Why?

No cancer warning labels on the fish!

http://gma.yahoo.com/video/health-26...-29494268.html

Leon wrote:
Why?

No cancer warning labels on the fish!

http://gma.yahoo.com/video/health-26...-29494268.html

But radiation kills cancer.

--
G.W. Ross

Sushi: Known to the rest of the world
as bait.

In article ,
G.W. Ross wrote:
Leon wrote:
Why?

No cancer warning labels on the fish!

http://gma.yahoo.com/video/health-26...-29494268.html

But radiation kills cancer.

Carefully measured and targeted doses of radiation kills cancer cells

--
Stuart Winsor

Only plain text for emails
http://www.asciiribbon.org

On 5/29/2012 3:51 PM, Stuart wrote:
In articleFtudnS9LJfsZgVjSnZ2dnUVZ_gqdnZ2d@giganews. com,
G.W. wrote:
Leon wrote:
Why?

No cancer warning labels on the fish!

http://gma.yahoo.com/video/health-26...-29494268.html

But radiation kills cancer.

Carefully measured and targeted doses of radiation kills cancer cells


Do you think that tuna is going to fill the bill where carefully
measured and targeted is concerned?

Brass does not cause cancer either but brass fittings have the Prop65
cancer warning label.

In article ,
Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote:
But radiation kills cancer.

Carefully measured and targeted doses of radiation kills cancer cells


Do you think that tuna is going to fill the bill where carefully
measured and targeted is concerned?

Well I don't but maybe G.W.Ross does.

Brass does not cause cancer either but brass fittings have the Prop65
cancer warning label.

U.S. thing obviously

--
Stuart Winsor

Only plain text for emails
http://www.asciiribbon.org

Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet writes:
On 5/29/2012 3:51 PM, Stuart wrote:
In articleFtudnS9LJfsZgVjSnZ2dnUVZ_gqdnZ2d@giganews. com,
G.W. wrote:
Leon wrote:
Why?

No cancer warning labels on the fish!

http://gma.yahoo.com/video/health-26...-29494268.html

But radiation kills cancer.

Carefully measured and targeted doses of radiation kills cancer cells


Do you think that tuna is going to fill the bill where carefully
measured and targeted is concerned?


Given that the amount of cesium-134 and cesium-137 found in the tuna emitted
radiation at less than background levels, there are no health effects, just
FUD effects.

One should be far more worried about the levels of Hg in tuna.

"Leon" lcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote in message
news
Why?

No cancer warning labels on the fish!

http://gma.yahoo.com/video/health-26...-29494268.html

"how water?"

That doesn't make any sense.

On 5/29/2012 6:51 PM, Stuart wrote:
In articlenOKdnUjflbYq2VjSnZ2dnUVZ5oWdnZ2d@giganews. com,
Leonlcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote:
But radiation kills cancer.

Carefully measured and targeted doses of radiation kills cancer cells


Do you think that tuna is going to fill the bill where carefully
measured and targeted is concerned?

Well I don't but maybe G.W.Ross does.

Probably not. ;~)




Brass does not cause cancer either but brass fittings have the Prop65
cancer warning label.

U.S. thing obviously



No, it is a California thing. LOL

On 5/29/2012 6:54 PM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
Leonlcb11211@swbelldotnet writes:
On 5/29/2012 3:51 PM, Stuart wrote:
In articleFtudnS9LJfsZgVjSnZ2dnUVZ_gqdnZ2d@giganews. com,
G.W. wrote:
Leon wrote:
Why?

No cancer warning labels on the fish!

http://gma.yahoo.com/video/health-26...-29494268.html

But radiation kills cancer.

Carefully measured and targeted doses of radiation kills cancer cells


Do you think that tuna is going to fill the bill where carefully
measured and targeted is concerned?


Given that the amount of cesium-134 and cesium-137 found in the tuna emitted
radiation at less than background levels, there are no health effects, just
FUD effects.

Yeah, I think that is what the link mentioned.


One should be far more worried about the levels of Hg in tuna.

On 5/29/2012 7:09 PM, Steve B wrote:
"Leon"lcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote in message
news
Why?

No cancer warning labels on the fish!

http://gma.yahoo.com/video/health-26...-29494268.html

"how water?"

That doesn't make any sense.



oops, Hot

You should know by now that "I"
Seldom/NEVER write anything down perfectly. Thank you for getting
clarification before pressing the big black nuclear launch button. ;~)

On Wed, 30 May 2012 07:02:24 -0500, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet
You should know by now that "I"
Seldom/NEVER write anything down perfectly. Thank you for getting
clarification before pressing the big black nuclear launch button. ;~)

Well, just in case any of you suspect that you are around any
Californian radioactive fish, I have the perfect SmartPhone for you.

http://www.itbusiness.ca/it/client/e...t7824&xdm_p=1&

On 5/29/2012 12:29 PM, Leon wrote:
Why?

No cancer warning labels on the fish!

http://gma.yahoo.com/video/health-26...-29494268.html


Radiation? Yes. But radiation so low that highly specialized methods and
equipment were required to separate it from the natural background
radiation and low enough that you would be required to eat thousands of
pounds of that expensive bluefin (sushi) tuna in a year to approach the
acknowledged unsafe dosage. This is not your average grocery store canned
(nor fresh) tuna. Most of the bluefin caught off of California and Mexico
are frozen and shipped to Japan to be sold to the sushi restaurants for
exorbitant prices.