Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I want to put a network jack and a telephone jack in the same
location. Does a CAT6 cable have enough wires for me to do this or do I have to run a CAT3 cable too? Thank you in advance for all replies. -- When I am in the kitchen, I often kick one of my cat's balls. After I kick it, he will sometimes play with it for a few seconds to several minutes. His favorite are the ones that rattle. He'll play with any ball that makes noise. |
#2
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 8, 7:09*am, Daniel Prince wrote:
I want to put a network jack and a telephone jack in the same location. *Does a CAT6 cable have enough wires for me to do this or do I have to run a CAT3 cable too? *Thank you in advance for all replies. -- When I am in the kitchen, I often kick one of my cat's balls. After I kick it, he will sometimes play with it for a few seconds to several minutes. *His favorite are the ones that rattle. *He'll play with any ball that makes noise. Cat6 has enough wires but personally I'd run two cables. I'd be worried that the ring signal would generate crosstalk. |
#3
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 8, 8:01*am, jamesgangnc wrote:
On Mar 8, 7:09*am, Daniel Prince wrote: I want to put a network jack and a telephone jack in the same location. *Does a CAT6 cable have enough wires for me to do this or do I have to run a CAT3 cable too? *Thank you in advance for all replies. -- When I am in the kitchen, I often kick one of my cat's balls. After I kick it, he will sometimes play with it for a few seconds to several minutes. *His favorite are the ones that rattle. *He'll play with any ball that makes noise. Cat6 has enough wires but personally I'd run two cables. *I'd be worried that the ring signal would generate crosstalk. And AFAIK it's perfectly acceptable to run two Cat6 rather than use old school phone wire - that is, Cat6 works fine as phone cable. That way the cables can be repurposed for phone and/or network just by changing the jack and punchdown at each end. (assuming, of course, that the phone and network are both terminated in the same area and/or a "structured wiring" panel.) If I were wiring a new house, I think I'd put in a SW panel in the basement, then run two Cat6 and two RG-6 to each room. That way I'd have phone, network, cable, and antenna available everywhere. nate |
#4
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/8/2011 7:09 AM, Daniel Prince wrote:
I want to put a network jack and a telephone jack in the same location. Does a CAT6 cable have enough wires for me to do this or do I have to run a CAT3 cable too? Thank you in advance for all replies. The idea of split pairs isn't used much anymore. For various reasons including both gigabit Ethernet and PoE use the formally spare pairs. |
#5
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 8, 7:09*am, Daniel Prince wrote:
I want to put a network jack and a telephone jack in the same location. *Does a CAT6 cable have enough wires for me to do this or do I have to run a CAT3 cable too? *Thank you in advance for all replies. -- When I am in the kitchen, I often kick one of my cat's balls. After I kick it, he will sometimes play with it for a few seconds to several minutes. *His favorite are the ones that rattle. *He'll play with any ball that makes noise. I use the same CAT 5 cable for both phone and data in my house. Data only uses two pairs, phone gets a pair I used to run a fax machine on it too. Never had a problem. Jimmie |
#6
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 05:01:39 -0800 (PST), jamesgangnc
wrote: On Mar 8, 7:09*am, Daniel Prince wrote: I want to put a network jack and a telephone jack in the same location. *Does a CAT6 cable have enough wires for me to do this or do I have to run a CAT3 cable too? *Thank you in advance for all replies. -- When I am in the kitchen, I often kick one of my cat's balls. After I kick it, he will sometimes play with it for a few seconds to several minutes. *His favorite are the ones that rattle. *He'll play with any ball that makes noise. Cat6 has enough wires but personally I'd run two cables. I'd be worried that the ring signal would generate crosstalk. Second |
#7
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Daniel Prince wrote in
: I want to put a network jack and a telephone jack in the same location. Does a CAT6 cable have enough wires for me to do this or do I have to run a CAT3 cable too? Thank you in advance for all replies. No problems mixing signals over CAT5 or 6. Our office is wired exactly that way; CAT5/6 handles voice, fax, and data just dandy, all at the same time, and all in the same cables. Additionally, if you look at larger installations, all cables of all kinds are often zip-tied into a single bundle. So evidently the pro's don't have any issues with interference either. -- Tegger |
#8
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 8, 10:38*am, JIMMIE wrote:
On Mar 8, 7:09*am, Daniel Prince wrote: I want to put a network jack and a telephone jack in the same location. *Does a CAT6 cable have enough wires for me to do this or do I have to run a CAT3 cable too? *Thank you in advance for all replies. -- When I am in the kitchen, I often kick one of my cat's balls. After I kick it, he will sometimes play with it for a few seconds to several minutes. *His favorite are the ones that rattle. *He'll play with any ball that makes noise. I use the same CAT 5 cable for both phone and data in my house. Data only uses two pairs, phone gets a *pair I used to run a fax machine on it too. Never had a problem. "Data only uses two pairs" I believe that is only true for 10BaseT and 100BaseT - if you are using gigabit ethernet - and I would assume that the OP is, or is planning on it sometime in the future, otherwise he wouldn't be spending the extra $$ for Cat6 - that will use all four pairs. nate |
#9
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/8/2011 11:40 AM, Tegger wrote:
Daniel wrote in : I want to put a network jack and a telephone jack in the same location. Does a CAT6 cable have enough wires for me to do this or do I have to run a CAT3 cable too? Thank you in advance for all replies. No problems mixing signals over CAT5 or 6. Our office is wired exactly that way; CAT5/6 handles voice, fax, and data just dandy, all at the same time, and all in the same cables. Additionally, if you look at larger installations, all cables of all kinds are often zip-tied into a single bundle. So evidently the pro's don't have any issues with interference either. It has to do with the varying twist of the pairs. When I run a certification test on network cables, the separate pairs check out at different lengths then I get an average length from the test equipment. If you run a Cat6 Gigabit connection, all four pairs are used for the data as opposed to only two pair when a 10/100 connection is used. Good wiring practice demands that no cable ties are cinched real tight on any network cables or bundles of network cables. Sharp bends in Cat5/6 can also alter the signal capabilities of the network cables. I can test a length of network cable with my certifier, get a good reading then make a sharp 90° bend in the cable and it will fail the test. TDD |
#10
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 8, 2:28*pm, The Daring Dufas
wrote: On 3/8/2011 11:40 AM, Tegger wrote: Daniel *wrote in : I want to put a network jack and a telephone jack in the same location. *Does a CAT6 cable have enough wires for me to do this or do I have to run a CAT3 cable too? *Thank you in advance for all replies. No problems mixing signals over CAT5 or 6. Our office is wired exactly that way; CAT5/6 handles voice, fax, and data just dandy, all at the same time, and all in the same cables. Additionally, if you look at larger installations, all cables of all kinds are often zip-tied into a single bundle. So evidently the pro's don't have any issues with interference either. It has to do with the varying twist of the pairs. When I run a certification test on network cables, the separate pairs check out at different lengths then I get an average length from the test equipment. If you run a Cat6 Gigabit connection, all four pairs are used for the data as opposed to only two pair when a 10/100 connection is used. Good wiring practice demands that no cable ties are cinched real tight on any network cables or bundles of network cables. Sharp bends in Cat5/6 can also alter the signal capabilities of the network cables. I can test a length of network cable with my certifier, get a good reading then make a sharp 90 bend in the cable and it will fail the test. TDD Yeah, when I put mine in I never dreamed of gigabit though-put. Still cant see it in a home installation. Where I work if we need more than what CAT 5 can handle we go to fiber. Jimmie |
#11
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Daring Dufas wrote in
: It has to do with the varying twist of the pairs. When I run a certification test on network cables, the separate pairs check out at different lengths then I get an average length from the test equipment. If you run a Cat6 Gigabit connection, all four pairs are used for the data as opposed to only two pair when a 10/100 connection is used. Good wiring practice demands that no cable ties are cinched real tight on any network cables or bundles of network cables. Sharp bends in Cat5/6 can also alter the signal capabilities of the network cables. I can test a length of network cable with my certifier, get a good reading then make a sharp 90° bend in the cable and it will fail the test. I've seen many large-company installations with cable ties reefed as tight as they'll go, and with sharp bends around corners. I've often wondered if their employees have network problems. -- Tegger |
#12
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/8/2011 6:05 PM, Tegger wrote:
The Daring wrote in : It has to do with the varying twist of the pairs. When I run a certification test on network cables, the separate pairs check out at different lengths then I get an average length from the test equipment. If you run a Cat6 Gigabit connection, all four pairs are used for the data as opposed to only two pair when a 10/100 connection is used. Good wiring practice demands that no cable ties are cinched real tight on any network cables or bundles of network cables. Sharp bends in Cat5/6 can also alter the signal capabilities of the network cables. I can test a length of network cable with my certifier, get a good reading then make a sharp 90° bend in the cable and it will fail the test. I've seen many large-company installations with cable ties reefed as tight as they'll go, and with sharp bends around corners. I've often wondered if their employees have network problems. Often they don't even realize it. The mechanism built into network interfaces to correct data errors is pretty robust. So often "see it works" is declared when something is plugged in and they can ping some other device not realizing how crappy the throughput is because of the amount of error correction needed. |
#13
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/8/2011 12:40 PM, Tegger wrote:
Daniel wrote in : I want to put a network jack and a telephone jack in the same location. Does a CAT6 cable have enough wires for me to do this or do I have to run a CAT3 cable too? Thank you in advance for all replies. No problems mixing signals over CAT5 or 6. Our office is wired exactly that way; CAT5/6 handles voice, fax, and data just dandy, all at the same time, and all in the same cables. Additionally, if you look at larger installations, all cables of all kinds are often zip-tied into a single bundle. So evidently the pro's don't have any issues with interference either. Often the "pros" really aren't. A lot of these cabling companies pay walmart wages to anyone they can get who can throw stuff in. Best I ever saw was a cable guy from one of the local name brand high priced places pulling a run and he ran out of cable so he stripped the ends of that cable and a new roll and twisted them together and threw them above the suspended ceiling. The other famous one is to crimp RJ-45 plugs onto solid wire which of course will yield a "see it works" moment with plenty of fun for those to follow. Then others will look at it and think that is how it should be done and then go off and replicate it elsewhere. |
#14
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
George wrote in
: Best I ever saw was a cable guy from one of the local name brand high priced places pulling a run and he ran out of cable so he stripped the ends of that cable and a new roll and twisted them together and threw them above the suspended ceiling. Let me guess... he used to install automotive audio equipment, right? -- Tegger |
#15
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/8/2011 5:05 PM, Tegger wrote:
The Daring wrote in : It has to do with the varying twist of the pairs. When I run a certification test on network cables, the separate pairs check out at different lengths then I get an average length from the test equipment. If you run a Cat6 Gigabit connection, all four pairs are used for the data as opposed to only two pair when a 10/100 connection is used. Good wiring practice demands that no cable ties are cinched real tight on any network cables or bundles of network cables. Sharp bends in Cat5/6 can also alter the signal capabilities of the network cables. I can test a length of network cable with my certifier, get a good reading then make a sharp 90° bend in the cable and it will fail the test. I've seen many large-company installations with cable ties reefed as tight as they'll go, and with sharp bends around corners. I've often wondered if their employees have network problems. Me and a helper spent 6 hours 50 feet in the air at a Sam's Club one night so we could trace out a fiber optic cable from the second floor server room at the front of the huge store all the way to the back so we could find a switch that corporate IT had no idea of its location. From the switch we had to find a wireless access point 320 feet away on a Cat5 cable to troubleshoot it. All that trouble was caused by a goober improperly installing an RJ45 plug 50 feet in the air! I find silly crap all the time that keeps a network from communicating. My favorite is when somebody tries to see how far they can stretch a Cat5 cable. Pull it hard enough and it will stretch, it kind of messes up the impedance of the cable but they made it fit. :-) TDD |
#16
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/8/2011 6:19 PM, George wrote:
On 3/8/2011 12:40 PM, Tegger wrote: Daniel wrote in : I want to put a network jack and a telephone jack in the same location. Does a CAT6 cable have enough wires for me to do this or do I have to run a CAT3 cable too? Thank you in advance for all replies. No problems mixing signals over CAT5 or 6. Our office is wired exactly that way; CAT5/6 handles voice, fax, and data just dandy, all at the same time, and all in the same cables. Additionally, if you look at larger installations, all cables of all kinds are often zip-tied into a single bundle. So evidently the pro's don't have any issues with interference either. Often the "pros" really aren't. A lot of these cabling companies pay walmart wages to anyone they can get who can throw stuff in. Best I ever saw was a cable guy from one of the local name brand high priced places pulling a run and he ran out of cable so he stripped the ends of that cable and a new roll and twisted them together and threw them above the suspended ceiling. The other famous one is to crimp RJ-45 plugs onto solid wire which of course will yield a "see it works" moment with plenty of fun for those to follow. Then others will look at it and think that is how it should be done and then go off and replicate it elsewhere. There are two different RJ series plugs I have in stock, the clear for stranded wire though most will work just fine on solid and smoky gray which are specifically made for solid wire. I sell phone systems too so I often put RJ11, RJ14 and RJ25 plugs on solid wire when wiring some backboards. TDD TDD |
#17
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 8, 12:40*pm, Tegger wrote:
Daniel Prince wrote : I want to put a network jack and a telephone jack in the same location. *Does a CAT6 cable have enough wires for me to do this or do I have to run a CAT3 cable too? *Thank you in advance for all replies. No problems mixing signals over CAT5 or 6. Our office is wired exactly that way; CAT5/6 handles voice, fax, and data just dandy, all at the same time, and all in the same cables. Additionally, if you look at larger installations, all cables of all kinds are often zip-tied into a single bundle. So evidently the pro's don't have any issues with interference either. -- Tegger You sure your phones are not voip? Old school ringer voltage is around 90vac 20 hertz. Depending on the distance from the repeater a lot of voltage can get lost on the line but not always. I'd rather have that at least a few insulation layers away from the data twisted pairs. |
#18
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/8/2011 8:20 PM, The Daring Dufas wrote:
On 3/8/2011 6:19 PM, George wrote: On 3/8/2011 12:40 PM, Tegger wrote: Daniel wrote in : I want to put a network jack and a telephone jack in the same location. Does a CAT6 cable have enough wires for me to do this or do I have to run a CAT3 cable too? Thank you in advance for all replies. No problems mixing signals over CAT5 or 6. Our office is wired exactly that way; CAT5/6 handles voice, fax, and data just dandy, all at the same time, and all in the same cables. Additionally, if you look at larger installations, all cables of all kinds are often zip-tied into a single bundle. So evidently the pro's don't have any issues with interference either. Often the "pros" really aren't. A lot of these cabling companies pay walmart wages to anyone they can get who can throw stuff in. Best I ever saw was a cable guy from one of the local name brand high priced places pulling a run and he ran out of cable so he stripped the ends of that cable and a new roll and twisted them together and threw them above the suspended ceiling. The other famous one is to crimp RJ-45 plugs onto solid wire which of course will yield a "see it works" moment with plenty of fun for those to follow. Then others will look at it and think that is how it should be done and then go off and replicate it elsewhere. There are two different RJ series plugs I have in stock, the clear for stranded wire though most will work just fine on solid and smoky gray which are specifically made for solid wire. I sell phone systems too so I often put RJ11, RJ14 and RJ25 plugs on solid wire when wiring some backboards. TDD TDD Depends what "works fine" means. One of the biggest failure items I see is plugs crimped onto solid wire. If it moves use stranded wire. If fixed you use solid. The phone companies and others arrived at that conclusion quickly for very good reasons a long time ago. For good reason standard practice for premise wiring is to punch horizontal wiring down and then use a patch cable made with stranded wire to connect whatever network device is involved. |
#19
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/9/2011 8:00 AM, George wrote:
On 3/8/2011 8:20 PM, The Daring Dufas wrote: On 3/8/2011 6:19 PM, George wrote: On 3/8/2011 12:40 PM, Tegger wrote: Daniel wrote in : I want to put a network jack and a telephone jack in the same location. Does a CAT6 cable have enough wires for me to do this or do I have to run a CAT3 cable too? Thank you in advance for all replies. No problems mixing signals over CAT5 or 6. Our office is wired exactly that way; CAT5/6 handles voice, fax, and data just dandy, all at the same time, and all in the same cables. Additionally, if you look at larger installations, all cables of all kinds are often zip-tied into a single bundle. So evidently the pro's don't have any issues with interference either. Often the "pros" really aren't. A lot of these cabling companies pay walmart wages to anyone they can get who can throw stuff in. Best I ever saw was a cable guy from one of the local name brand high priced places pulling a run and he ran out of cable so he stripped the ends of that cable and a new roll and twisted them together and threw them above the suspended ceiling. The other famous one is to crimp RJ-45 plugs onto solid wire which of course will yield a "see it works" moment with plenty of fun for those to follow. Then others will look at it and think that is how it should be done and then go off and replicate it elsewhere. There are two different RJ series plugs I have in stock, the clear for stranded wire though most will work just fine on solid and smoky gray which are specifically made for solid wire. I sell phone systems too so I often put RJ11, RJ14 and RJ25 plugs on solid wire when wiring some backboards. TDD TDD Depends what "works fine" means. One of the biggest failure items I see is plugs crimped onto solid wire. If it moves use stranded wire. If fixed you use solid. The phone companies and others arrived at that conclusion quickly for very good reasons a long time ago. For good reason standard practice for premise wiring is to punch horizontal wiring down and then use a patch cable made with stranded wire to connect whatever network device is involved. That's why I buy 1000 foot rolls of silver satin flat stranded phone cord. I can make my own phone cords, patch cords and jumpers. :-) TDD |
#20
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/8/2011 7:28 PM, Tegger wrote:
wrote in : Best I ever saw was a cable guy from one of the local name brand high priced places pulling a run and he ran out of cable so he stripped the ends of that cable and a new roll and twisted them together and threw them above the suspended ceiling. Let me guess... he used to install automotive audio equipment, right? Or maybe security systems... |
#21
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jeff Thies" wrote in message ... A quick Google search yields a morass. Any products or places to buy? A friend of mine put a system from this company into his house and loves it. He's a former hi-fi dealer so he's fairly picky, but he has no complaints with this system at least for casual listening (the in-wall speakers aren't up to the standards of his main audio rig). He ripped all his CDs and other sources in Apple Lossless format to a computer he uses as a music server. The remote control is cool, it's like an iPod and he can dial up whatever music he's in the mood for in whatever room he's in, at least until his wife wants to hear something different. http://www.sonos.com/ I never wanted music in more than two rooms, so I just ran really heavy speaker wire (none of that name-brand audiophile nonsense) from the stereo downstairs up to the bedroom. The run wasnt all that long and I wasn't looking for high volume upstairs so that worked fine. I had a little Sony power amp that drove the upstairs speakers so I didn't even need to mess with a switch, just power down the main amps and power up the amp for the bedroom speakers and that was that. |
#22
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 9, 4:55*pm, "DGDevin" wrote:
"Jeff Thies" *wrote in ... * A quick Google search yields a morass. Any products or places to buy? A friend of mine put a system from this company into his house and loves it. He's a former hi-fi dealer so he's fairly picky, but he has no complaints with this system at least for casual listening (the in-wall speakers aren't up to the standards of his main audio rig). *He ripped all his CDs and other sources in Apple Lossless format to a computer he uses as a music server. The remote control is cool, it's like an iPod and he can dial up whatever music he's in the mood for in whatever room he's in, at least until his wife wants to hear something different. http://www.sonos.com/ I never wanted music in more than two rooms, so I just ran really heavy speaker wire (none of that name-brand audiophile nonsense) from the stereo downstairs up to the bedroom. *The run wasn’t all that long and I wasn't looking for high volume upstairs so that worked fine. *I had a little Sony power amp that drove the upstairs speakers so I didn't even need to mess with a switch, just power down the main amps and power up the amp for the bedroom speakers and that was that. My only suggestion would be to avoid apple's proprientary formats. While a few other vendors are supporting them they are not supported by everyone. If you stick to the non-proprientary formats you can copy the music back to just about any device. If you ripped it form cds it will not have any licensing content. Ipods and Itunes are both capable of using the non-apple formats as well. You just have to change the default. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OTish - RJ45 network cables - OK to use externally? | UK diy | |||
Telephone Network Interface Device (NID) Telephone Box ? | Home Ownership | |||
J 104 NID (Network Interface Device) Telephone Box ? | Home Repair | |||
How to Terminate Network Cables | UK diy | |||
Home network computer/tv/sat/fm/telephone | UK diy |