Went out to buy another 250ml tin yesterday and paid £5.99 for it.

When I got home I noticed that the previous tin still had its
price sticker - £9.49 and I think it was bought at the same store
or another branch of same store about 3 years ago.

Perhaps the almost-used tin was mis-priced in the first place,
or have Bostic fiddled with the content ?.

Since it uses very strong solvents, I wonder how they cope with
VOC2010 anyway ?. The wording on the tin hasn't changed, but has
slightly different warning symbols for inflammable etc.

Andrew wrote:

Since it uses very strong solvents, I wonder how they cope with
VOC2010 anyway ?. The wording on the tin hasn't changed, but has
slightly different warning symbols for inflammable etc.

I think the "glue-sniffer" version containing Toluene was withdrawn from
sale to joe public years ago. The main solvents in modern Bostik seem
to be Xylene and Ethyl Acetate.

In article ,
Andrew wrote:
Went out to buy another 250ml tin yesterday and paid £5.99 for it.

When I got home I noticed that the previous tin still had its
price sticker - £9.49 and I think it was bought at the same store
or another branch of same store about 3 years ago.

Perhaps the almost-used tin was mis-priced in the first place,
or have Bostic fiddled with the content ?.

Since it uses very strong solvents, I wonder how they cope with
VOC2010 anyway ?. The wording on the tin hasn't changed, but has
slightly different warning symbols for inflammable etc.

Does it perform as well as the older stuff? Evostik doesn't seem to since
the solvent change.

--
*The most wasted day of all is one in which we have not laughed.*

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Dave Plowman (News) wrote:

Does it perform as well as the older stuff?

IME yes it does, maybe with a bit of a thinner snot-like consistency ...

Yes Evo stik is rubbish but still pongs.
Brian

--
----- -
This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
The Sofa of Brian Gaff...

Blind user, so no pictures please!
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Andrew wrote:
Went out to buy another 250ml tin yesterday and paid £5.99 for it.

When I got home I noticed that the previous tin still had its
price sticker - £9.49 and I think it was bought at the same store
or another branch of same store about 3 years ago.

Perhaps the almost-used tin was mis-priced in the first place,
or have Bostic fiddled with the content ?.

Since it uses very strong solvents, I wonder how they cope with
VOC2010 anyway ?. The wording on the tin hasn't changed, but has
slightly different warning symbols for inflammable etc.

Does it perform as well as the older stuff? Evostik doesn't seem to since
the solvent change.

--
*The most wasted day of all is one in which we have not laughed.*

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

In article ,
Andy Burns wrote:
Dave Plowman (News) wrote:

Does it perform as well as the older stuff?

IME yes it does, maybe with a bit of a thinner snot-like consistency ...

Good to know. I need some contact adhesive for a job I'd once have used
Evostik for, so I'll try it.

--
*Never test the depth of the water with both feet.*

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.