"nightjar" wrote in message
...
On 28/10/2019 17:30, harry wrote:
Who to vote for by constituency. Look up yours.
https://oneuk.org/?fbclid=IwAR3esgi_...TK_u2X0pWDquSY

I thoroughly recommend any Leave supporters to follow this advice. The
more votes that the Brexit Party can take from the Conservatives, the less
chance the Conservatives have of getting a strong (or possibly any)
majority.

Given how few seats UKIP ever got, you're off with the fairys, again.

Even less chance now that a no deal brexit is even less likely.

On 29/10/2019 15:06, Rod Speed wrote:


"nightjar" wrote in message
...
On 28/10/2019 17:30, harry wrote:
Who to vote for by constituency.Â* Look up yours.
https://oneuk.org/?fbclid=IwAR3esgi_...TK_u2X0pWDquSY


I thoroughly recommend any Leave supporters to follow this advice. The
more votes that the Brexit Party can take from the Conservatives, the
less chance the Conservatives have of getting a strong (or possibly
any) majority.

Given how few seats UKIP ever got, you're off with the fairys, again.

I'm not expecting them to win any seats, merely to cause the
Conservatives to lose a number of marginal seats.

Even less chance now that a no deal brexit is even less likely.

Exactly the reason there could be a resurgence of support for TBP.

--
Colin Bignell

On Wed, 30 Oct 2019 02:06:23 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

FLUSH the trolling senile asshole's latest troll****

Get treatment, you disgusting, nym-shifting, trolling, senile pest!

--
Marland answering senile Rodent's statement, "I don't leak":
"That¢s because so much **** and ****e emanates from your gob that there is
nothing left to exit normally, your arsehole has clammed shut through disuse
and the end of prick is only clear because you are such a ******."
Message-ID:

nightjar wrote
Rod Speed wrote
nightjar wrote
harry wrote

Who to vote for by constituency. Look up yours.
https://oneuk.org/?fbclid=IwAR3esgi_...TK_u2X0pWDquSY

I thoroughly recommend any Leave supporters to follow this advice. The
more votes that the Brexit Party can take from the Conservatives, the
less chance the Conservatives have of getting a strong (or possibly any)
majority.

Given how few seats UKIP ever got, you're off with the fairys, again.

I'm not expecting them to win any seats, merely to cause the Conservatives
to lose a number of marginal seats.

Sure, but I still cant see that given how unlikely a no deal brexit is now.

Interesting to watch Corbyn committing political suicide.
Wonder if he is that stupid or has just decided to retire.

Even less chance now that a no deal brexit is even less likely.

Exactly the reason there could be a resurgence of support for TBP.

I dont believe that there are enough of those who want a no deal
brexit or that there are enough of those in marginal seats either.

IMO yours is just wishful thinking.

Wonder who came up with the way of avoiding the need for a 2/3
majority for a general election and why they didnt think of that earlier.

On Wed, 30 Oct 2019 08:09:29 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:


Wonder who came up with the way of avoiding the need for a 2/3
majority for a general election and why they didn¢t think of that earlier.

I wonder how long it will still take him until he realizes what an asshole
you are, senile Rodent!

--
Website (from 2007) dedicated to the 85-year-old trolling senile
cretin from Oz:
https://www.pcreview.co.uk/threads/r...d-faq.2973853/

On 29/10/2019 21:09, Rod Speed wrote:
....
Wonder who came up with the way of avoiding the need for a 2/3
majority for a general election and why they didnt think of that earlier.

It wouldn't have made much difference without the backing of Labour. As
it happens, the one line bill got more than a 2/3 majority anyway.

--
Colin Bignell

On 29/10/2019 21:09, Rod Speed wrote:
nightjar wrote
Rod Speed wrote
nightjar wrote
harry wrote

Who to vote for by constituency.Â* Look up yours.
https://oneuk.org/?fbclid=IwAR3esgi_...TK_u2X0pWDquSY


I thoroughly recommend any Leave supporters to follow this advice.
The more votes that the Brexit Party can take from the
Conservatives, the less chance the Conservatives have of getting a
strong (or possibly any) majority.

Given how few seats UKIP ever got, you're off with the fairys, again.

I'm not expecting them to win any seats, merely to cause the
Conservatives to lose a number of marginal seats.

Sure, but I still cant see that given how unlikely a no deal brexit is now.

Interesting to watch Corbyn committing political suicide.
Wonder if he is that stupid or has just decided to retire.

Even less chance now that a no deal brexit is even less likely.

Exactly the reason there could be a resurgence of support for TBP.

I dont believe that there are enough of those who want a no deal
brexit or that there are enough of those in marginal seats either.

IMO yours is just wishful thinking.

Wonder who came up with the way of avoiding the need for a 2/3
majority for a general election and why they didnt think of that earlier.

The trouble with a bill is that MPs can propose amendments. Those
amendments could introduce all sorts of restrictions, extras, etc.
Indeed Labour tried to add on giving the vote to 16 and 17 year olds and
millions of EU citizens resident in the UK - a form of gerrymandering.

SteveW

"Steve Walker" wrote in message
...
On 29/10/2019 21:09, Rod Speed wrote:
nightjar wrote
Rod Speed wrote
nightjar wrote
harry wrote

Who to vote for by constituency. Look up yours.
https://oneuk.org/?fbclid=IwAR3esgi_...TK_u2X0pWDquSY

I thoroughly recommend any Leave supporters to follow this advice. The
more votes that the Brexit Party can take from the Conservatives, the
less chance the Conservatives have of getting a strong (or possibly
any) majority.

Given how few seats UKIP ever got, you're off with the fairys, again.

I'm not expecting them to win any seats, merely to cause the
Conservatives to lose a number of marginal seats.

Sure, but I still cant see that given how unlikely a no deal brexit is
now.

Interesting to watch Corbyn committing political suicide.
Wonder if he is that stupid or has just decided to retire.

Even less chance now that a no deal brexit is even less likely.

Exactly the reason there could be a resurgence of support for TBP.

I dont believe that there are enough of those who want a no deal
brexit or that there are enough of those in marginal seats either.

IMO yours is just wishful thinking.

Wonder who came up with the way of avoiding the need for a 2/3
majority for a general election and why they didnt think of that
earlier.

The trouble with a bill is that MPs can propose amendments. Those
amendments could introduce all sorts of restrictions, extras, etc. Indeed
Labour tried to add on giving the vote to 16 and 17 year olds and millions
of EU citizens resident in the UK - a form of gerrymandering.

Sure, but I was really wondering why the law that now requires a 2/3
majority didnt stop a bill with a simple majority short circuiting that.

On Thu, 31 Oct 2019 10:03:37 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

FLUSH troll****

Get the **** out of normally evolved humans' ngs, you abnormal obnoxious
senile pest!

--
Norman Wells addressing senile Rot:
"Ah, the voice of scum speaks."
MID:

On Wed, 30 Oct 2019 22:31:21 +0000, Steve Walker wrote:

The trouble with a bill is that MPs can propose amendments. Those
amendments could introduce all sorts of restrictions, extras,
etc. Indeed Labour tried to add on giving the vote to 16 and 17
year olds and millions of EU citizens resident in the UK - a form
of gerrymandering.

Rather a question of basic fairness. It's the EU citizen residents
and the 16/17 year olds that are most affected by Brexit.

On 31/10/2019 11:53, mechanic wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2019 22:31:21 +0000, Steve Walker wrote:

The trouble with a bill is that MPs can propose amendments. Those
amendments could introduce all sorts of restrictions, extras,
etc. Indeed Labour tried to add on giving the vote to 16 and 17
year olds and millions of EU citizens resident in the UK - a form
of gerrymandering.

Rather a question of basic fairness. It's the EU citizen residents
and the 16/17 year olds that are most affected by Brexit.


Well yes, harry, TNP, and co will be dead long before any benefits come
from brexit, if there are any.

On Fri, 1 Nov 2019 05:42:50 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:


But why should EU citizens have any say on what the UK does ?

Why should a trolling sociopathic asshole from Australia have ANYTHING to
say about the EU or the UK, obnoxious senile cretin?

--
Norman Wells addressing senile Rot:
"Ah, the voice of scum speaks."
MID:

"mechanic" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 30 Oct 2019 22:31:21 +0000, Steve Walker wrote:

The trouble with a bill is that MPs can propose amendments. Those
amendments could introduce all sorts of restrictions, extras,
etc. Indeed Labour tried to add on giving the vote to 16 and 17
year olds and millions of EU citizens resident in the UK - a form
of gerrymandering.

Rather a question of basic fairness. It's the EU citizen residents
and the 16/17 year olds that are most affected by Brexit.

But why should EU citizens have any say on what the UK does ?

On Fri, 1 Nov 2019 06:28:49 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

Well yes, harry, TNP, and co will be dead long before any benefits come
from brexit, if there are any.

That¢s another remoaner lie. There have already been
lots of EU citizens who have left, both because they
have stupidly decided they will be kicked out, because
they have decided that they arent wanted and because
the drop in the pound relative to the euro has made
working in the UK less attractive, particularly with
those from the best of the EU,.

Now guess, oh senile one, whether that is conducive to producing any
benefits, you retarded piece of senile Ozzie ****!

--
about senile Rot Speed:
"This is like having a conversation with someone with brain damage."
MID:

"dennis@home" wrote in message
...
On 31/10/2019 11:53, mechanic wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2019 22:31:21 +0000, Steve Walker wrote:

The trouble with a bill is that MPs can propose amendments. Those
amendments could introduce all sorts of restrictions, extras,
etc. Indeed Labour tried to add on giving the vote to 16 and 17
year olds and millions of EU citizens resident in the UK - a form
of gerrymandering.

Rather a question of basic fairness. It's the EU citizen residents
and the 16/17 year olds that are most affected by Brexit.


Well yes, harry, TNP, and co will be dead long before any benefits come
from brexit, if there are any.

Thats another remoaner lie. There have already been
lots of EU citizens who have left, both because they
have stupidly decided they will be kicked out, because
they have decided that they arent wanted and because
the drop in the pound relative to the euro has made
working in the UK less attractive, particularly with
those from the best of the EU,.

In article , "dennis@home"
writes
On 31/10/2019 11:53, mechanic wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2019 22:31:21 +0000, Steve Walker wrote:

The trouble with a bill is that MPs can propose amendments. Those
amendments could introduce all sorts of restrictions, extras,
etc. Indeed Labour tried to add on giving the vote to 16 and 17
year olds and millions of EU citizens resident in the UK - a form
of gerrymandering.
Rather a question of basic fairness. It's the EU citizen residents
and the 16/17 year olds that are most affected by Brexit.


Well yes, harry, TNP, and co will be dead long before any benefits come
from brexit, if there are any.

So why would they vote for Brexit? Surely then it's the young who will
benefit in the long term from Brexit.
As for EU citizens, they new the rules when they came here. But whinging
remainers and snowflakes always want to change the rules to suit
themselves.
--
bert