Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've struggled with this for the last forty years.
I want to hang something on a drywall wall, and I want to use the studs instead of drywall anchors. I have the damndest time finding the studs reliably. There's the time-honored and lo-tech method of tapping on the wall and listening for different tones of hollow wall vs solid stud. So, I find a stud that way, then measure 16" (or 24") on either side, tap there, and hear a hollow sound. At that point, the process becomes random and seldom 100% accurate. I have several electronic detectors and their performance is spotty as well. I can scan the same spot three or four times and get three or four different hits over a space of about four inches, too wide to be a single 2x2. (No, I'm not finding a doubled stud.) The most reliable gadget I have is also the simplest: a small plastic horseshoe with a magnetic pointer suspended between the open ends. You move it over the wall until the pointer moves, at which time you know you have detected a nail head and are on a stud. The problem with that is that nail heads are a very small area of a wall and it takes a lot of systematic scanning to find them. I invariably end up approximating where I think the studs are, then punching trial holes with an awl. This leaves me patching lots of little trial holes when I'm done. Any suggestions? |
#2
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Evans" wrote in message ... I've struggled with this for the last forty years. I want to hang something on a drywall wall, and I want to use the studs instead of drywall anchors. I have the damndest time finding the studs reliably. There's the time-honored and lo-tech method of tapping on the wall and listening for different tones of hollow wall vs solid stud. So, I find a stud that way, then measure 16" (or 24") on either side, tap there, and hear a hollow sound. At that point, the process becomes random and seldom 100% accurate. I have several electronic detectors and their performance is spotty as well. I can scan the same spot three or four times and get three or four different hits over a space of about four inches, too wide to be a single 2x2. (No, I'm not finding a doubled stud.) The most reliable gadget I have is also the simplest: a small plastic horseshoe with a magnetic pointer suspended between the open ends. You move it over the wall until the pointer moves, at which time you know you have detected a nail head and are on a stud. The problem with that is that nail heads are a very small area of a wall and it takes a lot of systematic scanning to find them. I invariably end up approximating where I think the studs are, then punching trial holes with an awl. This leaves me patching lots of little trial holes when I'm done. Any suggestions? get a bunch of small supermagnets. you can get them for about .10/each when you buy in bulk (i use http://www.forcefieldmagnets.com/cat...roducts_id=37). run a stack over where you think the stud is and they'll be attracted to the drywall screws. put a small magnet over each screwhead. you'll see exactly where the studs run. |
#3
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Richard Evans wrote: I've struggled with this for the last forty years. I want to hang something on a drywall wall, and I want to use the studs instead of drywall anchors. I have the damndest time finding the studs reliably. There's the time-honored and lo-tech method of tapping on the wall and listening for different tones of hollow wall vs solid stud. So, I find a stud that way, then measure 16" (or 24") on either side, tap there, and hear a hollow sound. At that point, the process becomes random and seldom 100% accurate. I have several electronic detectors and their performance is spotty as well. I can scan the same spot three or four times and get three or four different hits over a space of about four inches, too wide to be a single 2x2. (No, I'm not finding a doubled stud.) The most reliable gadget I have is also the simplest: a small plastic horseshoe with a magnetic pointer suspended between the open ends. You move it over the wall until the pointer moves, at which time you know you have detected a nail head and are on a stud. The problem with that is that nail heads are a very small area of a wall and it takes a lot of systematic scanning to find them. I invariably end up approximating where I think the studs are, then punching trial holes with an awl. This leaves me patching lots of little trial holes when I'm done. Any suggestions? The $20 wall density detector I got from Radio Shack 20 years ago works very reliably in my hands. When I loan it out, it doesn't. Seems it all comes down to reading, and following, the instructions. It's simple to use, but easy to use wrong. |
#4
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Smitty Two" wrote in message
news ![]() In article , Richard Evans wrote: I've struggled with this for the last forty years. I want to hang something on a drywall wall, and I want to use the studs instead of drywall anchors. I have the damndest time finding the studs reliably. There's the time-honored and lo-tech method of tapping on the wall and listening for different tones of hollow wall vs solid stud. So, I find a stud that way, then measure 16" (or 24") on either side, tap there, and hear a hollow sound. At that point, the process becomes random and seldom 100% accurate. I have several electronic detectors and their performance is spotty as well. I can scan the same spot three or four times and get three or four different hits over a space of about four inches, too wide to be a single 2x2. (No, I'm not finding a doubled stud.) The most reliable gadget I have is also the simplest: a small plastic horseshoe with a magnetic pointer suspended between the open ends. You move it over the wall until the pointer moves, at which time you know you have detected a nail head and are on a stud. The problem with that is that nail heads are a very small area of a wall and it takes a lot of systematic scanning to find them. I invariably end up approximating where I think the studs are, then punching trial holes with an awl. This leaves me patching lots of little trial holes when I'm done. Any suggestions? The $20 wall density detector I got from Radio Shack 20 years ago works very reliably in my hands. When I loan it out, it doesn't. Seems it all comes down to reading, and following, the instructions. It's simple to use, but easy to use wrong. Similar experience here. I've got a $20 one I got at Sears maybe 25 years ago and it works fine for me...always finds the stud. My wife insists that she can put on her Sarah Palin lipstick and has no trouble finding all the studs she wants.... |
#5
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Similar experience here. I've got a $20 one I got at Sears maybe 25 years ago and it works fine for me...always finds the stud. My wife insists that she can put on her Sarah Palin lipstick and has no trouble finding all the studs she wants.... You betcha! |
#6
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 12:12:10 -0400, Richard Evans wrote:
I've struggled with this for the last forty years. I want to hang something on a drywall wall, and I want to use the studs instead of drywall anchors. I have the damndest time finding the studs reliably. There's the time-honored and lo-tech method of tapping on the wall and listening for different tones of hollow wall vs solid stud. So, I find a stud that way, then measure 16" (or 24") on either side, tap there, and hear a hollow sound. At that point, the process becomes random and seldom 100% accurate. I have several electronic detectors and their performance is spotty as well. I can scan the same spot three or four times and get three or four different hits over a space of about four inches, too wide to be a single 2x2. (No, I'm not finding a doubled stud.) The most reliable gadget I have is also the simplest: a small plastic horseshoe with a magnetic pointer suspended between the open ends. You move it over the wall until the pointer moves, at which time you know you have detected a nail head and are on a stud. The problem with that is that nail heads are a very small area of a wall and it takes a lot of systematic scanning to find them. I invariably end up approximating where I think the studs are, then punching trial holes with an awl. This leaves me patching lots of little trial holes when I'm done. Any suggestions? I've had good luck with the electronic variety. The trick is to move them very slowly along the wall. The LEDs will shoot up at one boundary and down at the other boundary. I don't move more than about a centimeter per second once I know the general location. |
#7
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Evans wrote:
.... Any suggestions? I basically start w/ the baseboard and find where it was nailed. Investigation there generally will find the pattern. -- |
#8
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 3, 2:39*pm, dpb wrote:
Richard Evans wrote: ... Any suggestions? I basically start w/ the baseboard and find where it was nailed. Investigation there generally will find the pattern. -- A very powerful magnet (about size of end of one thumb) can be scrapped out of an older style hard drive. These are are so strong that two will attract and hold through a two inch diameter tree sapling! One of these can be gently moved over a plasterboard wall and will hold 'themselves' in place wherever there is a nail or a screw. It's like the old expression; "If your underpants fall down use stronger elastic". In this case a 'stronger magnet'! Also noticed that one way to determine if there is an electric current actually flowing in wires (there has to be something plugged in and/or switched on for current to flow) is to hold one of these magnets close the wiring and vibration will be felt due to the 60 hertz alternation of current through the wires. This works even though the two wires carrying current, live and neutral, are close together, or even twisted. One amusing sidelight; is that someone was using one of these strong magnets on the end of a piece of string, to retrieve something but avoid moving a heavy metal filing cabinet. The magnet swung slightly and was attracted to the filing cabinet; where it stuck like glue. Don't know if they then moved the cabinet anyway or just abandoned the magnet until some future time! |
#9
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 3, 11:12*am, Richard Evans wrote:
I've struggled with this for the last forty years. I want to hang something on a drywall wall, and I want to use the studs instead of drywall anchors. I have the damndest time finding the studs reliably. There's the time-honored and lo-tech method of tapping on the wall and listening for different tones of hollow wall vs solid stud. So, I find a stud that way, then measure 16" (or 24") on either side, tap there, and hear a hollow sound. At that point, the process becomes random and seldom 100% accurate. I have several electronic detectors and their performance is spotty as well. I can scan the same spot three or four times and get three or four different hits over a space of about four inches, too wide to be a single 2x2. (No, I'm not finding a doubled stud.) The most reliable gadget I have is also the simplest: a small plastic horseshoe with a magnetic pointer suspended between the open ends. You move it over the wall until the pointer moves, at which time you know you have detected a nail head and are on a stud. The problem with that is that nail heads are a very small area of a wall and it takes a lot of systematic scanning to find them. I invariably end up approximating where I think the studs are, then punching trial holes with an awl. This leaves me patching lots of little trial holes when I'm done. Any suggestions? I have had good success with electronic stud finders, but I agree that the results can be spotty. You can get small, very powerful magnets on ebay, that you "rub" over a wall section until it sticks to a screw. It's a little faster than the horseshoe tool, because they will "home in" on a screw from about 2-3" away from it. Once you have found one, it is easier to locate the next ones based on a typical framing pattern. JK |
#10
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 12:12:10 -0400, Richard Evans
wrote: I've struggled with this for the last forty years. I want to hang something on a drywall wall, and I want to use the studs instead of drywall anchors. I have the damndest time finding the studs reliably. There's the time-honored and lo-tech method of tapping on the wall and listening for different tones of hollow wall vs solid stud. So, I find a stud that way, then measure 16" (or 24") on either side, tap there, and hear a hollow sound. At that point, the process becomes random and seldom 100% accurate. I have several electronic detectors and their performance is spotty as well. I can scan the same spot three or four times and get three or four different hits over a space of about four inches, too wide to be a single 2x2. (No, I'm not finding a doubled stud.) The most reliable gadget I have is also the simplest: a small plastic horseshoe with a magnetic pointer suspended between the open ends. You move it over the wall until the pointer moves, at which time you know you have detected a nail head and are on a stud. The problem with that is that nail heads are a very small area of a wall and it takes a lot of systematic scanning to find them. I invariably end up approximating where I think the studs are, then punching trial holes with an awl. This leaves me patching lots of little trial holes when I'm done. Any suggestions? Rare-Earth magnets. You might find them in a hobby shop or Rad Shack. Even old dead hard drives have magnets for salvage. http://www.rare-earth-magnets.com/magnets.htm I've not used this tool, but it uses magnets. http://www.magicstudfinder.com/howitworks.html |
#11
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oren wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 12:12:10 -0400, Richard Evans wrote: I've struggled with this for the last forty years. I want to hang something on a drywall wall, and I want to use the studs instead of drywall anchors. I have the damndest time finding the studs reliably. There's the time-honored and lo-tech method of tapping on the wall and listening for different tones of hollow wall vs solid stud. So, I find a stud that way, then measure 16" (or 24") on either side, tap there, and hear a hollow sound. At that point, the process becomes random and seldom 100% accurate. I have several electronic detectors and their performance is spotty as well. I can scan the same spot three or four times and get three or four different hits over a space of about four inches, too wide to be a single 2x2. (No, I'm not finding a doubled stud.) The most reliable gadget I have is also the simplest: a small plastic horseshoe with a magnetic pointer suspended between the open ends. You move it over the wall until the pointer moves, at which time you know you have detected a nail head and are on a stud. The problem with that is that nail heads are a very small area of a wall and it takes a lot of systematic scanning to find them. I invariably end up approximating where I think the studs are, then punching trial holes with an awl. This leaves me patching lots of little trial holes when I'm done. Any suggestions? Rare-Earth magnets. You might find them in a hobby shop or Rad Shack. Even old dead hard drives have magnets for salvage. http://www.rare-earth-magnets.com/magnets.htm I've not used this tool, but it uses magnets. http://www.magicstudfinder.com/howitworks.html There is a reason to not use aluminum nails. |
#12
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/3/2008 9:12 AM Richard Evans spake thus:
I've struggled with this for the last forty years. I want to hang something on a drywall wall, and I want to use the studs instead of drywall anchors. I have the damndest time finding the studs reliably. There's the time-honored and lo-tech method of tapping on the wall and listening for different tones of hollow wall vs solid stud. So, I find a stud that way, then measure 16" (or 24") on either side, tap there, and hear a hollow sound. At that point, the process becomes random and seldom 100% accurate. I have several electronic detectors and their performance is spotty as well. I can scan the same spot three or four times and get three or four different hits over a space of about four inches, too wide to be a single 2x2. (No, I'm not finding a doubled stud.) The most reliable gadget I have is also the simplest: a small plastic horseshoe with a magnetic pointer suspended between the open ends. You move it over the wall until the pointer moves, at which time you know you have detected a nail head and are on a stud. The problem with that is that nail heads are a very small area of a wall and it takes a lot of systematic scanning to find them. As others have suggested, forget the electronic detectors. Get yourself a simple, cheap mechanical/magnetic stud finder. Mine, made by Stanley, has a small powerful magnet suspended on a pivot. It's very sensitive and clearly swings when over a screw or nail (ferrous, of course). -- Washing one's hands of the conflict between the powerful and the powerless means to side with the powerful, not to be neutral. - Paulo Freire |
#13
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 10:36:13 -0700, David Nebenzahl
wrote: As others have suggested, forget the electronic detectors. Get yourself a simple, cheap mechanical/magnetic stud finder. Mine, made by Stanley, has a small powerful magnet suspended on a pivot. It's very sensitive and clearly swings when over a screw or nail (ferrous, of course). grin http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/...500_AA200_.jpg |
#14
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/3/2008 11:22 AM Oren spake thus:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 10:36:13 -0700, David Nebenzahl wrote: As others have suggested, forget the electronic detectors. Get yourself a simple, cheap mechanical/magnetic stud finder. Mine, made by Stanley, has a small powerful magnet suspended on a pivot. It's very sensitive and clearly swings when over a screw or nail (ferrous, of course). grin http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/...500_AA200_.jpg That's what I'm talking 'bout. Of course, when I bought mine, the first thing that happened is that the clear plastic cover popped off. Little super glue fixed that right up, though. -- Washing one's hands of the conflict between the powerful and the powerless means to side with the powerful, not to be neutral. - Paulo Freire |
#15
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 12:12:10 -0400, Richard Evans
wrote: I've struggled with this for the last forty years. I want to hang something on a drywall wall, and I want to use the studs instead of drywall anchors. I have the damndest time finding the studs reliably. -snip- Since I started using threaded drywall anchors [Zip it or E-Z] I don't care where the stud is. I drive a screw and if it hits a stud I'm happy. If it doesn't, I drive one of these in the same hole and drive the screw into it. Haven't had one fail yet. [I have had a plastic one catch the side of a stud and break. Backed it out & now I use the metal ones.] Jim |
#16
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 3, 11:36*am, Jim Elbrecht wrote:
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 12:12:10 -0400, Richard Evans wrote: I've struggled with this for the last forty years. I want to hang something on a drywall wall, and I want to use the studs instead of drywall anchors. I have the damndest time finding the studs reliably. -snip- Since I started using threaded drywall anchors [Zip it or E-Z] I don't care where the stud is. * I drive a screw and if it hits a stud I'm happy. *If it doesn't, I drive one of these in the same hole and drive the screw into it. Haven't had one fail yet. *[I have had a plastic one catch the side of a stud and break. *Backed it out & now I use the metal ones.] Jim Um, as long as you mind the load limits. There are situations where you MUST find a stud. A heavy wall cabinet is not going to be safely supported by drywall anchors. |
#17
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
mike wrote:
-snip- Since I started using threaded drywall anchors [Zip it or E-Z] I don't care where the stud is. * -snip- Um, as long as you mind the load limits. There are situations where you MUST find a stud. A heavy wall cabinet is not going to be safely supported by drywall anchors. Yup- always use a big enough anchor. I'd probably go for a french cleat for cabinets, though. Glued and screwed to drywall/anchors/studs. Jim |
#18
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 3, 9:12*am, Richard Evans wrote:
Any suggestions? Yeah, there are plenty of crappy electronic studfinders that end up causing more harm than good. There are also good ones. Zircon tends to make good ones. Don't skimp on cost. A good studfinder pays for itself in eliminated mistakes in no time. A metal detector feature is good, but be sure to use some care so you don't attempt to drive a nail though, say, a cast iron drain pipe. ![]() |
#19
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Evans wrote:
I've struggled with this for the last forty years. I want to hang something on a drywall wall, and I want to use the studs instead of drywall anchors. I have the damndest time finding the studs reliably. There's the time-honored and lo-tech method of tapping on the wall and listening for different tones of hollow wall vs solid stud. So, I find a stud that way, then measure 16" (or 24") on either side, tap there, and hear a hollow sound. At that point, the process becomes random and seldom 100% accurate. I have several electronic detectors and their performance is spotty as well. I can scan the same spot three or four times and get three or four different hits over a space of about four inches, too wide to be a single 2x2. (No, I'm not finding a doubled stud.) The most reliable gadget I have is also the simplest: a small plastic horseshoe with a magnetic pointer suspended between the open ends. You move it over the wall until the pointer moves, at which time you know you have detected a nail head and are on a stud. The problem with that is that nail heads are a very small area of a wall and it takes a lot of systematic scanning to find them. I invariably end up approximating where I think the studs are, then punching trial holes with an awl. This leaves me patching lots of little trial holes when I'm done. Any suggestions? Hire Superman for an hour....G Jeff -- Jeffry Wisnia (W1BSV + Brass Rat '57 EE) The speed of light is 1.8*10^12 furlongs per fortnight. |
#20
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Evans" wrote in message ... I've struggled with this for the last forty years. I want to hang something on a drywall wall, and I want to use the studs instead of drywall anchors. I have the damndest time finding the studs reliably. There's the time-honored and lo-tech method of tapping on the wall and listening for different tones of hollow wall vs solid stud. So, I find a stud that way, then measure 16" (or 24") on either side, tap there, and hear a hollow sound. At that point, the process becomes random and seldom 100% accurate. I have several electronic detectors and their performance is spotty as well. I can scan the same spot three or four times and get three or four different hits over a space of about four inches, too wide to be a single 2x2. (No, I'm not finding a doubled stud.) The most reliable gadget I have is also the simplest: a small plastic horseshoe with a magnetic pointer suspended between the open ends. You move it over the wall until the pointer moves, at which time you know you have detected a nail head and are on a stud. The problem with that is that nail heads are a very small area of a wall and it takes a lot of systematic scanning to find them. I invariably end up approximating where I think the studs are, then punching trial holes with an awl. This leaves me patching lots of little trial holes when I'm done. Any suggestions? I have some of those super magnets that are about half the size of a penny. I got a bunch of them on ebay, and they are handy for lots of things. You merely take one and slide it on the wall until it hits a nail head, and then it stays there. You do a couple more, and you got the stud. Best way I have ever found for finding studs. I have two stud finders, and they are pretty good. Still, sometimes, they give weird readings, and you're not absolutely sure where the stud is. With the magnets, I have better luck than that. Steve |
#21
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Evans wrote:
I've struggled with this for the last forty years. I want to hang something on a drywall wall, and I want to use the studs instead of drywall anchors. I have the damndest time finding the studs reliably. There's the time-honored and lo-tech method of tapping on the wall and listening for different tones of hollow wall vs solid stud. So, I find a stud that way, then measure 16" (or 24") on either side, tap there, and hear a hollow sound. At that point, the process becomes random and seldom 100% accurate. I have several electronic detectors and their performance is spotty as well. I can scan the same spot three or four times and get three or four different hits over a space of about four inches, too wide to be a single 2x2. (No, I'm not finding a doubled stud.) The most reliable gadget I have is also the simplest: a small plastic horseshoe with a magnetic pointer suspended between the open ends. You move it over the wall until the pointer moves, at which time you know you have detected a nail head and are on a stud. The problem with that is that nail heads are a very small area of a wall and it takes a lot of systematic scanning to find them. I invariably end up approximating where I think the studs are, then punching trial holes with an awl. This leaves me patching lots of little trial holes when I'm done. Any suggestions? As others have said the electronic units work if you go slow. Many times I use a tape measure measuring from an outlet. There is almost always a stud on one side for the other of an outlet or switch. Take the cover plate off and look for the stud. If you can't see it then use a nail or screwdriver to probe in and find which side the stud is on and then measure from there. Kevin |
#22
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Evans" wrote in message ... I've struggled with this for the last forty years. I want to hang something on a drywall wall, and I want to use the studs instead of drywall anchors. I have the damndest time finding the studs reliably. There's the time-honored and lo-tech method of tapping on the wall and listening for different tones of hollow wall vs solid stud. So, I find a stud that way, then measure 16" (or 24") on either side, tap there, and hear a hollow sound. At that point, the process becomes random and seldom 100% accurate. I have several electronic detectors and their performance is spotty as well. I can scan the same spot three or four times and get three or four different hits over a space of about four inches, too wide to be a single 2x2. (No, I'm not finding a doubled stud.) The most reliable gadget I have is also the simplest: a small plastic horseshoe with a magnetic pointer suspended between the open ends. You move it over the wall until the pointer moves, at which time you know you have detected a nail head and are on a stud. The problem with that is that nail heads are a very small area of a wall and it takes a lot of systematic scanning to find them. I invariably end up approximating where I think the studs are, then punching trial holes with an awl. This leaves me patching lots of little trial holes when I'm done. As an electrician I need to do this on a regular basis. I start at an electrical outlet or switch. The ones that were installed when the house was built are attached to the side of a stud. I remove the wall plate and probe each side of the outlet box to see where the stud is. I also use a short piece of fish tape to push into the wall. I then measure 16" for each additional stud from where I started. This works most of the time, but of course every house is different. I don't own an electronic stud finder. I also look for nail heads popping through or for sloppy spackling over nail heads. I sometimes use my flashlight against the wall and rotate it slowly in several places. The odd angle of the light hitting the wall reveals minor imperfections and can lead to nail heads in a stud. |
#23
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 3, 12:12*pm, Richard Evans wrote:
I've struggled with this for the last forty years. I want to hang something on a drywall wall, and I want to use the studs instead of drywall anchors. I have the damndest time finding the studs reliably. There's the time-honored and lo-tech method of tapping on the wall and listening for different tones of hollow wall vs solid stud. So, I find a stud that way, then measure 16" (or 24") on either side, tap there, and hear a hollow sound. At that point, the process becomes random and seldom 100% accurate. I have several electronic detectors and their performance is spotty as well. I can scan the same spot three or four times and get three or four different hits over a space of about four inches, too wide to be a single 2x2. (No, I'm not finding a doubled stud.) The most reliable gadget I have is also the simplest: a small plastic horseshoe with a magnetic pointer suspended between the open ends. You move it over the wall until the pointer moves, at which time you know you have detected a nail head and are on a stud. The problem with that is that nail heads are a very small area of a wall and it takes a lot of systematic scanning to find them. I invariably end up approximating where I think the studs are, then punching trial holes with an awl. This leaves me patching lots of little trial holes when I'm done. Any suggestions? I have been using small rare earth magnets and the method works great |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Windows Between Studs? | Home Repair | |||
DWV pipe through studs | Home Repair | |||
Studs behind drywall | Home Repair | |||
Iron Studs | UK diy | |||
Ball studs; | Metalworking |