On Sat, 29 May 2021 20:47:11 +0100, Fredxx, the notorious, troll-feeding,
senile smartass, blathered again:


Are you so myopic and thick you don't recognise a fanatic peddling lies?

No, he's trolling and baiting for attention, troll-feeding senile asshole!

But are YOU so eager to display what a smart ass you are that you thankfully
keep taking every single bait he sets out for you ridiculous senile
smartass? LOL

On Sat, 29 May 2021 20:51:55 +0100, Fredxx, the notorious, troll-feeding,
senile smartass, blathered again:



You are a vegetarian, so you also pander to the killing of animals,
albeit indirectly.

HE is a clinically insane sociopath, ****** and troll! YOU are a
troll-feeding miserable senile smartass who just likes smartassing, even if
it's only for a troll! LOL

On Sat, 29 May 2021 20:59:58 +0100, Fredxx, the notorious, troll-feeding,
senile smartass, blathered again:


It's not "not allowed" it's "decided not to".

No, his family has decided to go vegan. Clearly he has an impulse to eat
meat when passing establishments like kebab shops.

WTF has your senile **** got to do with the three ngs you keep crossposting
it to, senile smartass?

On Sat, 29 May 2021 21:02:58 +0100, Fredxx, the notorious, troll-feeding,
senile smartass, blathered again:


Again, that may be so, but the jury's out on that one. I would have
thought you would be open minded to the possibility it did indeed come
from a wet market rather than being of a closed mind and myopic in nature.

LOL The resident senile smartass "struck" again!

On Sat, 29 May 2021 19:22:44 +0100, "Commander Kinsey"
wrote:

On Sat, 29 May 2021 08:58:41 +0100, Spike wrote:

On 28/05/2021 20:33, Fredxx wrote:
On 28/05/2021 20:07, T i m wrote:
"Commander Kinsey" wrote:

No, the main point is injecting animals which we eat with antibiotics makes *something* antibiotic resistant.

Quite.

That you jumped on him saying virus instead of bacteria is childish.

And not only the once and not only that particular troll.

So anyone corrects your lies is now a troll.

Assuming T i m can count, perhaps he should revisit his posts on the
subject, and see how many times he repeated "eating meat causes
antibiotic resistance n viruses" *after* having his 'mistake' corrected.

But he won't of course, he'll continue to cover his error by hurling abuse.

Are you really so thick you can't see the point he was making?

Ooooh, oooooh, I can answer that with an emphatic and unequivocal
*YES!!*

Not because he is actually thick as such, just not bright enough to
realise how much he is showing everyone (well, those who don't have
him killfiled etc) just how much of a troll so left brainer he is (Not
all left brainers are trolls of course, just the lack of empathy and
no understanding of 'self' (self respect) mean they typically are).

Hint, the word virus was nothing to do with it.

Quite, just that *FACT* isn't of interest to the Trolls, too busy
making up all sorts of BS and FUD as they dig their holes ever deeper
....

Cheers, T i m

On Sat, 29 May 2021 22:31:01 +0100, D i m, the absolutely brain dead
notorious troll-feeding senile asshole, blathered, yet again:

Ooooh, oooooh, I can answer that with an emphatic and unequivocal
*YES!!*

Did he come in your mouth finally, D i m?

On Sat, 29 May 2021 19:21:27 +0100, "Commander Kinsey"
wrote:

snip

You know, the mother deer 'looking after their young' ...

I should have checked for a tag to identify the owner of the deer that caused £60 of damage to my car!

So, a deer ran into your stationary car and did that sort of damage
did it? ;-)

Same sort of problem as people who decimate an area that has been
walked by the likes of elephants for thousands of years then they
wonder why the elephants are walking though their crops?

Cheers, T i m

On Sat, 29 May 2021 23:15:30 +0100, D i m, the absolutely brain dead
notorious troll-feeding senile asshole, blathered, yet again:



Cheers, D i m

All your idiotic senile **** FLUSHED, troll-feeding senile C R E T I N! BG

On Sat, 29 May 2021 23:20:24 +0100, D i m, the absolutely brain dead
notorious troll-feeding senile asshole, blathered, yet again:



Cheers, D i m

WTF has all your sick senile **** got to do with uk.d-i-y, D i m, you
disgusting senile C R E T I N?

On 29/05/2021 22:31, T i m wrote:
On Sat, 29 May 2021 19:22:44 +0100, "Commander Kinsey"
wrote:

On Sat, 29 May 2021 08:58:41 +0100, Spike wrote:

On 28/05/2021 20:33, Fredxx wrote:
On 28/05/2021 20:07, T i m wrote:
"Commander Kinsey" wrote:

No, the main point is injecting animals which we eat with antibiotics makes *something* antibiotic resistant.

Quite.

That you jumped on him saying virus instead of bacteria is childish.

And not only the once and not only that particular troll.

So anyone corrects your lies is now a troll.

Assuming T i m can count, perhaps he should revisit his posts on the
subject, and see how many times he repeated "eating meat causes
antibiotic resistance n viruses" *after* having his 'mistake' corrected.

But he won't of course, he'll continue to cover his error by hurling abuse.

Are you really so thick you can't see the point he was making?

Ooooh, oooooh, I can answer that with an emphatic and unequivocal
*YES!!*

Not because he is actually thick as such, just not bright enough to
realise how much he is showing everyone (well, those who don't have
him killfiled etc) just how much of a troll so left brainer he is (Not
all left brainers are trolls of course, just the lack of empathy and
no understanding of 'self' (self respect) mean they typically are).

Abuse, the final response of a lost argument.

Hint, the word virus was nothing to do with it.

Quite, just that *FACT* isn't of interest to the Trolls, too busy
making up all sorts of BS and FUD as they dig their holes ever deeper

When you stop spouting nonsense like, "eating meat makes viruses
antibiotic resistant" we will have come a long way.

On 29/05/2021 21:31, T i m wrote:
"Commander Kinsey" wrote:
On Sat, 29 May 2021 08:58:41 +0100, Spike wrote:

Assuming T i m can count, perhaps he should revisit his posts on the
subject, and see how many times he repeated "eating meat causes
antibiotic resistance in viruses" *after* having his 'mistake' corrected.

But he won't of course, he'll continue to cover his error by hurling abuse.

Are you really so thick you can't see the point he was making?

Ooooh, oooooh, I can answer that with an emphatic and unequivocal
*YES!!*

The point you were making was "eating meat causes antibiotic resistance
in viruses", which is a plain and simple statement which of course
supports your anti-meat stance that hides under a cloak of imposed
veganism. Exaggeration for effect is the spirit of your posts on the
subject.

Not because he is actually thick as such, just not bright enough to
realise how much he is showing everyone (well, those who don't have
him killfiled etc) just how much of a troll so left brainer he is (Not
all left brainers are trolls of course, just the lack of empathy and
no understanding of 'self' (self respect) mean they typically are).

Ah! The 'left-brainer' jibe - a sure sign that T i m has lost the
argument yet again.

Hint, the word virus was nothing to do with it.

The word 'virus' was central to his argument...

Quite, just that *FACT* isn't of interest to the Trolls, too busy
making up all sorts of BS and FUD as they dig their holes ever deeper

I take it you now have finally discovered that eating meat does not
cause antibiotic resistance in viruses. If so, at least you have made a
little progress. Not much, though, it has to be said.

How's things in the spirit worlds?

--
Spike

On 29/05/2021 22:15, T i m wrote:

Dogs are omnivores and in spite of any denial by the trolls, meat is
not some 'miracle food' and can be easily replaced with other
foods and supplements.

Somewhere on the South Coast this week a pregnant cow fell from a cliff
to her death, after being chased by a dog or dogs. She did really well
defending herself, didn't she, like you claim so often that cows can
defend themselves and their young. I'll remind you of this next time you
bring up the topic.

Have you ever asked yourself why life doesn't match up to your
perception of it?

--
Spike

On 29/05/2021 19:21, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Thu, 27 May 2021 23:44:47 +0100, T i m wrote:

On Tue, 25 May 2021 19:00:34 +0100, "Commander Kinsey"
wrote:

snip

Not really, I just thought I'd use his 'no natural predators' claim to
counter T i m ' s 'look after their young' claim.

snip

I got a deer, does that count?

Funnily ... there was a thing on TV the other day where a 'gamekeeper'
was ear tagging young deer in Richmond Park (I think). He would creep
up to the deer laying in the long grass and punch a hole though it's
ear and add a tag and 'hope' it didn't bleat (from the pain in it's
ear probably?) because if that called attention to the plight of the
young deer to it's mum, the mums would likely come across and defend
it by attacking him.

You know, the mother deer 'looking after their young' ...

I should have checked for a tag to identify the owner of the deer that
caused £60 of damage to my car!

I don't believe you. anyone round here who has had a 'deer cause damage
to their car', has written it off and often ended up in hospital.


--
€œI know that most men, including those at ease with problems of the
greatest complexity, can seldom accept even the simplest and most
obvious truth if it be such as would oblige them to admit the falsity of
conclusions which they have delighted in explaining to colleagues, which
they have proudly taught to others, and which they have woven, thread by
thread, into the fabric of their lives.€�

ۥ Leo Tolstoy

On Sun, 30 May 2021 09:57:14 +0100, The Natural Idiot, the notorious,
troll-feeding senile asshole, blathered again:


I don't believe you.

Could it have to do with him being a trolling attention whore and you being
a typical miserable senile asshole who will feed the trolling attention
whore anyway? BG

On 26/5/21 4:09 am, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Mon, 24 May 2021 21:58:40 +0100, Fredxx wrote:

On 24/05/2021 20:35, Commander Kinsey wrote:
https://youtu.be/klm5dD1FdmM

Is this why you are still single?

That's not me in the video.

It looks like you - the one with the slightly larger ears and the
quizzical look!

--

Xeno


Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

On Sun, 30 May 2021 20:19:03 +1000, Xeno, another brainless, troll-feeding,
senile Australian idiot, blathered:


Is this why you are still single?

That's not me in the video.

It looks like you - the one with the slightly larger ears and the
quizzical look!

Wow, the sociopathic troll's idiotic "thread" is still going strong! Well,
done, you senile assholes of the world!

On Sun, 30 May 2021 09:57:14 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:

snip

I should have checked for a tag to identify the owner of the deer that
caused £60 of damage to my car!

I don't believe you.

I wonder why. Pre-conceived 'understanding' of everything?

anyone round here who has had a 'deer cause damage
to their car', has written it off and often ended up in hospital.

Ah, it must be just because it's 'round there' then.

When daughters BF hit a deer that ran across the road in front of them
it broke the headlamp and number plate, no one went to hospital and
the parts were no more than £50. The chances are it didn't happen
'round there' though.

Cheers, T i m

On 30/05/2021 11:29, T i m wrote:
The Natural Philosopher wrote:

I should have checked for a tag to identify the owner of the deer that
caused �60 of damage to my car!

I don't believe you.

I wonder why. Pre-conceived 'understanding' of everything?

anyone round here who has had a 'deer cause damage
to their car', has written it off and often ended up in hospital.

Ah, it must be just because it's 'round there' then.

When daughters BF hit a deer that ran across the road in front of them
it broke the headlamp and number plate, no one went to hospital and
the parts were no more than �50. The chances are it didn't happen
'round there' though.

So, you *do* understand the technique of exaggerating for effect, as
you've just accused TNP of it. All you now need to do is recognise when
you're using it to others to further your anti-meat-eating cause
disguised as veganism.


--
Spike

On 30/05/2021 13:03, Spike wrote:
On 30/05/2021 11:29, T i m wrote:
The Natural Philosopher wrote:

I should have checked for a tag to identify the owner of the deer that
caused �60 of damage to my car!

I don't believe you.

I wonder why. Pre-conceived 'understanding' of everything?

anyone round here who has had a 'deer cause damage
to their car', has written it off and often ended up in hospital.

Ah, it must be just because it's 'round there' then.

When daughters BF hit a deer that ran across the road in front of them
it broke the headlamp and number plate, no one went to hospital and
the parts were no more than �50. The chances are it didn't happen
'round there' though.

So, you *do* understand the technique of exaggerating for effect, as
you've just accused TNP of it. All you now need to do is recognise when
you're using it to others to further your anti-meat-eating cause
disguised as veganism.


Two cases I know of. One utterly destroyed the car, the other did that
*and* it ended up after rolling 50 yards in a field with the occupant
with a broken shoulder and arm. Both were at 50mph speeds which is
normal 'round here' for roads that you can see for miles ahead on - but
not over the hedges and into the trees that line it.

Its rare, but when it happens the damage is usually severe.

Obviously a townie crawling along at 15mph in suburbia would not
experience the same damage

--
€œwhen things get difficult you just have to lie€�

€• Jean Claud Jüncker

On Sat, 29 May 2021 23:20:24 +0100, T i m wrote:

On Sat, 29 May 2021 19:21:27 +0100, "Commander Kinsey"
wrote:

snip

You know, the mother deer 'looking after their young' ...

I should have checked for a tag to identify the owner of the deer that caused £60 of damage to my car!

So, a deer ran into your stationary car and did that sort of damage
did it? ;-)

No, I was going 90. It didn't look before crossing, it was preoccupied with the female deers which had run across beforehand.

Same sort of problem as people who decimate an area that has been
walked by the likes of elephants for thousands of years then they
wonder why the elephants are walking though their crops?

There's a ****ing sign there to tell the deers where to cross!

On Sun, 30 May 2021 13:17:32 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

On 30/05/2021 13:03, Spike wrote:
On 30/05/2021 11:29, T i m wrote:
The Natural Philosopher wrote:

I should have checked for a tag to identify the owner of the deer that
caused �60 of damage to my car!

I don't believe you.

I wonder why. Pre-conceived 'understanding' of everything?

anyone round here who has had a 'deer cause damage
to their car', has written it off and often ended up in hospital.

Ah, it must be just because it's 'round there' then.

When daughters BF hit a deer that ran across the road in front of them
it broke the headlamp and number plate, no one went to hospital and
the parts were no more than �50. The chances are it didn't happen
'round there' though.

So, you *do* understand the technique of exaggerating for effect, as
you've just accused TNP of it. All you now need to do is recognise when
you're using it to others to further your anti-meat-eating cause
disguised as veganism.


Two cases I know of. One utterly destroyed the car, the other did that
*and* it ended up after rolling 50 yards in a field with the occupant
with a broken shoulder and arm. Both were at 50mph speeds which is
normal 'round here' for roads that you can see for miles ahead on - but
not over the hedges and into the trees that line it.

Its rare, but when it happens the damage is usually severe.

Obviously a townie crawling along at 15mph in suburbia would not
experience the same damage

90mph VW Golf, about 1000kg. 0mph deer (in the direction of the collision, as it was crossing the road at 90 degrees), about 100kg. Consider the conservation of momentum, and the crumple zones of cars, then explain why you're utterly wrong. You might also like to consider the shape of the front of the car, and that the deer was catapulted up in the air (it hit the canoe on the roof which then split it in half). Here's the damage caused: https://i.imgur.com/pETDt1J.jpg - I lost the VW badge!

On Sun, 30 May 2021 11:19:03 +0100, Xeno wrote:

On 26/5/21 4:09 am, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Mon, 24 May 2021 21:58:40 +0100, Fredxx wrote:

On 24/05/2021 20:35, Commander Kinsey wrote:
https://youtu.be/klm5dD1FdmM

Is this why you are still single?

That's not me in the video.

It looks like you - the one with the slightly larger ears and the
quizzical look!

I have testicles.

On Sat, 29 May 2021 19:54:07 +0100, Snit wrote:

On May 29, 2021 at 11:18:19 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

I don't burp at them, but I do /talk/ to them - and, sometimes, I sing!

Here's an example - https://ibb.co/4W8qzyZ

That's just an image -- but what is important is that they herd.

Groan.... don't give up the day job.

Ha! =F0=9F=98=83

Is there a place I can tell Dad jokes for a living?

It's best to sit where Dad can hear you. I doubt he'd pay you much though.

You made a funny!

I didn't need to, you wrote it for me. Your sentence was ambiguous and I understood it incorrectly.

On Sat, 29 May 2021 23:49:52 +0100, Fredxx wrote:

On 29/05/2021 22:31, T i m wrote:
On Sat, 29 May 2021 19:22:44 +0100, "Commander Kinsey"
wrote:

On Sat, 29 May 2021 08:58:41 +0100, Spike wrote:

On 28/05/2021 20:33, Fredxx wrote:
On 28/05/2021 20:07, T i m wrote:
"Commander Kinsey" wrote:

No, the main point is injecting animals which we eat with antibiotics makes *something* antibiotic resistant.

Quite.

That you jumped on him saying virus instead of bacteria is childish.

And not only the once and not only that particular troll.

So anyone corrects your lies is now a troll.

Assuming T i m can count, perhaps he should revisit his posts on the
subject, and see how many times he repeated "eating meat causes
antibiotic resistance n viruses" *after* having his 'mistake' corrected.

But he won't of course, he'll continue to cover his error by hurling abuse.

Are you really so thick you can't see the point he was making?

Ooooh, oooooh, I can answer that with an emphatic and unequivocal
*YES!!*

Not because he is actually thick as such, just not bright enough to
realise how much he is showing everyone (well, those who don't have
him killfiled etc) just how much of a troll so left brainer he is (Not
all left brainers are trolls of course, just the lack of empathy and
no understanding of 'self' (self respect) mean they typically are).

Abuse, the final response of a lost argument.

Abuse is what you lot did when picking up on him using the wrong word. You couldn't be bothered discussing the actual argument, instead you chose to analyse tiny irrelevant mistakes.

Hint, the word virus was nothing to do with it.

Quite, just that *FACT* isn't of interest to the Trolls, too busy
making up all sorts of BS and FUD as they dig their holes ever deeper

When you stop spouting nonsense like, "eating meat makes viruses
antibiotic resistant" we will have come a long way.

When you learn to substitute a word to find the real meaning, and manage to continue the discussion about antibiotics, we'll have come a long way.

On Sun, 30 May 2021 09:30:09 +0100, Spike wrote:

On 29/05/2021 21:31, T i m wrote:
"Commander Kinsey" wrote:
On Sat, 29 May 2021 08:58:41 +0100, Spike wrote:

Assuming T i m can count, perhaps he should revisit his posts on the
subject, and see how many times he repeated "eating meat causes
antibiotic resistance in viruses" *after* having his 'mistake' corrected.

But he won't of course, he'll continue to cover his error by hurling abuse.

Are you really so thick you can't see the point he was making?

Ooooh, oooooh, I can answer that with an emphatic and unequivocal
*YES!!*

The point you were making was "eating meat causes antibiotic resistance
in viruses", which is a plain and simple statement which of course
supports your anti-meat stance that hides under a cloak of imposed
veganism. Exaggeration for effect is the spirit of your posts on the
subject.

Not because he is actually thick as such, just not bright enough to
realise how much he is showing everyone (well, those who don't have
him killfiled etc) just how much of a troll so left brainer he is (Not
all left brainers are trolls of course, just the lack of empathy and
no understanding of 'self' (self respect) mean they typically are).

Ah! The 'left-brainer' jibe - a sure sign that T i m has lost the
argument yet again.

Hint, the word virus was nothing to do with it.

The word 'virus' was central to his argument...

Quite, just that *FACT* isn't of interest to the Trolls, too busy
making up all sorts of BS and FUD as they dig their holes ever deeper

I take it you now have finally discovered that eating meat does not
cause antibiotic resistance in viruses. If so, at least you have made a
little progress. Not much, though, it has to be said.

So, does it cause antibiotic resistance in anything else? You'll get there eventually.

You're expectation of precision in usenet posts is a clear sign of OCD. There's no point in the humans in here arguing with OCD morons. Get help.

On Mon, 31 May 2021 03:48:04 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
blather

--
Typical retarded "conversation" between the Scottish ****** and the senile
Ozzietard:

Birdbrain: "Horse **** doesn't stink."

Senile Rodent: "It does if you roll in it."

Birdbrain: "I've never worked out why, I assumed it was maybe meateaters
that made stinky ****, but then why does vegetarian human **** stink? Is it
just the fact that we're capable of digesting meat?"

Senile Rodent: "Nope, some cow **** stinks too."

Message-ID:

On Mon, 31 May 2021 03:17:04 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
blather

--
Another typical retarded "conversation" between Birdbrain and senile Rodent:

Senile Rodent: " Did you ever dig a hole to bury your own ****?"

Birdbrain: "I do if there's no flush toilet around."

Senile Rodent: "Yeah, I prefer camping like that, off by myself with
no dunnys around and have always buried the ****."

MID:

On Sun, 30 May 2021 18:08:08 +0100, "Commander Kinsey"
wrote:

On Sat, 29 May 2021 23:20:24 +0100, T i m wrote:

On Sat, 29 May 2021 19:21:27 +0100, "Commander Kinsey"
wrote:

snip

You know, the mother deer 'looking after their young' ...

I should have checked for a tag to identify the owner of the deer that caused £60 of damage to my car!

So, a deer ran into your stationary car and did that sort of damage
did it? ;-)

No, I was going 90.

Kph I hope.

It didn't look before crossing,

Why would it, not many predators can do that sort of speed.

it was preoccupied with the female deers which had run across beforehand.

You can't blame him for that then. ;-)

Same sort of problem as people who decimate an area that has been
walked by the likes of elephants for thousands of years then they
wonder why the elephants are walking though their crops?

There's a ****ing sign there to tell the deers where to cross!

And it's written in it's language is it, in these days of inclusion?

Cheers, T i m

On Sun, 30 May 2021 18:22:19 +0100, "Commander Kinsey"
wrote:
snip

but I killed your neighbour slowly in a vat of hot water,

Did you know a lobster can live to around 100 years and there is some
suggestion that they don't 'pass out' when plunged into boiling water
but die a slow and painful death?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-42647341

I've *never* eaten lobster.

I'd get a pretty similar sentence for both. But the third guy, I boiled him for a short while then let him out with some burns which healed up. That would be considerably less of a sentence. Torture = bad, death = a million times worse. So the sentences should be 1, 1000000, and 1000001 units of jail time.

Yup, many actions we apply to animals (live stock) would be
imprisonable if not done by 'a professional.

https://ibb.co/2M7spLd

https://ibb.co/JmYzpVz

Cheers, T i m

On Sun, 30 May 2021 19:22:14 +0100, D i m, the absolutely brain dead
notorious troll-feeding senile asshole, blathered, yet again:


Did you know a lobster can live

Do you actually KNOW that you are a troll-feeding piece of senile ****, D i m? BG

On Sun, 30 May 2021 19:58:11 +0100, D i m, the absolutely brain dead
notorious troll-feeding senile asshole, blathered, yet again:


Ah. ;-(

Did he come in your troll-feeding senile gob again, senile sucker of troll
cock? G

On Sun, 30 May 2021 19:04:49 +0100, D i m, the absolutely brain dead
notorious troll-feeding senile asshole, blathered, yet again:



Kph I hope.

Choking on his cock again, D i m, you abnormal greedy senile sucker of troll
cock? G

On 30/05/2021 18:26, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sun, 30 May 2021 09:30:09 +0100, Spike wrote:

On 29/05/2021 21:31, T i m wrote:
"Commander Kinsey" wrote:
On Sat, 29 May 2021 08:58:41 +0100, Spike
wrote:

Assuming T i m can count, perhaps he should revisit his posts on the
subject, and see how many times he repeated "eating meat causes
antibiotic resistance in viruses" *after* having his 'mistake'
corrected.

But he won't of course, he'll continue to cover his error by
hurling abuse.

Are you really so thick you can't see the point he was making?

Ooooh, oooooh, I can answer that with an emphatic and unequivocal
*YES!!*

The point you were making was "eating meat causes antibiotic resistance
in viruses", which is a plain and simple statement which of course
supports your anti-meat stance that hides under a cloak of imposed
veganism. Exaggeration for effect is the spirit of your posts on the
subject.

Not because he is actually thick as such, just not bright enough to
realise how much he is showing everyone (well, those who don't have
him killfiled etc) just how much of a troll so left brainer he is (Not
all left brainers are trolls of course, just the lack of empathy and
no understanding of 'self' (self respect) mean they typically are).

Ah! The 'left-brainer' jibe - a sure sign that T i m has lost the
argument yet again.

Hint, the word virus was nothing to do with it.

The word 'virus' was central to his argument...

Quite, just that *FACT* isn't of interest to the Trolls, too busy
making up all sorts of BS and FUD as they dig their holes ever deeper

I take it you now have finally discovered that eating meat does not
cause antibiotic resistance in viruses. If so, at least you have made a
little progress. Not much, though, it has to be said.

So, does it cause antibiotic resistance in anything else?* You'll get
there eventually.

The jury is out on that one.

You're expectation of precision in usenet posts is a clear sign of OCD.
There's no point in the humans in here arguing with OCD morons.* Get help.

You're posts don't exactly show someone of intelligence. Are you even
capable of doing an honest day's work?

On Mon, 31 May 2021 01:46:45 +0100, Fredxx, the notorious, troll-feeding,
senile smartass, blathered again:


You're expectation of precision in usenet posts is a clear sign of OCD.
There's no point in the humans in here arguing with OCD morons.* Get help.

You're posts don't exactly show someone of intelligence. Are you even
capable of doing an honest day's work?

Please note, senile smartass: it is HIM who keeps baiting YOU and you are
dumb enough to take every single one of his idiotic baits! IOW, you are even
dumber than him! BG

On 30/05/2021 18:58, T i m wrote:

Please don't be drawn into the sickos mirroring. I have only ever
questioned the illogic of both teaching children to respect and care
for animals and then feeding them the dismembered remains of animals.
I offer links to documentary and educational videos on Youtube (of all
places) and the pathetic pussy trolls won't watch is and so have no
idea what it actually contains.

When you were earlier on urging people to watch your choice of videos of
animals being slaughtered in the name of 'education', I told you that
when I was very young I had seen our chickens killed, bled, plucked,
cleaned, dressed, cooked and served. Your response to that was to say
that I had been 'conditioned'. But here you are urging the same thing on
children. This is, if course, pure hypocrisy on your part as you seek to
'condition' them to accept your beliefs. Anything depths may be plumbed,
in fact, to further your anti-meat-eating crusade thinly disguised under
a cloak of the veganism you were brow-beaten in to.

--
Spike

On 30/05/2021 19:22, T i m wrote:
On Sun, 30 May 2021 18:22:19 +0100, "Commander Kinsey"
wrote: snip

but I killed your neighbour slowly in a vat of hot water,

Did you know a lobster can live to around 100 years and there is
some suggestion that they don't 'pass out' when plunged into boiling
water but die a slow and painful death?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-42647341

I've *never* eaten lobster.

I think it's overrated.

I'd get a pretty similar sentence for both. But the third guy, I
boiled him for a short while then let him out with some burns which
healed up. That would be considerably less of a sentence. Torture
= bad, death = a million times worse. So the sentences should be
1, 1000000, and 1000001 units of jail time.

Yup, many actions we apply to animals (live stock) would be
imprisonable if not done by 'a professional.

And it's disgusting that you condone the acts of cruelty,like hanging an
animal by it's legs, alive whilst being bled out.

On Sat, 29 May 2021 21:02:58 +0100, Fredxx wrote:

On 29/05/2021 19:12, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Thu, 27 May 2021 09:51:01 +0100, Spike wrote:

On 26/05/2021 20:25, T i m wrote:
"Rod Speed" wrote:

Whereas you claim, "eating meat makes viruses antibiotic resistant",
which is just as valid as your other claims.

It's common knowledge. Here, will you believe the World Health
Organisation?

https://www.who.int/news/item/07-11-...tic-resistance


That says nothing about VIRUSES.

Rod, all this is simply the trolls trying to make something out of
nothing because *nothing* is all they have.

I 'happened' to use the word viruses (because the word was in my mind
with the pandemic) incorrectly, but the likes of ****Headxx has then
latched onto that *mistake* and tried to turn it into an arguing
point.

That's total claptrap.

You came out with your 'eating meat causes antibiotic resistance in
virus' claims, and carried on repeating them in the teeth of the facts
that you were repeatedly told.

You then back-pedalled as fast as you could, and are now shifting your
grounds by claiming it was a 'mistake', which of course is yet another
back-pedal.

None of that has any credibility, and is laughable, so you then resort
to....

The spirit of my point.

Which is your third back-pedal on the subject.

Have you ever thought of researching your topic-de-jour, or do you
blindly believe the vegan **** that you lap up so carelessly?

If you go back and change virus to bacteria in his post, you can read
what he meant. Do you have an answer to that fact?

Yes, he's ignorant of the facts.

The point he was making was whether something becomes immune to overuse of antibiotics. What that something is that becomes immune is irrelevant. Your OCD is preventing you from focusing on the topic in hand.

Heavens above, you probably still believe that covid sprang from a
wet-market.

Well that is daft, we all know it came from a lab.

Again, that may be so, but the jury's out on that one. I would have
thought you would be open minded to the possibility it did indeed come
from a wet market rather than being of a closed mind and myopic in nature.

I've seen the articles, I know they were studying it.

On Sun, 30 May 2021 09:30:45 +0100, Spike wrote:

On 29/05/2021 22:15, T i m wrote:

Dogs are omnivores and in spite of any denial by the trolls, meat is
not some 'miracle food' and can be easily replaced with other
foods and supplements.

Somewhere on the South Coast this week a pregnant cow fell from a cliff
to her death, after being chased by a dog or dogs. She did really well
defending herself, didn't she, like you claim so often that cows can
defend themselves and their young. I'll remind you of this next time you
bring up the topic.

Have you ever asked yourself why life doesn't match up to your
perception of it?

You can defend yourself too, but not if the enemy is bigger, more in numbers, faster, wielding an axe, etc.

On Sat, 29 May 2021 20:47:11 +0100, Fredxx wrote:

On 29/05/2021 19:22, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sat, 29 May 2021 08:58:41 +0100, Spike wrote:

On 28/05/2021 20:33, Fredxx wrote:
On 28/05/2021 20:07, T i m wrote:
"Commander Kinsey" wrote:

No, the main point is injecting animals which we eat with
antibiotics makes *something* antibiotic resistant.

Quite.

That you jumped on him saying virus instead of bacteria is childish.

And not only the once and not only that particular troll.

So anyone corrects your lies is now a troll.

Assuming T i m can count, perhaps he should revisit his posts on the
subject, and see how many times he repeated "eating meat causes
antibiotic resistance n viruses" *after* having his 'mistake' corrected.

But he won't of course, he'll continue to cover his error by hurling
abuse.

Are you really so thick you can't see the point he was making? Hint,
the word virus was nothing to do with it.

Are you so myopic and thick you don't recognise a fanatic peddling lies?

Of course I know the point he was attempting to make.

So why call him out on something irrelevant?

Most studies say the claim is fallacious,

It's obvious it's true. We all know things build up a resistance. Why do you think doctors don't hand out antibiotics as much as they used to? They're running out of ones that are still effective.

On Sun, 30 May 2021 18:25:07 +0100, "Commander Kinsey"
wrote:

snip
Not because he is actually thick as such, just not bright enough to
realise how much he is showing everyone (well, those who don't have
him killfiled etc) just how much of a troll so left brainer he is (Not
all left brainers are trolls of course, just the lack of empathy and
no understanding of 'self' (self respect) mean they typically are).

Abuse, the final response of a lost argument.

Abuse is what you lot did when picking up on him using the wrong word.

Of course, except they will never admit to that therefore see, let
alone accept it. And why would they, how would them admitting they are
LBD and unable to deal with such thing like others / reasonable people
going to help their stance.

Further, it's like wrestling a pig, you both get covered in **** but
they enjoy it. For the same reason (LBD), they have no understanding
of 'self' and so no 'self respect', something that would stop normal
people making stuff up and repeating it as fact. But it's not
surprising these particular trolls do it, they have *nothing* else.
;-(

You couldn't be bothered discussing the actual argument, instead you chose to analyse tiny irrelevant mistakes.

Not irrelevant to *them* because they think they can score points from
it. ITRW it just confirms how pathetic and childish they really are.

Hint, the word virus was nothing to do with it.

Quite, just that *FACT* isn't of interest to the Trolls, too busy
making up all sorts of BS and FUD as they dig their holes ever deeper

When you stop spouting nonsense like, "eating meat makes viruses
antibiotic resistant" we will have come a long way.

When you learn to substitute a word to find the real meaning, and manage to continue the discussion about antibiotics, we'll have come a long way.

Won't happen. One of the issues with being *that* LeftBrainDominant is
a complete inability to *unlock* some information when you believe it
to be true / relevant / correct. 'Normal people' are just talking
heads to them, a noise to be ignored and the only people they listen
to are those who happen to share the same POV as them. Anyone holding
a contradictory POV to them is the enemy. There is no discussion
because discussion requires skills they simply don't have, like
empathy. That's why they are petrified of me, them having the self
appointed 'duty' to 'correct' everything *they think* isn't true (even
when in most cases it is true) when I am happy to let them spout their
lies and BS knowing only they believe it.

So they are insignificant to me and (of course) knowing what I think
of them makes them even worse, 'how dare I have to audacity to ignore
them' etc. ;-)

If they had anything like a valid case, they would use it and wouldn't
need to resort to lies and bull**** (like suggesting I 'want' to eat
meat when the thought of it makes me feel sick. However, *IF* I wanted
to eat meat there is no one that would try or be able to stop me
(especially given I do all the shopping [1] and cooking)).

Bottom line, no matter how they try to deny it and lie otherwise,
every vegan is causing less harm to the animals (live stock and
wildlife) and the environment than any meat eater and most sensible
meat eaters accept that and either don't care, or don't care enough to
do anything about it.

Cheers, T i m

[1] I picked up something in Iceland the other day that I thought was
vegan but was vegetarian (it contained milk) so gave it to the guy
next door.