Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#3
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 20/04/2021 10:33, Tricky Dicky wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 April 2021 at 09:57:41 UTC+1, JohnP wrote: Pet hate is the back box for sockets and switches. The way of cramming in the cables is crude. Especially as if you change a fitting the termianls can be in a different configuration. I would like to suggest - for your views! The circuit cables attached to a terminal block that is a part of the back box. The switch or socket would be connected to that block with a fly lead that would be an integral part of that switch / socket with a Wago type connector. Any sympathy for this idea? I cannot see that coming but there is potential for Wago type connectors on double sockets. I have seen a video of someone who mocked up one just as a demonstration. Light switches, single sockets and other 1-gang accessories could be problematic to fit in existing back boxes and that is where the real problem is in backward compatibility. Richard One common issue I do see is the copper wire deforming in a ductile manner under the screw, which is a form of stress relaxation The wires are no longer under the same level of compression at the time of installation, so that would be one benefit of using wago style terminals in place of the screws. Heck, the same idea could be applied to RCBOs/MCBs current carrying capacity permitted on the output terminals. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|