Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a small (10k gal) inground swimming pool that is probably around 27
y/o. House was built around 1983 and I think it was built then. The plaster has seen better days. I don't think the previous owners took very good care of it. It's pitted, discolored and cracked in a few places. I was watching a movie last night and there was a pool in it that was tiled. I thought that might be a cheaper way of refinishing mine. It would have to be a small mosaic tile that could stand up to the chlorine. The draw back would be all the grout lines that have a tendency to grow algae but if I watched the chemicals closely and diligently cleaned it I might be able to control it. Dumb idea? I think it would look really nice. At least for awhile. Anyone have a fully tiled pool and what are the draw backs? Jim |
#2
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "JimT" wrote in message news ![]() I have a small (10k gal) inground swimming pool that is probably around 27 y/o. House was built around 1983 and I think it was built then. The plaster has seen better days. I don't think the previous owners took very good care of it. It's pitted, discolored and cracked in a few places. I was watching a movie last night and there was a pool in it that was tiled. I thought that might be a cheaper way of refinishing mine. It would have to be a small mosaic tile that could stand up to the chlorine. The draw back would be all the grout lines that have a tendency to grow algae but if I watched the chemicals closely and diligently cleaned it I might be able to control it. Dumb idea? I think it would look really nice. At least for awhile. Anyone have a fully tiled pool and what are the draw backs? Jim William Randolph Hurst had an indoor pool made at San Simeon by craftsman who used lapiz lazuli 1" square tiles that were veined in gold. In that day, many people did not swim, and it was a deep pool, very deep, so the guests would not use it. Instead, it became the help's pool. It took something like 20 guys working 40 hours a week three years to do it. How's your bank book? I had a pool replastered about three or five years ago. They came in at 0700, and at 1400 the next day, started to refill it. $3200, IIRC. Tile has all the things you mention, grout problems, coming loose, plus, it is very difficult to get every piece of tile to stick WITHOUT having any air spaces behind it. That's where gunge is going to form. On a floor, it is hard enough to get a craftsman to grout it correctly so you don't have voids. No matter how you to, tiles come off. I see it all the time on real estate surveys I do. It's put on there sometimes by the best of craftsmen, yet it comes off. Unless you are as rich as Mr. Hearst, I'd suggest you just go plaster. There are, however some absolutely spectacular insets you can have done in the bottoms of pools. You can also get tricky on the sides, and make a plain Jane job really nice. My neighbor did a dolphin on his pool bottom, but he was the best brick and block man I ever saw. Only guy I EVER made wrought iron for without having an opening to measure. He never missed it by more than 1/8". He did all the work for Marnell/Corrao Construction in Las Vegas (sp) on their houses. (LV casino magnates, George a high profile pro stock drag racer for years) Can't say how you'd do in the regular job market. If you ever get a chance to go to San Simeon, GO! There's a tile inset at the front door that came from Pompei. If you're rich enough to do this, please contact me, as you will definitely need a good super, and just so happens, I'm available. Steve visit my blog at http://cabgbypasssurgery.com watch for the book A fool shows his annoyance at once, but a prudent man overlooks an insult. |
#3
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 17:47:56 -0500, "JimT" wrote:
I have a small (10k gal) inground swimming pool that is probably around 27 y/o. House was built around 1983 and I think it was built then. The plaster has seen better days. I don't think the previous owners took very good care of it. It's pitted, discolored and cracked in a few places. I was watching a movie last night and there was a pool in it that was tiled. I thought that might be a cheaper way of refinishing mine. It would have to be a small mosaic tile that could stand up to the chlorine. The draw back would be all the grout lines that have a tendency to grow algae but if I watched the chemicals closely and diligently cleaned it I might be able to control it. Dumb idea? I think it would look really nice. At least for awhile. Anyone have a fully tiled pool and what are the draw backs? Jim I have about the same size pool. I call it the "ole folks pool". Just the bride and me most of the time. The pool is 12 years old. I now have some small/dollar coin size pock-marks in the pool plaster. Even have a rebar rust in one spot. My first thought was to have it Pebble Tech (sp) refinished. For me the cheapest way would be to re plaster (Steve B, Got a local name in LV?). Before you even begin to set tiles for a long lasting finish -- plaster will still need to be taken down, weak plaster removed and other things. Tile would get slippery in that shallow pool. Tile it and it won't add one red dime to resell value. Plaster it. |
#4
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Oren" wrote in message ... On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 17:47:56 -0500, "JimT" wrote: I have a small (10k gal) inground swimming pool that is probably around 27 y/o. House was built around 1983 and I think it was built then. The plaster has seen better days. I don't think the previous owners took very good care of it. It's pitted, discolored and cracked in a few places. I was watching a movie last night and there was a pool in it that was tiled. I thought that might be a cheaper way of refinishing mine. It would have to be a small mosaic tile that could stand up to the chlorine. The draw back would be all the grout lines that have a tendency to grow algae but if I watched the chemicals closely and diligently cleaned it I might be able to control it. Dumb idea? I think it would look really nice. At least for awhile. Anyone have a fully tiled pool and what are the draw backs? Jim I have about the same size pool. I call it the "ole folks pool". Just the bride and me most of the time. The pool is 12 years old. I now have some small/dollar coin size pock-marks in the pool plaster. Even have a rebar rust in one spot. My first thought was to have it Pebble Tech (sp) refinished. For me the cheapest way would be to re plaster (Steve B, Got a local name in LV?). Before you even begin to set tiles for a long lasting finish -- plaster will still need to be taken down, weak plaster removed and other things. Tile would get slippery in that shallow pool. Tile it and it won't add one red dime to resell value. Plaster it. DNC, or something like that. They were in and out, and didn't leave a mess. The job is holding up pretty good, too. Steve visit my blog at http://cabgbypasssurgery.com watch for the book A fool shows his annoyance at once, but a prudent man overlooks an insult. |
#5
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Why not a vinyl lining? |
#6
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 01/07/10 3:47 PM, JimT wrote:
I have a small (10k gal) inground swimming pool that is probably around 27 y/o. House was built around 1983 and I think it was built then. The plaster has seen better days. I don't think the previous owners took very good care of it. It's pitted, discolored and cracked in a few places. I was watching a movie last night and there was a pool in it that was tiled. I thought that might be a cheaper way of refinishing mine. It would have to be a small mosaic tile that could stand up to the chlorine. The draw back would be all the grout lines that have a tendency to grow algae but if I watched the chemicals closely and diligently cleaned it I might be able to control it. Dumb idea? I think it would look really nice. At least for awhile. Anyone have a fully tiled pool and what are the draw backs? Very rare to have fully tiled pools any more, and very expensive and difficult to maintain. Pebbletec or similar surface looks very good and is less prone to algae and calcium problems, but is pretty costly. I had my pool done in Pebbletec about six years ago, I think the pool had never been replastered prior to that, about 20 years since it was built, and it was badly pocked and difficult to keep balanced. Here's my photos of the project: "http://nordicgroup.us/pool/" Remember, after you plaster or tile or Pebbletec, and are filling the pool, always fill the deep end first. |
#7
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "SMS" wrote in message ... On 01/07/10 3:47 PM, JimT wrote: I have a small (10k gal) inground swimming pool that is probably around 27 y/o. House was built around 1983 and I think it was built then. The plaster has seen better days. I don't think the previous owners took very good care of it. It's pitted, discolored and cracked in a few places. I was watching a movie last night and there was a pool in it that was tiled. I thought that might be a cheaper way of refinishing mine. It would have to be a small mosaic tile that could stand up to the chlorine. The draw back would be all the grout lines that have a tendency to grow algae but if I watched the chemicals closely and diligently cleaned it I might be able to control it. Dumb idea? I think it would look really nice. At least for awhile. Anyone have a fully tiled pool and what are the draw backs? Very rare to have fully tiled pools any more, and very expensive and difficult to maintain. Pebbletec or similar surface looks very good and is less prone to algae and calcium problems, but is pretty costly. I had my pool done in Pebbletec about six years ago, I think the pool had never been replastered prior to that, about 20 years since it was built, and it was badly pocked and difficult to keep balanced. Here's my photos of the project: "http://nordicgroup.us/pool/" Remember, after you plaster or tile or Pebbletec, and are filling the pool, always fill the deep end first. My idea is starting to sound pretty dumb to me. My pool isn't hard to maintain now. It's only about 5' deep at the deepest point and a mere 10k gal pool. Yours is much larger. The chlorine and pH are easy to maintain. The dreaded black algae grows in the little pockets and cracks and it's real tough to get out. The mosaic around the edge is in need of replacement tiles that can't be found; of course. I also need a deck overhaul but I'll have to do that. Pebbletec look great but I'm sure it's more than I want to spend. |
#8
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steve B" wrote in message ... "JimT" wrote in message news ![]() I have a small (10k gal) inground swimming pool that is probably around 27 y/o. House was built around 1983 and I think it was built then. The plaster has seen better days. I don't think the previous owners took very good care of it. It's pitted, discolored and cracked in a few places. I was watching a movie last night and there was a pool in it that was tiled. I thought that might be a cheaper way of refinishing mine. It would have to be a small mosaic tile that could stand up to the chlorine. The draw back would be all the grout lines that have a tendency to grow algae but if I watched the chemicals closely and diligently cleaned it I might be able to control it. Dumb idea? I think it would look really nice. At least for awhile. Anyone have a fully tiled pool and what are the draw backs? Jim William Randolph Hurst had an indoor pool made at San Simeon by craftsman who used lapiz lazuli 1" square tiles that were veined in gold. In that day, many people did not swim, and it was a deep pool, very deep, so the guests would not use it. Instead, it became the help's pool. It took something like 20 guys working 40 hours a week three years to do it. How's your bank book? I had a pool replastered about three or five years ago. They came in at 0700, and at 1400 the next day, started to refill it. $3200, IIRC. Tile has all the things you mention, grout problems, coming loose, plus, it is very difficult to get every piece of tile to stick WITHOUT having any air spaces behind it. That's where gunge is going to form. On a floor, it is hard enough to get a craftsman to grout it correctly so you don't have voids. No matter how you to, tiles come off. I see it all the time on real estate surveys I do. It's put on there sometimes by the best of craftsmen, yet it comes off. Unless you are as rich as Mr. Hearst, I'd suggest you just go plaster. There are, however some absolutely spectacular insets you can have done in the bottoms of pools. You can also get tricky on the sides, and make a plain Jane job really nice. My neighbor did a dolphin on his pool bottom, but he was the best brick and block man I ever saw. Only guy I EVER made wrought iron for without having an opening to measure. He never missed it by more than 1/8". He did all the work for Marnell/Corrao Construction in Las Vegas (sp) on their houses. (LV casino magnates, George a high profile pro stock drag racer for years) Can't say how you'd do in the regular job market. If you ever get a chance to go to San Simeon, GO! There's a tile inset at the front door that came from Pompei. If you're rich enough to do this, please contact me, as you will definitely need a good super, and just so happens, I'm available. Steve Thanks for your input and no I'm not in the market for a Super. $3200! You got a great deal or you have a very small pool. g. I heard it cost more like $32,000 to get a pool redone. I could be wrong because I haven't really researched it yet. Sounds like I should. I thought there would be draw backs to tile because you don't see very many tile pools. As I thought, it's beginning to sound like a bad idea. |
#9
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "The Henchman" wrote in message ... Why not a vinyl lining? They do that up north a lot. Out here we don't have to because the ground doesn't freeze solid. I doubt I'd like a vinyl lining but it's something to consider. One of my relatives suggest painting it but I don't know if they make a paint that can hold up to years of chlorine abuse. And when I had to really scrub it down I don't think paint would hold-up. |
#10
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "JimT" wrote in message ... "The Henchman" wrote in message ... Why not a vinyl lining? They do that up north a lot. Out here we don't have to because the ground doesn't freeze solid. I doubt I'd like a vinyl lining but it's something to consider. One of my relatives suggest painting it but I don't know if they make a paint that can hold up to years of chlorine abuse. And when I had to really scrub it down I don't think paint would hold-up. I'm in Canada and my vinyl lining is 25 years old. Inground 16' x 32' pool, 9 feet deep at one end, 3 1/2' deep at shallow end. The vinyl is in great shape. Easy to scrub and vacuum and clean, algae is easy to come off it too after those periods of neglect we all go thru. I always wonder why we used vinyl and in the American south they don't. Now I know. |
#11
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"The Henchman" wrote:
"JimT" wrote in message ... "The Henchman" wrote in message ... Why not a vinyl lining? They do that up north a lot. Out here we don't have to because the ground doesn't freeze solid. I doubt I'd like a vinyl lining but it's something to consider. -snip- I always wonder why we used vinyl and in the American south they don't. Now I know. I suspect the UV load is also a consideration. We [northerners] need more flexibility, in the south they need more UV resistance. Jim |
#12
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 02/07/10 2:32 AM, The Henchman wrote:
"JimT" wrote in message ... "The Henchman" wrote in message ... Why not a vinyl lining? They do that up north a lot. Out here we don't have to because the ground doesn't freeze solid. I doubt I'd like a vinyl lining but it's something to consider. One of my relatives suggest painting it but I don't know if they make a paint that can hold up to years of chlorine abuse. And when I had to really scrub it down I don't think paint would hold-up. I'm in Canada and my vinyl lining is 25 years old. Inground 16' x 32' pool, 9 feet deep at one end, 3 1/2' deep at shallow end. The vinyl is in great shape. Easy to scrub and vacuum and clean, algae is easy to come off it too after those periods of neglect we all go thru. I always wonder why we used vinyl and in the American south they don't. Now I know. Vinyl is unheard of in California as well. |
#13
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 01/07/10 10:44 PM, JimT wrote:
"The Henchman" wrote in message ... Why not a vinyl lining? They do that up north a lot. Out here we don't have to because the ground doesn't freeze solid. I doubt I'd like a vinyl lining but it's something to consider. One of my relatives suggest painting it but I don't know if they make a paint that can hold up to years of chlorine abuse. And when I had to really scrub it down I don't think paint would hold-up. There is paint designed for pools. As long as the surface isn't terrible pitted. You first need to acid wash the pool, then paint it. "http://www.poolcenter.com/painted_pools.htm" |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
In-ground swimming pool question | Home Repair | |||
Swimming pool (daft) question | UK diy | |||
Need help on a swimming pool cleaner question.............. | Home Repair | |||
Swimming Pool opening/closing question | Home Repair | |||
Swimming Pool Pump Question | Home Repair |