http://www.bu.edu/es/labsafety/ESMSD...l#anchor948065

On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 15:25:24 GMT, the inscrutable "Steven and Gail
Peterson" spake:

http://www.bu.edu/es/labsafety/ESMSD...l#anchor948065

Whoever said it would kill you if you used it to get glue off your
hands should read this portion from the MSDS:

"Ingestion:
Swallowing small amounts is not likely to produce harmful effects."

'Nuff said?


--
EAT SOYLENT McD!
----------------------
http://diversify.com People-free Websites

On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 13:20:07 -0800, Larry Jaques novalidaddress@di wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 15:25:24 GMT, the inscrutable "Steven and Gail
Peterson" spake:

http://www.bu.edu/es/labsafety/ESMSD...l#anchor948065

Whoever said it would kill you if you used it to get glue off your
hands should read this portion from the MSDS:

"Ingestion:
Swallowing small amounts is not likely to produce harmful effects."

'Nuff said?

Well, _I_ thought it was, yes. Also, the antidote for it's
skin contact hazards seems to be...lotion.

On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 13:20:07 -0800, Larry Jaques
wrote:

On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 15:25:24 GMT, the inscrutable "Steven and Gail
Peterson" spake:

http://www.bu.edu/es/labsafety/ESMSD...l#anchor948065

Whoever said it would kill you if you used it to get glue off your
hands should read this portion from the MSDS:

"Ingestion:
Swallowing small amounts is not likely to produce harmful effects."

'Nuff said?

Not quite: When swallowing, inhilation into the lungs can cause
severe damage. Otherwise it's considered to be relatively mild. But
we need to define "relatively", and "small amount". Here's a blurb:

Inhalation:
Inhalation of vapors irritates the respiratory tract. May cause
coughing, dizziness, dullness, and headache. Higher concentrations can
produce central nervous system depression, narcosis, and
unconsciousness.
Ingestion:
Swallowing small amounts is not likely to produce harmful effects.
Ingestion of larger amounts may produce abdominal pain, nausea and
vomiting. Aspiration into lungs can produce severe lung damage and is
a medical emergency. Other symptoms are expected to parallel
inhalation.
Skin Contact:
Irritating due to defatting action on skin. Causes redness, pain,
drying and cracking of the skin.
Eye Contact:
Vapors are irritating to the eyes. Splashes may cause severe
irritation, with stinging, tearing, redness and pain.
Chronic Exposu
Prolonged or repeated skin contact may produce severe irritation or
dermatitis.
Aggravation of Pre-existing Conditions:
Use of alcoholic beverages enhances toxic effects. Exposure may
increase the toxic potential of chlorinated hydrocarbons, such as
chloroform, trichloroethane.

You have to remember this is the BU*H E.P.A. and all of the dangerous
wording has most likely been taken out to benefit the corporations.......

--

Rumpty

Radial Arm Saw Forum: http://forums.delphiforums.com/woodbutcher/start

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


"Steven and Gail Peterson" wrote in message
ink.net...
http://www.bu.edu/es/labsafety/ESMSD...l#anchor948065

"Guess who" wrote in message
...

Not quite: When swallowing, inhilation into the lungs can cause
severe damage. Otherwise it's considered to be relatively mild. But
we need to define "relatively", and "small amount". Here's a blurb:

Not quite. Look again - aspiration, not inhalation. It's talking about
breathing in the liquid.

--

-Mike-





Inhalation:
Inhalation of vapors irritates the respiratory tract. May cause
coughing, dizziness, dullness, and headache. Higher concentrations can
produce central nervous system depression, narcosis, and
unconsciousness.
Ingestion:
Swallowing small amounts is not likely to produce harmful effects.
Ingestion of larger amounts may produce abdominal pain, nausea and
vomiting. Aspiration into lungs can produce severe lung damage and is
a medical emergency. Other symptoms are expected to parallel
inhalation.
Skin Contact:
Irritating due to defatting action on skin. Causes redness, pain,
drying and cracking of the skin.
Eye Contact:
Vapors are irritating to the eyes. Splashes may cause severe
irritation, with stinging, tearing, redness and pain.
Chronic Exposu
Prolonged or repeated skin contact may produce severe irritation or
dermatitis.
Aggravation of Pre-existing Conditions:
Use of alcoholic beverages enhances toxic effects. Exposure may
increase the toxic potential of chlorinated hydrocarbons, such as
chloroform, trichloroethane.

"Steven and Gail Peterson" wrote in message
ink.net...
http://www.bu.edu/es/labsafety/ESMSD...l#anchor948065



Wow, acetone seems docile compared to this nasty stuff:

http://www.dhmo.org/msdsdhmo.html

"Rumpty" wrote in message
...
You have to remember this is the BU*H E.P.A. and all of the dangerous
wording has most likely been taken out to benefit the corporations.......


Snicker.

The EPA doesn't do MSDSs.

You're really a case....



"Steven and Gail Peterson" wrote in message
ink.net...
http://www.bu.edu/es/labsafety/ESMSD...l#anchor948065

On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 17:53:58 -0500, "Mike Marlow"
wrote:


"Guess who" wrote in message
.. .

Not quite: When swallowing, inhilation into the lungs can cause
severe damage. Otherwise it's considered to be relatively mild. But
we need to define "relatively", and "small amount". Here's a blurb:

Not quite. Look again - aspiration, not inhalation. It's talking about
breathing in the liquid.

I realised that as I was writing it. However, I also realised that it
was fairly synonymous. To "aspirate" is to "breath in". That also
implies inhilation. If you inhale under water, you will aspirate the
water into your lungs. Aspiration can also refer to transfer of a
gas. ...zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 23:38:54 GMT, "Mark Howell"
wrote:


"Steven and Gail Peterson" wrote in message
link.net...
http://www.bu.edu/es/labsafety/ESMSD...l#anchor948065



Wow, acetone seems docile compared to this nasty stuff:

http://www.dhmo.org/msdsdhmo.html


Thanks. We needed that. :-)

Rumpty wrote:

You have to remember this is the BU*H E.P.A. and all of the dangerous
wording has most likely been taken out to benefit the corporations.......

--

Rumpty

Somehow I doubt that the wording of every MSDS on Earth has been changed to
suit the preferences of the President.

And the Canadian government doesn't seem to think it's particularly
dangerous either.

Radial Arm Saw Forum: http://forums.delphiforums.com/woodbutcher/start

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


"Steven and Gail Peterson" wrote in message
ink.net...
http://www.bu.edu/es/labsafety/ESMSD...l#anchor948065



--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)

In article , "Mike Marlow" wrote:

"Guess who" wrote in message
.. .

Not quite: When swallowing, inhilation into the lungs can cause
severe damage. Otherwise it's considered to be relatively mild. But
we need to define "relatively", and "small amount". Here's a blurb:

Not quite. Look again - aspiration, not inhalation. It's talking about
breathing in the liquid.

Yep. Even water is dangerous if you breathe the liquid.

--
Regards,
Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com)

Nobody ever left footprints in the sands of time by sitting on his butt.
And who wants to leave buttprints in the sands of time?

It was somewhere outside Barstow when Larry Jaques
wrote:

"Ingestion:
Swallowing small amounts is not likely to produce harmful effects."

OK, so we get a barrelful and _drown_ him in it.

"Andy Dingley" wrote in message
news
It was somewhere outside Barstow when Larry Jaques
wrote:

"Ingestion:
Swallowing small amounts is not likely to produce harmful effects."

OK, so we get a barrelful and _drown_ him in it.


Now *that* would be aspiration!

--

-Mike-

Guess who wrote:

On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 17:53:58 -0500, "Mike Marlow"
wrote:


"Guess who" wrote in message
.. .

Not quite: When swallowing, inhilation into the lungs can cause
severe damage. Otherwise it's considered to be relatively mild. But
we need to define "relatively", and "small amount". Here's a blurb:

Not quite. Look again - aspiration, not inhalation. It's talking about
breathing in the liquid.

I realised that as I was writing it. However, I also realised that it
was fairly synonymous. To "aspirate" is to "breath in". That also
implies inhilation. If you inhale under water, you will aspirate the
water into your lungs. Aspiration can also refer to transfer of a
gas. ...zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

You are ignoring that the passage uses inhalation and aspiration quite
separately and very specifically. Add that aspiration is under Ingestion
and not under inhalation and it is clear that Mike is correct.

Me, I would wear gloves when using it and if using a lot or for a long
time a respirator (I already wear glasses).

Peter
--
Add my middle initial to email me. It has become attached to a country

On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 23:29:13 -0500, Mike Marlow wrote:

"Andy Dingley" wrote in message
news
It was somewhere outside Barstow when Larry Jaques
wrote:

"Ingestion:
Swallowing small amounts is not likely to produce harmful effects."

OK, so we get a barrelful and _drown_ him in it.

Now *that* would be aspiration!

Well yes, but asphyxiation would be the immediate cause of death...

Andy Dingley wrote in
news
It was somewhere outside Barstow when Larry Jaques
wrote:

"Ingestion:
Swallowing small amounts is not likely to produce harmful effects."

OK, so we get a barrelful and _drown_ him in it.


A decent malmsey I pray.

On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 21:53:06 -0600, "Henry St.Pierre"
scribbled:

Andy Dingley wrote in
news
It was somewhere outside Barstow when Larry Jaques
wrote:

"Ingestion:
Swallowing small amounts is not likely to produce harmful effects."

OK, so we get a barrelful and _drown_ him in it.

A decent malmsey I pray.

Waste of cheap sweet wine. Stick to acetone, a whiff of which I have
more than once experienced in a number of people's prized home-made
vino, not to speak of some commercial offerings. Hmmm. I wonder if
cheap wine could be used to remove gorilla glue stains. And it does
damage the liver . . .

Luigi
Replace "nonet" with "yukonomics" for real email address
www.yukonomics.ca/wooddorking/humour.html
www.yukonomics.ca/wooddorking/antifaq.html

On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 21:53:06 -0600, "Henry St.Pierre"
wrote:

Andy Dingley wrote in
news
It was somewhere outside Barstow when Larry Jaques
wrote:

"Ingestion:
Swallowing small amounts is not likely to produce harmful effects."

OK, so we get a barrelful and _drown_ him in it.


A decent malmsey I pray.


Nay, not for Larry, butt for Clarence.



Thomas J. Watson - WoodDorker

tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet (real email)
http://home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1 (webpage)

On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 21:43:28 -0500, Tom Watson
wrote:

Nay, not for Larry, butt for Clarence.

I'm curious as to just how many people will get that.

--
LRod

Master Woodbutcher and seasoned termite

Shamelessly whoring my website since 1999

http://www.woodbutcher.net

On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 03:39:00 +0000, LRod
wrote:

On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 21:43:28 -0500, Tom Watson
wrote:

Nay, not for Larry, butt for Clarence.

I'm curious as to just how many people will get that.


Caviar to the general?


Thomas J. Watson - WoodDorker

tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet (real email)
http://home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1 (webpage)