On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 13:57:00 +1000, "Jake56" wrote:



"Jethro_uk" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 00:52:47 +0100, alan_m wrote:

On 10/06/2020 21:52, Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp Esq wrote:

[quoted text muted]

But that doesn't stop UK farmers putting any symbol they want on
packaging to indicate UK origin or high welfare or hygiene standards.

US companies will be allowed to sue (in secret courts) for any decisions
by the UK government that are adjudged (by them) to have affected their
profits.

You don’t know that that will be in the agreement.

And that wouldn’t stop UK farmers putting any symbol
they want on packaging to indicate UK origin or high
welfare or hygiene standards anyway.

Isn't there a new BSI Kitemark for Food Assurance being launched soon?

Jethro_uk wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 00:52:47 +0100, alan_m wrote:

On 10/06/2020 21:52, Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp Esq wrote:

[quoted text muted]

But that doesn't stop UK farmers putting any symbol they want on
packaging to indicate UK origin or high welfare or hygiene standards.

US companies will be allowed to sue (in secret courts) for any decisions
by the UK government that are adjudged (by them) to have affected their
profits.

If you think they are going to sit back and allow UK farmers to mess
their profits up, you might be in for a surprise.


Yawn, Project Fear Mk 2. Even the EU werent able to stop things like the
€˜red tractor mark.



--
https://www.unitedway.org/our-impact...an-trafficking

Rambo wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 13:57:00 +1000, "Jake56" wrote:



"Jethro_uk" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 00:52:47 +0100, alan_m wrote:

On 10/06/2020 21:52, Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp Esq wrote:

[quoted text muted]

But that doesn't stop UK farmers putting any symbol they want on
packaging to indicate UK origin or high welfare or hygiene standards.

US companies will be allowed to sue (in secret courts) for any decisions
by the UK government that are adjudged (by them) to have affected their
profits.

You donÂ’t know that that will be in the agreement.

And that wouldnÂ’t stop UK farmers putting any symbol
they want on packaging to indicate UK origin or high
welfare or hygiene standards anyway.

Isn't there a new BSI Kitemark for Food Assurance being launched soon?


The Americans wont allow anything to be added to labels that will allow
consumers to identify that it is chlorine-drenched US of A meat. The US
trade deal negotiators have already told the British this. They have also
said that this is a red line; no foul chlorine-drenched chicken, no trade
deal.

--
M0TEY // STC // #SaveOurNHS

On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 06:13:26 -0000 (UTC), Stephen Cole
wrote:

Rambo wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 13:57:00 +1000, "Jake56" wrote:



"Jethro_uk" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 00:52:47 +0100, alan_m wrote:

On 10/06/2020 21:52, Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp Esq wrote:

[quoted text muted]

But that doesn't stop UK farmers putting any symbol they want on
packaging to indicate UK origin or high welfare or hygiene standards.

US companies will be allowed to sue (in secret courts) for any decisions
by the UK government that are adjudged (by them) to have affected their
profits.

You don?t know that that will be in the agreement.

And that wouldn?t stop UK farmers putting any symbol
they want on packaging to indicate UK origin or high
welfare or hygiene standards anyway.

Isn't there a new BSI Kitemark for Food Assurance being launched soon?


The Americans won’t allow anything to be added to labels that will allow
consumers to identify that it is chlorine-drenched US of A meat. The US
trade deal negotiators have already told the British this. They have also
said that this is a red line; no foul chlorine-drenched chicken, no trade
deal.

" there is no proof that eating chlorinated chicken would put health
at risk. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has said that
chemical substances in poultry meat are unlikely to pose an immediate
or acute health risk for consumers; in a 2005 study, the EFSA found
that treating poultry carcasses with the four most-commonly used
antimicrobial substances (agents that kill microorganisms) “would be
of no safety concern.”

On 13/06/2020 08:31, Rambo wrote:
Stephen Cole wrote:

The Americans won�t allow anything to be added to labels that will allow
consumers to identify that it is chlorine-drenched US of A meat. The US
trade deal negotiators have already told the British this. They have also
said that this is a red line; no foul chlorine-drenched chicken, no trade
deal.

"...there is no proof that eating chlorinated chicken would put health
at risk. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has said that
chemical substances in poultry meat are unlikely to pose an immediate
or acute health risk for consumers; in a 2005 study, the EFSA found
that treating poultry carcasses with the four most-commonly used
antimicrobial substances (agents that kill microorganisms) 'would be
of no safety concern.'

Anyone could get the mistaken impression from his postings that Cole is
being forced against his will to eat chlorine-drenched chicken.
Doubtless, he hasn't complained of chlorine-drenched vegetables.

I don't recall Cole ever complaining about the Spanish ****-drenched
vegetables that were on the market a few years ago, but perhaps that was
because the item sunk without trace when it turned out they weren't
Spanish ****-drenched vegetables but German ****-drenched vegetables
instead. Funny, that.

--
Spike

In article ,
Rambo wrote:
The Americans won’t allow anything to be added to labels that will allow
consumers to identify that it is chlorine-drenched US of A meat. The US
trade deal negotiators have already told the British this. They have also
said that this is a red line; no foul chlorine-drenched chicken, no trade
deal.

" there is no proof that eating chlorinated chicken would put health
at risk. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has said that
chemical substances in poultry meat are unlikely to pose an immediate
or acute health risk for consumers; in a 2005 study, the EFSA found
that treating poultry carcasses with the four most-commonly used
antimicrobial substances (agents that kill microorganisms) “would be
of no safety concern.”

Do you sprinkle chlorine over your UK chicken before eating it, then?

--
*Welcome to **** Creek - sorry, we're out of paddles*

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

On 13/06/2020 09:59, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
Rambo wrote:

The Americans won�t allow anything to be added to labels that will allow
consumers to identify that it is chlorine-drenched US of A meat. The US
trade deal negotiators have already told the British this. They have also
said that this is a red line; no foul chlorine-drenched chicken, no trade
deal.

" there is no proof that eating chlorinated chicken would put health
at risk. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has said that
chemical substances in poultry meat are unlikely to pose an immediate
or acute health risk for consumers; in a 2005 study, the EFSA found
that treating poultry carcasses with the four most-commonly used
antimicrobial substances (agents that kill microorganisms) �would be
of no safety concern.�

Do you sprinkle chlorine over your UK chicken before eating it, then?

So you really think that people eat chicken carcases raw, do you?

--
Spike

On 13/06/2020 11:25, Spike wrote:
On 13/06/2020 09:59, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
Rambo wrote:

The Americans won�t allow anything to be added to labels that will allow
consumers to identify that it is chlorine-drenched US of A meat. The US
trade deal negotiators have already told the British this. They have also
said that this is a red line; no foul chlorine-drenched chicken, no trade
deal.

" there is no proof that eating chlorinated chicken would put health
at risk. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has said that
chemical substances in poultry meat are unlikely to pose an immediate
or acute health risk for consumers; in a 2005 study, the EFSA found
that treating poultry carcasses with the four most-commonly used
antimicrobial substances (agents that kill microorganisms) �would be
of no safety concern.�

Do you sprinkle chlorine over your UK chicken before eating it, then?

So you really think that people eat chicken carcases raw, do you?

They do but no here.
In Japan they eat raw chicken as sashimi.
I hosted some Japanese at a 2 week long event who tried to eat raw
chicken. It is a bi annual event and we now have to add "Tell the
Japanese not to eat raw chicken" on the risk assessment.

The instance of salmonella, campilobacter and e coli is lower in
Japanese chicken.

Andy

On 13/06/2020 10:59, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
Rambo wrote:
The Americans wont allow anything to be added to labels that will allow
consumers to identify that it is chlorine-drenched US of A meat. The US
trade deal negotiators have already told the British this. They have also
said that this is a red line; no foul chlorine-drenched chicken, no trade
deal.

" there is no proof that eating chlorinated chicken would put health
at risk. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has said that
chemical substances in poultry meat are unlikely to pose an immediate
or acute health risk for consumers; in a 2005 study, the EFSA found
that treating poultry carcasses with the four most-commonly used
antimicrobial substances (agents that kill microorganisms) €œwould be
of no safety concern.€�

Do you sprinkle chlorine over your UK chicken before eating it, then?

He might if it's chemically combined with sodium.

--
Max Demian

On 13/06/2020 11:25, Spike wrote:
On 13/06/2020 09:59, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
Rambo wrote:


Do you sprinkle chlorine over your UK chicken before eating it, then?

So you really think that people eat chicken carcases raw, do you?


Indeed almost anyone who puts any water based dressing on their chicken
will be sprinkling chlorine over it.

Its such a non-issue.


--
€œIt is hard to imagine a more stupid decision or more dangerous way of
making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people
who pay no price for being wrong.€�

Thomas Sowell

On 13/06/2020 12:04, Max Demian wrote:
On 13/06/2020 10:59, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
Â*Â*Â* Rambo wrote:
The Americans wont allow anything to be added to labels that will
allow
consumers to identify that it is chlorine-drenched US of A meat. The US
trade deal negotiators have already told the British this. They have
also
said that this is a red line; no foul chlorine-drenched chicken, no
trade
deal.

" there is no proof that eating chlorinated chicken would put health
at risk. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has said that
chemical substances in poultry meat are unlikely to pose an immediate
or acute health risk for consumers; in a 2005 study, the EFSA found
that treating poultry carcasses with the four most-commonly used
antimicrobial substances (agents that kill microorganisms) €œwould be
of no safety concern.€�

Do you sprinkle chlorine over your UK chicken before eating it, then?

He might if it's chemically combined with sodium.

ROFLMAO!



--
"First, find out who are the people you can not criticise. They are your
oppressors."
- George Orwell

On 13/06/2020 11:45, AndyW wrote:
On 13/06/2020 11:25, Spike wrote:
On 13/06/2020 09:59, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
Â*Â*Â* Rambo wrote:

The Americans won�t allow anything to be added to labels that will
allow
consumers to identify that it is chlorine-drenched US of A meat.
The US
trade deal negotiators have already told the British this. They
have also
said that this is a red line; no foul chlorine-drenched chicken, no
trade
deal.

" there is no proof that eating chlorinated chicken would put health
at risk. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has said that
chemical substances in poultry meat are unlikely to pose an immediate
or acute health risk for consumers; in a 2005 study, the EFSA found
that treating poultry carcasses with the four most-commonly used
antimicrobial substances (agents that kill microorganisms) �would be
of no safety concern.�

Do you sprinkle chlorine over your UK chicken before eating it, then?

So you really think that people eat chicken carcases raw, do you?

They do but no here.
In Japan they eat raw chicken as sashimi.
I hosted some Japanese at a 2 week long event who tried to eat raw
chicken. It is a bi annual event and we now have to add "Tell the
Japanese not to eat raw chicken" on the risk assessment.

The instance of salmonella, campilobacter and e coli is lower in
Japanese chicken.

Andy

The answer is to flash them past a cobalt 60 source


--
"First, find out who are the people you can not criticise. They are your
oppressors."
- George Orwell

In article ,
Spike wrote:
On 13/06/2020 09:59, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
Rambo wrote:

The Americans won#t allow anything to be added to labels that will allow
consumers to identify that it is chlorine-drenched US of A meat. The US
trade deal negotiators have already told the British this. They have also
said that this is a red line; no foul chlorine-drenched chicken, no trade
deal.

" there is no proof that eating chlorinated chicken would put health
at risk. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has said that
chemical substances in poultry meat are unlikely to pose an immediate
or acute health risk for consumers; in a 2005 study, the EFSA found
that treating poultry carcasses with the four most-commonly used
antimicrobial substances (agents that kill microorganisms) #would be
of no safety concern.#

Do you sprinkle chlorine over your UK chicken before eating it, then?

So you really think that people eat chicken carcases raw, do you?

I'd rather chickens and other animals we eat are bred and kept under
hygienic and humane conditions. The point you seem to be ignoring.

--
*Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies.

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

In article nrir.org.uk,
Brian Morrison wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 06:13:26 +0000, Stephen Cole wrote:

Isn't there a new BSI Kitemark for Food Assurance being launched soon?


The Americans won‘t allow anything to be added to labels that will allow
consumers to identify that it is chlorine-drenched US of A meat. The US
trade deal negotiators have already told the British this. They have
also said that this is a red line; no foul chlorine-drenched chicken, no
trade deal.

We already export more to the US than any other country, why do we have
to have a trade deal with them when we manage perfectly well without one
now and always have done?

we need to expand our market there to sell all the stuff we won't sell to
the EU

--
from KT24 in Surrey, England
"I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

On 13/06/2020 12:41, Brian Morrison wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 06:13:26 +0000, Stephen Cole wrote:

Isn't there a new BSI Kitemark for Food Assurance being launched soon?


The Americans wont allow anything to be added to labels that will allow
consumers to identify that it is chlorine-drenched US of A meat. The US
trade deal negotiators have already told the British this. They have
also said that this is a red line; no foul chlorine-drenched chicken, no
trade deal.

We already export more to the US than any other country, why do we have
to have a trade deal with them when we manage perfectly well without one
now and always have done?

When you order the same items from china, and it costs £60, and arrives
in the post for free, and from the USA, and it cots £120 because of DHL
charges agents charges, VAT charges on shipping, import duty and takes 6
weeks etc etc you will know the answer to that


--
Climate Change: Socialism wearing a lab coat.

Rambo wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 06:13:26 -0000 (UTC), Stephen Cole
wrote:

Rambo wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 13:57:00 +1000, "Jake56" wrote:



"Jethro_uk" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 00:52:47 +0100, alan_m wrote:

On 10/06/2020 21:52, Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp Esq wrote:

[quoted text muted]

But that doesn't stop UK farmers putting any symbol they want on
packaging to indicate UK origin or high welfare or hygiene standards.

US companies will be allowed to sue (in secret courts) for any decisions
by the UK government that are adjudged (by them) to have affected their
profits.

You don?t know that that will be in the agreement.

And that wouldn?t stop UK farmers putting any symbol
they want on packaging to indicate UK origin or high
welfare or hygiene standards anyway.

Isn't there a new BSI Kitemark for Food Assurance being launched soon?


The Americans wonÂ’t allow anything to be added to labels that will allow
consumers to identify that it is chlorine-drenched US of A meat. The US
trade deal negotiators have already told the British this. They have also
said that this is a red line; no foul chlorine-drenched chicken, no trade
deal.

" there is no proof that eating chlorinated chicken would put health
at risk. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has said that
chemical substances in poultry meat are unlikely to pose an immediate
or acute health risk for consumers; in a 2005 study, the EFSA found
that treating poultry carcasses with the four most-commonly used
antimicrobial substances (agents that kill microorganisms) “would be
of no safety concern.”

97% of tested chlorinated chicken was found to be caked in faecal matter,
Rich.

--
M0TEY // STC // #SaveOurNHS

Brian Morrison wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 06:13:26 +0000, Stephen Cole wrote:

Isn't there a new BSI Kitemark for Food Assurance being launched soon?


The Americans wont allow anything to be added to labels that will allow
consumers to identify that it is chlorine-drenched US of A meat. The US
trade deal negotiators have already told the British this. They have
also said that this is a red line; no foul chlorine-drenched chicken, no
trade deal.

We already export more to the US than any other country, why do we have
to have a trade deal with them when we manage perfectly well without one
now and always have done?

Ask Boris.

--
M0TEY // STC // #SaveOurNHS

On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 17:06:52 -0000 (UTC), Stephen Cole
wrote:

97% of tested chlorinated chicken was found to be caked in faecal matter

Well I know you have a fetish about that sort of thing......

In article ,
The Natural Philosopher wrote:
We already export more to the US than any other country, why do we have
to have a trade deal with them when we manage perfectly well without one
now and always have done?

When you order the same items from china, and it costs £60, and arrives
in the post for free, and from the USA, and it cots £120 because of DHL
charges agents charges, VAT charges on shipping, import duty and takes 6
weeks etc etc you will know the answer to that

Yes. The US is becoming a spent force in the world as it is now. And one
of the last places we should be trying to do a deal with.

Contrast it with the EU. Peace of **** to send anything anywhere within
it. Same with banking, etc.

--
*Some days we are the flies; some days we are the windscreen.*

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

On 13/06/2020 18:17, Rambo wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 17:06:52 -0000 (UTC), Stephen Cole
wrote:

97% of tested chlorinated chicken was found to be caked in faecal matter

Well I know you have a fetish about that sort of thing......

he does......

On 13/06/2020 18:17, Rambo wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 17:06:52 -0000 (UTC), Stephen Cole
wrote:

97% of tested chlorinated chicken was found to be caked in faecal matter

Well I know you have a fetish about that sort of thing......

99% of all eggs have bacteria on them

--
If I had all the money I've spent on drink...
...I'd spend it on drink.

Sir Henry (at Rawlinson's End)

On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 10:19:09 +0100, "tim..."
wrote:



"Stephen Cole" wrote in message
...
https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...inated-chicken

This’ll be how Brexiteers will be remembered; as the bigoted fools that
voted to inject filth into our food chain. Scumbags.

for the umpteenth time:

you eat this stuff every time you go on holiday to the USA

did it do you any harm then?

There might be some valid (economic) arguments against this move

That they are dangerous foods to eat is not one of them

HTH

tim


The EU does not set stringent quality demands on food for nothing.

Thatcher was warned, but that didn't stop her bringing BSE to the UK
and thus the rest of the world.

If people do suffer from food related health problems, there are still
profits to be made.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...treatment.html

The food is dangerous to eat. If you do not believe me, ask your water
company how much they are investing in front end analysis in order to
reduce the chlorine loading. Then of course there are hormones and
genetic manipulation.

The US are rubbing their hands in glee, carcinogenic foods and a
privatised NHS.

Nice one Boris.

AB
From the well pummelled keyboard of Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp Esq

"Stephen Cole" wrote in message
...
Rambo wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 06:13:26 -0000 (UTC), Stephen Cole
wrote:

Rambo wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 13:57:00 +1000, "Jake56" wrote:



"Jethro_uk" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 00:52:47 +0100, alan_m wrote:

On 10/06/2020 21:52, Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp Esq wrote:

[quoted text muted]

But that doesn't stop UK farmers putting any symbol they want on
packaging to indicate UK origin or high welfare or hygiene
standards.

US companies will be allowed to sue (in secret courts) for any
decisions
by the UK government that are adjudged (by them) to have affected
their
profits.

You don?t know that that will be in the agreement.

And that wouldn?t stop UK farmers putting any symbol
they want on packaging to indicate UK origin or high
welfare or hygiene standards anyway.

Isn't there a new BSI Kitemark for Food Assurance being launched soon?


The Americans wont allow anything to be added to labels that will allow
consumers to identify that it is chlorine-drenched US of A meat. The US
trade deal negotiators have already told the British this. They have
also
said that this is a red line; no foul chlorine-drenched chicken, no
trade
deal.

" there is no proof that eating chlorinated chicken would put health
at risk. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has said that
chemical substances in poultry meat are unlikely to pose an immediate
or acute health risk for consumers; in a 2005 study, the EFSA found
that treating poultry carcasses with the four most-commonly used
antimicrobial substances (agents that kill microorganisms) €œwould be
of no safety concern.€�

97% of tested chlorinated chicken was found to be caked in faecal matter,
Rich.

Thats a bared faced like with your caked lie.

On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 14:02:11 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

FLUSH the trolling senile asshole's latest troll**** unread

--
Website (from 2007) dedicated to the 86-year-old senile Australian
cretin's pathological trolling:
https://www.pcreview.co.uk/threads/r...d-faq.2973853/

On 13/06/2020 17:17, Rambo wrote:
Stephen Cole wrote:

97% of tested chlorinated chicken was found to be caked in faecal matter

Well I know you have a fetish about that sort of thing......

97 percent of smartphones tested are found to be caked in faecal matter.


--
Spike

On 14/06/2020 10:14, Spike wrote:
On 13/06/2020 17:17, Rambo wrote:
Stephen Cole wrote:

97% of tested chlorinated chicken was found to be caked in faecal matter

Well I know you have a fetish about that sort of thing......

97 percent of smartphones tested are found to be caked in faecal matter.


speshly if cole inserts it analy ....

On 14/06/2020 11:15:50, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
On 14/06/2020 10:14, Spike wrote:
On 13/06/2020 17:17, Rambo wrote:
Â* Stephen Cole wrote:

97% of tested chlorinated chicken was found to be caked in faecal
matter

Well I know you have a fetish about that sort of thing......

97 percent of smartphones tested are found to be caked in faecal matter.


speshly if cole inserts it analy ....

Is that your experience, or a long lived fantasy?

On 14/06/2020 11:33, Fredxx wrote:
On 14/06/2020 11:15:50, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
On 14/06/2020 10:14, Spike wrote:
On 13/06/2020 17:17, Rambo wrote:
Â* Stephen Cole wrote:

97% of tested chlorinated chicken was found to be caked in faecal
matter

Well I know you have a fetish about that sort of thing......

97 percent of smartphones tested are found to be caked in faecal matter.


speshly if cole inserts it analy ....

Is that your experience, or a long lived fantasy?
No...just an observation on how his would be covered in ****e .....

In article ,
tim... wrote:
you eat this stuff every time you go on holiday to the USA

did it do you any harm then?

It certainly hasn't done Trump any harm.

--
*Until I was thirteen, I thought my name was SHUT UP .

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

In article ,
The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 13/06/2020 18:17, Rambo wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 17:06:52 -0000 (UTC), Stephen Cole
wrote:

97% of tested chlorinated chicken was found to be caked in faecal matter

Well I know you have a fetish about that sort of thing......

99% of all eggs have bacteria on them

You eat eggshells?

Is this a fetish?

--
*Rehab is for quitters.

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

In article ,
Spike wrote:
On 13/06/2020 17:17, Rambo wrote:
Stephen Cole wrote:

97% of tested chlorinated chicken was found to be caked in faecal
matter

Well I know you have a fetish about that sort of thing......

97 percent of smartphones tested are found to be caked in faecal matter.

As it pretty well everything people touch if you have sensitive measuring
equipment.

--
*If only you'd use your powers for good instead of evil.

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

On 14/06/2020 11:42:34, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
On 14/06/2020 11:33, Fredxx wrote:
On 14/06/2020 11:15:50, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
On 14/06/2020 10:14, Spike wrote:
On 13/06/2020 17:17, Rambo wrote:
Â* Stephen Cole wrote:

97% of tested chlorinated chicken was found to be caked in faecal
matter

Well I know you have a fetish about that sort of thing......

97 percent of smartphones tested are found to be caked in faecal
matter.


speshly if cole inserts it analy ....

Is that your experience, or a long lived fantasy?
No...just an observation on how his would be covered in ****e .....

Some of us don't care, we don't have infatuations with other people's dicks.

On 14/06/2020 12:14, Fredxx wrote:
On 14/06/2020 11:42:34, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
On 14/06/2020 11:33, Fredxx wrote:
On 14/06/2020 11:15:50, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
On 14/06/2020 10:14, Spike wrote:
On 13/06/2020 17:17, Rambo wrote:
Â* Stephen Cole wrote:

97% of tested chlorinated chicken was found to be caked in faecal
matter

Well I know you have a fetish about that sort of thing......

97 percent of smartphones tested are found to be caked in faecal
matter.


speshly if cole inserts it analy ....

Is that your experience, or a long lived fantasy?
No...just an observation on how his would be covered in ****e .....

Some of us don't care, we don't have infatuations with other people's
dicks.
It's involantary when I see an outed poofter on TV I picture oral
sex.....ryland etc

--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com

On 14/06/2020 12:01, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article ,
Spike wrote:
On 13/06/2020 17:17, Rambo wrote:
Stephen Cole wrote:

97% of tested chlorinated chicken was found to be caked in faecal
matter

Well I know you have a fetish about that sort of thing......

97 percent of smartphones tested are found to be caked in faecal matter.

As it pretty well everything people touch if you have sensitive measuring
equipment.

I remember an inventor brought his machine to Glasgow which could detect
drugs on paper money....every £20 note set off the alarm...tee hee

--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com

On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 12:38:01 +0100
"Jim GM4DHJ ..." wrote:

On 14/06/2020 12:14, Fredxx wrote:
On 14/06/2020 11:42:34, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
On 14/06/2020 11:33, Fredxx wrote:
On 14/06/2020 11:15:50, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
On 14/06/2020 10:14, Spike wrote:
On 13/06/2020 17:17, Rambo wrote:
Â* Stephen Cole wrote:

97% of tested chlorinated chicken was found to be caked in
faecal matter

Well I know you have a fetish about that sort of thing......

97 percent of smartphones tested are found to be caked in
faecal matter.


speshly if cole inserts it analy ....

Is that your experience, or a long lived fantasy?
No...just an observation on how his would be covered in
****e .....

Some of us don't care, we don't have infatuations with other
people's dicks.
It's involantary when I see an outed poofter on TV I picture oral
sex.....ryland etc


Grindr angle?

Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
On 14/06/2020 12:14, Fredxx wrote:
On 14/06/2020 11:42:34, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
On 14/06/2020 11:33, Fredxx wrote:
On 14/06/2020 11:15:50, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
On 14/06/2020 10:14, Spike wrote:
On 13/06/2020 17:17, Rambo wrote:
Â* Stephen Cole wrote:

97% of tested chlorinated chicken was found to be caked in faecal
matter

Well I know you have a fetish about that sort of thing......

97 percent of smartphones tested are found to be caked in faecal
matter.


speshly if cole inserts it analy ....

Is that your experience, or a long lived fantasy?
No...just an observation on how his would be covered in ****e .....

Some of us don't care, we don't have infatuations with other people's
dicks.
It's involantary when I see an outed poofter on TV I picture oral
sex.....ryland etc


You randy old goat, Jim. Thanks, Jim.

--
M0TEY // STC // #SaveOurNHS

On 14/06/2020 14:23, Stephen Cole wrote:
Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
On 14/06/2020 12:14, Fredxx wrote:
On 14/06/2020 11:42:34, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
On 14/06/2020 11:33, Fredxx wrote:
On 14/06/2020 11:15:50, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
On 14/06/2020 10:14, Spike wrote:
On 13/06/2020 17:17, Rambo wrote:
Â* Stephen Cole wrote:

97% of tested chlorinated chicken was found to be caked in faecal
matter

Well I know you have a fetish about that sort of thing......

97 percent of smartphones tested are found to be caked in faecal
matter.


speshly if cole inserts it analy ....

Is that your experience, or a long lived fantasy?
No...just an observation on how his would be covered in ****e .....

Some of us don't care, we don't have infatuations with other people's
dicks.
It's involantary when I see an outed poofter on TV I picture oral
sex.....ryland etc


You randy old goat, Jim. Thanks, Jim.

aflicted

--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com

On 14/06/2020 14:21, Bernie wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 12:38:01 +0100
"Jim GM4DHJ ..." wrote:

On 14/06/2020 12:14, Fredxx wrote:
On 14/06/2020 11:42:34, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
On 14/06/2020 11:33, Fredxx wrote:
On 14/06/2020 11:15:50, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
On 14/06/2020 10:14, Spike wrote:
On 13/06/2020 17:17, Rambo wrote:
Â* Stephen Cole wrote:

97% of tested chlorinated chicken was found to be caked in
faecal matter

Well I know you have a fetish about that sort of thing......

97 percent of smartphones tested are found to be caked in
faecal matter.


speshly if cole inserts it analy ....

Is that your experience, or a long lived fantasy?
No...just an observation on how his would be covered in
****e .....

Some of us don't care, we don't have infatuations with other
people's dicks.
It's involantary when I see an outed poofter on TV I picture oral
sex.....ryland etc


Grindr angle?


six inch or nine inch ? ...hear nine inch are now banned .....

--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com

On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 14:32:13 +0100
"Jim GM4DHJ ..." wrote:

On 14/06/2020 14:21, Bernie wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 12:38:01 +0100
"Jim GM4DHJ ..." wrote:

On 14/06/2020 12:14, Fredxx wrote:
On 14/06/2020 11:42:34, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
On 14/06/2020 11:33, Fredxx wrote:
On 14/06/2020 11:15:50, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
On 14/06/2020 10:14, Spike wrote:
On 13/06/2020 17:17, Rambo wrote:
Â* Stephen Cole wrote:

97% of tested chlorinated chicken was found to be caked in
faecal matter

Well I know you have a fetish about that sort of
thing......

97 percent of smartphones tested are found to be caked in
faecal matter.


speshly if cole inserts it analy ....

Is that your experience, or a long lived fantasy?
No...just an observation on how his would be covered in
****e .....

Some of us don't care, we don't have infatuations with other
people's dicks.
It's involantary when I see an outed poofter on TV I picture oral
sex.....ryland etc


Grindr angle?


six inch or nine inch ? ...hear nine inch are now banned .....


Is it cos they're black?

On 14/06/2020 14:33, Bernie wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 14:32:13 +0100
"Jim GM4DHJ ..." wrote:

On 14/06/2020 14:21, Bernie wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 12:38:01 +0100
"Jim GM4DHJ ..." wrote:

On 14/06/2020 12:14, Fredxx wrote:
On 14/06/2020 11:42:34, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
On 14/06/2020 11:33, Fredxx wrote:
On 14/06/2020 11:15:50, Jim GM4DHJ ... wrote:
On 14/06/2020 10:14, Spike wrote:
On 13/06/2020 17:17, Rambo wrote:
Â* Stephen Cole wrote:

97% of tested chlorinated chicken was found to be caked in
faecal matter

Well I know you have a fetish about that sort of
thing......

97 percent of smartphones tested are found to be caked in
faecal matter.


speshly if cole inserts it analy ....

Is that your experience, or a long lived fantasy?
No...just an observation on how his would be covered in
****e .....

Some of us don't care, we don't have infatuations with other
people's dicks.
It's involantary when I see an outed poofter on TV I picture oral
sex.....ryland etc


Grindr angle?


six inch or nine inch ? ...hear nine inch are now banned .....


Is it cos they're black?


no the vibration... asked over on diy ...they know everything ...

--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com