Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y,u.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello,
Every year I say I am going to get a new mower but never get round to it, but I feel the time has come! I currently have a Bosch electric mower that I have had since 2001. It says it has an induction motor and I don't know if that's the problem. Are these the wrong type of motors for mowers? It means it is quieter than other mowers but it is always stalling. The blade curves up at the end and is supposed to eject the cuttings into a box but this never works. I thought it was because the grass was damp that it stuck together but even now when we have had all this sunshine, the mower clogs and the motor stalls. Would a petrol mower be less likely to stall or clog? I've never had one before. I like the freedom of not having any wires. I have a front garden that does not have a lawn yet but I'm not sure what else to do with it so it may get turfed! It is roughly 10'6" x 14'8" or 3.2m x 4.5m The main use however would be for the back garden 18' x 41' or 5.5m x 12m approx. Though I will probably put raised beds, greenhouse, etc onto some of this in the future. I know Honda is well thought of for small petrol engines. I see they do two "Izy" models: one is 16" and the other 18". From what I can tell, they use the same engine. I was looking at ones that propelled themselves to make it easier for me. It looks as though they only have one speed: is that an issue? The larger mower is slightly slower but I'm guessing that is because it weighs slightly more. The larger mower costs £100 more. Is it really worth it for an extra two inches? If I have done my sums right, for my garden I would have to go up it 13 times with the 16" and 12 times with the 18", so it wouldn't save me much time. Perhaps I should save money and buy the smaller model? Either one is wider than my current electric one. Thanks, Stephen. |
#2
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y,u.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 31/05/18 12:24, Stephen wrote:
Hello, Every year I say I am going to get a new mower but never get round to it, but I feel the time has come! I currently have a Bosch electric mower that I have had since 2001. It says it has an induction motor and I don't know if that's the problem. Are these the wrong type of motors for mowers? It means it is quieter than other mowers but it is always stalling. The blade curves up at the end and is supposed to eject the cuttings into a box but this never works. I thought it was because the grass was damp that it stuck together but even now when we have had all this sunshine, the mower clogs and the motor stalls. I know you said petrol, but I have one of the Bosch 36V Rotak mowers (about 3 years old now) and I've been very impressed. It does collect the grass extremely well and is surprisingly powerful. The main thing is you need 2 batteries really, so you can swap back and forth for a larger lawn. It replaced a petrol Hayter of similar cut width and it's lighter, no mains cord, and not bothered about side slopes (was always upsetting the Hayter doing those). Would a petrol mower be less likely to stall or clog? I've never had one before. I like the freedom of not having any wires. I have a front garden that does not have a lawn yet but I'm not sure what else to do with it so it may get turfed! It is roughly 10'6" x 14'8" or 3.2m x 4.5m The main use however would be for the back garden 18' x 41' or 5.5m x 12m approx. Though I will probably put raised beds, greenhouse, etc onto some of this in the future. I know Honda is well thought of for small petrol engines. I see they do two "Izy" models: one is 16" and the other 18". From what I can tell, they use the same engine. I was looking at ones that propelled themselves to make it easier for me. It looks as though they only have one speed: is that an issue? The larger mower is slightly slower but I'm guessing that is because it weighs slightly more. The larger mower costs £100 more. Is it really worth it for an extra two inches? If I have done my sums right, for my garden I would have to go up it 13 times with the 16" and 12 times with the 18", so it wouldn't save me much time. Perhaps I should save money and buy the smaller model? Either one is wider than my current electric one. Thanks, Stephen. |
#3
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y,u.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stephen used his keyboard to write :
Would a petrol mower be less likely to stall or clog? I've never had one before. I like the freedom of not having any wires. Unless the grass is very dried out, they all do clog up. I have a tractor/mower, which uses a duct from the cutting deck, to a massive collector bag hooked onto the rear. That clogs up to the point where I gave up on collecting it because the duct would choke up so very often. I just mulch it back onto the soil now and carry a stick to poke the duct clear when it chokes. Process is cut, then go around a second time to mulch it, it takes 30 minutes to fly round, once I have gained control of it after the winter and it has dried out enough to drive upon. |
#4
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y,u.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 31/05/18 12:52, Harry Bloomfield wrote:
Stephen used his keyboard to write : Would a petrol mower be less likely to stall or clog? I've never had one before. I like the freedom of not having any wires. Unless the grass is very dried out, they all do clog up. I have a tractor/mower, which uses a duct from the cutting deck, to a massive collector bag hooked onto the rear. That clogs up to the point where I gave up on collecting it because the duct would choke up so very often. I just mulch it back onto the soil now and carry a stick to poke the duct clear when it chokes. Process is cut, then go around a second time to mulch it, it takes 30 minutes to fly round, once I have gained control of it after the winter and it has dried out enough to drive upon. +1 -- Labour - a bunch of rich people convincing poor people to vote for rich people by telling poor people that "other" rich people are the reason they are poor. Peter Thompson |
#5
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y,u.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 31 May 2018 12:24:47 +0100, Stephen wrote:
Hello, Every year I say I am going to get a new mower but never get round to it, but I feel the time has come! I currently have a Bosch electric mower that I have had since 2001. It says it has an induction motor and I don't know if that's the problem. Are these the wrong type of motors for mowers? It means it is quieter than other mowers but it is always stalling. The blade curves up at the end and is supposed to eject the cuttings into a box but this never works. I thought it was because the grass was damp that it stuck together but even now when we have had all this sunshine, the mower clogs and the motor stalls. Would a petrol mower be less likely to stall or clog? I've never had one before. I like the freedom of not having any wires. I have a front garden that does not have a lawn yet but I'm not sure what else to do with it so it may get turfed! It is roughly 10'6" x 14'8" or 3.2m x 4.5m The main use however would be for the back garden 18' x 41' or 5.5m x 12m approx. Though I will probably put raised beds, greenhouse, etc onto some of this in the future. I know Honda is well thought of for small petrol engines. I see they do two "Izy" models: one is 16" and the other 18". From what I can tell, they use the same engine. I was looking at ones that propelled themselves to make it easier for me. It looks as though they only have one speed: is that an issue? The larger mower is slightly slower but I'm guessing that is because it weighs slightly more. The larger mower costs £100 more. Is it really worth it for an extra two inches? If I have done my sums right, for my garden I would have to go up it 13 times with the 16" and 12 times with the 18", so it wouldn't save me much time. Perhaps I should save money and buy the smaller model? Either one is wider than my current electric one. Thanks, Stephen. My Honda Izzy does tend to clog if the grass is damp and the cut is more than an inch or two off. I got the 16" because, as you say, it has the same motor and thus it should be less stressed. My gardens are a bit bumpy and have lots of things to get around, so the smaller one - and definitely not SP (I could see that it would take me along, with so any corners and curves) - seemed to be better. Now, when I used to cut the grass next door, I've had to 3 cuts at times. It is sports-pitch grass and grows fast an thick. The Honda would need 2 cuts if the grass was 4 - 5" long. The new neighbour bougt an electric mower form B&Q - a cheap Mac Allister IIRC, about £70. I wished him luck with that! I was right PO'd when it cut the grass with no trouble at all - it was about a quarter of the price of the Izzy. Only snag is the flex, especially round shrubs etc. -- Peter. The gods will stay away whilst religions hold sway |
#6
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 31 May 2018 13:46:12 +0100, PeterC
wrote: I got the 16" because, as you say, it has the same motor and thus it should be less stressed. That was my logic too. My gardens are a bit bumpy and have lots of things to get around, so the smaller one - and definitely not SP (I could see that it would take me along, with so any corners and curves) - seemed to be better. Daft question perhaps, but I've never had a self-propelled mower. Can it be used in non-self-propelled mode for the fiddly bits? |
#7
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 05/06/2018 22:26, Stephen wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2018 13:46:12 +0100, PeterC wrote: I got the 16" because, as you say, it has the same motor and thus it should be less stressed. That was my logic too. My gardens are a bit bumpy and have lots of things to get around, so the smaller one - and definitely not SP (I could see that it would take me along, with so any corners and curves) - seemed to be better. Daft question perhaps, but I've never had a self-propelled mower. Can it be used in non-self-propelled mode for the fiddly bits? Yes. With mine, there are two full-width controls, which pull to the handle, so that you can grip the handle and the control together. The top one needs to be held continuously and cuts the engine if you let go. The bottom one engages drive when pulled up and disengages when released. When drive is disengaged, the mower can be pushed and pulled freely. The blade spins continuously. SteveW |
#8
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Steve Walker
writes On 05/06/2018 22:26, Stephen wrote: Daft question perhaps, but I've never had a self-propelled mower. Can it be used in non-self-propelled mode for the fiddly bits? Yes. With mine, there are two full-width controls, which pull to the handle, so that you can grip the handle and the control together. The top one needs to be held continuously and cuts the engine if you let go. The bottom one engages drive when pulled up and disengages when released. When drive is disengaged, the mower can be pushed and pulled freely. The blade spins continuously. My Honda is identical. No throttle, choke etc., just the two controls as above. Starts easily, runs well and just does the job. My wife can, and does, start it and use it, and she is a pensioner and far from 'butch'. -- Graeme |
#9
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Graeme wrote:
In message , Steve Walker writes On 05/06/2018 22:26, Stephen wrote: Daft question perhaps, but I've never had a self-propelled mower. Can it be used in non-self-propelled mode for the fiddly bits? Yes. With mine, there are two full-width controls, which pull to the handle, so that you can grip the handle and the control together. The top one needs to be held continuously and cuts the engine if you let go. The bottom one engages drive when pulled up and disengages when released. When drive is disengaged, the mower can be pushed and pulled freely. The blade spins continuously. My Honda is identical. No throttle, choke etc., just the two controls as above. Starts easily, runs well and just does the job. My wife can, and does, start it and use it, and she is a pensioner and far from 'butch'. When did a nanny state €œdead mans handle€ become the norm on mowers? So glad mine doesnt have one. Fecking irritating things. Tim -- Please don't feed the trolls |
#10
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y,u.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stephen Wrote in message:
Hello, Every year I say I am going to get a new mower but never get round to it, but I feel the time has come! Just a couple of general points. I've had a 3.5hp Briggs and Stratton powered mower for about 25 years now. It was a Qualcast machine with GRP deck rather than metal. Apart from a small crack, the deck is in perfect condition and I think it's a much better material than steel (which will rot away). The engine seized once due to neglect (apparently the oil doesn't last forever) but a quick shot of oil down the plughole soon got it going again and it's been running perfectly since. So, B&S made good engines 25 years ago and plastic decks seem to be a good idea. Tim |
#11
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y,u.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 31/05/2018 15:06, Tim+ wrote:
Stephen Wrote in message: Hello, Every year I say I am going to get a new mower but never get round to it, but I feel the time has come! Just a couple of general points. I've had a 3.5hp Briggs and Stratton powered mower for about 25 years now. It was a Qualcast machine with GRP deck rather than metal. Apart from a small crack, the deck is in perfect condition and I think it's a much better material than steel (which will rot away). The engine seized once due to neglect (apparently the oil doesn't last forever) but a quick shot of oil down the plughole soon got it going again and it's been running perfectly since. Maybe I should change the oil in mine. I do find that my more modern petrol engines start very easily. My neighbour heard me trying to start my old flymo and asked me if I would like to borrow his grass cutter. The new flymo with a Honda engine always starts very easily. Maybe the OP should consider one of the new automatic mowers. If you use them often you avoid the cut grass disposal problem. Has anyone tried one of these? -- Michael Chare |
#12
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y,u.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 31 May 2018 15:40:48 +0100, Michael Chare
wrote: Maybe the OP should consider one of the new automatic mowers. If you use them often you avoid the cut grass disposal problem. Has anyone tried one of these? The robots? They sound wonderful, just like robot vacuums do, but I think they're expensive aren't they? |
#13
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, May 31, 2018 at 3:06:18 PM UTC+1, Tim+ wrote:
Stephen Wrote in message: Hello, Every year I say I am going to get a new mower but never get round to it, but I feel the time has come! Just a couple of general points. I've had a 3.5hp Briggs and Stratton powered mower for about 25 years now. It was a Qualcast machine with GRP deck rather than metal. Apart from a small crack, the deck is in perfect condition and I think it's a much better material than steel (which will rot away). The engine seized once due to neglect (apparently the oil doesn't last forever) but a quick shot of oil down the plughole soon got it going again and it's been running perfectly since. So, B&S made good engines 25 years ago and plastic decks seem to be a good idea. I had a Husqvarna Royal something-or-other with a plastic body and B&S engine, only problem I had is a snapped starter cord. Insurance coughed up for a replacement, similar model but now a metal body which seems like a retrograde step as I can see bubbles of rust forming under the paint. Still a B&S engine which thrives on neglect, thankfully (and shamefully). |
#14
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Halmyre brought next idea :
I had a Husqvarna Royal something-or-other with a plastic body and B&S engine, only problem I had is a snapped starter cord. Insurance coughed up for a replacement, similar model but now a metal body which seems like a retrograde step as I can see bubbles of rust forming under the paint. Still a B&S engine which thrives on neglect, thankfully (and shamefully). Insurance paid for a replacement, due to a snapped pull cord - surely that is simple wear and tear? Also an easy DIY repair. |
#15
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, June 1, 2018 at 9:13:05 AM UTC+1, Harry Bloomfield wrote:
Halmyre brought next idea : I had a Husqvarna Royal something-or-other with a plastic body and B&S engine, only problem I had is a snapped starter cord. Insurance coughed up for a replacement, similar model but now a metal body which seems like a retrograde step as I can see bubbles of rust forming under the paint. Still a B&S engine which thrives on neglect, thankfully (and shamefully). Insurance paid for a replacement, due to a snapped pull cord - surely that is simple wear and tear? Also an easy DIY repair. Sorry - brain fade; I forgot to mention it was stolen, post-cord-replacement. |
#16
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 31 May 2018 12:24:47 +0100, Stephen wrote:
Hello, Every year I say I am going to get a new mower but never get round to it, but I feel the time has come! I currently have a Bosch electric mower that I have had since 2001. It says it has an induction motor and I don't know if that's the problem. Are these the wrong type of motors for mowers? It means it is quieter than other mowers but it is always stalling. The blade curves up at the end and is supposed to eject the cuttings into a box but this never works. I thought it was because the grass was damp that it stuck together but even now when we have had all this sunshine, the mower clogs and the motor stalls. Would a petrol mower be less likely to stall or clog? I've never had one before. I like the freedom of not having any wires. I have a front garden that does not have a lawn yet but I'm not sure what else to do with it so it may get turfed! It is roughly 10'6" x 14'8" or 3.2m x 4.5m The main use however would be for the back garden 18' x 41' or 5.5m x 12m approx. Though I will probably put raised beds, greenhouse, etc onto some of this in the future. I know Honda is well thought of for small petrol engines. I see they do two "Izy" models: one is 16" and the other 18". From what I can tell, they use the same engine. I was looking at ones that propelled themselves to make it easier for me. It looks as though they only have one speed: is that an issue? The larger mower is slightly slower but I'm guessing that is because it weighs slightly more. The larger mower costs £100 more. Is it really worth it for an extra two inches? If I have done my sums right, for my garden I would have to go up it 13 times with the 16" and 12 times with the 18", so it wouldn't save me much time. Perhaps I should save money and buy the smaller model? Either one is wider than my current electric one. Thanks, Stephen. We have a Bosch Rotak and it seems to be fine, although we currently only have a small lawn. I don't know if you just had a bad example. Best mower we have had was a Harry (no longer made) which had an alloy deck and a Briggs & Stratton engine. Generally abused and ignored and it always seemed to start and cut well. I have found the electric mower to be much easier than petrol, though. Cheers Dave R -- AMD FX-6300 in GA-990X-Gaming SLI-CF running Windows 7 Pro x64 --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
#17
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 31/05/2018 17:40, David wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2018 12:24:47 +0100, Stephen wrote: Hello, Every year I say I am going to get a new mower but never get round to it, but I feel the time has come! I currently have a Bosch electric mower that I have had since 2001. It says it has an induction motor and I don't know if that's the problem. Are these the wrong type of motors for mowers? It means it is quieter than other mowers but it is always stalling. Odd. I have used both sorts and never had an electric one stall on me. The blade curves up at the end and is supposed to eject the cuttings into a box but this never works. I thought it was because the grass was damp that it stuck together but even now when we have had all this sunshine, the mower clogs and the motor stalls. How strange. the air flow should be sufficient to blow stuff into the bag or whatever collection method it uses. Have you tried cleaning the bag that the grass cuttings go into? If air can't get out then there will not be enough air flow to carry the grass cuttings along. Would a petrol mower be less likely to stall or clog? I've never had one before. I like the freedom of not having any wires. Mine is a Mountfield 18" petrol with 135cc Honda engine. It is my second in three decades used to cut about 1/3 acre all summer long. Its predecessor fell apart after 20 years due to petrol spills and general wear and tear. It has only stalled on me when I tried to cut a flagstone or edging with it and even then it sometimes cut a piece off. I have a front garden that does not have a lawn yet but I'm not sure what else to do with it so it may get turfed! It is roughly 10'6" x 14'8" or 3.2m x 4.5m The main use however would be for the back garden 18' x 41' or 5.5m x 12m approx. Though I will probably put raised beds, greenhouse, etc onto some of this in the future. That is probably a bit small to be worth the effort of a petrol mower. You should be able to get an electric one that works OK. I know Honda is well thought of for small petrol engines. I see they do two "Izy" models: one is 16" and the other 18". From what I can tell, they use the same engine. I was looking at ones that propelled themselves to make it easier for me. It looks as though they only have one speed: is that an issue? The larger mower is slightly slower but I'm guessing that is because it weighs slightly more. The larger mower costs £100 more. Is it really worth it for an extra two inches? If I have done my sums right, for my garden I would have to go up it 13 times with the 16" and 12 times with the 18", so it wouldn't save me much time. Perhaps I should save money and buy the smaller model? Either one is wider than my current electric one. The 18" is my choice for a moderately large set of lawns with one of them on a fairly aggressive slope where the self propelled feature is helpful. On the flat I don't find it all that important. YMMV It only has one speed - sort of slow walking. We have a Bosch Rotak and it seems to be fine, although we currently only have a small lawn. I don't know if you just had a bad example. Best mower we have had was a Harry (no longer made) which had an alloy deck and a Briggs & Stratton engine. Generally abused and ignored and it always seemed to start and cut well. I have found the electric mower to be much easier than petrol, though. I think it depends a lot on how you get on with things mechanical. They are fairly simple engines and quite easy to maintain and service but if you are having to pay someone to do that work they can become expensive. Electric is by comparison plug and play. Try giving the grass box on your existing one a really good spring clean and you may be surprising at how much performance improves. Something is wrong if it jams. -- Regards, Martin Brown |
#18
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Martin Brown was thinking very hard :
Odd. I have used both sorts and never had an electric one stall on me. Every mower, electric hover (the early orange hover machine), rotary engined and even the current tractor and its immediate predecessor have suffered stalls. More so in the first cuts of the season, but better as the weather warmed up and the grass became drier. I had to be ready to lift the hover off the grass, when I heard it labouring too much. All those which collected grass, have suffered frequent choking with cuttings too. Today the grass was warm and it was fairly dry - using a 14HHP tractor/mower as usual without any grass collection, it managed to choke up it's duct around 5 times, to the point where I had to stop and poke the duct clear with a stick. I have tried running without the duct, but that blows the cuttings onto the drive pulleys and eventually jams the drive system at the back axle/ diff. |
#19
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 31/05/2018 19:37, Harry Bloomfield wrote:
Martin Brown was thinking very hard : Odd. I have used both sorts and never had an electric one stall on me. Every mower, electric hover (the early orange hover machine), rotary engined and even the current tractor and its immediate predecessor have suffered stalls. More so in the first cuts of the season, but better as the weather warmed up and the grass became drier. I had to be ready to lift the hover off the grass, when I heard it labouring too much. All those which collected grass, have suffered frequent choking with cuttings too. Today the grass was warm and it was fairly dry - using a 14HHP tractor/mower as usual without any grass collection, it managed to choke up it's duct around 5 times, to the point where I had to stop and poke the duct clear with a stick. I have tried running without the duct, but that blows the cuttings onto the drive pulleys and eventually jams the drive system at the back axle/ diff. I'm going to look at this from a very different angle. I suspect you don't cut your grass often enough so you are cutting longer grass. One of the best lawns I knew was from an elderly chap who used a push mower without a box to cut his grass. He did it every day without fail, even if it was raining, as there was only a little growth he could just walk the mower, no going back and forth to get it through the grass. If you cut a couple of times a week or even more then you would find it much easier and as you would be taking off a lot less grass every time it would be an easy walk for both you and your mower. Also have a look at the underside, is it clean or has it got grass built up there which will imped the flow of air and clippings. You are only cutting a small area and will be walking (if you cut a 12" strip each time) less than 300 yds, so doing that 2 or 3 times a week will only take you minutes each time and as the grass will be shorter then you wont have to empty the box often, and you will end up with a much better lawn. |
#20
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
David pretended :
You are only cutting a small area and will be walking (if you cut a 12" strip each time) less than 300 yds, so doing that 2 or 3 times a week will only take you minutes each time and as the grass will be shorter then you wont have to empty the box often, and you will end up with a much better lawn. It is usually cut around twice per week, on two consecutive days. It is far too uneven and large to even contemplate a push mower, or really anything less than a tractor. I went through a series of different mower types, before arriving at a tractor. All the others simply couldn't cope with the size of the job, it would take forever and none survived very long. The tractor whips round so quickly, it actually does the job with less fuel than other types I have tried. It is also much easier on me, just driving it around. When I first moved here, the garden was buried under bramble. I tried electric hover, petrol hover, petrol cylinder, electric cylinder - the size and the time needed beat them all. |
#21
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 31 May 2018 20:41:51 +0100, David
wrote: I'm going to look at this from a very different angle. I suspect you don't cut your grass often enough so you are cutting longer grass. You guessed right. I suppose when it's wet I put off cutting it for a dry day, so it just grows longer before I get round to it. |
#22
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 31/05/2018 19:37, Harry Bloomfield wrote:
Martin Brown was thinking very hard : Odd. I have used both sorts and never had an electric one stall on me. Every mower, electric hover (the early orange hover machine), rotary engined and even the current tractor and its immediate predecessor have suffered stalls. More so in the first cuts of the season, but better as the weather warmed up and the grass became drier. I had to be ready to lift the hover off the grass, when I heard it labouring too much. If you wait until the grass is ridiculously long before cutting it or try to cut it when it is far too wet then yes you probably can. All those which collected grass, have suffered frequent choking with cuttings too. Today the grass was warm and it was fairly dry - using a 14HHP tractor/mower as usual without any grass collection, it managed to choke up it's duct around 5 times, to the point where I had to stop and poke the duct clear with a stick. I have tried running without the duct, but that blows the cuttings onto the drive pulleys and eventually jams the drive system at the back axle/ diff. Something doesn't sound right. I sometimes have to free the grass exit if I try to cut one more stripe than I should have done but you can hear the tone of the motor change and see bits of grass dropping out the back when the collection chamber is nearly full. I tend to push it a bit close since I prefer to be at the end nearest the heap when I stop. I blame lack of mechanical sympathy for your woes. -- Regards, Martin Brown |
#23
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
After serious thinking Martin Brown wrote :
I blame lack of mechanical sympathy for your woes. Or it could just be very tough grass and never throughly dries out. We have a few inches of soil, under which is very heavy clay. It used to flood in heavy rain, but I put in lots of drainage to try to help prevent it. It usually needs a week of dry warm weather, even in the summer, before it is fit to try to cut it - so sometimes it just has to be left uncut. The first cut of 2018 was very delayed by the wet weather. |
#24
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 31 May 2018 18:23:49 +0100, Martin Brown wrote:
Mine is a Mountfield 18" petrol with 135cc Honda engine. Briggs & Stratten on my 18" self propelled Mountfield. 20 odd years old, Steel deck that is corroding but no holes or seriously thin bits yet. Replaced the propulsion drive cover, which had cracked and had holes punched in it from stones (moles and snow blower deposits). Which makes me wonder if a plastic deck would last long, steel just shrugs off a stone... Have a new clutch cable for when the old one that I bodged to make work last year finally breaks. It had almost snapped and the free ends of wire where jaming in the cover. trimed them back wrapped in a thin layer of self amalgamting tape to control them, well greased, works a charm on the remaining 3 strands. B-) It has only stalled on me when I tried to cut a flagstone or edging with it and even then it sometimes cut a piece off. Ah reminds me caught something imoveable, stalled and bent the crank shaft at the point it exited the bottom of the engine. New crankshaft required, the vibration from the imbalance was intolerable. The 18" is my choice for a moderately large set of lawns with one of them on a fairly aggressive slope where the self propelled feature is helpful. On the flat I don't find it all that important. YMMV Self propelled is essential here, flat doesn't exist and we cut at the highest setting so there is always a fair bit of grass to push through. It only has one speed - sort of slow walking. Mine had a vari-speed but as I only ever use it flat out when the throttle cable end broke off I just removed it. I guess I ought to change the oil some time, I've done it once in 20 years... -- Cheers Dave. |
#25
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 31 May 2018 18:23:49 +0100, Martin Brown
wrote: How strange. the air flow should be sufficient to blow stuff into the bag or whatever collection method it uses. Have you tried cleaning the bag that the grass cuttings go into? If air can't get out then there will not be enough air flow to carry the grass cuttings along. That's a good idea, I shall try that, thanks. That is probably a bit small to be worth the effort of a petrol mower. You should be able to get an electric one that works OK. Another pet hate is that the cable is a few inches too short and always seems to be in the way, so I like the idea of a petrol one being tangle-free. |
#26
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 31/05/2018 17:40, David wrote:
Best mower we have had was a Harry (no longer made) Are you sure. He insists on popping up here all the time. |
#27
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Andrew" wrote in message news ![]() On 31/05/2018 17:40, David wrote: Best mower we have had was a Harry (no longer made) Are you sure. He insists on popping up here all the time. Fortunately no one has ever made more than the one of those. |
#28
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 31 May 2018 19:31:00 +0100, Andrew wrote:
On 31/05/2018 17:40, David wrote: Best mower we have had was a Harry (no longer made) Are you sure. He insists on popping up here all the time. Perhaps I should have said "Other Harrys are available". Hmmm...something about having to be hand started with a couple of determined tugs? Whatever. :-) Dave R -- AMD FX-6300 in GA-990X-Gaming SLI-CF running Windows 7 Pro x64 --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
#29
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 31/05/2018 17:40, David wrote:
I have found the electric mower to be much easier than petrol, though. For me its the reverse. 60 foot garden with no wires to trail around and the petrol cuts wet longish grass with ease. -- mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk |
#30
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 31 May 2018 16:40:04 GMT, David wrote:
We have a Bosch Rotak and it seems to be fine, although we currently only have a small lawn. I don't know if you just had a bad example. Mine is a Bosch ARM so perhaps mine's an even older model? Best mower we have had was a Harry (no longer made) which had an alloy deck Yes, I see that the new ones are steel and I've read here that people don't like them because they rust. It does seem a backward step. |
#31
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Stephen writes: Hello, Every year I say I am going to get a new mower but never get round to it, but I feel the time has come! I currently have a Bosch electric mower that I have had since 2001. It says it has an induction motor and I don't know if that's the problem. Are these the wrong type of motors for mowers? It means it is quieter than other mowers but it is always stalling. Induction motor is the right type for an electric mower, but is only found in more expensive models. If yours is stalling, it's overloaded or there's something wrong with it. Note it won't have much starting torque, so it won't be able to start if clogged, but once running, it has high torque at nearly full speed, so it shouldn't slow much under normal load. The only failure mode unique to induction motor mowers is the capacitor failing and they cost just a few quid to replace. Symptom is that the already low starting torque gets even lower or drops to nothing in the case of complete failure (can be spin started if you don't mind losing all your fingers!!!), but once started it runs normally. A universal motor used in most electric mowers is exactly the opposite way around - lots of starting torque, but it can't maintain speed when cutting, since a universal motor has to be slowed much more under load to generate torque. Also a universal motor spins way too fast, so it needs additional pulleys and belts to run the blade at the right speed for mowing. This is a lot more to fail - motor brushes, and the belt drive have limited life. Generally, the build quality is way lower than induction motor mowers and the efficiency lower, so needs a higher power rating for same width cut (and motor runs much hotter, which also doesn't help the longevity). -- Andrew Gabriel [email address is not usable -- followup in the newsgroup] |
#32
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 01/06/18 00:04, Andrew Gabriel wrote:
A universal motor used in most electric mowers is exactly the opposite way around - lots of starting torque, but it can't maintain speed when cutting, since a universal motor has to be slowed much more under load to generate torque. Also a universal motor spins way too fast, so it needs additional pulleys and belts to run the blade at the right speed for mowing. This is a lot more to fail - motor brushes, and the belt drive have limited life. Generally, the build quality is way lower than induction motor mowers and the efficiency lower, so needs a higher power rating for same width cut (and motor runs much hotter, which also doesn't help the longevity). This is all utter codswallop. A properly designed and near 'perfect' motor will genee maximum torque one RPM below 'free runnimng' The theory is simple. The motor will spin till the back EMF - a product of the speed, number of turns on the armature and magentic field - matches the applied EMF. When a load is applied if the motor drops speed, the current will incerase until the speed is retired, less any copper losses. That is the EMF and RPM always matches the applied voltage minus IR losses in the copper.. On good motor this can result in near instant burnout when stalled. What I suspect you have encountered is 'stall proof' motors that deliberetely have far top much resistance in the windings. Induction motors are crap really for serious power. Obnce they lose synchronism, they are useless. -- €œA leader is best When people barely know he exists. Of a good leader, who talks little,When his work is done, his aim fulfilled,They will say, €œWe did this ourselves.€ €• Lao Tzu, Tao Te Ching |
#33
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It happens that The Natural Philosopher formulated :
Induction motors are crap really for serious power. Obnce they lose synchronism, they are useless. They are at their best for driving low inertia loads, where the loading gradually increases as the speed increases. |
#34
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 01/06/2018 07:15, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
Induction motors are crap really for serious power. Obnce they lose synchronism, they are useless. That must be why they use them for virtually all large industrial machines because they are cr@p! |
#35
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
on 01/06/2018, dennis@home supposed :
That must be why they use them for virtually all large industrial machines because they are cr@p! In industry, they have several clever starting methods to overcome the drawbacks of induction motors, so for industry they make for a very reliable, cheap and simple to build motor. Universal motors just don't scale up so easily or cheaply, nor as efficiently. |
#36
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 09:42:49 +0100, "dennis@home" wrote:
On 01/06/2018 07:15, The Natural Philosopher wrote: Induction motors are crap really for serious power. Obnce they lose synchronism, they are useless. That must be why they use them for virtually all large industrial machines because they are cr@p! Exactly. Every standby (and sometimes main) boiler feed pump on every single power station in the country, gas circulators on AGR's, circulating water pumps and the boiler fans... all induction motors, mostly supplied at 11kV or 6.6kV 500kW a piece for an AGR gas circulator, same for a circulating water pump and a boiler fan, 5MW for a standby boiler feed pump I can't recall what UK site has (or had) an electric rather than steam driven main boiler feed pump but it was rated in the region of 10MW. -- |
#37
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 11:19:13 +0100, The Other Mike
wrote: I can't recall what UK site has (or had) an electric rather than steam driven main boiler feed pump I can now ![]() Inverkip https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverkip_power_station -- |
#38
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
The Natural Philosopher writes: On 01/06/18 00:04, Andrew Gabriel wrote: A universal motor used in most electric mowers is exactly the opposite way around - lots of starting torque, but it can't maintain speed when cutting, since a universal motor has to be slowed much more under load to generate torque. Also a universal motor spins way too fast, so it needs additional pulleys and belts to run the blade at the right speed for mowing. This is a lot more to fail - motor brushes, and the belt drive have limited life. Generally, the build quality is way lower than induction motor mowers and the efficiency lower, so needs a higher power rating for same width cut (and motor runs much hotter, which also doesn't help the longevity). This is all utter codswallop. A properly designed and near 'perfect' motor will genee maximum torque one RPM below 'free runnimng' What technology is your mystical motor? Max torque for an induction motor is at 25% slip (which is around 80% free running speed), but you don't design for that high a load because you are too near to stalling. Normal max design slip is 20% slip (around 85% free running speed). This is why it's perfect for cutting grass - max torque is still at a high enough speed to cut grass. Max torque for a universal motor is locked rotor (stalled, stationary). In the normal region of operation where speed is high enough to cut grass, the motor's torque is lowest, which makes maintaining that grass cutting speed under load much less likely. The motor is unlikely to completely stall because the torque gets very high as it gets close, but the torque is low at minimum effective cutting speed, so it easily drops below effective cutting speed with load, and thus not so suitable for grass cutting. Induction motors are crap really for serious power. Obnce they lose synchronism, they are useless. Hum, maybe you are confusing induction motors with synchronous motors, used for old mains clocks and timeswitches? Serious power motors are *exclusively* induction motors - no other type is used. -- Andrew Gabriel [email address is not usable -- followup in the newsgroup] |
#39
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 22:00:16 +0000, Andrew Gabriel wrote:
====snip==== Serious power motors are *exclusively* induction motors - no other type is used. Correction: Serious (industrial) power motors are *exclusively* *Three Phase* induction motors. :-) -- Johnny B Good |
#40
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y,uk.rec.gardening
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 01/06/18 23:54, Johnny B Good wrote:
On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 22:00:16 +0000, Andrew Gabriel wrote: ====snip==== Serious power motors are *exclusively* induction motors - no other type is used. Correction: Serious (industrial) power motors are *exclusively* *Three Phase* induction motors. :-) Yes but they aren't driven directly from 50Hz. So the disadvantages of fixed frequency working dont apply. -- Of what good are dead warriors? €¦ Warriors are those who desire battle more than peace. Those who seek battle despite peace. Those who thump their spears on the ground and talk of honor. Those who leap high the battle dance and dream of glory €¦ The good of dead warriors, Mother, is that they are dead. Sheri S Tepper: The Awakeners. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
O T: Suffolk 75G14 Petrol Lawn Mower | UK diy | |||
Budget Petrol Mower Recommendations ?? | UK diy | |||
Adding electric start to petrol lawn mower | Home Repair | |||
Adding electric start to petrol lawn mower | Home Repair | |||
Lawn-mower petrol stabiliser | UK diy |