Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
digital tv
"Cheri" wrote:
At this time there is nothing needed for Comcast. I have cable directly into the TVs (old TVs) and the local stations ran tests to see if you lost your signal. If you did, you need the converter. It was fine, no change needed. Incorrect information. Comcast, as of this morning, has pulled analog stations between 32 and 71. They say this is due to an "upgrade", and everyone needs to get a converter now. Mind you, there are still a few stations in that range that are coming through, b ut the majority are now replaced by a message telling you to get the convertor box. This is different from the information Comcrap tried to feed us last year, when they told us that we wouldn't need to change anything. The up side to this is that when I called to cancel my cable TV service, they bent over backwards to keep me. As in cutting $35.00 off of my monthly bill, each month, for a year. So, they basically bribed me to go with a digital TV box, which they are paying for. I let them. Jon |
#2
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
digital tv
"Jon Danniken" wrote:
Incorrect information. Comcast, as of this morning, has pulled analog stations between 32 and 71. They say this is due to an "upgrade", and everyone needs to get a converter now. Here is the message they are putting out as of this morning (this is when watching TNT, and a number of other stations (History, AMC, et cetera): http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/606/comcrapij2.jpg Jon |
#3
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
digital tv
"Jon Danniken" wrote in message ... "Cheri" wrote: At this time there is nothing needed for Comcast. I have cable directly into the TVs (old TVs) and the local stations ran tests to see if you lost your signal. If you did, you need the converter. It was fine, no change needed. Incorrect information. Comcast, as of this morning, has pulled analog stations between 32 and 71. They say this is due to an "upgrade", and everyone needs to get a converter now. Mind you, there are still a few stations in that range that are coming through, b ut the majority are now replaced by a message telling you to get the convertor box. This is different from the information Comcrap tried to feed us last year, when they told us that we wouldn't need to change anything. I was under hte impression that cable companies HAD to provide the channels with no converter box. MetroCast is telling us to hook out old TV's to the cable so no box is needed. Seems like Comcast is screwing people. |
#4
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
digital tv
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:42:11 -0800, "Jon Danniken"
wrote: "Jon Danniken" wrote: Incorrect information. Comcast, as of this morning, has pulled analog stations between 32 and 71. They say this is due to an "upgrade", and everyone needs to get a converter now. Here is the message they are putting out as of this morning (this is when watching TNT, and a number of other stations (History, AMC, et cetera): http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/606/comcrapij2.jpg But this isn't the same digital device that I just bought, the one with the 40 dollar cooupon)?????? Jon |
#5
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
digital tv
"mm" wrote in message ... On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:42:11 -0800, "Jon Danniken" wrote: "Jon Danniken" wrote: Incorrect information. Comcast, as of this morning, has pulled analog stations between 32 and 71. They say this is due to an "upgrade", and everyone needs to get a converter now. Here is the message they are putting out as of this morning (this is when watching TNT, and a number of other stations (History, AMC, et cetera): http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/606/comcrapij2.jpg But this isn't the same digital device that I just bought, the one with the 40 dollar cooupon)?????? I wonder if they mean a cable box (not converter), as opposed to hooking directly to the TV? That would make sense. |
#6
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
digital tv
On Feb 12, 5:48*am, "Ed Pawlowski" wrote:
"mm" wrote in message ... On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:42:11 -0800, "Jon Danniken" wrote: "Jon Danniken" wrote: Incorrect information. *Comcast, as of this morning, has pulled analog stations between 32 and 71. *They say this is due to an "upgrade", and everyone needs to get a converter now. Here is the message they are putting out as of this morning (this is when watching TNT, and a number of other stations (History, AMC, et cetera): http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/606/comcrapij2.jpg But this isn't the same digital device that I just bought, the one with the 40 dollar cooupon)?????? I wonder if they mean a cable box (not converter), as opposed to hooking directly to the TV? *That would make sense.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Of course that's what they mean. You don't need the ATSC converters being provided with the $40 coupon for cable. Cable uses QAM for their digital channels. That QAM tuner can either be in the cable box, a cable card, or in the TV. If you use the one in the TV, you will only receive the basic channels that are not scrambled. I'd be curious to know, what is on those channels that the msg come up on? Is it local stations or something else? |
#7
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
digital tv
"Ed Pawlowski" wrote:
I was under hte impression that cable companies HAD to provide the channels with no converter box. MetroCast is telling us to hook out old TV's to the cable so no box is needed. Seems like Comcast is screwing people. I read somewhere (likely here) that they were only required to provide the OTA channels in analog. No validation of that, however. It seems pretty hard to actually pin down reliable information right now. Comcast, last year, ran a commercial for a few months telling people that as long as they were on cable, they didn't have to do anything. Of course, this was innaccurate information, as evidenced by my previous post. Whether they were aware of this information being innaccurate at the time I do now know, but I would be surprised if they didn't. You don't just "upgrade" your entire analog infrastucture to digital on a few month's notice. If that is the case, then they are most certainly "screwing people". Jon |
#8
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
digital tv
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:12:27 -0800, Jon Danniken wrote:
"Ed Pawlowski" wrote: I was under hte impression that cable companies HAD to provide the channels with no converter box. MetroCast is telling us to hook out old TV's to the cable so no box is needed. Seems like Comcast is screwing people. I read somewhere (likely here) that they were only required to provide the OTA channels in analog. No validation of that, however. It seems pretty hard to actually pin down reliable information right now. Comcast, last year, ran a commercial for a few months telling people that as long as they were on cable, they didn't have to do anything. As long as you don't mind renting a cable box for every tv and don't mind losing the ability to record anything unless you have their crappy DVR. |
#9
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
digital tv
"AZ Nomad" wrote:
Jon Danniken wrote: It seems pretty hard to actually pin down reliable information right now. Comcast, last year, ran a commercial for a few months telling people that as long as they were on cable, they didn't have to do anything. As long as you don't mind renting a cable box for every tv and don't mind losing the ability to record anything unless you have their crappy DVR. Exactly. They said, "cable subscribers don't need to do anything". Now they say, "cable subscribers need to get our digital device". My suspicions are that they knew the first bit was bull****, and only said it to lull people into a false sense of security so that they would not consider jumping ship. Jon |
#10
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
digital tv
wrote :
"Jon Danniken" wrote: Here is the message they are putting out as of this morning (this is when watching TNT, and a number of other stations (History, AMC, et cetera): I'd be curious to know, what is on those channels that the msg come up on? Is it local stations or something else? Try reading for comprehension. Jon |
#11
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
digital tv
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:27:01 -0800, Jon Danniken wrote:
"AZ Nomad" wrote: Jon Danniken wrote: It seems pretty hard to actually pin down reliable information right now. Comcast, last year, ran a commercial for a few months telling people that as long as they were on cable, they didn't have to do anything. As long as you don't mind renting a cable box for every tv and don't mind losing the ability to record anything unless you have their crappy DVR. Exactly. They said, "cable subscribers don't need to do anything". Now they say, "cable subscribers need to get our digital device". My suspicions are that they knew the first bit was bull****, and only said it to lull people into a false sense of security so that they would not consider jumping ship. Every month I get closer to dumping cable tv. There are a few channels that I record off of analog tv and if they are switched to encrypted digital like all the HD channels not available off the air, then I'll dump them for sure. I watch tv when *I* want to not when the program is airing a particular show and that means that I timeshift just about everything I watch. If I can't record it, I don't want to watch it. TV commercials have become too ****ing obnoxious for me to tolerate them any more. I have a very nice mythtv setup and don't want their crappy DVR. The channels that I can record off of digital TV are all available OTA. What is the point of paying for cable if it offers nothing extra that I want? |
#12
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
digital tv
Jon Danniken wrote:
"Ed Pawlowski" wrote: I was under hte impression that cable companies HAD to provide the channels with no converter box. MetroCast is telling us to hook out old TV's to the cable so no box is needed. Seems like Comcast is screwing people. I read somewhere (likely here) that they were only required to provide the OTA channels in analog. No validation of that, however. They are only required to provide OTA channels unecrypted. They aren't required to do anything with analog regarding keeping it up or not. They have to decide if turning off analog channels is a good business plan or not since it would require users to do something. In the case of cable the user would need to get a converter box or a new TV. So the user just might decide to move to a satellite provider since they are forced into doing something. A nearby regional cable provider is doing extensive advertising right now to attract such users: "get local channels on our cable for $10/month, no converter box and everything will be the same" It seems pretty hard to actually pin down reliable information right now. Comcast, last year, ran a commercial for a few months telling people that as long as they were on cable, they didn't have to do anything. Of course, this was innaccurate information, as evidenced by my previous post. Whether they were aware of this information being innaccurate at the time I do now know, but I would be surprised if they didn't. You don't just "upgrade" your entire analog infrastucture to digital on a few month's notice. If that is the case, then they are most certainly "screwing people". Jon |
#13
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
digital tv
Jon Danniken wrote:
"AZ Nomad" wrote: Jon Danniken wrote: It seems pretty hard to actually pin down reliable information right now. Comcast, last year, ran a commercial for a few months telling people that as long as they were on cable, they didn't have to do anything. As long as you don't mind renting a cable box for every tv and don't mind losing the ability to record anything unless you have their crappy DVR. Exactly. They said, "cable subscribers don't need to do anything". Now they say, "cable subscribers need to get our digital device". My suspicions are that they knew the first bit was bull****, and only said it to lull people into a false sense of security so that they would not consider jumping ship. Jon No surprise with Comcast. They tried to completely turn off analog in Chicago last year claiming the "government required them to do it". We used to have Adelphia and Comcast bought the part that includes our area. The first thing they did was to drop existing analog channels and carry them as digital only. In some areas they are now dropping 1/2 of the analog to force people into getting converter boxes. |
#14
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
digital tv
"Jon Danniken" wrote:
I read somewhere (likely here) that they were only required to provide the OTA channels in analog. No validation of that, however. "The 1992 Cable Act is very clear," said FCC spokeswoman Mary Diamond in a statement. "Cable operators must ensure that all local broadcast stations carried pursuant to this Act are 'viewable' by all cable subscribers. But that requirement can be met by handing out cable boxes for free, transmitting in clear QAM, or transmitting analog clear. |
#15
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
digital tv
On Feb 12, 11:29*am, "Jon Danniken"
wrote: wrote : *"Jon Danniken" wrote: Here is the message they are putting out as of this morning (this is when watching TNT, and a number of other stations (History, AMC, et cetera): I'd be curious to know, what is on those channels that the msg come up on? * Is it local stations or something else? Try reading for comprehension. Jon Try reading what you posted. You said Comcast has pulled "analog stations" between 32 and 71. That is what lead to the confusion. They are not stations, which would imply that they were actual broadcast stations. They are cable channels. No need to start getting nasty. |
#16
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
digital tv
On Feb 12, 11:27*am, "Jon Danniken"
wrote: "AZ Nomad" wrote: *Jon Danniken wrote: It seems pretty hard to actually pin down reliable information right now. Comcast, last year, ran a commercial for a few months telling people that as long as they were on cable, they didn't have to do anything. As long as you don't mind renting a cable box for every tv and don't mind losing the ability to record anything unless you have their crappy DVR. Exactly. *They said, "cable subscribers don't need to do anything". *Now they say, "cable subscribers need to get our digital device". What they mean is that cable subscribers don't need to do anything specific to the transition to DTV broadcasting of the local STATIONS. Which I believe is true. Cablevision has conveyed the same message. Cablevision like most other cable companies has been gradually shifting to digital transmission of more channels. And as they do that, channels that were transmitted as analog now need either a digital cable box or cable card to receive. That has been going on here for several years. And that is the message you are seeing regarding AMC, History Channel, etc. Those are cable channels and have nothing to do with the DTV broadcast transition. If you didn't have a digital cable box or cable card, you got that message on Cablevision a couple years ago. My suspicions are that they knew the first bit was bull****, and only said it to lull people into a false sense of security so that they would not consider jumping ship. Jon |
#17
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
digital tv
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:50:44 -0700, Robert Neville wrote:
"Jon Danniken" wrote: I read somewhere (likely here) that they were only required to provide the OTA channels in analog. No validation of that, however. "The 1992 Cable Act is very clear," said FCC spokeswoman Mary Diamond in a statement. "Cable operators must ensure that all local broadcast stations carried pursuant to this Act are 'viewable' by all cable subscribers. But that requirement can be met by handing out cable boxes for free, transmitting in clear QAM, or transmitting analog clear. Does that cable act say anything about handing out cable boxes for free? |
#18
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
digital tv
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:38:56 -0600, AZ Nomad
wrote: On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:27:01 -0800, Jon Danniken wrote: "AZ Nomad" wrote: Jon Danniken wrote: It seems pretty hard to actually pin down reliable information right now. Comcast, last year, ran a commercial for a few months telling people that as long as they were on cable, they didn't have to do anything. As long as you don't mind renting a cable box for every tv and don't mind losing the ability to record anything unless you have their crappy DVR. Exactly. They said, "cable subscribers don't need to do anything". Now they say, "cable subscribers need to get our digital device". My suspicions are that they knew the first bit was bull****, and only said it to lull people into a false sense of security so that they would not consider jumping ship. Every month I get closer to dumping cable tv. There are a few channels that I record off of analog tv and if they are switched to encrypted digital like all the HD channels not available off the air, then I'll dump them for sure. I watch tv when *I* want to not when the program is airing a particular show and that means that I timeshift just about everything I watch. If I can't record it, I don't want to watch it. TV commercials have become too ****ing obnoxious for me to tolerate them any more. I have a very nice mythtv setup and don't want their crappy DVR. The channels that I can record off of digital TV are all available OTA. What is the point of paying for cable if it offers nothing extra that I want? How many $1 movies from Redbox would I have to watch to match Comcast's monthly charge? Maybe not a fair comparison, but gives you an idea about value. Cable has too much commercial time (no wonder people are fat and broke), too much censorship for my liking and if you watch for more than 6 months, it's the same crap over and over again. I schedule my favorite programs to record local programs with a PC tuner card, then play back skipping commercials with no DVR service fees. I watch SNL in 45 minutes or less, at my convenience. A good tuner card runs about $100, better at recording than the el cheapo tuners. After I dumped Comcast, I saved money, plus made a PBS donation. |
#19
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
digital tv
On Feb 11, 10:50*pm, mm wrote:
But this isn't the same digital device that I just bought, the one with the 40 dollar cooupon)?????? No. Notice they call it a "digital device" not a "converter box." Converter box is for ANTENNA. Digital device is for CABLE. You get the converter box with your coupon. The cable company provides the digital device. |
#20
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
digital tv
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:47:46 -0500, Phisherman wrote:
How many $1 movies from Redbox would I have to watch to match Comcast's monthly charge? Maybe not a fair comparison, but gives you an idea about value. Cable has too much commercial time (no wonder people are fat and broke), too much censorship for my liking and if you watch for more than 6 months, it's the same crap over and over again. I schedule my favorite programs to record local programs with a PC tuner card, then play back skipping commercials with no DVR service fees. I watch SNL in 45 minutes or less, at my convenience. A good tuner card runs about $100, better at recording than the el cheapo tuners. After I dumped Comcast, I saved money, plus made a PBS donation. There's some stuff I record off of the history channel, comedy central, travel channel, TNT, etc. that I can't get off the air. That's about all I'm keeping cable for. If cox moves them to encrypted digital, then I'm dumping them. |
#21
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
digital tv
AZ Nomad wrote:
Does that cable act say anything about handing out cable boxes for free? Of course not. It's up to the cable company to decide how to comply with the requirement. |
#22
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
digital tv
"Robert Neville" wrote:
"Jon Danniken" wrote: I read somewhere (likely here) that they were only required to provide the OTA channels in analog. No validation of that, however. "The 1992 Cable Act is very clear," said FCC spokeswoman Mary Diamond in a statement. "Cable operators must ensure that all local broadcast stations carried pursuant to this Act are 'viewable' by all cable subscribers. But that requirement can be met by handing out cable boxes for free, transmitting in clear QAM, or transmitting analog clear. So *that's* the deal; it just applies to the locals Thanks for the information, Robert, it is appreciated. Jon |
#23
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
digital tv
"George" wrote:
No surprise with Comcast. They tried to completely turn off analog in Chicago last year claiming the "government required them to do it". We used to have Adelphia and Comcast bought the part that includes our area. The first thing they did was to drop existing analog channels and carry them as digital only. In some areas they are now dropping 1/2 of the analog to force people into getting converter boxes. The more I understand Comcast, the more I am coming to understand that they are primarily a marketing company. The rest of their business, TV, cable internet, and phone, are nothing more than features to support the marketing. Jon |
#24
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
digital tv
Robert Neville wrote:
AZ Nomad wrote: Does that cable act say anything about handing out cable boxes for free? Of course not. It's up to the cable company to decide how to comply with the requirement. The Cable Bill says that the local channels have to be available to all _subscribers_, not to anybody who manages to tap into the cable somehow. If one needs a cable box to view the service, then any _subscriber_ will have one. But this has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with what was required to happen on the 17th and which Obama has put back to June. That affects over the air broadcasters whose signal you recieve with an antenna, it has no effect at all on cable. -- -- --John to email, dial "usenet" and validate (was jclarke at eye bee em dot net) |
#26
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
digital tv
"J. Clarke" wrote in message
... But this has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with what was required to happen on the 17th and which Obama has put back to June. That affects over the air broadcasters whose signal you recieve with an antenna, it has no effect at all on cable. The newspaper today said that some broadcasters are going ahead with the Feb 17th date. Cheri |
#27
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
digital tv
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:22:51 -0600, AZ Nomad
wrote: On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:12:27 -0800, Jon Danniken wrote: "Ed Pawlowski" wrote: I was under hte impression that cable companies HAD to provide the channels with no converter box. MetroCast is telling us to hook out old TV's to the cable so no box is needed. Seems like Comcast is screwing people. I read somewhere (likely here) that they were only required to provide the OTA channels in analog. No validation of that, however. It seems pretty hard to actually pin down reliable information right now. Comcast, last year, ran a commercial for a few months telling people that as long as they were on cable, they didn't have to do anything. As long as you don't mind renting a cable box for every tv and don't mind losing the ability to record anything unless you have their crappy DVR. My DVR (ReplayTV 5xxx) works fine with my digital cable box (Motorola). -- Mark Lloyd http://notstupid.laughingsquid.com "The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion." |
#28
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
digital tv
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:18:11 -0800, "Cheri"
wrote: "J. Clarke" wrote in message ... But this has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with what was required to happen on the 17th and which Obama has put back to June. That affects over the air broadcasters whose signal you recieve with an antenna, it has no effect at all on cable. The newspaper today said that some broadcasters are going ahead with the Feb 17th date. Cheri The site at https://www.dtv2009.gov/ has a list of channels, but it's not in a standard format. BTW, that site is currently NOT showing the countdown (of days until the transition). -- Mark Lloyd http://notstupid.laughingsquid.com "The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion." |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Digital SLR Cameras- Compare n Buy Digital SLR Camera | Electronics | |||
Digital SLR Cameras- Compare n Buy Digital SLR Camera | Electronics Repair | |||
Digital Camera : Know more about digital cameras | Electronics Repair | |||
Digital out from a CD player with no digital out? | Electronics Repair |