Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Woodturning (rec.crafts.woodturning) To discuss tools, techniques, styles, materials, shows and competitions, education and educational materials related to woodturning. All skill levels are welcome, from art turners to production turners, beginners to masters. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Bandsaw blade size
I've just got a bandsaw (seems to be a bit of an epidemic at the
moment!) and it came with a blade fitted as standard. I've been following the discussions here recently on blade sizes, and I'm wondering how the blade width is measured exactly, so that I can determine what I've got fitted and decide whether I want to upgrade or not. So, is it measured to the tip of the teeth, or the hollow between the teeth (I'm sure there's a 'proper' name for this) ? -- Alun Saunders |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Alun Saunders" wrote in message ... I've just got a bandsaw (seems to be a bit of an epidemic at the moment!) and it came with a blade fitted as standard. I've been following the discussions here recently on blade sizes, and I'm wondering how the blade width is measured exactly, so that I can determine what I've got fitted and decide whether I want to upgrade or not. So, is it measured to the tip of the teeth, or the hollow between the teeth (I'm sure there's a 'proper' name for this) ? -- Width tip to back, but go closest, without splitting hairs. Upgrade doesn't count in blade width, but in blade design and tooth configuration. Blade width is about the diameter circle it'll cut. Gullet(s). |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
George wrote:
Blade width is about the diameter circle it'll cut. Or, conversely, how well it will cut a straight line. Alun, have you tried the blade that came with the bandsaw and found a problem? FWI, I am very happy with the Viking 1/2" x 3tpi blade I use on my 14" Delta. It seems to work well for both straight cuts and bowl blanks of any reasonable size. -- Derek Andrews, woodturner http://www.seafoamwoodturning.com http://chipshop.blogspot.com http://groups.yahoo.com/group/toolrest/ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Derek Andrews wrote:
George wrote: Blade width is about the diameter circle it'll cut. Or, conversely, how well it will cut a straight line. Alun, have you tried the blade that came with the bandsaw and found a problem? FWI, I am very happy with the Viking 1/2" x 3tpi blade I use on my 14" Delta. It seems to work well for both straight cuts and bowl blanks of any reasonable size. I've not had any real problems, but then I've never owned, or even used a bandsaw until two days ago when I got it, so I don't really have anything to compare it with. I've managed to cut a 13" bowl blank out of a big slab of 5" thick ash, so I guess it's working OK. The only problem I have had is when crosscutting some smallish (4-5" diameter) maple logs that weren't completely cylindrical when the blade appeared to pull the log downwards in a rotating motion towards the table and then stalled, but I managed to recover from that. I measured the blade and it's a 3/8". How small a diameter circle could I realistically cut with that? And would there be any advantage to going up a size to, say, a 1/2" blade if I decided that the minimum diameter I could cut with that wouldn't be a problem? -- Alun Saunders |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Alun Saunders" wrote in message ... Derek Andrews wrote: George wrote: Blade width is about the diameter circle it'll cut. Or, conversely, how well it will cut a straight line. I measured the blade and it's a 3/8". How small a diameter circle could I realistically cut with that? And would there be any advantage to going up a size to, say, a 1/2" blade if I decided that the minimum diameter I could cut with that wouldn't be a problem? http://www.timberwolf1.com/silicon_steel_slection.asp says 2 1/2 diameter for 3/8 Good fellows to order from. Straight lines are the responsibility of the operator, the limitation on circles is posed by the blade, and is purely geometry. The greater rigidity (beam strength) of the 1/2" blade, plus the extra amount under control by the guides makes it a better candidate for larger and thicker work in my opinion. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Alun
Crosscutting a cylindrical shape is asking for the blade to grab the wood and over rotate it so as to kink the blade and scare you half to death, not to mention the possiblility of some piece of flesh being pulled into the blade. Use a large c-clamp (g-cramp to the UK folks) to hold the wood so as to keep it from rotating. The clamp is positioned so that it grips the wood and the bar of the clamp rides the table. There is a picture on my web page. -- God bless and safe turning Darrell Feltmate Truro, NS Canada www.aroundthewoods.com |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Alun The standard blades are normally for sawing dry wood with a narrow smooth kerf. The blades we need for sawing wet wood do need a wide kerf for clearance and it does not have to be a nice smooth cut. The standard idea is to have a minimum of 3 teeth in the wood you saw, so for furniture making where 1/2" and 3/4" wood is sawn regularly you need 8 or more teeth per inch (tpi). We saw thicker wood normally so a 3 or 4 tpi is best and if you have more than one speed on your saw, you can safely go to the higher speed, the more teeth going through the wood make for a faster sawing feed. The size of the saw (measured from its back to tooth point, not from the back to the gullet) is important only for the tightness of the curve you want to make, for a tight curve you need a narrow blade and a wide blade helps for making straight cuts. Also now is a good time to get a book on bands use and tuning. Have fun and take care Leo Van Der Loo Alun Saunders wrote: I've just got a bandsaw (seems to be a bit of an epidemic at the moment!) and it came with a blade fitted as standard. I've been following the discussions here recently on blade sizes, and I'm wondering how the blade width is measured exactly, so that I can determine what I've got fitted and decide whether I want to upgrade or not. So, is it measured to the tip of the teeth, or the hollow between the teeth (I'm sure there's a 'proper' name for this) ? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Leo Van Der Loo wrote:
The standard blades are normally for sawing dry wood with a narrow smooth kerf. The blades we need for sawing wet wood do need a wide kerf for clearance and it does not have to be a nice smooth cut. The standard idea is to have a minimum of 3 teeth in the wood you saw, so for furniture making where 1/2" and 3/4" wood is sawn regularly you need 8 or more teeth per inch (tpi). We saw thicker wood normally so a 3 or 4 tpi is best and if you have more than one speed on your saw, you can safely go to the higher speed, the more teeth going through the wood make for a faster sawing feed. The size of the saw (measured from its back to tooth point, not from the back to the gullet) is important only for the tightness of the curve you want to make, for a tight curve you need a narrow blade and a wide blade helps for making straight cuts. Also now is a good time to get a book on bands use and tuning. I've measured the standard saw blade that came with the saw, and it appears to be a 3/8" 3tpi blade, so I'm OK there it seems. Regarding the speed, it is a dual speed saw, a Record Power BS300, and according to the manual ... "The BS300 has two blade speeds 360 m/min (1190 feet/ min) for hardwoods, some plastics and certain non ferrous metals and 780 m/min (2580 feet/min) for all other timber." I figured that since most of the wood I would be cutting would qualify as "hardwood" I'd use the slower setting, but are you saying I should be using the higher setting? -- Alun Saunders |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Alun
If you have enough power, yes use the higher speed for wet thick wood. Have fun and take care Leo Van Der Loo Alun Saunders wrote: I've measured the standard saw blade that came with the saw, and it appears to be a 3/8" 3tpi blade, so I'm OK there it seems. Regarding the speed, it is a dual speed saw, a Record Power BS300, and according to the manual ... "The BS300 has two blade speeds 360 m/min (1190 feet/ min) for hardwoods, some plastics and certain non ferrous metals and 780 m/min (2580 feet/min) for all other timber." I figured that since most of the wood I would be cutting would qualify as "hardwood" I'd use the slower setting, but are you saying I should be using the higher setting? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Leo Van Der Loo wrote:
If you have enough power, yes use the higher speed for wet thick wood. It's a 1.25hp motor apparently. -- Alun Saunders |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Kink in 4x6 bandsaw blade | Metalworking | |||
Various bandsaw questions...long | Woodworking | |||
Delta 14" bandsaw blade alignment madness | Woodworking | |||
Tuning a Bandsaw | Metalworking | |||
Bowl Saving: A Comprehensive Discussion | Woodturning |