Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was at the yard where I get most of my pine yesterday and I
overheard a conversation about Saw Stop. One of the guys was saying that the Saw Stop safety mechanism will sometimes engage when no hand/finger/whatever touched the blade. Any of you guys have experience with Saw Stop? Thanks, J |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My understanding is that if any embedded metal touches the blade it
will activate the stop mechanism. Also wet or green lumber can also trigger it. Basically I think anything that has a lower resistance than dry wood will result in activation, so maybe some painted and laminated surfaces will trip it as well. I'm researching the SawStop for purchase by a school district and have contacted the manufacture directly and received a reply, but I still don't have a reliable answer to some questions. Like what happens with a fast feed rate? On their website (www.sawstop.com) they have a video that shows a hotdog being pushed into the blade and the result of the blade stopping just nicking the surface of the hotdog, but nowhere is it mentioned the feed rate a which this demonstration was done. Also, they don't have any data (at least none that they would share with me) related to kickbacks. As I'm sure everyone here is aware the speed at which a kickback occurs, I have doubts on the usefulness of the SawStop mechanism in a kickback situation. Mort Joe Bemier wrote: I was at the yard where I get most of my pine yesterday and I overheard a conversation about Saw Stop. One of the guys was saying that the Saw Stop safety mechanism will sometimes engage when no hand/finger/whatever touched the blade. Any of you guys have experience with Saw Stop? Thanks, J |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9 Jul 2006 12:21:44 -0700, in rec.woodworking, "Mort Stevens"
wrote: On their website (www.sawstop.com) they have a video that shows a hotdog being pushed into the blade and the result of the blade stopping just nicking the surface of the hotdog, but nowhere is it mentioned the feed rate a which this demonstration was done. This was actually the first time I'd heard of this impressive system, but http://www.sawstop.com/how-it-works-overview.htm says the following about the hotdog video: "The photo at the right shows what happens on a SawStop saw when a hotdog (representing a finger) hits the spinning blade at a speed of about 1 foot per second. " Forrest -- Forrest Anderson Edinburgh Scotland |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9 Jul 2006 12:21:44 -0700, "Mort Stevens"
wrote: My understanding is that if any embedded metal touches the blade it will activate the stop mechanism. Also wet or green lumber can also trigger it. Basically I think anything that has a lower resistance than dry wood will result in activation, so maybe some painted and laminated surfaces will trip it as well. I'm researching the SawStop for purchase by a school district and have contacted the manufacture directly and received a reply, but I still don't have a reliable answer to some questions. Like what happens with a fast feed rate? On their website (www.sawstop.com) they have a video that shows a hotdog being pushed into the blade and the result of the blade stopping just nicking the surface of the hotdog, but nowhere is it mentioned the feed rate a which this demonstration was done. Also, they don't have any data (at least none that they would share with me) related to kickbacks. As I'm sure everyone here is aware the speed at which a kickback occurs, I have doubts on the usefulness of the SawStop mechanism in a kickback situation. Mort Joe Bemier wrote: I was at the yard where I get most of my pine yesterday and I overheard a conversation about Saw Stop. One of the guys was saying that the Saw Stop safety mechanism will sometimes engage when no hand/finger/whatever touched the blade. Any of you guys have experience with Saw Stop? Thanks, J Thanks, Mort - very useful. Also, very interesting that you should mention feed rate because those guys touched on that point and I did not recall it until I read your message. Considering the cost of replacement of the mechanism I would need to feel confident that the thing is not going to trigger due to say *imperfections* of some kind. Unfortunately, I was not able to get more info but it sounded like one of the guys owned the machine and was not happy with it. Good luck with your research. My concern with having these machies in a school would be that kids might develop a sense of security working on one and then go out into the real world and use a conventional saw and have an accident. Also, I did not consider Kickbacks but I'll bet you are correct. Thanks, J |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Joe Bemier" wrote in message
... Thanks, Mort - very useful. Also, very interesting that you should mention feed rate because those guys touched on that point and I did not recall it until I read your message. Considering the cost of replacement of the mechanism I would need to feel confident that the thing is not going to trigger due to say *imperfections* of some kind. Unfortunately, I was not able to get more info but it sounded like one of the guys owned the machine and was not happy with it. Good luck with your research. My concern with having these machies in a school would be that kids might develop a sense of security working on one and then go out into the real world and use a conventional saw and have an accident. You know, I think I could watch that thing fire on 10 hot dogs and not develop a sense of security to putting my hand into the blade. todd |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Joe Bemier wrote: On 9 Jul 2006 12:21:44 -0700, "Mort Stevens" wrote: I'm researching the SawStop for purchase by a school district and have contacted the manufacture directly and received a reply, but I still don't have a reliable answer to some questions. Like what happens with a fast feed rate? On their website (www.sawstop.com) they have a video that shows a hotdog being pushed into the blade and the result of the blade stopping just nicking the surface of the hotdog, but nowhere is it mentioned the feed rate a which this demonstration was done. Considering the cost of replacement of the mechanism I would need to feel confident that the thing is not going to trigger due to say *imperfections* of some kind. Forget the cost of the mechanisms. Even if they trigger once a week your insurer is certain to order you to upgrade as soon as the insurance contract re-ups. One trip to the emergency room with a student will buy one heck of a lot of cartridges and blades. The review I read stated there was a test mechanism you could use to see if the machine was likely to trigger. |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
Joe Bemier wrote: On 9 Jul 2006 12:21:44 -0700, "Mort Stevens" wrote: I'm researching the SawStop for purchase by a school district and have contacted the manufacture directly and received a reply, but I still don't have a reliable answer to some questions. Like what happens with a fast feed rate? On their website (www.sawstop.com) they have a video that shows a hotdog being pushed into the blade and the result of the blade stopping just nicking the surface of the hotdog, but nowhere is it mentioned the feed rate a which this demonstration was done. Considering the cost of replacement of the mechanism I would need to feel confident that the thing is not going to trigger due to say *imperfections* of some kind. Forget the cost of the mechanisms. Even if they trigger once a week your insurer is certain to order you to upgrade as soon as the insurance contract re-ups. Do you have any incident to relate in which an insurer "ordered" a school district to replace all of its non-sawstop saws? One trip to the emergency room with a student will buy one heck of a lot of cartridges and blades. The review I read stated there was a test mechanism you could use to see if the machine was likely to trigger. -- --John to email, dial "usenet" and validate (was jclarke at eye bee em dot net) |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
J. Clarke wrote:
Forget the cost of the mechanisms. Even if they trigger once a week your insurer is certain to order you to upgrade as soon as the insurance contract re-ups. Do you have any incident to relate in which an insurer "ordered" a school district to replace all of its non-sawstop saws? Not yet, but my work is in the risk management field. It is close to being a metaphysical certainty that the insurers will do this as soon as they realize that there is an option. The cost of replacing a table saw with a saw stop is trivial, $3500 is nothing compared to the cost of a negligence lawsuit. The risk of injury is clearly very high, the cost of the injury anywhere up to a million dollars or so (kid loses hand). If you want to make something happen fast there are two ways to do it, either you make it an audit requirement or you make it an insurance requirement. |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I saw a demo at a wood show and they putshed the hot dog in at a really fast
feed rate. They operator said he wanted to be able so show at least a small mark on the hotdot so he gave the sled that the hotdog on a real fast jolt forward, way faster then you would ever feed wood. It was a real jolt. The hotdog had a very small nick in the outercasing of the hotdog. It was so small it almost didnt even cut through the outer casing. I imagine if it was your finger you would not have a drop of blood even. It was really amazing. "Mort Stevens" wrote in message oups.com... My understanding is that if any embedded metal touches the blade it will activate the stop mechanism. Also wet or green lumber can also trigger it. Basically I think anything that has a lower resistance than dry wood will result in activation, so maybe some painted and laminated surfaces will trip it as well. I'm researching the SawStop for purchase by a school district and have contacted the manufacture directly and received a reply, but I still don't have a reliable answer to some questions. Like what happens with a fast feed rate? On their website (www.sawstop.com) they have a video that shows a hotdog being pushed into the blade and the result of the blade stopping just nicking the surface of the hotdog, but nowhere is it mentioned the feed rate a which this demonstration was done. Also, they don't have any data (at least none that they would share with me) related to kickbacks. As I'm sure everyone here is aware the speed at which a kickback occurs, I have doubts on the usefulness of the SawStop mechanism in a kickback situation. Mort Joe Bemier wrote: I was at the yard where I get most of my pine yesterday and I overheard a conversation about Saw Stop. One of the guys was saying that the Saw Stop safety mechanism will sometimes engage when no hand/finger/whatever touched the blade. Any of you guys have experience with Saw Stop? Thanks, J |
#10
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mort Stevens" wrote in message oups.com... My understanding is that if any embedded metal touches the blade it will activate the stop mechanism. Also wet or green lumber can also trigger it. Basically I think anything that has a lower resistance than dry wood will result in activation, so maybe some painted and laminated surfaces will trip it as well. You should do a little research before making these assumptions. According to SawStop, wet lumber is not a problem. I'm researching the SawStop for purchase by a school district and have contacted the manufacture directly and received a reply, but I still don't have a reliable answer to some questions. Like what happens with a fast feed rate? On their website (www.sawstop.com) they have a video that shows a hotdog being pushed into the blade and the result of the blade stopping just nicking the surface of the hotdog, but nowhere is it mentioned the feed rate a which this demonstration was done. A cut is better than an amputation. Also, they don't have any data (at least none that they would share with me) related to kickbacks. As I'm sure everyone here is aware the speed at which a kickback occurs, I have doubts on the usefulness of the SawStop mechanism in a kickback situation. SawStop is not supposed to prevent kickbacks. That said however it is one of the few brands that offer a riving knife in the US. You still have to use you head, its still not a good idea to look down a gun barrel even though the gun has a safety. |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mort Stevens" wrote in message oups.com... My understanding is that if any embedded metal touches the blade it will activate the stop mechanism. Also wet or green lumber can also trigger it. Basically I think anything that has a lower resistance than dry wood will result in activation, so maybe some painted and laminated surfaces will trip it as well. I'm researching the SawStop for purchase by a school district and have contacted the manufacture directly and received a reply, but I still don't have a reliable answer to some questions. Like what happens with a fast feed rate? On their website (www.sawstop.com) they have a video that shows a hotdog being pushed into the blade and the result of the blade stopping just nicking the surface of the hotdog, but nowhere is it mentioned the feed rate a which this demonstration was done. Also, they don't have any data (at least none that they would share with me) related to kickbacks. As I'm sure everyone here is aware the speed at which a kickback occurs, I have doubts on the usefulness of the SawStop mechanism in a kickback situation. The riving knife is for the kickbacks.... not the SawStop mechanism. On that note look up information on kickbacks and riving knives and you will find that they are effective (if you actually use it!). John |
#12
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I was thinking more in terms of what would happen if the kickback would take your hand into the blade, would the mechanism activate fast enough to prevent serious injury. Mort John Grossbohlin wrote: The riving knife is for the kickbacks.... not the SawStop mechanism. On that note look up information on kickbacks and riving knives and you will find that they are effective (if you actually use it!). John |
#13
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If a kick back takes your hand into the blade, you're feeding from the wrong
end of the saw. "Mort Stevens" wrote in message ups.com... I was thinking more in terms of what would happen if the kickback would take your hand into the blade, would the mechanism activate fast enough to prevent serious injury. Mort John Grossbohlin wrote: The riving knife is for the kickbacks.... not the SawStop mechanism. On that note look up information on kickbacks and riving knives and you will find that they are effective (if you actually use it!). John |
#14
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
CW wrote:
If a kick back takes your hand into the blade, you're feeding from the wrong end of the saw. Hi A common result of kickbacks is that a saw operator will reflexively push down on a workpiece that starts to lift off the table (No, I can't quote my source, but OHSA will back me up.). My FIL worked with a very experienced carpenter who did this and rip cut his hand between his 3rd and 4th fingers. SawStop won't eliminate kickbacks, but it should stop the blade if you push your meaty hand into it. Play safe drifwood |
#15
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mort Stevens" wrote in message ups.com... I was thinking more in terms of what would happen if the kickback would take your hand into the blade, would the mechanism activate fast enough to prevent serious injury. If that were possible, yes it would. The blade does not really care from what direction it is touched to transfer the signal to engage the Stop. |
#16
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Joe Bemier wrote:
I was at the yard where I get most of my pine yesterday and I overheard a conversation about Saw Stop. One of the guys was saying that the Saw Stop safety mechanism will sometimes engage when no hand/finger/whatever touched the blade. Any of you guys have experience with Saw Stop? Oh, geez, here we go *again*. SawStop has been discussed here (and just plain cussed) at great length _at_least_ three different times. :-b Do a Google Groups search on this NG for Saw Stop (or SawStop, without the space) and "false positive". I imagine you'll find a bit of info... -- Regards, Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com) It's time to throw all their damned tea in the harbor again. |
#17
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#18
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Joe Bemier" wrote in message ... Sorry if it seems redundant - my search turned up some info but I did not see muc detail regarding *false stops* or false positives as you put it. Some false stops reported here were due to a user using a particular electronic watch that fooled the saw. IIRC the manufacturer sent a resistor to ad to the saw to solve this problem. |
#19
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Leon wrote: "Joe Bemier" wrote in message .. . Sorry if it seems redundant - my search turned up some info but I did not see muc detail regarding *false stops* or false positives as you put it. Some false stops reported here were due to a user using a particular electronic watch that fooled the saw. IIRC the manufacturer sent a resistor to ad to the saw to solve this problem. That's a good one. Someone using a sawstop, but wearing a watch while operating it. -- Larry Wasserman Baltimore, Maryland |
#20
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message news ![]() That's a good one. Someone using a sawstop, but wearing a watch while operating it. "Particular" electronic watch. Seems like it was a digital. |
#21
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Joe Bemier" wrote in message ... I was at the yard where I get most of my pine yesterday and I overheard a conversation about Saw Stop. One of the guys was saying that the Saw Stop safety mechanism will sometimes engage when no hand/finger/whatever touched the blade. Any of you guys have experience with Saw Stop? Thanks, J Google this group and you will see tons of discussion on this topic. |
#22
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 18:57:28 GMT, "Stoutman" .@. wrote:
"Joe Bemier" wrote in message .. . I was at the yard where I get most of my pine yesterday and I overheard a conversation about Saw Stop. One of the guys was saying that the Saw Stop safety mechanism will sometimes engage when no hand/finger/whatever touched the blade. Any of you guys have experience with Saw Stop? Thanks, J Google this group and you will see tons of discussion on this topic. Hello Stout - I did and my Reply is below. But, this does bring me to add my two cents on the subject of *redundancy of topic* as this seems to come up from time-to-time. I woulld suggest to you guys that there is nothing wrong with such under certain (probably many) circumstances. At times I get the feeling that once a Thread -with a particular Subject- has been posted and run its course, that is supposed to close the door on the subject. For example; because we had a post on Saw Stop I am supposed to search and read. If I don't find an adequate answer to my currrent question - too bad. This attitude assumes that everything anyone ever wanted to know about the subject was contained within that original Thread and there can be no further input, no new information, no additional opinions, etc. From my perspective this group has a significant number of members who float in and out. It is possible that not everyone with something to say added to that original message. Further, in this case the subject deals with a rather new technology. There might be new information. In fact, I was here on the group when the thread passed through earlier this year. Before I posted today I looked at the SS website (again) and then googled and yahoo'ed the subject. I was still not satisfied that I had an answer so I posted the specific question. At the very least I can hope that the thread helps Mort make his decision. Cheers, J |
#23
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hello Stout - I did and my Reply is below. If you did, you wouldn't be asking the same question that has been asked and reanswered several times. Your question "Any of you guys have experience with Saw Stop?". Googling Saw Stop alone would have revealed that, Yes, several people have experience with Saw Stop. Your statements regarding the "safety mechanism" and its tendency to engage with no flesh contact, has also been discussed ad nauseam. Your are more than welcome to ask this question on a daily basis (it's a free world), but nevertheless I though my suggestion might be helpful. Flame me if you want... Before I posted today I looked at the SS website (again) and then googled and yahoo'ed the subject. I was still not satisfied that I had an answer so I posted the specific question." You weren't satisfied when you found out that several people have had experience with Saw Stop? |
#24
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Joe Bemier" wrote in message ... I was at the yard where I get most of my pine yesterday and I overheard a conversation about Saw Stop. One of the guys was saying that the Saw Stop safety mechanism will sometimes engage when no hand/finger/whatever touched the blade. Any of you guys have experience with Saw Stop? Thanks, J Most of the owners like the saw even though some have reported some false stops. The manufacturer helped solve the problem. LeeValley is replacing all of their work shop saws in their store with the SawStop. FWIW I would much rather have a false stop than not have a stop when it is suppose to stop. |
#25
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Joe Bemier wrote: I was at the yard where I get most of my pine yesterday and I overheard a conversation about Saw Stop. One of the guys was saying that the Saw Stop safety mechanism will sometimes engage when no hand/finger/whatever touched the blade. Any of you guys have experience with Saw Stop? Thanks, J A google search of rec.woodworking will turn up a thread a few months ago. In this thread a small commercial shop had some mis-fires that were eventually diagnosed to one particular employee. A filter sent free of charge by Sawstop, prevented further mis-fires, and a few days later this same employee had his thumb saved by the mechanism. Alan |
#26
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joe Bemier wrote:
Any of you guys have experience with Saw Stop? Thanks, J I think some of the concerns folks have relate to it providing a false sense of security. You still need to treat with the same respect as any other tablesaw. It can, and will, kickback with some impressive force. It's like airbags in a car. You still need a seatbelt. You still need to drive safely. People that don't fasten their seatbelts because, "I've got airbags," or are careless with their table saw because, "It's a SawStop," are just accidents waiting to happen. Like Ron White says: "You can't fix stupid." That said, I've been running one for about 6 months now and have had no misfires to date. I consider it a worthwhile investment on 2 fronts: 1) If I should have an attack of stupidity, it should, at the very least, leave me fixable. 2) It gives SWMBO peace of mind when I'm down in the shop. One parting FYI, SawStop and Freud dados reportedly do not play well together. Something like the Freud being a bit smaller than 8" and not supplying a strong enough signal to prevent false positives. The SawStop rep said the Forrester dado was known to work, so I went with that instead of the Freud. This may have been fixed by now, but as I have a working dado, I have no inclination to persue it. dcm |
#27
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Devon Miller" wrote in message ups.com... Snip The SawStop rep said the Forrester dado was known to work, so I went with that instead of the Freud. Subaru makes dado blades now? :~) |
#28
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Leon wrote: "Devon Miller" wrote in message ups.com... Snip The SawStop rep said the Forrester dado was known to work, so I went with that instead of the Freud. Subaru makes dado blades now? :~) A drum set falls down the hill -- barump bum. Yeah, my bad, that should have been Forrest as in Forrest Dado King, not Forrester as in 4-wheel drive. dcm |
#29
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10 Jul 2006 14:28:14 -0700, "Devon Miller"
wrote: Yeah, my bad, that should have been Forrest as in Forrest Dado King, not Forrester as in 4-wheel drive. Heh, my first thought was "Dr. Clayton Forrester" of MST3K fame. ![]() |
#30
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10 Jul 2006 12:52:57 -0700, "Devon Miller"
wrote: Joe Bemier wrote: Any of you guys have experience with Saw Stop? Thanks, J I think some of the concerns folks have relate to it providing a false sense of security. You still need to treat with the same respect as any other tablesaw. It can, and will, kickback with some impressive force. It's like airbags in a car. You still need a seatbelt. You still need to drive safely. People that don't fasten their seatbelts because, "I've got airbags," or are careless with their table saw because, "It's a SawStop," are just accidents waiting to happen. Like Ron White says: "You can't fix stupid." That said, I've been running one for about 6 months now and have had no misfires to date. I consider it a worthwhile investment on 2 fronts: 1) If I should have an attack of stupidity, it should, at the very least, leave me fixable. 2) It gives SWMBO peace of mind when I'm down in the shop. One parting FYI, SawStop and Freud dados reportedly do not play well together. Something like the Freud being a bit smaller than 8" and not supplying a strong enough signal to prevent false positives. The SawStop rep said the Forrester dado was known to work, so I went with that instead of the Freud. This may have been fixed by now, but as I have a working dado, I have no inclination to persue it. dcm Thanks very much, Devon - high value info. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
CH. push fit stop ends | UK diy | |||
How to stop sway of a tall cabinet? | Home Repair | |||
safety question - many short cut-offs using a stop | Woodworking | |||
Powermatic 66 45 Degree tilt stop | Woodworking | |||
Slow leak on compression joint - can't access stop cock | UK diy |