I faxed many docs regarding forest health to most senators. John McCain is
one who wrote me a positive response asking for more data. What is the
matter with that? Forest health is a major concern of people logging and
people opposed to logging federal public land. When I say logging I want to
be absolutely care what I mean:

I am a Obama supporter because of his score card for 2006 was a 100% at
www.lcv.org. Hillary was only 79%. McCain was a 29% so I guess you are
write, maybe we can do better. I.e., for clean air and clean water for our
children and grand children.

He did seem interested in the forest health issues.

--
Sincerely,
John A. Keslick, Jr.
Consulting Forester & Tree Expert
http://home.ccil.org/~treeman
and www.treedictionary.com
Beware of so-called tree experts who do not understand tree biology.
Storms, fires, floods, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions keep reminding us
that we are not the boss.




wrote in message
...
On Jan 31, 3:32 am, Ted wrote:
Open-Borders Activist Juan Hernandez Works for McCain Campaign
MOONBATTERY.COM
Jan. 25, 2008

To get an idea of just how contemptuously John McCain is lying through
his teeth when he claims to have learned his lesson from the shamnesty
debacle, Michelle Malkin reports that Juan Hernandez, whom she
accurately describes as an "ethnocentrist, border obliteration
activist," is working as McLame's Hispanic Outreach Director.

This would clearly indicate that the outreach is not to Hispanic
Americans, but to Mexicans who are colonizing this country illegally.

You've probably seen Hernandez on cable TV, smarmily calling everyone
"my friend" as he demands that the USA renounce any claims to
territorial sovereignty. He has headed up Mexico's Office of Mexicans
Abroad. That is, he's served as an agent of a foreign power whose
interests are clearly hostile to our own regarding the unacceptable
border situation. working for a free flow of people.

In other words, America must submit to unlimited Mexican colonization,
as well as provide healthcare and social services for any Mexican who
cares to take a ride north. Among his causes: defending Mexican bus
drivers for bringing illegal aliens to the USA.

Mexicans in America are still Mexicans in Hernandez's scheme of
things: "I want 'em all to think Mexico first" -- no matter how many
generations they have spent in the USA. Assimilation is clearly not on
his agenda, any more than border security is on McCain's.

Dennis

http://www.vdare.com/ V-Dare

many people would like to drink clean water and breath clean air if they
have the opportunity or choice
--
Sincerely,
John A. Keslick, Jr.
Consulting Forester & Tree Expert
http://home.ccil.org/~treeman
and www.treedictionary.com
Beware of so-called tree experts who do not understand tree biology.
Storms, fires, floods, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions keep reminding us
that we are not the boss.

"symplastless" wrote in message
. ..
I faxed many docs regarding forest health to most senators. John McCain is
one who wrote me a positive response asking for more data. What is the
matter with that? Forest health is a major concern of people logging and
people opposed to logging federal public land. When I say logging I want
to be absolutely care what I mean:

I am a Obama supporter because of his score card for 2006 was a 100% at
www.lcv.org. Hillary was only 79%. McCain was a 29% so I guess you are
write, maybe we can do better. I.e., for clean air and clean water for
our children and grand children.

He did seem interested in the forest health issues.

--
Sincerely,
John A. Keslick, Jr.
Consulting Forester & Tree Expert
http://home.ccil.org/~treeman
and www.treedictionary.com
Beware of so-called tree experts who do not understand tree biology.
Storms, fires, floods, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions keep reminding
us that we are not the boss.




wrote in message
...
On Jan 31, 3:32 am, Ted wrote:
Open-Borders Activist Juan Hernandez Works for McCain Campaign
MOONBATTERY.COM
Jan. 25, 2008

To get an idea of just how contemptuously John McCain is lying through
his teeth when he claims to have learned his lesson from the shamnesty
debacle, Michelle Malkin reports that Juan Hernandez, whom she
accurately describes as an "ethnocentrist, border obliteration
activist," is working as McLame's Hispanic Outreach Director.

This would clearly indicate that the outreach is not to Hispanic
Americans, but to Mexicans who are colonizing this country illegally.

You've probably seen Hernandez on cable TV, smarmily calling everyone
"my friend" as he demands that the USA renounce any claims to
territorial sovereignty. He has headed up Mexico's Office of Mexicans
Abroad. That is, he's served as an agent of a foreign power whose
interests are clearly hostile to our own regarding the unacceptable
border situation. working for a free flow of people.

In other words, America must submit to unlimited Mexican colonization,
as well as provide healthcare and social services for any Mexican who
cares to take a ride north. Among his causes: defending Mexican bus
drivers for bringing illegal aliens to the USA.

Mexicans in America are still Mexicans in Hernandez's scheme of
things: "I want 'em all to think Mexico first" -- no matter how many
generations they have spent in the USA. Assimilation is clearly not on
his agenda, any more than border security is on McCain's.

Dennis

http://www.vdare.com/ V-Dare

symplastless wrote:
I faxed many docs regarding forest health to most senators. John
McCain is one who wrote me a positive response asking for more data. What
is the matter with that? Forest health is a major concern of
people logging and people opposed to logging federal public land. When I
say logging I want to be absolutely care what I mean:

I am a Obama supporter because of his score card for 2006 was a 100%
at www.lcv.org. Hillary was only 79%. McCain was a 29% so I guess
you are write, maybe we can do better. I.e., for clean air and clean
water for our children and grand children.

He did seem interested in the forest health issues.

Tree hugger!

Technology can provide us with all the clean air and clean water we'll ever
need. You'll be able to buy it by the bottle almost anywhere.

HeyBub wrote:
symplastless wrote:

I faxed many docs regarding forest health to most senators. John
McCain is one who wrote me a positive response asking for more data. What
is the matter with that? Forest health is a major concern of
people logging and people opposed to logging federal public land. When I
say logging I want to be absolutely care what I mean:

I am a Obama supporter because of his score card for 2006 was a 100%
at www.lcv.org. Hillary was only 79%. McCain was a 29% so I guess
you are write, maybe we can do better. I.e., for clean air and clean
water for our children and grand children.

He did seem interested in the forest health issues.


Tree hugger!

Technology can provide us with all the clean air and clean water we'll ever
need. You'll be able to buy it by the bottle almost anywhere.


Hmm,
Technology needs clean air and water to begin with. Are you gonna feed
plants, fish, birds, animals bottled water?
If majority is thinking like you, mankind is doomed. It's matter of
time. Good thing you did not say, "God will take care of everyting"

On Feb 1, 10:36*pm, Tony Hwang wrote:
HeyBub wrote:
symplastless wrote:

I faxed many docs regarding forest health to most senators. *John
McCain is one who wrote me a positive response asking for more data. What
is the matter with that? *Forest health is a major concern of
people logging and people opposed to logging federal public land. When I
say logging I want to be absolutely care what I mean:

I am a Obama supporter because of his score card for 2006 was a 100%
atwww.lcv.org. *Hillary was only 79%. *McCain was a 29% so I guess
you are write, maybe we can do better. *I.e., for clean air and clean
water for our children and grand children.

He did seem interested in the forest health issues.

Tree hugger!

Technology can provide us with all the clean air and clean water we'll ever
need. You'll be able to buy it by the bottle almost anywhere.

Hmm,
Technology needs clean air and water to begin with. Are you gonna feed
plants, fish, birds, animals bottled water?
If majority is thinking like you, mankind is doomed. It's matter of
time. Good thing you did not say, "God will take care of everyting"- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The environment is important, but I can only wonder what people are
thinking when they state they are going to vote for a candidate based
on only that issue. In my book, there are many issues other than the
environment to factor in. A president can only have so much effect on
the environment. After all, there is this thing called Congress.
But in areas like foreign policy, making a case for going to war,
deciding what to do when that call comes in the middle of the night,
etc, the president has a hell of a lot more impact and direct
control. Just look at the current president. Did he get drilling in
ANWR? No. But he did convince the country to go to war, didn't he?

Tony Hwang wrote:


Tree hugger!

Technology can provide us with all the clean air and clean water
we'll ever need. You'll be able to buy it by the bottle almost
anywhere.
Hmm,
Technology needs clean air and water to begin with. Are you gonna feed
plants, fish, birds, animals bottled water?
If majority is thinking like you, mankind is doomed. It's matter of
time. Good thing you did not say, "God will take care of everyting"

With enough coal-fired power plants, we can distill unlimited amounts of
water and generate Oxygen by electrolysis.

I don't see a problem.

"HeyBub" wrote in message
...
symplastless wrote:
I faxed many docs regarding forest health to most senators. John
McCain is one who wrote me a positive response asking for more data. What
is the matter with that? Forest health is a major concern of
people logging and people opposed to logging federal public land. When I
say logging I want to be absolutely care what I mean:

I am a Obama supporter because of his score card for 2006 was a 100%
at www.lcv.org. Hillary was only 79%. McCain was a 29% so I guess
you are write, maybe we can do better. I.e., for clean air and clean
water for our children and grand children.

He did seem interested in the forest health issues.

Tree hugger!

Technology can provide us with all the clean air and clean water we'll
ever need. You'll be able to buy it by the bottle almost anywhere.


Actually I am a tree toucher. I tend to make decisions out of tree biology.
If that makes me a hugger than I am a hugger.
No I am a tree kisser! Not hugger!
http://home.ccil.org/~treeman/nfpra/kissers.html


--
Sincerely,
John A. Keslick, Jr.
Consulting Forester & Tree Expert
http://home.ccil.org/~treeman
and www.treedictionary.com
Beware of so-called tree experts who do not understand tree biology.
Storms, fires, floods, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions keep reminding us
that we are not the boss.

"HeyBub" wrote in message
...
Tony Hwang wrote:


Tree hugger!

Technology can provide us with all the clean air and clean water
we'll ever need. You'll be able to buy it by the bottle almost
anywhere.
Hmm,
Technology needs clean air and water to begin with. Are you gonna feed
plants, fish, birds, animals bottled water?
If majority is thinking like you, mankind is doomed. It's matter of
time. Good thing you did not say, "God will take care of everyting"

With enough coal-fired power plants, we can distill unlimited amounts of
water and generate Oxygen by electrolysis.

I don't see a problem.

What about soil?


--
Sincerely,
John A. Keslick, Jr.
Consulting Forester & Tree Expert
http://home.ccil.org/~treeman
and www.treedictionary.com
Beware of so-called tree experts who do not understand tree biology.
Storms, fires, floods, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions keep reminding us
that we are not the boss.

symplastless wrote:
"HeyBub" wrote in message
...
symplastless wrote:
snip
Technology can provide us with all the clean air and clean water we'll
ever need. You'll be able to buy it by the bottle almost anywhere.


Actually I am a tree toucher. I tend to make decisions out of tree biology.
If that makes me a hugger than I am a hugger.
No I am a tree kisser! Not hugger!
http://home.ccil.org/~treeman/nfpra/kissers.html



I'm no tree expert, but I like most trees better than I like most people.

aem sends....

"aemeijers" wrote in message
...
symplastless wrote:
"HeyBub" wrote in message
...
symplastless wrote:
snip
Technology can provide us with all the clean air and clean water we'll
ever need. You'll be able to buy it by the bottle almost anywhere.


Actually I am a tree toucher. I tend to make decisions out of tree
biology. If that makes me a hugger than I am a hugger.
No I am a tree kisser! Not hugger!
http://home.ccil.org/~treeman/nfpra/kissers.html



I'm no tree expert, but I like most trees better than I like most people.

aem sends....

What's you favorite tree?


--
Sincerely,
John A. Keslick, Jr.
Consulting Forester & Tree Expert
http://home.ccil.org/~treeman
and www.treedictionary.com
Beware of so-called tree experts who do not understand tree biology.
Storms, fires, floods, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions keep reminding us
that we are not the boss.

symplastless wrote:
"aemeijers" wrote in message
...
symplastless wrote:
"HeyBub" wrote in message
...
symplastless wrote:
snip
Technology can provide us with all the clean air and clean water we'll
ever need. You'll be able to buy it by the bottle almost anywhere.

Actually I am a tree toucher. I tend to make decisions out of tree
biology. If that makes me a hugger than I am a hugger.
No I am a tree kisser! Not hugger!
http://home.ccil.org/~treeman/nfpra/kissers.html


I'm no tree expert, but I like most trees better than I like most people.

aem sends....

What's you favorite tree?


I don't even know how to answer that. I'm not fussy on species, as long
as they are healthy. I get a little PO'd at the branches that the 60+
foot maple in my back yard keeps dropping- one of these days, one of
them is bound to hit the house. I was utterly blown away driving
through a patch of sequoia on the road up to that famous mountain near
Portland Oregon- I'd love to have a chance to visit there in warmer
weather some time, instead of a lightning side trip for dinner while on
a business trip. But I find hanging out in a tall-canopy forest for an
hour, is good for a least a 20-point drop in BP for the rest of the day,
as long as nothing sets off my allergies, and none of the fauna dines on me.

The 100+ year old building I work in used to have dozens of mature
deciduous trees around it, that provided lots of shade to sit, and park
under. Building management has found excuses to remove most of them, and
replace a few with small evergreens that will never get over 20 feet.
Better than nothing, I guess, but a little boring. IMHO, the desire to
simplfy mowing and avoid raking should not be the criteria for choosing
trees. That, and they (from casual non-expert inspection) all seem to be
the same species. If a bug ever comes around, it'll be looking pretty
brown around there.

aem sends...

In article ,
"symplastless" wrote:



What's you favorite tree?

Usenet mandatory Monty Python reference

The Larch

/Usenet mandatory Monty Python reference

"aemeijers" wrote in message
...
symplastless wrote:
"aemeijers" wrote in message
...
symplastless wrote:
"HeyBub" wrote in message
...
symplastless wrote:
snip
Technology can provide us with all the clean air and clean water we'll
ever need. You'll be able to buy it by the bottle almost anywhere.

Actually I am a tree toucher. I tend to make decisions out of tree
biology. If that makes me a hugger than I am a hugger.
No I am a tree kisser! Not hugger!
http://home.ccil.org/~treeman/nfpra/kissers.html


I'm no tree expert, but I like most trees better than I like most
people.

aem sends....

What's you favorite tree?


I don't even know how to answer that. I'm not fussy on species, as long as
they are healthy.

I like forest where all of the ecological stages of trees are of value.
Each ecological stage is associated with unique groups of organisms and
microorganisms.
Check out the first two articles at this site:
http://www.treedictionary.com/DICT20...get/index.html

--
Sincerely,
John A. Keslick, Jr.
Consulting Forester & Tree Expert
http://home.ccil.org/~treeman
and www.treedictionary.com
Beware of so-called tree experts who do not understand tree biology.
Storms, fires, floods, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions keep reminding us
that we are not the boss.

"Kurt Ullman" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"symplastless" wrote:



What's you favorite tree?

Usenet mandatory Monty Python reference

The Larch

/Usenet mandatory Monty Python reference

Unique tree. A deciduous conifer. Other than ginkgo that's the only
deciduous conifer I know of.

Of course most conifers do shed their foliage, just not all at once.


--
Sincerely,
John A. Keslick, Jr.
Consulting Forester & Tree Expert
http://home.ccil.org/~treeman
and www.treedictionary.com
Beware of so-called tree experts who do not understand tree biology.
Storms, fires, floods, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions keep reminding us
that we are not the boss.

In article ,
"HeyBub" wrote:

symplastless wrote:
I faxed many docs regarding forest health to most senators. John
McCain is one who wrote me a positive response asking for more data. What
is the matter with that? Forest health is a major concern of
people logging and people opposed to logging federal public land. When I
say logging I want to be absolutely care what I mean:

I am a Obama supporter because of his score card for 2006 was a 100%
at www.lcv.org. Hillary was only 79%. McCain was a 29% so I guess
you are write, maybe we can do better. I.e., for clean air and clean
water for our children and grand children.

He did seem interested in the forest health issues.

Tree hugger!

Technology can provide us with all the clean air and clean water we'll ever
need. You'll be able to buy it by the bottle almost anywhere.

There goes the landfills.
--

Billy

Bush, Cheney & Pelosi, Behind Bars
http://rachelcorriefoundation.org/site/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Movemen...George_W._Bush

In article ,
"HeyBub" wrote:

Tony Hwang wrote:


Tree hugger!

Technology can provide us with all the clean air and clean water
we'll ever need. You'll be able to buy it by the bottle almost
anywhere.
Hmm,
Technology needs clean air and water to begin with. Are you gonna feed
plants, fish, birds, animals bottled water?
If majority is thinking like you, mankind is doomed. It's matter of
time. Good thing you did not say, "God will take care of everyting"

With enough coal-fired power plants, we can distill unlimited amounts of
water and generate Oxygen by electrolysis.

I don't see a problem.

What is it? A sick sense of humor or just a very twisted mind?
--

Billy

Bush, Cheney & Pelosi, Behind Bars
http://rachelcorriefoundation.org/site/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Movemen...George_W._Bush

In article
,
Billy wrote:
Sorry, I tried to take it out of the group but forgot the header in my
enthusiasm. I'll trim it in the future.
--

Billy

Bush, Cheney & Pelosi, Behind Bars
http://rachelcorriefoundation.org/site/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Movemen...George_W._Bush

In article ,
sherwindu wrote:

Billy wrote:

In article
,
Billy wrote:

In article
,
Billy wrote:
Sorry, I tried to take it out of the group but forgot the header in my
enthusiasm. I'll trim it in the future.

I seem to be in a groove. That should be the last screw-up for awhile.
--

Billy

Promises, promises .....

Sherwin

Doo Doo is a crazed, bigoted, land stealing Zionist (god, I hate being
redundant) whose first allegiance seems to be to Israel.

Give every Doo his Doo-Doo.
--

Billy

Bush, Cheney & Pelosi, Behind Bars
http://rachelcorriefoundation.org/site/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Movemen...George_W._Bush