Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#42
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/5/2015 7:13 AM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
On Wednesday, February 4, 2015 at 11:42:21 PM UTC-5, Leon wrote: On 2/4/2015 9:03 PM, wrote: On Wed, 04 Feb 2015 19:20:45 -0600, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote: On 2/4/2015 7:04 PM, Leon wrote: of that. I've been thinking of trying TopKote (or whatever it's called these days) and even bought a can but it doesn't say anything about preventing rust. Did they change the formula? I really don't like Boeshield but I like rust a lot less. Way back when, when Topcote was originally made by Empire, I bought it to only slick up my TS Top, that is what it was made for. It was great for that but after about 6 months I noticed that I was no longer having an issue with rust. You need to put on a lot the first time, a few coats and the more you use it the better it protects. It is not guaranteed to prevent rust but as a bonus it works better for me than any thing else I have tried. This place is the leas expensive that I have found for TopCote/GlideCote. http://www.cabinethardware.com/Searc...Search=topcote Wow! Free shipping, too. I've seen prices like that but they don't tell you that they charge $15-$20 shipping and handling. Fortunately they are a local place for me that I have been doing business with for 20+ years. I would suspect their web site not determining a correct shipping price.... Seems if there were free shipping there would not be an input location for destination. This store is top notch with very helpful people and they typically beat the pants off of the competition prices. Either way the average price, elsewhere, for a can is around $18-19. I can second Leon's opinion of cabinethardware.com's customer service. Based on Leon's recommendation, I purchased some drawer slides from them. The website listed the slides as Full Extension, Soft Close. I ordered four 22" slides and one 12" slide. I found that the 12" slide was not full extension. When I called, the CSR did some research and found that the 12" in that line was indeed *not* Full Extension, nor were 14" of the same model. However, the same manufacturer had another (more expensive) line of slides and the 14" in that line was Full Extension. He offered to send me a 14" Full Extension slide, no charge of course, which I accepted. I checked the website a few hours later and it had already been updated to show that the particular 12" and 14" slides in the line that I originally bought were 3/4 Extension. It will take a few adjustments to fit the 14" slide in where I was going to put the 12", but it will fit. Overall, I was extremely satisfied with my dealings with cabinethardware.com's customer service department. Most all of the people that you deal directly with have been there for years and it is an old family owned business. I really like dealing with Barbara. |
#43
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Leon wrote:
Can you expand on that a bit, the finish of the material? I have no sheen so to speak. Buy yes rust only matters if you let it get out of hand. Sure - most surfaces like a table saw top have some degree of a polished surface. It may be flat or it may have milling but it's often (or maybe usually...) polished to some degree. Softer materials can "scratch" that polished finish - scratch the burnished surface, I guess. Polish to a mirror finish and watch how something as soft as a rag can put those tiny scratches in that mirror finish. -- -Mike- |
#44
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 04 Feb 2015 20:11:40 -0600
-MIKE- wrote: Which angles? Miter or bevel? I've cut both using mine and they are extremely accurate and repeatable. Either, don't the cuts fill up with dust and don't they weaken the sled? |
#45
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 04 Feb 2015 20:11:40 -0600
-MIKE- wrote: I have a sacrificial bottom on mine that repositions to close the gap created by the saw kerf of different blades. This creates a zero-clearance insert affect that eliminates tear-out yielding a very clean cut. This answers my other post. I might try one when I find time |
#46
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/5/2015 9:59 AM, Mike Marlow wrote:
Leon wrote: Can you expand on that a bit, the finish of the material? I have no sheen so to speak. Buy yes rust only matters if you let it get out of hand. Sure - most surfaces like a table saw top have some degree of a polished surface. It may be flat or it may have milling but it's often (or maybe usually...) polished to some degree. Softer materials can "scratch" that polished finish - scratch the burnished surface, I guess. Polish to a mirror finish and watch how something as soft as a rag can put those tiny scratches in that mirror finish. Until I got to considering and buying a better TS than my old iron top Craftsman I was not aware that manufacturers provided slick polished top surfaces. I recall looking a the old PM64~66 table saws and still recall the almost mirror finish on the tops. I finally bought a Jet cabinet saw and it had a polished top but not to the degree of the Powermatics. Boy was I disappointed with the "effects" of having a ridgless and polished top. While smooth would seem to be a show of higher quality machining, it does not translate well as far as providing a surface with less friction. With TopCote on my old Craftsman you could toss a small piece of oak to the TS top from 2 feet away and the piece would slide off the back side of the table. With these polished top saws I have not seen anything come close to the slipperiness as the old Craftsman top. I think a polished top is more of a sales gimmick. If you look at the better European machines most do not have a polished top. Click on the close up of the blade and notice the table surface behind the blade. http://www.minimax-usa.com/index.php...mart&Itemid=35 Click the close up of the jointer bed surface http://www.minimax-usa.com/index.php...mart&Itemid=35 Click on the close up of the second and third pictures http://www.lagunatools.com/combo/combo-nx31# |
#47
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/5/2015 11:03 AM, Electric Comet wrote:
On Wed, 04 Feb 2015 20:11:40 -0600 -MIKE- wrote: Which angles? Miter or bevel? I've cut both using mine and they are extremely accurate and repeatable. Either, don't the cuts fill up with dust and don't they weaken the sled? Square or angle cuts are still using the same path, you simply place the work in the sled at an angle. Some sleds have fences that work similar to one found on a miter gauge. These sleds typically do not work on both sides of the blade. This is an excellent sled. I have had both the left and right side sleds for 15 years. http://in-lineindustries.com/product...riginal-dubby/ |
#48
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/5/15 11:22 AM, Leon wrote:
On 2/5/2015 9:59 AM, Mike Marlow wrote: Leon wrote: Can you expand on that a bit, the finish of the material? I have no sheen so to speak. Buy yes rust only matters if you let it get out of hand. Sure - most surfaces like a table saw top have some degree of a polished surface. It may be flat or it may have milling but it's often (or maybe usually...) polished to some degree. Softer materials can "scratch" that polished finish - scratch the burnished surface, I guess. Polish to a mirror finish and watch how something as soft as a rag can put those tiny scratches in that mirror finish. Until I got to considering and buying a better TS than my old iron top Craftsman I was not aware that manufacturers provided slick polished top surfaces. I recall looking a the old PM64~66 table saws and still recall the almost mirror finish on the tops. I finally bought a Jet cabinet saw and it had a polished top but not to the degree of the Powermatics. Boy was I disappointed with the "effects" of having a ridgless and polished top. While smooth would seem to be a show of higher quality machining, it does not translate well as far as providing a surface with less friction. With TopCote on my old Craftsman you could toss a small piece of oak to the TS top from 2 feet away and the piece would slide off the back side of the table. With these polished top saws I have not seen anything come close to the slipperiness as the old Craftsman top. I think a polished top is more of a sales gimmick. If you look at the better European machines most do not have a polished top. I don't know the science behind it but it's like when you go to pick up one plate from a pile of stacked plates and even though you only grab one plate, the one beneath it comes up with it. There's some sort of suction that happens when two very smooth and very flat surfaces are close together. When I have a section of smooth plywood sitting on my melamine out-feed table, it's difficult to lift it straight up and off until that suction "breaks." -- -MIKE- "Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life" --Elvin Jones (1927-2004) -- http://mikedrums.com ---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply |
#49
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/5/15 11:03 AM, Electric Comet wrote:
On Wed, 04 Feb 2015 20:11:40 -0600 -MIKE- wrote: Which angles? Miter or bevel? I've cut both using mine and they are extremely accurate and repeatable. Either, don't the cuts fill up with dust and don't they weaken the sled? (I saw your reply to the other post.) Also keep in mind that there is a front and back solid piece of wood bridging the two sides of the sled. The saw blade doesn't cut through these solid pieces, no matter the angle or height of the blade. Something to keep in mind when making yours-- design and build it so those pieces are quite a bit higher than the blade at it's highest setting. That's for a double sides sled. There are single sides designs out there, which have much shorter fences because they aren't bridging the saw blade. -- -MIKE- "Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life" --Elvin Jones (1927-2004) -- http://mikedrums.com ---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply |
#50
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 12:22:40 PM UTC-5, Leon wrote:
....Major Snippage Occurred... With TopCote on my old Craftsman you could toss a small piece of oak to the TS top from 2 feet away and the piece would slide off the back side of the table. With these polished top saws I have not seen anything come close to the slipperiness as the old Craftsman top. Alleluia! Now I can finally stop trying to shine up my old Craftsman TS top. It's dull, grey, milled surface is working just fine. I just always thought it was supposed to *look* better. Thanks! |
#51
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Leon wrote:
Until I got to considering and buying a better TS than my old iron top Craftsman I was not aware that manufacturers provided slick polished top surfaces. I recall looking a the old PM64~66 table saws and still recall the almost mirror finish on the tops. I finally bought a Jet cabinet saw and it had a polished top but not to the degree of the Powermatics. Boy was I disappointed with the "effects" of having a ridgless and polished top. While smooth would seem to be a show of higher quality machining, it does not translate well as far as providing a surface with less friction. With TopCote on my old Craftsman you could toss a small piece of oak to the TS top from 2 feet away and the piece would slide off the back side of the table. With these polished top saws I have not seen anything come close to the slipperiness as the old Craftsman top. I think a polished top is more of a sales gimmick. You're right - dead flat and polished does not create a more slipery surface. A milled surface with grooves is much better - as long as it's milled flat at the high point of those grooves, or ridges. -- -Mike- |
#52
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/5/2015 10:45 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
When I have a section of smooth plywood sitting on my melamine out-feed table, it's difficult to lift it straight up and off until that suction "breaks." Well, damn! That sucks. |
#53
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/5/2015 11:45 AM, -MIKE- wrote:
On 2/5/15 11:22 AM, Leon wrote: On 2/5/2015 9:59 AM, Mike Marlow wrote: Leon wrote: Can you expand on that a bit, the finish of the material? I have no sheen so to speak. Buy yes rust only matters if you let it get out of hand. Sure - most surfaces like a table saw top have some degree of a polished surface. It may be flat or it may have milling but it's often (or maybe usually...) polished to some degree. Softer materials can "scratch" that polished finish - scratch the burnished surface, I guess. Polish to a mirror finish and watch how something as soft as a rag can put those tiny scratches in that mirror finish. Until I got to considering and buying a better TS than my old iron top Craftsman I was not aware that manufacturers provided slick polished top surfaces. I recall looking a the old PM64~66 table saws and still recall the almost mirror finish on the tops. I finally bought a Jet cabinet saw and it had a polished top but not to the degree of the Powermatics. Boy was I disappointed with the "effects" of having a ridgless and polished top. While smooth would seem to be a show of higher quality machining, it does not translate well as far as providing a surface with less friction. With TopCote on my old Craftsman you could toss a small piece of oak to the TS top from 2 feet away and the piece would slide off the back side of the table. With these polished top saws I have not seen anything come close to the slipperiness as the old Craftsman top. I think a polished top is more of a sales gimmick. If you look at the better European machines most do not have a polished top. I don't know the science behind it but it's like when you go to pick up one plate from a pile of stacked plates and even though you only grab one plate, the one beneath it comes up with it. There's some sort of suction that happens when two very smooth and very flat surfaces are close together. When I have a section of smooth plywood sitting on my melamine out-feed table, it's difficult to lift it straight up and off until that suction "breaks." Yeah, there are thousands of tiny high points that help prevent a vacuum and less contact surface, so less friction. |
#54
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/5/2015 11:53 AM, DerbyDad03 wrote:
On Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 12:22:40 PM UTC-5, Leon wrote: ...Major Snippage Occurred... With TopCote on my old Craftsman you could toss a small piece of oak to the TS top from 2 feet away and the piece would slide off the back side of the table. With these polished top saws I have not seen anything come close to the slipperiness as the old Craftsman top. Alleluia! Now I can finally stop trying to shine up my old Craftsman TS top. It's dull, grey, milled surface is working just fine. I just always thought it was supposed to *look* better. Thanks! No kidding, if your Craftsman is an iron top one, those ugly mill marks are a blessing in disguise. I wish my SawStop and old Jet has those same grind marks.. |
#55
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 05 Feb 2015 11:50:06 -0600
-MIKE- wrote: (I saw your reply to the other post.) Also keep in mind that there is a front and back solid piece of wood bridging the two sides of the sled. The saw blade doesn't cut through these solid pieces, no matter the angle or height of the blade. Something to keep in mind when making yours-- design and build it so those pieces are quite a bit higher than the blade at it's highest setting. I did notice that because I made a fence on my miter that was not but sometimes i like learning the hard way but not always |
#56
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Leon wrote: No kidding, if your Craftsman is an iron top one, those ugly mill marks are a blessing in disguise. I wish my SawStop and old Jet has those same grind marks.. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Simple to do IF you have a Blanchard grinder which I'm not sure if it's even made anymore. Haven't seen one in at least 20 years. Lew |
#57
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 04 Feb 2015 22:41:59 -0600, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet
wrote: On 2/4/2015 9:03 PM, wrote: On Wed, 04 Feb 2015 19:20:45 -0600, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote: On 2/4/2015 7:04 PM, Leon wrote: of that. I've been thinking of trying TopKote (or whatever it's called these days) and even bought a can but it doesn't say anything about preventing rust. Did they change the formula? I really don't like Boeshield but I like rust a lot less. Way back when, when Topcote was originally made by Empire, I bought it to only slick up my TS Top, that is what it was made for. It was great for that but after about 6 months I noticed that I was no longer having an issue with rust. You need to put on a lot the first time, a few coats and the more you use it the better it protects. It is not guaranteed to prevent rust but as a bonus it works better for me than any thing else I have tried. This place is the leas expensive that I have found for TopCote/GlideCote. http://www.cabinethardware.com/Searc...Search=topcote Wow! Free shipping, too. I've seen prices like that but they don't tell you that they charge $15-$20 shipping and handling. Fortunately they are a local place for me that I have been doing business with for 20+ years. I would suspect their web site not determining a correct shipping price.... Seems if there were free shipping there would not be an input location for destination. This store is top notch with very helpful people and they typically beat the pants off of the competition prices. Perhaps, but the location is also used to calculate tax. I went through the order up to where I had to pull the trigger, just to see what their shipping charges were. Of course there could be a mistake but it showed no shipping charges. Either way the average price, elsewhere, for a can is around $18-19. Sure, but shipping can *easily* eat that up. Amazon has some great prices, too, but the shipping charges can absolutely kill ya'. ;-) |
#58
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/2/15, 2:09 PM, dpb wrote:
On 02/02/2015 2:38 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote: ... I vote against Al because it tends to gall/stick worse than steel. Other than that I have no real strong opinion although I am partial hard maple as the material of choice simply 'cuz it's easiest to sneak up on the prefect fit...even the purchased steel runners are typically a little sloppy... -- 'sneak up' is the key here. I've read (and it's true for my tablesaw) that Delta slots are a tad over 3/4". This makes using a piece of 3/4" Aluminum bar not so good unless I use both miter slots and shift the bars together (or apart) to rub on a single edge. Every aftermarket miter slot dodad I have gives me grief. The bulldog featherboard works great, but I have to tighten the snot out of it to get the expanding wedge to grip the miter slot tightly. Using wood lets you get a perfect fit. -BR --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: --- |
#59
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 07:55:27 -0700, Brewster wrote:
On 2/2/15, 2:09 PM, dpb wrote: On 02/02/2015 2:38 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote: ... I vote against Al because it tends to gall/stick worse than steel. Other than that I have no real strong opinion although I am partial hard maple as the material of choice simply 'cuz it's easiest to sneak up on the prefect fit...even the purchased steel runners are typically a little sloppy... -- 'sneak up' is the key here. I've read (and it's true for my tablesaw) that Delta slots are a tad over 3/4". This makes using a piece of 3/4" Aluminum bar not so good unless I use both miter slots and shift the bars together (or apart) to rub on a single edge. Every aftermarket miter slot dodad I have gives me grief. The bulldog featherboard works great, but I have to tighten the snot out of it to get the expanding wedge to grip the miter slot tightly. Using wood lets you get a perfect fit. Incra (and others) make adjustable miter bars to solve this problem. http://www.rockler.com/incrareg-miter-slider-bars |
#60
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/7/15 11:24 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 07:55:27 -0700, Brewster wrote: On 2/2/15, 2:09 PM, dpb wrote: On 02/02/2015 2:38 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote: ... I vote against Al because it tends to gall/stick worse than steel. Other than that I have no real strong opinion although I am partial hard maple as the material of choice simply 'cuz it's easiest to sneak up on the prefect fit...even the purchased steel runners are typically a little sloppy... -- 'sneak up' is the key here. I've read (and it's true for my tablesaw) that Delta slots are a tad over 3/4". This makes using a piece of 3/4" Aluminum bar not so good unless I use both miter slots and shift the bars together (or apart) to rub on a single edge. Every aftermarket miter slot dodad I have gives me grief. The bulldog featherboard works great, but I have to tighten the snot out of it to get the expanding wedge to grip the miter slot tightly. Using wood lets you get a perfect fit. Incra (and others) make adjustable miter bars to solve this problem. http://www.rockler.com/incrareg-miter-slider-bars Those work very well for most applications. But damn if they don't scratch the hell out of everything! :-p Haha! Seriously though, that's a great product. -- -MIKE- "Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life" --Elvin Jones (1927-2004) -- http://mikedrums.com ---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply |
#61
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 12:34:39 -0600, -MIKE-
wrote: On 2/7/15 11:24 AM, wrote: On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 07:55:27 -0700, Brewster wrote: On 2/2/15, 2:09 PM, dpb wrote: On 02/02/2015 2:38 PM, DerbyDad03 wrote: ... I vote against Al because it tends to gall/stick worse than steel. Other than that I have no real strong opinion although I am partial hard maple as the material of choice simply 'cuz it's easiest to sneak up on the prefect fit...even the purchased steel runners are typically a little sloppy... -- 'sneak up' is the key here. I've read (and it's true for my tablesaw) that Delta slots are a tad over 3/4". This makes using a piece of 3/4" Aluminum bar not so good unless I use both miter slots and shift the bars together (or apart) to rub on a single edge. Every aftermarket miter slot dodad I have gives me grief. The bulldog featherboard works great, but I have to tighten the snot out of it to get the expanding wedge to grip the miter slot tightly. Using wood lets you get a perfect fit. Incra (and others) make adjustable miter bars to solve this problem. http://www.rockler.com/incrareg-miter-slider-bars Those work very well for most applications. But damn if they don't scratch the hell out of everything! :-p ;-) Well, I don't slide it across the top. They're supposed to be in the miter slot. Haha! Seriously though, that's a great product. I haven't actually used them, other than on my 1000HD. |
#62
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I would use two hardwood runners instead of a single runner of either. Why, because the two runners gives greater accuracy and the hardwood runners are much easier to replace and have a similar life service time as the aluminum ones. That being said, it all depends on the "hardwood" chosen. For me it would be either jatoba or jarrah, though ipe is certainly a good choice. Deb |
#63
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/7/15, 10:24 AM, wrote:
Incra (and others) make adjustable miter bars to solve this problem. http://www.rockler.com/incrareg-miter-slider-bars I have an Incra miter. This miter uses nylon 'washers' that expand outwards with a screw. In theory it works fine, but on my table saw they are expanded to the limit and tend to wear quickly. The original Delta miter bar has a perfect fit, but the bar is too short to transfer it over to my Incra. I can't really see how the bar sold by Rockler adjusts, I assume it also expands where the slots are. A better solution but with only two points of adjustment there would be issues when the bar has only one of the points in the slot, such as when mitering a wide board. I solved the problem by drilling a bunch of threaded holes through the side of the Incra miter bar and installing set screws with the spring loaded ball bearing tips (problem solved). Being that the OEM Delta bar has a great fit, the sizes seem to be standard within a manufacture (my old Craftsman saw had slots narrower than 3/4"). It would be nice to just be able to buy a miter with a manufacture-specific bar. -BR --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: --- |
#64
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 08 Feb 2015 08:45:09 -0700, Brewster wrote:
On 2/7/15, 10:24 AM, wrote: Incra (and others) make adjustable miter bars to solve this problem. http://www.rockler.com/incrareg-miter-slider-bars I have an Incra miter. This miter uses nylon 'washers' that expand outwards with a screw. In theory it works fine, but on my table saw they are expanded to the limit and tend to wear quickly. The original Delta miter bar has a perfect fit, but the bar is too short to transfer it over to my Incra. I can't really see how the bar sold by Rockler adjusts, I assume it also expands where the slots are. A better solution but with only two points of adjustment there would be issues when the bar has only one of the points in the slot, such as when mitering a wide board. What saw? My '09 Unisaur has a .750" (as close as I can measure it) miter bar. The Incra and JessEm bars are exactly the same. I solved the problem by drilling a bunch of threaded holes through the side of the Incra miter bar and installing set screws with the spring loaded ball bearing tips (problem solved). Being that the OEM Delta bar has a great fit, the sizes seem to be standard within a manufacture (my old Craftsman saw had slots narrower than 3/4"). It would be nice to just be able to buy a miter with a manufacture-specific bar. Nice idea! --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: --- |
#65
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/8/15, 5:01 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 08 Feb 2015 08:45:09 -0700, Brewster wrote: On 2/7/15, 10:24 AM, wrote: Incra (and others) make adjustable miter bars to solve this problem. http://www.rockler.com/incrareg-miter-slider-bars I have an Incra miter. This miter uses nylon 'washers' that expand outwards with a screw. In theory it works fine, but on my table saw they are expanded to the limit and tend to wear quickly. The original Delta miter bar has a perfect fit, but the bar is too short to transfer it over to my Incra. I can't really see how the bar sold by Rockler adjusts, I assume it also expands where the slots are. A better solution but with only two points of adjustment there would be issues when the bar has only one of the points in the slot, such as when mitering a wide board. What saw? My '09 Unisaur has a .750" (as close as I can measure it) miter bar. The Incra and JessEm bars are exactly the same. Unisaur, 2002 thereabouts (Platinum 75th Ed.), .758" My Incara bar is .728". I have some of the blue anodized Rockler miter bar left over from my router table. It measures .748" and is a bit too wobbly on the table saw. I solved the problem by drilling a bunch of threaded holes through the side of the Incra miter bar and installing set screws with the spring loaded ball bearing tips (problem solved). Being that the OEM Delta bar has a great fit, the sizes seem to be standard within a manufacture (my old Craftsman saw had slots narrower than 3/4"). It would be nice to just be able to buy a miter with a manufacture-specific bar. Nice idea! --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: --- --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: --- |
#66
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 09 Feb 2015 10:52:02 -0700, Brewster wrote:
On 2/8/15, 5:01 PM, wrote: On Sun, 08 Feb 2015 08:45:09 -0700, Brewster wrote: On 2/7/15, 10:24 AM, wrote: Incra (and others) make adjustable miter bars to solve this problem. http://www.rockler.com/incrareg-miter-slider-bars I have an Incra miter. This miter uses nylon 'washers' that expand outwards with a screw. In theory it works fine, but on my table saw they are expanded to the limit and tend to wear quickly. The original Delta miter bar has a perfect fit, but the bar is too short to transfer it over to my Incra. I can't really see how the bar sold by Rockler adjusts, I assume it also expands where the slots are. A better solution but with only two points of adjustment there would be issues when the bar has only one of the points in the slot, such as when mitering a wide board. What saw? My '09 Unisaur has a .750" (as close as I can measure it) miter bar. The Incra and JessEm bars are exactly the same. Unisaur, 2002 thereabouts (Platinum 75th Ed.), .758" My Incara bar is .728". Seems the Unisaur isn't that far oversized, rather the Incra is *way* too small and probably defective. I'd ask Incra what its dimension should be. Maybe they'll send a replacement. I have some of the blue anodized Rockler miter bar left over from my router table. It measures .748" and is a bit too wobbly on the table saw. I solved the problem by drilling a bunch of threaded holes through the side of the Incra miter bar and installing set screws with the spring loaded ball bearing tips (problem solved). Being that the OEM Delta bar has a great fit, the sizes seem to be standard within a manufacture (my old Craftsman saw had slots narrower than 3/4"). It would be nice to just be able to buy a miter with a manufacture-specific bar. Nice idea! --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: --- --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: --- |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Show Me Your TS Cross Cut Sled | Woodworking | |||
Video of My Cross Cut Sled | Woodworking | |||
Aluminum sled runner height wrt slot depth, and sled length wrt runners purchased | Woodworking | |||
UHMW Sled Runners | Woodworking | |||
What hardwood for jig runners? | Woodworking |