Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Tim
 
Posts: n/a
Default Jointer Planing

amateur woodworker here who has found that I'm going to need a planer and
jointer if I'm ever going to have any square projects

my question is can you plane wood sufficiently on one of those 6 1/8" table
top jointers?


  #2   Report Post  
leonard
 
Posts: n/a
Default

yes, if your are careful and use the right technique.

Len
"Tim" wrote in message
...
amateur woodworker here who has found that I'm going to need a planer and
jointer if I'm ever going to have any square projects

my question is can you plane wood sufficiently on one of those 6 1/8"
table top jointers?



  #3   Report Post  
RonB
 
Posts: n/a
Default

6" table top jointers come in various lengths and quality. This is another
case of getting what you pay for. Some of the cheapo's with inadequate
table adjustment mechanisms will lead you to never-ending frustration.
However, there are some good table top or stand mounted machines offered by
Delta, Jet and others.

Actually 6" is a pretty common jointer width for hobby and some pro shops.
I have a heavier 6" Powermatic 54A and love it.


  #4   Report Post  
Silvan
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Tim wrote:

amateur woodworker here who has found that I'm going to need a planer and
jointer if I'm ever going to have any square projects

my question is can you plane wood sufficiently on one of those 6 1/8"
table top jointers?


Sort of, but...

A) these benchtop machines really are pretty seriously crappy, and all but
useless (mine is the cheapo Delta with crappy aluminum tables)

B) jointers are for jointing, not planing. Their job is to get something
flat. What they can't do securely is get two faces of a board parallel to
each other. That's what a planer is for.

I don't have a planer, and neither room nor money for one. I'm not very
good at getting a dead flat perfect surface with hand planes, but so far
the stuff I'm doing only demands that one side of the board be perfect
anyway. So what I'm doing is face jointing one face, then marking off the
other face with a marking gauge, and hand planing that face down to the
line.

This would work better if I had a real jointer. This one leave streaks on
the faces of the boards. I think it's actually the counterweights on the
cutterhead burnishing the wood. All in all, this jointer was a pretty
regretable decision. I might well be better off with no jointer at all,
which would force me to suck it up and waste wood until I finally get the
knack of (hand) jointing an edge square to the face properly.

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/
http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/
  #5   Report Post  
max
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I don't know about that. I went from a 12 inch behemoth to a 6 inch Delta
portable with the aluminum tables and I can make it work just fine. Of
course I can't joint a 10 foot 4x6, but have been doing fine with 4 foot
lengths so far and probably could go further if needed.
max

6" table top jointers come in various lengths and quality. This is another
case of getting what you pay for. Some of the cheapo's with inadequate
table adjustment mechanisms will lead you to never-ending frustration.
However, there are some good table top or stand mounted machines offered by
Delta, Jet and others.

Actually 6" is a pretty common jointer width for hobby and some pro shops.
I have a heavier 6" Powermatic 54A and love it.





  #6   Report Post  
patriarch
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Tim" wrote in
:

amateur woodworker here who has found that I'm going to need a planer
and jointer if I'm ever going to have any square projects

my question is can you plane wood sufficiently on one of those 6 1/8"
table top jointers?


Universal, apply anywhere answer: It depends. On your jointer. On your
technique. On your workpiece. On your stock. On your experience. On
your goals.

Max can do a lot of things, that others of us 'find challenging'. That
comes from a career as a craftsman in wood. Many of the rest of us take
things more slowly, and set our sights accordingly.

Can you get good results from a modest machine? May I refer you back to
the recent thread "A poor workman and his tools..."

Patriarch,
learning to love the older, longer Stanley products...
  #7   Report Post  
Mike Marlow
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Tim" wrote in message
...
amateur woodworker here who has found that I'm going to need a planer and
jointer if I'm ever going to have any square projects

my question is can you plane wood sufficiently on one of those 6 1/8"

table
top jointers?



Geeze Tim, I can't believe anyone hasn't suggested that you might want to
look at what else might be going wrong if you can't get a square project at
this point. Jointers and do their job and there are a lot out there that
will do it well, even for small money, but I'd start looking closer to home
for problems. If you're using finished lumber from the store instead of
rough cut lumber, I sure wouldn't jump into the purchase of a planer.

Square - how about your saw? You should be able to get a cut from your
tablesaw that will all but eliminate the need for a jointer. If not, it's
time to look at the set up of your tablesaw or your technique. You'd be
surprised at how well a well tuned saw will produce an edge ready for glue
up. Planers do a good job of sizing the thickness of wood but is that what
you need? Do you build a lot of things that require wood that is not of a
standard dimension?

I wouldn't be spending more money on jointers and planers if you're having
problems with fundamentals. Chances are you'll still have those problems
even with the new tools. Especially with the jointer. If your cuts with a
table saw are giving you problems, you're probably going to have like
problems with a jointer. It's not a wonder tool, no matter how good the
jointer is. I'd go back to the basics.

Now on the other hand, if your post is an exaggeration, in the time honored
manner of justifying the purchase of new tools...

--

-Mike-



  #8   Report Post  
Mike Marlow
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Doug Miller" wrote in message
news

Buying S4S from a dealer is no guarantee of getting lumber that's

straight,
flat, and square. All you can depend on is that the two faces are

parallel,
and that the board is the same width along its entire length. No guarantee
that the edges are truly square to the faces. No guarantee that either the
edges or the faces are straight.


There's no guarantees of anything in life Doug, but 99% of the time one can
purchase any lumber they need from local suppliers, ether BORG or smaller
suppliers, that is finished ready to go. Faces are parallel, edges are true
and square.

Square - how about your saw? You should be able to get a cut from your
tablesaw that will all but eliminate the need for a jointer.


Ummmm.... no, not at all. If you don't joint one edge of a board straight,

how
on earth are you going to get a straight cut from the table saw?


Lots of ways. Many here do not joint for glue up. You can tack or tape a
guide board to the material to be cut, for example. I have cut thousands of
linear feet of lumber - at least many, many hundreds this way, and glue up
was just fine. It is categorically not an absolute requirement to run a
board through a jointer. The other alternative is to touch it up with a
plane, which admitedly is jointing, but the point remains that a jointer and
a planer are not necessarily must have tools given the brief description of
the problem the OP gave.


And I haven't seen a table saw yet, that's capable of producing a

straight,
flat _face_ on an uneven board.


Come on over.



If not, it's
time to look at the set up of your tablesaw or your technique. You'd be
surprised at how well a well tuned saw will produce an edge ready for

glue
up.


*If* the board is straight, flat, and square to begin with -- which of

course
is the reason that jointers and planers exist.


Bad assumption. Use the saw to make the board straight and square. The
jointer, as a tool, is no better for making square than a table saw is.
They both rely on a fence that is perpendicular to the cutting surface and
they both use adjustable fences. Square requires attention to detail in
setting the fence. For flat - select lumber better. Granted, the planer
will make bad lumber better, but that's not the original point of my reply.


Planers do a good job of sizing the thickness of wood but is that what
you need? Do you build a lot of things that require wood that is not of

a
standard dimension?


The only way to be sure of getting wood that is straight, flat, and square

is
to joint and plane it yourself. Every hardwood dealer I know of will plane
wood to any thickness you want, but I haven't encountered one yet that

will
joint it first.


Our experiences differ then. I've had great success in getting S4S that met
your criteria. Didn't require much more than going to the store and buying
it.



I wouldn't be spending more money on jointers and planers if you're

having
problems with fundamentals. Chances are you'll still have those problems
even with the new tools. Especially with the jointer. If your cuts with

a
table saw are giving you problems, you're probably going to have like
problems with a jointer. It's not a wonder tool, no matter how good the
jointer is. I'd go back to the basics.


IMO that conclusion, while possibly correct, is completely unwarranted by

the
scant facts provided in the OP. He could very well be having trouble with

his
table saw cuts precisely because he _doesn't_ have a jointer. If the wood
isn't flat, it's not possible to get consistently good results on the

table
saw no matter what you do.


That's just a bad assertion Doug. Agreed the facts were scant so our
responses are subject to our interpretation of what the OP meant by what he
said, but what you're suggesting above is a wood problem. In my first
paragraph I put in the assumption that he was using S4S and if that's the
case I still contend that 99% of the time he does not need a jointer and a
planer to make this wood ready for use. Rough cut is a different story, but
I did not address that. In fact with rough cut, he can have it planed by
the supplier and easily cut it true with his table saw. I have a jointer
and I seldom use it for this application. In fact - I seldom use it. If I
had to get rid of one of my power tools it could easily be my jointer that
would be the first to go with little impact on my ability to produce quality
work.

--

-Mike-



  #9   Report Post  
RonB
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"max" wrote in message
...
I don't know about that. I went from a 12 inch behemoth to a 6 inch Delta
portable with the aluminum tables and I can make it work just fine. Of
course I can't joint a 10 foot 4x6, but have been doing fine with 4 foot
lengths so far and probably could go further if needed.
max



Yeah - That is what I like about the Powermatic 54. The 60+ inch table lets
me work with longer stock pretty easily. Kinda crowds my garage shop, but
worth it.


  #10   Report Post  
RonB
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Can you get good results from a modest machine? May I refer you back to
the recent thread "A poor workman and his tools..."


I missed that thread. There are some good thoughts there (not to mention
some of the usual, but benevolent BS). One of the themes probably applies
here. A good workman probably researches and then selects the best tools
that he can afford, even if he has to wait a while on the 'afford' part.

The predecessor to my Powermatic 54A was a mid-50's vintage Craftsman 4"
tabletop, mounted on a wooden stand. It might not be considered desirable
by today's standards but the old machine was built like a fireplug and could
cut a pretty good edge. I could even surface one side of 6" or 7" wide
material, good enough for the surface planer - if I held my tongue right and
was careful. Joining longer stock over 5 or 6' was possible but I might put
more wood on the floor before I was pleased. Overall It did the job if I
did my job with diligence.

Now that I have had the Powermatic for a few months would I take the
Craftsman back?

Well, Hell NO!




  #11   Report Post  
Bill Wallace
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yes! If this is waht you can afford it is much better than not having
it at all. It will take a bit longer, you'll have to work a bit slower
but it will work as well as anything else if you take the time.

Also:

1. Jointing edges: You start to be less efficent as the board lenght
to table length ratio increases. A 6" table top jointer can easily
joint a 24" board edge perfectly. Not so easy for a 6' edge.

2. Planing: This ratio is less important for planing but you can
really only plane one side on the jointer. Then you need a planer to
get parallel faces.

Starting with a 4 sided rough board; on the joiner joint one edge,
plane one face; on the planer plane the other face; on the table saw
parallel the other edge.

BW


"Tim" wrote in message ...
amateur woodworker here who has found that I'm going to need a planer and
jointer if I'm ever going to have any square projects

my question is can you plane wood sufficiently on one of those 6 1/8" table
top jointers?

  #12   Report Post  
Doug Miller
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , "Mike Marlow" wrote:

"Doug Miller" wrote in message
news

Buying S4S from a dealer is no guarantee of getting lumber that's

straight,
flat, and square. All you can depend on is that the two faces are

parallel,
and that the board is the same width along its entire length. No guarantee
that the edges are truly square to the faces. No guarantee that either the
edges or the faces are straight.


There's no guarantees of anything in life Doug, but 99% of the time one can
purchase any lumber they need from local suppliers, ether BORG or smaller
suppliers, that is finished ready to go. Faces are parallel, edges are true
and square.


If you think the S4S lumber from the Borg is flat, then your definition of
flat is a little more generous than mine.

Square - how about your saw? You should be able to get a cut from your
tablesaw that will all but eliminate the need for a jointer.


Ummmm.... no, not at all. If you don't joint one edge of a board straight,

how
on earth are you going to get a straight cut from the table saw?


Lots of ways. Many here do not joint for glue up. You can tack or tape a
guide board to the material to be cut, for example.


And how do you get a straight edge on that guide board?

I have cut thousands of
linear feet of lumber - at least many, many hundreds this way, and glue up
was just fine. It is categorically not an absolute requirement to run a
board through a jointer. The other alternative is to touch it up with a
plane, which admitedly is jointing, but the point remains that a jointer and
a planer are not necessarily must have tools given the brief description of
the problem the OP gave.


And what about the faces? You simply can't make a twisted or bowed board flat
without jointing it in _some_ fashion. It doesn't matter whether you use a
jointer, or a jointer plane, or a sled in a planer, or whatever -- you still
have to joint the wood _somehow_ if you want to be sure that it's straight and
flat.


And I haven't seen a table saw yet, that's capable of producing a

straight,
flat _face_ on an uneven board.


Come on over.


ROTFLMAO.



If not, it's
time to look at the set up of your tablesaw or your technique. You'd be
surprised at how well a well tuned saw will produce an edge ready for

glue
up.


*If* the board is straight, flat, and square to begin with -- which of

course
is the reason that jointers and planers exist.


Bad assumption. Use the saw to make the board straight and square.


Please describe how you would make a bowed board flat, using a table saw.

The
jointer, as a tool, is no better for making square than a table saw is.


I didn't claim that it was, but rather that a jointer *will* make straight
*and* flat, a board that isn't. A table saw will not.

They both rely on a fence that is perpendicular to the cutting surface and
they both use adjustable fences. Square requires attention to detail in
setting the fence.


True, but not really relevant.

For flat - select lumber better.


No, for flat, buy it rough and surface it yourself. The stuff you buy from the
Borg isn't flat.

Granted, the planer
will make bad lumber better, but that's not the original point of my reply.


Planers do a good job of sizing the thickness of wood but is that what
you need? Do you build a lot of things that require wood that is not of

a
standard dimension?


The only way to be sure of getting wood that is straight, flat, and square

is
to joint and plane it yourself. Every hardwood dealer I know of will plane
wood to any thickness you want, but I haven't encountered one yet that

will
joint it first.


Our experiences differ then. I've had great success in getting S4S that met
your criteria. Didn't require much more than going to the store and buying
it.


No, you've had great success in getting S4S that meets *your* criteria. And if
the wood you're buying is good enough for your purposes, more power to you.




I wouldn't be spending more money on jointers and planers if you're

having
problems with fundamentals. Chances are you'll still have those problems
even with the new tools. Especially with the jointer. If your cuts with

a
table saw are giving you problems, you're probably going to have like
problems with a jointer. It's not a wonder tool, no matter how good the
jointer is. I'd go back to the basics.


IMO that conclusion, while possibly correct, is completely unwarranted by

the
scant facts provided in the OP. He could very well be having trouble with

his
table saw cuts precisely because he _doesn't_ have a jointer. If the wood
isn't flat, it's not possible to get consistently good results on the

table
saw no matter what you do.


That's just a bad assertion Doug. Agreed the facts were scant so our
responses are subject to our interpretation of what the OP meant by what he
said, but what you're suggesting above is a wood problem. In my first
paragraph I put in the assumption that he was using S4S and if that's the
case I still contend that 99% of the time he does not need a jointer and a
planer to make this wood ready for use.


Depends on your definition of "ready for use" I guess. The lumber at the Borg
apparently meets your definition. It doesn't meet mine; that's why I buy my
lumber rough, and surface it myself.

Rough cut is a different story, but
I did not address that. In fact with rough cut, he can have it planed by
the supplier and easily cut it true with his table saw.


Yes, he can -- but if it isn't flat before being planed, it isn't going to be
flat after planing either. That's what a jointer is for.

I have a jointer
and I seldom use it for this application. In fact - I seldom use it. If I
had to get rid of one of my power tools it could easily be my jointer that
would be the first to go with little impact on my ability to produce quality
work.


That's amazing.

--
Regards,
Doug Miller (alphageek-at-milmac-dot-com)

Get a copy of my NEW AND IMPROVED TrollFilter for NewsProxy/Nfilter
by sending email to autoresponder at filterinfo-at-milmac-dot-com
You must use your REAL email address to get a response.


  #13   Report Post  
Mike Marlow
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Doug Miller" wrote in message
. com...
In article , "Mike

Marlow" wrote:


If you think the S4S lumber from the Borg is flat, then your definition of
flat is a little more generous than mine.


I don't know what you look for then Doug. I have certainly found plenty of
flat - by anyone's definition at places including BORGs. Maybe you are
pushing the point to rediculous levels?


Lots of ways. Many here do not joint for glue up. You can tack or tape

a
guide board to the material to be cut, for example.


And how do you get a straight edge on that guide board?


Come on Doug. You can't find a straight piece of wood? Without a jointer?
If not, then your standards far exceed the tolerances applicable to
woodworking and are therefore excessive, or you're being difficult.


I have cut thousands of
linear feet of lumber - at least many, many hundreds this way, and glue

up
was just fine. It is categorically not an absolute requirement to run a
board through a jointer. The other alternative is to touch it up with a
plane, which admitedly is jointing, but the point remains that a jointer

and
a planer are not necessarily must have tools given the brief description

of
the problem the OP gave.


And what about the faces? You simply can't make a twisted or bowed board

flat
without jointing it in _some_ fashion. It doesn't matter whether you use a
jointer, or a jointer plane, or a sled in a planer, or whatever -- you

still
have to joint the wood _somehow_ if you want to be sure that it's straight

and
flat.


You didn't read what I have posted throughout this discussion. You're
focused on picking on minutia and ignoring the point of the conversation.
We're not talking about - nor have been talking about taking a twist out of
twisted boards. You're throwing that in again as a red herring.



And I haven't seen a table saw yet, that's capable of producing a

straight,
flat _face_ on an uneven board.


Come on over.


ROTFLMAO.


Maybe you need a new saw.


Please describe how you would make a bowed board flat, using a table saw.


There you go again. Do you really feel the OP was frustrated because he was
using bowed and twisted wood and at wit's end because he couldn't turn out a
square project?


The
jointer, as a tool, is no better for making square than a table saw is.


I didn't claim that it was, but rather that a jointer *will* make straight
*and* flat, a board that isn't. A table saw will not.


Never said it would - you are the one that threw that into the discussion
even though it's totally irrelevant to the point under discussion.


They both rely on a fence that is perpendicular to the cutting surface

and
they both use adjustable fences. Square requires attention to detail in
setting the fence.


True, but not really relevant.


Amazing.


For flat - select lumber better.


No, for flat, buy it rough and surface it yourself. The stuff you buy from

the
Borg isn't flat.


Just what micro measure of deviation are you seeing Doug? You either look
for the worst pieces so that you can comment on them or you don't have the
same quality of lumber in your area that I do.



Our experiences differ then. I've had great success in getting S4S that

met
your criteria. Didn't require much more than going to the store and

buying
it.


No, you've had great success in getting S4S that meets *your* criteria.

And if
the wood you're buying is good enough for your purposes, more power to

you.


Fine. If your criteria is so strict that thousands of an inch are all that
critical to you, then more power to you. Has it occurred to you that
perhaps the OP might not be quite that picky and that he doesn't need the
feeling that it's somehow now flatter, just because he ran it through his
own planer?

Honestly Doug, if you're seriously contending that one cannot purchase flat
lumber at the BORG or anywhere else, as I had originally contended, then by
all means, plane your little heart out, but don't bother to suggest that the
standards of others is somehow less than yours because of this.




I wouldn't be spending more money on jointers and planers if you're

having
problems with fundamentals. Chances are you'll still have those

problems
even with the new tools. Especially with the jointer. If your cuts

with
a
table saw are giving you problems, you're probably going to have like
problems with a jointer. It's not a wonder tool, no matter how good

the
jointer is. I'd go back to the basics.

IMO that conclusion, while possibly correct, is completely unwarranted

by
the
scant facts provided in the OP. He could very well be having trouble

with
his
table saw cuts precisely because he _doesn't_ have a jointer. If the

wood
isn't flat, it's not possible to get consistently good results on the

table
saw no matter what you do.


That's just a bad assertion Doug. Agreed the facts were scant so our
responses are subject to our interpretation of what the OP meant by what

he
said, but what you're suggesting above is a wood problem. In my first
paragraph I put in the assumption that he was using S4S and if that's the
case I still contend that 99% of the time he does not need a jointer and

a
planer to make this wood ready for use.


Depends on your definition of "ready for use" I guess. The lumber at the

Borg
apparently meets your definition. It doesn't meet mine; that's why I buy

my
lumber rough, and surface it myself.


Good for you. A world of people around you turn out craftsman quality
pieces with this stuff though so I'll chose to not credit your point.


Rough cut is a different story, but
I did not address that. In fact with rough cut, he can have it planed by
the supplier and easily cut it true with his table saw.


Yes, he can -- but if it isn't flat before being planed, it isn't going to

be
flat after planing either. That's what a jointer is for.


You keep coming back to this point and I just don't understand your
insistance on it. I'm making the assumption the OP is not trying to build
something with twisted, bowed stock and you're making the assumption he is.
Impass.


I have a jointer
and I seldom use it for this application. In fact - I seldom use it. If

I
had to get rid of one of my power tools it could easily be my jointer

that
would be the first to go with little impact on my ability to produce

quality
work.


That's amazing.


Nah - that's life.

--

-Mike-



  #15   Report Post  
Charlie Self
 
Posts: n/a
Default

slindars asks:

For my own clarification, why is the last edge always done on the
table saw? I remember in shop class we would do a similiar sequence,
using only a jointer and a table saw. I think it was jointer, table
saw, jointer, tablesaw. I could be wrong, but just want the logic
behind the method


The logic behind the method is simple parallelism. I don't know why you recall
the second jointer use, but for the most part, machine prep of rough wood
starts with flattening one face on the jointer, then swinging into jointing one
edge. That gives, one expects, a smooth face that is square to one edge. You
then plane the other face, which smooths that while it also makes it parallel
to the first face. Finally, you pass the jointed edge along the fence of the
table saw, ripping off waste from the other edge and creating another parallel,
resulting in a S4S board with edges square to the faces, if all goes well.

It can be done other ways, but this is the most positive, the one most likely
to result in consist and desirable results.

Charlie Self
"Ambition is a poor excuse for not having sense enough to be lazy."
Edgar Bergen, (Charlie McCarthy)


  #16   Report Post  
Doug Miller
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , (slindars) wrote:
For my own clarification, why is the last edge always done on the
table saw? I remember in shop class we would do a similiar sequence,
using only a jointer and a table saw.


No thickness planer in there anywhere?

I think it was jointer, table saw, jointer, tablesaw.


Don't see how that's gonna work...

I could be wrong, but just want the logic
behind the method


Steps a
A. joint one face flat.
B. joint one edge straight, and square to that face.
C. plane the unjointed face parallel to the jointed face.
D. rip unjointed edge parallel to the jointed edge.

They don't have to be done in exactly this order, but A must come first, and B
must come before D. So if it's easier for you to do them A-C-B-D, or A-B-D-C,
that's fine.

Actually, my work flow looks more like A-B, A-B, A-B, A-B... until I've
jointed every board, then C,C,C,C... until they're all planed, etc. Just
easier for me to not have to move the wood from one machine to another any
more than is necessary. A bonus is that everything has been surfaced to a
consistent thickness before it hits the table saw; that way, I can use the
offcuts as stickers when I'm stacking lumber. :-)

The reason for doing it this way is that, while jointers make things straight
and flat, they can't make two opposite surfaces parallel. You can joint one
face of a board straight and flat, but if you want the opposite side to be
straight, flat, *and* parallel to the first side, you can't guarantee that on
a jointer. That's what a planer is for.

Similarly, you can joint one edge straight and square to one of the faces. You
can even joint the opposite edge straight and square to the same face. But
there's no guarantee that it will be parallel to the first edge. That's what
the table saw is for.

--
Regards,
Doug Miller (alphageek-at-milmac-dot-com)

Get a copy of my NEW AND IMPROVED TrollFilter for NewsProxy/Nfilter
by sending email to autoresponder at filterinfo-at-milmac-dot-com
You must use your REAL email address to get a response.


  #17   Report Post  
Prometheus
 
Posts: n/a
Default


There's no guarantees of anything in life Doug, but 99% of the time one can
purchase any lumber they need from local suppliers, ether BORG or smaller
suppliers, that is finished ready to go. Faces are parallel, edges are true
and square.


If you think the S4S lumber from the Borg is flat, then your definition of
flat is a little more generous than mine.


You have to look at the wood before you buy it- you can't just grab it
and run, but there's always at least a few that are flat as can be.
At the supplier I get my wood from, it is always flat- they have own a
millwork shop in another city, and both joint and plane it after
kiln-drying it and before putting it in the rack because they care
about the wood.

Lots of ways. Many here do not joint for glue up. You can tack or tape a
guide board to the material to be cut, for example.


And how do you get a straight edge on that guide board?


With your saw. I kind of get the feeling you're not getting
everything you could be out of your tablesaw.

And I haven't seen a table saw yet, that's capable of producing a

straight,
flat _face_ on an uneven board.


Come on over.


ROTFLMAO.


Mine can do it, and it's a just a benchtop. You can't do it with a 6"
wide piece of stock, but it'll work on plenty of narrower boards.

Bad assumption. Use the saw to make the board straight and square.


Please describe how you would make a bowed board flat, using a table saw.


Attach it to a flat board with some double-sided tape and run the
guide board along the fence, removing a little at a time until you've
got a straight face.

For flat - select lumber better.


No, for flat, buy it rough and surface it yourself. The stuff you buy from the
Borg isn't flat.


It sure can be.

The only way to be sure of getting wood that is straight, flat, and square

is
to joint and plane it yourself. Every hardwood dealer I know of will plane
wood to any thickness you want, but I haven't encountered one yet that

will
joint it first.


The one I buy from joints the wood first. Perhaps you need a better
supplier?

That's just a bad assertion Doug. Agreed the facts were scant so our
responses are subject to our interpretation of what the OP meant by what he
said, but what you're suggesting above is a wood problem. In my first
paragraph I put in the assumption that he was using S4S and if that's the
case I still contend that 99% of the time he does not need a jointer and a
planer to make this wood ready for use.


Depends on your definition of "ready for use" I guess. The lumber at the Borg
apparently meets your definition. It doesn't meet mine; that's why I buy my
lumber rough, and surface it myself.


It's certainly cheaper that way, and a great way to buy wood. I just
don't see why you're arguing that you can't buy decently prepared S4S
anywhere. It's expensive, and you have to look at it before you buy
it, but there's straight, square S4S in any place that sells wood-
even Menards, and they're the worst supplier of wood I've ever
encountered anywhere.

I have a jointer
and I seldom use it for this application. In fact - I seldom use it. If I
had to get rid of one of my power tools it could easily be my jointer that
would be the first to go with little impact on my ability to produce quality
work.


That's amazing.


Why is that amazing? I don't have a jointer at all, and don't plan on
getting one. If a board needs straightening, I use a hand plane- but
I usually just try to buy decently prepared S3S stock in the first
place. The extra cost is well worth the space that a jointer is not
taking up in my shop to me!


Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
  #18   Report Post  
mac davis
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 00:24:58 -0500, Silvan
wrote:

snip
B) jointers are for jointing, not planing. Their job is to get something
flat. What they can't do securely is get two faces of a board parallel to
each other. That's what a planer is for.

snip

thanks, you answered my question...

seems to me that planers are for face and jointers are for edge, but
not having either yet, I'm only going by knowledge got here..

sort of like asking if you can play ping pong with a golf ball.. same
shape and about the same size, but designed for different tasks..
  #19   Report Post  
mac davis
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 08:40:21 -0600, "RonB" wrote:


Can you get good results from a modest machine? May I refer you back to
the recent thread "A poor workman and his tools..."


I missed that thread. There are some good thoughts there (not to mention
some of the usual, but benevolent BS). One of the themes probably applies
here. A good workman probably researches and then selects the best tools
that he can afford, even if he has to wait a while on the 'afford' part.

The predecessor to my Powermatic 54A was a mid-50's vintage Craftsman 4"
tabletop, mounted on a wooden stand. It might not be considered desirable
by today's standards but the old machine was built like a fireplug and could
cut a pretty good edge. I could even surface one side of 6" or 7" wide
material, good enough for the surface planer - if I held my tongue right and
was careful. Joining longer stock over 5 or 6' was possible but I might put
more wood on the floor before I was pleased. Overall It did the job if I
did my job with diligence.

Now that I have had the Powermatic for a few months would I take the
Craftsman back?

Well, Hell NO!

but, as I think that thread covered, with your skill and experience,
you have a much better chance of producing quality work with the
Craftsman than someone like me would have with your powermatic...


  #21   Report Post  
Silvan
 
Posts: n/a
Default

mac davis wrote:

length. No guarantee that the edges are truly square to the faces. No
guarantee that either the edges or the faces are straight.

snip or the friggin ends!!
I buy S4S or better due to lack of tools... and it's really rare that
either end is cut square in either direction..


I saw a real gem today. Walnut. Put one end flat on the floor, and it made
a great big (. Quality.

--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/
http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/
  #22   Report Post  
Mike Marlow
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Silvan" wrote in message
...
mac davis wrote:

length. No guarantee that the edges are truly square to the faces. No
guarantee that either the edges or the faces are straight.

snip or the friggin ends!!
I buy S4S or better due to lack of tools... and it's really rare that
either end is cut square in either direction..


I saw a real gem today. Walnut. Put one end flat on the floor, and it

made
a great big (. Quality.


Yup - that's why you have to look at the wood. Bad wood comes in all sizes,
and species.
--

-Mike-



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gloat - 8" jointer up and running A Womack Woodworking 14 July 4th 04 05:15 PM
A jointer saga part III: the end jo4hn Woodworking 30 April 22nd 04 04:21 PM
A Few Notes on My New Grizzly G1018HW 8" jointer Darrell Woodworking 5 March 5th 04 12:19 AM
Which 6" jointer? NoNameAtAll Woodworking 30 January 29th 04 04:00 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 DIYbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about DIY & home improvement"