http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,516886,00.html

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I'll keep my guns, freedom, and money. You can keep the change.

"Jim Thompson" wrote in
message ...
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,516886,00.html

Of course Oliver North is an extremist -- that should be obvious. But when
did "extreme" come to automatically mean "bad?" North does well to quote
Barry Goldwater's words.

Throughout time, those with strong-hold beliefs and military training were
clearly some of the more dangerous people any government has to worry about.
Just as love and hate are largely two sides of the same coin, so is patriotism
and terrorism... with people crossing from one side to the other more often
than we'd like to admit. I don't think North makes a compelling case that the
government is really out to get him or those like him, however -- it sounds as
though the report is largely factual. In a perverse sense it's a compliment
that those on the right are recognized as generally being more organized,
having better training and being more willing to translate their beliefs into
strong actions than those on the left.

North doesn't make a good case for "the report reminds us that Timothy McVeigh
was a veteran, thus suggesting all veterans are nut jobs -- how slanderous!"
either -- he'd do better if he could dig up some statistics citing what
percentage of those involved in terrorist activities happened to have been
veterans vs. those who weren't. If there's not much difference, then he has a
case. But if vets statistically tend to become terrorists far more often than
non-vets... well, who's more likely to get an extended search at airport these
days -- an Islamic middle-eaterner or a fourth-generation farmer from
Minnesota?

Just as North would rightfully call on peaceful Muslims in the U.S. to condemn
the actions of radical Muslims in the middle east who commit acts of
terrorism, he should call on his fellow conservatives who legally exercise
their rights to free speech and to bear arms (more power to them) to condemn
those who have given up on the government and resort to terrorism in out own
country. Right-wingers have many reasons to dislike the current
administration, but I don't think one can seriously argue the country's gone
so far to Hell in a handbasket that the founding father's "escape clause" --
people taking up arms and removing the government by force -- ought to come
into play. The tree of liberty doesn't need refreshing with blood *quite*
yet, IMO.

---Joel

On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:44:34 -0700, "Joel Koltner"
wrote:

"Jim Thompson" wrote in
message ...
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,516886,00.html

Of course Oliver North is an extremist -- that should be obvious. But when
did "extreme" come to automatically mean "bad?" North does well to quote
Barry Goldwater's words.

Throughout time, those with strong-hold beliefs and military training were
clearly some of the more dangerous people any government has to worry about.
Just as love and hate are largely two sides of the same coin, so is patriotism
and terrorism... with people crossing from one side to the other more often
than we'd like to admit. I don't think North makes a compelling case that the
government is really out to get him or those like him, however -- it sounds as
though the report is largely factual. In a perverse sense it's a compliment
that those on the right are recognized as generally being more organized,
having better training and being more willing to translate their beliefs into
strong actions than those on the left.

North doesn't make a good case for "the report reminds us that Timothy McVeigh
was a veteran, thus suggesting all veterans are nut jobs -- how slanderous!"
either -- he'd do better if he could dig up some statistics citing what
percentage of those involved in terrorist activities happened to have been
veterans vs. those who weren't. If there's not much difference, then he has a
case. But if vets statistically tend to become terrorists far more often than
non-vets... well, who's more likely to get an extended search at airport these
days -- an Islamic middle-eaterner or a fourth-generation farmer from
Minnesota?

Just as North would rightfully call on peaceful Muslims in the U.S. to condemn
the actions of radical Muslims in the middle east who commit acts of
terrorism, he should call on his fellow conservatives who legally exercise
their rights to free speech and to bear arms (more power to them) to condemn
those who have given up on the government and resort to terrorism in out own
country. Right-wingers have many reasons to dislike the current
administration, but I don't think one can seriously argue the country's gone
so far to Hell in a handbasket that the founding father's "escape clause" --
people taking up arms and removing the government by force -- ought to come
into play. The tree of liberty doesn't need refreshing with blood *quite*
yet, IMO.

---Joel


Did you actually read Napolitano's report?

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

"What would happen to [Obama's] vanity if he didnt have us to
throw alms to? What would become of his strength if he didnt have
weaker people to dominate? What would he do with himself if he
didnt keep us around as dependents? Its quite alright, really,
Im not criticizing him, its just a law of human nature."

-Ayn Rand, "Atlas Shrugged"

Jim Thompson wrote:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,516886,00.html

I would certainly say that his selling Hawk antiaircraft missiles to Iran
might make Ollie an exteremist. =)

Jim Thompson wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:44:34 -0700, "Joel Koltner"
wrote:

"Jim Thompson"
wrote in message ...
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,516886,00.html

Of course Oliver North is an extremist -- that should be obvious.
But when did "extreme" come to automatically mean "bad?" North does
well to quote Barry Goldwater's words.

Throughout time, those with strong-hold beliefs and military
training were clearly some of the more dangerous people any
government has to worry about. Just as love and hate are largely two
sides of the same coin, so is patriotism and terrorism... with
people crossing from one side to the other more often than we'd like
to admit. I don't think North makes a compelling case that the
government is really out to get him or those like him, however -- it
sounds as though the report is largely factual. In a perverse sense
it's a compliment that those on the right are recognized as
generally being more organized, having better training and being
more willing to translate their beliefs into strong actions than
those on the left.

North doesn't make a good case for "the report reminds us that
Timothy McVeigh was a veteran, thus suggesting all veterans are nut
jobs -- how slanderous!" either -- he'd do better if he could dig up
some statistics citing what percentage of those involved in
terrorist activities happened to have been veterans vs. those who
weren't. If there's not much difference, then he has a case. But
if vets statistically tend to become terrorists far more often than
non-vets... well, who's more likely to get an extended search at
airport these days -- an Islamic middle-eaterner or a
fourth-generation farmer from Minnesota?

Just as North would rightfully call on peaceful Muslims in the U.S.
to condemn the actions of radical Muslims in the middle east who
commit acts of terrorism, he should call on his fellow conservatives
who legally exercise their rights to free speech and to bear arms
(more power to them) to condemn those who have given up on the
government and resort to terrorism in out own country.
Right-wingers have many reasons to dislike the current
administration, but I don't think one can seriously argue the
country's gone so far to Hell in a handbasket that the founding
father's "escape clause" -- people taking up arms and removing the
government by force -- ought to come into play. The tree of liberty
doesn't need refreshing with blood *quite* yet, IMO.

---Joel


Did you actually read Napolitano's report?

Did you? I'm particularly interested in whether or not you can tell us
what it said about left wing extremist groups.

Joel Koltner wrote:
"Jim Thompson" wrote
in message ...
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,516886,00.html

Of course Oliver North is an extremist -- that should be obvious. But when
did "extreme" come to automatically mean "bad?" North does
well to quote Barry Goldwater's words.

Throughout time, those with strong-hold beliefs and military training
were clearly some of the more dangerous people any government has to
worry about. Just as love and hate are largely two sides of the same
coin, so is patriotism and terrorism... with people crossing from one
side to the other more often than we'd like to admit. I don't think
North makes a compelling case that the government is really out to
get him or those like him, however -- it sounds as though the report
is largely factual. In a perverse sense it's a compliment that those
on the right are recognized as generally being more organized, having
better training and being more willing to translate their beliefs
into strong actions than those on the left.
North doesn't make a good case for "the report reminds us that
Timothy McVeigh was a veteran, thus suggesting all veterans are nut
jobs -- how slanderous!" either -- he'd do better if he could dig up
some statistics citing what percentage of those involved in terrorist
activities happened to have been veterans vs. those who weren't. If
there's not much difference, then he has a case. But if vets
statistically tend to become terrorists far more often than
non-vets... well, who's more likely to get an extended search at
airport these days -- an Islamic middle-eaterner or a
fourth-generation farmer from Minnesota?
Just as North would rightfully call on peaceful Muslims in the U.S.
to condemn the actions of radical Muslims in the middle east who
commit acts of terrorism, he should call on his fellow conservatives
who legally exercise their rights to free speech and to bear arms
(more power to them) to condemn those who have given up on the
government and resort to terrorism in out own country. Right-wingers
have many reasons to dislike the current administration, but I don't
think one can seriously argue the country's gone so far to Hell in a
handbasket that the founding father's "escape clause" -- people
taking up arms and removing the government by force -- ought to come
into play. The tree of liberty doesn't need refreshing with blood
*quite* yet, IMO.
---Joel

Ollie the missile hawker wants to claim that mentioning that group A often
contains one or more people of type B means that everyone in A is a B.

How dumb does somebody have to be to believe that? Traitor Ollie does.
lol

"Jim Thompson" wrote in
message ...
Did you actually read Napolitano's report?

No, just North's commentary on it.

On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:20:00 -0700, "Joel Koltner"
wrote:

"Jim Thompson" wrote in
message ...
Did you actually read Napolitano's report?

No, just North's commentary on it.


Napolitano is the one who inserts Timothy McVeigh into the report as a
"typical" conversion of a soldier to an extremist.

Napolitano is a real piece-a-work. We Arizonans are so glad we were
able to foist her off on Obama and get a real governor replacement ;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

Lord protect me from queers, fairies and Democrats

Jim Thompson wrote:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,516886,00.html

I didn't think you had any time for deities ( quite the reverse ), so
your link shows you to be somewhat shallow.

Graham

Jim Thompson wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:20:00 -0700, "Joel Koltner"
wrote:

"Jim Thompson"
wrote in message ...
Did you actually read Napolitano's report?

No, just North's commentary on it.


Napolitano is the one who inserts Timothy McVeigh into the report as a
"typical" conversion of a soldier to an extremist.

Suuuure she does. lol



Napolitano is a real piece-a-work. We Arizonans are so glad we were
able to foist her off on Obama and get a real governor replacement ;-)

...Jim Thompson
James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
Voice480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

Lord protect me from queers, fairies and Democrats

"Jim Thompson" schreef in
bericht ...

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,516886,00.html

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I'll keep my guns, freedom, and money. You can keep the change.

I'd call you a rightest grumbler

Joel Koltner wrote:

"Jim Thompson" wrote

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,516886,00.html

Of course Oliver North is an extremist -- that should be obvious. But when
did "extreme" come to automatically mean "bad?"

The Spanish Inquisition, the Taleban etc ?

Graham

marcodbeast wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

Did you actually read Napolitano's report?

Did you? I'm particularly interested in whether or not you can tell us
what it said about left wing extremist groups.

About as bad as right wing extremist groups most likely.

Graham

Jim Thompson wrote:

Napolitano is the one who inserts Timothy McVeigh into the report as a
"typical" conversion of a soldier to an extremist.

And isn't that what happened ? Of course he was of low intellect, which made
the conversion easy.

Graham

On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 23:55:46 +0200, "petrus bitbyter"
wrote:


"Jim Thompson" schreef in
bericht ...

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,516886,00.html

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I'll keep my guns, freedom, and money. You can keep the change.

I'd call you a rightest grumbler

His powder is probably wet too.

On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:59:18 +0100, Eeyore
wrote:



Joel Koltner wrote:

"Jim Thompson" wrote

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,516886,00.html

Of course Oliver North is an extremist -- that should be obvious. But when
did "extreme" come to automatically mean "bad?"

The Spanish Inquisition, the Taleban etc ?

Graham


Do you spell everything wrong?

TALIBAN

Archimedes' Lever wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
Joel Koltner wrote:
"Jim Thompson" wrote

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,516886,00.html

Of course Oliver North is an extremist -- that should be obvious. But when
did "extreme" come to automatically mean "bad?"

The Spanish Inquisition, the Taleban etc ?

Do you spell everything wrong?

TALIBAN

There is no accepted Arab - English spelling because the languages are
fundamentally different. Arabic is based on sound, not letter by letter spelling.

See also Moslem or Muslim. Koran or Quran.

Now shove off you pedantic ignoramus. I hope you've learnt something for once ( and
yes learnt is the correct spelling here ).

Graham

petrus bitbyter wrote:

"Jim Thompson" schreef

I'll keep my guns, freedom, and money. You can keep the change.

I'd call you a rightest grumbler

The rightist is correct but superfluous in this instance ! ;~)

Graham

On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 16:43:28 +0100, Eeyore
wrote:



Archimedes' Lever wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
Joel Koltner wrote:
"Jim Thompson" wrote

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,516886,00.html

Of course Oliver North is an extremist -- that should be obvious. But when
did "extreme" come to automatically mean "bad?"

The Spanish Inquisition, the Taleban etc ?

Do you spell everything wrong?

TALIBAN

There is no accepted Arab - English spelling because the languages are
fundamentally different. Arabic is based on sound, not letter by letter spelling.

See also Moslem or Muslim. Koran or Quran.

Now shove off you pedantic ignoramus. I hope you've learnt something for once ( and
yes learnt is the correct spelling here ).

Graham



Do a web search. The accepted spelling for English speaking nations
has always been Taliban, dip****.

In this tally, you should be banned. Tally banned.

Archimedes' Lever wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
Archimedes' Lever wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Joel Koltner wrote:
"Jim Thompson" wrote

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,516886,00.html

Of course Oliver North is an extremist -- that should be obvious. But when
did "extreme" come to automatically mean "bad?"

The Spanish Inquisition, the Taleban etc ?

Do you spell everything wrong?

TALIBAN

There is no accepted Arab - English spelling because the languages are
fundamentally different. Arabic is based on sound, not letter by letter spelling.

See also Moslem or Muslim. Koran or Quran.

Now shove off you pedantic ignoramus. I hope you've learnt something for once ( and
yes learnt is the correct spelling here ).

Do a web search. The accepted spelling for English speaking nations
has always been Taliban, dip****.

PURE ****.

http://www.google.com/search?&rls=en&q=taleban

Graham

On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 19:08:02 +0100, Eeyore
wrote:



Archimedes' Lever wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
Archimedes' Lever wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Joel Koltner wrote:
"Jim Thompson" wrote

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,516886,00.html

Of course Oliver North is an extremist -- that should be obvious. But when
did "extreme" come to automatically mean "bad?"

The Spanish Inquisition, the Taleban etc ?

Do you spell everything wrong?

TALIBAN

There is no accepted Arab - English spelling because the languages are
fundamentally different. Arabic is based on sound, not letter by letter spelling.

See also Moslem or Muslim. Koran or Quran.

Now shove off you pedantic ignoramus. I hope you've learnt something for once ( and
yes learnt is the correct spelling here ).

Do a web search. The accepted spelling for English speaking nations
has always been Taliban, dip****.

PURE ****.

http://www.google.com/search?&rls=en&q=taleban

Graham


Dumbass. Right at the top of the page, it says "Did you mean "Taliban"?

My search, however, does not 'suggest' a misspelling.


Also, your search yields 1.4 M results.

Mine yields 19 M results. More than an order of magnitude difference.

Yes... the PURE **** was all yours.

Archimedes' Lever wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
Archimedes' Lever wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Archimedes' Lever wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Joel Koltner wrote:
"Jim Thompson" wrote

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,516886,00.html

Of course Oliver North is an extremist -- that should be obvious. But when
did "extreme" come to automatically mean "bad?"

The Spanish Inquisition, the Taleban etc ?

Do you spell everything wrong?

TALIBAN

There is no accepted Arab - English spelling because the languages are
fundamentally different. Arabic is based on sound, not letter by letter spelling.

See also Moslem or Muslim. Koran or Quran.

Now shove off you pedantic ignoramus. I hope you've learnt something for once ( and
yes learnt is the correct spelling here ).

Do a web search. The accepted spelling for English speaking nations
has always been Taliban, dip****.

PURE ****.

http://www.google.com/search?&rls=en&q=taleban

Graham

Dumbass. Right at the top of the page, it says "Did you mean "Taliban"?

NO. NOW **** OFF.

If Taleban is good enough for the BBC, it's good enough for me.

Haven't you got something worthwhile to do ? Oh no, probably not except playing computer
games on your super-whizzo PC.

Graham

On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 20:23:29 +0100, Eeyore
wrote:



Archimedes' Lever wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
Archimedes' Lever wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Archimedes' Lever wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Joel Koltner wrote:
"Jim Thompson" wrote

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,516886,00.html

Of course Oliver North is an extremist -- that should be obvious. But when
did "extreme" come to automatically mean "bad?"

The Spanish Inquisition, the Taleban etc ?

Do you spell everything wrong?

TALIBAN

There is no accepted Arab - English spelling because the languages are
fundamentally different. Arabic is based on sound, not letter by letter spelling.

See also Moslem or Muslim. Koran or Quran.

Now shove off you pedantic ignoramus. I hope you've learnt something for once ( and
yes learnt is the correct spelling here ).

Do a web search. The accepted spelling for English speaking nations
has always been Taliban, dip****.

PURE ****.

http://www.google.com/search?&rls=en&q=taleban

Graham

Dumbass. Right at the top of the page, it says "Did you mean "Taliban"?

If Taleban is good enough for the BBC, it's good enough for me.


Your search yields 1.4 M results.

Mine yields 19 M results.

Most of the world disagrees with you AND the BBC.

On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 16:43:28 +0100, the renowned Eeyore
wrote:



Archimedes' Lever wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
Joel Koltner wrote:
"Jim Thompson" wrote

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,516886,00.html

Of course Oliver North is an extremist -- that should be obvious. But when
did "extreme" come to automatically mean "bad?"

The Spanish Inquisition, the Taleban etc ?

Do you spell everything wrong?

TALIBAN

There is no accepted Arab - English spelling because the languages are
fundamentally different. Arabic is based on sound, not letter by letter spelling.

What about Pashto?



Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
--
"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com

On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 19:06:07 -0500, flipper wrote:

On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 16:02:01 +0100, Eeyore
wrote:



Jim Thompson wrote:

Napolitano is the one who inserts Timothy McVeigh into the report as a
"typical" conversion of a soldier to an extremist.

And isn't that what happened ? Of course he was of low intellect, which made
the conversion easy.

Graham

The 'conversion' took place when Janet Reno barbecued dozens of
children at Waco.

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine Sometimes I even put it in the food

On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 19:06:07 -0500, flipper wrote:

On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 16:02:01 +0100, Eeyore
wrote:



Jim Thompson wrote:

Napolitano is the one who inserts Timothy McVeigh into the report as a
"typical" conversion of a soldier to an extremist.

And isn't that what happened ? Of course he was of low intellect, which made
the conversion easy.

Graham

The 'conversion' took place when Janet Reno barbecued dozens of
children at Waco.

Please don't troll feed the Eeyore jerk. Shun him. Let him die
that most unpleasant of deaths... alone... without a friend.

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:26:14 -0500, flipper wrote:

On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 17:40:30 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 19:06:07 -0500, flipper wrote:

On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 16:02:01 +0100, Eeyore
wrote:



Jim Thompson wrote:

Napolitano is the one who inserts Timothy McVeigh into the report as a
"typical" conversion of a soldier to an extremist.

And isn't that what happened ? Of course he was of low intellect, which made
the conversion easy.

Graham

The 'conversion' took place when Janet Reno barbecued dozens of
children at Waco.

Please don't troll feed the Eeyore jerk. Shun him. Let him die
that most unpleasant of deaths... alone... without a friend.

...Jim Thompson

I understand what you mean but I think the right leaving the left's
ranting's largely unchallenged has resulted in a domestic version of
Hitler's 'Big Lie' theory.

Yep. All politics is a variation on that old French vignette... "What
woman?" ;-)

Or global warming, or carbon credits/cap & trade, bail-outs, no secret
ballot for union elections...... I knew Obama would be problematic,
but I never dreamed that it would be to this degree :-(


... in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility;
because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted
in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or
voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they
more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since
they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be
ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into
their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe
that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so
infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be
brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and
will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For
the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it
has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in
this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying.

Adolf Hitler , Mein Kampf, vol. I, ch. X


The effect is bad enough when challenged but unchallenged it can be
disastrous.

I believe in challenging... I write enough letters-to-the-editor that
I figure I'll be getting a visit, maybe even arrested, one of these
days... welcome to the Democratic Peoples Republic of America :-(

But Eeyore? He's a simple mental case, like Slowman, and should be
ignored.

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

In Memoriam...
Duane Lee Thompson
October 31, 1972 - April 20,2006
4th Child, 2nd Son, of Jim & Naomi Thompson
Victim of Colon Cancer

On 2009-04-18, Archimedes' Lever wrote:


Do a web search. The accepted spelling for English speaking nations
has always been Taliban, dip****.

In this tally, you should be banned. Tally banned.

They forbid the use of modern technology.

Therfore it's "Telly Ban"

Archimedes' Lever wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
Archimedes' Lever wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Archimedes' Lever wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Archimedes' Lever wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Joel Koltner wrote:
"Jim Thompson" wrote

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,516886,00.html

Of course Oliver North is an extremist -- that should be obvious. But when
did "extreme" come to automatically mean "bad?"

The Spanish Inquisition, the Taleban etc ?

Do you spell everything wrong?

TALIBAN

There is no accepted Arab - English spelling because the languages are
fundamentally different. Arabic is based on sound, not letter by letter spelling.

See also Moslem or Muslim. Koran or Quran.

Now shove off you pedantic ignoramus. I hope you've learnt something for once ( and
yes learnt is the correct spelling here ).

Do a web search. The accepted spelling for English speaking nations
has always been Taliban, dip****.

PURE ****.

http://www.google.com/search?&rls=en&q=taleban

Graham

Dumbass. Right at the top of the page, it says "Did you mean "Taliban"?

If Taleban is good enough for the BBC, it's good enough for me.

Your search yields 1.4 M results.

Mine yields 19 M results.

Most of the world disagrees with you AND the BBC.

I don't give a ****. Translation of Arabic to English yields many variations.

Even Al Jazeera uses both

http://english.aljazeera.net/news/as...104324659.html
" The Taleban claimed responsibility for the Kandahar attack in which the car bomb struck an
armoured vehicle. "

http://english.aljazeera.net/news/as...205979164.html
" Attacks on security forces by fighters linked to al-Qaeda and the Taliban are common in
Pakistan in the last two years, but incidents in Mianwali have been rare. "

http://english.aljazeera.net/archive...943425344.html
" With fighting still continuing, Afghans began a national debate on the constitution to
determine the future of their country, less than two years after the ousting of the Taleban
regime. "

So stick that in your pipe and smoke it.

Graham

Jim Thompson wrote:

Please don't troll feed the Eeyore jerk. Shun him. Let him die
that most unpleasant of deaths... alone... without a friend.

You really are becoming most unpleasant. Something common amongst extreme
right-wingers I've noticed.

Graham

Archimedes' Lever wrote:
On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 20:23:29 +0100, Eeyore
wrote:



Archimedes' Lever wrote:


Eeyore wrote:

Archimedes' Lever wrote:

Eeyore wrote:

Archimedes' Lever wrote:

Eeyore wrote:

Joel Koltner wrote:

"Jim Thompson" wrote


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,516886,00.html

Of course Oliver North is an extremist -- that should be obvious. But when
did "extreme" come to automatically mean "bad?"

The Spanish Inquisition, the Taleban etc ?

Do you spell everything wrong?

TALIBAN

There is no accepted Arab - English spelling because the languages are
fundamentally different. Arabic is based on sound, not letter by letter spelling.

See also Moslem or Muslim. Koran or Quran.

Now shove off you pedantic ignoramus. I hope you've learnt something for once ( and
yes learnt is the correct spelling here ).

Do a web search. The accepted spelling for English speaking nations
has always been Taliban, dip****.

PURE ****.

http://www.google.com/search?&rls=en&q=taleban

Graham

Dumbass. Right at the top of the page, it says "Did you mean "Taliban"?


If Taleban is good enough for the BBC, it's good enough for me.



Your search yields 1.4 M results.

Mine yields 19 M results.

Most of the world disagrees with you AND the BBC.

I don't - and I think that you're a pillock for constantly bringing up British spelling.
Perhaps we should all complain when you misspell colour.

Generally the US dumbs down everything.
For instance they use "levo" instead of "laevo" - because they are (pig) ignorant of its etymology - in this case latin.

On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:53:26 +0100, richard
wrote:

Archimedes' Lever wrote:
On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 20:23:29 +0100, Eeyore
wrote:



Archimedes' Lever wrote:


Eeyore wrote:

Archimedes' Lever wrote:

Eeyore wrote:

Archimedes' Lever wrote:

Eeyore wrote:

Joel Koltner wrote:

"Jim Thompson" wrote


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,516886,00.html

Of course Oliver North is an extremist -- that should be obvious. But when
did "extreme" come to automatically mean "bad?"

The Spanish Inquisition, the Taleban etc ?

Do you spell everything wrong?

TALIBAN

There is no accepted Arab - English spelling because the languages are
fundamentally different. Arabic is based on sound, not letter by letter spelling.

See also Moslem or Muslim. Koran or Quran.

Now shove off you pedantic ignoramus. I hope you've learnt something for once ( and
yes learnt is the correct spelling here ).

Do a web search. The accepted spelling for English speaking nations
has always been Taliban, dip****.

PURE ****.

http://www.google.com/search?&rls=en&q=taleban

Graham

Dumbass. Right at the top of the page, it says "Did you mean "Taliban"?


If Taleban is good enough for the BBC, it's good enough for me.



Your search yields 1.4 M results.

Mine yields 19 M results.

Most of the world disagrees with you AND the BBC.

I don't - and I think that you're a pillock for constantly bringing up British spelling.
Perhaps we should all complain when you misspell colour.

I spell COLOR just fine, asswipe.

Generally the US dumbs down everything.

No. The US allowed the English language to naturally evolve into the
better language we have today.

Your 'olde English' CRAP, is mostly stubbornness. It really is pretty
goddamned stupid too.

For instance they use "levo" instead of "laevo" - because they are (pig) ignorant of its etymology - in this case latin.

We know all about etymology. That's the whole point. It is very easy
to see what words' origins are. That doesn't mean that words do not
evolve. Would you like to see several thousand examples where you stupid
****s morphed a word to your liking?

Grow the **** up, you colorless ditz.

Maybe for a dweeb like you it is difficult.

Archimedes' Lever wrote:

I spell COLOR just fine, asswipe.

Except it's not ENGLISH.

Graham

Archimedes' Lever wrote:

No. The US allowed the English language to naturally evolve into the
better language we have today.

There is NOTHING better about US English, you pompous asshole.

Graham

On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 17:28:20 +0100, Eeyore
wrote:



Archimedes' Lever wrote:

I spell COLOR just fine, asswipe.

Except it's not ENGLISH.

Graham

Yes, it is.

One, talking about displays, would say "pixel coloration", not "pixel
colouration".

Archimedes' Lever wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
Archimedes' Lever wrote:

I spell COLOR just fine, asswipe.

Except it's not ENGLISH.

Graham

Yes, it is.

It's the *******ised US version.


One, talking about displays, would say "pixel coloration", not "pixel
colouration".

YOU would but I can't help your illiteracy.

Graham

Eeyore wrote:

Archimedes' Lever wrote:


No. The US allowed the English language to naturally evolve into the
better language we have today.


There is NOTHING better about US English, you pompous asshole.


Seconded

Archimedes' Lever wrote:
On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:53:26 +0100, richard
wrote:


Archimedes' Lever wrote:

On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 20:23:29 +0100, Eeyore
wrote:



Archimedes' Lever wrote:



Eeyore wrote:


Archimedes' Lever wrote:


Eeyore wrote:


Archimedes' Lever wrote:


Eeyore wrote:


Joel Koltner wrote:


"Jim Thompson" wrote



http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,516886,00.html

Of course Oliver North is an extremist -- that should be obvious. But when
did "extreme" come to automatically mean "bad?"

The Spanish Inquisition, the Taleban etc ?

Do you spell everything wrong?

TALIBAN

There is no accepted Arab - English spelling because the languages are
fundamentally different. Arabic is based on sound, not letter by letter spelling.

See also Moslem or Muslim. Koran or Quran.

Now shove off you pedantic ignoramus. I hope you've learnt something for once ( and
yes learnt is the correct spelling here ).

Do a web search. The accepted spelling for English speaking nations
has always been Taliban, dip****.

PURE ****.

http://www.google.com/search?&rls=en&q=taleban

Graham

Dumbass. Right at the top of the page, it says "Did you mean "Taliban"?


If Taleban is good enough for the BBC, it's good enough for me.



Your search yields 1.4 M results.

Mine yields 19 M results.

Most of the world disagrees with you AND the BBC.

I don't - and I think that you're a pillock for constantly bringing up British spelling.
Perhaps we should all complain when you misspell colour.


I spell COLOR just fine, asswipe.


Generally the US dumbs down everything.


No. The US allowed the English language to naturally evolve into the
better language we have today.

Your 'olde English' CRAP, is mostly stubbornness. It really is pretty
goddamned stupid too.


For instance they use "levo" instead of "laevo" - because they are (pig) ignorant of its etymology - in this case latin.


We know all about etymology. That's the whole point. It is very easy
to see what words' origins are. That doesn't mean that words do not
evolve. Would you like to see several thousand examples where you stupid
****s morphed a word to your liking?

Grow the **** up, you colorless ditz.

Maybe for a dweeb like you it is difficult.

You just cannot understand can you. It is not that we are ignorant, or quaint in our language, it is just that you are
prejudiced and ignorant.

Let me put it in a way that you might understand and which shows the continuing vitality of British usage:-
You are not an ass - you are an ARSE.

We retain this word with you in mind.
Your language is the poorer for its disuse.

On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 23:26:58 +0100, richard
wrote:

Archimedes' Lever wrote:
On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:53:26 +0100, richard
wrote:


Archimedes' Lever wrote:

On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 20:23:29 +0100, Eeyore
wrote:



Archimedes' Lever wrote:



Eeyore wrote:


Archimedes' Lever wrote:


Eeyore wrote:


Archimedes' Lever wrote:


Eeyore wrote:


Joel Koltner wrote:


"Jim Thompson" wrote



http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,516886,00.html

Of course Oliver North is an extremist -- that should be obvious. But when
did "extreme" come to automatically mean "bad?"

The Spanish Inquisition, the Taleban etc ?

Do you spell everything wrong?

TALIBAN

There is no accepted Arab - English spelling because the languages are
fundamentally different. Arabic is based on sound, not letter by letter spelling.

See also Moslem or Muslim. Koran or Quran.

Now shove off you pedantic ignoramus. I hope you've learnt something for once ( and
yes learnt is the correct spelling here ).

Do a web search. The accepted spelling for English speaking nations
has always been Taliban, dip****.

PURE ****.

http://www.google.com/search?&rls=en&q=taleban

Graham

Dumbass. Right at the top of the page, it says "Did you mean "Taliban"?


If Taleban is good enough for the BBC, it's good enough for me.



Your search yields 1.4 M results.

Mine yields 19 M results.

Most of the world disagrees with you AND the BBC.

I don't - and I think that you're a pillock for constantly bringing up British spelling.
Perhaps we should all complain when you misspell colour.


I spell COLOR just fine, asswipe.


Generally the US dumbs down everything.


No. The US allowed the English language to naturally evolve into the
better language we have today.

Your 'olde English' CRAP, is mostly stubbornness. It really is pretty
goddamned stupid too.


For instance they use "levo" instead of "laevo" - because they are (pig) ignorant of its etymology - in this case latin.


We know all about etymology. That's the whole point. It is very easy
to see what words' origins are. That doesn't mean that words do not
evolve. Would you like to see several thousand examples where you stupid
****s morphed a word to your liking?

Grow the **** up, you colorless ditz.

Maybe for a dweeb like you it is difficult.

You just cannot understand can you. It is not that we are ignorant, or quaint in our language, it is just that you are
prejudiced and ignorant.

Let me put it in a way that you might understand and which shows the continuing vitality of British usage:-
You are not an ass - you are an ARSE.

We retain this word with you in mind.
Your language is the poorer for its disuse.


I prefer to use just what I like and want to use, even mix and match,
like:

You are a bloody ass! Which you are, of course.

Archimedes' Lever wrote:
On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 23:26:58 +0100, richard
wrote:


Archimedes' Lever wrote:

On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:53:26 +0100, richard
wrote:



Archimedes' Lever wrote:


On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 20:23:29 +0100, Eeyore
wrote:




Archimedes' Lever wrote:




Eeyore wrote:



Archimedes' Lever wrote:



Eeyore wrote:



Archimedes' Lever wrote:



Eeyore wrote:



Joel Koltner wrote:



"Jim Thompson" wrote




http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,516886,00.html

Of course Oliver North is an extremist -- that should be obvious. But when
did "extreme" come to automatically mean "bad?"

The Spanish Inquisition, the Taleban etc ?

Do you spell everything wrong?

TALIBAN

There is no accepted Arab - English spelling because the languages are
fundamentally different. Arabic is based on sound, not letter by letter spelling.

See also Moslem or Muslim. Koran or Quran.

Now shove off you pedantic ignoramus. I hope you've learnt something for once ( and
yes learnt is the correct spelling here ).

Do a web search. The accepted spelling for English speaking nations
has always been Taliban, dip****.

PURE ****.

http://www.google.com/search?&rls=en&q=taleban

Graham

Dumbass. Right at the top of the page, it says "Did you mean "Taliban"?


If Taleban is good enough for the BBC, it's good enough for me.



Your search yields 1.4 M results.

Mine yields 19 M results.

Most of the world disagrees with you AND the BBC.

I don't - and I think that you're a pillock for constantly bringing up British spelling.
Perhaps we should all complain when you misspell colour.


I spell COLOR just fine, asswipe.



Generally the US dumbs down everything.


No. The US allowed the English language to naturally evolve into the
better language we have today.

Your 'olde English' CRAP, is mostly stubbornness. It really is pretty
goddamned stupid too.



For instance they use "levo" instead of "laevo" - because they are (pig) ignorant of its etymology - in this case latin.


We know all about etymology. That's the whole point. It is very easy
to see what words' origins are. That doesn't mean that words do not
evolve. Would you like to see several thousand examples where you stupid
****s morphed a word to your liking?

Grow the **** up, you colorless ditz.

Maybe for a dweeb like you it is difficult.

You just cannot understand can you. It is not that we are ignorant, or quaint in our language, it is just that you are
prejudiced and ignorant.

Let me put it in a way that you might understand and which shows the continuing vitality of British usage:-
You are not an ass - you are an ARSE.

We retain this word with you in mind.
Your language is the poorer for its disuse.



I prefer to use just what I like and want to use

Kindly accord us the same privilege.