On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 01:29:23 -0800 (PST), harry
wrote:

On Jan 21, 4:42*am, Oren wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 01:14:19 -0800 (PST), harry
wrote:





On Jan 19, 4:43*pm, Oren wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:07:21 -0800 (PST), harry
wrote:

On Jan 18, 9:45*pm, "Attila.Iskander"
wrote:
"Oren" wrote in message

. ..

On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:22:28 -0800 (PST), harry
wrote:

Lincoln started the civil war.

No he didn't.

"Decades of growing strife between North and South erupted in civil
war on April 12, 1861, when Confederate artillery opened fire on this
Federal fort in Charleston Harbor. Fort Sumter surrendered 34 hours
later. Union forces would try for nearly four years to take it back. "

Wiki is black today, you will have to suffer from a real URL.

http://www.nps.gov/fosu/index.htm

Maybe he can cite the Hollywood movie that was the source of is claim..
* * Far more reliable than an history book, according to harry..

The war started when seven states seceded from the Union due to
several political issues.
Fort Sumpner was just the first battle.

You really are dense in the head. Political "strife" (perhaps starting
as early as 1833) was NOT _Civil War_. The war started when Fort
Sumpter was fired upon.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Was war declared or was it a "policing action"?
Lot of that goes on with America.
If *not, there are lots of times it could be said to have started.

You tell me harry. *Write your synopsis in this amount of space [ * ]
If you can't break it all down, take as much space you need.

Some of us know more than you about this war.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I expect you were there.

Why would you expect that? I have had my research published.

On Jan 21, 10:56*pm, Oren wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 01:29:23 -0800 (PST), harry
wrote:





On Jan 21, 4:42*am, Oren wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 01:14:19 -0800 (PST), harry
wrote:

On Jan 19, 4:43*pm, Oren wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:07:21 -0800 (PST), harry
wrote:

On Jan 18, 9:45*pm, "Attila.Iskander"
wrote:
"Oren" wrote in message

. ..

On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:22:28 -0800 (PST), harry
wrote:

Lincoln started the civil war.

No he didn't.

"Decades of growing strife between North and South erupted in civil
war on April 12, 1861, when Confederate artillery opened fire on this
Federal fort in Charleston Harbor. Fort Sumter surrendered 34 hours
later. Union forces would try for nearly four years to take it back. "

Wiki is black today, you will have to suffer from a real URL.

http://www.nps.gov/fosu/index.htm

Maybe he can cite the Hollywood movie that was the source of is claim..
* * Far more reliable than an history book, according to harry..

The war started when seven states seceded from the Union due to
several political issues.
Fort Sumpner was just the first battle.

You really are dense in the head. Political "strife" (perhaps starting
as early as 1833) was NOT _Civil War_. The war started when Fort
Sumpter was fired upon.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Was war declared or was it a "policing action"?
Lot of that goes on with America.
If *not, there are lots of times it could be said to have started.

You tell me harry. *Write your synopsis in this amount of space [ * ]
If you can't break it all down, take as much space you need.

Some of us know more than you about this war.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I expect you were there.

Why would you expect that? *I have had my research published.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Oh?

"harry" wrote in message
...
On Jan 18, 9:45 pm, "Attila.Iskander"
wrote:
"Oren" wrote in message

...

On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:22:28 -0800 (PST), harry
wrote:

Lincoln started the civil war.

No he didn't.

"Decades of growing strife between North and South erupted in civil
war on April 12, 1861, when Confederate artillery opened fire on this
Federal fort in Charleston Harbor. Fort Sumter surrendered 34 hours
later. Union forces would try for nearly four years to take it back. "

Wiki is black today, you will have to suffer from a real URL.

http://www.nps.gov/fosu/index.htm

Maybe he can cite the Hollywood movie that was the source of is claim..
Far more reliable than an history book, according to harry..

The war started when seven states seceded from the Union due to
several political issues.

Why harry.
I'm so impressed..

Fort Sumpner was just the first battle.


Well, maybe not that much.

"harry" wrote in message
...
On Jan 19, 4:43 pm, Oren wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:07:21 -0800 (PST), harry
wrote:





On Jan 18, 9:45 pm, "Attila.Iskander"
wrote:
"Oren" wrote in message

. ..

On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:22:28 -0800 (PST), harry

wrote:

Lincoln started the civil war.

No he didn't.

"Decades of growing strife between North and South erupted in civil
war on April 12, 1861, when Confederate artillery opened fire on
this
Federal fort in Charleston Harbor. Fort Sumter surrendered 34 hours
later. Union forces would try for nearly four years to take it back.
"

Wiki is black today, you will have to suffer from a real URL.

http://www.nps.gov/fosu/index.htm

Maybe he can cite the Hollywood movie that was the source of is
claim..
Far more reliable than an history book, according to harry..

The war started when seven states seceded from the Union due to
several political issues.
Fort Sumpner was just the first battle.

You really are dense in the head. Political "strife" (perhaps starting
as early as 1833) was NOT _Civil War_. The war started when Fort
Sumpter was fired upon.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Was war declared or was it a "policing action"?

Attacking the other side is as good a declaration as any.
Remember Pearl Harbor ??

Lot of that goes on with America.
If not, there are lots of times it could be said to have started.

yawn
more weaseling

On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 19:23:30 -0600, "Attila.Iskander"
wrote:


"harry" wrote in message
...
On Jan 18, 9:45 pm, "Attila.Iskander"
wrote:
"Oren" wrote in message

...

On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:22:28 -0800 (PST), harry
wrote:

Lincoln started the civil war.

No he didn't.

"Decades of growing strife between North and South erupted in civil
war on April 12, 1861, when Confederate artillery opened fire on this
Federal fort in Charleston Harbor. Fort Sumter surrendered 34 hours
later. Union forces would try for nearly four years to take it back. "

Wiki is black today, you will have to suffer from a real URL.

http://www.nps.gov/fosu/index.htm

Maybe he can cite the Hollywood movie that was the source of is claim..
Far more reliable than an history book, according to harry..

The war started when seven states seceded from the Union due to
several political issues.

Why harry.
I'm so impressed..


He can't account for why the Confederate States Army Battle flag had
13 stars!

Fort Sumpner was just the first battle.


Well, maybe not that much.


I have book compilation of news paper reported events during the Fort
Sumpter siege. (gift)

Folks in Charleston sat by the sea shore to watch the fireworks. Even
had picnic snacks.

Same behavior during First Manassas.

On 1/22/2012 7:50 PM, Oren wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 19:23:30 -0600, "Attila.Iskander"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Jan 18, 9:45 pm,
wrote:
wrote in message

...

On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:22:28 -0800 (PST),
wrote:
Lincoln started the civil war.
No he didn't.
"Decades of growing strife between North and South erupted in civil
war on April 12, 1861, when Confederate artillery opened fire on this
Federal fort in Charleston Harbor. Fort Sumter surrendered 34 hours
later. Union forces would try for nearly four years to take it back. "
Wiki is black today, you will have to suffer from a real URL.
http://www.nps.gov/fosu/index.htm
Maybe he can cite the Hollywood movie that was the source of is claim..
Far more reliable than an history book, according to harry..
The war started when seven states seceded from the Union due to
several political issues.
Why harry.
I'm so impressed..

He can't account for why the Confederate States Army Battle flag had
13 stars!

Fort Sumpner was just the first battle.

Well, maybe not that much.

I have book compilation of news paper reported events during the Fort
Sumpter siege. (gift)

No doubt named for it's leaky basement.

On Jan 23, 1:24*am, "Attila.Iskander"
wrote:
"harry" wrote in message

...





On Jan 19, 4:43 pm, Oren wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:07:21 -0800 (PST), harry
wrote:

On Jan 18, 9:45 pm, "Attila.Iskander"
wrote:
"Oren" wrote in message

. ..

On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:22:28 -0800 (PST), harry

wrote:

Lincoln started the civil war.

No he didn't.

"Decades of growing strife between North and South erupted in civil
war on April 12, 1861, when Confederate artillery opened fire on
this
Federal fort in Charleston Harbor. Fort Sumter surrendered 34 hours
later. Union forces would try for nearly four years to take it back.
"

Wiki is black today, you will have to suffer from a real URL.

http://www.nps.gov/fosu/index.htm

Maybe he can cite the Hollywood movie that was the source of is
claim..
* * Far more reliable than an history book, according to harry...

The war started when seven states seceded from the Union due to
several political issues.
Fort Sumpner was just the first battle.

You really are dense in the head. Political "strife" (perhaps starting
as early as 1833) was NOT _Civil War_. The war started when Fort
Sumpter was fired upon.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Was war declared or was it a "policing action"?

Attacking the other side is as good a declaration as any.
* * Remember Pearl Harbor ??

Lot of that goes on with America.
If *not, there are lots of times it could be said to have started.

yawn
* * more weaseling- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Remember what America did to Japan before Pearl Harbour?
I thought not. They don't mention it in Hollywood epics.

And when you've found out, draw the parallel between that and Iran and
the Straights of Hormuz today.

"harry" wrote in message
...
On Jan 23, 1:24 am, "Attila.Iskander"
wrote:
"harry" wrote in message

...





On Jan 19, 4:43 pm, Oren wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:07:21 -0800 (PST), harry
wrote:

On Jan 18, 9:45 pm, "Attila.Iskander"
wrote:
"Oren" wrote in message

. ..

On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:22:28 -0800 (PST), harry

wrote:

Lincoln started the civil war.

No he didn't.

"Decades of growing strife between North and South erupted in
civil
war on April 12, 1861, when Confederate artillery opened fire on
this
Federal fort in Charleston Harbor. Fort Sumter surrendered 34
hours
later. Union forces would try for nearly four years to take it
back.
"

Wiki is black today, you will have to suffer from a real URL.

http://www.nps.gov/fosu/index.htm

Maybe he can cite the Hollywood movie that was the source of is
claim..
Far more reliable than an history book, according to harry..

The war started when seven states seceded from the Union due to
several political issues.
Fort Sumpner was just the first battle.

You really are dense in the head. Political "strife" (perhaps starting
as early as 1833) was NOT _Civil War_. The war started when Fort
Sumpter was fired upon.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Was war declared or was it a "policing action"?

Attacking the other side is as good a declaration as any.
Remember Pearl Harbor ??

Lot of that goes on with America.
If not, there are lots of times it could be said to have started.

yawn
more weaseling- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Remember what America did to Japan before Pearl Harbour?
I thought not. They don't mention it in Hollywood epics.


I remember what Japan was doing to other countries in that area
Rape of Nanking, anyone ?

Apparently you failed to see that "Hollywood epic", you ignorant bint.



And when you've found out, draw the parallel between that and Iran and
the Straights of Hormuz today.

What "parallel" is that ?
You mean the one where Iran is
- financing terrorists around the world ?
- has repeatedly promised to help destroy Israel ?
- has already a long list of acts of war against it's neighbor's ?
- has already attempted to block the Straight of Hormuz in violation of
International law
- does NOT respect the embassies of other countries on it's soil ?
- has no respect for the rights of it's own citizens ?
to name a few ??
What parallels did you actually have in that (absent) mind of yours ?

On Jan 23, 8:06*pm, "Attila.Iskander"
wrote:
"harry" wrote in message

...





On Jan 23, 1:24 am, "Attila.Iskander"
wrote:
"harry" wrote in message

....

On Jan 19, 4:43 pm, Oren wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:07:21 -0800 (PST), harry
wrote:

On Jan 18, 9:45 pm, "Attila.Iskander"
wrote:
"Oren" wrote in message

. ..

On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:22:28 -0800 (PST), harry

wrote:

Lincoln started the civil war.

No he didn't.

"Decades of growing strife between North and South erupted in
civil
war on April 12, 1861, when Confederate artillery opened fire on
this
Federal fort in Charleston Harbor. Fort Sumter surrendered 34
hours
later. Union forces would try for nearly four years to take it
back.
"

Wiki is black today, you will have to suffer from a real URL.

http://www.nps.gov/fosu/index.htm

Maybe he can cite the Hollywood movie that was the source of is
claim..
* * Far more reliable than an history book, according to harry..

The war started when seven states seceded from the Union due to
several political issues.
Fort Sumpner was just the first battle.

You really are dense in the head. Political "strife" (perhaps starting
as early as 1833) was NOT _Civil War_. The war started when Fort
Sumpter was fired upon.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Was war declared or was it a "policing action"?

Attacking the other side is as good a declaration as any.
* * Remember Pearl Harbor ??

Lot of that goes on with America.
If *not, there are lots of times it could be said to have started.

yawn
* * more weaseling- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Remember what America did to Japan before Pearl Harbour?
I thought not. *They don't mention it in Hollywood epics.

I remember what Japan was doing to other countries in that area
* * Rape of Nanking, anyone ?

Apparently you failed to see that "Hollywood epic", you ignorant bint.

And when you've found out, draw the parallel between that and Iran and
the Straights of Hormuz today.

What "parallel" is that ?
You mean the one where Iran is
*- financing terrorists around the world ?
*- has repeatedly promised to help destroy Israel ?
*- has already a long list of acts of war against it's neighbor's ?
*- has already attempted to block the Straight of Hormuz in violation of
International law
*- does NOT respect the embassies of other countries on it's soil ?
*- has no respect for the rights of it's own citizens ?
to name a few ??
What parallels did you actually have in that (absent) mind of yours ?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Kaif halek!
I see you have knowledge of Arabic?

Most of the above things the USA has also done. Plus a few more.
Israelis deserve to die. As does anyone who drops (US supplied)
phosporous on women and children.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X73idhOLK7o
This is your Israeii scum allies.

Have a look at this you ****ing American scum.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q5CvGkT1wuQ

*- has already attempted to block the Straight of Hormuz in violation of
International law
*- does NOT respect the embassies of other countries on it's soil ?
*- has no respect for the rights of it's own citizens ?
to name a few ??
What parallels did you actually have in that (absent) mind of yours ?- Hide quoted text -

America blockaded Japan from it's oil supply.Somehow that was OK.
But if Iran wants to do the same, somehow it's not.

"harry" wrote in message
...
- has already attempted to block the Straight of Hormuz in violation of
International law
- does NOT respect the embassies of other countries on it's soil ?
- has no respect for the rights of it's own citizens ?
to name a few ??
What parallels did you actually have in that (absent) mind of yours ?-
Hide quoted text -

America blockaded Japan from it's oil supply.Somehow that was OK.
But if Iran wants to do the same, somehow it's not.

And naturally, the REASON for either of them is COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT to you
Right ?
(That's intellectual equal to claiming that justified homicide and
murder are the same because someone died, while ignoring the difference..)

So tell us harry, WHY did either of those blockades occur ???

"harry" wrote in message
...
On Jan 23, 8:06 pm, "Attila.Iskander"
wrote:
"harry" wrote in message

...





On Jan 23, 1:24 am, "Attila.Iskander"
wrote:
"harry" wrote in message

...

On Jan 19, 4:43 pm, Oren wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:07:21 -0800 (PST), harry

wrote:

On Jan 18, 9:45 pm, "Attila.Iskander"
wrote:
"Oren" wrote in message

. ..

On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:22:28 -0800 (PST), harry

wrote:

Lincoln started the civil war.

No he didn't.

"Decades of growing strife between North and South erupted in
civil
war on April 12, 1861, when Confederate artillery opened fire
on
this
Federal fort in Charleston Harbor. Fort Sumter surrendered 34
hours
later. Union forces would try for nearly four years to take it
back.
"

Wiki is black today, you will have to suffer from a real URL.

http://www.nps.gov/fosu/index.htm

Maybe he can cite the Hollywood movie that was the source of is
claim..
Far more reliable than an history book, according to harry..

The war started when seven states seceded from the Union due to
several political issues.
Fort Sumpner was just the first battle.

You really are dense in the head. Political "strife" (perhaps
starting
as early as 1833) was NOT _Civil War_. The war started when Fort
Sumpter was fired upon.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Was war declared or was it a "policing action"?

Attacking the other side is as good a declaration as any.
Remember Pearl Harbor ??

Lot of that goes on with America.
If not, there are lots of times it could be said to have started.

yawn
more weaseling- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Remember what America did to Japan before Pearl Harbour?
I thought not. They don't mention it in Hollywood epics.

I remember what Japan was doing to other countries in that area
Rape of Nanking, anyone ?

Apparently you failed to see that "Hollywood epic", you ignorant bint.

And when you've found out, draw the parallel between that and Iran and
the Straights of Hormuz today.

What "parallel" is that ?
You mean the one where Iran is
- financing terrorists around the world ?
- has repeatedly promised to help destroy Israel ?
- has already a long list of acts of war against it's neighbor's ?
- has already attempted to block the Straight of Hormuz in violation of
International law
- does NOT respect the embassies of other countries on it's soil ?
- has no respect for the rights of it's own citizens ?
to name a few ??
What parallels did you actually have in that (absent) mind of yours ?-
Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Kaif halek!
I see you have knowledge of Arabic?

Most of the above things the USA has also done. Plus a few more.
Israelis deserve to die. As does anyone who drops (US supplied)
phosporous on women and children.


AH,
Your true fascist self surfaces finally.
Do you also wear jackboots ?

So tell us how Marines ****ing on a couple of dead terrorists compares to
the video of Daniel Pearl getting his head cut off ??


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X73idhOLK7o
This is your Israeii scum allies.


Already covered the atrocities of the scum you support
Compared to them the Americans and Israelis are civilized

Meanwhile your scum islamofascists friends have no problems going after
women and children with assorted bombs set off in public places
I won't even bother listing their atrocities
You can educate yourself at www.ReligionofPeace.com
Here's today's
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/im...anyo-after.jpg


Have a look at this you ****ing American scum.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q5CvGkT1wuQ

Your bigotry is only surpassed by your prejudice, which is only surpassed by
your ignorance

On Jan 24, 4:26*pm, "Attila.Iskander"
wrote:
"harry" wrote in message

...





On Jan 23, 8:06 pm, "Attila.Iskander"
wrote:
"harry" wrote in message

...

On Jan 23, 1:24 am, "Attila.Iskander"
wrote:
"harry" wrote in message

...

On Jan 19, 4:43 pm, Oren wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:07:21 -0800 (PST), harry

wrote:

On Jan 18, 9:45 pm, "Attila.Iskander"
wrote:
"Oren" wrote in message

. ..

On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:22:28 -0800 (PST), harry

wrote:

Lincoln started the civil war.

No he didn't.

"Decades of growing strife between North and South erupted in
civil
war on April 12, 1861, when Confederate artillery opened fire
on
this
Federal fort in Charleston Harbor. Fort Sumter surrendered 34
hours
later. Union forces would try for nearly four years to take it
back.
"

Wiki is black today, you will have to suffer from a real URL.

http://www.nps.gov/fosu/index.htm

Maybe he can cite the Hollywood movie that was the source of is
claim..
* * Far more reliable than an history book, according to harry..

The war started when seven states seceded from the Union due to
several political issues.
Fort Sumpner was just the first battle.

You really are dense in the head. Political "strife" (perhaps
starting
as early as 1833) was NOT _Civil War_. The war started when Fort
Sumpter was fired upon.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Was war declared or was it a "policing action"?

Attacking the other side is as good a declaration as any.
* * Remember Pearl Harbor ??

Lot of that goes on with America.
If *not, there are lots of times it could be said to have started.

yawn
* * more weaseling- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Remember what America did to Japan before Pearl Harbour?
I thought not. *They don't mention it in Hollywood epics.

I remember what Japan was doing to other countries in that area
* * Rape of Nanking, anyone ?

Apparently you failed to see that "Hollywood epic", you ignorant bint.

And when you've found out, draw the parallel between that and Iran and
the Straights of Hormuz today.

What "parallel" is that ?
You mean the one where Iran is
*- financing terrorists around the world ?
*- has repeatedly promised to help destroy Israel ?
*- has already a long list of acts of war against it's neighbor's ?
*- has already attempted to block the Straight of Hormuz in violation of
International law
*- does NOT respect the embassies of other countries on it's soil ?
*- has no respect for the rights of it's own citizens ?
to name a few ??
What parallels did you actually have in that (absent) mind of yours ?-
Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Kaif halek!
I see you have knowledge of Arabic?

Most of the above things the USA has also done. *Plus a few more.
Israelis deserve to die. As does anyone who drops (US supplied)
phosporous on women and children.

AH,
* * Your true fascist self surfaces finally.
Do you also wear jackboots ?

So tell us how Marines ****ing on a couple of dead terrorists compares to
the video of Daniel Pearl getting his head cut off ??

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X73idhOLK7o
This is your Israeii scum allies.

Already covered the atrocities of the scum you support
Compared to them the Americans and Israelis are civilized

Meanwhile your scum islamofascists friends have no problems going after
women and children with assorted bombs set off in public places
I won't even bother listing their atrocities
You can educate yourself atwww.ReligionofPeace.com
Here's today's
* * *http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/im...anyo-after.jpg

Have a look at this you ****ing American scum.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q5CvGkT1wuQ

Your bigotry is only surpassed by your prejudice, which is only surpassed by
your *ignorance- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yes, you and your Jewish friends have really let the genie loose.
Now we are all suffering.

On 1/25/2012 3:00 AM, harry wrote:
On Jan 24, 4:26 pm,
wrote:
wrote in message

...





On Jan 23, 8:06 pm,
wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Jan 23, 1:24 am,
wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Jan 19, 4:43 pm, wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:07:21 -0800 (PST), harry

wrote:
On Jan 18, 9:45 pm,
wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:22:28 -0800 (PST), harry

wrote:
Lincoln started the civil war.
No he didn't.
"Decades of growing strife between North and South erupted in
civil
war on April 12, 1861, when Confederate artillery opened fire
on
this
Federal fort in Charleston Harbor. Fort Sumter surrendered 34
hours
later. Union forces would try for nearly four years to take it
back.
"
Wiki is black today, you will have to suffer from a real URL.
http://www.nps.gov/fosu/index.htm
Maybe he can cite the Hollywood movie that was the source of is
claim..
Far more reliable than an history book, according to harry..
The war started when seven states seceded from the Union due to
several political issues.
Fort Sumpner was just the first battle.
You really are dense in the head. Political "strife" (perhaps
starting
as early as 1833) was NOT _Civil War_. The war started when Fort
Sumpter was fired upon.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Was war declared or was it a "policing action"?
Attacking the other side is as good a declaration as any.
Remember Pearl Harbor ??
Lot of that goes on with America.
If not, there are lots of times it could be said to have started.
yawn
more weaseling- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Remember what America did to Japan before Pearl Harbour?
I thought not. They don't mention it in Hollywood epics.
I remember what Japan was doing to other countries in that area
Rape of Nanking, anyone ?
Apparently you failed to see that "Hollywood epic", you ignorant bint.
And when you've found out, draw the parallel between that and Iran and
the Straights of Hormuz today.
What "parallel" is that ?
You mean the one where Iran is
- financing terrorists around the world ?
- has repeatedly promised to help destroy Israel ?
- has already a long list of acts of war against it's neighbor's ?
- has already attempted to block the Straight of Hormuz in violation of
International law
- does NOT respect the embassies of other countries on it's soil ?
- has no respect for the rights of it's own citizens ?
to name a few ??
What parallels did you actually have in that (absent) mind of yours ?-
Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Kaif halek!
I see you have knowledge of Arabic?
Most of the above things the USA has also done. Plus a few more.
Israelis deserve to die. As does anyone who drops (US supplied)
phosporous on women and children.
AH,
Your true fascist self surfaces finally.
Do you also wear jackboots ?

So tell us how Marines ****ing on a couple of dead terrorists compares to
the video of Daniel Pearl getting his head cut off ??

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X73idhOLK7o
This is your Israeii scum allies.
Already covered the atrocities of the scum you support
Compared to them the Americans and Israelis are civilized

Meanwhile your scum islamofascists friends have no problems going after
women and children with assorted bombs set off in public places
I won't even bother listing their atrocities
You can educate yourself atwww.ReligionofPeace.com
Here's today's
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/im...anyo-after.jpg

Have a look at this you ****ing American scum.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q5CvGkT1wuQ
Your bigotry is only surpassed by your prejudice, which is only surpassed by
your ignorance- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Yes, you and your Jewish friends have really let the genie loose.
Now we are all suffering.
harry, you are a ****ing idiot. Your posts continue to reflect how
narrow minded and bigoted you are. Your insistence on posting all of
your **** on a home repair news forum further illustrates just what a
total jerk you are.

"harry" wrote in message
...
On Jan 24, 4:26 pm, "Attila.Iskander"
wrote:
"harry" wrote in message

Most of the above things the USA has also done. Plus a few more.
Israelis deserve to die. As does anyone who drops (US supplied)
phosporous on women and children.

AH,
Your true fascist self surfaces finally.
Do you also wear jackboots ?

So tell us how Marines ****ing on a couple of dead terrorists compares to
the video of Daniel Pearl getting his head cut off ??

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X73idhOLK7o
This is your Israeii scum allies.

Already covered the atrocities of the scum you support
Compared to them the Americans and Israelis are civilized

Meanwhile your scum islamofascists friends have no problems going after
women and children with assorted bombs set off in public places
I won't even bother listing their atrocities
You can educate yourself atwww.ReligionofPeace.com
Here's today's
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/im...anyo-after.jpg

Have a look at this you ****ing American scum.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q5CvGkT1wuQ

Your bigotry is only surpassed by your prejudice, which is only surpassed
by
your ignorance-


Yes, you and your Jewish friends have really let the genie loose.

What "Jewish friends" are you babbling about dummy ?
And what "genie being loosed" while you're at it ?

Islamofascists have declared war on the rest of the world from the day the
Koran made the distinction between Dar-al-Islam and Dar-al-Harb.
And both Muslims and non-Muslins have been suffering continuously ever since
from that death cult.

You should read up on that
Who knows ?
You might even learn something




Now we are all suffering.

You were suffering from the day you were conceived
- From terminal stupidity.

On Jan 25, 10:10*am, Smarty wrote:
On 1/25/2012 3:00 AM, harry wrote:



harry, you are a ****ing idiot. Your posts continue to reflect how
narrow minded and bigoted you are. Your insistence on posting all of
your **** on a home repair news forum further illustrates just what a
total jerk you are.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yet you feel the need to respond.
I seeyou have nothing much to say?
There is nobody more bigoted than Americans.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkd3O62oBSA
Watch it all the way through.

"harry" wrote in message
...
On Jan 25, 10:10 am, Smarty wrote:
On 1/25/2012 3:00 AM, harry wrote:



harry, you are a ****ing idiot. Your posts continue to reflect how
narrow minded and bigoted you are. Your insistence on posting all of
your **** on a home repair news forum further illustrates just what a
total jerk you are.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yet you feel the need to respond.
I seeyou have nothing much to say?
There is nobody more bigoted than Americans.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkd3O62oBSA
Watch it all the way through.

LOL
Poor harry
Naturally in a population of 330,00,000, there are bound to be a few
Hell just look at you. And the UK doesn't even have that large a population

But it takes a REAL IDIOT (like you) to presume that just because there are
a few, the it's true for all..
Thank you for the continued proof of what a bigoted mental midget you
really are

On 1/25/2012 11:44 AM, harry wrote:
On Jan 25, 10:10 am, wrote:
On 1/25/2012 3:00 AM, harry wrote:



harry, you are a ****ing idiot. Your posts continue to reflect how
narrow minded and bigoted you are. Your insistence on posting all of
your **** on a home repair news forum further illustrates just what a
total jerk you are.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yet you feel the need to respond.
I seeyou have nothing much to say?
There is nobody more bigoted than Americans.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkd3O62oBSA
Watch it all the way through.

Perhaps if you were to define "bigoted" people may understand what you
mean? I see and hear the words "bigot" and "bigoted" misused much like
the word "racist" every day. I would hope you understand what I mean by
writing that the words are often misused.

TDD

On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:44:47 -0800 (PST), harry wrote:

On Jan 25, 10:10*am, Smarty wrote:
On 1/25/2012 3:00 AM, harry wrote:



harry, you are a ****ing idiot. Your posts continue to reflect how
narrow minded and bigoted you are. Your insistence on posting all of
your **** on a home repair news forum further illustrates just what a
total jerk you are.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yet you feel the need to respond.
I seeyou have nothing much to say?
There is nobody more bigoted than Americans.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkd3O62oBSA
Watch it all the way through.

He said what everyone else here has known for some time.