On Sun, 7 Dec 2008 18:41:52 -0600, "crosstar"
wrote:

BACKLASH QUO VADIS

Richard Barrett

News-outlets around the country have been reporting on the "backlash"
against "Obamanation". I have been quoted, numerous times, saying
that the raising of the flag of the "Republic of New Africa" over the
White House would be considered, by many, as an "act of war," which
would so polarize the nation as to bring about a complete turnabout.
"Obamanation" would wind up, ironically, catapulting the majority
over the minorities and democracy over tyranny. But, "quo vadis"? How
will it happen? "Backlash" has, already, been characterized, by some,
as mere handfuls of disgruntled electors or, even, of psychos, bent
on re-enacting some sort of bizarre "B-movie."

With the elevation of Barack Obama, however, "all bets are
off," so far as Obamans predicting the ultimate outcome. The
political-cauldron has simply boiled over, so intensely as to scorch
the very process which has allowed for an orderly state-of-affairs,
up to this point. My own appeal has been for peaceful solutions,
ousting "Omanamation" through impeachment, resignation or attrition.
But, sentiment, such as the "Black Hand" in Serbia and the
"Republican Army" in Ireland, is notorious for not listening. One
newspaper even accused me of being a "moderate," for not calling for
assassination. Instead, I summon protest, pressure and defiance,
peacefully.

However, with the economic-system in collapse and the
social-structure in ruins, the bottom falling out will generate disorder.
The "race-war" against Americans by Negroes has been going on
since the Civil Rights Bill, forcing Americans to move away from
cities and slums. However, the backlash is only now erupting through
riots in prisons, civil-disobedience in schools and desertion in the
military. Bringing order out of such chaos must be the priority for
the New America, but organizing the clamor is the key to success.
This means that emerging backlash-spokesmen must attract sufficient
attention, to draw support, but, also, reflect discernment, to avoid
hotheadedness.

It is not necessary to sport outlandish attire, provocative grimaces
or vulgar language. A clear message, stout-hearted posture and
personal charisma will suffice. It is counter-productive to woo the
people to phantom groups, imaginary numbers and vaunted promises.
The objective must be to raise the level of resentment and channel
energy down productive avenues, such as speaking, running for
office, broadcasting, publishing and writing. Not to say that the
flood-waters of backlash will not overflow their banks, but the
yeoman engineering-feat is now to keep the waterway of social-change
confined within the bounds of ostracism, without spilling over into
anarchy.

There could be such occurrences as general strikes or boycotts, where
the masses simply refuse to cooperate in their own destruction. There
will be the more personal offensives, where Americans refuse to buy
from minorities, truck with aliens or even speak to Obamans. Such
a great "silence" will, in and of itself, speak louder than any clash
on the streets. Civil-disobedience is bound to take place and is
perfectly proper, provided that it does not go over-the-top, in terms
of repelling, rather than attracting, public-sentiment. Some will
suffer injury, be jailed and be martyred, but the upheaval will begin
remaking the nation and, even, the world, all over again.

To unsubscribe from Crosstarlist:
http://www.nationalist.org/contact/unsubscribe.php

To subscribe to Crosstarlist:
http://www.nationalist.org/contact/subscribe.php

To comment on Crosstarlist:
http://www.nationalist.org/contact/comment.php

To read this article on the Crosstar website:
http://www.nationalist.org/freetip/2008/120701.html

To listen to this piece through Crosstar audio:
http://www.nationalist.org/news/pod/pod.mp3

Crosstarlist
Trademark/service of nationalist.org
Not necessarily Crosstarlist views
Copyright 2008 The Nationalist Movement

Sorry if OT, but is such a worthy article it deserves
forwarding to one and all.

ted

Sorry if OT, but is such a worthy article it deserves
forwarding to one and all.

ted



No it doesn't. Nothing deserves spamming to a bunch of unrelated
newsgroups. Take the off topic junk offline, if you feel the need to
pass it around, then forward it to your own contacts, not in an
unrelated public forum. There are plenty of newsgroups devoted to this
sort of thing and this is not one of them.

On Dec 9, 8:29*pm, wrote:
On Sun, 7 Dec 2008 18:41:52 -0600, "crosstar"

The "race-war" against Americans by Negroes has been going on

Sorry if OT, but is such a worthy article it deserves
forwarding to one and all.

No, it's not worthy. No, it does not deserve to be forwarded to
anybody. And "Negroes" ARE Americans, asshole.

Cindy Hamilton, obvious negrophile, whined:

No, it's not worthy. No, it does not deserve to be forwarded to
anybody. And "Negroes" ARE Americans, asshole.

And really, who would know more about "assholes" than you?