Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Electronics Repair (sci.electronics.repair) Discussion of repairing electronic equipment. Topics include requests for assistance, where to obtain servicing information and parts, techniques for diagnosis and repair, and annecdotes about success, failures and problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,rec.antiques.radio+phono,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This dumbass has posted this box four times previously and drops the
price abought eighty dollars each time. He is also a smartmouth and disrespectful to his betters. Western Electric Oscillator 11-A with (x4) 231D triodes Item number: 260097248657 Seller of this item? Sign in for your status Watch this item in My eBay Starting bid: US $739.00 Place Bid End time: Mar-21-07 19:52:05 PDT (4 days 1 hour) Shipping costs: US $35.00 Standard Flat Starting time: Mar-14-07 19:52:05 PDT Starting bid: US $739.00 Duration: 7-day listing Meet the seller Seller: tube( 376Feedback score is 100 to 499) Feedback: 99.7% Positive Member: since Apr-12-98 in United States Read feedback comments Ask seller a question Add to Favorite Sellers View seller's other items Contact the seller instantly Buy safely 1. Check the seller's reputation Sco 376 | 99.7% Positive Read feedback comments 2. Check how you're protected This item is covered up to $2,000 See eligibility Description Western Electric Oscillator 11-A. Item is un-tested and sold as-is contains (x4) un-used 231D triode tubes, (x1) 126A opt trans, and (x1) 130B RET. See photos for condition See my other auctions for more interesting items |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,rec.antiques.radio+phono,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() And the purpose of this post is? |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,rec.antiques.radio+phono,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 17, 6:56 pm, "Charles Schuler"
wrote: And the purpose of this post is? He has homoerotic obsessions for this guy, I can't otherwise explain why he does this over and over. Sam Kinison mode BECAUSE HE'S A FREAK AND WE'RE IN HELLLLLLL! AAAAA AAAAAA A AAAAAAA! /OFF thank you |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,rec.antiques.radio+phono,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 17, 9:51�pm, "Bret Ludwig" wrote:
*This dumbass has posted this box four times previously and drops the price abought eighty dollars each time. He is also a smartmouth and disrespectful to his betters. Western Electric Oscillator 11-A with (x4) 231D triodes * * * * Item number: 260097248657 Seller of this item? Sign in for your status * *Watch this item in My eBay Starting bid: * US $739.00 Place Bid End time: * * * Mar-21-07 19:52:05 PDT (4 days 1 hour) Shipping costs: US $35.00 Standard Flat Starting time: *Mar-14-07 19:52:05 PDT Starting bid: * US $739.00 Duration: * * * 7-day listing Meet the seller Seller: tube( 376Feedback score is 100 to 499) Feedback: * * * 99.7% Positive Member: since Apr-12-98 in United States * * * * Read feedback comments * * * * Ask seller a question * * * * Add to Favorite Sellers * * * * View seller's other items Contact the seller instantly Buy safely 1. * * *Check the seller's reputation * * * * Sco 376 | 99.7% Positive Read feedback comments 2. * * *Check how you're protected This item is covered up to $2,000 See eligibility Description Western Electric Oscillator 11-A. Item is un-tested and sold as-is contains (x4) un-used 231D triode tubes, (x1) 126A opt trans, and (x1) 130B RET. See photos for condition See my other auctions for more interesting items what are you...15 years old? You have to cuss in every post to show you are tough? |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,rec.antiques.radio+phono,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi RATs!
Doesn't matter how old Bart is, he is unhappy. I'm not, but, I never got any satisfaction out of spotlighting other's foibles. This is the Internet. Get hip or die trying ![]() Happy Ears! Al |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,rec.antiques.radio+phono,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() tubegarden wrote: Hi RATs! Doesn't matter how old Bart is, he is unhappy. I'm not, but, I never got any satisfaction out of spotlighting other's foibles. This is the Internet. This is *USENET* ! Graham |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,rec.antiques.radio+phono,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 18, 9:29 am, Eeyore
wrote: This is *USENET* ! No, internet also. I access this USENET group through Google Groups, via a web browser and the internet, that way I can access it from any computer without needing special newsreader software or news server access. For other USENET groups, I access through a news server and news reader. |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,rec.antiques.radio+phono,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
" wrote:
On Mar 18, 9:29 am, Eeyore wrote: This is *USENET* ! No, internet also. I access this USENET group through Google Groups, via a web browser and the internet, that way I can access it from any computer without needing special newsreader software or news server access. For other USENET groups, I access through a news server and news reader. Its still Usenet, no matter how you access it. -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,rec.antiques.radio+phono,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 18, 10:25 am, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote: " wrote: On Mar 18, 9:29 am, Eeyore wrote: This is *USENET* ! No, internet also. I access this USENET group through Google Groups, via a web browser and the internet, that way I can access it from any computer without needing special newsreader software or news server access. For other USENET groups, I access through a news server and news reader. Its still Usenet, no matter how you access it. Right. I didn't say it wasn't USENET. It's both, not ONLY one or the other. |
#10
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,rec.antiques.radio+phono,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 18, 7:21 am, "Eddie Brimer" wrote:
On Mar 17, 9:51?pm, "Bret Ludwig" wrote: ?This dumbass has posted this box four times previously and drops the price abought eighty dollars each time. He is also a smartmouth and disrespectful to his betters. Western Electric Oscillator 11-A with (x4) 231D triodes ? ? ? ? Item number: 260097248657 Seller of this item? Sign in for your status ? ?Watch this item in My eBay Starting bid: ? US $739.00 Place Bid End time: ? ? ? Mar-21-07 19:52:05 PDT (4 days 1 hour) Shipping costs: US $35.00 Standard Flat Starting time: ?Mar-14-07 19:52:05 PDT Starting bid: ? US $739.00 Duration: ? ? ? 7-day listing Meet the seller Seller: tube( 376Feedback score is 100 to 499) Feedback: ? ? ? 99.7% Positive Member: since Apr-12-98 in United States ? ? ? ? Read feedback comments ? ? ? ? Ask seller a question ? ? ? ? Add to Favorite Sellers ? ? ? ? View seller's other items Contact the seller instantly Buy safely 1. ? ? ?Check the seller's reputation ? ? ? ? Sco 376 | 99.7% Positive Read feedback comments 2. ? ? ?Check how you're protected This item is covered up to $2,000 See eligibility Description Western Electric Oscillator 11-A. Item is un-tested and sold as-is contains (x4) un-used 231D triode tubes, (x1) 126A opt trans, and (x1) 130B RET. See photos for condition See my other auctions for more interesting items what are you...15 years old? You have to cuss in every post to show you are tough? LOL. You guys have the wrong approach. I had Mr. Ledwig respond to another on topic discussion I started, not this one. As usual there was his tort belly aching response with no substance. Then I did something bad, oh no. I asked him an intelligent question to back up his whining. No response yet, and probably won't be one. So my point is hit the undesirables up with intelligent on topic discussion if you want them to go away. With Bart Ledfart I now have three I'm ignoring. |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,rec.antiques.radio+phono,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Radiola" said:
LOL. You guys have the wrong approach. I had Mr. Ledwig respond to another on topic discussion I started, not this one. As usual there was his tort belly aching response with no substance. Then I did something bad, oh no. I asked him an intelligent question to back up his whining. No response yet, and probably won't be one. So my point is hit the undesirables up with intelligent on topic discussion if you want them to go away. With Bart Ledfart I now have three I'm ignoring. The Bratwig is just a self-centered attention whore. You won't miss much. -- - Maggies are an addiction for life. - |
#12
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,rec.antiques.radio+phono,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17 Mar 2007 18:51:26 -0700, "Bret Ludwig"
wrote: Western Electric Oscillator 11-A with (x4) 231D triodes Item number: 260097248657 snip I must've run across 20 of those 11As during my telephone career, mostly left over from the J and K carrier and 18B testboard era. They were replaced in the '50s by the 21A and many others. Many old outside plant offices had these things sitting on the shelves until the '80s, when the "traditional" AT&T started to crumble. This one was built at the WECO Virginia Works in April, 1947, a very late example. Most came from the mid 1930s. This one was obviously stolen from an office somewhere. AT&T would demand that these be destroyed when taken out of service. Also ripped off out of many offices: 101A power amplifiers, the first negative feedback/beam power power amp, first produced in 1940. AT&T and its local companies used them for every imaginable service until they were replaced in the '60s by Altec tube amps. I know one huckster, who worked for a minicomputer maintenance outfit, that ripped off two of them from the old Los Angeles Program Operating Center and got $5K apiece for them in Japan. If discovered absconding with these without a supervisor's written permission, he could have been terminated immediately. |
#13
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,rec.antiques.radio+phono,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18 Mar 2007 04:40:36 -0700, "thisjukeboxplays33rpm"
wrote: He has homoerotic obsessions for this guy, I can't otherwise explain why he does this over and over. snip How did you evade my kill filter? No matter....plOnk! |
#14
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,rec.antiques.radio+phono,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18 Mar 2007 06:47:46 -0700, "
wrote: On Mar 18, 9:29 am, Eeyore wrote: This is *USENET* ! No, internet also. I access this USENET group through Google Groups snip Your stock just crashed. Goo Goo Groups = "Usenet for 'Tards" |
#15
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,rec.antiques.radio+phono,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() LOL. You guys have the wrong approach. I had Mr. Ledwig respond to another on topic discussion I started, not this one. As usual there was his tort belly aching response with no substance. Then I did something bad, oh no. I asked him an intelligent question to back up his whining. No response yet, and probably won't be one. So my point is hit the undesirables up with intelligent on topic discussion if you want them to go away. With Bart Ledfart I now have three I'm ignoring. The answer to your question is obvious to most, but since you asked, it's that we have a eBay vendor who is trying to sell something for an inasne amount of money and we are entitled to a little sport with him. Also this is not a common piece at all-it has to be late 1920s construction. The later poster is confusing this with the AC powered metal case 19C, I think, which was thick on the land until orientals started buying them for their not very good transformers. |
#16
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,rec.antiques.radio+phono,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() This one was built at the WECO Virginia Works in April, 1947, a very late example. And how do you know this? Most came from the mid 1930s. This one was obviously stolen from an office somewhere. AT&T would demand that these be destroyed when taken out of service. I knew people who used to steal everything imaginable out of service trucks when, I suppose, they realized they destroyed it all because the value of the stuff on the surplus market was "less" than the "time" needed to properly "account" for it. At the time I refused to engage in this myself because I didn't want to get the truck drivers in trouble. Also ripped off out of many offices: 101A power amplifiers, the first negative feedback/beam power power amp, first produced in 1940. AT&T and its local companies used them for every imaginable service until they were replaced in the '60s by Altec tube amps. I know one huckster, who worked for a minicomputer maintenance outfit, that ripped off two of them from the old Los Angeles Program Operating Center and got $5K apiece for them in Japan. If discovered absconding with these without a supervisor's written permission, he could have been terminated immediately. And if he didn't he made ten grand, which came in handy when they laid him off. Saved them from destruction, did it not? Breaking up AT&T was the right thing to do but it was traumatic. |
#17
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,rec.antiques.radio+phono,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 18, 2:11 pm, Sander deWaal wrote:
"Radiola" said: LOL. You guys have the wrong approach. I had Mr. Ledwig respond to another on topic discussion I started, not this one. As usual there was his tort belly aching response with no substance. Then I did something bad, oh no. I asked him an intelligent question to back up his whining. No response yet, and probably won't be one. So my point is hit the undesirables up with intelligent on topic discussion if you want them to go away. With Bart Ledfart I now have three I'm ignoring. Sometimes I miss one. I don't LIVE on Usenet like you. |
#18
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,rec.antiques.radio+phono,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In rec.antiques.radio+phono Bret Ludwig wrote:
The answer to your question is obvious to most, but since you asked, it's that we have a eBay vendor who is trying to sell something for an inasne amount of money and we are entitled to a little sport with him. Also this is not a common piece at all-it has to be late 1920s construction. The later poster is confusing this with the AC powered metal case 19C, I think, which was thick on the land until orientals started buying them for their not very good transformers. Anyway, you stated earlier you have conserved 2 of those, and no doubt others have them in their collections as well. I still fail to see what is the big problem to selling the remaining units to be used for parts, even if the takers are 'fools'... You can't hoard and keep all nice stuff for yourself, it would be impractical to never recycle stuff. As long as some examples are being preserved by caring individuals all seems well to me. -- Met vriendelijke groet, Maarten Bakker. |
#19
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,rec.antiques.radio+phono,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 18, 5:45 pm, wrote:
In rec.antiques.radio+phono Bret Ludwig wrote: The answer to your question is obvious to most, but since you asked, it's that we have a eBay vendor who is trying to sell something for an inasne amount of money and we are entitled to a little sport with him. Also this is not a common piece at all-it has to be late 1920s construction. The later poster is confusing this with the AC powered metal case 19C, I think, which was thick on the land until orientals started buying them for their not very good transformers. Anyway, you stated earlier you have conserved 2 of those, and no doubt others have them in their collections as well. I still fail to see what is the big problem to selling the remaining units to be used for parts, even if the takers are 'fools'... You can't hoard and keep all nice stuff for yourself, it would be impractical to never recycle stuff. As long as some examples are being preserved by caring individuals all seems well to me. They should make new ones instead of buying up all our stuff. We should make it tough for them to buy it all up. The 19C is not a huge loss to society but they are driving prices on everything now, except Dynajunk. We need to think nationalistically to some extent. If I lived in Hoilland I would support the Dutch version of the BNP or "Die Partei" (NPD). |
#20
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,rec.antiques.radio+phono,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Also ripped off out of many offices: 101A power amplifiers, the first negative feedback/beam power power amp, first produced in 1940. AT&T and its local companies used them for every imaginable service until they were replaced in the '60s by Altec tube amps. McIntosh made three different models of KS amps for Bell as well. They are some of the best Mc's made. They all have a specially designed bifilar opt for each model. |
#21
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,rec.antiques.radio+phono,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18 Mar 2007 15:24:35 -0700, "Bret Ludwig"
wrote: Also this is not a common piece at all-it has to be late 1920s construction. snip Late '20s-early '30s in design, bu that particular specimen was built in 1947. The stenciling on a component inside is the giveaway there, UNLESS that particular compoenent inside was changed out at some time. All WECO gear had date and plant codes well into the '70s that consisted of the month, a single letter denoting which plant (V was Virginia Works, O was Oklahoma City, M was Merrimack Valley, etc) and the last two digits of the year. Thus, this stenciling of 5V47 meant the particular piece was made in April, 1947 at WECO's Virginia Works. The later poster is confusing this with the AC powered metal case 19C, I think, which was thick on the land until orientals started buying them for their not very good transformers. snip The 19C was central office test equipment, usually, but also had a portable version. The 11A was designed to be a lineman's portable, but was also found in considerable numbers inside many toll offices for decades. |
#22
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,rec.antiques.radio+phono,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18 Mar 2007 16:32:53 -0700, "Bret Ludwig"
wrote: They should make new ones instead of buying up all our stuff. We should make it tough for them to buy it all up. The 19C is not a huge loss to society but they are driving prices on everything now, except Dynajunk. We need to think nationalistically to some extent. snip Will never happen again. Americans are too soft and too greedy. Hence, all the fraud on eBay. The Chinese know that and are stripping our wallets with that knowledge. |
#23
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,rec.antiques.radio+phono,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18 Mar 2007 15:30:57 -0700, "Bret Ludwig"
wrote: This one was built at the WECO Virginia Works in April, 1947, a very late example. And how do you know this? snip 20+ years Bell System/AT&T employment. See previous post for date coding of equipment. |
#24
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 18, 3:11 pm, DeserTBoB wrote:
On 18 Mar 2007 04:40:36 -0700, "thisjukeboxplays33rpm" wrote: He has homoerotic obsessions for this guy, I can't otherwise explain why he does this over and over. snip How did you evade my kill filter? No matter....plOnk! Hmm. Was it... 1. Got spoofed 2. Changed my posting name 3 times along the way until it was safer 3. Finally got a better HDD with W2K sitting on it. 4. It's queer that you should think I'M a problem. 5. Quit Crossposting and it will be harder to find me. 6. STFU already. |
#25
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,rec.antiques.radio+phono,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 18, 9:43 pm, DeserTBoB wrote:
On 18 Mar 2007 15:24:35 -0700, "Bret Ludwig" wrote: Also this is not a common piece at all-it has to be late 1920s construction. snip Late '20s-early '30s in design, bu that particular specimen was built in 1947. The stenciling on a component inside is the giveaway there, UNLESS that particular compoenent inside was changed out at some time. All WECO gear had date and plant codes well into the '70s that consisted of the month, a single letter denoting which plant (V was Virginia Works, O was Oklahoma City, M was Merrimack Valley, etc) and the last two digits of the year. Thus, this stenciling of 5V47 meant the particular piece was made in April, 1947 at WECO's Virginia Works. The later poster is confusing this with the AC powered metal case 19C, I think, which was thick on the land until orientals started buying them for their not very good transformers. snip The 19C was central office test equipment, usually, but also had a portable version. The 11A was designed to be a lineman's portable, but was also found in considerable numbers inside many toll offices for decades. Your eyes are better than mine, I missed the date codes. I would have thought the wood case, four pin tubes and cloth wires would have been long since superceded by '47. One of my 19Cs has all 1948 date code transformers, the other has a mishmash. Neither is very clean inside but both work. He didn't give a very good photo of the front of the set. The 19C has both a hole in the front panel and a hole on the side where the cord can come out or some have a recessed two conductor male on the left side. All have holes galore for mounting a lid, rack ears, or WHY. The handles or lid are mounted as needed apparently, Both of mine make audible noises- a sine wave, but a different pitch than the gen output-when operating on certain frequencies. The acoustic pitch varies dramatically when the dial is turned. I noticed that if the AC supply voltage varies at all the sound varies too. It sounds like a pure sine wave. I have been meaning to use a stethoscope to see what is making the noise, I assume the caps, but you know what assume means. I also haven't figured out WHICH of the transformers they are really after. There is no pilot light. I used a similar beast where I worked a long time ago. It was not a 19C, I don't remember the designation. It had the female longframe jacks for output and the manual indicated it was for 110 VAC-DC but that a 48V Co version was available. No one else seems to know what I am talking about and you seem legit Bell. I do not have the book although there is a very yellowed schematic in the back of the set on one. The other has been stripped and repainted. Local ex-Bell people all think these things are a POS until I tell them they will bring $500 now. i always thought het oscillators were a cheap way of doing things but it has been pointed out they sweep far more stably than Wien bridge sets. Perhaps someone reading this has the service notes and would send a good copy or scan to one of the boatanchor or test Web sites where they put manuals so we can all see this. Probably out of copyright now. |
#26
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,rec.antiques.radio+phono,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18 Mar 2007 23:55:36 -0700, "Bret Ludwig"
wrote: Your eyes are better than mine, I missed the date codes. I would have thought the wood case, four pin tubes and cloth wires would have been long since superceded by '47.snip Not even. WECO was still building such test gear way into the early '60s...meggers, portable tube testers, special purpose oscillators and the like...all in the oak boxes and with WECO-based 101Ds and 231Ds. They threw in the towel on test equipment manufacture after the disastrous attempt at a digitally synthesized HF oscillator and selectrive detector, the 90-series. After that, most offices wound up with either Wandel-Goltermann or Cushman sets to do the same duty in a much smaller, much more accurate package. Hell, WECO was still using galvanometer-based thermocouple type power meters to measure power as late as the late '60s...the 34A and 70A power meters actually came in grey cases with "modern" hardware...and the old, 1920s thermocouples. Accurate to .01 dB, yes, but there was no way to know what the hell you were looking at. After around 1970, WECO ceased all test gear manufacture and used "Kearney Specifications" to get WECO-branded stuff made by HP and many others. One of my 19Cs has all 1948 date code transformers, the other has a mishmash. Neither is very clean inside but both work. snip They'll work, but they tend not to be very accurate or trustworthy. The 19C has both a hole in the front panel and a hole on the side where the cord can come out or some have a recessed two conductor male on the left side. snip Usually these were non-standard, non-grounded Hubbell Twist-Loks, with the other end being a non-polarized AC plug. All have holes galore for mounting a lid, rack ears, or WHY. The handles or lid are mounted as needed apparently, Both of mine make audible noises- a sine wave, but a different pitch than the gen output-when operating on certain frequencies.snip Common. The noise is coming from the transformers. The acoustic pitch varies dramatically when the dial is turned. I noticed that if the AC supply voltage varies at all the sound varies too. It sounds like a pure sine wave. I have been meaning to use a stethoscope to see what is making the noise, I assume the caps, but you know what assume means. I also haven't figured out WHICH of the transformers they are really after. There is no pilot light. snip Japs hare crazy. They go after WECO gear because it's "top line American stuff" from the golden age of US technology. In actuality, WECO transformers were all special design for each application, and weren't all that great. The output transformers on the 101A, for example, produce copious amounts of third harmonic, which the negative feedback loop cancels. Any Stancor would be better at coupling audio. I used a similar beast where I worked a long time ago. It was not a 19C, I don't remember the designation. It had the female longframe jacks for output and the manual indicated it was for 110 VAC-DC but that a 48V Co version was available. No one else seems to know what I am talking about and you seem legit Bell. snip Let's see...there was the 21-set, which was a combined AF oscillator and voltmeter that answers that description somewhat. The voltmeter, while not true RMS reading, had a novel tube driven scaling circuit that'd take the incoming sine wave and convert the DC to the meter to be fed to a panel meter calibrated in dB in linear increments...much ado about nothing, really. 21As were very common until the end of my toll CO career in the '80s. I do not have the book although there is a very yellowed schematic in the back of the set on one. The other has been stripped and repainted. Local ex-Bell people all think these things are a POS until I tell them they will bring $500 now. i always thought het oscillators were a cheap way of doing things but it has been pointed out they sweep far more stably than Wien bridge sets. snip A lot of that WECO test gear wasn't very good for a lot of reasons...instability of calibration being one. The "Red Ball" service centers, which serviced all that stuff at various WECO plants and depots across the country, would routinely slop WECO grey paint on a "repaired" unit...why, I never had a clue. I shipped a lot of WECO test gear to the City of Industry WECO plant (a huge 1930s storage depot) on Yates St., and more often than not, it would come back in the same shape it was sent out. Smart engineers would order non-company test gear and eschew the WECO and KS-spec test gear altogether. Thus, in carrier work, we had a ton of Wandel-Goltermann SLMs and oscillators, while the job-supplied WECO stuff sat on the shelf, basically useless. KS-spec'd stuff was usually not very good, either. An example here was the 28A Microwave Analyzer Set for the Type TN-1 (11 GHz) microwave radio system, made to KS spec. for WECO by Hewlett-Packard. Although every piece in that rolling equipment bay was based on a familiar H-P chassis, WECO engineers, to make it look and act like a distinct unit, would speicify many circuit changes to differentiate their KS unit from an "off-the-shelf" H-P unit. This would make the gear, whether the scope, sweep generator or whatever, practically useless for any other application. The circuit mods provided by WECO engineers would more often than not be a failure, and the thing would sit, unused, while the transmission engineer would order an "off-the-shelf" H-P MLA to replace it, and all would be well. The same went for video test equipment made to KS-spec by Tektronix. Stock Tek gear would work and do the job...perfectly...while the KS-spec unit would be totally useless. A lot is written in lore about the quality of WECO equipment, and in many cases, these legends are true. Their toll central office gear was built to last 100 years up until the '70s, and it most certainly would. However, there was a lot of just plain bad engineering and poor design that started popping up around the 1960s that most people won't talk about. Fine...let the Japs have all the crap. Most of it is useless, anyway, and after around 1965, better test gear could be had by any number of manufacturers. Perhaps someone reading this has the service notes and would send a good copy or scan to one of the boatanchor or test Web sites where they put manuals so we can all see this. Probably out of copyright now. snip Any old WECO manuals are way out of copyright. However, be careful about Bell System Practices..."BSPs" that were used as encyclopaedic manuals on how to run a telephone company. Even the long obsolete portions of the BSPs (later ACPs, "AT&T Company Practices") have been dutifully copyright renewed by the "old" AT&T and they were well known to go after flagrant violators. However, now that AT&T no longer exists and is now a rebadged SBC, it's anyone's guess what their policy is. I do know one thing...the "new" AT&T has screwed up pension and benefits programs for hundreds of thousands of us old farts! Three months later and I still can't get my dentist paid! |
#27
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,rec.antiques.radio+phono,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Charles Schuler wrote:
And the purpose of this post is? Depressurization. -- And if a cow had wheels, it would be a milk truck. - Steve Linford |
#28
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,rec.antiques.radio+phono,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Japs hare crazy. They go after WECO gear because it's "top line American stuff" from the golden age of US technology. In actuality, WECO transformers were all special design for each application, and weren't all that great. The output transformers on the 101A, for example, produce copious amounts of third harmonic, which the negative feedback loop cancels. Any Stancor would be better at coupling audio. They don't seem to want it for test gear. They part it out for the transformers. And they are not good transformers. I used a similar beast where I worked a long time ago. It was not a 19C, I don't remember the designation. It had the female longframe jacks for output and the manual indicated it was for 110 VAC-DC but that a 48V Co version was available. No one else seems to know what I am talking about and you seem legit Bell. snip Let's see...there was the 21-set, which was a combined AF oscillator and voltmeter that answers that description somewhat. The voltmeter, while not true RMS reading, had a novel tube driven scaling circuit that'd take the incoming sine wave and convert the DC to the meter to be fed to a panel meter calibrated in dB in linear increments...much ado about nothing, really. 21As were very common until the end of my toll CO career in the '80s. eBay has none currently. 180076938888 appears to be one item number now sold. Buyer's in the United States oddly enough. But that's not the set I used. What's bizarre is that there are TWO listed in Google as being sold for the same amount of $343.00 Same bider. One has a black front and one off-white to gray green. 180076938868. Bizarre. |
#29
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,rec.antiques.radio+phono,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In .com "Bret Ludwig" writes:
On Mar 18, 5:45 pm, wrote: In rec.antiques.radio+phono Bret Ludwig wrote: The answer to your question is obvious to most, but since you asked, it's that we have a eBay vendor who is trying to sell something for an inasne amount of money and we are entitled to a little sport with him. Also this is not a common piece at all-it has to be late 1920s construction. The later poster is confusing this with the AC powered metal case 19C, I think, which was thick on the land until orientals started buying them for their not very good transformers. Anyway, you stated earlier you have conserved 2 of those, and no doubt others have them in their collections as well. I still fail to see what is the big problem to selling the remaining units to be used for parts, even if the takers are 'fools'... You can't hoard and keep all nice stuff for yourself, it would be impractical to never recycle stuff. As long as some examples are being preserved by caring individuals all seems well to me. They should make new ones instead of buying up all our stuff. We should make it tough for them to buy it all up. The 19C is not a huge loss to society but they are driving prices on everything now, except Dynajunk. We need to think nationalistically to some extent. Someone is paying lots of money for an obsolete piece of equipment no one else wants. Why is this bad for the United States? If denizens of another country started forking over cold, hard cash for old truck tires, would this also be bad? If I lived in Hoilland I would support the Dutch version of the BNP or "Die Partei" (NPD). If you lived in Holland you'd freak out. The Dutch are quite happy to do business regardless of where you live, what color you are, or how many arms and legs you happen to have. New York City was born as an economic engine precisely because they didn't think someone was unworthy of buying or selling because they happend to worship a different diety, or any other non-business bias. -- Tim Mullen ------------------------------------------------------------------ Am I in your basement? Looking for antique televisions, fans, etc. ------ finger this account or call anytime: (212)-463-0552 ------- |
#30
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,rec.antiques.radio+phono,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Previously on rec.antiques.radio+phono and simulcast in other
markets... Tim Mullen ------------------------------------------------------------------ Am I in your basement? Looking for antique televisions, fans, etc. ------ finger this account or call anytime: (212)-463-0552 If you're under the house, I'm going to seal that hole to keep the cats out. |
#31
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,rec.antiques.radio+phono,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Western Electric Oscillator 11-A with (x4) 231D triodes
Item number: 260097248657 Seller of this item? Sign in for your status Bidding has ended for this item Buyer or seller of this item? Sign in for your status. Additional options: Sell an item like this one. Starting bid: US $739.00 Ended: Mar-21-07 19:52:05 PDT Shipping costs: US $35.00 Standard Flat Rate Shipping Service Service to United States Ships to: Worldwide Item location: Portland, Oregon, United States History: 0 bids You can also: Email to a friend Listing and payment details: HideShow Starting time: Mar-14-07 19:52:05 PDT Starting bid: US $739.00 Meet the seller Seller: tube( 376Feedback score is 100 to 499) Feedback: 99.7% Positive Member: since Apr-12-98 in United States Read feedback comments Add to Favorite Sellers View seller's other items Contact the seller instantly |
#32
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,rec.antiques.radio+phono,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bret Ludwig wrote:
Western Electric Oscillator 11-A with (x4) 231D triodes Item number: 260097248657 Seller of this item? Sign in for your status Bidding has ended for this item -- snipped --- Please don't post this off topic stuff to r.a.r+p. Thanks. |
#33
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,rec.antiques.radio+phono,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 22, 7:15 am, Fred Wesner
wrote: Bret Ludwig wrote: Western Electric Oscillator 11-A with (x4) 231D triodes Item number: 260097248657 Seller of this item? Sign in for your status Bidding has ended for this item -- snipped --- Please don't post this off topic stuff to r.a.r+p. Thanks. Aw, geebus Fred, that works for all the time you've spent in ba.broadcast. For that matter, I might as well invite somebody to post stupid swipes at me there now...probably overdue. They have to have new people to ignore, you know. |
#34
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,rec.antiques.radio+phono,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Please don't post this off topic stuff to r.a.r+p. Thanks. It's on topic. |
#35
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,rec.antiques.radio+phono,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
" wrote:
On Mar 18, 10:25 am, "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: " wrote: On Mar 18, 9:29 am, Eeyore wrote: This is *USENET* ! No, internet also. I access this USENET group through Google Groups, via a web browser and the internet, that way I can access it from any computer without needing special newsreader software or news server access. For other USENET groups, I access through a news server and news reader. Its still Usenet, no matter how you access it. Right. I didn't say it wasn't USENET. It's both, not ONLY one or the other. Not for me. I use a real usenet news server, no HTML interface to get in the way. -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: Brand-new STAINLESS "CINCH" TUBE SHIELDS & SOCKETS @$10 | Electronics Repair | |||
Orange Peel Texture? "Knockdown" or "Skip Trowel" also "California Knock-down" | Home Repair | |||
Trimming a "shade" for a 4 tube florescent(sp?) fixture | Home Repair |