent to place an externally mounted
shutoff for the whole house between the meter and the box? As it stands now
any work on the panel involves disconnecting the smart meter and a shut-off
would eliminate that step.

Thanks in advance for any advice . . .

TKS


what the OP is using power wise can be meaningless.

at home sales time the buyers inspector will flag stuff, like no outlet for future garage door opener

the buyer can ding you sales price, and that costs you money


And changing a bunch of things like that which don't have to be changed, on the
theory that a future home inspector of unknown competence, will bitch about
it, doesn't cost money?


my post, pasted

what the OP is using power wise can be meaningless.
at home sales time the buyers inspector will flag stuff, like no outlet for future garage door opener
he buyer can ding you sales price, and that costs you money.

my point is this. sounds like your clothe covered wiring is likely K&T.

generally not grounded, clothe covered and is not to be insulated around. usually 14 gauge wire but overfused with 20 amp or even 30 amp fuses.

kinda sounds like your home.

you probably need a complete rewire. which is a ton of work. but your original wiring is 70 years old....

anything else you have thats 70 years old?

your vehicle? how about your washer dryer, fridge or stove ??

its easier and cheaper to do it all at once, do it once, do it right, then relax.

now lets assume you have lived in your home for 50 years.. take that times 100 bucks a year.

do you see my point? just face facts, and do the job right.

oh and your new panel buy one with the most breaker slots available, and choose one that allows safe code complaint back feeding.......

might be useful someday
  #37   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 901
Default Circuit box upgrade question(s)

On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 17:50:43 -0800 (PST), bob haller
wrote:

my point is this. sounds like your clothe covered wiring is likely K&T.

generally not grounded, clothe covered and is not to be insulated around.
usually 14 gauge wire but overfused with 20 amp or even 30 amp fuses.

kinda sounds like your home.

you probably need a complete rewire. which is a ton of work. but your
original wiring is 70 years old....

anything else you have thats 70 years old?


If I recall the OPs original message, the wiring is from the 1950s. K&T
was no longer used in the 50's. But the BX cable from that era had cloth
covered wire, as well as wire run in conduit, which was common in the
50s (conduit in the basement, BX in the walls).

K&T was actually a very safe wiring method. The wires were separated so
they could not easily touch each other and the porcelain insulators were
a good way to keep wire from direct contact with flammables such as
wood. Also connections were all soldered back them.
But the drawbacks were a lack of grounding and the fact that the old
fuse boxes could use up to a 30A fuse on #14 wire.



  #38   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 14,845
Default Circuit box upgrade question(s)

On Saturday, February 6, 2016 at 9:16:04 PM UTC-5, wrote:
On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 17:50:43 -0800 (PST), bob haller
wrote:

my point is this. sounds like your clothe covered wiring is likely K&T.

generally not grounded, clothe covered and is not to be insulated around.
usually 14 gauge wire but overfused with 20 amp or even 30 amp fuses.

kinda sounds like your home.

you probably need a complete rewire. which is a ton of work. but your
original wiring is 70 years old....

anything else you have thats 70 years old?


If I recall the OPs original message, the wiring is from the 1950s. K&T
was no longer used in the 50's. But the BX cable from that era had cloth
covered wire, as well as wire run in conduit, which was common in the
50s (conduit in the basement, BX in the walls).

K&T was actually a very safe wiring method. The wires were separated so
they could not easily touch each other and the porcelain insulators were
a good way to keep wire from direct contact with flammables such as
wood. Also connections were all soldered back them.
But the drawbacks were a lack of grounding and the fact that the old
fuse boxes could use up to a 30A fuse on #14 wire.


A 30A fuse or a penny. ;-)

However, the ability to use a 30A fuses in a fuse box wasn't a drawback
of K&T wiring, it was a drawback of fuse boxes. In fact, it was a drawback
of fuse boxes that remained long after K&T wiring was abandoned.

In fact, there is nothing to stop the use of a overrated breaker today. That
drawback is unrelated to the type of wiring used.
  #40   Report Post  
Posted to alt.home.repair
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 901
Default Circuit box upgrade question(s)

On Sun, 07 Feb 2016 01:18:44 -0500, wrote:

anything else you have thats 70 years old?


If I recall the OPs original message, the wiring is from the 1950s. K&T
was no longer used in the 50's. But the BX cable from that era had cloth
covered wire, as well as wire run in conduit, which was common in the
50s (conduit in the basement, BX in the walls).

K&T was actually a very safe wiring method. The wires were separated so
they could not easily touch each other and the porcelain insulators were
a good way to keep wire from direct contact with flammables such as
wood. Also connections were all soldered back them.
But the drawbacks were a lack of grounding and the fact that the old
fuse boxes could use up to a 30A fuse on #14 wire.



By the 50s I would expect to see the asphalt and paper covered Romex
with TW insulation on the conductor. By then BX or AC cable would have
TW insulation too. I assumed he was talking about the jacket


My parents house was built in 1951. It had all BX with the cloth
insulated wire inside the metal spiral (in the walls). The basement had
steel EMT conduit, with a thick plastic coated wire inside which was
probably TW. I worked on several homes in the neighborhood, all which
were built from 50 to 55. All were wired the same. Romex was not allowed
in the city at that time, but I did see some of it in rural areas
nearby. It was the asphalt/cloth outer jacket stuff, with TW coated
conductors.

In the older part of the city. The wires were all cloth coated wire.
Much was K&T, some was the original (Thick) BX. The basement conduit was
a threaded steel pipe, more like water pipe, than EMT. (Which was a pain
in the ass if it needed to be modified in any way).

But I suppose it was regional. Wiring seems a lot more consistent today.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why should I upgrade from fuses to circuit breakers? (and spend $1000-$1500) [email protected] Home Repair 41 January 6th 07 02:18 PM
Entryphone Upgrade Question Fred Finisterre UK diy 2 June 10th 06 11:43 AM
Yet another furnace upgrade question... Gerry Gardiner Home Repair 8 February 2nd 06 09:08 PM
Circuit Breaker Upgrade? David Martel Home Repair 8 September 24th 05 10:21 AM
Zenith TV upgrade question . . Electronics Repair 4 August 1st 05 03:47 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 DIYbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about DIY & home improvement"