On 7/31/15 9:01 AM, Stormin Mormon wrote:
Which leads into a point I've made several times
over the years. Our welfare and benefits laws are
promoting this behavior.

Daniel Patrick Moynihan was right, years ago.

The only way to seriously curtail this "behavior" is to stop providing
support to the children of unmarried welfare women.

However, to do so will result (literally) in young children starving.
But that's the only way. Welfare women must know that their babies will
whither and die if they insist on bearing them without any means of
supporting them.

After enough infants and children die, the bad behavior will decline,
and illegitimacy levels should return to where they were some 70 years ago.

Are you prepared for this?

On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 3:43:44 PM UTC-5, John Albert wrote:
On 7/31/15 9:01 AM, Stormin Mormon wrote:
Which leads into a point I've made several times
over the years. Our welfare and benefits laws are
promoting this behavior.

Daniel Patrick Moynihan was right, years ago.

The only way to seriously curtail this "behavior" is to stop providing
support to the children of unmarried welfare women.

However, to do so will result (literally) in young children starving.
But that's the only way. Welfare women must know that their babies will
whither and die if they insist on bearing them without any means of
supporting them.

After enough infants and children die, the bad behavior will decline,
and illegitimacy levels should return to where they were some 70 years ago.

Are you prepared for this?

Letting them die is unnecessary, give welfare babies to Planned Parenthood and let them part them out. ^_^

[8~{} Uncle Evil Monster

John Albert wrote:
I'll guess that if Mr. Palmer wanted recognition and braggin' rights
about his safari, he's got 'em now:

Hi! I'm Walt Palmer! I'm the guy who killed Cecil the Lion!

Is he going onto World Book of Record?

On 7/31/2015 4:36 PM, Uncle Monster wrote:
On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 2:45:47 PM UTC-5, Frank wrote:
On 7/31/2015 9:05 AM, (PeteCresswell) wrote:
Per Frank:
Daughter-in-law at age 43 was at high risk of preeclampsia and had
frequent sonograms a week apart towards the end. Maybe two months
before she was born we got a sonogram of her sucking her thumb. We fell
in love with that little girl far before she was born.

Maybe abortion up to the end of the first trimester is OK with some but
I would certainly like to see it a crime there-after.

That seems like a good example of why the Right To Life people could
make some progress towards their goals by lightening up on the
Fertilized Egg = Human Being thing and concentrating on rolling back the
late-term abortion limit.

Even I - who has a pretty high regard for science and understands that
qualified people have opined that the nervous system has not developed
sufficiently by the late term limit - could go for rolling it back. A
22-week foetus simply looks too much like a baby to not *be* one in my
mind.


We have a framed picture of the 2 month sonogram which says "Love at
first sight". She has the fetal look but definite baby shaped head.
Son and daughter-in-law had taken us out to dinner where they gave it to
me as a present. Dark restaurant, I could not make it out, but in
daylight it clearly show a baby.

As I wrote before, I might be able to live with abortion in the first
trimester to account for women too dumb to know they were pregnant but
after that, I say ban it.

Children are a precious part of humanity and not a resource to be squandered. I'm really bothered by those people who'd

force a woman to have a child then care not what happens to the child
after it's born as much as I am by those who

think an unborn child is expendable. It's tragic that so many
couples want children and

can't get pregnant but a lot of those who can bear children, don't want
them. It bothers me, does it bother you? o_O

[8~{} Uncle Vexed Monster


It does. I've had friends that could not have children and had to go
out of the country to adopt one.

I joked to my wife one day on returning from a walk in the park that I
saw a Chinese baby with a Chinese mother. Now-a-days you see Chinese
babies with non-Chinese mothers.

On 7/31/2015 4:43 PM, John Albert wrote:
On 7/31/15 9:01 AM, Stormin Mormon wrote:
Which leads into a point I've made several times
over the years. Our welfare and benefits laws are
promoting this behavior.

Daniel Patrick Moynihan was right, years ago.

The only way to seriously curtail this "behavior" is to stop providing
support to the children of unmarried welfare women.

However, to do so will result (literally) in young children starving.
But that's the only way. Welfare women must know that their babies will
whither and die if they insist on bearing them without any means of
supporting them.

After enough infants and children die, the bad behavior will decline,
and illegitimacy levels should return to where they were some 70 years ago.

Are you prepared for this?

Actually, I must disagree. I don't think that limiting
aid to two kids (have more? No increase in funding)
will cause starving kids. I'd like to see same money for
however many kids (some what similar to what you said).

I'd like to see the welfare rules changed, so that fathers
in the home get paid morethan absent fathers.

I'd like to see the welfare rules changed so that when
a person gets a job, s/he keeps the money with only a
slight reduction in government aid. Work needs to be
rewarded, not penalized.

With the couple changes I suggest, over the generations
we'll see less crime, more well adjusted kids, and less
popping out of baby every three years (remove the
incentive).

I doubt we'll see starving children in conservative
parts of the country. Maybe in leftist areas.

--
..
Christopher A. Young
learn more about Jesus
.. www.lds.org
..
..

On 7/31/2015 5:14 PM, Uncle Monster wrote:
On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 3:43:44 PM UTC-5, John Albert wrote:

After enough infants and children die, the bad behavior will decline,
and illegitimacy levels should return to where they were some 70 years ago.

Are you prepared for this?

Letting them die is unnecessary, give welfare babies to Planned Parenthood and let them part them out. ^_^

[8~{} Uncle Evil Monster


Black lives matter. Need more body parts to keep
blacks alive, and other great ideas by Al Sharpton?

--
..
Christopher A. Young
learn more about Jesus
.. www.lds.org
..
..

On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 5:40:05 PM UTC-5, Frank wrote:
On 7/31/2015 4:36 PM, Uncle Monster wrote:
On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 2:45:47 PM UTC-5, Frank wrote:
On 7/31/2015 9:05 AM, (PeteCresswell) wrote:
Per Frank:
Daughter-in-law at age 43 was at high risk of preeclampsia and had
frequent sonograms a week apart towards the end. Maybe two months
before she was born we got a sonogram of her sucking her thumb. We fell
in love with that little girl far before she was born.

Maybe abortion up to the end of the first trimester is OK with some but
I would certainly like to see it a crime there-after.

That seems like a good example of why the Right To Life people could
make some progress towards their goals by lightening up on the
Fertilized Egg = Human Being thing and concentrating on rolling back the
late-term abortion limit.

Even I - who has a pretty high regard for science and understands that
qualified people have opined that the nervous system has not developed
sufficiently by the late term limit - could go for rolling it back. A
22-week foetus simply looks too much like a baby to not *be* one in my
mind.


We have a framed picture of the 2 month sonogram which says "Love at
first sight". She has the fetal look but definite baby shaped head.
Son and daughter-in-law had taken us out to dinner where they gave it to
me as a present. Dark restaurant, I could not make it out, but in
daylight it clearly show a baby.

As I wrote before, I might be able to live with abortion in the first
trimester to account for women too dumb to know they were pregnant but
after that, I say ban it.

Children are a precious part of humanity and not a resource to be squandered. I'm really bothered by those people who'd

force a woman to have a child then care not what happens to the child
after it's born as much as I am by those who

think an unborn child is expendable. It's tragic that so many
couples want children and

can't get pregnant but a lot of those who can bear children, don't want
them. It bothers me, does it bother you? o_O

[8~{} Uncle Vexed Monster


It does. I've had friends that could not have children and had to go
out of the country to adopt one.

I joked to my wife one day on returning from a walk in the park that I
saw a Chinese baby with a Chinese mother. Now-a-days you see Chinese
babies with non-Chinese mothers.

I have no children of my own but I get adopted by little kids all the time. It saddens me that so many LIVING children are literally thrown away. If I were a billionaire, I'd adopt hundreds of them and see that they were given the best possible shot at life. I came from a large family and I don't know how my parents did it but it was a different time and people could afford more than one child in those days. Large families are darn near impossible for middle class Americans who are exactly the people who should be having a lot of children. o_O

[8~{} Uncle Childless Monster

On 7/31/2015 10:01 PM, Uncle Monster wrote:
On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 5:40:05 PM UTC-5, Frank wrote:
I joked to my wife one day on returning from a walk in the park that I
saw a Chinese baby with a Chinese mother. Now-a-days you see Chinese
babies with non-Chinese mothers.

I have no children of my own but I get adopted by
little kids all the time. It saddens me that so many
LIVING children are literally thrown away. If I were
a billionaire, I'd adopt hundreds of them and see
that they were given the best possible shot at life.
I came from a large family and I don't know how my
parents did it but it was a different time and people
could afford more than one child in those days. Large
families are darn near impossible for middle class
Americans who are exactly the people who should be
having a lot of children. o_O

[8~{} Uncle Childless Monster


I've also noticed that: Middle class folks practice
zero population growth, while Mexicans and Muslims
and welfare leeches have a huge family.

--
..
Christopher A. Young
learn more about Jesus
.. www.lds.org
..
..

In article , Frank "frank
wrote:

I joked to my wife one day on returning from a walk in the park that I
saw a Chinese baby with a Chinese mother. Now-a-days you see Chinese
babies with non-Chinese mothers.
Maybe. You really can't, now-a-days completely rule out a Chinese baby
with a Chinese nanny./
--
³Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive,
but what they conceal is vital.²
‹ Aaron Levenstein

Frank "frank wrote in :

As far as "black lives matter" apparently abortion among blacks is
highest.

That's bad?

On 8/1/2015 8:30 AM, Zak W wrote:
Frank "frank wrote in :

As far as "black lives matter" apparently abortion among blacks is
highest.

That's bad?


Liberals loosing potential voters.

Same with Libs supporting LGBT.

They eat their young.

On 7/31/2015 6:15 PM, Tony Hwang wrote:
John Albert wrote:
I'll guess that if Mr. Palmer wanted recognition and braggin' rights
about his safari, he's got 'em now:

Hi! I'm Walt Palmer! I'm the guy who killed Cecil the Lion!

Is he going onto World Book of Record?

–„︻̷̿”»Ì¿•�”�一

On Saturday, August 1, 2015 at 6:56:21 AM UTC-5, Stormin Mormon wrote:
On 7/31/2015 10:01 PM, Uncle Monster wrote:
On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 5:40:05 PM UTC-5, Frank wrote:
I joked to my wife one day on returning from a walk in the park that I
saw a Chinese baby with a Chinese mother. Now-a-days you see Chinese
babies with non-Chinese mothers.

I have no children of my own but I get adopted by
little kids all the time. It saddens me that so many
LIVING children are literally thrown away. If I were
a billionaire, I'd adopt hundreds of them and see
that they were given the best possible shot at life.
I came from a large family and I don't know how my
parents did it but it was a different time and people
could afford more than one child in those days. Large
families are darn near impossible for middle class
Americans who are exactly the people who should be
having a lot of children. o_O

[8~{} Uncle Childless Monster


I've also noticed that: Middle class folks practice
zero population growth, while Mexicans and Muslims
and welfare leeches have a huge family.
--
.

I believe that's what I wrote but in a more "sensitive" PC way. It's the Muslims that are the greatest worry because one of the big Moo Moo's or WTF they're called said something to the effect,"We will conquer Europe with the wombs of our women." Liberal La La Land is allowing Muslims to overrun their countries and take over. Sweden is already lost, other European countries are next and our current Executive Branch is trying to encourage the same nonsense in The United States. If you listen to what some of the Islamic radicals are saying, their goal is to breed like flies and patiently overrun the rest of the world without the sane people realizing what's happening before it's too late. o_O

[8~{} Uncle Terrorist Monster

Frank" "frank wrote:

?????????

That's very good ASCII art!

On 8/1/2015 2:22 PM, dadiOH wrote:
Frank" "frank wrote:

?????????

That's very good ASCII art!




On TV this am I heard Apple folks were complaining about a new emoticon
with a gun. I'm not an Apple person but had recalled bookmarking this site:

http://emot.es/

This is cool too:

̿̿ ̿̿ ̿̿ ̿'̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)=ε/̵͇̿̿/̿̿ ̿ ̿̿ ̿̿ ̿̿

On Saturday, August 1, 2015 at 6:05:25 PM UTC-5, Frank wrote:
On 8/1/2015 2:22 PM, dadiOH wrote:
Frank" "frank wrote:

?????????

That's very good ASCII art!

On TV this am I heard Apple folks were complaining about a new emoticon
with a gun. I'm not an Apple person but had recalled bookmarking this site:

http://emot.es/

This is cool too:

̿̿ ̿̿ ̿̿ ̿'̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)=ε/̵͇̿̿/̿̿ ̿ ̿̿ ̿̿ ̿̿


I've been playing around with some of them but the emoticons don't always survive the trip through Usenet. ^_^

https://textfac.es/

http://unicodeemoticons.com/

\ (€¢—¡€¢) /

[8~{} Uncle Emoting Monster

On Saturday, August 1, 2015 at 6:05:25 PM UTC-5, Frank wrote:

On 8/1/2015 2:22 PM, dadiOH wrote:

Frank" "frank wrote:


?????????


That's very good ASCII art!





On TV this am I heard Apple folks were complaining about a new emoticon
with a gun. I'm not an Apple person but had recalled bookmarking this site:

http://emot.es/

This is cool too:

̿̿ ̿̿ ̿̿ ̿'̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)=ε/̵͇̿̿/̿̿ ̿ ̿̿ ̿̿ ̿̿


•*ˆ©•®( Í¡š† ͜ʖ Í¡š†)•*ˆ©•® And I like it too!

On Sat, 1 Aug 2015 19:05:20 -0400, Frank "frank wrote:

On TV this am I heard Apple folks were complaining about a new emoticon
with a gun. I'm not an Apple person but had recalled bookmarking this site:

http://emot.es/

Emoticons are for inarticulate ****ers.

On Saturday, August 1, 2015 at 6:50:29 PM UTC-5, Oren wrote:
On Sat, 1 Aug 2015 19:05:20 -0400, Frank "frank wrote:

On TV this am I heard Apple folks were complaining about a new emoticon
with a gun. I'm not an Apple person but had recalled bookmarking this site:

http://emot.es/

Emoticons are for inarticulate ****ers.

Oh yea! Take that text snob! ᕦ(ò_óˇ)ᕤ ლ(à²*益à²*ლ) (ง Í*° ÍŸÙ„Íœ ͡°)ง á•™(‡€€¸†¼€¶)á•— \ (€¢—¡€¢) /

[8~{} Uncle Text Monster

On 8/1/2015 6:11 PM, bob_villa wrote:
On Saturday, August 1, 2015 at 6:05:25 PM UTC-5, Frank wrote:
On 8/1/2015 2:22 PM, dadiOH wrote:
Frank" "frank wrote:

?????????

That's very good ASCII art!




On TV this am I heard Apple folks were complaining about a new emoticon
with a gun. I'm not an Apple person but had recalled bookmarking this site:

http://emot.es/

This is cool too:

̿̿ ̿̿ ̿̿ ̿'̿'\̵͇̿̿\з=( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)=ε/̵͇̿̿/̿̿ ̿ ̿̿ ̿̿ ̿̿

•*ˆ©•®( Í¡š† ͜ʖ Í¡š†)•*ˆ©•® And I like it too!


Nice smile you got there.

--
Maggie