Ian Jackson wrote:
In message , MM
writes
On Wed, 04 Sep 2019 08:49:45 +0100, Keema's Nan
wrote:

On 4 Sep 2019, Roger wrote
(in ):

On Wednesday, September 4, 2019 at 1:06:07 AM UTC+2, MM wrote:
On Tue, 03 Sep 2019 15:33:11 +0100, Keema's Nan
wrote:

On 3 Sep 2019, Roger wrote
(in ):

On Tuesday, September 3, 2019 at 11:03:04 AM UTC+2, Keema's Nan wrote:
Yes. You are missing the whole point of the BoJo strategy;
as are many
others
like you.

Well I've talked about that elsewhere.

Here I am specifically adressing the case that Boris, in the case that
parliament forces the PM to request an extension, hands in his
resignation.

As far as I can see this does not automatically trigger an
election. If
the
PM resigns parliament must either vote or a general election (which
requires
a vote with a 2/3 majority), or they must appoint a new PM.

Corbyn says he is favour of an early election, and therefore
2/3rds should
be
no problem.

Ah, but Corbyn, quite rightly, doesn't trust Boris Johnson to stick to
the election date of, so far, 14 October. That's why Corbyn demanded
tonight that Royal Assent first be granted to the Bill that will have
been passed by the House of Commons AND the House of Lords. Only after
the RA is fact would Labour consider giving in to Boris's election
wish.

MM

Of course the fact that the Conservatives lead the polls with 10 points over
labour and rising has nothing to do with Corbyn imposing conditions that are
unlikely to be achieved


https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics...19/09/03/votin
g-intent
ion-con-35-lab-25-lib-dem-16-brex-11-

That was the situation yesterday evening...those figures would restore a con
majority without the DUP.

Those poll figures would also see Labour lose another 40 seats, and then be
100 behind the Tories.

Therefore Corbyn would have no alternative but to resign, and there would
have to be a leadership contest.

Who was it that mentioned Corbyn was playing a smart game?

He's playing a very smart game by not falling for Johnson's trickery
today.

You think so? It seems that we're increasingly no-deal Brexit-bound -

What on Earth makes you think that? The legislation being debated this
afternoon is almost certain to pass, and then be rushed through to the
statute books by early next week, so no deal will become illegal (at least
until end of January next year but the roll of the dice is that the
imminent election will mix things up well enough that something sensible
can finally be done with this dire ****show).

With regards to polling figures, kindly do try and remember the absolute
state of Labours numbers right up until 10pm on polling day when it was
shortly thereafter revealed that theyd more or less tied with the Tories.
In other words; dont believe their lies.

--
M0TEY // STC
www.twitter.com/ukradioamateur

On 4 Sep 2019, Stephen Cole wrote
(in article ):

Ian wrote:
In , MM
writes
On Wed, 04 Sep 2019 08:49:45 +0100, Keema's Nan
wrote:

On 4 Sep 2019, Roger wrote
(in ):

On Wednesday, September 4, 2019 at 1:06:07 AM UTC+2, MM wrote:
On Tue, 03 Sep 2019 15:33:11 +0100, Keema's Nan
wrote:

On 3 Sep 2019, Roger wrote
(in ):

On Tuesday, September 3, 2019 at 11:03:04 AM UTC+2, Keema's Nan wrote:
Yes. You are missing the whole point of the BoJo strategy;
as are many
others
like you.

Well I've talked about that elsewhere.

Here I am specifically adressing the case that Boris, in the case that
parliament forces the PM to request an extension, hands in his
resignation.

As far as I can see this does not automatically trigger an
election. If
the
PM resigns parliament must either vote or a general election (which
requires
a vote with a 2/3 majority), or they must appoint a new PM.

Corbyn says he is favour of an early election, and therefore
2/3rds should
be
no problem.

Ah, but Corbyn, quite rightly, doesn't trust Boris Johnson to stick to
the election date of, so far, 14 October. That's why Corbyn demanded
tonight that Royal Assent first be granted to the Bill that will have
been passed by the House of Commons AND the House of Lords. Only after
the RA is fact would Labour consider giving in to Boris's election
wish.

MM

Of course the fact that the Conservatives lead the polls with 10 points
over
labour and rising has nothing to do with Corbyn imposing conditions that
are
unlikely to be achieved


https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics...19/09/03/votin
g-intent
ion-con-35-lab-25-lib-dem-16-brex-11-

That was the situation yesterday evening...those figures would restore a
con
majority without the DUP.

Those poll figures would also see Labour lose another 40 seats, and then
be
100 behind the Tories.

Therefore Corbyn would have no alternative but to resign, and there would
have to be a leadership contest.

Who was it that mentioned Corbyn was playing a smart game?

He's playing a very smart game by not falling for Johnson's trickery
today.
You think so? It seems that we're increasingly no-deal Brexit-bound -

What on Earth makes you think that? The legislation being debated this
afternoon is almost certain to pass,

Only in the Commons.

The Lords are already well into filibustering so that the necessary
legislation will run out of time.

Im afraid you have counted your chickens far too early.

and then be rushed through to the
statute books by early next week, so no deal will become illegal (at least
until end of January next year but the roll of the dice is that the
imminent election will mix things up well enough that something sensible
can finally be done with this dire ****show).

With regards to polling figures, kindly do try and remember the absolute
state of Labours numbers right up until 10pm on polling day when it was
shortly thereafter revealed that theyd more or less tied with the Tories.
In other words; dont believe their lies.

On 04/09/2019 17:23, Keema's Nan wrote:
On 4 Sep 2019, Stephen Cole wrote
(in article ):

Ian wrote:
In , MM
writes
On Wed, 04 Sep 2019 08:49:45 +0100, Keema's Nan
wrote:

On 4 Sep 2019, Roger wrote
(in ):

On Wednesday, September 4, 2019 at 1:06:07 AM UTC+2, MM wrote:
On Tue, 03 Sep 2019 15:33:11 +0100, Keema's Nan
wrote:

On 3 Sep 2019, Roger wrote
(in ):

On Tuesday, September 3, 2019 at 11:03:04 AM UTC+2, Keema's Nan wrote:
Yes. You are missing the whole point of the BoJo strategy;
as are many
others
like you.

Well I've talked about that elsewhere.

Here I am specifically adressing the case that Boris, in the case that
parliament forces the PM to request an extension, hands in his
resignation.

As far as I can see this does not automatically trigger an
election. If
the
PM resigns parliament must either vote or a general election (which
requires
a vote with a 2/3 majority), or they must appoint a new PM.

Corbyn says he is favour of an early election, and therefore
2/3rds should
be
no problem.

Ah, but Corbyn, quite rightly, doesn't trust Boris Johnson to stick to
the election date of, so far, 14 October. That's why Corbyn demanded
tonight that Royal Assent first be granted to the Bill that will have
been passed by the House of Commons AND the House of Lords. Only after
the RA is fact would Labour consider giving in to Boris's election
wish.

MM

Of course the fact that the Conservatives lead the polls with 10 points
over
labour and rising has nothing to do with Corbyn imposing conditions that
are
unlikely to be achieved


https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics...19/09/03/votin
g-intent
ion-con-35-lab-25-lib-dem-16-brex-11-

That was the situation yesterday evening...those figures would restore a
con
majority without the DUP.

Those poll figures would also see Labour lose another 40 seats, and then
be
100 behind the Tories.

Therefore Corbyn would have no alternative but to resign, and there would
have to be a leadership contest.

Who was it that mentioned Corbyn was playing a smart game?

He's playing a very smart game by not falling for Johnson's trickery
today.
You think so? It seems that we're increasingly no-deal Brexit-bound -

What on Earth makes you think that? The legislation being debated this
afternoon is almost certain to pass,

Only in the Commons.

The Lords are already well into filibustering so that the necessary
legislation will run out of time.

Im afraid you have counted your chickens far too early.

Steve is just attention seeking.

If he was so confident, he won't need to make up all these fantasies.

Boris has got this all planned out - he's cut off every one of Corbyn's
options. True, the one Corbyn is currently going for is going to be the
most controversial but Boris has a plan for it which was been used before.

"Stephen Cole" wrote in message
...
Ian Jackson wrote:
In message , MM
writes
On Wed, 04 Sep 2019 08:49:45 +0100, Keema's Nan
wrote:

On 4 Sep 2019, Roger wrote
(in ):

On Wednesday, September 4, 2019 at 1:06:07 AM UTC+2, MM wrote:
On Tue, 03 Sep 2019 15:33:11 +0100, Keema's Nan
wrote:

On 3 Sep 2019, Roger wrote
(in ):

On Tuesday, September 3, 2019 at 11:03:04 AM UTC+2, Keema's Nan
wrote:
Yes. You are missing the whole point of the BoJo strategy;
as are many
others
like you.

Well I've talked about that elsewhere.

Here I am specifically adressing the case that Boris, in the case
that
parliament forces the PM to request an extension, hands in his
resignation.

As far as I can see this does not automatically trigger an
election. If
the
PM resigns parliament must either vote or a general election (which
requires
a vote with a 2/3 majority), or they must appoint a new PM.

Corbyn says he is favour of an early election, and therefore
2/3rds should
be
no problem.

Ah, but Corbyn, quite rightly, doesn't trust Boris Johnson to stick
to
the election date of, so far, 14 October. That's why Corbyn demanded
tonight that Royal Assent first be granted to the Bill that will have
been passed by the House of Commons AND the House of Lords. Only
after
the RA is fact would Labour consider giving in to Boris's election
wish.

MM

Of course the fact that the Conservatives lead the polls with 10
points over
labour and rising has nothing to do with Corbyn imposing conditions
that are
unlikely to be achieved


https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics...19/09/03/votin
g-intent
ion-con-35-lab-25-lib-dem-16-brex-11-

That was the situation yesterday evening...those figures would restore
a con
majority without the DUP.

Those poll figures would also see Labour lose another 40 seats, and
then be
100 behind the Tories.

Therefore Corbyn would have no alternative but to resign, and there
would
have to be a leadership contest.

Who was it that mentioned Corbyn was playing a smart game?

He's playing a very smart game by not falling for Johnson's trickery
today.

You think so? It seems that we're increasingly no-deal Brexit-bound -

What on Earth makes you think that? The legislation being debated this
afternoon is almost certain to pass, and then be rushed through to the
statute books by early next week, so no deal will become illegal

But its not possible for any UK legislation to override the
provisions of Article 50 that its a no deal brexit without
parliament accepting what the EU offers.

The only UK legislation that can do that is revoking Article 50 and
there is no evidence that the current parliament will do that this week.

(at least until end of January next year but the roll of the dice is that
the imminent election will mix things up well enough that something
sensible can finally be done with this dire ****show).

Its far from clear that there will be a general election before an automatic
Article 50 no deal brexit.

With regards to polling figures, kindly do try and remember the absolute
state of Labours numbers right up until 10pm on polling day when it was
shortly thereafter revealed that theyd more or less tied with the Tories.
In other words; dont believe their lies.

Not lies so much as difficult to poll accurately.

On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 06:09:31 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:


But its not possible for any UK legislation

"UK legislation"? NONE of yours, senile Ozzie cretin!

--
The Natural Philosopher about senile Rot:
"Rod speed is not a Brexiteer. He is an Australian troll and arsehole."
Message-ID:

You believe the polls? Ho ho, most people lie.
Brian

--
----- --
This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
The Sofa of Brian Gaff...

Blind user, so no pictures please
Note this Signature is meaningless.!
"Keema's Nan" wrote in message
news.com...
On 4 Sep 2019, Stephen Cole wrote
(in article ):

Ian wrote:
In , MM
writes
On Wed, 04 Sep 2019 08:49:45 +0100, Keema's Nan
wrote:

On 4 Sep 2019, Roger wrote
(in
):

On Wednesday, September 4, 2019 at 1:06:07 AM UTC+2, MM wrote:
On Tue, 03 Sep 2019 15:33:11 +0100, Keema's Nan
wrote:

On 3 Sep 2019, Roger wrote
(in
):

On Tuesday, September 3, 2019 at 11:03:04 AM UTC+2, Keema's
Nan wrote:
Yes. You are missing the whole point of the BoJo
strategy;
as are many
others
like you.

Well I've talked about that elsewhere.

Here I am specifically adressing the case that Boris, in
the case that
parliament forces the PM to request an extension, hands in
his
resignation.

As far as I can see this does not automatically trigger an
election. If
the
PM resigns parliament must either vote or a general
election (which
requires
a vote with a 2/3 majority), or they must appoint a new PM.

Corbyn says he is favour of an early election, and therefore
2/3rds should
be
no problem.

Ah, but Corbyn, quite rightly, doesn't trust Boris Johnson to
stick to
the election date of, so far, 14 October. That's why Corbyn
demanded
tonight that Royal Assent first be granted to the Bill that
will have
been passed by the House of Commons AND the House of Lords.
Only after
the RA is fact would Labour consider giving in to Boris's
election
wish.

MM

Of course the fact that the Conservatives lead the polls with 10
points
over
labour and rising has nothing to do with Corbyn imposing
conditions that
are
unlikely to be achieved


https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics...19/09/03/votin
g-intent
ion-con-35-lab-25-lib-dem-16-brex-11-

That was the situation yesterday evening...those figures would
restore a
con
majority without the DUP.

Those poll figures would also see Labour lose another 40 seats, and
then
be
100 behind the Tories.

Therefore Corbyn would have no alternative but to resign, and there
would
have to be a leadership contest.

Who was it that mentioned Corbyn was playing a smart game?

He's playing a very smart game by not falling for Johnson's trickery
today.
You think so? It seems that we're increasingly no-deal Brexit-bound -

What on Earth makes you think that? The legislation being debated this
afternoon is almost certain to pass,

Only in the Commons.

The Lords are already well into filibustering so that the necessary
legislation will run out of time.

I'm afraid you have counted your chickens far too early.

and then be rushed through to the
statute books by early next week, so no deal will become illegal (at
least
until end of January next year but the roll of the dice is that the
imminent election will mix things up well enough that something sensible
can finally be done with this dire ****show).

With regards to polling figures, kindly do try and remember the absolute
state of Labour's numbers right up until 10pm on polling day when it was
shortly thereafter revealed that they'd more or less tied with the
Tories.
In other words; don't believe their lies.

On Wed, 04 Sep 2019 17:23:03 +0100, Keema's Nan wrote:

Only in the Commons.

The Lords are already well into filibustering so that the necessary
legislation will run out of time.

Im afraid you have counted your chickens far too early.

I'm afraid you did. See today's news.

--
My posts are my copyright and if @diy_forums or Home Owners' Hub
wish to copy them they can pay me £1 a message.
Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org
*lightning surge protection* - a w_tom conductor

On 05/09/2019 09:00, Bob Eager wrote:
On Wed, 04 Sep 2019 17:23:03 +0100, Keema's Nan wrote:

Only in the Commons.

The Lords are already well into filibustering so that the necessary
legislation will run out of time.

Im afraid you have counted your chickens far too early.

I'm afraid you did. See today's news.

Yup. Its now not just parliament versus the people its parliament versus
the government as well.

And no pretence of democracy whatsoever.
Peoples vote? Only if we wont lose it eh?


--
"A point of view can be a dangerous luxury when substituted for insight
and understanding".

Marshall McLuhan

MM wrote:
On Wed, 4 Sep 2019 17:54:21 +0100, Brian Reay wrote:

On 04/09/2019 17:23, Keema's Nan wrote:
On 4 Sep 2019, Stephen Cole wrote
(in article ):

Ian wrote:
In , MM
writes
On Wed, 04 Sep 2019 08:49:45 +0100, Keema's Nan
wrote:

On 4 Sep 2019, Roger wrote
(in ):

On Wednesday, September 4, 2019 at 1:06:07 AM UTC+2, MM wrote:
On Tue, 03 Sep 2019 15:33:11 +0100, Keema's Nan
wrote:

On 3 Sep 2019, Roger wrote
(in ):

On Tuesday, September 3, 2019 at 11:03:04 AM UTC+2, Keema's Nan wrote:
Yes. You are missing the whole point of the BoJo strategy;
as are many
others
like you.

Well I've talked about that elsewhere.

Here I am specifically adressing the case that Boris, in the case that
parliament forces the PM to request an extension, hands in his
resignation.

As far as I can see this does not automatically trigger an
election. If
the
PM resigns parliament must either vote or a general election (which
requires
a vote with a 2/3 majority), or they must appoint a new PM.

Corbyn says he is favour of an early election, and therefore
2/3rds should
be
no problem.

Ah, but Corbyn, quite rightly, doesn't trust Boris Johnson to stick to
the election date of, so far, 14 October. That's why Corbyn demanded
tonight that Royal Assent first be granted to the Bill that will have
been passed by the House of Commons AND the House of Lords. Only after
the RA is fact would Labour consider giving in to Boris's election
wish.

MM

Of course the fact that the Conservatives lead the polls with 10 points
over
labour and rising has nothing to do with Corbyn imposing conditions that
are
unlikely to be achieved


https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics...19/09/03/votin
g-intent
ion-con-35-lab-25-lib-dem-16-brex-11-

That was the situation yesterday evening...those figures would restore a
con
majority without the DUP.

Those poll figures would also see Labour lose another 40 seats, and then
be
100 behind the Tories.

Therefore Corbyn would have no alternative but to resign, and there would
have to be a leadership contest.

Who was it that mentioned Corbyn was playing a smart game?

He's playing a very smart game by not falling for Johnson's trickery
today.
You think so? It seems that we're increasingly no-deal Brexit-bound -

What on Earth makes you think that? The legislation being debated this
afternoon is almost certain to pass,

Only in the Commons.

The Lords are already well into filibustering so that the necessary
legislation will run out of time.

IÂ’m afraid you have counted your chickens far too early.

Steve is just attention seeking.

If he was so confident, he won't need to make up all these fantasies.

Boris has got this all planned out - he's cut off every one of Corbyn's
options. True, the one Corbyn is currently going for is going to be the
most controversial but Boris has a plan for it which was been used before.

He hasn't cut any of Corbyn's options! It is *Boris* who is the lame
duck now, as Parliament trashes his attempt to get a general election
after the Tories in the House of Lords abandoned their planned
filibuster earlier today.

The Bill will become law on Monday.

Every single prediction Brian has made over the last 3 years has quickly
been proven to be massively wrong. Hes got absolutely atrocious political
instincts.

--
M0TEY // STC
www.twitter.com/ukradioamateur

On 5 Sep 2019 08:52:46 GMT, Stephen Cole
wrote:

MM wrote:
On Wed, 4 Sep 2019 17:54:21 +0100, Brian Reay wrote:

On 04/09/2019 17:23, Keema's Nan wrote:
On 4 Sep 2019, Stephen Cole wrote
(in article ):

Ian wrote:
In , MM
writes
On Wed, 04 Sep 2019 08:49:45 +0100, Keema's Nan
wrote:

On 4 Sep 2019, Roger wrote
(in ):

On Wednesday, September 4, 2019 at 1:06:07 AM UTC+2, MM wrote:
On Tue, 03 Sep 2019 15:33:11 +0100, Keema's Nan
wrote:

On 3 Sep 2019, Roger wrote
(in ):

On Tuesday, September 3, 2019 at 11:03:04 AM UTC+2, Keema's Nan wrote:
Yes. You are missing the whole point of the BoJo strategy;
as are many
others
like you.

Well I've talked about that elsewhere.

Here I am specifically adressing the case that Boris, in the case that
parliament forces the PM to request an extension, hands in his
resignation.

As far as I can see this does not automatically trigger an
election. If
the
PM resigns parliament must either vote or a general election (which
requires
a vote with a 2/3 majority), or they must appoint a new PM.

Corbyn says he is favour of an early election, and therefore
2/3rds should
be
no problem.

Ah, but Corbyn, quite rightly, doesn't trust Boris Johnson to stick to
the election date of, so far, 14 October. That's why Corbyn demanded
tonight that Royal Assent first be granted to the Bill that will have
been passed by the House of Commons AND the House of Lords. Only after
the RA is fact would Labour consider giving in to Boris's election
wish.

MM

Of course the fact that the Conservatives lead the polls with 10 points
over
labour and rising has nothing to do with Corbyn imposing conditions that
are
unlikely to be achieved


https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics...19/09/03/votin
g-intent
ion-con-35-lab-25-lib-dem-16-brex-11-

That was the situation yesterday evening...those figures would restore a
con
majority without the DUP.

Those poll figures would also see Labour lose another 40 seats, and then
be
100 behind the Tories.

Therefore Corbyn would have no alternative but to resign, and there would
have to be a leadership contest.

Who was it that mentioned Corbyn was playing a smart game?

He's playing a very smart game by not falling for Johnson's trickery
today.
You think so? It seems that we're increasingly no-deal Brexit-bound -

What on Earth makes you think that? The legislation being debated this
afternoon is almost certain to pass,

Only in the Commons.

The Lords are already well into filibustering so that the necessary
legislation will run out of time.

I?m afraid you have counted your chickens far too early.

Steve is just attention seeking.

If he was so confident, he won't need to make up all these fantasies.

Boris has got this all planned out - he's cut off every one of Corbyn's
options. True, the one Corbyn is currently going for is going to be the
most controversial but Boris has a plan for it which was been used before.

He hasn't cut any of Corbyn's options! It is *Boris* who is the lame
duck now, as Parliament trashes his attempt to get a general election
after the Tories in the House of Lords abandoned their planned
filibuster earlier today.

The Bill will become law on Monday.

Every single prediction Brian has made over the last 3 years has quickly
been proven to be massively wrong. He’s got absolutely atrocious political
instincts.

Would you expect anything less from the Basingtoke Gazette's political
correspondant?

Pamela wrote:

Every single prediction Brian has made over the last 3 years has quickly
been proven to be massively wrong. Hes got absolutely atrocious
political instincts.

Would you expect anything less from the Basingtoke Gazette's political
correspondant?

last time I saw Basingstoke it was like a giant housing estate with too
many roundabouts and dual carriageways. Sorry to be such a snob but the
better class of people who work there live in Winchester or somewhere
similar nearby but never in Basingstoke proper.



It was a reasonably ordinary Hampshire town till it was unfortunately
chosen to be a London overspill location and the dross from East London
Council estates sent there approximately 55 years ago which swamped it
,given the propensity of such people to replicate themselves amongst the
same circle of acquaintances as they reach 14 we are nearly on the the 4th
wave of inbreds .
At least Andover which suffered a similar fate had the squaddies from the
camps on Salisbury plain visiting on a night out to provide some different
genes when they inseminated the underage schoolgirls though the result has
lead to quite a few illegitimate thugs over the years.


GH

In article .com,
Keema's Nan wrote:
What on Earth makes you think that? The legislation being debated this
afternoon is almost certain to pass,

Only in the Commons.

The Lords are already well into filibustering so that the necessary
legislation will run out of time.

I‘m afraid you have counted your chickens far too early.

Tee-hee. Yet another Brexiteer's crystal ball shatters.

--
*I speak fluent patriarchy but it's not my mother tongue

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Pamela wrote:
On 21:22 6 Sep 2019, Marland wrote:

last time I saw Basingstoke it was like a giant housing estate with too
many roundabouts and dual carriageways. Sorry to be such a snob but the
better class of people who work there live in Winchester or somewhere
similar nearby but never in Basingstoke proper.



It was a reasonably ordinary Hampshire town till it was unfortunately
chosen to be a London overspill location and the dross from East London
Council estates sent there approximately 55 years ago which swamped it
,given the propensity of such people to replicate themselves amongst the
same circle of acquaintances as they reach 14 we are nearly on the the 4th
wave of inbreds .

I hadn't realise there was an influx of residents from East London to
basingstoke. I knew a friend who lived on the charmless Deepdene Estate and
it always seemed very characterless and with more chavs than normal. Best
thing about Basingstoke are the fast roads out of it.

To be fair it is probably getting better nowadays compared to about 30
years ago when I went there for work purposes a couple of times a week.

Hampshire CC located their milestone museum there which is a collection of
artefacts and displays from the counties industrial and social past , it
is no Beamish or Blackcountry Museum but is a good effort nevertheless.
https://www.milestonesmuseum.org.uk

Basing house on the outskirts is pleasant enough to visit if you like old
buildings and gardens.
https://www.hampshireculture.org.uk/basing-house

GH

On 07/09/2019 13:30, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article .com,
Keema's Nan wrote:

What on Earth makes you think that? The legislation being debated this
afternoon is almost certain to pass,

Only in the Commons.

The Lords are already well into filibustering so that the necessary
legislation will run out of time.

I€˜m afraid you have counted your chickens far too early.

Tee-hee. Yet another Brexiteer's crystal ball shatters.

Prophecy is so easy with hindsight, isn't it?

But it's not a lot of use.

In article ,
Norman Wells wrote:
On 07/09/2019 13:30, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article .com,
Keema's Nan wrote:

What on Earth makes you think that? The legislation being debated this
afternoon is almost certain to pass,

Only in the Commons.

The Lords are already well into filibustering so that the necessary
legislation will run out of time.

I�m afraid you have counted your chickens far too early.

Tee-hee. Yet another Brexiteer's crystal ball shatters.

Prophecy is so easy with hindsight, isn't it?

But it's not a lot of use.

Prophecy based on a crystal ball - the Brexiteer standard - never is.

--
*I got a job at a bakery because I kneaded dough.*

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.