Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) and Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA). The deal increases discretionary domestic spending to over $1 trillion a year, by eliminating most the the sequester cuts. The deal pays for the spending hike through increased user fees and spending cuts, half of which occur a decade from now. One of the near-term spending cuts, however, is to reduce pension benefits for current veterans and active-duty military.

The Ryan-Murray budget deal hikes federal spending by $65 billion over the next two years. This spending is "paid for" by an increase in user fees, budget cuts in 2022 and 2023 and small reductions in current spending. One of these reductions is in pension benefits to veterans younger than 62. The budget deal would reduce the yearly cost-of-living adjustments for these military veterans. It would even impact those veterans who were forced to retire due to injuries sustained in the service of our country. As my colleague Matt Boyle reported,House GOP leaders knew that the pension changes would impact vets.

On Thursday, December 19, 2013 9:10:58 AM UTC-8, Daring Dufas : Hypocrite gay TeaBillie on welfare wrote:
Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) and Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA). The deal increases discretionary domestic spending to over $1 trillion a year, by eliminating most the the sequester cuts. The deal pays for the spending hike through increased user fees and spending cuts, half of which occur a decade from now. One of the near-term spending cuts, however, is to reduce pension benefits for current veterans and active-duty military.



The Ryan-Murray budget deal hikes federal spending by $65 billion over the next two years. This spending is "paid for" by an increase in user fees, budget cuts in 2022 and 2023 and small reductions in current spending. One of these reductions is in pension benefits to veterans younger than 62. The budget deal would reduce the yearly cost-of-living adjustments for these military veterans. It would even impact those veterans who were forced to retire due to injuries sustained in the service of our country. As my colleague Matt Boyle reported,House GOP leaders knew that the pension changes would impact vets.

The difference between a dog and a cat is, you can kick a dog and he’ll keep coming back and licking your hand but a cat will never come near you again.

In article ,
Daring Dufas : Hypocrite gay TeaBillie on welfare wrote:
Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) and Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA). The deal increases disc=
retionary domestic spending to over $1 trillion a year, by eliminating most=
the the sequester cuts. The deal pays for the spending hike through increa=
sed user fees and spending cuts, half of which occur a decade from now. One=
of the near-term spending cuts, however, is to reduce pension benefits for=
current veterans and active-duty military.

The Ryan-Murray budget deal hikes federal spending by $65 billion over the =
next two years. This spending is "paid for" by an increase in user fees, bu=
dget cuts in 2022 and 2023 and small reductions in current spending. One of=
these reductions is in pension benefits to veterans younger than 62. The b=
udget deal would reduce the yearly cost-of-living adjustments for these mil=
itary veterans. It would even impact those veterans who were forced to reti=
re due to injuries sustained in the service of our country. As my colleague=
Matt Boyle reported,House GOP leaders knew that the pension changes would =
impact vets.

Although I think it's a crappy thing for the government to do, I don't
see how "veterans younger than 62" can be considered "old", especially
in this newsgroup.

If I were Tyrant of the United States, I'd see to it that serving
military personnel and veterans were generously rewarded for their
service.

Cindy Hamilton
--

On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 09:15:56 -0800 (PST),
wrote:



The difference between a dog and a cat is, you can kick a dog and he=92ll k=
eep coming back and licking your hand

Are you sure about that?

How about the saying, Even a dog knows the difference between being
kicked and being tripped on.


but a cat will never come near you ag=
ain.

On 12/19/2013 11:50 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
In article ,
Daring Dufas : Hypocrite gay TeaBillie on welfare wrote:
Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) and Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA). The deal increases disc=
retionary domestic spending to over $1 trillion a year, by eliminating most=
the the sequester cuts. The deal pays for the spending hike through increa=
sed user fees and spending cuts, half of which occur a decade from now. One=
of the near-term spending cuts, however, is to reduce pension benefits for=
current veterans and active-duty military.

The Ryan-Murray budget deal hikes federal spending by $65 billion over the =
next two years. This spending is "paid for" by an increase in user fees, bu=
dget cuts in 2022 and 2023 and small reductions in current spending. One of=
these reductions is in pension benefits to veterans younger than 62. The b=
udget deal would reduce the yearly cost-of-living adjustments for these mil=
itary veterans. It would even impact those veterans who were forced to reti=
re due to injuries sustained in the service of our country. As my colleague=
Matt Boyle reported,House GOP leaders knew that the pension changes would =
impact vets.

Although I think it's a crappy thing for the government to do, I don't
see how "veterans younger than 62" can be considered "old", especially
in this newsgroup.

If I were Tyrant of the United States, I'd see to it that serving
military personnel and veterans were generously rewarded for their
service.

Cindy Hamilton

Not only is it a crappy thing to do but several studies conducted in the
late 1970's concluded that military retirees bodies were chronologically
advanced by 12-15 years over their peers who did not serve within the
military. Methinks that one of the requirements for being allowed to
run for a government office is a valid DD-214 showing honorable active
service in the US military.

Those veterans need to get off the govt tit. If they voted for the Mormon they deserve it.

On 12/19/2013 2:14 PM, micky wrote:
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 09:15:56 -0800 (PST),
wrote:



The difference between a dog and a cat is, you can kick a dog and he=92ll k=
eep coming back and licking your hand

Are you sure about that?

How about the saying, Even a dog knows the difference between being
kicked and being tripped on.


but a cat will never come near you ag=
ain.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-oVhu2fu20

On Thursday, December 19, 2013 12:14:32 PM UTC-8, micky wrote:
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 09:15:56 -0800 (PST),

wrote:







The difference between a dog and a cat is, you can kick a dog and he=92ll k=

eep coming back and licking your hand



Are you sure about that?



How about the saying, Even a dog knows the difference between being

kicked and being tripped on.





but a cat will never come near you ag=

ain.

The trouble with dogs is that they always assume they’re being tripped on..

Irreverent Maximus wrote:
On 12/19/2013 2:14 PM, micky wrote:
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 09:15:56 -0800 (PST),
wrote:



The difference between a dog and a cat is, you can kick a dog and
he=92ll k=
eep coming back and licking your hand

Are you sure about that?

How about the saying, Even a dog knows the difference between being
kicked and being tripped on.


but a cat will never come near you ag=
ain.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-oVhu2fu20
Hui,
I wonder why word "white" is in there?
You mean dog is white or cat is white?

On 12/19/2013 5:10 PM, NamPhong wrote:
snip...
Not only is it a crappy thing to do but several studies conducted in the
late 1970's concluded that military retirees bodies were chronologically
advanced by 12-15 years over their peers who did not serve within the
military. Methinks that one of the requirements for being allowed to run
for a government office is a valid DD-214 showing honorable active service
in the US military.

"Honorable?" Doesn't that automatically eliminate anybody who would
consider running for congress? Once you've stooped so low as to even
consider it, any honor you might have once possessed has certainly trickled
away and been replaced by power-mad avarice.

On 12-21-2013, 16:51, BenignBodger wrote:
"Honorable?" Doesn't that automatically eliminate anybody who would
consider running for congress? Once you've stooped so low as to even
consider it, any honor you might have once possessed has certainly
trickled away and been replaced by power-mad avarice.

I was thinking that if every Congressman was ex-military, it would no
longer be seen as a dishonorable job. But then I got to thinking about
some of the ones who ARE ex-military, ....

Plus, if all Congressmen were ex-military, we might soon have a country
run BY the military.

And that's not sour grapes--I have an honorable discharge, and I spent
thirteen years in the Navy. (Technically sixteen, but I was inactive
the last three.)

--
Wes Groleau

Words of the Wild Wes
http://Ideas.Lang-Learn.us/WWW

On 12/23/2013 1:32 AM, Wes Groleau wrote:
On 12-21-2013, 16:51, BenignBodger wrote:
"Honorable?" Doesn't that automatically eliminate anybody who
would consider running for congress? Once you've stooped so low as
to even consider it, any honor you might have once possessed has
certainly trickled away and been replaced by power-mad avarice.

I was thinking that if every Congressman was ex-military, it would no
longer be seen as a dishonorable job. But then I got to thinking
about some of the ones who ARE ex-military, ....

Plus, if all Congressmen were ex-military, we might soon have a
country run BY the military.

And that's not sour grapes--I have an honorable discharge, and I
spent thirteen years in the Navy. (Technically sixteen, but I was
inactive the last three.)


Hey sailor, looking for a good time? ^_^

TDD

You want to suck his cock - gay boy?

On 12/23/2013 5:50 AM, Daring Dufas A Sock Of Killer Loon wrote:
You want to suck his cock - gay boy?

Of course not Killer Loon, I don't perform your depraved sexual
acts or your abuse of male chickens. I'm a pimp, you silly git. ^_^

TDD

On 12/23/2013 4:57 AM, The Daring Dufas wrote:
On 12/23/2013 1:32 AM, Wes Groleau wrote:

And that's not sour grapes--I have an honorable discharge, and I
spent thirteen years in the Navy. (Technically sixteen, but I was
inactive the last three.)


Hey sailor, looking for a good time? ^_^

TDD

Careful! Navy guys have a reputation for......

--
..
Christopher A. Young
Learn about Jesus
www.lds.org
..

I haven't researched it. But, I suspect it was the
liberal Democrats who cut benefits tot he vets.

--
..
Christopher A. Young
Learn about Jesus
www.lds.org
..