Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Lighting Incompatibility?
On 22/12/2020 23:40, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 19:29:23 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: red leds were always a volt and a bit, orange yellow a bit more and green and blue even more https://www.circuitbread.com/ee-faq/...different-leds Ok, I'll have to read that item later due to shortage of time right now, but I'm harking back over 40 years to the first generation of LEDs which were used for panel illumination on electronic instruments. They'd typically draw about 15mA before going phut and were dimmer than the filament bulbs they were replacing. That's if my memory is not letting me down, that is. Golly. They were up around 100mA by the 80s. -- A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes. |
#42
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Lighting Incompatibility?
On Wed, 23 Dec 2020 10:27:48 +0000 (GMT), charles
wrote: In article , Cursitor Doom wrote: On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 19:29:23 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: red leds were always a volt and a bit, orange yellow a bit more and green and blue even more https://www.circuitbread.com/ee-faq/...different-leds Ok, I'll have to read that item later due to shortage of time right now, but I'm harking back over 40 years to the first generation of LEDs I saw my first ones in 1969 - that's over 50 years ago. "over 40 years" covers 50 years ago. |
#43
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Lighting Incompatibility?
On 21/12/2020 10:18, Paul wrote:
Cursitor Doom wrote: On Sat, 19 Dec 2020 17:49:13 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 19/12/2020 10:23, Cursitor Doom wrote: On Sat, 19 Dec 2020 04:24:58 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: Worse. I have weird interactions between dimmers, banks of LEDS and incandescents..where dimming one bank starts another bank flickering. I conclude there is some sort of HF hash being put out... Oh! Well, if it can happen to YOU it can happen to the best of us, I guess. I suppose it's time to bite the bullet and dump ALL the remaining tubes and embrace greener tech for once! The old fluos turned out to be 2400mm long - much longer than the 6' they'd appeared from floor level. Perhaps maintaining a discharge over that distance is a more precarious undertaking than with the more common, shorter tube lengths usually encountered.:-/ LED tubes are not quite as efficient as a good fluoro (sp!) but they don't flicker as badly and the light quality is softer and more even across the spectrum And they don't contain mercu Er.... LEDs less efficient than fluoro?? Are we being lied to by TPTB about that as well? There's actually a web page that explains the *multiple* types of LED tube products, and how to get the best from them. Type A. Type B. Type C. Type D=A+B ? With a chart like this, you can see that one product, touts 140 lumens per watt. The industry does not place a premium on providing efficiency information, so that chart might be all that you get in the way of hints. What it does mean, is if you shop around, you might find a good one. https://img.ledsmagazine.com/files/b...fit=max&w=1440 ** ( https://www.ledsmagazine.com/smart-l...ticle/16695188 ) Removing the ballast, and not using Type A, would be a start. Type A – Easiest Installation LED Tube with Integrated Driver – Compatible and Operated on Existing LFL Ballast Type B – Simplest Total System Ballast Bypass LED Tube – Wired to Mains Type C – Best Performance LED Tube with Remote Driver ******* Page 32* Comparison of three lighting solutions. https://na.eventscloud.com/file_uplo..._EFC201 6.pdf **************************** energy regular T8****************** 280320 LED Tube on Ballast output** 183960 LED Tube, bypass to mains*** 157680 There's no number for the remote driver case. The LED tube has a firing angle of 160 degrees and does not rely on the reflector returning the "back light". LED versus CFL. https://img.ledsmagazine.com/files/b...fit=max&w=1440 But it would be nice to see the same fittings with cleaned diffusers and new working in fluorescents in a 3rd photo. -- Adam |
#44
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Lighting Incompatibility?
In article , Cursitor Doom
wrote: On Wed, 23 Dec 2020 10:27:48 +0000 (GMT), charles wrote: In article , Cursitor Doom wrote: On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 19:29:23 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: red leds were always a volt and a bit, orange yellow a bit more and green and blue even more https://www.circuitbread.com/ee-faq/...different-leds Ok, I'll have to read that item later due to shortage of time right now, but I'm harking back over 40 years to the first generation of LEDs I saw my first ones in 1969 - that's over 50 years ago. "over 40 years" covers 50 years ago. true but 'over 50' is more accurate - gives an even longer time ago, -- from KT24 in Surrey, England "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle |
#45
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Lighting Incompatibility?
On Wed, 23 Dec 2020 18:44:21 +0000 (GMT), charles
wrote: In article , Cursitor Doom wrote: On Wed, 23 Dec 2020 10:27:48 +0000 (GMT), charles wrote: In article , Cursitor Doom wrote: On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 19:29:23 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: red leds were always a volt and a bit, orange yellow a bit more and green and blue even more https://www.circuitbread.com/ee-faq/...different-leds Ok, I'll have to read that item later due to shortage of time right now, but I'm harking back over 40 years to the first generation of LEDs I saw my first ones in 1969 - that's over 50 years ago. "over 40 years" covers 50 years ago. true but 'over 50' is more accurate - gives an even longer time ago, Yeah, I can see how it could have been taken to mean two different things on reflection. |
#46
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Lighting Incompatibility?
On 23/12/2020 18:28, ARW wrote:
On 21/12/2020 10:18, Paul wrote: Cursitor Doom wrote: On Sat, 19 Dec 2020 17:49:13 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 19/12/2020 10:23, Cursitor Doom wrote: On Sat, 19 Dec 2020 04:24:58 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: Worse. I have weird interactions between dimmers, banks of LEDS and incandescents..where dimming one bank starts another bank flickering. I conclude there is some sort of HF hash being put out... Oh! Well, if it can happen to YOU it can happen to the best of us, I guess. I suppose it's time to bite the bullet and dump ALL the remaining tubes and embrace greener tech for once! The old fluos turned out to be 2400mm long - much longer than the 6' they'd appeared from floor level. Perhaps maintaining a discharge over that distance is a more precarious undertaking than with the more common, shorter tube lengths usually encountered.:-/ LED tubes are not quite as efficient as a good fluoro (sp!) but they don't flicker as badly and the light quality is softer and more even across the spectrum And they don't contain mercu Er.... LEDs less efficient than fluoro?? Are we being lied to by TPTB about that as well? There's actually a web page that explains the *multiple* types of LED tube products, and how to get the best from them. Type A. Type B. Type C. Type D=A+B ? With a chart like this, you can see that one product, touts 140 lumens per watt. The industry does not place a premium on providing efficiency information, so that chart might be all that you get in the way of hints. What it does mean, is if you shop around, you might find a good one. https://img.ledsmagazine.com/files/b...fit=max&w=1440 Â*Â*Â* ( https://www.ledsmagazine.com/smart-l...ticle/16695188 ) Removing the ballast, and not using Type A, would be a start. Type A €“ Easiest Installation LED Tube with Integrated Driver €“ Compatible and Operated on Existing LFL Ballast Type B €“ Simplest Total System Ballast Bypass LED Tube €“ Wired to Mains Type C €“ Best Performance LED Tube with Remote Driver ******* Page 32Â* Comparison of three lighting solutions. https://na.eventscloud.com/file_uplo..._EFC201 6.pdf Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* Â*Â*Â*Â* energy regular T8Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â*Â* 280320 LED Tube on Ballast outputÂ*Â* 183960 LED Tube, bypass to mainsÂ*Â*Â* 157680 There's no number for the remote driver case. The LED tube has a firing angle of 160 degrees and does not rely on the reflector returning the "back light". LED versus CFL. https://img.ledsmagazine.com/files/b...fit=max&w=1440 But it would be nice to see the same fittings with cleaned diffusers and new working in fluorescents in a 3rd photo. I love a bit of marketing FUD cunningly disguises as 'scientific research' -- Any fool can believe in principles - and most of them do! |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
GU10 incompatibility | UK diy | |||
Track Lighting and Other Lighting | Home Repair | |||
kitchen lighting: track system with pendant lighting | UK diy | |||
VCR/LCD incompatibility puzzle... | Electronics Repair | |||
Sharp VCR Tracking Incompatibility | Electronics Repair |