On 15 Jun 2017, "Tales From Kenya" posted some
:

In article
"Byker" wrote:

wrote in message
...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sq8pYfURSnI

"Mahogany is murder"

Really? So is eating any plant then.

Eating anything is murder, so just go drop dead, murderer!

Looks like the book died from lack of interest:

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/...gany-is-murder

https://www.amazon.com/Mahogany-Murd...-Reserves/dp/1
857501608

Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #14,118,069 in Books (See Top 100 in
Books)
#10615 in Books Politics & Social Sciences Social Sciences
Specific Demographics Minority Studies

So it has nothing to do with climate. It's another whitey is
racist book.

How do you know? Did you read it?

Alternately, the climate change ****wits fail to grasp the concept that
the climate changes constantly regardless of contributing influences.

The promotion of "man made" climate change is about indoctrination and
control, nothing else. It's a rabid cult based on fake science.

On Sat, 17 Jun 2017 02:57:10 +0000 (UTC)
Wes Stevens wrote:

control, nothing else. It's a rabid cult based on fake science.

not fake science
bad science yes

some call it consensus science which is a contradiction in terms but
that makes it a suitable moniker

had never heard about mahogany is murder but it is like most other
resource depletions all over

In article , says...

First post to this newsgroup crossposted to conflicting political advocacy
groups. Trolling obvious. plonk

On Saturday, 17 June 2017 04:07:41 UTC+1, Electric Comet wrote:
On Sat, 17 Jun 2017 02:57:10 +0000 (UTC)
Wes Stevens wrote:

control, nothing else. It's a rabid cult based on fake science.

not fake science
bad science yes


Fake science and bad science are different things.

All of you are right, there is a difference between "fake science" and "bad science" and it has to do with both agenda and levels of competence. Actually, what we are looking at is the result of two forces meeting.
1) multiple generations of "those who can, do; and those who cannot teach."
2) #1 is augmented by the fact that those same generations are producing students that are educated beyond their intellect.

The net result is a culture in which data is irrelevant and must be subjugated to the agenda.

The "good news", such a culture cannot long endure.

The bad news is, we live in that doomed culture.

"Dr. Deb" wrote in
:


The "good news", such a culture cannot long endure.

The bad news is, we live in that doomed culture.


The hopeful news is, many cultures have risen and fallen and humans usually
do quite well.

Puckdropper
--
http://www.puckdroppersplace.us/rec.woodworking
A mini archive of some of rec.woodworking's best and worst!

On 18 Jun 2017 13:46:32 GMT, Puckdropper
puckdropper(at)yahoo(dot)com wrote:

"Dr. Deb" wrote in
:


The "good news", such a culture cannot long endure.

The bad news is, we live in that doomed culture.


The hopeful news is, many cultures have risen and fallen and humans usually
do quite well.

The Dark Ages wasn't a fun time for the middle class, though.

On 6/18/2017 7:19 AM, Dr. Deb wrote:

All of you are right, there is a difference between "fake science" and "bad science" and it has to do with both agenda and levels of competence. Actually, what we are looking at is the result of two forces meeting.
1) multiple generations of "those who can, do; and those who cannot teach."
2) #1 is augmented by the fact that those same generations are producing students that are educated beyond their intellect.

The net result is a culture in which data is irrelevant and must be subjugated to the agenda.

The "good news", such a culture cannot long endure.

The bad news is, we live in that doomed culture.

Well said, all I can add is, Exactly!

--
Jack
Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.
http://jbstein.com