Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Jack Stein wrote: There are crazy people on both the right and left. The right however, is made up of people that go for less government control, the left is made up of those wanting more government control. All the way on the That's not even close to true any more. The right wants plenty of control, just in different arenas than the left. I think you are confusing Republican party with the right. The sole place where the right is demonstrably superior is in its view of national defense - i.e. It actually wants to defend the nation, whereas the left wants to wring its hands and figure out why every problem is our own fault. I don't agree. The right, besides national defense, believes strongly in personal property rights, capitalism, individual control of the means of production rather than government control, the constitution and the bill of rights (freedom of speech, religion, the press, right to bear arms and so on). left is Total government control (totalitarianism), all the way on the right is No government control (anarchy). There is no reason to complicate it more than that. The left has been trying to hide this simple mantra for many years. Communists, Marxists, Nazi's, Dictators, Liberals, today's Democratic and Republican parties are on the left. Conservatives and Libertarians are on the right. You are clearly on the right, no reason on earth to deny it. Most Americans are on the right I think, even if they are too ill-informed to know their political party has been usurped by the left. Well, Republicans seem to know, but Dems are mostly clueless it seems. The discussion in not along a line, it is in two dimensions: Yeah, 2 dimensions: The left and the right. http://www.quiz2d.com/quiz/Libertari...&economic=97.7 There are *two* dimensions to this debate and they are not trivially just "right" and "left". I dunno, I look at your 2 dimensions and I see top and bottom rather than left or right. Same thing, turned on the side, but much less clear. Your picture shows the Liberals, conservatives and centrists all on the same plane. That is wrong. It would be wrong if you went left to right rather than top and bottom and put them in the middle. And, no, I am not on the right - I am very much in the "Radical Libertarian" corner... The radical libertarian corner is on the right, more to the right than a conservative perhaps, but very much on the right. The right is for individual freedom, all the way to the right is anarchy, or, total individual freedom. In fact, the only real common ground I have with today's right is an opposition to abortion and a support for their more-or-less hawkish foreign policy. Only if you have a unique view of the right and left. From what I see, you are on the right. OK, you are on the top end of your scale, while Obama, Hitler, Castro, Chavez and that ilk are on the bottom. See, some of us are able to think for ourselves and don't need to wear the t-shirt to know what we actually believe ... I think everyone thinks for themselves. The fact you and I agree on most everything doesn't mean you, or I don't think for ourselves any more than Upscale thinking like a socialist such as Obama doesn't mean he doesn't think for himself. His empty, inane arguments only make him look like he doesn't do much thinking:-) The "usual right wing mantras" you list up there are imo, not very accurate. These things exist of course, but they are more a figment of the lefts imagination, just like the left associating Hitler and the NAZI's with the right, when clearly, Hitler was a dictator and 100% to the left, just like Obama, Chavez and other Marxists socialists of our time. I think you underestimate the degree to which that stuff exists on the right. I know it exists on the right, it also exists on the left. Still, considering the right (or the top) supports individual freedom while the left supports government control puts you squarely on the right side of the spectrum. The right was so worried about things like the definition of marriage, people's drug habits, the role of religion in public life, and so on that they conceded the last election to a raging radical-cum- Marxist. It is pretty much true that we have the right to thank for this vile presidency. I think you have ACORN, the left wing media and the Republican party to blame more than anything. Besides the fake voting, the American public was not made very aware that Obama was an anti-American, socialist *******. They were all too busy watching Law and Order, American Idol and David Letterman, then the "Republicans" run McCain. It's like, here, we have a liberal old loser running against a liberal young loser. The left was inspired, the right went to sleep. Next thing you know, we lose General Motors and get Government Motors. I'll be happy when Robocop needs a heart valve and comes to the USSA and is told he has to wait 6 months, just like he does at home. -- Jack Got change: Doctor care ==== Bureaucrat don't care! http://jbstein.com |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I feel that this would be an appropriate point in the discussion to
point out that we had a republican vice president who actually DID shoot someone, he also was not tried or convicted of any crime. -- There are no stupid questions, but there are lots of stupid answers. Larry Wasserman - Baltimore Maryland - lwasserm(a)sdf. lonestar. org |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry W wrote:
I feel that this would be an appropriate point in the discussion to point out that we had a republican vice president who actually DID shoot someone, he also was not tried or convicted of any crime. Perhaps the victim was dressed up as a Democrat? -- Jack Using FREE News Server: http://www.eternal-september.org/ http://jbstein.com |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry W wrote:
I feel that this would be an appropriate point in the discussion to point out that we had a republican vice president who actually DID shoot someone, he also was not tried or convicted of any crime. You're wrong. The Vice President was indicted in both New York and New Jersey. In one jurisdiction, the trial resulted in an acquittal, in the other the charge was dismissed. Didn't matter, though. Alexander Hamilton was still dead. And Aaron Burr was both a Democrat and a Republican. |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Larry W" wrote in message ... I feel that this would be an appropriate point in the discussion to point out that we had a republican vice president who actually DID shoot someone, he also was not tried or convicted of any crime. Nor was he charged as no crime was found to be committed. He did not leave his victim trapped under water either |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Edward | Woodworking | |||
Edward [OT] | Woodworking | |||
Edward [OT] | Woodworking |