Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
OT. May's cunning plan becomes apparent.
On 09/12/2018 12:58, NY wrote:
"T i m" wrote in message ... There will be two options, May's Rubbish Deal or Remain. Proper leave will not be there. I think a second referendum is needed, now we can see the deal that is available and the implications of it. It's information which if it had been available at the time of the referendum may have affected the result - it was always a leap of faith having to choose an option whose implications were not known, only guessed, and guessed wrongly. I voted for Leave, because I passionately believe that the EU is up to no good and puts the interests of itself before the interests of its member countries. Merkel's statement a few weeks ago saying the countries should welcome the EU taking over some of the member countries' sovereignty is scary as hell and makes me glad I voted the way I did. I'm still very much pro Europe - but that's pro-EEC, because the trade alliance without loss of sovereignty and without freedom of movement of *all* EU members (we cannot choose which countries we admit people from), that's what we voted to join in 1974. Maastricht has a lot to answer for. My fear if we vote for Remain a second time round is that we will be in a worse position in the EU than if we'd not voted initially to Leave, and we'll get even more EU **** than we have already. One thing is certain: whatever deal we end up with, within or outside the EU, we will be a lot worse off. The EU should have made it easier for countries to leave without being financially punished for doing so, and should have allowed a trade-agreement-only half-way house that does not require use to pay a "membership fee" or give us "voting rights" but still treats us as an equal for trading. In a way it's a shame that the Republic of Ireland didn't vote to leave the EU as well, because that would have avoided the problems with a land border between non-EU UK and EU Ireland. It's a good thing that the Scotland devolution referendum didn't go the other way, otherwise there would have potentially been problems at the Scotland/England border if Scotland as a separate nation had voted to stay in the EU. Give NI to Irish republic, give Gibraltar to Spain, there we have it - a solution. |
#2
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
OT. May's cunning plan becomes apparent.
On 12/12/2018 19:32, critcher wrote:
On 09/12/2018 12:58, NY wrote: "T i m" wrote in message ... There will be two options, May's Rubbish Deal or Remain. Proper leave will not be there. I think a second referendum is needed, now we can see the deal that is available and the implications of it. It's information which if it had been available at the time of the referendum may have affected the result - it was always a leap of faith having to choose an option whose implications were not known, only guessed, and guessed wrongly. I voted for Leave, because I passionately believe that the EU is up to no good and puts the interests of itself before the interests of its member countries. Merkel's statement a few weeks ago saying the countries should welcome the EU taking over some of the member countries' sovereignty is scary as hell and makes me glad I voted the way I did. I'm still very much pro Europe - but that's pro-EEC, because the trade alliance without loss of sovereignty and without freedom of movement of *all* EU members (we cannot choose which countries we admit people from), that's what we voted to join in 1974. Maastricht has a lot to answer for. My fear if we vote for Remain a second time round is that we will be in a worse position in the EU than if we'd not voted initially to Leave, and we'll get even more EU **** than we have already. One thing is certain: whatever deal we end up with, within or outside the EU, we will be a lot worse off. The EU should have made it easier for countries to leave without being financially punished for doing so, and should have allowed a trade-agreement-only half-way house that does not require use to pay a "membership fee" or give us "voting rights" but still treats us as an equal for trading. In a way it's a shame that the Republic of Ireland didn't vote to leave the EU as well, because that would have avoided the problems with a land border between non-EU UK and EU Ireland. It's a good thing that the Scotland devolution referendum didn't go the other way, otherwise there would have potentially been problems at the Scotland/England border if Scotland as a separate nation had voted to stay in the EU. Give NI to Irish republic, give Gibraltar to Spain, there we have it - a solution. I would have no problem with NI becoming part of the Republic or being independent - as long as that was what the majority of the population wanted. Up to now though, the majority has been firmly for staying as part of the UK. SteveW |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT. May's cunning plan becomes apparent. | UK diy | |||
OT. May's cunning plan becomes apparent. | UK diy | |||
OT. May's cunning plan becomes apparent. | UK diy |