Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tightening up the mouths on both a #3 and #5 Stanley. Want the #3 at
about .020 and the #5 at about .125. In both cases the frog adjusting screw bottoms out befoe I get the mouths that tight, with just a hint of iron below the sole. So I just took the screws out and moved the frogs forward manually. That worked fine, but it would be nice to use the screws for more precise adjustment. Question 1 - Is this "too long" screw normal? I suspect it may due to the irons (both original Stanleys, ca. 1930s) being short from many honings - likely? Question 2 - I can fix it by either shimmimg under the adjustment yoke (moving it further aft) ot grinding 3 or 4 threads off the adjustment screws. Which is preferable? BTW, these are both users, not collectables, so staying original is not way up there. Thanks for any thoughts. Regards. Tom |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Banes wrote:
snip Which is preferable? BTW, these are both users, not collectables, so staying original is not way up there. If you haven't already, please read Jeff's website, especially the part on fettling before you do anything irrevocable. Dave in fairfax -- reply-to doesn't work use: daveldr at att dot net American Association of Woodturners http://www.woodturner.org Capital Area Woodturners http://www.capwoodturners.org/ PATINA http://www.patinatools.org |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 17:05:18 -0500, Tom Banes wrote:
Tightening up the mouths on both a #3 and #5 Stanley. Want the #3 at about .020 and the #5 at about .125. In both cases the frog adjusting screw bottoms out befoe I get the mouths that tight, with just a hint of iron below the sole. So I just took the screws out and moved the frogs forward manually. That worked fine, but it would be nice to use the screws for more precise adjustment. Something's not right. If you back off your chipbreaker, you'll get more blade through the mouth. The frog adjusting screw is happiest when you loosen the frog attachment bolts. It's not doing what you think it's doing, I think. Loosen the frog attachment bolts a hair, put everything back together, check the mouth opening, lather rinse repeat. When you've got it as tight as you want, tighten the bolts down. And read the link another poster mentioned. -- "Keep your ass behind you" vladimir a t mad {dot} scientist {dot} com |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 17:05:18 -0500, the opaque Tom Banes
spake: Tightening up the mouths on both a #3 and #5 Stanley. Want the #3 at about .020 and the #5 at about .125. In both cases the frog adjusting screw bottoms out befoe I get the mouths that tight, with just a hint of iron below the sole. So I just took the screws out and moved the frogs forward manually. That worked fine, but it would be nice to use the screws for more precise adjustment. Question 1 - Is this "too long" screw normal? I suspect it may due to the irons (both original Stanleys, ca. 1930s) being short from many honings - likely? Two things would normally cause something like that. First, if the plane was refinished, excess paint could build up in the frog holddown holes. Second, the excess sanding on the frog and its track could make the standard screws appear too long. You can check for the first and repair that. Question 2 - I can fix it by either shimmimg under the adjustment yoke (moving it further aft) ot grinding 3 or 4 threads off the adjustment screws. Which is preferable? BTW, these are both users, not collectables, so staying original is not way up there. THREE OR FOUR THREADS? Something's missing there or the wrong frogs are in those planes, Tom. Shimming the frog might be my choice. - This product cruelly tested on defenseless furry animals - -------------------------------------------------------- http://diversify.com Web App & Database Programming |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
After you have checked on the other things that have been posted, try a
thicker blade - that will push the frog back and give you back your range of adjustment. I put a 1/8" thick blade in my #7 and had to open the mouth to get clearance but it sure works well. Craig "Tom Banes" wrote in message ... Tightening up the mouths on both a #3 and #5 Stanley. Want the #3 at about .020 and the #5 at about .125. In both cases the frog adjusting screw bottoms out befoe I get the mouths that tight, with just a hint of iron below the sole. So I just took the screws out and moved the frogs forward manually. That worked fine, but it would be nice to use the screws for more precise adjustment. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() After you have checked on the other things that have been posted, try a thicker blade - that will push the frog back and give you back your range of adjustment. I put a 1/8" thick blade in my #7 and had to open the mouth to get clearance but it sure works well. Craig What brand of blade might I ask? -- Alex - newbie_neander in woodworking cravdraa_at-yahoo_dot-com not my site: http://www.e-sword.net/ |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks to all for the input. As usual the issue was not what it
appeared. "Screw too long or hole too short?" The latter, in this case. The adjustment screws had obviously never been fully screwed in. By taking the frog and tote off to get a clear shot at the screw, using some machine oil, and running the screw in and out multiple times (I didn't have a tap that matched the Stanlley threads), flushing with WD40, I was able to getthe screws in both planes to seat fully. The frogs adjust just fine now. 10 minutes of thinking as a result of your responses and all is well. Thanks. Tom Question 1 - Is this "too long" screw normal? I suspect it may due to the irons (both original Stanleys, ca. 1930s) being short from many honings - likely? Question 2 - I can fix it by either shimmimg under the adjustment yoke (moving it further aft) ot grinding 3 or 4 threads off the adjustment screws. Which is preferable? BTW, these are both users, not collectables, so staying original is not way up there. Thanks for any thoughts. Regards. Tom |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Stanley plane adjustment knob | Woodworking | |||
Will buying a new Stanley plane make any difference? | Woodworking | |||
Hand plane question -please help? | Woodworking | |||
this ought to get everybody fired up.... | Woodworking | |||
Next plane purchase--next 2 plane purchases? | Woodworking |