Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
why no really long-bed 6" jointers
It seems like the common bed size for a 6" jointer is about 45". You can get at least a few that are 55" (General International and King Industrial, maybe others, then the Powermatic at 66". It seems like stepping up to an 8" jointer generally gets you up to the 74" length. Here's my question. Given that many people want to joint long boards, but don't necessarily need the additional width, why don't manufacturers sell 6" jointers with really long beds? Do they basically assume that if you want the extra length you'll pay for the extra width? Is it just too hard to make a long skinny bed flat? Just curious... Chris |
#2
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
why no really long-bed 6" jointers
Chris Friesen wrote:
It seems like the common bed size for a 6" jointer is about 45". You can get at least a few that are 55" (General International and King Industrial, maybe others, then the Powermatic at 66". It seems like stepping up to an 8" jointer generally gets you up to the 74" length. Here's my question. Given that many people want to joint long boards, but don't necessarily need the additional width, why don't manufacturers sell 6" jointers with really long beds? Do they basically assume that if you want the extra length you'll pay for the extra width? Is it just too hard to make a long skinny bed flat? Just curious... Chris not enough room to dedicate to one longer? Cost? Weight and shipping cost? difficulty keeping overly long tables from remaining perfectly parallel? to name a few... Dave |
#3
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
why no really long-bed 6" jointers
Presumably because there is no demand for them.
99% of the people who want a long jointer also want a wide jointer. To build one for the other 1% isn't economical, especially when they will just buy a 8" if they can't find a long 6". |
#4
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
why no really long-bed 6" jointers
On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 17:08:43 -0600, Chris Friesen
wrote: It seems like the common bed size for a 6" jointer is about 45". You can get at least a few that are 55" (General International and King Industrial, maybe others, then the Powermatic at 66". It seems like stepping up to an 8" jointer generally gets you up to the 74" length. Here's my question. Given that many people want to joint long boards, but don't necessarily need the additional width, why don't manufacturers sell 6" jointers with really long beds? Do they basically assume that if you want the extra length you'll pay for the extra width? Is it just too hard to make a long skinny bed flat? Just curious... Chris I can't answer your question, but even if you really don't need to joint a 8" edge, having an 8" jointer allows you to move the fence to more areas of the blade, extending the time required between sharpening. |
#5
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
why no really long-bed 6" jointers
On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 17:08:43 -0600, Chris Friesen
wrote: It seems like the common bed size for a 6" jointer is about 45". You can get at least a few that are 55" (General International and King Industrial, maybe others, then the Powermatic at 66". It seems like stepping up to an 8" jointer generally gets you up to the 74" length. Here's my question. Given that many people want to joint long boards, but don't necessarily need the additional width, why don't manufacturers sell 6" jointers with really long beds? Do they basically assume that if you want the extra length you'll pay for the extra width? Is it just too hard to make a long skinny bed flat? Just curious... One tried, but got shut down before it got off the drawing board. Frank |
#6
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
why no really long-bed 6" jointers
Chris Friesen wrote:
It seems like the common bed size for a 6" jointer is about 45". You can get at least a few that are 55" (General International and King Industrial, maybe others, then the Powermatic at 66". It seems like stepping up to an 8" jointer generally gets you up to the 74" length. Here's my question. Given that many people want to joint long boards, but don't necessarily need the additional width, why don't manufacturers sell 6" jointers with really long beds? Do they basically assume that if you want the extra length you'll pay for the extra width? Is it just too hard to make a long skinny bed flat? Just curious... Chris \ Why bother? The 6" longbed would probably be just as expensive as the 8". The length is the floor space eater not the width, so no advantage there. I'd rather have the extra couple of inches. -jj -- Remove BOB to email me |
#7
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
why no really long-bed 6" jointers
"Chris Friesen" wrote in message ... It seems like the common bed size for a 6" jointer is about 45". You can get at least a few that are 55" (General International and King Industrial, maybe others, then the Powermatic at 66". Want longer? Look here http://www.grizzly.com/products/G0526 or here http://www.wmhtoolgroup.com/index.cf...il&iid=6056033 |
#8
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
why no really long-bed 6" jointers
On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 16:03:42 -0800, David wrote:
Chris Friesen wrote: It seems like the common bed size for a 6" jointer is about 45". You can get at least a few that are 55" (General International and King Industrial, maybe others, then the Powermatic at 66". It seems like stepping up to an 8" jointer generally gets you up to the 74" length. Here's my question. Given that many people want to joint long boards, but don't necessarily need the additional width, why don't manufacturers sell 6" jointers with really long beds? Do they basically assume that if you want the extra length you'll pay for the extra width? Is it just too hard to make a long skinny bed flat? Just curious... Chris not enough room to dedicate to one longer? Cost? Weight and shipping cost? difficulty keeping overly long tables from remaining perfectly parallel? to name a few... Dave As a newb to woodworking, I had read enough commentary on "go for 8" that I was determined to get an 8" but the bed length in my small shop just wouldn't work. If I could have handled the length, I would have sprung for the extra 2 inches as the 6 has forced me to rip many a wide board already just so I could joint it. Someday... Warren |
#9
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
why no really long-bed 6" jointers
There are devices, still made by Stanley and a number of others, that allow
you to joint boards any length, any width. They also hang on a shelf when not in use. "Warren" wrote in message If I could have handled the length, I would have sprung for the extra 2 inches as the 6 has forced me to rip many a wide board already just so I could joint it. Someday... Warren |
#10
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
why no really long-bed 6" jointers
CW wrote:
There are devices, still made by Stanley and a number of others, that allow you to joint boards any length, any width. They also hang on a shelf when not in use. Yep. I don't have a jointer or planer, so I recently made an end-grain cutting board (13x20x2) using a table saw and a hand plane for all my milling. Chris |
#11
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
why no really long-bed 6" jointers
"Chris Friesen" wrote in message ... It seems like the common bed size for a 6" jointer is about 45". You can get at least a few that are 55" (General International and King Industrial, maybe others, then the Powermatic at 66". It seems like stepping up to an 8" jointer generally gets you up to the 74" length. Here's my question. Given that many people want to joint long boards, but don't necessarily need the additional width, why don't manufacturers sell 6" jointers with really long beds? Do they basically assume that if you want the extra length you'll pay for the extra width? Is it just too hard to make a long skinny bed flat? Just curious... Chris There are probably a couple reasons, including a need to increase size to make the length stable, and the fact that it doesn't add much more to expense overall to use almost the same motor and 2" to the cutterhead and cutters than to just use the 6" cutterhead. You've already paid for the extra table mass. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Linux is Driving me $#@!!!! nutz!!! | Metalworking | |||
Forest for the Trees (long - duh!) | Woodworking | |||
Looking for long HICKORY flooring boards (6'-8') | Home Repair | |||
How long for brick mortar to dry? | Home Repair |