On Feb 1, 10:36*pm, Tony Hwang wrote:
HeyBub wrote:
symplastless wrote:

I faxed many docs regarding forest health to most senators. *John
McCain is one who wrote me a positive response asking for more data. What
is the matter with that? *Forest health is a major concern of
people logging and people opposed to logging federal public land. When I
say logging I want to be absolutely care what I mean:

I am a Obama supporter because of his score card for 2006 was a 100%
atwww.lcv.org. *Hillary was only 79%. *McCain was a 29% so I guess
you are write, maybe we can do better. *I.e., for clean air and clean
water for our children and grand children.

He did seem interested in the forest health issues.

Tree hugger!

Technology can provide us with all the clean air and clean water we'll ever
need. You'll be able to buy it by the bottle almost anywhere.

Hmm,
Technology needs clean air and water to begin with. Are you gonna feed
plants, fish, birds, animals bottled water?
If majority is thinking like you, mankind is doomed. It's matter of
time. Good thing you did not say, "God will take care of everyting"- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The environment is important, but I can only wonder what people are
thinking when they state they are going to vote for a candidate based
on only that issue. In my book, there are many issues other than the
environment to factor in. A president can only have so much effect on
the environment. After all, there is this thing called Congress.
But in areas like foreign policy, making a case for going to war,
deciding what to do when that call comes in the middle of the night,
etc, the president has a hell of a lot more impact and direct
control. Just look at the current president. Did he get drilling in
ANWR? No. But he did convince the country to go to war, didn't he?