Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Electronics Repair (sci.electronics.repair) Discussion of repairing electronic equipment. Topics include requests for assistance, where to obtain servicing information and parts, techniques for diagnosis and repair, and annecdotes about success, failures and problems. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bit OT. CFLs revisited.
In my opinion, they should be outlawed world-wide. Period. Suddenly, just as the government here in the UK looks set to ban sales of incandescents, a movement is rearing up to bring to the attention of the great unwashed ( and the dumb politicians ) the potential hazards of using, accidentally breaking, and safely disposing of CFLs. I sincerely hope that it gains sufficient momentum to cast enough doubt over this dreadful knee-jerk technology, to knock its viability as a direct replacement for incandescents, firmly on the head ... I don't want to see either one banned. Most any ban is a knee-jerk reaction from politicians who know little or nothing about the subject at hand. There's ways to encourage use of more energy efficient technology where possible, but there are some applications where incandescent is still the most suitable, and some climates where the waste heat they produce is not really waste. Likewise, I feel that much of the hysteria over lead and mercury in CFLs is unfounded, fluorescent lamps are not the only source of mercury in the environment, and they are not impossible to recycle or dispose of properly. I do feel that any store that sells them should accept dead ones for recycling though, just as is the case with rechargable batteries. |
#42
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bit OT. CFLs revisited.
In my opinion, they should be outlawed world-wide. Period. Suddenly,
just as the government here in the UK looks set to ban sales of incandescents, a movement is rearing up to bring to the attention of the great unwashed (and the dumb politicians) the potential hazards of using, accidentally breaking, and safely disposing of CFLs. I sincerely hope that it gains sufficient momentum to cast enough doubt over this dreadful knee-jerk technology, to knock its viability as a direct replacement for incandescents, firmly on the head... The amount of mercury in any single bulb is small. And it's elemental mercury, not an organic mercury compound, which is not as toxic as the latter. We've been using fluroescent lamps for almost 70 years. Their presence didn't seem to cause much in the way of environmental problems. Or scratched hands. I've replaced several incandescents with CFLs, and I'm very, very pleased. Part of it is that they're in glass fixtures that have a slightly warm cast. You'd never know they're CFLs. |
#43
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bit OT. CFLs revisited.
William Sommerwerck wrote:
In my opinion, they should be outlawed world-wide. Period. Suddenly, just as the government here in the UK looks set to ban sales of incandescents, a movement is rearing up to bring to the attention of the great unwashed (and the dumb politicians) the potential hazards of using, accidentally breaking, and safely disposing of CFLs. I sincerely hope that it gains sufficient momentum to cast enough doubt over this dreadful knee-jerk technology, to knock its viability as a direct replacement for incandescents, firmly on the head... The amount of mercury in any single bulb is small. And it's elemental mercury, not an organic mercury compound, which is not as toxic as the latter. Why do you suppose elemental mercury has been so demonized in the U.S., such that glass thermometers, manometers, barometers, mercury switches, classroom stores and much more are deemed hazards of the highest order and subject to various recalls, seizures and hazmat raids? I had always suspected that vastly more mercury is introduced into the environment from burning coal than could ever reach the food chain from elemental mercury containing devices. We've been using fluroescent lamps for almost 70 years. Their presence didn't seem to cause much in the way of environmental problems. Or scratched hands. Any idea on the amount of accumulated environmental contamination from lamp tube disposal over the past 70 years? It was never uncommon to observe commercial tubes being smashed into dumpsters for decades... Regards, Michael |
#44
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bit OT. CFLs revisited.
Why do you suppose elemental mercury has been so demonized in the U.S., such that glass thermometers, manometers, barometers, mercury switches, classroom stores and much more are deemed hazards of the highest order and subject to various recalls, seizures and hazmat raids? I had always suspected that vastly more mercury is introduced into the environment from burning coal than could ever reach the food chain from elemental mercury containing devices. Gives people something to be hysterical about I suppose. I feel the same way about asbestos and PCBs, I wouldn't spread them on toast or dump them on the ground outside, but I feel they're unfairly demonized and made out to be far more dangerous than they are while other toxic substances are practically ignored. I can't vouch for this, but a friend commented recently that the asbestos removal guys are running out of work and the latest hysteria is formaldahyde in fiberglass insulation. |
#45
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bit OT. CFLs revisited.
"James Sweet" writes:
In my opinion, they should be outlawed world-wide. Period. Suddenly, just as the government here in the UK looks set to ban sales of incandescents, a movement is rearing up to bring to the attention of the great unwashed ( and the dumb politicians ) the potential hazards of using, accidentally breaking, and safely disposing of CFLs. I sincerely hope that it gains sufficient momentum to cast enough doubt over this dreadful knee-jerk technology, to knock its viability as a direct replacement for incandescents, firmly on the head ... I don't want to see either one banned. Most any ban is a knee-jerk reaction from politicians who know little or nothing about the subject at hand. There's ways to encourage use of more energy efficient technology where possible, but there are some applications where incandescent is still the most suitable, and some climates where the waste heat they produce is not really waste. Likewise, I feel that much of the hysteria over lead and mercury in CFLs is unfounded, fluorescent lamps are not the only source of mercury in the environment, and they are not impossible to recycle or dispose of properly. I do feel that any store that sells them should accept dead ones for recycling though, just as is the case with rechargable batteries. How much mercury is there in a single 40 (or 34) watt normal fluorescent lamp? They are often tossed in the trash to break..... --- sam | Sci.Electronics.Repair FAQ: http://www.repairfaq.org/ Repair | Main Table of Contents: http://www.repairfaq.org/REPAIR/ +Lasers | Sam's Laser FAQ: http://www.repairfaq.org/sam/lasersam.htm | Mirror Sites: http://www.repairfaq.org/REPAIR/F_mirror.html Important: Anything sent to the email address in the message header above is ignored unless my full name AND either lasers or electronics is included in the subject line. Or, you can contact me via the Feedback Form in the FAQs. |
#46
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bit OT. CFLs revisited.
"James Sweet" writes:
Why do you suppose elemental mercury has been so demonized in the U.S., such that glass thermometers, manometers, barometers, mercury switches, classroom stores and much more are deemed hazards of the highest order and subject to various recalls, seizures and hazmat raids? I had always suspected that vastly more mercury is introduced into the environment from burning coal than could ever reach the food chain from elemental mercury containing devices. Gives people something to be hysterical about I suppose. I feel the same way about asbestos and PCBs, I wouldn't spread them on toast or dump them on the ground outside, but I feel they're unfairly demonized and made out to be far more dangerous than they are while other toxic substances are practically ignored. Duh, let's see. Asbestos IS a mineral so it's already in the ground outside. --- sam | Sci.Electronics.Repair FAQ: http://www.repairfaq.org/ Repair | Main Table of Contents: http://www.repairfaq.org/REPAIR/ +Lasers | Sam's Laser FAQ: http://www.repairfaq.org/sam/lasersam.htm | Mirror Sites: http://www.repairfaq.org/REPAIR/F_mirror.html Important: Anything sent to the email address in the message header above is ignored unless my full name AND either lasers or electronics is included in the subject line. Or, you can contact me via the Feedback Form in the FAQs. |
#47
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bit OT. CFLs revisited.
The average screw in CFL light, how many volts and amps does it supply
to the wires at the glass bulb? cuhulin |
#48
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bit OT. CFLs revisited.
wrote in message ... The average screw in CFL light, how many volts and amps does it supply to the wires at the glass bulb? cuhulin Volts - quite a lot. Amps - next to nothing. See http://www.pavouk.org/hw/lamp/en_index.html if you want to know more about how they work (or don't ...) Arfa |
#49
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bit OT. CFLs revisited.
wrote in message ... The average screw in CFL light, how many volts and amps does it supply to the wires at the glass bulb? cuhulin Depends on tubing size, typically 60-100V at 80-260mA. The important thing is the current, that determines lamp power, the voltage will settle at whatever the tube likes it to be. Larger diameter tubes tend to run higher current than skinny tubes, but power density has been steadily increasing as the lamps have become more compact. |
#50
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bit OT. CFLs revisited.
William Sommerwerck wrote in message
. .. In my opinion, they should be outlawed world-wide. Period. Suddenly, just as the government here in the UK looks set to ban sales of incandescents, a movement is rearing up to bring to the attention of the great unwashed (and the dumb politicians) the potential hazards of using, accidentally breaking, and safely disposing of CFLs. I sincerely hope that it gains sufficient momentum to cast enough doubt over this dreadful knee-jerk technology, to knock its viability as a direct replacement for incandescents, firmly on the head... The amount of mercury in any single bulb is small. And it's elemental mercury, not an organic mercury compound, which is not as toxic as the latter. We've been using fluroescent lamps for almost 70 years. Their presence didn't seem to cause much in the way of environmental problems. Or scratched hands. I've replaced several incandescents with CFLs, and I'm very, very pleased. Part of it is that they're in glass fixtures that have a slightly warm cast. You'd never know they're CFLs. According to this site http://oee.nrcan.gc.ca/energystar/en...answers.cfm#me rcury The average mercury content in a CFL is about 3 milligrams - roughly the amount it would take to cover the tip of a ball-point pen. And for a home thermometer - 500 milligrams - 2 grams. As a very small kid I managed to break the bulb of a thermometer in my mouth. Then and ecades on and no known physical or mental impairmtgk erkscf dbf qwkcsfd .......... -- Diverse Devices, Southampton, England electronic hints and repair briefs , schematics/manuals list on http://home.graffiti.net/diverse:graffiti.net/ |
#51
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bit OT. CFLs revisited.
"N Cook" wrote in message ... William Sommerwerck wrote in message . .. In my opinion, they should be outlawed world-wide. Period. Suddenly, just as the government here in the UK looks set to ban sales of incandescents, a movement is rearing up to bring to the attention of the great unwashed (and the dumb politicians) the potential hazards of using, accidentally breaking, and safely disposing of CFLs. I sincerely hope that it gains sufficient momentum to cast enough doubt over this dreadful knee-jerk technology, to knock its viability as a direct replacement for incandescents, firmly on the head... The amount of mercury in any single bulb is small. And it's elemental mercury, not an organic mercury compound, which is not as toxic as the latter. We've been using fluroescent lamps for almost 70 years. Their presence didn't seem to cause much in the way of environmental problems. Or scratched hands. I've replaced several incandescents with CFLs, and I'm very, very pleased. Part of it is that they're in glass fixtures that have a slightly warm cast. You'd never know they're CFLs. According to this site http://oee.nrcan.gc.ca/energystar/en...answers.cfm#me rcury The average mercury content in a CFL is about 3 milligrams - roughly the amount it would take to cover the tip of a ball-point pen. And for a home thermometer - 500 milligrams - 2 grams. As a very small kid I managed to break the bulb of a thermometer in my mouth. Then and ecades on and no known physical or mental impairmtgk erkscf dbf qwkcsfd .......... Also as a kid, I had a small pot of mercury that I had 'rescued' from a mercury tilt switch - rather a large one - that was on some lump of junk found on a piece of wasteland where I used to play ... Boy, do you remember the thrill of finding some piece of mysterious 'treasure' like this on those endless summer days ... ? Anyway, I used to play with the stuff in my hands for hours, so it can't have been *that* readily poisonous. Still, if concerns about the toxicity of mercury makes this rotten government sit back and take stock of what they are doing in the name of the great god Green, and it makes them think again about forcing us to adopt the crappy things by banning sales of incandescents, then that's fine with me, and I'll be up there with the best of 'em, screaming about the terrible dangers of having mercury loose in the home for your children to inhale and swallow ! As a youth, I also used to keep a mouthful of lead airgun pellets to slip rapidly into my gun, instead of having to hunt amongst the fluff in my pocket, or trying to wrestle the box open without dropping them all. They would stay in my mouth for hours, again during those endless summer days of the school break. I don't suppose that you can get any worse than that for potential toxicity, but I'm still around and compos mentis, as are all my mates who used to do the same thing. Arfa |
#52
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bit OT. CFLs revisited.
In article , Sam Goldwasser wrote:
"James Sweet" writes: In my opinion, they should be outlawed world-wide. Period. Suddenly, just as the government here in the UK looks set to ban sales of incandescents, a movement is rearing up to bring to the attention of the great unwashed ( and the dumb politicians ) the potential hazards of using, accidentally breaking, and safely disposing of CFLs. I sincerely hope that it gains sufficient momentum to cast enough doubt over this dreadful knee-jerk technology, to knock its viability as a direct replacement for incandescents, firmly on the head ... I don't want to see either one banned. Most any ban is a knee-jerk reaction from politicians who know little or nothing about the subject at hand. There's ways to encourage use of more energy efficient technology where possible, but there are some applications where incandescent is still the most suitable, and some climates where the waste heat they produce is not really waste. Likewise, I feel that much of the hysteria over lead and mercury in CFLs is unfounded, fluorescent lamps are not the only source of mercury in the environment, and they are not impossible to recycle or dispose of properly. I do feel that any store that sells them should accept dead ones for recycling though, just as is the case with rechargable batteries. How much mercury is there in a single 40 (or 34) watt normal fluorescent lamp? They are often tossed in the trash to break..... First thing you hear is CFL's, and nothing about regular fluorescent lamps. which are a dominate lamp in the world. Wonder why !! greg |
#53
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bit OT. CFLs revisited.
In article ,
GregS wrote: First thing you hear is CFL's, and nothing about regular fluorescent lamps. which are a dominate lamp in the world. Wonder why !! Because the average tree hugger doesn't realise they are one and the same thing when preaching how CFLs will save the planet. And missing the fact that an 'old fashioned' fluorescent has a separate ballast which can outlast several tubes while a CFL has it built in so has to be thrown away complete when it fails. -- *There are two kinds of pedestrians... the quick and the dead. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#54
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bit OT. CFLs revisited.
Arfa Daily wrote:
Also as a kid, I had a small pot of mercury that I had 'rescued' from a mercury tilt switch - rather a large one - that was on some lump of junk found on a piece of wasteland where I used to play ... Boy, do you remember the thrill of finding some piece of mysterious 'treasure' like this on those endless summer days ... ? Anyway, I used to play with the stuff in my hands for hours, so it can't have been *that* readily poisonous. Once upon a time there used to be cheap toys that had blobs of mercury as the "active agent." Think of a 4"/10cm square plastic maze with a clear plastic cover; race your friends to get the mercury blob to the center in the fastest time! And of course, one *had* to take the mercury out to play with it. I still recall that distinctive smell of a pool of elemental mercury. -- Rich Webb Norfolk, VA |
#55
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bit OT. CFLs revisited.
In article , Rich Webb wrote:
Arfa Daily wrote: Also as a kid, I had a small pot of mercury that I had 'rescued' from a mercury tilt switch - rather a large one - that was on some lump of junk found on a piece of wasteland where I used to play ... Boy, do you remember the thrill of finding some piece of mysterious 'treasure' like this on those endless summer days ... ? Anyway, I used to play with the stuff in my hands for hours, so it can't have been *that* readily poisonous. Once upon a time there used to be cheap toys that had blobs of mercury as the "active agent." Think of a 4"/10cm square plastic maze with a clear plastic cover; race your friends to get the mercury blob to the center in the fastest time! And of course, one *had* to take the mercury out to play with it. I still recall that distinctive smell of a pool of elemental mercury. I don't recall a smell. I once was in a storage room with shelves and a bunch of old medical research equipment. One of the pressure measuring devices, with plenty of mercury, fell. Of course it was all glass. Mercury all over the place. I just was happy I didn't have to clean it. I'm talking a LOT of mercury. I used to take those mercury batteries apart when i was a kid, and roll the mercury around with my fingers to coat a penny. greg |
#56
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bit OT. CFLs revisited.
I own a few very old mercury thermomenters.(I like to collect all kinds
of very old things) When I was a kid, I played with some mercury too, mercury will shine up old coins real good.(mercury is a liquid metal) I haven't checked the old 1940s Honeywell thermostats on two of the walls in my old house (house was built in 1947, it has asbestos shingles on the outside walls) lately, but I think they have mercury switches. I owned a Daisy pump action BB gun when I was a kid.I still remember sometimes the pump slide (whatever it's called?) action catching the palm of my left hand in that slide.It hurt too. cuhulin |
#57
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bit OT. CFLs revisited.
|
#58
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bit OT. CFLs revisited.
Be real careful of that Daisy BB Gun slider.They know how to move fast
and pinch the daylights out of the palm of your hand. www.daisy.com/history.html www.bbairguns.com The two Honeywell thermostats on the walls in my house are the original ones that were put there in 1947.They still work just as good as new.They are rectangular shaped and have a small thermomenter on the front of them.That was back in the days when they made them Good. cuhulin |
#59
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bit OT. CFLs revisited.
"GregS" wrote in message ... In article , Sam Goldwasser wrote: "James Sweet" writes: In my opinion, they should be outlawed world-wide. Period. Suddenly, just as the government here in the UK looks set to ban sales of incandescents, a movement is rearing up to bring to the attention of the great unwashed ( and the dumb politicians ) the potential hazards of using, accidentally breaking, and safely disposing of CFLs. I sincerely hope that it gains sufficient momentum to cast enough doubt over this dreadful knee-jerk technology, to knock its viability as a direct replacement for incandescents, firmly on the head ... I don't want to see either one banned. Most any ban is a knee-jerk reaction from politicians who know little or nothing about the subject at hand. There's ways to encourage use of more energy efficient technology where possible, but there are some applications where incandescent is still the most suitable, and some climates where the waste heat they produce is not really waste. Likewise, I feel that much of the hysteria over lead and mercury in CFLs is unfounded, fluorescent lamps are not the only source of mercury in the environment, and they are not impossible to recycle or dispose of properly. I do feel that any store that sells them should accept dead ones for recycling though, just as is the case with rechargable batteries. How much mercury is there in a single 40 (or 34) watt normal fluorescent lamp? They are often tossed in the trash to break..... First thing you hear is CFL's, and nothing about regular fluorescent lamps. which are a dominate lamp in the world. Wonder why !! greg I guess it's because they are firmly fixed in overhead fittings, and the tubes, which are uber-reliable compared to CFLs, are not much handled by kids. On the other hand, when there are zillions of CFLs in every Joe Tow Rag's house, there's gonna be thicko people disposing of all the dud ones any which way, irrespective of what the Recycle Stasi dictate, and their kids, chucking them up walls for the sport... Arfa |
#60
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bit OT. CFLs revisited.
wrote in message ... Be real careful of that Daisy BB Gun slider.They know how to move fast and pinch the daylights out of the palm of your hand. www.daisy.com/history.html www.bbairguns.com The two Honeywell thermostats on the walls in my house are the original ones that were put there in 1947.They still work just as good as new.They are rectangular shaped and have a small thermomenter on the front of them.That was back in the days when they made them Good. cuhulin I've never had any sort of thermostat fail, mechanical or electronic. My house came with an old Honeywell mechanical, it worked but I replaced it with a programmable one that can set back at night, it dropped my heating bill considerably and I don't have to manually mess with it. |
#61
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bit OT. CFLs revisited.
"Arfa Daily" wrote in
: Also as a kid, I had a small pot of mercury that I had 'rescued' from a mercury tilt switch - I too remember playing with mercury obtained from various sources, coating a penny with it, and the oily feel of the coated penny. Metallic mercury is hazardous under three circumstances: 1) when heated. 2) when a small amount of mercury is exposed to the air in the room where you work regularly. 3) When water soluble form is present in food or drink. Mercury builds up in the body over time because the elimination of mercury is very slow. So, if you heat mercury, its high vapor pressure puts a lot of mercury vapor into the air and you can absorb a fatal dose very quickly. If you work in a room where mercury has been spilled, its room temperature vapor pressure is sufficient for you to, over time, build up enough mercury to experience toxic effects. "The Handbook of Laboratory Safety" (CRC) has an interesting chapter on mercury. When I was studying chemistry in college, we had an almost fatal accident. A student was working alone in a lab [never work alone!]. Another student had left, leaving a beaker of Mercuric Chloride solution heating. The water evaporated and the mercuric chloride decomposed, giving off mercury vapor. The student that had been working alone in the room was found, crawling out of the lab. They got him to the hospital and started treating him immediately for mercury poisoning. He spent about a week in the hospital, with special chemicals being dripped into his veins to remove the mercury from his body. He said that the treatment felt like liquid fire being pumped into his veins. During that time, he wished he were dead. His first urine sample, taken after admission, had enough mercury in it to KILL ten people. Of course, water soluble mercury and lead compounds are much more dangerous than metallic mercury or metallic lead as they are easier to get into the human body. Normal 'clearance' of mercury is on the order of a maximum of 2 mg per day. So if you are absorbing more than that, you are building up toward a toxic dose. Of course, children are more sensitive to the toxic effects of heavy metals. -- bz please pardon my infinite ignorance, the set-of-things-I-do-not-know is an infinite set. remove ch100-5 to avoid spam trap |
#62
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bit OT. CFLs revisited.
California wants to control your home thermostats.
http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/01/...rica/calif.php That might happen in California, but that is never going to happen here, not in my home.Never hatchie, G.I.! cuhulin |
#63
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bit OT. CFLs revisited.
Untill poor old henpecked Richard decided to fix the electricity in the
Vicor's Church on Keeping Up Apperances and blew the whole system out.The Beer was pretty good though. www.churchangel.com cuhulin |
#64
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bit OT. CFLs revisited.
Two floor furnaces.My house is warm as toast.I can sleep naked if I want
to, sometimes, I do.No freezing here in the deep auld South. cuhulin |
#65
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bit OT. CFLs revisited.
Josh wrote:
In article , Michael A. Terrell says... The Vicor supplies ... had a horrible failure rate. That's not surprising. I hate Vicor supplies. I removed them from our approved vendor lists, even thosugh the change required a redesign of several chassis in our product line. -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |
#66
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bit OT. CFLs revisited.
Hows it going in central Florida, Terrell? I have my DD 214
too.Sgt.Mariano, Fort Hood,Texas, October 29,1965.Dudette. www.angelfire.com/md2/Ldotvets Page tree, about five clicks down past the picture of Riley.I am not Riley.I am, tain. cuhulin |
#67
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bit OT. CFLs revisited.
bz wrote:
... Also, I note that the package warns about possible radio frequency interference and advises not to use near vital communications equipment. Argh! I am going to look for some LED lights. I have a led flashlight, works great; but, bring it near an am radio and it damn near wipes the band out ... Regards, JS |
#68
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bit OT. CFLs revisited.
James Sweet wrote:
... I don't want to see either one banned. ... Right now, electricity is relatively cheap here in the USA, 10/25 cents a KW. When that becomes closer to $1.00/KW USD you won't want them banned ... Regards, JS |
#69
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Bit OT. CFLs revisited.
"John Smith" wrote in message ... James Sweet wrote: ... I don't want to see either one banned. ... Right now, electricity is relatively cheap here in the USA, 10/25 cents a KW. When that becomes closer to $1.00/KW USD you won't want them banned ... In my corner it's more like 7.5c/KWH. I use CFLs mostly but regardless of the cost of energy I don't want either light source banned. The economics will encourage people to use higher efficiency lights and appliances, those who don't will pay accordingly. I'm even ok with taxing less efficient items, but to blanket ban a style of light bulb is stupid. I did some calculating and even if my lights were all incandescent, the overall energy use of my home would not change dramatically. Lighting is simply not a large portion of the power I use. The hot tub and heat pump use more than everything else combined by far. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
CFLs - switching on and off | UK diy | |||
CFLs - switching on and off | Home Repair | |||
CFLs | Home Repair | |||
CFLs aint so great | Home Ownership | |||
dimmer swicthes and CFLs | UK diy |