Communists, Marxists, Nazi's, Dictators, Liberals, today's Democratic and
Republican parties are on the left.

Apostrohphe's and they're use's, ****-nozzle.

"Jack Stein" wrote in message
...
A Fly wrote:
Communists, Marxists, Nazi's, Dictators, Liberals, today's Democratic
and Republican parties are on the left.

Apostrohphe's and they're use's, ****-nozzle.

Not interested, dick head.

But if I were interested, its uses not use's, Frog bait!


Learn to spell it's, ****-nozzle.

A Fly wrote:
Communists, Marxists, Nazi's, Dictators, Liberals, today's Democratic and
Republican parties are on the left.

Apostrohphe's and they're use's, ****-nozzle.

Not interested, dick head.

But if I were interested, its uses not use's, Frog bait!

--
Jack
Using FREE News Server: http://www.eternal-september.org/
http://jbstein.com

A Fly wrote:
"Jack Stein" wrote in message
...
A Fly wrote:
Communists, Marxists, Nazi's, Dictators, Liberals, today's
Democratic and Republican parties are on the left.

Apostrohphe's and they're use's, ****-nozzle.

Not interested, dick head.

But if I were interested, its uses not use's, Frog bait!


Learn to spell it's, ****-nozzle.

His spelling of "its" is correct. Your use of "they're" is wrong.

But don't despair. The law of apostrophes states that "For every
inappropriate use of an apostrophe, somewhere in the universe there is
another inappropriate use."

On Sep 2, 5:03*pm, "HeyBub" wrote:
A Fly wrote:
"Jack Stein" wrote in message
...
A Fly wrote:
Communists, Marxists, Nazi's, Dictators, Liberals, today's
Democratic and Republican parties are on the left.

Apostrohphe's and they're use's, ****-nozzle.

Not interested, dick head.

But if I were interested, its uses not use's, Frog bait!

Learn to spell it's, ****-nozzle.

His spelling of "its" is correct. Your use of "they're" is wrong.

But don't despair. The law of apostrophes states that "For every
inappropriate use of an apostrophe, somewhere in the universe there is
another inappropriate use."

In the sentence:
But if I were interested, its uses not use's, Frog bait!
its stands for it is in the above sentence... abbreviated that becomes
it's. Its is possessive.
You're best to keep your corrections accurate. There is no way to
change their minds, They're just too ...whatever..

....and I keep on teaching.

HeyBub wrote:
A Fly wrote:
"Jack Stein" wrote in message
...
A Fly wrote:
Communists, Marxists, Nazi's, Dictators, Liberals, today's
Democratic and Republican parties are on the left.
Apostrohphe's and they're use's, ****-nozzle.
Not interested, dick head.

But if I were interested, its uses not use's, Frog bait!

Learn to spell it's, ****-nozzle.

His spelling of "its" is correct. Your use of "they're" is wrong.

As Robatoy already pointed out, I'm afraid your correction is incorrect. And I believe "A
Fly" was being sarcastic and trying to make a point by his incorrect use of "they're" and
other misplaced punctuation, to which you and Jack both fell victim. But what I would like
to know is whether or not "****-nozzle" should be hyphenated; about that I'm not sure...

But don't despair. The law of apostrophes states that "For every
inappropriate use of an apostrophe, somewhere in the universe there is
another inappropriate use."

In another group that I follow one moron uses apostrophes EVERYWHERE, and I finally told him
one day that if he were to just stop using them, at all, EVER, he would be correct more
often than he currently was. I think he responded with some apostrophe laden insult and
continued to utterly ignore my advice. Oh well. :-)

--
Any given amount of traffic flow, no matter how
sparse, will expand to fill all available lanes.
To reply, eat the taco.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bbqboyee/

On 2009-09-02, Tim Daneliuk wrote:

I think it depends on whether you're using it as a proper noun,
a common noun, a countable noun, or a collective noun. Then again,
in certain circumstances, it might also be a verb.

Wow! An apostrophe ****ing contest. It's ok to **** on apostrophes.

nb

Robatoy wrote:

Not interested, dick head.

But if I were interested, its uses not use's, Frog bait!

Learn to spell it's, ****-nozzle.

His spelling of "its" is correct. Your use of "they're" is wrong.

But don't despair. The law of apostrophes states that "For every
inappropriate use of an apostrophe, somewhere in the universe there
is another inappropriate use."

In the sentence:
But if I were interested, its uses not use's, Frog bait!
its stands for it is in the above sentence... abbreviated that becomes
it's. Its is possessive.

You're best to keep your corrections accurate. There is no way to
change their minds, They're just too ...whatever..

...and I keep on teaching.

I was wrong.

In my defense, the 17-year-old Mexican girl I hired to do the housework was
under my desk at the time, trying to pull down my trousers, and I got
distracted.

"HeyBub" wrote in message
In my defense, the 17-year-old Mexican girl I hired to do the housework
was
under my desk at the time, trying to pull down my trousers, and I got
distracted.

There's dust in your trousers?

On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 09:50:25 -0400, "Upscale"
wrote:


"HeyBub" wrote in message
In my defense, the 17-year-old Mexican girl I hired to do the housework
was
under my desk at the time, trying to pull down my trousers, and I got
distracted.

There's dust in your trousers?

Saw dust?

Upscale wrote:
"HeyBub" wrote in message
In my defense, the 17-year-old Mexican girl I hired to do the
housework was under my desk at the time, trying to pull down my
trousers, and I got distracted.

There's dust in your trousers?

My gift to the benighted. I was teaching her to pull back the foreskin of
science.

On Sep 4, 7:50*am, "HeyBub" wrote:
Upscale wrote:
"HeyBub" wrote in message
In my defense, the 17-year-old Mexican girl I hired to do the
housework was under my desk at the time, trying to pull down my
trousers, and I got distracted.

There's dust in your trousers?

My gift to the benighted. I was teaching her to pull back the foreskin of
science.

A minor draw-back at best?

"HeyBub" wrote in
m:

Upscale wrote:
"HeyBub" wrote in message
In my defense, the 17-year-old Mexican girl I hired to do the
housework was under my desk at the time, trying to pull down my
trousers, and I got distracted.

There's dust in your trousers?

My gift to the benighted. I was teaching her to pull back the foreskin
of science.


I'm sure all she found was the smegma of smugness.